DOCSLIB.ORG

0211 Sesli.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0211 Sesli.Pdf MYCOLOGIA BALCANICA 2: 119–160 (2005) 119 Checklists of the myxomycetes and macromycetes in Turkey Ertuğrul Sesli * & Cvetomir M. Denchev Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Fatih Education, Department of Sciences Education, Trabzon, Turkey Institute of Botany, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 23 Acad. G. Bonchev St., 1113 Sofi a, Bulgaria Received 24 August 2004 / Accepted 28 February 2005 Abstract. Th is paper attempts to compile available data on Turkish myxomycetes and macromycetes published between 1915 and February, 2005, and obtained from 294 publications. Two main lists of myxomycetes and macromycetes are given where the taxa are alphabetically arranged. Th e total number of correct names of species, recorded from Turkey and presented in both checklists, is 1778, including 177 myxomycetes and 1601 macromycetes. For each taxon, references are cited. An index of synonyms based on literature records from Turkey is appended. It includes 671 species and infraspecifi c taxa. Information about the species distribution in the European or/and Asian parts of Turkey is also given. Key words: biodiversity, fungal diversity, macromycetes, myxomycetes, taxonomy, Turkey Introduction Turkey and published in diff erent journals to be a guide for future studies. In addition, we hope that the paper will be A number of studies on the mycota of Turkey have been helpful for creating a database of the Turkish mycota. published. Contemporary knowledge of the diversity of Turkish myxomycetes and macromycetes is based on a period of 90 years of investigations. In the course of our observation Materials and Methods of literature sources we listed 294 scientifi c works, containing various Turkish records of myxomycetes and macromycetes. Main lists of myxomycetes and macromycetes are created. Th e Th e fi rst contribution on macromycetes from Turkey taxa are given in alphabetical order: orders within each class, was published by K. Vlaev in 1915. Baytop (1994) listed families within each order, etc. Th e numbers within square 168 publications dealing with Turkish macromycetes. Sesli brackets following the authors of each species or infraspecifi c & Baydar (1995, 1996) presented the fi rst macromycetes taxon refer to the reference(s) where the taxon is reported. A checklists, including Russulaceae and Agaricales, respectively. number [001-288] is assigned to each reference in the section Th e fi rst checklist of myxomycetes was compiled by Ergül & “Bibliography of the contributions to Turkish myxomycetes Dülger (2000). Nevertheless a really complete catalogue of and macromycetes”. Th e system of the suprageneric taxa is in the myxomycetes and macromycetes of Turkey has not been accordance with Kirk et al. (2001). Th e generic and species published yet. Th is situation allows room for many mistakes, treatment of and into diff erent genera follows a lot of recent sometimes of their multiplication, in mycological papers, monographs and particular articles on European fungi. Th e especially in some articles concerning new Turkish records. names of authors of fungal species are abbreviated according In the past, some species were published as new records many to Kirk & Ansell (1992) and Kirk et al. (2004). times and in diff erent years by the same or diff erent authors, Because many species have been published under diff erent and in the same or diff erent journals. names, a thesaurus of synonyms is listed separately with Th e aim of the present study is an attempt to summarize references to the correct names used in the main lists of the species of myxomycetes and macromycetes recorded in myxomycetes and macromycetes. *Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] 120 sesli, e. & denchev, c.m. — checklists of the myxomycetes and macromycetes in turkey A list of myxomycetes L. fl avofuscum (Ehrenb.) Rostaf. [079, 086], L. terrestre Fr. [164, 259] PROTOSTELIOMYCETES Reticularia lycoperdon Bull. [062, 164, 259], R. Protosteliales splendens Morgan [079, 107, 112, 113, 246] Ceratiomyxaceae Tubulifera arachnoidea Jacq. [082, 177, 179a, 259] Famintzinia fruticulosa (O.F. Müll.) Lado [079, 086, 115, 179a, 259] Physarales Didymiaceae MYXOMYCETES Diderma chondrioderma (de Bary & Rostaf.) G. Lister Echinosteliales [074, 079], D. hemisphaericum (Bull.) Hornem. Clastodermataceae [079, 179a], D. testaceum (Schrad.) Pers. [082] Clastoderma debaryanum A. Blytt [079, 179a], C. Didymium anellus Morgan [177, 179a], D. bahiense pachypus Nann.-Bremek. [079] Gottsb. [082], D. crustaceum Fr. [177, 178], D. Echinosteliaceae diff orme (Pers.) Gray [079], D. eximium Peck Echinostelium arboreum H.W. Keller & T.E. Brooks [082], D. fl occosum G.W. Martin, K.S. Th ind & [079], E. coelocephalum T.E. Brooks & H.W. Keller Rehill [074, 079], D. iridis (Ditmar) Fr. [179], D. [079], E. colliculosum K.D. Whitney & H.W. Keller minus (Lister) Morgan [079], D. nigripes (Link) [079, 116], E. corynophorum K.D. Whitney [079, Fr. [082, 177, 179a], D. quitense (Pat.) Torrend 114], E. cribrarioides Alexop. [079], E. elachiston [079, 116, 178, 179a], D. squamulosum (Alb. & Alexop. [079, 115], E. fragile Nann.-Bremek. [079, Schwein.) Fr. [079, 116, 178, 179a] 114], E. ladoi Pando [190], E. minutum de Bary Mucilago crustacea F.H. Wigg. [079, 080] [074, 079, 115, 116, 177, 178, 179a] Physaraceae Badhamia affi nis Rostaf. [116], B. capsulifera (Bull.) Liceales Berk. [082], B. foliicola Lister [074, 079, 116, 178, Cribrariaceae 179a], B. macrocarpa (Ces.) Rostaf. [079, 178], B. Cribraria argillacea (Pers. ex J.F. Gmel.) Pers. [082, nitens Berk. [079], B. panicea (Fr.) Rostaf. [079, 086, 177, 179a], C. aurantiaca Schrad. [079, 116, 178, 179a], B. utricularis (Bull.) Berk. [190], 086], C. cancellata (Batsch) Nann.-Bremek. [074, B. versicolor Lister [079, 116], B. viridescens Meyl. 079, 083, 086, 177, 178, 179a, 273], C. elegans [079] Berk. & M.A. Curtis [082], C. intricata Schrad. Badhamiopsis ainoae (Yamash.) T.E. Brooks & H.W. [177, 179a], C. macrocarpa Schrad. [177, 179a], Keller [079, 178] C. microcarpa (Schrad.) Pers. [082, 177, 179a], Craterium concinnum Rex [179a], C. minutum (Leers) C. minutissima Schwein. [079], C. tenella Schrad. Fr. [082, 086] [082, 086], C. violacea Rex [074, 079, 116], C. Fuligo septica (L.) F.H. Wigg. [079, 082, 084, 086, vulgaris Schrad. [190] 179a] Lindbladia tubulina Fr. [082] Leocarpus fragilis (Dicks.) Rostaf. [074, 079, 179a] Liceaceae Physarum album (Bull.) Chevall. [074, 079, 086, 179a, Licea belmontiana Nann.-Bremek. [190], L. biforis 273], Ph. auriscalpium Cooke [115], Ph. bitectum Morgan [177, 179a], L. castanea G. Lister [079, G. Lister [079, 116], Ph. cinereum (Batsch) Pers. 178], L. denudescens H.W. Keller & T.E. Brooks [079, 115, 178, 179a], Ph. compressum Alb. & [079, 116, 178], L. inconspicua T.E. Brooks & Schwein. [079], Ph. contextum (Pers.) Pers. [079, H.W. Keller [190], L. kleistobolus G.W. Martin 116], Ph. decipiens M.A. Curtis [079, 116, 178, [079, 115, 116, 179a], L. minima Fr. [079, 179a], 273], Ph. flavicomum Berk. [082, 086], Ph. L. operculata (Wingate) G.W. Martin [079, 179a], leucophaeum Fr. [079, 178], Ph. leucopus Link L. parasitica (Zukal) G.W. Martin [079, 179a], [178], Ph. luteolum Peck [190], Ph. notabile T. L. pedicellata (H.C. Gilbert) H.C. Gilbert [079], Macbr. [082, 178], Ph. oblatum T. Macbr. [079], L. perexigua T.E. Brooks & H.W. Keller [190], L. Ph. ovisporum G. Lister [082], Ph. pusillum (Berk. punctiformis G.W. Martin [079], L. pusilla Schrad. & M.A. Curtis) G. Lister [073, 074, 079, 178, 273], [079, 179a], L. pygmaea (Meyl.) Ing [074, 079], Ph. vernum Sommerf. [190], Ph. viride (Bull.) Pers. L. synsporos Nann.-Brem. [179], L. tenera E. Jahn [074, 079, 086, 179a] [079, 178], L. tuberculata G.W. Martin [177, 178], Protophysarum phloiogenum M. Blackw. & Alexop. L. variabilis Schrad. [179] [190] Reticulariaceae Lycogala epidendrum (L.) Fr. [074, 079, 086, 112, 113, Stemonitales 115, 135, 173, 179a, 204, 206, 207, 214, 246, 259, Stemonitidaceae 261, 263], L. exiguum Morgan [177, 179a, 190], Collaria arcyrionema (Rostk.) Nann.-Bremek. [190], mycologia balcanica () 121 C. lurida (Lister) Nann.-Bremek [079, 178, 179a], 082], A. nigella Emoto [177, 179a], A. obvelata C. rubens (Lister) Nann.-Bremek [115] (Oeder) Onsberg [074, 079, 086, 178, 179a, Comatricha elegans (Racib.) G. Lister [079, 116, 179a], 259], A. pomiformis (Leers) Rostaf. [079, 086, C. ellae Härk. [079], C. laxa Rostaf. [074, 079, 115, 116, 177, 178, 179a], A. stipata (Schwein.) 116], C. nigra (Pers. ex J.F. Gmel.) J. Schröt. [074, Lister [082, 086], A. versicolor W. Phillips [079, 079, 116, 178, 179a, 273], C. pulchella (C. Bab. ex 115, 178, 179a] Berk.) Rostaf. [081, 177, 179a, 273], C. tenerrima Dianemataceae (M.A. Curtis) G. Lister [177, 179a] Calomyxa metallica (Berk.) Nieuwl. [079] Diachea leucopodia (Bull.) Rostaf. [079, 116] Dianema corticatum Lister [179a], D. repens G. Lister Enerthenema papillatum (Pers.) Rostaf. [079, 116, & Cran [082] 178, 179a] Trichiaceae Lamproderma arcyrioides (Sommerf.) Rostaf. [079, Hyporhamma calyculata (Speg.) Lado [079, 080, 086], 115], L. columbinum (Pers.) Rostaf. [190], L. H. clavata (Pers.) Lado [079, 115], H. leiocarpa scintillans (Berk. & Broome) Morgan [177, (Cooke) Lado [190], H. minor (G. Lister) Lado 179a] [190] Macbrideola cornea (G. Lister & Cran) Alexop. [079, Lachnobolus atrus (Alb. & Schwein.) Lado [006, 079, 115, 116, 179a], M. decapillata H.C. Gilbert [079, 256] 273], M. martini (Alexop. & Beneke) Alexop. Metatrichia fl oriformis (Schwein.) Nann.-Bremek. [190], M. scintillans H.C. Gilbert [082], M. [190], M. vesparium (Batsch) Nann.-Bremek. ex synsporos (Alexop.) Alexop. [079] G.W. Martin & Alexop. [079, 083, 086] Paradiacheopsis acanthodes (Alexop.) Nann.-Bremek. Oligonema schweinitzii (Berk.) G.W. Martin [179] [076, 177, 179a], P. cribrata Nann.-Bremek. [190], Perichaena chrysosperma (Curr.) Lister [074, 079, P. fi mbriata (G. Lister & Cran) Hertel ex Nann.- 179a], P. corticalis (Batsch) Rostaf. [079, 115, Bremek. [079, 115, 116], P. microcarpa (Meyl.) 116, 178, 179a], P. tessellata G. Lister [190], P. D.W. Mitch. ex Ing [190], P. rigida (Brândză) vermicularis (Schwein.) Rostaf. [079, 178] Nann.-Bremek. [076, 190], P. solitaria (Nann.- Trichia affi nis de Bary [082, 086], T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catathelasma
    CATATHELASMA No. 4 December 2003 BIODIVERSITY of FUNGI in SLOVAKIA Coprinus atramentarius and C. micaceus in BRA Ján Červenka and Milan Zelenay 3 Macrofungi of the Abrod reserve Slavomír Adamčík and Ladislav Hagara 9 NEW FUNGI for SLOVAKIA Galeropsis lateritia Ladislav Hagara 19 Hyphodontia tuberculata Ladislav Hagara 21 Waxcaps, Hygrocybe omitted in the checklist of Slovak fungi in the collections of the Slovak National Museum Ivona Kautmanová 23 Boletopsis grisea Slavomír Adamčík and Soňa Ripková 31 MYCOLOGICAL NEWS Book notices Pavel Lizoň 18, 22 21st European Cortinarius Foray Pavel Lizoň 30 Editor's acknowledgements 35 Instructions to authors 35 ISSN 1335-7670 Catathelasma 4: 1-36 (2003) Grid cells are bounded with geographical coordinates (longitude and latitude). Boundaries of basic grid cells (squares) represent 10’ long. (west to east) x 6’ lat. (north to south), an area of ca 12 x 11.1 km which covers ca 133 km². The square code consists of four-digit number, a combination of two-digit designator of horizontal line and two-digit designator for vertical row. Each square can be divided (for more detailed mapping) to four quadrants 5’ x 3’ which are coded by letters a (NW), b (NE), c (SW), d (SE). The quadrant code consists of four- digit number (square code) and the letter of particular quadrant December 2003 Catathelasma 4 3 COPRINUS ATRAMENTARIUS AND C. MICACEUS IN BRA 1 2 JÁN ČERVENKA & MILAN ZELENAY Key words: collections, Slovak National Museum, taxonomy, misidentifications Last summer (July/August 2003) we have critically studied all available specimens of two common Coprinus species, C.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON Edible Mushrooms
    Plate 1. A. Coprinus micaceus (Mica, or Inky, Cap). B. Coprinus comatus (Shaggymane). C. Agaricus campestris (Field Mushroom). D. Calvatia calvatia (Carved Puffball). All edible. COMMON Edible Mushrooms by Clyde M. Christensen Professor of Plant Pathology University of Minnesota THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PRESS Minneapolis © Copyright 1943 by the UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA © Copyright renewed 1970 by Clyde M. Christensen All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without the writ- ten permission of the publisher. Permission is hereby granted to reviewers to quote brief passages, in a review to be printed in a maga- zine or newspaper. Printed at Lund Press, Minneapolis SIXTH PRINTING 1972 ISBN: 0-8166-0509-2 Table of Contents ABOUT MUSHROOMS 3 How and Where They Grow, 6. Mushrooms Edible and Poi- sonous, 9. How to Identify Them, 12. Gathering Them, 14. THE FOOLPROOF FOUR 18 Morels, or Sponge Mushrooms, 18. Puff balls, 19. Sulphur Shelf Mushrooms, or Sulphur Polypores, 21. Shaggyrnanes, 22. Mushrooms with Gills WHITE SPORE PRINT 27 GENUS Amanita: Amanita phalloides (Death Cap), 28. A. verna, 31. A. muscaria (Fly Agaric), 31. A. russuloides, 33. GENUS Amanitopsis: Amanitopsis vaginata, 35. GENUS Armillaria: Armillaria mellea (Honey, or Shoestring, Fun- gus), 35. GENUS Cantharellus: Cantharellus aurantiacus, 39. C. cibarius, 39. GENUS Clitocybe: Clitocybe illudens (Jack-o'-Lantern), 41. C. laccata, 43. GENUS Collybia: Collybia confluens, 44. C. platyphylla (Broad- gilled Collybia), 44. C. radicata (Rooted Collybia), 46. C. velu- tipes (Velvet-stemmed Collybia), 46. GENUS Lactarius: Lactarius cilicioides, 49. L. deliciosus, 49. L. sub- dulcis, 51. GENUS Hypomyces: Hypomyces lactifluorum, 52.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Polyporales in the Malay Peninsular and the Application of Ganoderma Australe (Fr.) Pat
    DIVERSITY OF POLYPORALES IN THE MALAY PENINSULAR AND THE APPLICATION OF GANODERMA AUSTRALE (FR.) PAT. IN BIOPULPING OF EMPTY FRUIT BUNCHES OF ELAEIS GUINEENSIS MOHAMAD HASNUL BIN BOLHASSAN FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR 2013 DIVERSITY OF POLYPORALES IN THE MALAY PENINSULAR AND THE APPLICATION OF GANODERMA AUSTRALE (FR.) PAT. IN BIOPULPING OF EMPTY FRUIT BUNCHES OF ELAEIS GUINEENSIS MOHAMAD HASNUL BIN BOLHASSAN THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR 2013 UNIVERSITI MALAYA ORIGINAL LITERARY WORK DECLARATION Name of Candidate: MOHAMAD HASNUL BIN BOLHASSAN (I.C No: 830416-13-5439) Registration/Matric No: SHC080030 Name of Degree: DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Title of Project Paper/Research Report/Disertation/Thesis (“this Work”): DIVERSITY OF POLYPORALES IN THE MALAY PENINSULAR AND THE APPLICATION OF GANODERMA AUSTRALE (FR.) PAT. IN BIOPULPING OF EMPTY FRUIT BUNCHES OF ELAEIS GUINEENSIS. Field of Study: MUSHROOM DIVERSITY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY I do solemnly and sincerely declare that: 1) I am the sole author/writer of this work; 2) This Work is original; 3) Any use of any work in which copyright exists was done by way of fair dealing and for permitted purposes and any excerpt or extract from, or reference to or reproduction of any copyright work has been disclosed expressly and sufficiently and the title of the Work and its authorship have been acknowledge in this Work; 4) I do not have any actual
    [Show full text]
  • Justo Et Al 2010 Pluteaceae.Pdf
    ARTICLE IN PRESS fungal biology xxx (2010) 1e20 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funbio Phylogeny of the Pluteaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota): taxonomy and character evolution Alfredo JUSTOa,*,1, Alfredo VIZZINIb,1, Andrew M. MINNISc, Nelson MENOLLI Jr.d,e, Marina CAPELARId, Olivia RODRıGUEZf, Ekaterina MALYSHEVAg, Marco CONTUh, Stefano GHIGNONEi, David S. HIBBETTa aBiology Department, Clark University, 950 Main St., Worcester, MA 01610, USA bDipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Universita di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, I-10125 Torino, Italy cSystematic Mycology & Microbiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, B011A, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA dNucleo de Pesquisa em Micologia, Instituto de Botanica,^ Caixa Postal 3005, Sao~ Paulo, SP 010631 970, Brazil eInstituto Federal de Educac¸ao,~ Ciencia^ e Tecnologia de Sao~ Paulo, Rua Pedro Vicente 625, Sao~ Paulo, SP 01109 010, Brazil fDepartamento de Botanica y Zoologıa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Apartado Postal 1-139, Zapopan, Jal. 45101, Mexico gKomarov Botanical Institute, 2 Popov St., St. Petersburg RUS-197376, Russia hVia Marmilla 12, I-07026 Olbia (OT), Italy iInstituto per la Protezione delle Piante, CNR Sezione di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, I-10125 Torino, Italy article info abstract Article history: The phylogeny of the genera traditionally classified in the family Pluteaceae (Agaricales, Received 17 June 2010 Basidiomycota) was investigated using molecular data from nuclear ribosomal genes Received in revised form (nSSU, ITS, nLSU) and consequences for taxonomy and character evolution were evaluated. 16 September 2010 The genus Volvariella is polyphyletic, as most of its representatives fall outside the Pluteoid Accepted 26 September 2010 clade and shows affinities to some hygrophoroid genera (Camarophyllus, Cantharocybe). Corresponding Editor: Volvariella gloiocephala and allies are placed in a different clade, which represents the sister Joseph W.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fungi in Ireland
    FOREST FUNGI IN IRELAND PAUL DOWDING and LOUIS SMITH COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development Arena House Arena Road Sandyford Dublin 18 Ireland Tel: + 353 1 2130725 Fax: + 353 1 2130611 © COFORD 2008 First published in 2008 by COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development, Dublin, Ireland. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from COFORD. All photographs and illustrations are the copyright of the authors unless otherwise indicated. ISBN 1 902696 62 X Title: Forest fungi in Ireland. Authors: Paul Dowding and Louis Smith Citation: Dowding, P. and Smith, L. 2008. Forest fungi in Ireland. COFORD, Dublin. The views and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of COFORD. i CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................v Réamhfhocal...........................................................................................................vi Preface ....................................................................................................................vii Réamhrá................................................................................................................viii Acknowledgements...............................................................................................ix
    [Show full text]
  • Taxons BW Fin 2013
    Liste des 1863 taxons en Brabant Wallon au 31/12/2013 (1298 basidios, 436 ascos, 108 myxos et 21 autres) [1757 taxons au 31/12/2012, donc 106 nouveaux taxons] Remarque : Le nombre derrière le nom du taxon correspond au nombre de récoltes. Ascomycètes Acanthophiobolus helicosporus : 1 Cheilymenia granulata : 2 Acrospermum compressum : 4 Cheilymenia oligotricha : 6 Albotricha acutipila : 2 Cheilymenia raripila : 1 Aleuria aurantia : 31 Cheilymenia rubra : 1 Aleuria bicucullata : 1 Cheilymenia theleboloides : 2 Aleuria cestrica : 1 Chlorociboria aeruginascens : 3 Allantoporthe decedens : 2 Chlorosplenium viridulum : 4 Amphiporthe leiphaemia : 1 Choiromyces meandriformis : 1 Anthostomella rubicola : 2 Ciboria amentacea : 9 Anthostomella tomicoides : 2 Ciboria batschiana : 8 Anthracobia humillima : 1 Ciboria caucus : 15 Anthracobia macrocystis : 3 Ciboria coryli : 2 Anthracobia maurilabra : 1 Ciboria rufofusca : 1 Anthracobia melaloma : 3 Cistella grevillei : 1 Anthracobia nitida : 1 Cladobotryum dendroides : 1 Apiognomonia errabunda : 1 Claussenomyces atrovirens : 1 Apiognomonia hystrix : 4 Claviceps microcephala : 1 Aporhytisma urticae : 1 Claviceps purpurea : 2 Arachnopeziza aurata : 1 Clavidisculum caricis : 1 Arachnopeziza aurelia : 1 Coleroa robertiani : 1 Arthrinium sporophleum : 1 Colletotrichum dematium : 1 Arthrobotrys oligospora : 3 Colletotrichum trichellum : 2 Ascobolus albidus : 16 Colpoma quercinum : 1 Ascobolus brassicae : 4 Coniochaeta ligniaria : 1 Ascobolus carbonarius : 5 Coprotus disculus : 1 Ascobolus crenulatus : 11
    [Show full text]
  • 9B Taxonomy to Genus
    Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella
    [Show full text]
  • Karnataka), India
    American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 12 (6): 750-759, 2012 ISSN 1818-6769 © IDOSI Publications, 2012 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2012.12.06.56401 Biodiversity of Mushrooms in and Around Bangalore (Karnataka), India 12H. Pushpa and K.B. Purushothama 1Department of Microbiology, M.S.Ramaiah College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Bangalore, India 2Department of Botany, St. Joseph’s Post Graduate and Research Centre, Bangalore, India Abstract: Bangalore (Bengaluru) is also called as a Garden city of India, positioned at 12°58' and 12°97' N lat and 77°34' and 77°56’ E longitudes with a wide range of ecosystem. The floristic composition of this region has been studied earlier by several workers, but the fungus which forms an important component of the ecosystem has been largely neglected in a biodiversity studies. The present investigation is an attempt to give a broad picture of biodiversity of mushrooms belonging to the class Basidiomycetes in Bangalore. The survey were conducted from June 2007 to November 2010 in 8 different places which included scrub jungles and urban places in a around Bangalore. A total number of 90 species in 48 genera belonging to 19 families in 05 orders were recorded, 28 species were found to be recorded for the first time in India. Among the collected species Coprinus disseminates followed by Coprinus fibrillosis and Schizophyllum communae was found to be abundant in their occurrence. The Simpson and Sannon diversity biodiversity index was found to be 0.8 and 1.24 respectively. The detailed report of the study has been presented here.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Brief: Foraged Mushroom Consumption in Ontario  Wild Mushrooms Are Found in Ontario’S Farmers’ Markets
    EVIDENCE BRIEF Foraged Mushroom Consumption in Ontario November 2019 Key Messages Wild mushrooms are widespread in Ontario, and are harvested by individual hobbyists and commercial enterprises for public consumption. Many species are poisonous. Health effects of such species can range from mild to severe, including death. However, serious poisonings are rare. There are no simple tests to determine if a mushroom is poisonous. Safe consumption of wild mushrooms and other wild foods requires they be correctly identified by knowledgeable harvesters. Over a thousand calls were made to the Ontario Poison Centre (OPC) over a recent 5-year period that were mushroom-related, with at least 90 cases resulting in hospital admission. There are no reported cases of poisoning linked to commercial foraging. However, currently there is no mechanism for licensing or accrediting wild mushroom foragers. Evidence Brief: Foraged Mushroom Consumption in Ontario Wild mushrooms are found in Ontario’s farmers’ markets. Certain farmers’ market food vendors are exempt from the Food Premises Regulation. However, assessments and inspections may be carried out to ensure compliance with the Health Protection and Promotion Act. Issue and Research Question Foraging of wild mushrooms occurs in diverse communities, including some within Ontario. 1-3 Foraged mushrooms may be sold in farmers’ markets, grocery stores, health food stores, restaurants, and online. There are reported cases of adverse health outcomes from consuming foraged mushrooms.1 Public health units in Ontario have requested advice from Public Health Ontario in response to concerns of potential adverse health effects from consumption of wild foraged mushrooms being sold in their regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi of the Fortuna Forest Reserve: Taxonomy and Ecology with Emphasis on Ectomycorrhizal Communities
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.045724; this version posted April 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Fungi of the Fortuna Forest Reserve: Taxonomy and ecology with emphasis on ectomycorrhizal communities Adriana Corrales1 and Clark L. Ovrebo2 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Universidad del Rosario. Bogota, 111221, Colombia. 2 Department of Biology, University of Central Oklahoma. Edmond, OK. USA. ABSTRACT Panamanian montane forests harbor a high diversity of fungi, particularly of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi, however their taxonomy and diversity patterns remain for the most part unexplored. Here we present state of the art fungal taxonomy and diversity patterns at Fortuna Forest Reserve based on morphological and molecular identification of over 1,000 fruiting body collections of macromycetes made over a period of five years. We compare these new results with previously published work based on environmental sampling of Oreomunnea mexicana root tips. We compiled a preliminary list of species and report 22 new genera and 29 new fungal species for Panama. Based on fruiting body collection data we compare the species composition of ECM fungal communities associated with Oreomunnea stands across sites differing in soil fertility and amount of rainfall. We also examine the effect of a long-term nitrogen addition treatment on the fruiting body production of ECM fungi. Finally, we discuss the biogeographic importance of Panama collections which fill in the knowledge gap of ECM fungal records between Costa Rica and Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire Fungus Checklist 2010
    THE CHECKLIST OF SHROPSHIRE FUNGI 2011 Contents Page Introduction 2 Name changes 3 Taxonomic Arrangement (with page numbers) 19 Checklist 25 Indicator species 229 Rare and endangered fungi in /Shropshire (Excluding BAP species) 230 Important sites for fungi in Shropshire 232 A List of BAP species and their status in Shropshire 233 Acknowledgements and References 234 1 CHECKLIST OF SHROPSHIRE FUNGI Introduction The county of Shropshire (VC40) is large and landlocked and contains all major habitats, apart from coast and dune. These include the uplands of the Clees, Stiperstones and Long Mynd with their associated heath land, forested land such as the Forest of Wyre and the Mortimer Forest, the lowland bogs and meres in the north of the county, and agricultural land scattered with small woodlands and copses. This diversity makes Shropshire unique. The Shropshire Fungus Group has been in existence for 18 years. (Inaugural meeting 6th December 1992. The aim was to produce a fungus flora for the county. This aim has not yet been realised for a number of reasons, chief amongst these are manpower and cost. The group has however collected many records by trawling the archives, contributions from interested individuals/groups, and by field meetings. It is these records that are published here. The first Shropshire checklist was published in 1997. Many more records have now been added and nearly 40,000 of these have now been added to the national British Mycological Society’s database, the Fungus Record Database for Britain and Ireland (FRDBI). During this ten year period molecular biology, i.e. DNA analysis has been applied to fungal classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Fungus Fair
    Oakland Museum, 6-7 December 2003 Mycological Society of San Francisco Catalogue of Fungus Fair Introduction ......................................................................................................................2 History ..............................................................................................................................3 Statistics ...........................................................................................................................4 Total collections (excluding "sp.") Numbers of species by multiplicity of collections (excluding "sp.") Numbers of taxa by genus (excluding "sp.") Common names ................................................................................................................6 New names or names not recently recorded .................................................................7 Numbers of field labels from tables Species found - listed by name .......................................................................................8 Species found - listed by multiplicity on forays ..........................................................13 Forays ranked by numbers of species .........................................................................16 Larger forays ranked by proportion of unique species ...............................................17 Species found - by county and by foray ......................................................................18 Field and Display Label examples ................................................................................27
    [Show full text]