Approved Conservation Advice for Eucalyptus Lateritica (Laterite Mallee)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Approved Conservation Advice for Eucalyptus Lateritica (Laterite Mallee) This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Eucalyptus lateritica (Laterite Mallee) This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Eucalyptus lateritica, Family Myrtaceae, also known as Laterite Mallee or Mt Michaud Mallee (Brown et al., 1998), is an erect, lignotuberous mallee up to 3 m tall with rough grey- brown bark at the base. Juvenile leaves are to 180 mm long, 35 mm wide, lanceolate, held horizontally and slightly glossy. Adult leaves are also slightly glossy, thin, to 100 mm long, 15 mm wide, sparsely veined, green to dark green with many small discrete glands. Each inflorescence has up to 11 club-shaped buds that are 10 mm long and 2 mm wide, with a slightly rough surface. Flowers are white, and appear from April to October. Fruit are cup- shaped, to 15 mm long, 15 mm wide, with a thick rim and ring-like disc. Seeds are brown, lustrous, 5 mm long, 3 mm wide, narrowly pyramidal in shape, with lateral wings (Brooker & Hopper, 1986; Napier et al., 1988; Brown et al., 1998; Patrick & Brown, 2001). Conservation Status Laterite Mallee is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Laterite Mallee is also listed as declared rare flora under the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (Western Australia). Distribution and Habitat Laterite Mallee is endemic to Western Australia, where it is known from 13 small (generally less than 20 individuals), isolated populations occurring over a range of approximately 30 km in the Gairdner Range, Mount Lesueur, and the Coomallo Hill area (Brooker & Hopper, 1986; Brown et al., 1998; Patrick & Brown, 2001) within the Northern Agricultural (Western Australia) Natural Resource Management Region. The largest populations are on non- reserved private farmland. Insufficient information exists to determine population trends for Laterite Mallee as the number of individuals were not recorded for many populations. Additionally, the majority of records originate from the 1980s with little to no data existing from 1994 onwards. This species inhabits white or grey sandy soils of lateritic, gravelly slopes and breakaways in upland regions. Laterite Mallee occurs in mallee heath that includes Eucalyptus accedens, E. drummondii, E. gardneri, E. gittinsii, E. marginata, E. suberea, Banksia lanata, B. micrantha, Hakea trifurcata, Calothamnus quadrifidus, and Dryandra spp. (Brooker & Hopper, 1986; Patrick & Brown, 2001). The distribution of this species is not known to overlap with any EPBC Act-listed threatened ecological communities. Threats The main potential threats to Laterite Mallee include disease, fire, insects, grazing, weeds and mining (coal). Laterite Mallee is “presumed not susceptible” to dieback caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi; however this has not been confirmed (Patrick & Brown, 2001), and Eucalyptus lateritica Conservation Advice - Page 1 of 3 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 the potential for disease to be a threat has been noted during a number of surveys. This species should be protected from frequent fire until the impact of fire on the species has been determined (Patrick & Brown, 2001). Research Priorities Research priorities that would inform future regional and local priority actions include: • More precisely assess population size, distribution, ecological requirements, and the relative impacts of threatening processes. • Conduct research on the susceptibility to dieback caused by Phytophthora spp. (Patrick & Brown, 2001) and other known pathogens within the region. • Identify appropriate intensity and interval of fire regimes to promote seed germination and/or vegetation regeneration. • Review historical insect infestations to determine the status of any current infestations; the insect species involved; any ecosystem imbalances that may encourage outbreaks; and investigate appropriate amelioration methods. • Undertake genetic analysis to determine the relationship of the species to other species (such as Eucalyptus todtiana) that may be related (Patrick & Brown, 2001). • Undertake survey work in suitable habitat and potential habitat to locate any additional populations/occurrences/remnants. • Design and implement a monitoring program or, if appropriate, support and enhance existing programs. Regional and Local Priority Actions The following priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of Laterite Mallee. Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification • Monitor known populations to identify key threats. • Minimise adverse impacts from land use at known sites. • Ensure mining infrastructure or maintenance activities involving substrate or vegetation disturbance in areas where Laterite Mallee occurs do not adversely impact on known populations. • Monitor the progress of recovery, including the effectiveness of management actions and the need to adapt them if necessary. • Investigate formal conservation arrangements, management agreements and covenants on private land, and for crown and private land investigate inclusion in reserve tenure if possible. Fire • Develop and implement a suitable fire management strategy for Laterite Mallee. • Provide maps of known occurrences to local and state Rural Fire Services and seek inclusion of mitigative measures in bush fire risk management plans, risk register and/or operation maps. Trampling, Browsing or Grazing • Manage known sites to ensure appropriate grazing regimes occur to allow recruitment from seedlings. • Prevent grazing pressure at known sites through exclusion fencing or other barriers. Diseases, Fungi and Insects • If necessary, implement appropriate management actions to minimise the adverse impacts of existing infestations of insects and disease. Eucalyptus lateritica Conservation Advice - Page 2 of 3 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 Invasive Weeds • Identify and remove weeds in the local area, which could become a threat to Laterite Mallee, using appropriate methods. • Manage sites to prevent introduction of weeds in the area, which could become a threat to the species, using appropriate methods. • Ensure chemicals or other mechanisms used to eradicate weeds do not have a significant adverse impact on Laterite Mallee. Conservation Information • Raise awareness of Laterite Mallee within the local community and through the Jurien Regional Herbarium using fact sheets or information brochures. Enable Recovery of Additional Sites and/or Populations • Investigate options for linking, enhancing or establishing additional populations. • Undertake appropriate seed collection and storage. • Implement national translocation protocols (Vallee et al., 2004) if establishing additional populations is considered necessary and feasible. This list does not necessarily encompass all actions that may be of benefit to Laterite Mallee, but highlights those that are considered to be of highest priority at the time of preparing the conservation advice. Existing Plans/Management Prescriptions that are Relevant to the Species • Lesueur National Park and Coomallo Nature Reserve 1995–2005 Management Plan (CALM, 1995), and • Threat Abatement Plan for Dieback Caused by the Root-Rot Fungus Phytophthora cinnamomi (EA, 2001), as this species may be susceptible to this fungus. These were the most current prescriptions at the time of publishing; please refer to the relevant agency’s website for any updated versions. Information Sources: Brooker, MIH & Hopper, SD 1986, ‘Notes on informal subgenus “Monocalyptus” of Eucalyptus’, Nuytsia, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 346-351. Brown, A, Thomson-Dans, C & Marchant, N (Eds.) 1998, Western Australia's Threatened Flora, Department of Conservation & Land Management, Como, WA, p. 44. Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) 1995, Lesueur National Park and Coomallo Nature Reserve 1995–2005 Management Plan, National Parks & Nature Conservation Authority, Perth, Western Australia. Environment Australia (EA) 2001, Threat Abatement Plan For Dieback caused by the root-rot fungus Phytophthora cinnamomi, Environment Australia, viewed 11 March 2008, <http://www.environment.gov.au/ biodiversity/threatened/publications/tap/phytophthora/pubs/phytophthora.pdf>. Napier, A, Taylor, A & Hopper, S 1988, Survey of rare and poorly known eucalypts of Western Australia. Field Guide No. 3, Greenough region, Dept. of Conservation & Land Management, Como, WA pp. 43-44 Patrick, SJ & Brown, AP 2001, Declared Rare and Poorly Known Flora in the Moora District, Western Australian Wildlife Management Program No. 28, Department of Conservation & Land Management, Como, pp. 81-82. Vallee, L, Hogbin, T, Monks, L, Makinson, B, Matthes, M & Rossetto, M 2004, Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia (2nd ed.), Australian Network for Plant Conservation, Canberra. Eucalyptus lateritica Conservation Advice - Page 3 of 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Interim Recovery Plan 2004-2009
    INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 164 DANDARAGAN MALLEE (EUCALYPTUS DOLOROSA) INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN 2004-2009 Gillian Stack1, Gina Broun2 & Val English3 1 Project Officer, WA Threatened Species and Communities Unit, CALM, PO Box 51 Wanneroo, 6946. 2 Flora Conservation Officer, CALM’s Moora District, PO Box 638, Jurien Bay 6516. 3 Acting Senior Ecologist, Threatened Species and Communities Unit, CALM, PO Box 51 Wanneroo, 6946. Photograph: S.D. Hopper June 2004 Department of Conservation and Land Management Western Australian Threatened Species and Communities Unit (WATSCU) PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6946 Interim Recovery Plan for Eucalyptus dolorosa FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. CALM is committed to ensuring that Critically Endangered taxa are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the Minister. This Interim Recovery Plan will operate from June 2004 to May 2009 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the taxon is still ranked Critically Endangered, this IRP will be reviewed after five years and the need for a full Recovery Plan assessed. This IRP was given regional approval on 4 June, 2004 and was approved by the Director of Nature Conservation on 22 June, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Advice Eucalyptus Dolorosa
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister’s delegate approved this conservation advice on 01/10/2015 Conservation Advice Eucalyptus dolorosa Dandaragan mallee Conservation Status Eucalyptus dolorosa (Dandaragan mallee) is listed as Endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act). The species is eligible for listing as Endangered as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as Endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). The main factors that are the cause of the species being eligible for listing in the Endangered category are restricted extent of occurrence, area of occupancy and peredicted declines in population through slow seed recruitment (CALM, 2004). Description Dandaragan mallee is a low mallee to 2.5 m tall with stout stems and rough grey bark on the older stems. The juvenile leaves are broadly falcate, and light bluish-grey in colour. The adult leaves are slightly glossy, green in colour, lanceolate to falcate, measuring 10 x 2 cm and have a moderately dense vein network and numerous oil glands. The flowers are clustered at the leafless ends of branchlets, appearing to be terminal. There are 7 flowers in each cluster. The buds have pedicels up to 1 cm long and are rhomboid in shape, 9 x 6 mm with a slightly beaked operculum. The stamens are very numerous. The fruits have stalks to 7 mm long, and are cup- shaped to globose, measure 1 x 1.4 cm, and have four valves.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Recovery Plan 2004-2009
    INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO.189 SCALY-BUTT MALLEE (EUCALYPTUS LEPROPHLOIA) INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN 2004-2009 Gillian Stack and Gina Broun Photograph: Andrew Crawford December 2004 Department of Conservation and Land Management Western Australian Threatened Species and Communities Unit (WATSCU) PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6946 Interim Recovery Plan for Eucalyptus leprophloia FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. CALM is committed to ensuring that Critically Endangered taxa are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the Minister. This Interim Recovery Plan will operate from December 2004 to November 2009 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that this IRP will be reviewed after five years. This IRP was given Regional approval on 20 December 2004 and approved by the Director of Nature Conservation on 2 February 2005. The allocation of staff time and provision of funds identified in this Interim Recovery Plan is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting CALM, as well as the need
    [Show full text]
  • Declared Rare and Poorly Known Flora in the Warren Region 2006
    Declared Rare and Poorly Known Flora in the Warren Region Roger W. Hearn, Rachel Meissner, Andrew P. Brown, Terry D. Macfarlane and Tony R. Annels 2006 WESTERN AUSTRALIAN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM NO. 40 Published jointly by Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 636, Canberra, ACT 2601 Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983 This study (EA ESP Project 440) was funded by the Australian Government’s Natural Heritage Trust. Property and copyright of this document is vested jointly in the Assistant Secretary, Natural Resource Management Policy Branch, Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage, and the Executive Director, WA Department of Conservation and Land Management. The Commonwealth disclaims responsibility for the views expressed. ©Department of Conservation and Land Management, Western Australia 2006 ISSN 0816-9713 Cover Photograph by Erica Shedley – the declared rare flora species Caladenia winfieldii which is known from a single population in the Warren Region. Other photographs by Roger Hearn. Editor......................................................... E. Shedley Maps.......................................................... R. Meissner Production and distribution....................... CALM Strategic Development and Corporate Affairs Division ii FOREWORD Western Australian Wildlife Management Programs are a series of publications produced by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM).
    [Show full text]
  • Dean Nicolle Nicolle D (2015) Classification of the Eucalyptsa ( Ngophora, Eucalypts Corymbia and Eucalyptus) Version 2
    Cite as: CLASSIFICATION OF THE Dean Nicolle Nicolle D (2015) Classification of the eucalypts A( ngophora, EUCALYPTS Corymbia and Eucalyptus) Version 2. (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) Web Version 2 | April 2015 http://www.dn.com.au/Classification-Of-The-Eucalypts.pdf Taxonomy Genus (common name, if any) Subgenus (common name, if any) Section (common name, if any) Series (common name, if any) Subseries (common name, if any) Species (common name, if any) Subspecies (common name, if any) ? = dubious or poorly understood taxon requiring further investigation [ ] = Hybrid or intergrade taxon (only recently described or well-known hybrid names are listed) MS = unpublished manuscript name Natural distribution (regions listed in order from most to least common) WA Western Australia NT Northern Territory SA South Australia Qld Queensland NSW New South Wales Vic Victoria Tas Tasmania PNG Papua New Guinea (including New Britain) Indo Indonesia ET East Timor Phil Philippines ? = dubious or unverified records Research O Observed in wild by D.Nicolle C Specimens Collected in wild by D.Nicolle G Grown at Currency Creek Arboretum (number of provenances grown) (m) = reproductively mature. Where multiple provenances have been grown, (m) is indicated where at least one provenance is reproductively mature. – (#) = provenances have been grown at CCA, but the taxon is no longer alive – (#)m = at least one provenance has been grown to maturity at CCA, but the taxon is no longer alive Synonyms (common known and recently named synonyms only) Taxon name ? = indicates possible synonym/dubious taxon D. Nicolle, Classification of the eucalypts Angophora( , Corymbia and Eucalyptus) 2 Angophora (apples) E. subg. Angophora ser.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Melbourne's Future Urban Forest
    TheThe CitCityy ofof Melbourne’sMelbourne’s 5dcdaTDaQP]5^aTbc5dcdaTDaQP]5^aTbc Identifying vulnerability to future temperatures Authors: Dave Kendal, Jess Baumann Burnley Campus School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences The University of Melbourne 500 Yarra Boulevard VIC 3010 AUSTRALIA T: +61 3 8344 0267 Contact: [email protected] Epert advice from Stephen Frank, Steve Livesley, Peter Symes, Anna Foley, David Reid, Peter May, Ian Shears and David Callow. First printed June 2016. Published online November 2016 by the Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub: http:// www.nespurban.edu.au/publications-resources/research-reports/ CAULRR02_CoMFutureUrbanForest_Nov2016.pdf The Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub is funded under the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme with a mission to take a comprehensive view of the sustainability and liveability of urban environments. © The City of Melbourne 2016. Executive Summary Climate change is likely to have a significant effect on many trees in the City of Melbourne. Some species will perform better, while some will perform worse. The report describes the results of a project exploring the vulnerability of tree species currently planted in the City of Melbourne, and identifies some potential new species that may be more suitable for the City’s climate futures. A list of species combining those currently in the City of Melbourne’s urban forest with those being newly planted in the City of Melbourne was created. The global locations where species occur naturally and are in cultivation (and abundance where available) were compiled from existing datasets, such as ‘open data’ tree inventories and extracted from other published data, from approximately 200 cities around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Desktop Study (Summary) Attachment B
    ENVIRONMENTAL DESKTOP STUDY (SUMMARY) ATTACHMENT B Project: UIL Energy 2D Seismic survey, Onshore, Perth Basin, WA Document Information Onshore, Shire of Dandaragan and Shire Operation area Document No UIL Desktop Study of Coorow, WA Revision 4.0 Last revision date October 2015 Register of Amendments Rev Description Date Prepared by 1.0 Initial Draft July 2013 L. Volkova 2.0 Updates and Amendments 2013-2015 L. Volkova 3.0 Final Summary Report for release to DotE August 2015 L.Volkova 4.0 Updates October 2015 L.Volkova 2 Table of contents 1. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 CLIMATE AND LAND USE ................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 FIRE REGIME ........................................................................................................................................ 6 1.3 SOIL AND LANDFORMS ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER ......................................................................................................... 7 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 CONSERVATION AREAS ...................................................................................................................... 7
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Types of the World Map
    Abarema abbottii-Abarema acreana-Abarema adenophora-Abarema alexandri-Abarema asplenifolia-Abarema auriculata-Abarema barbouriana-Abarema barnebyana-Abarema brachystachya-Abarema callejasii-Abarema campestris-Abarema centiflora-Abarema cochleata-Abarema cochliocarpos-Abarema commutata-Abarema curvicarpa-Abarema ferruginea-Abarema filamentosa-Abarema floribunda-Abarema gallorum-Abarema ganymedea-Abarema glauca-Abarema idiopoda-Abarema josephi-Abarema jupunba-Abarema killipii-Abarema laeta-Abarema langsdorffii-Abarema lehmannii-Abarema leucophylla-Abarema levelii-Abarema limae-Abarema longipedunculata-Abarema macradenia-Abarema maestrensis-Abarema mataybifolia-Abarema microcalyx-Abarema nipensis-Abarema obovalis-Abarema obovata-Abarema oppositifolia-Abarema oxyphyllidia-Abarema piresii-Abarema racemiflora-Abarema turbinata-Abarema villifera-Abarema villosa-Abarema zolleriana-Abatia mexicana-Abatia parviflora-Abatia rugosa-Abatia spicata-Abelia corymbosa-Abeliophyllum distichum-Abies alba-Abies amabilis-Abies balsamea-Abies beshanzuensis-Abies bracteata-Abies cephalonica-Abies chensiensis-Abies cilicica-Abies concolor-Abies delavayi-Abies densa-Abies durangensis-Abies fabri-Abies fanjingshanensis-Abies fargesii-Abies firma-Abies forrestii-Abies fraseri-Abies grandis-Abies guatemalensis-Abies hickelii-Abies hidalgensis-Abies holophylla-Abies homolepis-Abies jaliscana-Abies kawakamii-Abies koreana-Abies lasiocarpa-Abies magnifica-Abies mariesii-Abies nebrodensis-Abies nephrolepis-Abies nordmanniana-Abies numidica-Abies pindrow-Abies pinsapo-Abies
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Pollution from Farm Forestry Using Eucalypt Species and Hybrids
    Genetic Pollution from Farm Forestry using eucalypt species and hybrids A report for the RIRDC/L&WA/FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program by Brad M. Potts, Robert C. Barbour, Andrew B. Hingston September 2001 RIRDC Publication No 01/114 RIRDC Project No CPF – 3A © 2001 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 642 58336 6 ISSN 1440-6845 The risk of genetic pollution from farm forestry using eucalypt species and hybrids Publication No. 01/114 Project No. CPF – 3A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details (Dr. Brad M. Potts and Robert C. Barbour) (Andrew Hingston,) (CRC for Sustainable Production Forestry, CRC for Sustainable Production Forestry, School of Plant Science, School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, University of Tasmania, G.P.O. Box 252-55, G.P.O. Box 252-78, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia ) Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia ) Phone: 03 62262641 Phone: 03 62262641 Fax: 03 62262698 Fax: 03 62262698 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Vulnerability of Trees to the City's Future Temperature Final
    TheThe CitCityy ofof Melbourne’sMelbourne’s 5dcdaTDaQP]5^aTbc5dcdaTDaQP]5^aTbc Identifying vulnerability to future temperatures Authors: Dave Kendal, Jess Baumann Burnley Campus School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences The University of Melbourne 500 Yarra Boulevard VIC 3010 AUSTRALIA T: +61 3 8344 0267 Contact: [email protected] Epert advice from Stephen Frank, Steve Livesley, Peter Symes, Anna Foley, David Reid, Peter May, Ian Shears and David Callow. First printed June 2016. Published online November 2016 by the Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub: http:// www.nespurban.edu.au/publications-resources/research-reports/ CAULRR02_CoMFutureUrbanForest_Nov2016.pdf The Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub is funded under the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme with a mission to take a comprehensive view of the sustainability and liveability of urban environments. © The City of Melbourne 2016. Executive Summary Climate change is likely to have a significant effect on many trees in the City of Melbourne. Some species will perform better, while some will perform worse. The report describes the results of a project exploring the vulnerability of tree species currently planted in the City of Melbourne, and identifies some potential new species that may be more suitable for the City’s climate futures. A list of species combining those currently in the City of Melbourne’s urban forest with those being newly planted in the City of Melbourne was created. The global locations where species occur naturally and are in cultivation (and abundance where available) were compiled from existing datasets, such as ‘open data’ tree inventories and extracted from other published data, from approximately 200 cities around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGEMENT PLAN Lesueur National Park and Coomallo Nature
    MANAGEMENT PLAN Lesueur National Park and Coomallo Nature Reserve 1995 - 2005 Department of Conservation and Land Management for the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority Perth, Western Australia, 1995 PREFACE All national parks, conservation parks, marine parks, nature reserves and marine nature reserves in Western Australia are vested in the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority (NPNCA), and managed by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). The NPNCA is responsible for the preparation of management plans for all lands and waters that are vested in it. CALM prepares the plans on their behalf on a regional and area basis, and prepares plans for individual areas on a priority basis. The NPNCA issues draft plans for public comment and provides a final plan for approval by the Minister for the Environment. According to the CALM Act (1984), management plans should contain: • a statement of the policies or guidelines proposed to be followed; and • a summary of operations proposed to be undertaken, for a specified period not exceeding 10 years. In accordance with Section 55 of the Act, the term of this plan will be for 10 years but a review may take place within the term of the plan. A draft management plan for Lesueur National Park and Coomallo Nature Reserve was released for public comment. After consideration of public submissions, the NPNCA submitted this revised plan to the Minister for the Environment for approval. The Minister for the Environment approved this document as the Management Plan for Lesueur National Park and Coomallo Nature Reserve on 25 September 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Agricultural, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]