DOCSLIB.ORG

Brighton and Hove City Plan Part 2 Scoping Consultation Section 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brighton and Hove City Plan Part 2 Scoping Consultation Section 10 Resp 101 Comment. Event Name City Plan Part Two - Scoping Paper Comment ID 1 Response Date 20/09/16 20:55 Status Submitted Submission Type Web Version 0.1 Which section do you want to make comments on? General comment Individual Name S Ancell Individual Address Individual Email Individual Tel TR3: If you consider a more detailed policy is the best option, what might be your preferred approach, for example: B10: Do you consider the following green spaces should be designated Local Green Spaces? Please indicate which topic or topics you would like to comment on? Please let us know if there are any other issues you would like us to consider for the City Plan Part Two? Before any more housing can be considered anywhere in this country, the infrastructure must be sorted out first, especially our NHS and after care. Too many mistakes are being made because everything is at dangerous breaking point. I know this from first hand experiences. If the university is allowed to expand, which is a good thing, then appropriate housing for all university students must also be built on campus for two main reasons. First, it will free up valuable affordable housing for families and smarten up badly delapitated areas. Then our valuable green belts can be saved. Secondly, housing students on campus will keep students safer. A proper village could be built with doctors, dentists and maybe a couple of shops. This makes a whole lot of sense for many reasons. Our valuable green belts must be preserved. We have a huge wealth of flora and fauna that depend on these areas. Once they're gone, they're gone forever. There will be no turning the clock back, and plenty of regrets if it is allowed! Powered by Objective Online 4.2 - page 1 Resp 102 Comment. Event Name City Plan Part Two - Scoping Paper Comment ID 1 Response Date 20/09/16 21:32 Status Submitted Submission Type Web Version 0.1 Which section do you want to make comments on? General comment Individual Name NCuddeford Individual Address Individual Email Individual Tel TR3: If you consider a more detailed policy is the best option, what might be your preferred approach, for example: B10: Do you consider the following green spaces should be designated Local Green Spaces? Please indicate which topic or topics you would like to comment on? Please let us know if there are any other issues you would like us to consider for the City Plan Part Two? My remarks relate purely to the village of Rottingdean for it is incumbent for all residents to safeguard and protect the village at all costs. 1.- The infrastructure of Rottingdean cannot tolerate more housing as envisaged for the St Aubyns Playing Field for any number of reasons, pollution being already a major concern for the health of the people living in the vicinity especially around the High Street area. 2.- Traffic on the Falmer Road, morning and late afternoon, is usually gridlocked; the thought of an additional hundred or so houses is farcical if only for that reason. 3.- Already there are insufficient school places in the immediate vicinity let alone having to support a substantial increase in the population. In short the area cannot support additional housing without suffering dire consequences in the long term. Our beautiful village of Rottingdean would be destroyed forever unless the villagers stand firm and stand together. There are, of course, any number of other valid reasons why the Powered by Objective Online 4.2 - page 1 envisaged project should not be permitted but the three highlighted above should be reason enough to convince the Powers that be that this is a non starter and could never succeed. Powered by Objective Online 4.2 - page 2 Resp 103 Resp 104 Comment. Event Name City Plan Part Two - Scoping Paper Comment ID 1 Response Date 21/09/16 09:02 Status Submitted Submission Type Web Version 0.1 Which section do you want to make comments on? Housing Design Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report General comment Individual Name P Usher Individual Address Individual Email Individual Tel H2: The 2014 and 2015 Urban Fringe Assessment studies have already looked at a range of considerations (open space, landscape, heritage, ecology and environmental considerations) in establishing whether there is housing potential on some of the city’s urban fringe sites. Are there other (i.e. different) assessment considerations that City Plan Part 2 should also consider to guide the allocation of urban fringe sites? Greater emphasis should be put on maintaining the same density of housing to that of the surrounding development. There should also be design considerations to ensure any development is similar to those already there ie. no flat roofed terrace housing in an area of single storey pitch roofed detached properties. There should be greater protection of fringe sites adjacent to the SDNP especially along the major access routes. So that the entry and exit is not spoiled by inappropriate development. B: Housing mix – dwelling types, sizes and tenures H4: Should proposed housing site allocations in City Plan Part 2 seek to specify a range of dwelling types and sizes or should this be left to a more general criteria-based type of planning policy? The dwelling types should be in keeping with the existing properties. H5: On urban fringe site allocations, should the City Plan Part 2 seek to secure a specific proportion of family sized housing given the city’s lack of suitable sites for family sized housing? Powered by Objective Online 4.2 - page 1 The size and type of housing should be in keeping with the existing housing. H6: Can you think of other ways in which City Plan Part Two could help to ensure that a good mix of housing gets delivered in the city? Greater emphasis should be put on developing urban brownfield sites before desecrating the countryside adjacent to the SDNP. C: Making full and effective use of sites H7: Should City Plan Part Two introduce additional policy to ensure that new development maximises site potential (subject to appropriate criteria) and avoids the under-development of housing sites? If so, what might be appropriate planning considerations to include in such a policy? No. The development should be in-keeping with the existing properties, otherwise mini ghettos are likely to be built. D: Housing for key groups in the city H8: Should City Plan Part 2 include development management policies which seek to address the accommodation needs of particular groups within the city’s communities? For example, policies to specifically address and support housing options for older people; for families and for people with specialist housing needs? Yes. It would be inappropriate to develop sites for general housing where there are steep inclines that make it impossible to be accessed by the disabled. Thus discriminating against the old and infirm and those who depend on public transport for all their needs. H16: Should City Plan Part 2 seek to introduce the higher optional technical standards for ‘access and adaptability’ in new housing and an appropriate proportion of wheelchair user dwellings? Yes it should. However the development itself must be accessible in the first place by those who use a wheelchair and depend on public transport Are there any other housing issues? H21: Can you think of any other policy issues that relate to new housing development (and are not already covered in the sections above) that you think City Plan Part Two should seek to address? That the development itself should be accessible for disabled people that depend on public transport ie. where there is a gradient too steep for a wheelchair user to access a bus stop. It access to the development is denied because of this, then the development actively discriminates against the old, infirm, disabled and the development will solely exist for the young and fit. TR3: If you consider a more detailed policy is the best option, what might be your preferred approach, for example: B10: Do you consider the following green spaces should be designated Local Green Spaces? D3: Are there other streetscape and/or new, emerging design issues apart from those identified above that should be included in a Detailed Place Making Policy? That any new development should reflect the character of the existing housing ie. no flat roofed terraced housing in an area of pitched roofed detached properties. D: Are there any other design issues? Powered by Objective Online 4.2 - page 2 D9: Can you think of any other policy issues that relate to the design of new development (not already covered in the sections above) that you think City Plan Part Two should seek to address? A new development should reflect the design of existing properties ie. if all around are brick built then the new development should have brick elements in them. Please indicate which topic or topics you would like 4. Air Quality and Transportation to comment on? 5. Climatic Factors and Flooding Context Review and Appendix A Q1a. Are there any other documents that should be Don't know / not sure referred to as part of the Context Review? Baseline Data, Indicators and Appendix B Q2a. Is there any other baseline data, which is readily Don't Know / not sure available, that would be useful for the baseline or for monitoring purposes? Sustainability Issues Q3a. Does the Sustainability Issues section Don't know / not sure adequately address the main issues? SA Framework (1) We would particularly value your feedback and input into the proposed Sustainability Appraisal Framework. The SA Objectives have been revised since the City Plan Part 1, and new “Decision Making Criteria” have been developed for both the policy appraisals and the site assessments to help guide assessments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heritage-Statement
    Document Information Cover Sheet ASITE DOCUMENT REFERENCE: WSP-EV-SW-RP-0088 DOCUMENT TITLE: Environmental Statement Chapter 6 ‘Cultural Heritage’: Final version submitted for planning REVISION: F01 PUBLISHED BY: Jessamy Funnell – WSP on behalf of PMT PUBLISHED DATE: 03/10/2011 OUTLINE DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS ON CONTENT: Uploaded by WSP on behalf of PMT. Environmental Statement Chapter 6 ‘Cultural Heritage’ ES Chapter: Final version, submitted to BHCC on 23rd September as part of the planning application. This document supersedes: PMT-EV-SW-RP-0001 Chapter 6 ES - Cultural Heritage WSP-EV-SW-RP-0073 ES Chapter 6: Cultural Heritage - Appendices Chapter 6 BSUH September 2011 6 Cultural Heritage 6.A INTRODUCTION 6.1 This chapter assesses the impact of the Proposed Development on heritage assets within the Site itself together with five Conservation Areas (CA) nearby to the Site. 6.2 The assessment presented in this chapter is based on the Proposed Development as described in Chapter 3 of this ES, and shown in Figures 3.10 to 3.17. 6.3 This chapter (and its associated figures and appendices) is not intended to be read as a standalone assessment and reference should be made to the Front End of this ES (Chapters 1 – 4), as well as Chapter 21 ‘Cumulative Effects’. 6.B LEGISLATION, POLICY AND GUIDANCE Legislative Framework 6.4 This section provides a summary of the main planning policies on which the assessment of the likely effects of the Proposed Development on cultural heritage has been made, paying particular attention to policies on design, conservation, landscape and the historic environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Elegant Eastbourne
    m WEDDING GOLD WATCH to fet. PRESENTS. BBACELETS. NEWEST AND BEST. Real Gold Self-fitting Bracelets i be repUed to to torOtog,. with Jewelled Lever Watches _s given. Personal appliea- 1 iOWEST p o s s i b l e p r i c e s i. tor particulars, are naelee*. FROM 6 0 /- EACH. or( SOLD, large HOUSE: GUARANTEED, fterrace, Hastings; quietly Its, Decorators, Slgnwriters, Wm. Brnford & Son I be altered as private house ■particulars apply, J. W.t 21, Goldsmiths and 8Uvermiths, Wm. Bruford &5on London, N. - _______ ASHIONABLE VISITOR A N D G U ID E [NESS FOR SALK (Ladies’* iMtboonw and KxeUr. he; old-established; capital Ifce, for fixtures and fittings, |^er.—Apply, Chas. Horne. t AND DISTRICT. - For EA8TB0TJRNE, SAT SEPTEMBER 1915 1 TO BE LET OB SOLD in T e l e p h o n e : 22s, E a s t b o t je h b . PRICE ONE PENNY roality, with exoellent rail- pton and Eastbourne, apply nd Estate Agents, Market- ■Jgj A8TB0URNB THE EASTBOURNE H E LADIES’ COLLEGE, pod) TO LET; moderate A r t i s t i c C o u r t D r e s s m a k e r . President f GRA88INGTON ROAD. EASTBOURNE. iple or two or three ladies; SCHOOL OF COY MARY H. COOP! T [; with or without attend- 11, V 1 T I M 1 T BC ' / ' j E QF DEVONSHIRE. A Day School for the Daughters of Gentlemeni te: close to church.—Lewis, Principals: Dpthorne, 8urrey.________ Subjects and EVENIN G GOWNS at Moderate Prices lead Matter l Latest Creations in PETE i AUTUMN IS COMING! MISS HITCHCOCK and MISS CRAKE home Common; low .
    [Show full text]
  • North Laine Cultural Quarter the Lanes
    T h e R i d e d o a R r e o u B a n M n e n e e e a d v v n i c i r P A a d d o R o a D o l d d A R r r g f i e d a G e t d n r i n o a o s l a d p H r S p R R h s t s d o n p P a e s n d e P o o c o o l a U l l f n c e r f i m w e t P i r h Booth n P h e c n T H l a i D a a c l R o t R w Museum l e d l o n S s S a t d C of Natural r R London Road r e e m o Shaftesbury ROUNDHILL B e P l a c e e a History a r R o t Stanley t a d a Station t o n r d e i d c u D t s Court m a e y S r O Dyke k o l C t l e P l i d R r R l l YMCA e i I S o e H e Road t n h a H r s d v t d n o a d d d e r t n r S e Park o D e n a n o h u e R r e c u o s The a l i n i s o s e St.
    [Show full text]
  • East Sussex Record Office Report of the County Archivist April 2008 to March 2009 Introduction
    eastsussex.gov.uk East Sussex Record Office Report of the County Archivist April 2008 to March 2009 Introduction The year was again dominated by efforts towards achieving The Keep, the new Historical Resource Centre, but the core work of the Record Office continued more busily than ever and there was much of which to be proud. In July 2008 we took in our ten-thousandth accession, something of a milestone in the office’s own history of almost 60 years. An application to the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) for £4.9million towards the costs of The Keep was submitted by the Record Office on behalf of the capital partners, East Sussex County Council, Brighton & Hove City Council and the University of Sussex, in September. This represented around 20% of the anticipated costs of the building, since the partners remain committed to find the remainder. In December we learned our fate: that we had been unsuccessful. Feedback from the HLF indicated that ours had been an exemplary application, and one which they would have liked to have supported but, in a year when the effect of diverting HLF money to the Olympics was being felt, it was thought necessary to give precedence to some very high-profile projects. We were, of course, disappointed, but determined not to be deterred, and the partners agreed to pursue ways forward within the existing funding. Because it would further hold up the project, adding to inflation costs, but give no guarantee of success, we decided not to re-apply to the HLF, and by the end of the financial year were beginning to look at options for a less expensive building.
    [Show full text]
  • Regencyreview
    Regency Review The Newsletter of the Regency Society Issue 8 www.regencysociety.org September 2003 Gehry Graces chosen for King Alfred he cityʼs policy & resources committee have announced their preferred developer for the new King Alfred sports centre, withT retail space and some 438 flats: Karis/ING with architects Frank Gehry and Piers Gough leading the team of consultants. This decision has been welcomed by those who find the exceptional design of their towers exciting and attractive (particularly when compared to our present inheritance of tower blocks) – but others dislike it intensely. The architects describe the towers as the Four Graces, while some have called them tin cans. The decision was based on financial reports to the council. The economic impact of the Karis/ING scheme was preferred to the Barratt-Brunswick/Wilkinson Eyre bid (who proposed lower buildings with 468 flats); and the councilʼs consultants considered that it “best promoted the image of the city, continuing business visitors coming to look at the buildings – will continue to be confidence and in turn attracting further investment”. vital as the scheme develops. The public open space on the decks The scheme will provide greatly improved sports facilities. beneath the towers will be specifically designed to attract visitors, The present run-down, under-used facilities require a huge as will the public viewing gallery on the 18th floor of one tower. annual subsidy. It is forecast that, with the new sports centre, the We need to discover whether the sea can be seen between the subsidy per user will fall from nearly £2 to just under £1, with towers, when viewed from the streets to the north; and whether 75 per cent more users likely than at present.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Study of the Lewes District by GVA Grimley
    LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL RETAIL STUDY, MARCH 2005 FINAL DRAFT Reference: P:/Planning/643/Projects/02A500155 Contact: Chris Goddard / Duncan Mason Tel: (020) 7911 2202 / 0202 7911 2711 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] www.gvagrimley.co.uk +44 (0) 870 900 89 90 Signed For & On Behalf Of GVA GRIMLEY ……………………………… CHRIS GODDARD Date……………………………… LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL RETAIL STUDY, MARCH 2005 CONTENTS PAGE NO. Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1 2. Planning Policy Framework 3 3. The Development Plan 10 4. Retail and Leisure Trends 17 5. Sub-Regional Context 30 6. Retailing within the District of Lewes 42 7. Scope for Retail Development 49 8. Leisure Potential 60 9. Policy Recommendations 70 LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL RETAIL STUDY, MARCH 2005 PLANS Plan 1: Lewes District Council: Study Context Area Plan 2: Household Telephone Survey Plan 3: Comparison Goods Expenditure Leakage to Competing Centres Plan 4: Brighton Comparison Goods Market Share Plan 5: Eastbourne Comparison Goods Market Share Plan 6: Crawley Comparison Goods Market Share Plan 7: Haywards Heath Comparison Goods Market Share Plan 8: Uckfield Comparison Goods Market Share APPENDICES Appendix 1: Household Survey Questionnaire Appendix 2: Town Centre Boundaries Appendix 3: DTZ Rank Summary for Town Centre in the South East Appendix 4: Trading Influence of Competing Centres Appendix 5: Convenience Goods Capacity Appendix 6: Comparison Goods Capacity LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL RETAIL STUDY, MARCH 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Government guidance makes clear that sustainable development is the core principle underpinning planning. Accordingly PPS1 sets out a range of overarching policies aimed at facilitating sustainable patterns of urban and rural development through a number of initiatives, including the need to ensure that new developments provide good access to jobs and key services for all members of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Trades. Gam 861
    SUSSEX.] TRADES. GAM 861 Tully Thomll.8 David, 29a. &; 30 Rich- Gaze & Co. West Marina &; Balver- FURRIERS. mond buildings, Brighton hylihe road, St. Leonards Armfield Cha.rles, 7 St. James's st. Tumber T. 62 Edward st. Brighton Gillam Richard, 174 Westbourne st. Brighton Turner J. 7 St. Pancras, Chichester Hove, Brighton Atkins B. 22 Meeting Ho. la. Brighton Turner T. 62 North st. Chichester Goldr~g E. 15 South st. Eastbourne Baron .A.aron Woolf & Co. (wholesale), Urry J. Priory st. Southover, Lewes Hanningtons Limited, 10, 171 & 172 1a, Western road, Brighton Usher .A.rthUJ" .A.ugw:~tus,Orowborough North street & 2 & 3a,Pavilion build- Barrance & Ford, SI, sra & 5Ib,King's cross, Crowboro', Tunbridge Wells ingr, · Brighton; Davigdor road, Toad, Brighton & 3!, 32 & 33 Warton Chas. 48 Baker st. Brighton Hove & Lewes road, Brighlion Robertson st. Hastings. See B.livt Watts Geo. Hy. 49 North st.Chichestr Hill .John &. Sons, 2 Montague place, Chrimes Arthur, 2 Sussex gardens,. Welch Stephen (seoondhand),7o Nortth Kemp town, Brighton Terminus road, Eastbourne street, Portslade-by-Sea, Brighton Hilton George, South road, Hayward's Even den Henry, 28 & 30 Cornfield ter- Weller Har:ry Waiter, 27, 28 & 29 Heath race. Eastbourne. See advert Gloucester road, Brighton Hudson Willlan,; offices, Terminus Griffith Mrs. L. 10 Western st.Brightn Wenham John Thomas, 124 Pevensey gates, Brighton; The Arcade,Grove Harm an .A.. F. 10 Milward cres.Hastngs road, Eastbourne road, Eastbourne; Victoria station, Pallant George, 22 King's road & 27 & Western Furnishing Stores, 107 London SW & Paris; fireproof de- 28 Market .street, Brighton Blatchington road, Hove, Brighton positories, Brighton, Eastbourne & Riddlestorffer & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • OTCA Final Version with Cover.Pdf
    Contents: Statement of Special Interest i. Summary and significance ii. Key elements of character 1. Introduction Purpose History of designation Legislation and policy context Public consultation 2. Landscape setting Location and activities Geology and topography Setting 3. Historical development Overview Brighthelmstone Development of the resort Archaeology 4. Spatial analysis General character and plan form Open spaces and trees Views, focal points, focal buildings Property boundaries Public realm 5. The buildings of the Conservation Area Historical uses and positive building types Building styles, materials and colours Listed buildings Locally listed buildings Other buildings 6. Character areas The centre The Lanes The seafront North Street and West Street 2 7. Issues for future management Designation: - Conservation Area boundary review - Buildings Cumulative impact of minor alterations Vacant buildings and economic activity Unsympathetic development Opportunities Public realm Shop Fronts Traffic management 8. Commitment Adoption Review Appendix 1: Townscape Appraisal Map The Conservation Studio Brackendene House Carron Lane Midhurst West Sussex GU29 9LD [email protected] 01730 816710 Brighton & Hove City Council, City Development & Regeneration, Hove Town Hall, Norton Road, Hove BN3 3TR 01273 292222 www.brighton-hove.gov.uk 3 Statement of Special Interest i. Summary and Significance The Old Town area has formed the economic, social and civic core of Brighton throughout its transition from fishing settlement to city. It still provides evidence of this process that has resulted in a distinctive character and identity. The area has evolved as a focus for the development of Brighton as a tourism destination on the south coast, particularly during the period between the 17 th and early 20 th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Feb '15 Newsletter (Click Here)
    Brighton Area Buswatch Representing local bus users Part of Bus Users UK Buswatch News – February 2015 Coming soon – new low emission buses for Coaster route 12 In advance of the 24 new buses due shortly, this silver demonstration vehicle has been on loan from the manufacturer. Although visually similar to many existing buses this is in fact a new model. The Wrightbus ‘Streetdeck’ has a low emission Daimler Euro 6 engine and Brighton & Hove is the first bus operator to use this type in service. Production buses will be painted in a striking green based livery with Coaster branding and they may have a re-styled front. Sunday evening buses to Worthing please! We urge Stagecoach South to introduce a Sunday evening service on Coastliner route 700 this summer. At present the last bus from Brighton is 8pm on Sundays, yet there are buses as late as 3.30am on other nights. This does not make sense! The 700 is one of the busiest services in Brighton. All other frequent daytime services run on Sunday evenings and most are well used. Brighton & Hove’s Coaster service 12 to Eastbourne runs every 20 minutes and was increased last year following complaints about crowded buses. It is common to see passengers waiting in vain at the 700 stop in Churchill Square on Sunday evenings, especially in the summer months. Bus companies know that if people cannot get home in the evenings they are less likely to use buses during the daytime. So Stagecoach must be losing passengers, especially younger users who are more likely to travel in the evenings.
    [Show full text]
  • Mackie Avenue, 2, Ladies Mile Hotel, Patcham Historic Building No CA Public House ID 10 + 42 Not Included on Current Local List
    Mackie Avenue, 2, Ladies Mile Hotel, Patcham Historic Building No CA Public House ID 10 + 42 Not included on current local list Description: Following the decline of farming in the 1920s, much of the agricultural land in and around was sold off for development. This also coincided with the expansion of the Brighton boundary in 1928. The Ladies Mile Estate was developed in the 1930s by George Ferguson. The Ladies Mile Hotel was built as part of the estate in 1935, possibly to the designs of Friary, Holroyd and Healy. The estate also included the Clock Tower, Mackie Hall, Mackie Avenue Recreation Ground, the Plainfields open space and two Vale Avenue open spaces. These combined with the housing to form the estate, which was at the cutting edge of modern urban planning. In line with the ‘reform pubs’ of the age, the Ladies Mile provided ample space for a number of facilities, and thus formed the community focus for the estate. This marks the high point in purpose-built public house construction. Brick with hipped tile roofs. Symmetrical design. Main block with central gable housing a decorative medallion, and canted wings to either side. Curved one storey colonnade to frontage forms prominent feature. Art deco features such as an illuminated stained glass ceiling survive to the interior. Associated Mackie Hall in similar architectural style survives to south of main building. Free-standing original pub sign survives. The plan form, its relationship with the street and the associated pub sign give the impression of a modern interpretation of a country pub or country house.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society Newsletter Number 169 January 2016
    Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society - Newsletter Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society Newsletter Number 169 January 2016 Throwing the clay into the tile mould. Society visit to Aldershaw Hand Made Tiles Ltd. in Sedlescombe see the report in this Newsletter. (Malcolm Dawes) 1 Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society - Newsletter Newsletter 169 Contents January 2016 Editorial ......................................................................................................... 2 Forthcoming SIAS Events ............................................................................. 3 Events from Other Societies .......................................................................... 4 Society visit to Aldershaw Hand Made Tiles ................................................. 7 Coultershaw Trust News ................................................................................ 6 Pottery, Bricks and Tiles in and Around Burgess Hill - Talk ......................... 8 IA Notes for a Tour of Brighton ................................................................... 10 Guide to the Industrial Archaeology of Sussex ........................................... 20 A Mid-Nineteenth Century Corrugated Iron Building ................................. 20 Another challenging Mystery Image ........................................................... 21 Report on Recording and Endangered Sites ................................................ 21 Mystery Photo and Update .......................................................................... 22 Editorial
    [Show full text]
  • A) Involving Listed Buildings Or Within a Conservation Area
    BRIGHTON AND HOVE CITY COUNCIL WEEKLY LIST OF APPLICATIONS BRIGHTON AND HOVE CITY COUNCIL TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS & CONSERVATION AREAS) REGULATIONS 1990 TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING (GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE) ORDER 1995 PLEASE NOTE that the following planning applications were registered by the City Council during w/e 27/04/2007: (Notice under Article 8 and accompanied by an Environmental Statement where appropriate) a) Involving Listed Buildings or within a Conservation Area: BRUNSWICK AND ADELAIDE BH2007/00955 1st & 2nd Floor Flat 6 Farm Road Hove BRUNSWICK TOWN Proposed roof terrace on existing flat roof. Officer: Clare Simpson 292454 Applicant: Stuart Reed 1st & 2nd Floor Flat 6 Farm Rd Hove BN3 1FB BH2007/01166 Intergen House 65-67 Western Road Hove BRUNSWICK TOWN Replacement windows to rear and side elevations. Officer: Nicola Hurley 292114 Applicant: Fenton Estates Ltd Agent: Visual Creations Ltd Crown Hse Nth Circular Rd 103 Bridge House Three Mills Studios London NW10 TPN Three Mill Lane Bromley By Bow London E3 3DU BH2007/01301 Flat1 11 Adelaide Crescent Hove BRUNSWICK TOWN Removal of internal partition wall and reinstatement of blocked up rear window. Officer: Jonathan Puplett 292525 Applicant: Mr J Lawless Agent: The Graham-Watts Ptners F1 1 Adelaide Crescent Hove BN3 2JE Ridgeland Hse 165 Dyke Rd Hove BN3 1TL BH2007/01306 Flat 1 11 Adelaide Crescent Hove BRUNSWICK TOWN Reinstatement of blocked up rear window. Officer: Jonathan Puplett 292525 Applicant: Mr V Lawless Agent: The Graham-Watts Ptners Flat 1 1 Adelaide Crescent Hove Ridgeland Hse 165 Dyke Rd Hove BN3 1TL BH2007/01411 29 Palmeira Mansions Church Road Hove BRUNSWICK TOWN Change of use from offices to 4 flats including a new rear external fire escape and a cycle store.
    [Show full text]