PARLIAMENT WATCH An Evaluation of the Parliament of 2010

Written by Aiman Rasheed Research by Aishath Aima Musthafa © Transparency Maldives

This work is copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced without prior written permission from the publisher of this book.

Published by Transparency Maldives, Male’, Maldives Tel: +960 330 4017

Email: [email protected] http://www.transaprencymaldives.org

Written by Aiman Rasheed Research by Aishath Aima Musthafa Data verified and checked by Ahmed Shumrooj

Design and layout by Aminath Sofeenaz

Printed by Novelty Printers Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

This report is published by Transparency Maldives under the Parliament Watch Project funded by UNDP. Transparency Maldives is the national contact for Transparency International (TI) and is a non-partisan organization that promotes collaboration, awareness and other initiatives to improve governance and eliminate corruption from the daily lives of people. Transparency Maldives views corruption as a systematic issue and advocates for institutional change that will punish and prevent corruption.

Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information is believed to be correct as of March 2011. Nevertheless, Transparency Maldives cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use other than its intended purpose.

PARLIAMENT WATCH

Table of contents

1. Introduction...... 4 2. Parliament Watch...... 5 3. The Inter-Parliamentary Union...... 6 3.1 The IPU evaluation framework...... 6 4. The Parliament of Maldives...... 8 4.1 The 17th Parliament in numbers...... 8 4.1.1 The first session of the Parliament at a glance...... 10 4.1.2 The second session of the Parliament at a glance...... 11 4.1.3 The third session of the Parliament at a glance...... 12 5. Evaluation...... 14 5.1 Overall evaluation results...... 14 5.2 Representativeness of the Parliament...... 15 5.3 Effectiveness of Parliamentary oversight over the executive...... 16 5.4 Effectiveness of the legislative capacity of the Parliament...... 17 5.5 Transparency and accessibility of the Parliament...... 18 5.6 Accountability of the Parliament...... 19 5.7 Effectiveness of the Parliament’s involvement in foreign policy...... 20 6. Recommendations...... 22

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 3 PARLIAMENT WATCH

1) Introduction

Parliament Watch: An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives report is produced by Transparency Maldives under the Parliament Watch project funded by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The time frame under evaluation is the year 2010.

This report contains two main sections. The first section of the report summarizes key events including attendance of MPs, details of legislation submitted, rejected and passed in the three sessions of Parliament. The voting record of all MPs for all votes taken in the Parliament in the year 2010 is also included in the evaluation report.

The second section of the report is a survey based on the Inter Parliamentary Union’s (IPU) parliamentary assessment framework, developed in 2008. Institutions in many countries have utilized the IPU framework to evaluate the functions and processes of their respective parliaments. A total of 22 persons participated in the evaluation, including 15 Members of Parliament (MPs) and seven professionals in the media, civil society and legal sectors. Additional information contained in this report is derived from publications made public by the Parliament and information provided to Transparency Maldives upon request.

The aim of producing this report is to increase Parliamentary effectiveness, transparency and accountability and promote citizen participation in Parliamentary processes. This report will identify the strengths and weaknesses of the Parliament and provide an insight into the general functioning of the Parliament, its committees, transparency and accessibility mechanisms. Transparency Maldives hopes that this report is a valuable advocacy tool for the Parliament Secretariat, political parties, individual MPs, media and civil society to address the identified weaknesses and improve upon the strengths.

Transparency Maldives acknowledges the support and cooperation of MPs, journalists, NGO persons, lawyers and Parliament Secretariat in the evaluation of this report.

4 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

2) Parliament Watch

Transparency Maldives conducted the Parliament Watch project from March 2010 to March 2011 in partnership with local NGO Maldivian Democracy Network (MDN). Though the Parliament Watch project is jointly implemented, this report is produced solely by Transparency Maldives.

The aim of the Parliament Watch project is to make the Parliament accountable through increased and effective monitoring of the legislative processes and routine workings of the Parliament as well as to lobby for specific changes in bills relating to governance and human rights. Though advocacy to amend bills was a joint effort of both Transparency Maldives and MDN, Transparency Maldives focused mostly on governance related bills whereas MDN focused on bills relating to human rights.

Transparency Maldives advocated for changes to most of the 32 bills passed by Parliament in the year 2010, focusing extensively on Decentralization Act, Local Council Elections Act, Right to Information Bill, Political Party Bill and Maldives Broadcasting Corporation Act.

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 5 PARLIAMENT WATCH

3) The Inter-Parliamentary Union

The IPU is the international organization of Parliaments established in 1889. The IPU functions as the focal point for worldwide parliamentary dialogue and works for peace and cooperation among peoples and for the establishment of representative democracy. The IPU has 154 members and eight associate members, including the Maldives. IPU is based in Geneva, Switzerland.

The parliamentary self-assessment tool kit was produced by the IPU in 2008. The assessment kit is drawn mainly from the Democracy Assessment methodology of the International Institute of Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IIDEA). The purpose of the IPU framework is to assist Parliaments and other institutions in evaluating Parliaments against widely accepted criteria for democratic parliaments.

IPU works with UN bodies and regional and global institutions including governmental and non-governmental organizations. The IPU is primarily financed through its members from public funds.

3.1 The IPU evaluation framework

The IPU parliamentary assessment framework consists of a survey questionnaire focused on six main areas. Each of the six main areas or categories covers one aspect of a democratic parliament. The six main areas under the evaluation are:

1. The representativeness of the parliament; 2. Parliamentary oversight over the executive; 3. Parliament’s legislative capacity; 4. Transparency and accessibility of the parliament; 5. Accountability of the parliament; and 6. Parliament’s involvement in international policy.

Each of the 48 questionsrequires participants to make a subjective judgment on a rating scale from one to five, where one represents the minimum score and five represents the maximum. Transparency Maldives averaged the scores of the 22 participants for each of the six dimensions, and converted the scores to percentages for further simplification and better understanding.

The respondents consisted of 15 MPs, three journalists who cover the Parliament, Deputy Solicitor General, a former Attorney General and two members from civil society organizations. Of the 15 MPs, seven are from the main opposition Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party (DRP) and four from the ruling Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP). Two MPs from Jumhooree Party (JP) and one MP from People’s Alliance (PA) as well as an independent MP took part in the survey

6 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

1. Abdulla Mausoom MP, DRP, Kela Dhaaira 2. Ahmed Amir MP, Independent, Kudahuvadhoo Dhaaira 3. Ahmed Mahloof MP, DRP, South Galolhu Dhaaira 4. Ahmed Nihan Hussain Manik MP, DRP, Villimaafannu Dhaaira 5. Ali Azim MP, DRP, Mid-Henveiru Dhaaira 6. Eva Abdulla MP, MDP, North Galolhu Dhaaira 7. Gasim Ibrahim MP, JP, Maamigili Dhaaira 8. Hamdhoon Abdul Hameed MP, DRP, Inguraidhoo Dhaaira 9. Hamid Abdul Ghafoor MP, MDP, South Henveiru Dhaaira 10. Ibrahim Mutthalib MP, JP, Fares-Maathoda Dhaaira 11. Ilyas Labeeb MP, MDP, Hulhumeedhoo Dhaaira 12. Imthiyaz Fahmy MP, MDP, North Maafannu Dhaaira 13. Mohamed Mujuthaz MP, DRP, Hanimaadhoo Dhaaira 14. Visam Ali MP, DRP, Maduvvari Dhaaira 15. Yoosuf Abdul Ghafoor MP, PA, Gan Dhaaira 16. John-James Robinson Editor, www.minivannews.com 17. Ahmed Hamdhoon Journalist, Haveeru Daily and Haveeru Online 18. Aishath Shiura Reporter, MNBC One 19. Aishath Bisham Deputy Solicitor General, Attorney General’s Office 20. Azima Shukoor Former Attorney General and practicing lawyer 21. Mohamed Thoriq Hamid Project Coordinator, Transparency Maldives 22. NasheethThoha Project Coordinator, Maldivian Democracy Network

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 7 PARLIAMENT WATCH

4) The Parliament of Maldives

As per the Constitution of Maldives, the Maldivian Parliament is a unicameral legislature. Extensive powers are granted to the Parliament in Maldives’ presidential system of governance. Chapter three, Article 70 of the Constitution defines the role of the Parliament as:

• Amendment of the Constitution of Maldives according to the Constitution; • Enactment of legislation, amendment or repeal of laws; • Holding the executive to account; • Approval of the annual budget and supplementary budget; • Oversight of independent commissions and offices; • Holding public referendums on issues of public interest; and • Other duties specified in the Constitution of Maldives.

Tabulated below is the composition of the Parliament at the time of writing of this report. Since there are no laws or procedures prohibiting MPs from crossing the floor, the initial composition of the Parliament has changed since the 17th Parliament of Maldives was sworn in following the Parliamentary Elections in May 2009.

Party Affiliation Initial Current

Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party (DRP) 28 27

Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) 26 32

Independent 13 8

People’s Alliance (PA) 7 7

Dhivehi Qaumee Party (DQP) 2 1

Jumhooree Party (JP) 1 2

The opposition, is formed by an alliance between DRP and PA and holds the majority in the Parliament. The ruling MDP initially had 26 MPs, but now consists 32 due to cross overs of MPs from other parties as well as those MPs elected as independent candidates.

4.1) The 17th Parliament in numbers

The Parliament of Maldives convened in three sessions in the year 2010. A total of 52 bills were presented to the Parliament floor. Works on 42 bills were completed in the year 2010. Of the 42, the Parliament rejected four bills, their sponsors withdrew five bills, and one bill did not pass Parliamentary vote. 32 of the 42 bills were sent to the President for ratification following Parliamentary endorsement. In addition, five motions were presented to the Parliament out of which three were passed. An additional 27 issues presented to the Parliament were looked into. A total of 35 pieces of legislation remain at Parliamentary committees at the end of the Parliamentary year 2010, including legislations from the previous years. Of these 35 bills, individual MPs sponsored 24 bills and the government sponsored 11 bills.

8 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

Altogether, the 95 sittings of the Parliament added to 298 hours and two minutes, an average of three hours and eight minutes per sitting. Often times, committee meetings are conducted concurrently with Parliament sittings. This data does not include the time MPs spent in committee meetings. A total of 22 sittings of Parliament were disrupted at various stages, leading to termination of sittings. Hence a quarter (23%) of Parliamentary sittings were disrupted.

Tabulated below is a summary of the attendance records of MPs published by the Parliament. In addition Legislation Total no. of bills presented 52

Not accepted to Parliament 4

Withdrawn 5

Rejected at the final voting stage 1

Endorsed and sent for ratification 32

Legislation carried over to 2011 35

Sittings

Total number of sittings 95

Total number of time spent in sittings 298 hours 2 minutes

Average time spent in each sitting 3 hours 8 minutes

Total number of sittings disrupted 22

Percentage of sittings disrupted 23.16%

to four months of recess MPs get, MPs took casual leave and leave. In the first session of Parliament, 20 MPs took casual leave of 38 days, 13 MPs were on leave for a total of 58 days, two MPs were on an official trip for five days, 22 MPs were absent for 35 sittings of Parliament.

Only seven MPs attended all sittings of Parliament, while 23 MPs were absent for ten or more sittings of the 95 sittings of Parliament.

Casual Attended after leave Leave Official trip Absent conclusion of (Salam) sitting

1st Session No. of members 20 13 2 22 0

Total 38 58 5 35 0

2nd Session No. of members 27 8 3 42 11

Total 66 38 9 142 13

3rd Session No. of members 23 11 11 41 8

Total 43 34 24 127 9

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 9 PARLIAMENT WATCH

4.1.1) The first session of the Parliament at a glance

The first session of Parliament lasted from 1st March to 4th May 2010. The Parliament held 28 sittings that added up to 109 hours and 39 minutes. On average, the Parliament spent three hours and 55 minutes per sitting. A total of five sittings were disrupted and discontinued. An additional sitting was cancelled due to loss of quorum of the assembly. This is an average of 18% of the total sittings. Three of the sittings were cancelled over discussions of MNDF regulationsand two over alleged corruption of the Auditor General.

A total of 16 bills were submitted to Parliament. The government presented eight bills and individual MPs presented eight bills. Six pieces of legislation were passed by Parliament and sent to the President for ratification.

The highlights of the first session of Parliament include the removal of Maldives’ first Auditor General, provision of state subsidies to the media, passage of Maldives Broadcasting Corporation Act, Tax Administration Act, Decentralization Act and Local Council Elections Act. The Parliament voted to increase the session of Parliament by four days to conclude work on the Local Council Elections Act.

Legislation

Total no. of bills presented 16

Not accepted to Parliament 1

Withdrawn 1

Rejected at the final voting stage -

Endorsed and sent for ratification 6

Sittings

Time-frame 1st March – 4th May 2010

Total number of sittings 28

Total number of time spent in sittings 109 hours 39 minutes

Average time spent in each sitting 3 hours 55 minutes

Total number of sittings disrupted/cancelled 5

Percentage of sittings disrupted/cancelled 18%

The Auditor General was removed via a vote of no confidence on 29th March 2010. At the time of publishing of this report, an Auditor General has not been re-appointed. On 28th April, the Finance Committee of Parliament recommended to provide subsidies worth MVR 4 million to media organizations. 50% of the total amount of subsidies was handed out to VTV and DhiTV. Four radios received 35% while four daily newspapers received 15%.

The Decentralization Act and Local Council Elections Act paved way for the introduction of a

10 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

decentralized system of governance. The Maldives Broadcasting Corporation Act aimed to free the state TV and radio from political influence. Maldives Broadcasting Corporation (MBC) is currently at court to obtain the assets and staff of the state TV and radio, which the President says is functioning under a company formed through a presidential decree and hence, do not fall under the Maldives Broadcasting Corporation Act. The Tax Administration Act is an important legislation that needs to be in force prior to introduction of a tax regime as planned by the authorities.

4.1.2) The second session of the Parliament at a glance

The second session of Parliament lasted from 7th June to 30th August. Thirty six Parliamentary sittings added up to 97 hours and 23 minutes. Two hours and 42 minutes were spent per sitting on average. Eight sittings of Parliament, or 22 % of the sessions, were cancelled due to disruptions. The disruptions in Parliament were a direct result of the political turmoil that ensued towards the end of the interim period specified in the Constitution of Maldives, aggravated due to an MP being held in the presidential retreat island against his will and due to corruption allegations against MPs.

A total of 18 bills were presented to the Parliament in the second session. The government presented six bills whereas individual MPs presented 12. Fifteen pieces of legislation were endorsed by Parliament and forwarded to the President for ratification.

Legislation

Total no. of bills presented 18

Not accepted to Parliament -

Withdrawn 1

Rejected at the final voting stage -

Endorsed and sent for ratification 15

Sittings

Time-frame 7th June – 30th August

Total number of sittings 36

Total number of time spent in sittings 97 hours 23 minutes

Average time spent in each sitting 2 hours 42 minutes

Total number of sittings disrupted/cancelled 8

Percentage of sittings disrupted/cancelled 22%

The highlights of the second session of Parliament include the passage of the Public Finance Act, appointment of members to the Human Rights Commission of the Maldives, Parliament’s reaction to the resignation of the cabinet en-masse, conclusion of the interim period specified in the Constitution and arrest of four MPs on corruption and sedition charges.

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 11 PARLIAMENT WATCH

The cabinet of Maldives resigned en-masse on the 29th of July, citing Parliament obstruction of its duties as the primary cause. On the same day, two MPs were charged with corruption and sedition. A few days later, the same charges were leveled against an additional two MPs. In the ensuing political drama, the two-year interim period specified in the Constitution ended on the 8th of August. As per the Constitution, permanent institutionswere required to come in to force before the end of the period. The Parliament failed to pass the Judges bill, and hence the Supreme Court bench was not appointed. The Maldives National Defense Force, on orders from the President, blocked the interim Supreme Court and confiscated its keys. The constitutional meltdown was averted when the Judges Act was passed and the Supreme Court was appointed and sworn in. The Judges Act was passed on 10th of August, two days after the conclusion of the interim period.

4.1.3) The third session of the Parliament at a glance

The first sitting of the third session of Parliament took place on 7th June and the last sitting on 30th December. The Parliament spent 91 hours in a total of 31 sittings. The average time spent per sitting is two hours and 57 minutes. Of the 31 sittings, nine sittings of Parliament were disrupted and cancelled. This is an average of 29% of the total number of sittings. The main reason for disruption of Parliamentary sittings was the issue of cabinet endorsement. The third session of Parliament is also the budget session of the Parliament.

Eighteen bills – same as in the second session of Parliament – were submitted to Parliament in the third session. Government presented one bill and individual members presented 17 bills. A total of three bills were endorsed by Parliament and one bill failed at the final voting stage.

The highlights of the third session of Parliament include the deadlock in Parliament over the issue of

Legislation

Total no. of bills presented 18

Not accepted to Parliament -

Withdrawn 3

Rejected at the final voting stage 1

Endorsed and sent for ratification 3

Sittings

Time-frame 4th October – 30th December

Total number of sittings 31

Total number of time spent in sittings 91 hours

Average time spent in each sitting 2 hours 57 minutes

Total number of sittings disrupted/cancelled 9

Percentage of sittings disrupted/cancelled 29%

12 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

endorsement of the cabinet after its resignation en-masse in July, rejection of Presidents’ nominee to the post of Auditor General, passage of the Parliamentary Privileges Bill, passage of the state budget and amendment of the Judges Act to provide benefits to former Supreme Court judges.

The endorsement of the cabinet was a contentious issue, as MPs from the ruling MDP supported a block vote of consent while the opposition campaigned for individual endorsement of cabinet ministers. On 22nd November, the Parliament voted to approve five of 12 cabinet appointments amid an opposition boycott of the Parliament session. The issue was resolved after a verdict from Supreme Court in the first week of December, leading to the removal of the seven cabinet ministers who were not given consent by the Parliament.

Also of note in the third session of Parliament is that the President’s nominee – who was also formerly the President of the Anti Corruption Commission – to the post of Auditor General was rejected by the Parliament.

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 13 PARLIAMENT WATCH

5) Evaluation 5.1 Overall evaluation results

The evaluation is split into six areas or categories, and the broader six areas are further split into 48 sub- areas. The areas are:

1. Representativeness of the Parliament; 2. Parliamentary oversight over the executive; 3. Parliament’s legislative capacity; 4. Transparency and accessibility of Parliament; 5. Accountability of Parliament; and 6. Parliament’s involvement in international policy

The weakest area of the parliamentary evaluation is accountability of Parliament category with a score of 43%. The strongest area under evaluation is the legislative capacity of the Parliament with a score of 66%.

The overall score for all six areas under evaluation is 57%. Areas representativeness of Parliament, accountability of Parliament and Parliamentary involvement in foreign policy are below average with 56%, 43% and 54% respectively. Parliamentary oversight over the executive, legislative capacity of Parliament and transparency and accountability of Parliament are above average with scores of 59%, 66% and 66% respectively.

Figure: Overall evaluation results

Overall Percentage 57.3%

Representativeness of the Parliament 56.2%

Parliamentary oversight over the executive 58.8%

Legislative capacity of the Parliament 66.2%

Transparency & accessibility of the Parliament 65.8%

Accountability of the Parliament 43.3%

Parliamentary involvement in foreign policy 53.8%

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

14 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

5.2 Representativeness of the Parliament

The first area under evaluation is the representativeness of the Parliament. Nine sub-areas were evaluated to determine the representativeness of the Parliament. These sub-areas include: the ratio of female MPs versus male MPs; the representativeness of marginalized groups, the ease with which a person of average means be elected to Parliament, adequacy of internal party mechanisms for improving imbalances within Parliament, arrangements for ensuring opposition and minority parties/ groups to contribute to the work of Parliament, the conduciveness of Parliamentary infrastructure and unwritten mores to the participation of women and men, the right of all members to express their opinions freely and protection from executive or legal interference, and the effectiveness of the parliament as a forum for debate on questions of public concern.

The weakest aspect evaluated under the representativeness of the Parliamentis the representation of women in Parliament with a score of 30%. The sub-area scored the least of all the sub-areas under evaluation. The Parliament of Maldives has five female MPs of the total 77 MPs. The representation of women is below the average score for overall representativeness of the Parliament, which is at 56%.

The strongest aspect of the representativeness of the Parliament is the right of all MPs to express their opinions freely, without executive and legal interference. This sub-area scored 68%.

Overall percentage 56.2%

1.9 How effective is the Parliament as a forum for debate on questions of public concern? 64.5%

1.8 How secure is the right of all members to express their opinions freely, and how well are 68.2% members protected from executive or legal interference?

1.7 How conducive is the infrastructure of the Parliament, and its unwritten mores, to the 57.3% participation of women and men?

1.6 How adequate are arrangements for ensuring that opposition and minority parties or groups 62.7% and their members can effectively contribute to the work of the Parliament

1.5 How adequate are internal party arrangements for improving imbalances in 49.0% Parliamentary representation?

1.4 How easy is it for a person of average means to be elected to Parliament? 50.5% Figure: Representation of Parliament 1.3 How representative of marginalized groups and regions is the composition of Parliament? 58.3%

1.2 How representative of women is the composition of the Parliament? 30.5%

1.1 How adequately does the composition of the Parliament represent the diversity of political 64.8% opinion in the country (e.g. As reflected in votes for the respective political parties)? 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 15 PARLIAMENT WATCH

5.3 Effectiveness of Parliamentary oversight over the executive

Area two under the evaluation looks into the effectiveness of Parliamentary oversight over the executive. Eight sub-areas were evaluated to gauge the effectiveness of Parliamentary oversight over the executive. The eight sub-areas include: the rigorousness of Parliamentary procedures to question and secure information from the executive; effectiveness of Parliamentary committees in carrying out their oversight functions; the ability of the Parliament to scrutinize the state budget; the effectiveness of the Parliament to scrutinize appointments to executive posts; the ability of the Parliament to hold non-elected bodies to account; the extent to which the Parliament is autonomous from the executive; the adequacy of the expertise and support staff of Parliament; and the adequacy of research, information and other facilities available to MPs.

The weakest aspect of the effectiveness of Parliamentary oversight over the executive area is the effectiveness of the Parliamentary committees in carrying out their functions. The sub-area scored 47%.

The strongest aspect of the effectiveness of Parliamentary oversight over the executive is the autonomy of the Parliament from the executive through control over its budget, agenda, personnel etc. This sub-area scored a maximum of 79%.

The overall score for the effectiveness of Parliamentary oversight category is 59%.

Figure: Parliamentary oversight over the executive

Overall percentage 58.8%

2.8 How adequate are the research, information and other facilities available 52.0% to all members and their groups?

2.7 How adequate are the numbers and expertise of professional staff to support 52.4% members, individually and collectively, in the effective performance of their duties?

2.6 How far is parliament autonomous in practice from the executive, e.g. through 79.1% control over its own budget, agenda, timetable, personnel, etc.?

2.5 How far is parliament able to hold non-elected public bodies to account? 52.7%

2.4 How effectively can parliament scrutinize appointments to executive 67.3% posts, and hold their occupants to account?

2.3 How well is parliament able to influence and scrutinize the national 60.0% budget, through all its stages?

2.2 How effective are specialist committees in carrying out their 46.7% oversight function?

2.1 How rigorous and systematic are the procedures whereby members can 60.0% question the executive and secure adequate information from it? 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0

16 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

5.4 Effectiveness of the legislative capacity of the Parliament

The effectiveness of the legislative capacity of the Parliament was determined via evaluation of seven sub-areas. The seven sub-areas consisted of the procedures for subjecting draft legislation to open debate in Parliament; the effectiveness of committee procedures for scrutinizing and amending draft legislation; the transparency and systems through which the legislations are subject to consultation with relevant groups and interests; the adequacy of the opportunities afforded to individual members to introduce draft legislation; the effectiveness of the Parliament in ensuring clear, concise and intelligible legislation; the carefulness of the Parliament in ensuring that legislation is consistent with the Constitution and human rights principles; and the carefulness of the Parliament in ensuring a gender equality perspective in its work.

The weakest sub-area for the effectiveness of Parliament’s legislative capacity is the carefulness of the Parliament is ensuring that the legislation enacted is clear, concise and intelligible. The sub-area scored 53% while the average for the effectiveness of Parliament’s legislative capacity is 66%. The effectiveness of Parliament’s legislative capacity category scored the highest of all the main areas under evaluation.

The strongest sub-areas are the adequacy of opportunity for individual MPs to introduce draft legislation and the satisfactoriness of procedures for subjecting draft legislation to open debate in Parliament. Both sub-areas scored 80%.

Figure: Parliament’s legislative capacity

Overall percentage 66.2%

3.7 How careful is the Parliament in ensuring a gender-equality perspective 60.0% in its work?

3.6 How careful is the Parliament in ensuring that legislation enacted is 57.3% consistent with the constitution and the human rights of the population?

3.5 How effective is the Parliament in ensuring that legislation enacted is 52.7% clear, concise and intelligible?

3.4 How adequate are the opportunities for individual members to introduce 80.0% draft legislation?

3.3 How systematic and transparent are the procedures for consultation with 68.6% relevant groups and interests in the course of legislation?

3.2 How effective are committee procedures for scrutinizing and 64.5% amending draft legislation?

3.1 How satisfactory are the procedures for subjecting draft legislation to full 80.0% and open debate in parliament?

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 17 PARLIAMENT WATCH

5.5 Transparency and accessibility of the Parliament

The fourth area under evaluation is transparency and accessibility of the Parliament. The seven sub-areas for the fourth area are the openness and accessibility of the proceedings of the Parliament and its committees to the media; the freedom for journalists to report on parliament and activities of MPs; the effectiveness of the Parliament to inform the public of its work; the successfulness of Parliament in creating interest about its work among the youth; the adequacy for electors to express their opinions and concerns directly to their MPs; the ease of the procedures to make submissions to Parliamentary committees; and the opportunity for citizens for direct involvement in legislation.

The weakest sub-area under the broader transparency and accessibility of the Parliament area is the opportunity for citizens for direct involvement in legislation through citizen’s initiatives and referenda with a score of 50%.

With a maximum score of 85%, the strongest sub-area for the transparency and accessibility of the Parliament area is the freedom for journalists to report on parliament and activities of MPs. Incidentally, this is the sub-area with the highest score.

The overall transparency and accessibility of Parliament evaluation area scored 66%.

Figure: The transparency and accessibility of the parliament

Overall percentage 65.8%

4.7 How much opportunity do citizens have for direct involvement in legislation (e.g. 50.0% through citizens’ initiatives, referenda, etc.)?

4.6 How user-friendly is the procedure for individuals and groups to make 62.7% submissions to a Parliamentary committee or commission of enquiry?

4.5 How adequate are the opportunities for electors to express their views and 62.9% concerns directly to their representatives, regardless of party affiliation?

4.4 How extensive and successful are attempts to interest young people in the 59.0% work of Parliament?

4.3 How effective is the Parliament in informing the public about its work, 58.2% through a variety of channels?

4.2 How free from restrictions are journalists in reporting on parliament and 84.8% the activities of its members?

4.1 How open and accessible to the media and the public are the proceedings of the 82.7% Parliament and its committees?

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0

18 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

5.6 The accountability of the Parliament

The interviewees were asked seven questions to evaluate the accountability of the Parliament. They are: systematic arrangements for MPs to report to their constituencies of their performance in office; effectiveness of the electoral system in ensuring the accountability of parliament; effectiveness of the system for ensuring adherence to agreed codes of conduct by MPs; the robustness and transparency procedures for preventing conflict of financial and other interests; adequacy of the oversight of party and candidate funding in ensuring MPs preserve independence in the performance of their duties; public acceptability of the system of MP’s salary determination; and systems to monitor and review levels of public confidence of the Parliament.

The weakest sub-area of the category is the public acceptability of the system whereby MP’s salaries are determined. The sub-area scored the minimum score of 37%.

The strongest sub-area under the category is the effectiveness of the electoral system in ensuring the accountability of Parliament individually and collectively to the electorate with a score of 55%.

The average score for the accountability of Parliament category is 43%. This is also the area that scored the least of all the main six areas under evaluation.

Figure: The accountability of the parliament

Overall percentage 43.3%

5.7 How systematic is the monitoring and review of levels of public confidence in 41.8% Parliament?

5.6 How publicly acceptable is the system whereby members’ salaries are 37.3% determined?

5.5 How adequate is the oversight of party and candidate funding to ensure that 41.9% members preserve independence in the performance of their duties?

5.4 How transparent and robust are the procedures for preventing conflicts of 41.0% financial and other interest in the conduct of Parliamentary business?

5.3 How effective is the system for ensuring the observance of agreed codes of conduct 43.8% by members?

5.2 How effective is the electoral system in ensuring the accountability of the 55.2% Parliament, individually and collectively, to the electorate?

5.1 How systematic are arrangements for members to report to their constituents 41.9% about their performance in office?

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 19 PARLIAMENT WATCH

5.7 Effectiveness of the Parliament’s involvement in international policy

Ten sub-areas were evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the Parliament’s involvement in international policy. The sub-areas include: the effectiveness of the Parliament to contribute and scrutinize the government’s foreign policy; timeliness and adequacy of the information available to the Parliament about the governments negotiating positions in regional and global bodies; the ability of the Parliament to influence legal or financing commitments made by the government in international forums; effectiveness of the Parliament in ensuring that international commitments are implemented at national level; effectiveness of the Parliament in scrutinizing and contributing to national reports to international monitoring mechanisms and its follow-up; effectiveness of the Parliament’s monitoring of the government’s development policy; rigorousness of Parliamentary oversight of deployment of the states armed forces abroad; effectiveness of the Parliament in inter-parliamentary cooperation at regional and global levels; and the ability of the Parliament to scrutinize the policies and performance of international bodies to which its government contributes financial and human resources.

The weakest sub-area under the effectiveness of the Parliament’s involvement in international policy category is the adequacy and timeliness of information available to Parliament about the government’s negotiating position in regional and global bodies. This sub-area scored 44%.

The strongest sub-area under the category is effectiveness of the Parliament in inter-parliamentary cooperation at regional and global levels with a score of 70%.

The overall score for the main area under evaluation is 54%.

20 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

Figure: Parliament’s involvement in international policy

Overall percentage 53.8%

6.10 How far is the Parliament able to scrutinize the policies and performance of international organizations like the UN, World Bank and the 48.4% IMF to which its government contributes financial, human and material resources?

6.9 How effective is the Parliament in inter-parliamentary cooperation at regional 70.5% and global levels?

6.8 How active is the Parliament in fostering political dialogue for conflict-resolution, both at 50.5% home and abroad?

6.7 How rigorous is Parliamentary oversight of the deployment of the country’s armed forces 61.7% abroad?

6.6 How effective is Parliamentary monitoring of the government’s development policy, 49.0% whether as “donor” or “recipient” of international development aid?

6.5 How effectively is the Parliament able to scrutinize and contribute to national reports to 50.5% international monitoring mechanisms and ensuring follow-up on their recommendations?

6.4 How effective is the Parliament in ensuring that international commitments are 52.7% implemented at the national level?

6.3 How far is the Parliament able to influence the binding legal or financing commitments 55.2% made by the government in international fora, such as the UN?

6.2 How adequate and timely is the information available to the Parliament about 43.6% the government’s negotiating positions in regional and universal/global bodies?

6.1 How effectively is the Parliamentable to scrutinize and contribute to the government’s 56.2% foreign policy?

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 21 PARLIAMENT WATCH

6) Recommendations

1. Increase participation of women in the Parliament and bring gender perspective into legislation. Of the total 77 MPs in Parliament, only five are women. Political parties need to work pro- actively to reduce the barriers for women to enter the political sphere. The Parliament should introduce measures in the legislation that encourage women participation. The Parliament must also take the gender perspective into consideration in the development of legislation.

2. Develop infrastructure and human resource capacity of the Parliament. Most of the MPs interviewed for the evaluation noted that the infrastructure of the Parliament and the human resource capacity of the Parliament as insufficient for the functions of the Parliament. As a long-term strategy, the Parliament must develop its infrastructure, including increasing office space for the functioning of Parliamentary standing and temporary committees. Building the human resource capacity of Parliament’s staff is also important.

3. Improve the documentation and the accessibility of the documents of the Parliament. The documents produced in Parliament need to be improved. Inconsistencies and documents not being produced in a timely manner is an issue of concern. The consistent accessibility of these documents – such as draft bills, committee reports, agenda’s and minutes of meetings – need to be improved.

4. Conduct financial/ governance impact of legislation before passage of bills. The bills must ensure non-conflict with other legislations. The Parliament must incorporate a process at the committee stage to determine the financial and governance impact of legislations before their passage. The Parliament must institutionalize proper mechanisms for review of legislation before passage to ensure non-conflict with other legislations. Some of the legislations, such as parts of the Decentralization Act that deals with finance and the Public Finance Act passed by Parliament in the year 2010 have conflicting clauses.

5. Increase consultation with relevant interest groups during the different stages of legislation. Increased consultation with stakeholders of legislation will ensure the tenability of legislation and eliminate issues in the implementation of the law. In addition, consultatory processes produce better legislation and ensure inclusiveness. Mandatory consultation with target/relevant stakeholders must be institutionalized in the Parliamentary processes.

6. Prioritize bills and issues of national interest. The Parliament must prioritize issues and work of draft legislation at committee stage that are of national interest over other work of the Parliament. Key bills that relate to the functions of

22 An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives PARLIAMENT WATCH

the state and preservation of justice such as the evidence bill, right to information bill, political parties bill, penal code bill and drugs bill remain stagnated at committee stage. In addition, the Parliament must produce an action plan for each sitting in consultation with the government, political parties and others involved.

7. Conduct education programs for the public on the work of the Parliament, with a specific focus on newly passed legislation and the integrity mechanisms of the Parliament. It is important to conduct education programs for the public and other stakeholders since almost all the legislations enacted introduce completely new systems. It is also important to educate the public on the integrity mechanisms of the Parliament and on the general functioning of the Parliament to increase public trust and interest in the works of Parliament.

8. Improve the accessibility of the documents produced by Parliament through betterment of the Parliamentary website, use of social media such as Twitter and Facebook.

9. Fulfill the arliament’sP constitutional duty by publicizing financial and other interests of MPs. The Parliament currently does not disclose the financial and other interests of MPs that the constitution mandates MPs submit to Parliament. The Parliament should fulfill its constitutional duty by disclosing this information to the public. The disclosure of financial and other interests should also extend to the immediate children of the MP and spouse as well as the MPs’ parents.

10. Improve the functioning of the Parliamentary committees. The Parliament must allocate a time frame for specific works, including time frames for scrutiny of draft legislation before presentation to the Parliament floor. This is to prevent bills from stagnating in Parliamentary committees.

11. Employ more resources, including renting extra office space for Parliamentary committees to expedite its work. External professional and technical expertise must also be utilized in the functioning of the committees to produce robust legislation.

12. Political parties should resolve contentious issues prior to commencement of sittings to prevent disruptions/cancellation of Parliamentary sittings. A total of 22 of 95 sittings were disrupted, leading to waste of Parliamentary time and resources.

13. The Parliament should adopt in its Rules of Procedures measures to incentivize MPs to consult their respective constituencies in drafting, debating and voting on legislations and motions. Parliamentary Rules of Procedures must also accomodate provisions that ensure monies/ allowances provided to MPs is spent for its actual intended purpose. For example, MPs are provided an allowance for establishment of an office. Few MPs (if any at all) operate offices.

An Evaluation of the Parliament of Maldives 23

AHMED EASA (0040) ABDULLA MAUSOOM (0030) VISAM ALI(0047) MOHAMED GASAM (0079) AHMED NIHANHUSSAIN MANIK(0025) AHMED MOOSA (0053) HAMDHOON ABDULLAHAMEED(0046) MOHAMED HUSSAIN (0030) HAMID ABDULGAFOOR (0017) MOHAMED MUJTHAZ (0031) NAZIM RASHAAD(0048) ALI WAHEED (0058) IBRAHIM RIZA (0056) MOHAMED RIYAZ (0077) RIYAZ RASHEED(0069) MOHAMED RAMIZ(0076) ALI MOHAMED(0042) ALI ARIF(0033) AFRASHIM ALI(0044) ALI RIZA (0037) ZAHIR ADAM (0082) MOHAMED RAFEEQ HASSAN (0083) SHIFAQ MUFEED(0084) ALI SALEEM (0039) ABDUL RAHEEMABDULLA(0074) ALHAAN FAHMEE (0087) ABDUL GAFOOR MOOSA (0034) MOHMED NASHEED -KUTTI (0035) MOHMED NASHEED-KUTTI EVA ABDULLA(0018) ROZAINA ADAM (0055) MOHAMED MUSTHAFA (0070) MOHAMED THORIQ(0041) RUGGIYYA MOHAMED(0060) IBRAHIM RASHEED(0024) MOOSA ZAMEER (0071) AHMED THASMEENALI(0050) AHMED RASHEEDIBRAHIM(0072) MOHAMED ASLAM(0089) HASSAN LATHEEF (0091) AHMED MAHLOOF (0019) MOHAMED NASHIZ(0043) IMTHIYAZ FAHMEE (0022) MOHAMED SHIFAZ (0028) AHMED SIYAAM MOHAMED (0067) ALI AZIM(0016) HUSSAIN MOHAMED(0057) AHMED MOHAMED(0052) ABDULLA ABDURAHEEM(0023) IBRAHIM MOHAMEDSOLIH(0051) AHMED SAMEER (0029) ABSENT NVT (ABSTAIN) TOTAL VOTES VOTE -(NO) VOTE 0(NUETRAL) VOTE +(YES) ABDULLA SHAHID(SPEAKER) ISMAIL ABDULHAMEED(0054) ABDULLA MASEEHMOHAMED(0085) YOOSUF NAEEM(0061) ILHAM AHMED(0078) YOOSUF ABDULGAFOOR (0073) HASSAN ADIL(0088) AHMED HAMZA (0065) HUSSAIN WAHEED (0038) IBRAHIM MUTHALIB(0081) AHMED NAZIM(0063) ABDULLA YAAMIN (0064) -CARNAL(0032) ABDUL MUHSINHAMEED(0066) QASIM IBRAHIM(0059) MOHAMED RASHEED(0021) (0075) ABDUL AZEEZ JAMAAL ABU-BAKURU AHMED SALEEM (0049) MOHAMED ZUBAIR (0045) AHMED RASHEED(0026) MOHAMED RASHEED(0090) MOHAMED NAZIM(0080) MARIYA AHMEDDIDI(0020) ILYAS LABEEB(0086) MOOSA MANIK(0015) AHMED AMIR(0068) AHMED ABDULLA(0027) MDP DRP DRP MDP DRP INDP DRP DRP MDP DRP MDP DRP IND MDP DQP DRP DRP DRP DRP MDP MDP DRP MDP DRP PA MDP MDP IND MDP DRP MDP MDP MDP MDP PA DRP PA MDP DRP DRP DRP MDP MDP INDP DRP DRP DRP DRP MDP MDP DRP IND DRP DRP DRP PA MDP MDP MDP JP PA PA MDP DRP JP MDP PA IND IND MDP MDP MDP MDP MDP MDP IND MDP Party affilition NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT 7 6 63 2 2 59 a a a a a 0 a a _ _ 0 02-03-2010 Majlis Gavaidhu Faaskurumah NVT a 8 1 67 0 0 67 a a a a a a a 03-03-2010 Clemency board ah galolhu dhekunu dhaairaage membarun Ahmed Mahloof hamajehsumah _ NVT a 8 1 67 1 0 66 a a a a a a a 03-03-2010 Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT a 8 5 63 0 1 62 a a 0 a a a a a 03-03-2010 Parliamentary service gavaaidhu faaskuran NVT a 8 1 67 0 0 67 a a a a a a a “03-03-2010 Bill Kuriah gendhiumah- Mauloomaathu hoadha libigathumuge hahguge bill” a a _ NVT 0 5 1 70 2 1 67 a _ a a 08-03-2010 tax negumuge idhaaree bill islaah thakaaeku faaskuran NVT a NVT _ NVT a 5 3 68 2 0 66 a a _ a 08-03-2010 khaasaehyah beyunvaa meehunge hahguthahrahkaatherikurumaaibehey bill comitah fonuva 0 a 0 a a a 10 0 66 0 2 64 a a a a a a 09-03-2010 Bill kuriah gendhiumah_Pre-school hingumuge bill a 2 0 73 0 0 73 a 16-03-2010 cedaw ge article 7(A)’ massala _ a _ _ _ _ NVT ______2 1 72 30 1 41 _ _ _ a ______0 _ 16-03-2010 Bill Kuriah gendhiumah Maalihyathu Gaanoon islaah bill a 2 0 73 0 0 73 a 16-03-2010 Bill Kuriah gendhiumah Sharuee Court thakuge bill _ _ a a ______NVT NVT _ a 0 _ 0 _ _ _ _ a _ 0 _ _ 0 0 _ 9 2 65 35 8 22 a 0 a _ a 0 _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ a a 17-03-2010 hamza’ge hushalhenun (comity thakah membarun hovumuge mahsala alun comity ah fonuvumah) a a a a 0 NVT NVT 9 2 65 5 4 56 a 0 a a 0 _ _ 0 _ a _ a _ 17-03-2010 Huriha commity’ehkko comityn ninmevigothah faaskuran a a a a a a NVT 14 1 61 0 0 61 a a a a a a a a 22-03-2010 Bill balaigathumah idhaaree dhaairaatha laamarukazee usoolun hingumuge Bill a a a a 5 1 70 1 0 69 a _ NVT 22-03-2010 Bill balaigathumah (Masthuvathakehchabehey Bill 2009) a _ a a a 6 1 69 33 1 35 a 0 _ _ NVT ______a ______22-03-2010 Moh.Mujthaz_11 Mem.Commity (idhaaree dhaairaa..bill fonuvumah) _ a a 4 1 71 9 4 58 _ _ _ _ a _ a _ 0 _ 0 0 0 _ 29-03-2010 Bill balaigathumah anhenunnah lui loan dhinumuge bill _ a _ a 4 0 72 28 1 43 ______a _ 0 _ _ a ______29-03-2010 Proposal-Abdulla Abdulraheem (auditor general mahsala) _ _ a _ _ _ 4 1 71 35 1 35 0 _ a NVT ______a ______a ______30-03-2010 verikankuraa rahrah kandaelhumuge bill _ _ a _ _ 4 1 71 34 0 37 NVT _ _ a ______a ______a ______30-03-2010 abdhulla abdhuraheem’11 memberunge commity ah fonuvan (verikankuraa rah...bill) _ a _ 4 1 71 29 0 42 _ NVT ______a ______a _ _ a ______30-03-2010 meesmeehunge minivan kamah huras elhumaabehey bill a a a a a a 32 0 44 20 6 18 a 0 _ a a _ _ _ a _ _ _ a _ _ a a a _ a a a a _ _ _ a _ _ _ 0 _ a 0 0 a a a a a _ 0 a _ a a a a 0 a a “31-03-2010 birudhehkumaai nurahkaatheri hathiyaaraai thoonu ehchethi gengulhun manaakurumuge billge ibthidhaaey bahusge maruhalaa sihru jalsaehge gothugai kuriah gendhiumah” a 7 1 68 0 0 68 NVT a a a a a a 05-04-2010 Bill Balaigathumah (Tourist hidhumahdhey thanthanun vihkaa thakehchai dhey hidhumathuge agun tax negumuge bill) a 7 3 66 0 0 66 NVT NVT NVT a a a a a a 05-04-2010 Bill Balaigathumah (Aanmu sihkhathu rahkaatherikurumuge bill) _ _ _ a _ _ _ 8 0 68 23 3 42 0 _ 0 _ 0 _ a ______a a a a a _ _ _ _ _ a _ _ 06-04-2010 Bill Faaskurumah (Maldives Broadcasting Corporation Gaaimkurumuge bill) a 8 1 67 0 0 67 a a a a a a NVT a “06-04-2010 Bill Balaigathumah (5/2009)Ehgamu dhathuru fathuru...Islaah bill” a 8 0 68 0 1 67 a a a a a a a 06-04-2010 Bill Balaigathumah (Banking bill) a 8 0 68 0 0 68 a a a a a a a 06-04-2010 Bill Faaskurumah- verikan badhaluvumuge maruhalaage bill a 10 0 66 0 0 66 a a a a a a a a a 07-04-2010 birudhekkumaabehey bill majleehah balaigathumah a a 7 1 68 0 0 68 a NVT a a a a 12-04-2010 Convention on the recognition and Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards Proposal-Moosa Manik-convention comity ah a NVT 6 1 69 0 1 68 a a a a a 0 12-04-2010 UN,WTO,Swiss Gov Iruthisham Adam -safeerukamah _ _ a _ _ _ 6 0 70 22 2 46 _ 0 _ _ a a ______a _ _ a a _ _ 0 _ _ _ 12-04-2010 Bill balaigathumah (Civil service Qanoonah islaah geneumuge bill) _ _ _ _ _ a _ _ _ NVT _ _ _ 6 1 69 33 2 34 ______0 _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ a _ a _ _ a _ a _ _ _ a 12-04-2010 Bill balaigathumah (Kuhkurun huhtuvumahtakai khaahsa fiyavalhu bill) elhumuge 0 0 _ 0 a 0 _ 6 0 70 3 8 59 0 0 a a _ a a a 0 0 12-04-2010 Bill faaskurumah (2009/5 ehgamu dhathuru fathuruge Qaanoon ah islaah geneumuge bill) a a a NVT a 8 1 67 0 0 67 a a a a 13-04-2010 Broadcast Bill balaigathumah a 0 0 0 NVT NVT NVT 0 a a _ _ 7 3 64 14 5 45 _ a a _ _ a 0 _ a ______14-04-2010 dhiriulheythanthan kuyya dhookurumuge bill majlis ah balaigathumah a a 0 _ a NVT 4 1 71 2 1 68 _ a 19-04-2010 Bill Balaigathun 99/2 _ _ a a _ _ 0 _ _ a ______4 0 72 53 4 15 ______0 ______a 0 0 ______19-04-2010 dhivehiraajje ah genaun manaa thakethy ge bill majleehah balagathun 75/4 a a _ a NVT NVT 4 2 70 2 0 68 _ a 19-04-2010 siyaasee party bill majlis ah balaigathun 75/4 a a a a a 9 0 67 0 0 67 a a a a 20-04-2010 Ameen Aamu Magaamah G.S. kindharuge Ahmed Mohamed ayyanukurun a _ _ 0 a a _ _ 3 0 73 12 4 57 _ 0 _ _ _ _ 0 _ 0 _ _ 26-04-2010 Garaaru balaigathun - Nasheed (majlis gavaidhu..etc) _ _ a _ _ a _ a _ _ _ _ 3 0 73 38 0 35 ______26-04-2010 Garaaru balaigathun - Sameer a a a a a a a a a a 33 0 43 1 0 42 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a _ a a 28-04-2010 Faaskurumah-Idhaaree dhaairaathah laamarukazi usoolun hingumuge bill islaahuthakaaekoh _ _ a a 10 0 66 36 0 30 _ a a _ a a ______a a _ a _ _ _ a 29-04-2010 to extend the term until the DB & LCE is done (Mariya A. Didi ge Hushahelhun _ Ali Waheeds garaaru) 0 a _ a _ 9 6 61 6 10 45 a a 0 0 NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT a a 0 0 _ _ 0 _ a a _ 0 0 0 a 0 29-04-2010 sending the extension time to a special committee according to 16b of majlis gavaidhu…etc (ali waheed’s garaaru) a a _ 9 0 67 6 1 60 a a 0 _ _ _ a a _ _ a a a 29-04-2010 Moosa Manik ge hushahelhun - majlis gavaaidhah islaah a a a NVT NVT 11 2 63 0 0 63 a a a a a a a a 04-05-2010 Bill Balaigathumah (Copy rights) _ _ a _ _ _ a _ _ NVT _ NVT NVT NVT NVT a _ _ _ 10 5A 61 21 2 38 0 _ _ _ a a _ a _ a a _ a a _ 0 _ _ _ 04-05-2010 Bill Faaskurumah (Local Council Bill) March 2011 are valid asof affiliations NOTE: Party records parliamentary of voting asin NOTE: titles Moosa Manik(0015) Ahmed Abdulla(0027) Mariya AhmedDidi(0020) Ahmed Sameer(0029) Ali Saleem(0039) VOTE +(YES) Abdulla Shahid(speaker) Abdulla Yaamin (0064) Ilham Ahmed(0078) Abdul RaheemAbdulla(0074) Afrashim Ali(0044) Abdul Gafoor Moosa(0034) Ahmed Moosa(0053) NVT (ABSTAIN) TOTAL VOTES VOTE -(NO) VOTE 0(NUETRAL) Mohamed Musthafa (0070) Visam Ali(0047) Mohamed Hussain(0030) Ahmed RasheedIbrahim (0072) Mohamed Mujthaz(0031) Yoosuf Naeem(0061) Mohamed Nashiz(0043) ABSENT Ali Riza (0037) Imthiyaz Fahmee (0022) Alhaan Fahmee (0087) Ahmed Saleem(0049) Ahmed Rasheed(0026) Ali Waheed (0058) Mohamed Gasam(0079) Qasim Ibrahim (0059) Abdulla Abduraheem (0023) Mohamed Aslam(0089) (0046) Hamdhoon AbdullaHameed Ibrahim Rasheed(0024) Hassan Latheef (0091) Rozaina Adam(0055) Mohamed Riyaz (0077) Ahmed Hamza (0065) (0025) Ahmed NihanHussainManik Ali Mohamed(0042) Abdul MuhsinHameed(0066) Ruggiyya Mohamed(0060) Mohamed Ramiz(0076) Ismail AbdulHameed(0054) Mohamed Thoriq(0041) Mohamed Rasheed(0021) Hussain Mohamed(0057) Ahmed Mohamed(0052) Mohamed Nazim(0080) Yoosuf AbdulGafoor (0073) Mohmed Nasheed-Kutti (0035) Ahmed Mahloof(0019) Nazim Rashaad(0048) (0075) Abdul Azeez JamaalAbu-Bakuru Abdulla Mausoom(0030) Mohamed Zubair(0045) Ahmed Nazim(0063) Ibrahim MohamedSolih(0051) Moosa Zameer (0071) Hassan Adil(0088) Hussain Waheed (0038) (0085) Abdulla MaseehMohamed Shifaq Mufeed (0084) Ilyas Labeeb(0086) Ibrahim Riza (0056) Ali Arif(0033) Hamid AbdulGafoor (0017) Eva Abdulla(0018) (0032) Mohamed Nasheed-carnal Ibrahim Muthalib(0081) Mohamed Rafeeq Hassan(0083) Ali Azim(0016) Mohamed Shifaz (0028) Mohamed Rasheed(0090) Ahmed Easa (0040) Riyaz Rasheed(0069) Zahir Adam(0082) Ahmed ThasmeenAli(0050) Ahmed Amir(0068) Ahmed Siyaam Mohamed(0067) MDP MDP MDP MDP DRP DRP PA DRP PA DRP MDP INDP MDP DRP DRP PA DRP DRP DRP MDP MDP MDP IND MDP DRP MDP JP DRP MDP DRP MDP DRP DRP MDP MDP DRP DRP DRP MDP DRP IND MDP MDP DRP DRP MDP PA IND DRP MDP PA DRP IND PA MDP PA MDP MDP DRP MDP MDP IND DRP MDP MDP MDP JP DRP DRP MDP MDP MDP DQP MDP DRP IND INDP Party affilition 14 0 62 1 1 60 a a a a a a a a a a a a _ a 0 a 07-06-2010 local council bill commity ah fonuvun _ _ NVT NVT NVT 12 3 61 4 3 54 0 a a a a a a a a _ a a _ a 0 a 0 07-06-2010 local c. bill 11 memberunge vaguthi commity ah NVT a a a 16 1 59 0 0 59 a a a a a a a a a a a a a 08-06-2010 Bill balaigathumah - thalasimiya control kurumuge bill 16 0 60 0 0 60 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 08-06-2010 Garaaru balaigathumah - gaanoonu asaasi ai thaaarus vaa gaanoonu.. (Mohamed Nasheed) 15 0 61 0 0 61 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 08-06-2010 9 mem. commity list - Mohamed Nasheed Garaaru 0 0 17 1 58 0 6 52 a NVT a 0 a a a a 0 a 0 a a a 0 a a a a a a a 09-06-2010 Bill balaigathumah - Imthiyaaz Bill 0 a 17 0 59 1 3 55 _ a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 09-06-2010 11 mem. commity list - Imthiyaaz Bill _ 17 1 58 9 5 44 0 _ NVT a _ _ _ a 0 _ a a a 0 a 0 0 a _ a a a _ _ a a a a a a a 09-06-2010 Bill balaigathumah - Private security Bill NVT NVT NVT 11 3 62 1 0 61 a _ a a a a a a a a a a 14-06-2010 Finance Ministry ge masakai 0 NVT NVT 11 2 63 0 1 62 a a a a a a a a a a a 14-06-2010 Housing Ministry ge masaikai 11 1 64 2 1 61 _ a _ a a a a 0 a a a a a a 14-06-2010 Education Ministry ge masaikai 10 4 62 1 1 60 NVT NVT a NVT NVT a a _ a a a a 0 a a a 15-06-2010 dhivehibas himaayah kurumuge bill balaigathun 0 6 0 70 19 8 43 _ 0 _ 0 a _ _ _ _ 0 _ a _ a _ _ 0 _ _ 0 a _ 0 _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ a a “16-06-2010 Bill balaigathumah-Gaanoon asaasyah 1 vana islaah geneumuge bill” 6 4 66 6 6 54 0 NVT NVT NVT NVT a 0 0 0 a a _ _ _ 0 a _ _ 0 _ a a 16-06-2010 11 mem. committy ah fonuvumah 6 12 58 3 9 46 _ 0 0 _ NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT 0 NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT a 0 0 a a 0 _ a 0 0 0 a a 16-06-2010 11 mem. committy list 5 0 71 0 1 70 a a a a a 0 21-06-2010 dheenee ebbaivantha kamuge bill 4 0 72 30 0 42 _ a a ______a ______a ______21-06-2010 civil service (islaah bill) faaskuran 5 0 71 0 0 71 a a a a a 22-06-2010 Bill balaigathumah-Qaumee sikhi Insurance bill 0 5 1 70 1 3 66 NVT a 0 0 _ a a a a 22-06-2010 Qaumee sikhi insuarance bill- 11 mem. Committee list 5 1 70 37 1 32 ______NVT ______a 0 ______a _ a a ______a ______22-06-2010 Bill balaigathumah-Idharee dhaairaathah laamarukazy usoolun hingumuge Gaanoon ah islaah geneumuge bil 5 1 70 0 1 69 NVT a a a a 0 a 22-06-2010 Bill faaskurumah-Khaasa eheyah beynunva meehunge haguge Bill 1 0 75 41 2 32 _ _ _ 0 ______0 ______a ______23-06-2010 qaumee university bill islaahaa eky faaskuran 1 0 75 0 4 71 0 0 a 0 0 23-06-2010 qaumee university bill faasnuvumun anburaa commity ah fonuvumah 0 1 8 67 10 9 48 _ _ 0 _ _ 0 NVT NVT NVT _ NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT 0 _ 0 0 a 0 _ _ _ _ 0 0 23-06-2010 Abdul azeez jamaal abubakuruge garaaru faaskurumah 142--144--majlis gavaidhah _ 1 0 75 31 3 41 ______0 _ 0 ______a _ _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ 23-06-2010 verikan kuraa rah rah kanda elhumuge bill 0 2 0 74 2 12 60 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 a 0 0 a _ 0 0 0 28-06-2010 Counselor .General ahmed abdhula didi _ 2 0 74 33 0 41 ______a ______a ______28-06-2010 Bill Islaahaeky faaskuran (maaliyyathu qanoon) ______a _ _ _ 3 2 71 31 1 39 _ _ NVT NVT _ _ _ a _ 0 _ a ______29-06-2010 idhaary dhairaa laamarukazy usoolun... billge islaah hassan latheef ______a _ _ _ _ 3 1 72 29 1 42 _ _ _ a _ _ a NVT _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ 29-06-2010 police bill_ibrahim muthalib _ _ _ _ a _ _ a 2 2 72 8 4 60 0 NVT NVT 0 _ 0 _ 0 29-06-2010 sulook report balaigathun _ _ _ a a a _ _ a _ a a _ a _ _ 26 0 50 17 0 33 a a _ a a _ _ a a a _ a a _ a a _ a _ a a a _ a a a a 12-07-2010 Imthiyazge mahsala 0 a 4 0 72 0 4 68 a 0 a a 12-07-2010 Maldives Broadcasting coorporation Directors Board - Ali Shareef _ a _ _ _ 4 1 71 38 3 30 a _ NVT _ _ 0 0 _ _ 0 ______a ______a ______12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Naushad Mohamed a 4 1 71 0 1 70 a 0 a a 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Nahula Ali 0 a _ _ _ 4 2 70 37 8 25 0 _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ NVT NVT ______0 _ 0 a _ _ _ 0 _ 0 0 ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Ibrahim Hussain Shihab _ _ _ a _ _ 4 0 72 27 2 43 ______0 _ a ______a 0 _ a _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Mohamed Shafraz Hafiz

a _ _ _ 4 0 72 39 6 27 0 _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ 0 ______0 a _ _ _ 0 _ 0 ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Niyaz Ibrahim _ a _ _ _ _ _ 4 0 71 35 1 35 _ _ _ 0 ______a NVT ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Ibrahim Khaleel a 0 _ 4 0 71 1 3 67 0 a 0 NVT a a 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Ibrahim Umar Manik a _ _ _ 4 0 72 35 5 32 _ _ 0 _ 0 _ _ 0 ______0 a _ _ _ 0 ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Easa Adam a _ 4 0 72 37 6 29 0 _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ 0 ______0 a _ _ _ 0 _ 0 ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Hassan Manik 4 0 72 38 0 34 _ _ _ a ______a ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Mohamed Waheedh 0 0 0 4 2 70 0 16 54 0 0 0 0 0 NVT NVT 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a a 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Ali Shamaan 4 0 72 36 0 36 _ _ _ _ a ______a ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Miusam Abbas 4 0 72 0 1 71 0 a a a a 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Musthansir Mumthaz 4 0 72 2 2 68 0 a _ _ a 0 a a 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Aishath Dhiyana Thohir _ 4 0 72 38 2 32 0 _ _ a _ _ _ 0 ______a ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Adam Shareef 4 2 70 0 0 70 a NVT NVT a a a 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Abdulhameed Abdulsamadh 4 0 72 0 1 71 a a a 0 a 12-07-2010 MBC.DB-Iqbal Adam _ _ _ _ 4 1 71 28 0 43 _ a ______NVT a ______a _ _ a _ 12-07-2010 Imthiyaz Committy ah fonuvumah (ah mahloof) _ _ _ _ 0 _ a 4 0 72 26 3 43 ______a _ 0 _ 0 ______a _ _ a 12-07-2010 Local Council Bill faaskurumah a a 9 0 67 0 0 67 a a a a a a a 13-07-2010 Maldives inland Revenue Authority.Com General Tax (MIRA CGT)-Yazyd Moham ed 7 0 69 0 1 68 a a a 0 a a a a 13-07-2010 MIRA.DCGT-Hassan Zareer 6 0 70 0 1 69 a a a a a a 13-07-2010 MIRA.DB-Abbas Adhil Riza 6 0 70 37 1 32 _ _ _ a a ______a a 0 ______a _ _ _ _ a _ _ 13-07-2010 MIRA.DB-Aathira Ali 6 0 70 0 0 70 a a a a a a 13-07-2010 MIRA.DB-Hassan Waheed 6 0 70 0 0 70 a a a a a a 13-07-2010 MIRA.DB-Ahmed Mohamed a a 6 0 70 0 0 70 a a a a 13-07-2010 MIRA DB aishath Lulua hassan a 6 3 67 0 1 66 a 0 NVT NVT NVT a a a a 13-07-2010 MIRA.DB-Hussain Siraj _ _ _ _ _ a a 6 0 70 31 0 39 ______a a ______a _ _ a _ 13-07-2010 Idhaaree dhaairaathah laamarukazi usoolun hingumuge Qaanoon geneumuge Bill balaigathumah (Mahloof) _ _ _ _ a _ 3 1 72 28 1 43 ______NVT _ _ 0 _ a ______a _ 14-07-2010 Ammu salaamathee committee report on Guantanamo Bay (SIC) prisoners- Ali Waheed _ _ _ _ a 3 0 73 30 2 41 _ _ _ 0 ______a _ 0 ______a _ 14-07-2010 civil service qanoon islaahu faaskurun -Ali Azim’s Proporsal 3 1 72 0 0 72 a NVT a a 14-07-2010 National Archive Bill balaigathumah 3 1 72 1 1 70 a NVT 0 a _ a 14-07-2010 Belgium (SIC) Safeerukamah - Adam Hassan a 4 2 70 0 3 67 NVT a NVT 0 0 a 0 a 14-07-2010 Aanmu ijthimaaey mingandhuthakaa Khilaafu amaluthah huhtumu Bill faaskurumah 7 2 67 1 0 66 a a a _ NVt NVT a a a a 02-08-2010 (HRC) memberunge nanfulhutha dhiraasaakurumah 7 memberunge commity 6 2 68 1 3 64 a a a 0 NVT NVT a a 0 a 0 02-08-2010 Muthalib Islaah ( Qavaaidhu commityge report ah) _ 6 0 70 11 9 50 a a a 0 _ _ _ a a 0 0 _ 0 _ _ a 0 0 0 0 0 _ _ _ _ 02-08-2010 Tobacco bill faaskurumah 0 _ 6 0 70 16 15 39 0 a a a 0 _ _ 0 _ a a ______a 0 0 _ 0 0 _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 02-08-2010 vazeefa aa behey Qaanoonah islaah genaumuge Bill faaskurumah 4 0 72 4 12 56 0 _ _ 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 a _ 0 0 03-08-2010 broadcast Bill Faaskurumah 4 1 71 0 0 71 NVT a a a a 03-08-2010 Gasgahaagehi quarantine kurumabehey Bill balaigathumah a 3 1 71 1 0 70 _ NVT a a 04-08-2010 Vaigemagun dhathurufathurukuraa fasinjarunge Bill balaigathumah a 3 1 72 1 1 70 NVT a a 04-08-2010 Qaanoon asaasya tharuzuvaa Qaanoon thakaa gulhey Qaraaru_mariya proposal a 2 1 73 2 0 71 a NVT _ _ 10-08-2010 fandiyaarunge bill ah gennevi islaahaa eku committee nimmevei goiy faaskurun a 10 2 64 0 0 64 a a a a a NVT a NVT a a a 10-08-2010 fandiyaarunge Ganoon ah 1 vana islaah geneumuge Bill balaigathumah a 5 0 71 0 0 71 a a a a 10-08-2010 Fandiyaarunge Ganoon ah 1 vana islaah geneumuge Bill Faaskurumah a 5 0 71 0 0 71 a a a a 10-08-2010 Fandiyaarunge nantha faaskurun a a a a 28 0 48 0 0 48 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 10-08-2010 Fandiyaarunge Gaanoon ah 2 vana Islaah geneumuge Bill balaigathun a a 6 0 70 1 0 69 a a a a 12-08-2010 HRC mem_mariyam Azra Ahmed a a 5 3 68 0 10 58 0 a NVT NVT NVT 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 12-08-2010 HRC mem_Jeehaan Ahmed a a a a a 0 5 0 71 0 1 70 12-08-2010 HRC mem_Ahmed Tholaal a a a a _ _ _ a _ 5 0 71 37 1 33 _ _ _ _ 0 ______12-08-2010 HRC mem_Fathimath Nahid Shakir a _ a a _ _ _ a _ _ _ 4 0 72 36 1 35 _ 0 ______12-08-2010 HRC mem_Ahmed Saleem a _ a a _ _ _ a ______0 _ _ _ 4 0 72 38 33 _ 1 ______12-08-2010 HRC mem_Mariyam Shenin a _ a a _ _ _ a ______NVT NVT _ 4 2 70 41 29 _ 0 ______12-08-2010 HRC mem_Aishath Aaniya a _ a a _ _ _ a ______0 _ _ 4 0 72 36 33 _ 0 _ _ _ 3 0 ______12-08-2010 HRC mem_Mohamed Waheedh a a a a 4 0 72 0 72 0 12-08-2010 CSC mem_ Mohamed Latheef a a a a o 4 0 72 0 71 1 12-08-2010 CSC mem_ Mohamed fahmy Hassan a a a a NVT 4 1 71 0 71 0 12-08-2010 CSC mem_Ahmed Hassan Didi a a a a NVT 4 1 71 0 71 0 12-08-2010 CSC mem_Abdhulla Jihaadh a _ a a _ _ _ a _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ NVT NVT _ 4 2 70 36 31 _ 3 _ _ 0 ______0 _ 12-08-2010 CSC mem_Leena Mohamed Zahir a 0 0 0 a a _ _ a NVT _ _ _ _ 0 _ NVT 0 NVT NVT NVT NVT _ NVT _ _ 0 _ 0 0 _ 0 4 7 65 30 22 _ _ _ _ 13 _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ 0 0 ______0 _ 12-08-2010 CSC mem_Hussein Saeed Mohamed a 0 a a a _ _ a 0 _ _ _ 0 _ 0 _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ 0 _ 0 5 0 71 34 25 _ 0 0 _ _ _ _ 12 _ _ 0 _ _ 0 _ _ _ 0 ______12-08-2010 CSC mem_Ahmed ali didi a a a a a NVT 5 1 70 0 69 1 0 12-08-2010 CSC mem_hadheeja adam a a _ NVT 0 a NVT a 14 2 60 5 44 a 11 _ 0 a 0 _ 0 a a a a a 0 _ 0 _ 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a 16-08-2010 Civil Aviation authority Bill Balaigathumah a a 13 2 62 0 61 1 NVT 0 NVT a a a a a a a a a a a 16-08-2010 Safeerukamah-Adam Hassan a a a a a NVT NVT NVT a 12 5 59 1 57 1 NVT NVT a a a a a a 16-08-2010 Safeerukamah-Farhanaz Faisal a a a NVT a a NVT a 12 3 61 0 61 0 NVT a a a a a a 16-08-2010 Safeerukamah-Hussain Shihab a a a a a NVT a 12 2 62 0 62 0 NVT a a a a a a 16-08-2010 Safeerukamah-Ali Hussain didi a a NVT 12 2 62 0 61 1 NVT a a a a a a a a a a 16-08-2010 Safeerukamah-Iruthisham Adam a a NVT NVT a a 12 3 61 0 61 a 0 NVT a a a a a a a 16-08-2010 Safeerukamah-Ahmed Lathyf a a _ a a a _ _ _ a a 11 0 65 6 58 0 1 a _ a _ a a 19-08-2010 Jalsage vaguthu ithurukurumah NVT a a a a a NVT a 7 2 67 0 67 0 a 19-08-2010 Birudhehkumai, nurahkaatheri hathiyaarai thoonu ehchethi gengulhun manaakurumuge Bill Faaskurumah a a a a NVT NVT a 7 2 67 0 67 a 0 a 19-08-2010 Gang kuhthah manaakurumuge Bill Faaskurumah a a a NVT a NVT 6 3 67 0 66 1 NVT a a 23-08-2010 7 memberuge commity_rafeeq a a 4 NVT NVT NVT NVT 3 69 0 69 0 a 24-08-2010 CSC prez n Vice pres ayyanukurumah proporsal - Ali Azim a a 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 72 0 66 6 a 0 24-08-2010 Garaaru, Bill Faaskurumah a a a a a a NVT a 1 a 9 66 0 66 0 a 25-08-2010 TAX.A.T.MEM_Ibrahim Afeef a a a _ _ _ a ______a _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ a _ _ _ _ 8 68 35 32 1 a _ 0 ______a ______25-08-2010 TAX.A.T.MEM_Abdulla nisaamu a a a a a 0 a 8 68 0 68 0 a a 25-08-2010 TAX.A.T.MEM_Abdulsalaam Arif a a a _ _ _ a _ _ _ 0 NVT 0 0 a ______a 0 1 _ _ 0 _ a 8 67 36 24 _ 0 _ _ _ 7 _ _ _ _ _ a 0 ______25-08-2010 TAX.A.T.MEM_Ahmed Muaviyath Gasim a a a a 0 NVT a a 1 a 8 67 0 66 1 a 25-08-2010 TAX.A.T.MEM_Hassan Zuhair Mohamed a a a a a a 0 a 8 68 0 68 0 a 25-08-2010 TAX.A.T.MEM_Nasrulla Jameel a a a _ _ _ a _ 0 a ______a 8 68 35 33 0 _ _ _ _ a ______a ______25-08-2010 TAX.A.T.MEM_Ummukulsum Aboobakr a a _ _ a ______NVT _ _ a ______0 _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ a _ _ _ _ _ 6 69 53 14 2 ______a ______25-08-2010 Copyright Bill faaskurun a a a NVT NVT NVT NVT 0 a 4 _ a 6 66 3 62 1 _ _ a 25-08-2010 copy rights bill Faasnuvumun Commity ah anburaa fonuvumah a a a a 0 0 a a 8 68 0 67 1 a a 25-08-2010 TAX.A.T.MEM_Ahmed Saavi 0 a _ _ _ a _ NVT _ _ _ _ _ 1 a _ _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ 3 72 36 34 2 ______26-08-2010 maaliyathuge qanoon 1st islaahu genaumuge bill alun visnan majlihah fonuvi ethi commit- tee ah finuvaa Proporsal -Moosa Manik _ _ _ _ _ a _ NVT NVT 3 _ NVT a ______0 a _ 3 70 30 39 _ 1 ______26-08-2010 Proposal-Ali Azim Maaliyath Bill oiy gothah faaskuran a NVT 3 NVT NVT a 0 a 3 70 0 66 4 0 0 0 26-08-2010 Tourism ganoon ah islaah geneumuge Bill faaskurumah a NVT 3 NVT NVT a a 3 70 0 70 0 26-08-2010 GST-on tourism Bill faaskurumah a a a a a NVT a 1 a 11 64 0 64 0 a a a a 29-08-2010 HRC MEM_Ahmed Abdhulkareem a a a a a a a 0 a 11 65 0 65 0 a a a 29-08-2010 HRC MEM_DR.Ali Shameem a a _ _ a _ _ a _ NVT _ 0 a 0 a a _ _ 1 _ _ a _ _ _ _ _ 11 64 21 41 _ 2 a _ _ _ _ a a _ 29-08-2010 Idhaary dhaairaathah Laamarukazy..islaah genaumuge bill faaskurumah a NVT a a 1 a a a 8 67 0 67 0 a a 30-08-2010 Customs Bill balaigathumah March 2011 are valid asof affiliations NOTE: Party records parliamentary of voting asin NOTE: titles Afrashim Ali(0044) Hamid AbdulGafoor (0017) Mohamed Gasam(0079) Rozaina Adam(0055) Abdul MuhsinHameed(0066) Mohmed Nasheed-Kutti (0035) Moosa Manik(0015) Mohamed Aslam(0089) Mohamed Nashiz(0043) Ahmed Saleem(0049) Ismail AbdulHameed(0054) Ahmed Nazim(0063) Ali Saleem(0039) Mohamed Rasheed(0021) Ahmed Moosa(0053) Ahmed RasheedIbrahim (0072) Ilyas Labeeb(0086) Mohamed Rasheed(0090) Alhaan Fahmee (0087) Ahmed Hamza (0065) Mohamed Musthafa (0070) Ibrahim MohamedSolih(0051) Ali Riza (0037) Shifaq Mufeed (0084) Hassan Adil(0088) Abdulla Yaamin (0064) Abdul Gafoor Moosa(0034) Ilham Ahmed(0078) Mohamed Nasheed-carnal (0032) Mohamed Hussain(0030) Mariya AhmedDidi(0020) Imthiyaz Fahmee (0022) Ahmed Rasheed(0026) Ibrahim Muthalib(0081) Abdul RaheemAbdulla(0074) Ibrahim Rasheed(0024) Mohamed Mujthaz(0031) Hussain Waheed (0038) Ahmed Amir(0068) Ibrahim Riza (0056) Ahmed Mahloof(0019) Ali Waheed (0058) Mohamed Shifaz (0028) Abdulla MaseehMohamed(0085) Yoosuf Naeem(0061) Abdulla Abduraheem (0023) Hamdhoon AbdullaHameed(0046) Mohamed Riyaz (0077) Ali Arif(0033) Nazim Rashaad(0048) Abdulla Mausoom(0030) Hassan Latheef (0091) Ahmed Abdulla(0027) Hussain Mohamed(0057) Mohamed Rafeeq Hassan(0083) Ahmed Sameer(0029) Eva Abdulla(0018) Ali Mohamed(0042) Mohamed Nazim(0080) Qasim Ibrahim (0059) Ahmed Mohamed(0052) Zahir Adam(0082) Mohamed Zubair(0045) Mohamed Ramiz(0076) VOTE 0(NUETRAL) Ahmed Easa (0040) Visam Ali(0047) Abdul Azeez JamaalAbu-Bakuru (0075) Ali Azim(0016) Yoosuf AbdulGafoor (0073) Ahmed NihanHussainManik(0025) Ahmed ThasmeenAli(0050) Ruggiyya Mohamed(0060) Ahmed Siyaam Mohamed(0067) Riyaz Rasheed(0069) Moosa Zameer (0071) VOTE +(YES) Abdulla Shahid(speaker) Mohamed Thoriq(0041) VOTE -(NO) TOTAL VOTES NVT (ABSTAIN) ABSENT DRP MDP MDP DRP DRP IND MDP MDP DRP IND IND PA DRP MDP INDP PA MDP MDP MDP MDP MDP MDP MDP MDP MDP PA MDP DRP MDP DRP MDP MDP MDP JP PA MDP DRP MDP IND IND DRP DRP MDP DRP DRP DRP DRP MDP DRP MDP DRP DRP MDP DRP DRP MDP MDP DRP MDP JP DRP MDP IND DRP MDP DRP PA DRP PA DRP DRP MDP INDP DQP PA DRP MDP Party affilition a a a a a NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT a a a a _ _ a a 0 a 55 2 57 7 12 04-10-2010 Proposal_Mohamed Nasheedh a a a NVT a a NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT a a a a a a 1 a NVT 0 54 0 55 9 12 04-10-2010 HRC_Mariyam Azra Ahmed (raees kamah) _ a _ _ a _ NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT a _ a _ a a a _ _ a _ a ______a _ _ _ a _ 0 a _ _ _ a _ 22 32 54 9 13 04-10-2010 HRC_Jeehan Mahmoodh (naib raees kamah) 0 0 NVT _ 0 NVT 0 _ a a a a a 0 NVT a a a _ a a a 0 a 6 a _ 50 4 60 3 13 04-10-2010 islaahaaeku sharuee court thakuge Bill Faaskurumah a 0 NVT NVT NVT 0 a a a _ a a _ a a a 3 a 0 56 _ 4 63 3 10 05-10-2010 Rome Statute massala commityah a a NVT NVT a a a a 0 a a 1 a 64 0 65 2 9 06-10-2010 Copy Rights Bill Faaskurumah a a a NVT NVT a a a a a 0 a 65 0 65 2 9 06-10-2010 Jail n Perol Bill Balaigathumah a _ a _ a a a a a NVT _ _ a a a ______a a ______a ______a _ 0 ______26 35 61 1 14 11-10-2010 Dhoonyai Janavaaru dhivehiraahje ethereku Bill Balaigathun a NVT 0 a a a a 0 2 a 67 0 69 1 6 18-10-2010 proposal_Ahmed Sameer _ a _ 0 ______a _ _ a a _ _ a ______1 _ _ _ _ _ a 34 35 70 0 6 18-10-2010 Idhaaree dhaairaa laamarukazy usoolun hingumuge bill_Moosa manik a a a _ a a a a _ a a a a _ a _ _ a a a a _ a a a _ _ _ a _ _ a _ a a a a a _ _ a _ a 0 ______a a _ _ a _ 0 _ _ a a _ _ 2 _ _ _ _ _ a _ 3 a 36 41 0 35 22-11-2010 for Ministry of Home Affairs Mohamed Shihab a a a _ a a a a _ a a a a 0 a _ _ a a a a _ a a a _ _ _ a _ _ a _ a a a a a _ _ a _ a ______a a _ _ a _ _ _ _ a a _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ a _ 3 a 37 41 0 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Finance and Treasury Ali Hashim a a a a _ a a a a _ a a a a a _ _ a a a a _ a a a _ _ _ a _ _ a _ a a a a _ _ a _ a ______a a _ _ a _ _ _ _ a a _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ a _ 4 a 37 41 0 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ahmed Shaheed a a a a _ a a a a _ a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a _ a a a a _ a a _ 0 0 _ a a _ a 0 a a 5 0 _ a 28 a 8 41 0 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Health and Family Aminath Jameel a a a a _ a a a a _ _ _ _ _ a a a a a a a a a _ a a _ _ a _ a _ _ a _ a a a a _ _ a _ a ______a a _ _ a _ _ _ _ a a _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ a 3 a 38 41 0 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Defence and National Security Ameen Faisal a a a a _ a a a a _ _ _ a a a a a a a a a _ a a _ _ a _ a _ _ a _ a a a a _ _ a _ a ______a a _ _ a _ _ _ _ a a _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ a _ 4 a 37 41 0 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Education Musthafa Luthufy a NVT a a a _ a a a a _ _ a a a a a a a a a _ a a _ a 0 a _ _ a _ a a a a _ a a 0 _ 0 _ 0 _ a a 0 a NVT a a 0 _ 6 _ a _ 18 a 15 39 2 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Economic Development Mahmoodh Razi a a a _ a _ a a a a _ a a a a a a a a a _ a a _ a a 0 a _ a a a a a a _ 0 _ a a 0 a a a _ 3 _ _ a 27 a 11 41 0 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Human resources, Youth and Sports Hassan Lathyf a NVT a a _ a _ a a a a _ a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a _ a a a a a a _ _ a a a a a 1 _ a 32 a 7 40 1 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Housing and Environment Mohamed Aslam a a a _ _ a _ a a a a 0 _ _ _ a a a a a a a a a _ a a _ a _ a _ _ a _ a a a a _ _ a _ a ______a a _ _ a _ _ _ _ a a _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ a _ 3 a 37 41 0 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Fisheries and Agriculture Ibrahim didi a a a 0 a NVT a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a _ a a a a a a _ a a a a a 1 a 37 a 2 40 1 35 22-11-2010 Ministry of Islamic Affairs Abdulmajeedh Abdul-baari a a a _ a a a a a a _ _ NVT 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a _ a _ a a a ______a _ a ______a _ a a _ _ a _ a _ 0 _ _ 2 ______a 5 a 33 40 1 35 22-11-2010 Attorny General Ahmed Ali Sawadh a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a 40 a 1 41 0 35 22-11-2010 gaveshi aniyaa bill _rozaina adam a NVT a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a 40 a 0 40 1 35 22-11-2010 thauleem ge bill_jamaal aboobakuru a a a a a a a a 0 a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a _ a a a a a 3 a 0 37 a 1 41 0 35 22-11-2010 banking bill faaskurumah a NVT NVT a a a a a a _ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a 39 a 1 40 2 35 22-11-2010 Proposal_ali waheedh a a 40 a a a a a a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 1 a a 0 41 0 35 22-11-2010 Supreme court ge lafayakah ehumah Qaraaru 0 a 0 40 _ _ a _ _ _ a a a a _ _ _ a a _ a a _ _ a a _ a a a _ _ a a 2 a _ a 15 57 0 19 24-11-2010 gaanoon assaasy 1 vana islaah genaumuge bill faaskurumah 0 a 0 _ 25 0 _ a _ _ _ a a a a _ _ 0 a a _ _ a a _ _ _ _ a a _ a _ a _ _ _ a 0 _ _ _ _ a a _ 5 _ a _ _ _ a 27 57 0 19 24-11-2010 gaanoon assaasy islaah genaumuge bill commity ah fonuvumah NVT 0 0 a 0 50 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a _ a a 4 a _ 0 a 2 56 1 19 24-11-2010 halhuthaali bill balaigathumah a NVT NVT a a a a a 38 a a a a 0 a 0 a NVT a a 0 _ 0 _ a a a 0 NVT a NVT a a a 0 a 7 a 0 a 2 47 5 24 29-11-2010 Immigration Qanoon ah islaah geneumuge Bill balaigathumah NVT NVT a 0 a _ 56 a a a a _ a a a _ a a a 0 2 4 62 2 12 30-11-2010 Sarukaarah thakethi gathumaai hoadhumuge Bill balaigathumah _ a NVT _ _ 0 a _ a 0 51 _ _ a a 0 _ a _ a _ a _ _ 0 5 0 11 67 1 8 01-12-2010 accountgai faisaa nethicheque....bill balaigathumah ______a _ a _ _ _ 38 _ _ _ a a _ _ _ a _ a _ _ a ______0 1 _ _ 30 69 0 7 01-12-2010 kunfunyaa behey gannonah islaah...bill balaigathumah a _ _ _ _ _ a _ _ a _ _ _ _ _ a 35 _ _ _ _ a ______a ______a _ 0 _ _ 34 69 0 7 08-12-2010 Auditor.G­Ali Rasheed Umar a a _ NVT a _ _ _ a _ _ 0 a _ _ 36 _ a _ a _ a _ a _ _ _ _ _ a a a a _ _ _ _ _ a 0 2 _ 23 61 1 14 13-12-2010 Public etreprenuers comission -Riyaz rasheed Bill balaigathumah a a NVT NVT _ _ _ 0 0 a _ _ _ a _ _ 36 _ a _ a _ a _ a _ _ _ _ _ a a a a _ _ _ _ a 0 3 _ 22 61 2 13 13-12-2010 7 mem comitty ah fonuvumah_Riyaz rasheed a a NVT NVT NVT a 68 a 0 1 0 69 3 4 14-12-2010 Ijthimaaey rahkaatherikamuge bill balaigathumah ______a _ a _ a 0 ______a _ _ _ _ 32 _ _ a ______1 38 71 0 5 14-12-2010 Mohamed Nasheed proposalPublic Entreprenuership Bill to a 7 member committee a NVT _ 0 a a _ 0 0 _ 0 a 0 0 _ 58 _ a 0 7 5 70 1 5 14-12-2010 Mohamed Mujthaaz proposal (publc entrp) _ _ NVT _ NVT NVT a a a _ _ _ _ a _ 0 55 a 0 0 0 _ 4 9 68 3 5 14-12-2010 Ahmed Nazim proposal (2011 budget workings) _ NVT 0 _ 0 _ 62 0 0 0 _ 0 0 _ 8 0 5 75 1 0 28-12-2010 comity report faaskurumah NVT 74 a 0 0 74 1 1 28-12-2010 Tharujamaa ... Bill Faaskurumah ______39 ______0 _ 37 76 0 0 28-12-2010 Mahluf_Idhaaree dhaairaathah...Islaah Bill Faaskurumah _ 0 0 0 72 3 1 76 0 0 28-12-2010 Fandiyaarunge Islaah Bill Faaskurumah a 75 0 0 75 0 1 28-12-2010 Thalaseemia Bill Faaskurumah NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT NVT a 68 0 0 68 7 1 28-12-2010 Dhivehi bas himaayai kurumuge Bill Faaskurumah _ a 74 0 1 75 0 1 28-12-2010 University Bill Faaskurumah NVT _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ 0 0 0 _ _ _ 0 _ _ 0 0 0 _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ 44 _ _ _ 0 10 21 75 1 0 28-12-2010 Imthiyaz Bill Faaskurumah (Riyaz Rashed hushahellhi bill islaahaa eku) _ a 74 0 1 75 0 1 28-12-2010 Viyafaari Faidhaan Tax negumuge Bill Faaskurumah _ NVT a _ _ 0 69 _ 1 4 74 1 1 29-12-2010 2011 budget a 0 _ NVT NVT a a NVT a a a a a a 0 a a a 58 2 1 61 3 12 30-12-2010 Viyafaarige Faidhaan Tax negumuge Bill Faaskurumah March 2011 are valid asof affiliations NOTE: Party records parliamentary of voting asin NOTE: titles