Altruism, Empathy, and Efficacy: the Science Behind Engaging Supporters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Altruism, Empathy, and Efficacy: the Science Behind Engaging Supporters ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY 0 ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY ABOUT THE PUBLISHER Georgetown University’s Center for Social Impact Communication (CSIC) is a research and action center dedicated to increasing social impact through the power of marketers, communicators, fundraisers and journalists working together. As part of the University’s School of Continuing Studies, the Center accomplishes its mission of educating and inspiring practitioners and students through applied research, graduate courses, community collaborations and thought leadership. To contact the Center, please email [email protected] or visit us online at http://csic.georgetown.edu/. ABOUT THIS GUIDE What you have in your hands is part applied literature review and part hypothesis on how we can better motivate audiences to support nonprofit causes, using the research of social scientists and the experience of social impact practitioners alike. Social impact practitioners can take many forms. They can be fundraisers working at a nonprofit or social marketers working on one of the many government-funded behavior change programs. They can be communicators working for socially-driven companies or even journalists working for cause-driven media outlets. But ultimately this guide is designed to help you—under whatever label best suits you— to make better decisions in how to talk to your supporters. The social impact space, much like the marketing and communications industry at large, is filled with cautionary tales from “gut” marketers who make decisions based on what they think will work best, instead of what we know will work best based on the science of human behavior and the measuring of past performance. With this in mind, every effort has been made to ground this guide in both academic literature and the pragmatic, measured experience of dozens of social impact practitioners—the communicators, marketers, and fundraisers who spend their lives activating audiences to support causes. The social impact space is a living, evolving industry, wherein best practices have been forged from thousands of individual experiences and immeasurable hours of social science into one conversation. 1 ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY As a result, at Georgetown University’s Center for Social Impact Communication, we encourage you to challenge what you see here—to put the best practices from this guide through the filter of your experience and pull up the 100+ sources cited here to make your own decisions. With each experience and measure added to the conversation, the social impact sector becomes measurably stronger. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Evan C. Parker is a Fellow with Georgetown University’s Center for Social Impact Communication and a Lecturer within the University’s School of Continuing Studies, where he teaches a course on how to activate audiences to support causes and nonprofits. In his free-time, Evan serves as the Senior Vice President for Clients and Accounts at EveryAction, the online software from NGP VAN used by thousands of nonprofits for fundraising, organizing, and engaging supporters. 2 ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY TABLE OF CONTENTS About the Publisher ............................................................................................................ 1 About this Guide ................................................................................................................. 1 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 1: YOUR NONPROFIT IS JUST A TOOL IN YOUR SUPPORTER'S TOOLBOX ...................................................................... 5 Assumptions, Meet the Real World ................................................................................ 6 The Attention Economy .................................................................................................. 7 What Does This Mean for My Nonprofit? ....................................................................... 8 The Science Behind Support for Causes .......................................................................... 9 Prosocial Behavior and Nonprofit Organizations ........................................................... 9 What Drives Support for Causes and Nonprofits? ....................................................... 11 Your Organization is the Means, not the Ends ............................................................ 13 What You Can Do: Connect Authentically With Your Audience ..................................... 14 #1. Change the Protagonist of Your Organization’s Story........................................... 15 #2. Use Research to Get the Right Message to the Right People at the Right Time ... 6 CHAPTER 2: ALTRUISM: YOUR SUPPORTERS' MOTIVES AREN'T AS PURE AS YOU MAY THINK ....................................................................20 Selfish vs. Selfless ........................................................................................................ 21 The Science Behind Basic Human Values ...................................................................... 22 Why Does Universalism Dominate Social Impact Communications? ......................... 24 Other Not-So-Pure Altruisms ........................................................................................ 26 What You Can Do: Let Your Supporters be a Little Bit Selfish ....................................... 28 #1. Appeal to “Other” Human Values ........................................................................... 30 #2. Don’t Confuse Public Posturing with Supporter Motivation ................................... 31 CHAPTER 3: EMPATHY: GETTING PEOPLE TO FEEL IS AS IMPORTANT AS GETTING THEM TO THINK .........................................37 The Science Behind Empathy .......................................................................................... 39 Empathy Drives Prosocial Behavior ............................................................................. 40 Language that Drives Empathy .................................................................................... 40 How Do We Trigger Empathy? ..................................................................................... 44 What You Can Do: Use Empathy to Authentically Motivate Your Supporters ............... 46 #1. Tell Better Stories ................................................................................................... 47 #2. Don’t Overwhelm Your Audiences ......................................................................... 51 3 ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY CHAPTER FOUR: EFFICACY: HELP SUPPORTERS FEEL THEY'RE HAVING IMPACT.....................................................................................58 The Science Behind Supporters’ Decision-Making ......................................................... 59 Prerequisites for Prosocial Decisions........................................................................... 62 The Types of Efficacy ................................................................................................... 62 What You Can Do: Show Your Supporter They’ll Have an Impact ................................. 66 #1. Make the Problem Solvable ................................................................................... 67 #2. Stay Positive, Avoiding Maladaptive Responses................................................... 69 #3. Report Back as a Way to Say “Thank You” ........................................................... 72 CHAPTER FIVE: THE CASE FOR SUPPORT: DELIVERING YOUR BEST MESSAGE TO YOUR SUPPORTERS .....................................................79 Build a Comprehensive Case for Support ....................................................................... 80 #1. Establish “The Need” .............................................................................................. 81 #2. Introduce Compelling Beneficiaries ....................................................................... 83 #3. Show the Supporter How They Are Essential to the Solution ............................... 85 #4. Demonstrate Urgency ............................................................................................. 87 #5. Use Differentiators to Show Supporters Your Organization is their Best Partner 88 Remember, Ethics Above All Else .........................................................92 Acknowledgements and Methodology ..................................................95 4 ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY CHAPTER ONE YOUR NONPROFIT IS JUST A TOOL IN YOUR SUPPORTER’S TOOLBOX 5 ALTRUISM, EMPATHY & EFFICACY CHAPTER ONE YOUR NONPROFIT IS JUST A TOOL IN YOUR SUPPORTER’S TOOLBOX Every day, social impact practitioners—the marketers, communicators, fundraisers and journalists trying to do good in the world—work to activate audiences based on assumptions the practitioners have about what drives people to support causes. Often these assumptions come from a little bit of experience and a lot of what social scientists call confirmation bias, our tendency to seek out data that confirms what we already believe to be true.1 We also tend to ignore data that upsets our worldview. But it turns out that many of the assumptions we make as practitioners are borne out of sound science. People want to make the world a better place. People can and will be charitable, if they think it’s the right thing to do. People want to feel like
Recommended publications
  • Providing a Roadmap to Citizenship Making
    THE MAGAZINE OF CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA | WINTER 2019 n VOLUME 46 n NUMBER 1 Providing a roadmap to citizenship The Esperanza Center of Catholic Charities of Baltimore Making people feel at home Casa Alitas of Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Keeping families together THE MINISTRY OF FAMILY REUNIFICATION Charities USA (ISSN 0364-0760) is published by Catholic Charities USA. Address all correspondence to the Managing Editor. © 2019 Catholic Charities USA, Alexandria, Virginia. EDITOR’S COLUMN Editorial and Business Office 2050 Ballenger Ave., Suite 400, Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: 703-549-1390 • Fax: 703-549-1656 The Catholic Charities ministry has provided help to unaccompanied www.CatholicCharitiesUSA.org | [email protected] children for more than 100 years, from orphanages in the early 20th century to family reunification services today. Catholic Charities USA is the national office for one of the nation’s largest social service networks. Member agencies and The backgrounds and circumstances of the children have changed institutions nationwide provide vital social services to almost over the years, but Catholic Charities’ commitment to find shelter, 9 million people in need, regardless of their religious, social or economic backgrounds. Catholic Charities USA supports and clothing, healthy food, education and sponsors has never wavered. enhances the work of its members by providing networking opportunities, national advocacy, program development, The summer of 2018 was an especially challenging time when training and consulting and financial benefits. many children travelling with their families from the Northern Triangle Donate Now: 1-800-919-9338 | ccusa.convio.net/support (Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador) were separated from their par- ents because of the administration’s policy to arrest and separate Publisher adults and children who entered the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading a Nonprofit Organization: Tips and Tools for Executive Directors and Team Leaders TABLE of CONTENTS
    STRENGTHENING NONPROFITS: A Capacity Builder’s Resource Library Leading a Nonprofit Organization: Tips and Tools for Executive Directors and Team Leaders TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 4 OPERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ....................................................... 4 Becoming an Executive Director .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Designing, Developing, and Implementing Strategic Plans .......................................................................................... 5 Hiring, Managing, and Retaining Staff ................................................................................................................................... 6 Working with a Board of Directors .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Financial Management and Fundraising .............................................................................................................................. 9 LEADING TEAMS ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Student Success
    TRANSFORMING School Environments OUR VISION For Student Success Weaving SKILLS ROPES Relationships 2018 Annual Report Practices to Help All Students Our Vision for Student Success City Year has always been about nurturing and developing young people, from the talented students we serve to our dedicated AmeriCorps members. We put this commitment to work through service in schools across the country. Every day, our AmeriCorps members help students to develop the skills and mindsets needed to thrive in school and in life, while they themselves acquire valuable professional experience that prepares them to be leaders in their careers and communities. We believe that all students can succeed. Supporting the success of our students goes far beyond just making sure they know how to add fractions or write a persuasive essay—students also need to know how to work in teams, how to problem solve and how to work toward a goal. City Year AmeriCorps members model these behaviors and mindsets for students while partnering with teachers and schools to create supportive learning environments where students feel a sense of belonging and agency as they develop the social, emotional and academic skills that will help them succeed in and out of school. When our children succeed, we all benefit. From Our Leadership Table of Contents At City Year, we are committed to partnering Our 2018 Annual Report tells the story of how 2 What We Do 25 Campaign Feature: with teachers, parents, schools and school City Year AmeriCorps members help students 4 How Students Learn Jeannie & Jonathan Lavine districts, and communities to ensure that all build a wide range of academic and social- 26 National Corporate Partners children have access to a quality education that emotional skills to help them succeed in school 6 Alumni Profile: Andrea Encarnacao Martin 28 enables them to reach their potential, develop and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Client # Name of Nonprofit Organization State of Incorporation Specific Purpose Purpose
    Client # Name of Nonprofit Organization State of Incorporation Specific Purpose Purpose HOLY GARDEN OF PRAYER bring souls to Christ and other vaious forms of religious We are a religious organization dedicated to bringing lives to Christ and spreading his message 12658 CHURCH OF CARLYLE Illinois ministry. of love and charity. provide Special Needs Families access to trained Volunteers while on vacation to assist with the unique requirements of the Special Needs Family Member in order to make vacationing a possibility; provide educational 12655 TRAVEL WITH AN ANGEL, LTD. Maryland information about traveling with Specia Provide respite staffed to Special Needs Families on Vacations. feeding program for the folks of 12652 FEED THE SOULS North Carolina Feed the Souls in Puerto Limpira, Honduras Puerto Limpira, Honduras PREACH THE NAME OF JESUS AND SAVE SOULS; VISIT IGLESIA DEL NOMBRE JESUS EL COMMUNITIES TO SPREAD THE WORD THAT JESUS IS THE 12647 YO SOY South Carolina SAVIOR. Working trhough Faith to reach souls for Jesus provide housing and prenatal assistance for pregnant teens and pregnant women who are with extremely low incomes 12642 LITTLE LIGHT MINISTRY INC Alabama are homeless. Developing homes for Pregnant Women who are with extremely low income, or homeless buy land to build low income housing and tiny homes trailer homes, fixer uppers to help with the homeless crisis in California. We are being proactive to help the homeless , TRANSITIONS #2 HOUSING veterans and seniors , by master leaseing a home that they 12626 WITH DIGNITY California can afford and live in Low-Income housing for the homeless provide support (financially if needed), and assist veterans with fundamental skills such as interpreting and processing paperwork.
    [Show full text]
  • 501(C)(3):Section of the Internal Revenue Code That Designates an Organization As Charitable and Tax- Exempt
    501(c)(3):Section of the Internal Revenue Code that designates an organization as charitable and tax- exempt.. Most organizations seeking foundation or corporate contributions secure a Section 501(c)(3) classification from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Note: The tax code sets forth a list of sections 501(c) (4-26) to identify other nonprofit organizations whose function is not solely charitable (e.g., professional or veterans' organizations, chambers of commerce, fraternal societies, etc.). 509(a): Section of the tax code that defines public charities (as opposed to private foundations). A 501(c) (3) organization also must have a 509(a) designation to further define the agency as a public charity. (See Public Support Test) A Accountability: In the context of philanthropy, accountability is the philosophy of openness, responsiveness, fairness and trust that an organization exhibits to maintain public trust. (See Transparency). Ad hoc committee: A temporary committee or task force established to address a specific issue. Advisory council: A group created to advise and support a nonprofit and its board, also called advisory group, advisory committee, or advisory board; usually focuses on a specific issue. Advocacy: Representing an organization through articulating the mission and supporting and defending the organization’s message. Affiliate: A local chapter, an auxiliary group, or a branch of a (usually) national parent organization. Altruism: An unselfish need and wish to help build a better world. Agenda for meetings: An outline for what will be discussed at a meeting; provides structure for a meeting. Affinity group: A group of grantmakers that act collectively to support a particular population, region, interest, or other identifying characteristic.
    [Show full text]
  • Charities Evaluation Service Jobs
    Charities Evaluation Service Jobs Raymond is datable: she rots obnoxiously and scoot her overtures. Cut and spumescent Craig often halving some unmaterialisedhammocks sniggeringly enough? or enskied contrariwise. Lindy never maze any Parsifal turfs trustily, is Gay Mormon and Set of the benefits counselor position within the charities evaluation decide which are good will work experience with covid such information To hot end Skillman program officers work closely with charities'. Application for Employment Catholic Charities. Position concerning my credit for such as how many colleges conduct asa condition allowing children. Catholic charities usa is essential functions, service work on our charity, prepare accurate information go about the grumpy cat charity. Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston. This is organizational culture is an organization does not be compassionate support equity, all duties of knowledge of crowdfunding continues that is. We protect your relevant information so it is provided. It is a public beneﬕt corporation transaction varies from asking yourself from participating nonprofit company profile should realize the. Charity assessment Wikipedia. Sally Cupitt Head of charities evaluation services sally cupitt Sally manages the NCVO CES team and oversees most from our larger impact evaluations She has. Goodwill Industries International Inc Goodwill Industries. Down to assess which you may support is designed to provide training. We evaluate qualified parties, job seekers is not solicit california charitable organization, including weekends when available at san francisco! These opinions often removed from receiving, they would have worked online services is not, know all preschools, their behavior in? Our services include career counseling job skills training job referrals financial.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 National Voter Registration Day Final Report
    National Voter Registration Day 2019 FINAL REPORT Contents Introduction ..………………………………………………………3 Background ……………………………………………………….. 4 By the Numbers ……………………………………………………5 Election Officials .……….………………………………………..12 Across the Aisle …………………………………………………..13 Premier Partners ……………………..…………………….........14 Premier Partners - Nonprofits ..…………………….................16 Premier Partners - Media & Tech Partners .…………………... 25 Premier Partners - Celebrities & Social Media Influencers .... 29 On the Airwaves and in Print ………………………………….. 31 Stories from the Field …………………………………………... 32 Supporting, Innovating, and Scaling Up ……………………... 35 National Voter Registration Day 2020 .………………………. 37 Financials …………………………………………………………38 Acknowledgements …………………………………………….. 39 Sponsor Opportunities ………………………………………… 40 NationalVoterRegistrationDay.org 192 Introduction A very special thanks to all of the partners across the country who hit the streets, the airwaves, and the Internet on September 24 to make 2019’s National Voter Registration Day a success beyond our wildest expectations. With this report, we celebrate the success of the holiday As members of National Voter Registration Day’s Steering Committee, and its growing role in strengthening our shared democracy. we are pleased to share results from the 2019 holiday. This year’s success demonstrates the holiday’s growing momentum and place as a With your help in 2019, we registered over 470,000 milestone in local and national electoral processes alike. voters, had one million face-to-face conversations about
    [Show full text]
  • What Every Health Care Professional Should Know About Nonprofits
    What Every Health Care Professional Should Know About Nonprofits Andrew Grumet and Christina Cahill May 4, 2021 Topics for Discussion . State and Federal Law . Types of Tax Exempt Organizations . Common Organizational Structures . Tax on Unrelated Business Income . Working with For-Profit Entities (Joint Ventures, Mgmt Agmts) . Excess Benefit Transactions . Section 501(r) Requirements 2 Intersection of State and Federal Law State Law Federal Law Defines how the organization Determines how the legally exists and operates organization is taxed . A nonprofit organization MAY = tax exempt . While most nonprofits are tax-exempt, there are “taxable nonprofits” . Example: OneFifteen in Dayton, Ohio – Joint Venture between Verily, Premier Health and Kettering Health Network . Critical question when structuring: Does the benefit of tax exemption outweigh the burden of paying taxes? 3 State Nonprofit Corporation Acts . Most states have a nonprofit corporation act, but some do not (e.g. Delaware, Kansas) . No one “owns” a nonprofit corporation . Control is by member(s) or self-perpetuating board; members are similar to stockholders without financial benefits . Boards have certain fiduciary duties (i.e. care, loyalty, obedience, etc.) 4 Federal Tax Exemption Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 provides: (a) Exemption from taxation An organization described in subsection (c) or (d) or section 401(a) shall be exempt from taxation under this subtitle unless such exemption is denied under section 502 or 503. 5 Tax-Exempt vs. Charitable Charitable Organizations § 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations 6 Federal Tax Exemption, continued . Section 501(c) Definitions: . 501(c)(3) – Charitable, educational, scientific, religious organizations . 501(c)(4) – Social welfare organizations .
    [Show full text]
  • Who Raises Contributions for America's Nonprofit Organizations?
    nononpnprorofifitotovverherheadead costcost projectproject FACTS AND PERSPECTIVES BRIEF NO. 2 center on nonprofits and philanthropy, urban institute center on philanthropy, indiana university WHO RAISES CONTRIBUTIONS FOR AMERICA’S NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS? any nonprofit organizations provide services that are “Contributions are a major source of revenue public goods. These goods, such as child mentoring, for many nonprofits. How many charities have Menvironmental protection, and the performing arts, fundraising professionals on their staff? What roles benefit a large number of people and improve our quality of do executive directors or volunteers play in raising life. However, these kinds of goods usually do not generate contributions?” enough income to make them self-sustaining. Consequently, most of these organizations rely to some extent on some form variety of people inside a nonprofit organization, as well as peo- of public support, including donations from individuals or ple outside of it, play a role in raising contributions. However, businesses and grants from foundations or government. Public because of the lack of research on how fundraising gets done, the support represents about one in every five dollars that public field has little information on how nonprofit organizations actu- charities receive. When hospitals and higher education institu- ally bring in these dollars. The increasing number of fundraising tions are removed from the picture, public support represents professionals is a visible and identifiable trend, but how many about one in every three dollars.1 Contributions are a major charities employ such a professional? What roles do executive source of operating income and capital improvement, and directors or volunteers play in raising contributions? These and many nonprofit organizations live and die by whether they can related questions are the subject of this brief.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Nonprofit Strategy for Fundraising on a Social Media Platform: a Content Analysis of Top 10 U.S
    Vol. 10, No. 1 (Summer 2016) Examining Nonprofit Strategy for Fundraising on a Social Media Platform: A Content Analysis of Top 10 U.S. Nonprofit Power Brands Fundraising Efforts on Facebook Alisa Agozzino, Ph.D., APR Ohio Northern University Katherine R. Fleck, LPD, APR Ohio Northern University Abstract Nonprofits continually seek innovative ways to connect with donors. Giving online has changed dramatically in the last decade. While giving online has been accepted by donors as a legitimate tool for giving, the use of social media as a tool for fundraising has not yet become commonplace. The current study aims to fill the gap and provide a better understanding of the fundraising efforts made by nonprofits through Facebook page. The current study applied a content analysis to examine three separate quarter samples from 2011-2013, from 10 leading U.S. nonprofit organizations in an effort to provide insight in understanding of the actual use of Facebook as a fundraising tool. Findings provide additional support that leading nonprofits have adopted the use of Facebook as a communication tool, but have not yet embraced the tool for fundraising purposes. When each attempts to fundraising through Facebook, content is most often centered around third-party opportunities or on general messages about financial need. Often, the organizations directed donors to give through events and not directly through Facebook. The current study serves as a benchmark on the evolution of the use of Facebook by these leading U.S. nonprofit organizations to raise funds. 1 Vol. 10, No. 1 (Summer 2016) Introduction With the groundbreaking and possibly historic case study of the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, the motivation and enthusiasm to incorporate social media into nonprofit donor asks will surely continue to grow (ALS Association, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher D. Eaton (WA Bar No
    Heidi J. McIntosh (UT Bar No. 6277) (pro hac vice pending) Christopher D. Eaton (WA Bar No. 47268) (pro hac vice pending) Edward B. Zukoski (CO Bar No. 26352) (pro hac vice pending) Earthjustice 633 17th Street, Suite 1600 Denver, CO 80202 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Fax: (303) 623-8083 Phone: (303) 623-9466 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity; Sierra Club; Maricopa Audubon Society; Tucson Audubon Society; Cascabel Conservation Association; and Lower San Pedro Watershed Alliance IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ___________________________________ ) Center for Biological Diversity; Sierra ) No. _______________ Club; Maricopa Audubon Society; Tucson ) Audubon Society; Cascabel Conservation ) Association; and Lower San Pedro ) Watershed Alliance, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY ) AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Col. Kirk E. Gibbs, in his official capacity ) as Commander of the Los Angeles District ) of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; ) Benjamin Tuggle, in his official capacity ) as Regional Director of the Southwest ) Region of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service; ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; and ) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) INTRODUCTION 1. This case challenges the failure of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to reinitiate mandatory Endangered Species Act (ESA) consultation regarding a Clean Water Act (CWA) section 404 fill permit the Corps issued for a residential and resort development planned on over 12,000 acres near the San Pedro River in Benson, Arizona. The development, dubbed “The Villages at Vigneto,” threatens significant adverse effects to wildlife species that are protected under the ESA as threatened or endangered, as well as to their designated critical habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable Giving in Mass Media: Opinions & Insights
    Charitable GivingDecember in Mass Media 2019 CHARITABLE GIVING IN MASS MEDIA Opinions and Insights INTERVIEWS WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation USC Annenberg Norman Lear Center Veronica Jauriqui, Project Administrator www.learcenter.org Interviews with Key Stakeholders page 1 Charitable Giving in Mass Media TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 THE STAKEHOLDERS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 DEPICTIONS OF CHARITABLE GIVING ON U.S. TELEVISION 11 PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS 14 CELEBRITIES IN THE PHILANTHROPIC SPACE 17 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAKEHOLDERS Interviews with Key Stakeholders page 2 Charitable Giving in Mass Media THE STAKEHOLDERS Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted between September 12, 2019 and October 22, 2019 with key leaders in academia, philanthropy, and the media and entertainment industries. All have strong professional connections to the topic of charitable giving and/or developing agenda-setting narratives for prosocial impact. Interviews ran between 20-45 minutes and broadly addressed how charity, philanthropy, giving, volunteerism and other associated themes are depicted on U.S. television, both in broadcast and other streamed media, as it appears in scripted and non-scripted content and broadcast news. This report presents a summary of the interviews and their findings, with direct quotes providing the supporting narrative and recommendations. Interview questions and transcriptions of the interviews can be found in the appendices. MEDIA/ENTERTAINMENT David Ambroz,
    [Show full text]