Bodacc Bulletin Officiel Des Annonces Civiles Et Commerciales Annexé Au Journal Officiel De La République Française
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Atlas Hydrogéologique Numérique De L'oise
Atlas hydrogéologique numérique de l’Oise Phase 2 : Notice Rapport d’avancement BRGM/RP-59757-FR Juin 2011 Atlas hydrogéologique numérique de l’Oise Phase 2 : Notice Rapport d’avancement BRGM/RP-59757-FR Juin 2011 Étude réalisée dans le cadre des projets de Service public du BRGM 2011 10EAUI56 V. Bault et R. Follet Vérificateur : Approbateur : Nom : J.J. Seguin Nom : D. Maton Date: 11/07/2011 Date : 12/07/2011 Signature : Signature : En l’absence de signature, notamment pour les rapports diffusés en version numérique, l’original signé est disponible aux Archives du BRGM. Le système de management de la qualité du BRGM est certifié AFAQ ISO 9001:2008. Mots clés : atlas, hydrogéologie, hydrologie, eau souterraine, eau superficielle, nappe, aquifère, bilan hydrologique, paramètres hydrodynamiques, données climatiques, piézométrie, SIG, Oise, Picardie. En bibliographie, ce rapport sera cité de la façon suivante : Bault V. et Follet R. (2011) – Atlas hydrogéologique numérique de l’Oise. Phase 2 : Notice. Rapport d’avancement. BRGM/RP-59757-FR, 168 p., 22 ill., 11 tab. © BRGM, 2011, ce document ne peut être reproduit en totalité ou en partie sans l’autorisation expresse du BRGM. Atlas hydrogéologique numérique de l’Oise. Phase 2 : Notice. Synthèse Constatant que le support et le contenu de l’atlas hydrogéologique du département de l’Oise, publié en 1987, ne répondaient plus aux besoins actuels d’informations et de consultation de ces données, le BRGM a proposé au Conseil Général de l’Oise et aux Agences de l’eau Seine-Normandie et Artois-Picardie de réaliser un atlas hydrogéologique départemental numérique pour le département de l’Oise. -
Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties -
Grape Varieties for Indiana
Commercial • HO-221-W Grape Varieties for Indiana COMMERCIAL HORTICULTURE • DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE PURDUE UNIVERSITY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE • WEST LAFAYETTE, IN Bruce Bordelon Selection of the proper variety is a major factor for fungal diseases than that of Concord (Table 1). Catawba successful grape production in Indiana. Properly match- also experiences foliar injury where ozone pollution ing the variety to the climate of the vineyard site is occurs. This grape is used primarily in white or pink necessary for consistent production of high quality dessert wines, but it is also used for juice production and grapes. Grape varieties fall into one of three groups: fresh market sales. This grape was widely grown in the American, French-American hybrids, and European. Cincinnati area during the mid-1800’s. Within each group are types suited for juice and wine or for fresh consumption. American and French-American Niagara is a floral, strongly labrusca flavored white grape hybrid varieties are suitable for production in Indiana. used for juice, wine, and fresh consumption. It ranks The European, or vinifera varieties, generally lack the below Concord in cold hardiness and ripens somewhat necessary cold hardiness to be successfully grown in earlier. On favorable sites, yields can equal or surpass Indiana except on the very best sites. those of Concord. Acidity is lower than for most other American varieties. The first section of this publication discusses American, French-American hybrids, and European varieties of wine Other American Varieties grapes. The second section discusses seeded and seedless table grape varieties. Included are tables on the best adapted varieties for Indiana and their relative Delaware is an early-ripening red variety with small berries, small clusters, and a mild American flavor. -
Dossier Départemental Sur Les Risques Majeurs De L'oise (D.D.R.M.)
PREFECTURE DE L'OISE Dossier Départemental sur les Risques Majeurs de l'Oise (D.D.R.M.) SERVICE INTERMINISTERIEL DE DEFENSE ET DE PROTECTION CIVILES Octobre 2012 1 2 SOMMAIRE A/ INTRODUCTION - Préambule..........................................................................................................................p.6 - Arrêté préfectoral portant approbation du Dossier Départemental sur les risques Majeurs de l'Oise.............................................................................................................................. p.7 - Tableau de mise à jour...................................................................................................... p.9 B/ LA PRISE EN COMPTE DU RISQUE MAJEUR B.1 - Le risque majeur – Généralités.................................................................................. p. 12 B.2 - La prévention des risques majeurs en France et dans le département........................p. 15 B.3 - La Protection Civile en France.................................................................................. p. 35 B.4 - Le Plan ORSEC : principes et fonctionnement..........................................................p. 40 B.5 - Les consignes individuels de sécurité........................................................................p. 46 B.6 - L’indemnisation........................................................................................................ p. 49 C/ LES RISQUES NATURELS DANS L’OISE C.1 - Le risque inondation.................................................................................................. -
RAPD Assessment of California Phylloxera Diversity. Molecular Ecology 4:459464.)
California grape phylloxera more variable than expected Jeffrey Granett 0 Andrew Walker P John De Benedictis GenineFong o Hong Lin P Ed Weber Many strains of grape phylloxera phylloxera’s biology, its life cycle and now have been identified in Cali- how grape species and rootstocks re- fornia vineyards. This variability sist its feeding. may be the result of multiple intro- This paper reviews our recent dis- ductions of this pest or of evolu- coveries that the DNA and feeding f tion of new strains on susceptible behavior of different collections of -G* or weakly resistant rootstocks. California phylloxera are relatively di- 8 1 verse. The discovery of diversity in 0 Thus own-rooted vines, weakly re- -J sistant rootstocks and those with biological populations is not novel, but the amount we found in California Grape phylloxera on rootstock. The minute V. vinifera parentage should not aphidlike insects feed on the root, causing a was unexpected. Because phylloxera be used in phylloxerated areas. In gall to form. The expanding and cracking gall were supposedly introduced into Cali- limits the root’s ability to take up water and addition, because of the observed fornia a relatively short time ago, and nutrients and allows rot organisms to invade. variability, quarantines are inef- they only reproduce asexually on the fective in preventing the occur- roots, we expected a relatively low are rarely damaged by its feeding. rence of biotype B phylloxera, as level of diversity. Other Vitis species, from parts of the it appears to evolve independently The variability in phylloxera’s abil- world where phylloxera are not na- in different areas. -
Phylloxera Strategiesis for Management in Oregon's Vineyards Information
EC 1463 • November 1995 $2.50 DATE. OF OUTPhylloxera StrategiesIS for management in Oregon's vineyards information: PUBLICATIONcurrent most THIS For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERVICE Contents Chapter 1. Phylloxera: What is it? 1 Chapter 2. Reducing the risk of phylloxera infestation 3 Chapter 3. Sampling vines to confirm the presence of phylloxera 4 Chapter 4. How to monitor the rate of spread of phylloxera in your vineyard 5 Chapter 5. Managing a phylloxera-infested vineyard DATE. 7 Chapter 6. Replanting options for establishing phylloxera-resistant vineyards 9 Chapter 7. Phylloxera-resistant rootstocks for grapevines 12 Chapter 8. Buying winegrape plants OF 19 Chapter 9. Tips for producing phylloxera-resistant grafted vines 20 OUT IS Authors This publication was prepared by a phylloxera task force at Oregon State University. Members are Bemadine Strik, Extensioninformation: berry crops specialist; M. Carmo Candolfi-Vasconcelos, Extension viticulture specialist; Glenn Fisher, Extension entomologist; Edward Hellman, Extension agent, North Willamette Research and Extension Center; Barney Watson, Extension enologist: Steven Price, postdoctoral research associate, viticulture; Anne Connelly, master's program student, horticulture; and Paula Stonerod, research aide, horticulture.PUBLICATION current most THIS For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog Chapter 1 Phylloxera: What is It? B. Strik, A. Connelly, and G. Fisher History green, or light brown; on weakened distances. In Oregon, above-ground roots they are brown or orange. Mature nymphs have been detected on trunk The grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira adults become brown or purplish- wraps in July and August. vitifoliae (Fitch), is an aphidlike insect brown, no matter on what kind of root that feeds on grape roots. -
The Influence of Phosphorus Availability, Scion, and Rootstock on Grapevine Shoot Growth, Leaf Area, and Petiole Phosphorus Concentration R
The Influence of Phosphorus Availability, Scion, and Rootstock on Grapevine Shoot Growth, Leaf Area, and Petiole Phosphorus Concentration R. STANLEY GRANT ~* and M. A. MATTHEWS 2 Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) and Chenin blanc (Cb) scions on Freedom, AxR#1, St. George, and 110R rootstocks were grown under conditions of sufficient (+P) and deficient (-P) soil phosphorous availability. Shoot length, shoot dry weight, leaf area, and petiole P concentration were lower for -P compared to +P vines. Cb vines had larger leaves and more leaf area than CS vines and the leaf area of Cb vines was less inhibited by exposure to -P than was CS vines. Vines on Freedom had longer shoots, greater shoot biomass, and greater leaf area than vines on other rootstocks regardless of P availability. Under +P vines on St. George produced less shoot dry weight than vines on Freedom, but more than vines on 110R. However, the shoot dry weight and leaf area of vines on St. George was greatly inhibited by -P and vines on St. George appeared to not use P efficiently for growth under these conditions. Vines on 110R produced the least amount of shoot growth and leaf area among the rootstocks under +P, but were also the least inhibited by -P conditions. The shoot dry weight and leaf area of vines on AxR#1 was intermediate between vines on Freedom and vines on St. George and 110R, and were inhibited by -P slightly less than St. George. Freedom and 110R are more suitable for low P soils than St. George and AxR#1. -
Les Jours De Collecte Comment Obtenir Un
LES ORDURES MÉ NAGÈRES DÉCHETS CONCERNÉS COMMENT OBTENIR UN BAC OU EN CHANGER ? • Je contacte le Pôle Environnement. VAISSELLE ARTICLES D’HYGIÈNE verre brisé, couches, cotons-tiges, • Gratuitement, un bac est mis à ma disposition. vaisselle jetable mouchoirs usagés Sa taille dépend de celle de mon foyer. • J’assure son entretien au quotidien. • Si je quitte mon logement je le laisse sur place et j’informe le Pôle Environnement de mon départ. LES JOURS DE COLLECTE MARDI RESTES ALIMENTAIRES Royaucourt restes de poissons Welles Pérennes Domfront Le Frestoy et de viandes Dompierre Vaux Ferrières Sains Le Ployron Morainvillers Godenvillers Gannes Crèvecœur Courcelles le-Petit Épayelles Tricot Brunvillers la-Motte Coivrel Méry Quinquempoix Maignelay la-Batalle Wavignies Montigny DÉCHETS NON ACCEPTÉS Montgérain Plainval Catillon Saint-Martin Déchets recyclables / encombrants / déchets dangereux Fumechon Saint-Just aux-Bois Ménévillers en-Chaussée Ravenel VENDREDI Si mon bac contient ce type de déchets, il peut ne pas être collecté. Le Plessier Wacquemoulin Nourard sur-Saint-Just Montiers le-Franc Léglantiers Le Plessier Angivillers sur-Bulles Valescourt Moyenneville Le Mesnil sur-Bulles La Neuville Essuiles Roy Saint-Rimault Saint-Rémy Lieuvillers en-l'Eau Pronleroy Fournival Grandvillers LES RÈGLES DE LA COLLECTE Bulles Erquinvillers aux-Bois Rouvillers Cressonsacq Avrechy Cuignières Noroy Cernoy • J’utilise uniquement un bac* du Plateau Picard. *dans certains cas, des sacs Plateau Picard seront fournis à la place du bac Airion MERCREDI • J’y dépose mes déchets dans des sacs fermés. LUNDI JEUDI • Je sors mon bac la veille au soir de la collecte et je le rentre le lendemain. PAS DE COLLECTE LES : 1er janvier 1er mai 25 décembre Les déchets supplémentaires mis à côté de mon bac ne seront pas collectés. -
Population Diversity of Grape Phylloxera in California and Evidence for Sexual Reproduction
Population Diversity of Grape Phylloxera in California and Evidence for Sexual Reproduction Summaira Riaz,1,2 Karl T. Lund,1,2 Jeffrey Granett,1 and M. Andrew Walker1* Abstract: Until recently, the foliar forms of grape phylloxera have been absent or very rare in California, and no- dosities have not been common on resistant rootstocks. Foliar phylloxera are now widely spread in the mothervine plantings of grape rootstock nurseries in Yolo and Solano counties. Nodosities on resistant rootstocks have also been frequently observed. To determine the genetic relationships within and among these seemingly new types of phyl- loxera, collections were made across California from 2009 to 2011. Foliar-feeding phylloxera strains were collected from rootstock mothervines at the National Clonal Germplasm Repository in Winters, CA; University of California, Davis (UCD), vineyards; and six commercial rootstock nursery plantings in Yolo and Solano counties. Root-feeding samples were collected from a rootstock trial at the UCD Oakville research station vineyard in Napa County, which had previously been sampled in 2006 and 2007. Root-feeding samples were also collected from commercial vineyards in Napa and Sonoma counties and UCD vineyards. All samples were tested and genotyped using simple sequence repeat markers, and the genetic structure of the populations was analyzed. The results identified four genetically distinct populations of phylloxera in California, which were named Davis, Foliar, Napa1, and Napa2. Davis, Napa1, and Napa2 were composed of root-feeding samples. Multilocus genotypes with identical DNA-fingerprint profiles were detected in the 2006 to 2007 samples from the Oakville research station. More genetic divergence was observed in the Davis, Napa1, and Napa2 populations, with evidence for sexual reproduction between members of Napa1 and Napa2. -
Best Practice Management Guide: Eutypa Dieback Spores
Wine Australia for Australian Wine Best practice management guide Version 1.1 • Feb 2018 Eutypa dieback Introduction 5 key facts Eutypa dieback, caused by the fungus Eutypa lata, is a major trunk disease of grapevines. The productivity • Caused by a fungus that is spread by airborne spores of infected grapevines gradually declines and vines • Spores are released from infected dead wood eventually die. Eutypa dieback costs the Australian during rainfall wine industry millions of dollars in lost production and • Spores infect exposed pruning wounds and the additional vineyard costs per annum. Vineyard owners fungus progressively kills spurs, cordons and trunks can manage the disease by physically removing • Wounds are most susceptible to infection in the first infected wood and encouraging shoots from lower, 2 weeks after pruning uninfected parts of the vine. Wound treatments should • Disease control can be achieved with preventative be applied post-pruning to reduce likelihood of new wound treatments and curative remedial surgery infections. Spores Rain Wind Spores Fresh pruning wound Old, diseased vine Young, healthy vine Symptomatic vine Figure 1. Eutypa dieback disease cycle. 2 Wine Australia Best practice management guide: Eutypa dieback Spores Spores Large wounds Cane-pruned vine closer to trunk. Spores Small wounds further from trunk. Spores Spur-pruned vine Figure 2. Spur- and cane-pruned vines, showing wound size and proximity to trunk, which impact the progression of eutypa dieback. Disease cycle The E. lata fungus grows, on average, at 2 cm/year Eutypa dieback is spread when fungal spores land on an through the vascular tissue of the cordons towards the open wound (e.g. -
Anthocyanin Profile and Antioxidant Activity from 24 Grape Varieties Cultivated in Two Portuguese Wine Regions
08-jordao_05b-tomazic 01/04/14 20:26 Page51 ANTHOCYANIN PROFILE AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY FROM 24 GRAPE VARIETIES CULTIVATED IN TWO PORTUGUESE WINE REGIONS Elisa CoSTA 1, Fernanda CoSME 2, António M. JorDÃo 1* and Arlete MEnDES-FAIA 2 1: Polytechnic Institute of Viseu (Centre for the Study of Education, Technologies and Health), Agrarian Higher School, Estrada de nelas, Quinta da Alagoa, ranhados, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal 2: Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering – Centre of Genomics and Biotechnology (IBB-CGB-UTAD), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, School of Life Science and Environment, 5001-801 Vila real, Portugal Abstract Résumé Aims : The purpose of this work was to evaluate the general Objectifs : Le but de ce travail était d’évaluer la phenolic composition and the anthocyanin profile of composition phénolique générale et le profil d’anthocyanes 24 grape varieties from two Portuguese wine regions as well de 24 cépages de deux régions viticoles portugaises ainsi as their antioxidant activity in the different grape berry que leur activité antioxydante dans les différentes fractions fractions (skins, pulps and seeds). de baie de raisin (pellicules, pulpes et pépins). Methods and results : Individual anthocyanin composition Méthodes et résultats : Les anthocyanes obtenues à partir of grape skin extracts was analyzed by HPLC, whereas total d’extraits de pellicules de raisin ont été analysées par HPLC antioxidant activity was evaluated by two methods: DPPH tandis que l’activité antioxydante totale a été évaluée par and ABTS. In general, a high variability was found among deux méthodes : DPPH et ABTS. En général, une grande the different autochthonous and non-autochthonous grape variabilité a été observée parmi les différentes variétés de varieties in relation to the polyphenolic compounds raisins autochtones et non autochtones en ce qui concerne analyzed, especially the individual anthocyanins. -
Collège M & G Blin
À PARTIR DU 02/09/2019 TOUT PUBLIC CIRCULE UNIQUEMENT EN PÉRIODE SCOLAIRE Collège M & G Blin Maignelay-Montigny Simpliez vos déplacements oise-mobilite.fr 0 970 150 150 Collège M & G Blin TOUT PUBLIC CIRCULE UNIQUEMENT Maignelay-Montigny EN PÉRIODE SCOLAIRE u ALLER u Collège M & G Blin Course n° 31046 31045 31043 31049 31047 L m Me L m Me L m Me L m Me L m Me Période scolaire J V J V J V J V J V Particularités COMMUNE ARRÊT MONTIERS Centre 7:55 WACQUEMOULIN Place de la Mairie 7:58 MÉNÉVILLERS Centre 8:03 Mairie-École 8:09 SAINT MARTIN AUX BOIS vaumont 8:11 MONTGÉRAIN Centre 8:14 SAINT JUST EN CHAUSSÉE Collège 7:45 | BRUNVILLERS LA MOTTE Centre 7:55 | SAINS MORAINVILLERS Rue Henri Morel 8:00 | FERRIÈRES Rue Placide Navarré 8:07 | CRÈVECŒUR LE PETIT Mairie 8:10 | Moulin Grevin 7:40 | | LE PLOYRON Grande Rue 7:43 | | Vaux-Rue des 7:47 | | LE FRESTOY VAUX Marronniers Rue des lilas 7:50 | | TRICOT Grande Rue | | | 8:10 COURCELLES EPAYELLES Mairie 7:55 | | | MÉRY LA BATAILLE Centre 8:03 | | | TRICOT Mairie 8:07 | | 8:12 COIVREL École 8:15 | 8:17 | Centre | | | 8:00 | WELLES PÉRENNES Perennes | | | 8:03 | Abbémont | | | 8:05 | ROYAUCOURT Centre | | | 8:08 | DOMÉLIERS Scolaire Domelien | | | 8:10 | DOMFRONT Route de Royaucourt | | | 8:13 | DOMPIERRE Place | | | 8:15 | GODENVILLERS Mairie-École | | | 8:20 | MAIGNELAY-MONTIGNY Collège 8:25 8:20 8:25 8:30 8:17 t RETOUR t Collège M & G Blin Course n° 31055 31056 31050 31054 31053 31059 31058 31051 31052 31057 Période scolaire Me Me Me Me Me L m J V L m J V L m J V L m J V L m J V Particularités COMMUNE