DOCSLIB.ORG

Adelaide-And-Mount-Lofty-Ranges.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REGIONAL RECOVERY PLAN for Threatened Species and Ecological Communities of Adelaide and the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia 2009 - 2014 Department for Environment and Heritage FIS 80034 www.environment.sa.gov.au 80034 Recovery cover FINAL.indd 1 7/7/09 11:22:19 AM ,6%1 'HSDUWPHQWIRU(QYLURQPHQW +HULWDJH*32%R[$GHODLGH -XQH &RYHUGHVLJQDQGSKRWRJUDSK\ &RYHUGHVLJQE\'(+&RUSRUDWH&RPPXQLFDWLRQV%UDQFK%HDXWLIXOILUHWDLO 6WDJRQRSOHXUDEHOOD SKRWR E\ 'DYLG3DWRQ 5HVWRUHG JUH\ ER[ (XFDO\SWXVPLFURFDUSD JUDVV\ZRRGODQG SKRWR E\'DYLG 5REHUWVRQ IURP5HVWRUDWLRQRI*UDVV\:RRGODQG²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cknowledgements The preparation of the Recovery Plan would not have been possible without the input of many people. The authors are especially indebted to the following for their significant contribution: Members of the Project’s Steering Committee: Adrian Stokes (DEH - Chair), Andrew Chalklen (AGDEWHA), David Turner (DEH), Dominic Nicholls (TSN), Hafiz Stewart (DEH), Jody Gates (DEH), Marcus Walters (LGA), Penny Paton (AMLR Board), Peter Copley (DEH), Vicki-Jo Russell (TSN) and Wendy Stubbs (DEH). Other DEH staff who have provided valuable expertise and assistance: Alan Lambert, Amelia Hurren, Andrew Graham, Andrew West, Angela Duffy, Ann Prescott, Bill Barker, Chris Holden, Dan Duval, Dave Armstrong, David Thompson, Doug Bickerton, Helen Vonow, Maria Johns, Martin Oleary, Jason van Weenen, Jean Turner, Joe Quarmby, Kate Smith, Kirstin Long, Kirsty Bevan, Lisa Farroway, Mike Wouters, Peter Lang, Robyn Barker, Sandy Carruthers, Sandy Kinnear, Sonia Croft, Sue Graham and Tim Croft. Others who have provided valuable expertise and information: Alys Stevens (SEWFPSRP), Bea Hurrell (DEH), Bob Bates (NOSSA), Caroline Dorr (AMLRNRMB), Cathy Houston (NOSSA), Ceridwen Synnot (DWLBC), David Paton (University of Adelaide), Denzel Murfet, Donna-Lee Edwards (DWLBC), Geoffrey Bradford (EPA), Graham Carpenter (DWLBC), Jason Downs (PIRSA), Jeremiah Smith, Jessica Mitchell (DWLBC), Kieran Brewer, Lynn Baker (NSW DECC), Marcus Pickett (SEWFPSRP), Mark Hutchinson (SAM), Michael Hammer, Robert Henzell (DWLBC), Ron Taylor (FNHCP), Rosemary Taplin and Tim Jury (TPAG). Members of the AMLR NRM Four Nations Governance Group. Members of the Commonwealth Threatened Species Scientific Committee. Those who have provided photos for use in this document. The majority of funding support was provided by the Australian Government through the Natural Heritage Trust, administered by the AMLRNRMB. Additional funding and in-kind support was provided by DEH. The authors acknowledge the past and present Aboriginal custodians of the land within the AMLR and South Australia, valuing their knowledge and understanding of the region’s natural heritage. i Executive Summary Background to this plan Traditionally, recovery plans have been prepared for individual species or groups of species (multi- species plans). However, a more strategic and integrated approach to threatened species recovery and threat abatement is being explored through regional pilot projects such as this one. A detailed review of over 500 regionally threatened flora and vertebrate fauna species (excluding invertebrate fauna and marine species occurring approximately below the high water mark) resulted in the inclusion of 203 species and subspecies in this plan. Eighteen threatened terrestrial ecological communities occurring in the AMLR were also reviewed and prioritised, including three ecological communities listed under the EPBC Act. Marine species (occurring approximately below the high water mark) and invertebrate species have been excluded from this planning process. A key element of this recovery plan is to attempt increased integration of regional scale threat abatement activities for improved threatened species and ecological community recovery. Hence, unlike most traditional multi-species recovery plans, management actions have not been devised for individual species, but rather across species. Management actions have been derived from a series of species-based analyses (e.g. relating to threats, knowledge gaps and impediments to recovery). This plan has been prepared aiming to comply with the revised guidelines for preparing a recovery plan for adoption under the EPBC Act.19 This plan is aligned with relevant State and regional planning documents, including: No Species Loss, A Nature Conservation Strategy for South Australia 2007-201710 Natural Resources Management Plan for the AMLR Region1 Draft Biodiversity Strategy for Adelaide and the Mount Lofty Ranges13, and Other threatened species and ecological community recovery plans. This plan is divided into three parts: The main body of the plan, which includes the background to the plan and the region, a summary of the planning methodology, summarised results of the prioritisation and threat analysis processes, proposed management objectives and actions. The appendices to the plan (contained on the accompanying CD) are divided into two parts. Appendices Part A includes supplementary information, detailed analyses results and planning methodology. Appendices Part B includes profiles (with information, map and photo) for each of the 203 species in the plan for users requiring more specific information. Background to the region The AMLR is a complex and biologically diverse region covering 780,626 hectares. The regional boundary adopted for this plan is based on biogeographical features, derived from the Draft Biodiversity Strategy for Adelaide and the Mount Lofty Ranges.13 The region crosses NRM regional boundaries, incorporating the Adelaide and AMLRNRMB area and the western flank of the SA Murray Darling Basin NRM Board (SAMDBNRMB) region. The AMLR supports nine broad structural vegetation groups; Heathy Open Forest, Heathy Woodland, Grassy Woodland, Mallee, Grassland, Riparian, Wetland, Shrublands and Coastal. Over 450 native fauna species and 1500 native vascular plant species have been recorded in the region.13 The habitats of the AMLR, and the plants and animals that use them are isolated from similar higher- rainfall habitats in the south-east and south-west of the continent. The woodland and forest habitats of the AMLR are effectively an island surrounded by ocean to the south and west and the more arid woodland and mallee habitats to the north and east. As a result, the region supports a number of species and subspecies which are endemic or have the core of their State’s distribution within the region. ii Plan methodology A custom planning model was devised for this plan incorporating a series of information reviews and analyses in relation to species inclusion, threat analysis, species prioritisation, ecological community prioritisation, knowledge gaps and impediments to recovery. There are several limitations acknowledged in the plan relating to the analyses. The threatened species and ecological communities Many species have become extinct in the AMLR region, and a range of threatened species that may still be extant are considered ‘functionally extinct’. The species and subspecies included in this plan are considered threatened and are currently declining or have already declined to critical levels, where they are at risk of becoming either locally extinct or for endemics extinct across their whole range. Of the 130 flora species and 73 fauna species included in this plan, 18 are endemic to the AMLR (including subspecies). Thirty five of the species in this plan are listed as nationally threatened under the EPBC Act, and 149 species are listed as threatened under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 (NPW Act)14. Fifty of the species are not listed as threatened under State or National legislation. Most of the species included in this plan have restricted and/or fragmented distributions within the AMLR. Some species have wider distributions within the AMLR, but their populations are considered to be declining. Many others have small population sizes and/or a limited number of sub-populations. Many species are considered disjunct from the remainder of their ranges, or are part of a limited distribution within the State. Not all threatened species which occur in AMLR that have a legislative conservation rating have been selected to be included in this plan. Due the regional focus of the plan,
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity

    Biodiversity

    Biodiversity KEY5 FACTS as hunting), as pasture grasses or as aquarium species Introduced (in the case of some marine species). They have also • Introduced species are been introduced accidentally, such as in shipments of recognised as a leading Species imported grain or in ballast water. cause of biodiversity loss Introduced plants, or weeds, can invade and world-wide. compete with native plant species for space, light, Trends water and nutrients and because of their rapid growth rates they can quickly smother native vegetation. • Rabbit numbers: a DECLINE since Similarly to weeds, many introduced animals compete introduction of Rabbit Haemorrhagic with and predate on native animals and impact on Disease (RHD, also known as calicivirus) native vegetation. They have high reproductive rates although the extent of the decline varies and can tolerate a wide range of habitats. As a result across the State. they often establish populations very quickly. •Fox numbers: DOWN in high priority Weeds can provide shelter for pest animals, conservation areas due to large-scale although they can provide food for or become habitat baiting programs; STILL A PROBLEM in for native animals. Blackberry, for example, is an ideal other parts of the State. habitat for the threatened Southern Brown Bandicoot. This illustrates the complexity of issues associated •Feral camel and deer numbers: UP. with pest control and highlights the need for control •Feral goat numbers: DECLINING across measures to have considered specific conservation Weed affected land – Mount Lofty Ranges the State. outcomes to be undertaken over time and to be Photo: Kym Nicolson •Feral pig numbers: UNKNOWN.
  • A Biological Survey of the Southern Mount Lofty Ranges

    A Biological Survey of the Southern Mount Lofty Ranges

    Southern Mount Lofty Ranges Biological Survey APPENDIX I DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS OCCURRING IN SURVEY REGION BOUNDARY. Part 1. Environmental associations in study area occurring within FLEURIEU IBRA sub-region Environmental Total % of Description Association Area vegetation (ha) remaining 3.2.1 Mt. Rapid 12,763 3.9 Hills and ridges on interbedded shale and arkose, locally overlain by tillite. Relict fans form broad flat surfaces near Cape Jervis where some coastal cliffs occur. Open parkland with sown pasture is used for livestock grazing. The scenery of the coastline is dominated by tall cliffs that vary in form and steepness, the amount of rock outcrop and vegetative cover. 3.2.2 Deep Creek 12,984 30.2 A long dissected ridge of phyllite and greywacke with cliffs, or beaches and dunes along the coastline. The cover is predominantly open parkland over sown pasture with widespread remnants of woodland and forest. Inland views tend to be middle-ground panoramic, featuring grassy ridge crests and valley floors with bracken and reed or remnant forest vegetation. 3.2.3 Fleurieu 30,389 15.6 An undulating to hilly dissected tableland on lateritized sandstone. There is a mixed cover of open parkland, forest plantation and woodland. 3.2.4 Inman 37,130 4.4 A series of low dissected ridges and spurs on tillite and arkose, with dunes and beaches or Valley cliffs along the coast. The cover is open parkland over sown pastures and cereal crops. 3.2.5 Bob Tiers 15,761 21.3 Ridges on schist and gneiss with dissected slopes and remnantsof laterite-capped tableland.
  • Broken Hill Complex

    Broken Hill Complex

    Broken Hill Complex Bioregion resources Photo Mulyangarie, DEH Broken Hill Complex The Broken Hill Complex bioregion is located in western New South Wales and eastern South Australia, spanning the NSW-SA border. It includes all of the Barrier Ranges and covers a huge area of nearly 5.7 million hectares with approximately 33% falling in South Australia! It has an arid climate with dry hot summers and mild winters. The average rainfall is 222mm per year, with slightly more rainfall occurring in summer. The bioregion is rich with Aboriginal cultural history, with numerous archaeological sites of significance. Biodiversity and habitat The bioregion consists of low ranges, and gently rounded hills and depressions. The main vegetation types are chenopod and samphire shrublands; casuarina forests and woodlands and acacia shrublands. Threatened animal species include the Yellow-footed Rock- wallaby and Australian Bustard. Grazing, mining and wood collection for over 100 years has led to a decline in understory plant species and cover, affecting ground nesting birds and ground feeding insectivores. 2 | Broken Hill Complex Photo by Francisco Facelli Broken Hill Complex Threats Threats to the Broken Hill Complex bioregion and its dependent species include: For Further information • erosion and degradation caused by overgrazing by sheep, To get involved or for more information please cattle, goats, rabbits and macropods phone your nearest Natural Resources Centre or • competition and predation by feral animals such as rabbits, visit www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au
  • Forestrysa Cudlee Creek Forest Trails Fire Recovery Strategy

    Forestrysa Cudlee Creek Forest Trails Fire Recovery Strategy

    ForestrySA Cudlee Creek Forest Trails Fire Recovery Strategy November 2020 Adelaide Mountain Bike Club Gravity Enduro South Australia Human Projectiles Mountain Bike Club Inside Line Downhill Mountain Bike Club Acknowledgements ForestrySA would like to take the opportunity to acknowledge the achievement of those involved in the long history of the Cudlee Creek Trails including a number of ForestrySA managers, coordinators and rangers, staff from other Government agencies such as Primary Industries SA, Office for Recreation, Sport and Racing, Department for Environment and Water and the Adelaide Hills Council. Bike SA has played a key role in the development of this location since the early 2000s and input provided from the current and former Chief Executives is acknowledged. Nick Bowman has provided a significant input to the development of this location as a mountain bike destination. Volunteer support and coordination provided by Brad Slade from the Human Projectiles MTB Club, other club members and the Foxy Creakers have also been a significant help. ForestrySA also acknowledges the support from Inside Line MTB Club, the Adelaide Mountain Bike Club and more recently the Gravity Enduro MTB Club and all other volunteers and anyone who has assisted with trail development, auditing , maintenance and event management over many years. This report was prepared by TRC Tourism for ForestrySA in relation to the development of the Cudlee Creek Forest Trails Fire Recovery Strategy Disclaimer Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith but on the basis that TRC Tourism Pty. Ltd., directors, employees and associated entities are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to in this document.
  • National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF

    National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF

    Version: 1.7.2015 South Australia National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 An Act to provide for the establishment and management of reserves for public benefit and enjoyment; to provide for the conservation of wildlife in a natural environment; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1—Preliminary 1 Short title 5 Interpretation Part 2—Administration Division 1—General administrative powers 6 Constitution of Minister as a corporation sole 9 Power of acquisition 10 Research and investigations 11 Wildlife Conservation Fund 12 Delegation 13 Information to be included in annual report 14 Minister not to administer this Act Division 2—The Parks and Wilderness Council 15 Establishment and membership of Council 16 Terms and conditions of membership 17 Remuneration 18 Vacancies or defects in appointment of members 19 Direction and control of Minister 19A Proceedings of Council 19B Conflict of interest under Public Sector (Honesty and Accountability) Act 19C Functions of Council 19D Annual report Division 3—Appointment and powers of wardens 20 Appointment of wardens 21 Assistance to warden 22 Powers of wardens 23 Forfeiture 24 Hindering of wardens etc 24A Offences by wardens etc 25 Power of arrest 26 False representation [3.7.2015] This version is not published under the Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002 1 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972—1.7.2015 Contents Part 3—Reserves and sanctuaries Division 1—National parks 27 Constitution of national parks by statute 28 Constitution of national parks by proclamation 28A Certain co-managed national
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project

    Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project

    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
  • Prescribed Water Resources Areas Prescribed Surface Water Areas BORDERTOWN Baroota Morambro Creek

    Prescribed Water Resources Areas Prescribed Surface Water Areas BORDERTOWN Baroota Morambro Creek

    PORT AUGUSTA # # STREAKY BAY South Australian Arid Lands South Australian Arid Lands # WHYALLA KIMBA # # PORT PIRIE NEW SOUTH WALES Eyre Peninsula # ELLISTON CLEVE # # WALLAROO Northern and Yorke # PORT WAKEFIELD # WAIKERIE RENMARK # SPENCER GULF NORTHERN TERRITORY QUEENSLAND BLANCHETOWN # Chapmans Creek Intake ! GAWLER Far North # Middle Beach Intake ! South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Prescribed Wells Area PORT LINCOLN # ! Gawler River WESTERN Northern Intake AUSTRALIA Little Para # # WAROOKA ADELAIDE Dry Creek PWA Adelaide and Mt Lofty Ranges NEW River Torrens - Karrawirra Parri MURRAY BRIDGE SOUTH # WALES Onkaparinga River L a k e A l e x a n d r i n a CAPE JERVIS # # KINGSCOTE L a k e A l b e r t VICTORIA Kangaroo Island See large map for details VICTORIA SOUTHERN OCEAN Prescribed Water Resources Areas Prescribed Surface Water Areas BORDERTOWN Baroota Morambro Creek # Barossa Valley Clare Valley Notice of Intent to Prescribe Morambro Creek and Nyroca Channel Eastern Mount Lofty Ranges Upper Wakefield Prescribed Watercourses including Cockatoo Lake Marne River and Saunders Creek SOUTH AUSTRALIA Western Mount Lofty Ranges Prescribed Watercourses PRESCRIBED WATER RESOURCES River Murray Prescribed Wells Areas ! Chapmans Creek Intake Status at 1st July 2012 South East Angas-Bremer Gawler River NARACOORTE # Central Adelaide Little Para Dry Creek ! Middle Beach Intake ´ Far North Morambro Creek and Nyroca Channel # Prescribed Watercourses including 0 20 40 60 80 100 km ROBE Lower Limestone Coast Cockatoo Lake ! Northern Intake Mallee
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory

    ACT, Australian Capital Territory

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Species of Interest in Braxton Mire

    Species of Interest in Braxton Mire

    Species of Interest in Braxton Mire Table of Contents Introduction 1 Aporostylis bifolia 2 Bulbinella angustifolia 3 Carpha alpina 4 Celmisia gracilenta 5 Chionochloa rubra subsp. cuprea 6 Coprosma rugosa 7 Dracophyllum longifolium var. longifolium 8 Drosera spatulata 9 Empodisma minus 10 Gaultheria macrostigma 11 Gleichenia dicarpa 12 Herpolirion novae­zelandiae 13 Leptospermum scoparium var. scoparium 14 Lobelia angulata 15 Machaerina tenax 16 Oreobolus pectinatus 17 Thelymitra cyanea 18 Glossary 19 Made on the New Zealand Plant Conservation Network website – www.nzpcn.org.nz Copyright All images used in this book remain copyright of the named photographer. Any reproduction, retransmission, republication, or other use of all or part of this book is expressly prohibited, unless prior written permission has been granted by the New Zealand Plant Conservation Network ([email protected]). All other rights reserved. © 2017 New Zealand Plant Conservation Network Introduction About the Network This book was compiled from information stored on the The Network has more than 800 members worldwide and is website of the New Zealand Plant Conservation Network New Zealand's largest non­governmental organisation solely (www.nzpcn.org.nz). devoted to the protection and restoration of New Zealand's indigenous plant life. This website was established in 2003 as a repository for information about New Zealand's threatened vascular The vision of the New Zealand Plant Conservation Network is plants. Since then it has grown into a national database of that 'no indigenous species of plant will become extinct nor be information about all plants in the New Zealand botanic placed at risk of extinction as a result of human action or region including both native and naturalised vascular indifference, and that the rich, diverse and unique plant life of plants, threatened mosses, liverworts and fungi.
  • WRP Plant List Update 2020 October.Xlsx

    WRP Plant List Update 2020 October.Xlsx

    Indigenous & Introduced Species Woowookarung Regional Park plant list Prepared by Field Natualists Club of Ballarat 2020 October Total Species 321 Weed Species* 104 Scientific Name Common Name Acacia aculeatissima Snake Wattle Acacia baileyeana* Cootamundra Wattle Acacia dealbata Silver Wattle Acacia decurrens* Early Black Wattle Acacia howittii* Sticky Wattle Acacia lanigera Woolly Wattle Acacia longifolia var longifolia* Sallow Wattle Acacia longifolia var sophorae* Sallow Wattle Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood Acacia mearnsii Late Black Wattle Acacia myrtifolia Myrtle Wattle Acacia paradoxa Hedge Wattle Acacia podalyriifolia Queensland Silver Wattle Acacia provincialis Wirilda Acacia pycnantha Golden Wattle Acacia stricta Hop Wattle Acacia verniciflua Varnish Wattle Acacia verticillata Prickly Moses Acaena echinata Sheep’s Burr Acaena novae-zelandiae Bidgee widgee Acaena ovina Sheep’s Burr Acetosella vulgaris Sheep Sorrel Acianthus exsertus Mosquito Orchid Acrotriche prostrata Trailing Ground-berry Acrotriche serrulata Honeypots Agrostis capillaris* Brown-top Bent Aira carophyllea* Silvery Hair-grass Allocasuarina litoralis Black Sheoak Amyema pendula subsp. pendula Drooping Mistletoe Anthosachne scabra Common Wheat-grass Anthoxanthum odoratum* Sweet Vernal Grass Arbutus unedo* Irish Strawberry Tree Arctotheca calendula* Capeweed Arthropodium milleflorum Pale Vanilla-lily Arthropodium strictum Chocolate Lily Arum italicum* Italian Arum Asperula scoparia Prickly Woodruff Astroloma humifusum Cranberry Heath Austrostipa mollis Soft Spear-grass
  • Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: a Practical Guide for Field Botanists

    Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: a Practical Guide for Field Botanists

    Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists 0 Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists FOREWORD This document fills a significant gap in the Tasmanian orchid literature. Given the inherent difficulties in locating and surveying orchids in their natural habitat, an accurate guide to their flowering times will be an invaluable tool to field botanists, consultants and orchid enthusiasts alike. Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists has been developed by Tasmania’s leading orchid experts, drawing collectively on many decades of field experience. The result is the most comprehensive State reference on orchid flowering available. By virtue of its ease of use, accessibility and identification of accurate windows for locating our often-cryptic orchids, it will actually assist in conservation by enabling land managers and consultants to more easily comply with the survey requirements of a range of land-use planning processes. The use of this guide will enhance efforts to locate new populations and increase our understanding of the distribution of orchid species. The Threatened Species Section commends this guide and strongly recommends its use as a reference whenever surveys for orchids are undertaken. Matthew Larcombe Project Officer (Threatened Orchid and Euphrasia) Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment March 2008 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY This document is available as a PDF file downloadable from the following websites: www.fpa.tas.gov.au www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au www.ecotas.com.au It may also be requested directly from the authors (see contact details below).