Moving from Condemnation to Action

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Moving from Condemnation to Action Moving From Condemnation to Action The Case for the European Union to Impose Restrictive Measures on Serious Human Rights Abusers in the Maldives Prepared By: Jared Genser1 [email protected] +1 202 466 3069 26 February 2018 1 Jared Genser serves as international counsel to former Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed. In addition to being qualified to practice law in the United States, he is also a solicitor of England & Wales. Perseus Strategies would like to thank Elise Baranouski, C. Benjamin Brooks, Mary Brooks, Sarah Gledhill, Csaba Gondola, Julia Kuperminc, Juan Pablo Miramontes, Kate O’Sullivan, Samuel Ritholtz, Nicole Santiago, and Safia Sayed for their support. Table of Contents I.! Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 2! II.! Human Rights Abuses in the Maldives ........................................................................................................... 5! A.! Enforced Disappearances ........................................................................................................................... 5! B.! Arbitrary Arrest and Detention ................................................................................................................... 7! C.! Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment ........................................... 16! D.! The Death Penalty .................................................................................................................................... 21! E.! Restrictions on Fundamental Rights and Freedoms .................................................................................. 23! F. ! Culture of Impunity .................................................................................................................................. 30! G. ! Interference with Rule of Law in the Maldives ....................................................................................... 33! III.! Condemnation by the European Union and Member States ....................................................................... 39! IV.! Sanctions by the European Union ............................................................................................................... 43! A. ! Human Rights-Based Financial Sanctions .............................................................................................. 43! B. Process and Implementation of E.U. Sanctions ..................................................................................... 45! C. Relevant Examples ................................................................................................................................ 47! 1.! Belarus ................................................................................................................................................... 47! 2.! Burundi .................................................................................................................................................. 52! 3.! Venezuela .............................................................................................................................................. 53! 4.! Zimbabwe .............................................................................................................................................. 55! D.! Analogizing of Examples to the Maldives ............................................................................................... 57! 1.! The Maldives and Belarus ..................................................................................................................... 58! 2.! The Maldives and Burundi .................................................................................................................... 58! 3.! The Maldives and Venezuela ................................................................................................................ 59! 4.! The Maldives and Zimbabwe ................................................................................................................ 60! E.! Blueprint of Council Decision for the Maldives ....................................................................................... 61! Conclusion: Call for Action .................................................................................................................................. 62! ANNEX – MODEL OF POTENTIAL COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION DECISION ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES ............................................................................................................................... 63! 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Maldives, a nation that comprises nearly 1,200 small islands2 in the middle of the Indian Ocean well-known for its white sand beaches and beautiful blue seas, is in turmoil under President Abdulla Yameen and his repressive regime. Officials from the European Union (E.U.) have publicly criticized Yameen’s government and its widespread human rights abuses, but further action is required, as Yameen remains intransigent even in the face of global condemnation. This report recommends the Council of the European Union adopt a Council decision and regulation imposing human rights-based sanctions in response to the crisis in the Maldives, including targeted asset freezes and travel bans, for those implicated in major human rights abuses in the Maldives. The Maldives has long been one of Asia’s poorest nations, and was ranked 105 out of 188 countries on the Human Development Index in 2015, as published by the United Nations Development Programme.3 But poverty is far from the only concern for the more than 390,000 people4 who reside in the Maldives. In 2008, the country held its first democratic elections, in which Mohamed Nasheed, a longtime champion of human rights, defeated President Maumoon Gayoom, ending his 30-years in office. Unfortunately, the respite was short-lived, as President Nasheed was pushed out of office in a coup in 2012. In a subsequent election marred by numerous irregularities and interference by the Maldivian Supreme Court, former President Gayoom’s half-brother Abdulla Yameen ultimately prevailed over President Nasheed. Yameen remains in power today. The past four years under Yameen’s rule have been marked by an increasingly broad range of human rights abuses, including arbitrary arrest and detention, torture, enforced disappearance, harassment, and intimidation of human rights defenders, dissidents, and others critical of the regime.5 The political opposition and civil society groups face an environment of perpetual fear.6 Yameen and his allies are able to perpetuate their widespread assault on liberty and security, unfettered by domestic law in light of Yameen’s interference in and control over the legislature and judiciary, which has resulted in impunity for human rights abusers who align themselves with Yameen.7 Over the past two weeks, the situation has rapidly escalated, necessitating urgent action. On 1 February 2018, in a dramatic reversal of its previous support facilitating Yameen’s repression, the Supreme Court of the Maldives issued a decision that ordered the 2 Maldives, THE WORLD FACTBOOK, last update Jan. 3, 2018, available at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mv.html [hereinafter Maldives World Factbook]. 3 Human Development Report 2015, UN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2015, available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/HDI. 4 Maldives World Factbook, supra note 2. 5 Maldives: State of Emergency an Alarming Development in Continuing Crackdown on Human Rights, AMNESTY INT’L, Nov. 4, 2015, available at http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/press-releases/maldives-state-of- emergency-an-alarming-development-in-continuing-crackdown-on-human-rights. 6 Amnesty Says Human Rights in Maldives Deteriorating, AL JAZEERA, Apr. 23, 2015, available at http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/04/amnesty-human-rights-maldives-deteriorating-150423141730292.html. 7 Ahmed Naish, President Warns Maldivians to Be Wary of ‘Traitorous Plotters’, MALDIVES INDEPENDENT, Nov. 3, 2015, available at http://maldivesindependent.com/politics/president-warns-maldivians-to-be-wary-of- traitorous-plotters-119298. 2 reversal of the convictions of nine political prisoners, including Nasheed, and the reinstatement of 12 Members of Parliament who had previously been declared by the Maldives Election Commission as stripped of their seats for having tried to join the opposition.8 In response, Attorney General Mohamed Anil, Chief of Defense General Ahmed Shiyam, and Commissioner of Police Abdulla Nawaz added that if the Supreme Court declared Yameen removed from office they would advice the military and police not to enforce such an order.9 Two of the 12 MPs, Abdulla Sinan and Ilham Ahmed, were arrested after flying back to the Maldives after months in exile.10 In addition, the police announced they were investigating the Chief Justice and another Justice of the Supreme Court on allegations of bribery.11 Furthermore, on 5 February Yameen announced a state of emergency for 15 days,12 effectively declaring de facto martial law.13 The state security forces have assumed extraordinary powers and are being used to intimidate remaining justices on the Supreme Court bench. Within hours of the declaration of a state of emergency, two justices of the Supreme Court, the chief judicial administrator, and former president Maumoon Abdul Gayoom (1978–2008) were arrested and taken into police custody.14 On 6
Recommended publications
  • Maldives 2013 International Religious Freedom Report
    MALDIVES 2013 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution and other laws and policies restrict religious freedom and, in practice, the government enforced these restrictions. Restrictions were not enforced for foreign tourists on “uninhabited” resort islands. The government’s respect for religious freedom declined during the year. The law prohibits citizens’ practice of any religion other than Sunni Islam and requires the government to exert control over all religious matters, including the practice of Islam. The authorities did not recognize or respect freedom of religion and it remained severely restricted. There were reports of governmental detention, religious intolerance, and restriction of religious freedom. Governmental pressure to conform to a stricter interpretation of Islamic practice increased, particularly in the lead-up to presidential elections. The government used religious grounds to further constrain the space of free expression in the media. Some Muslims expressed concern about increasing “Islamic radicalism,” though advocates of religious freedom generally believed the public was becoming more aware of the issue. There were reports of societal abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice, including incidents against Maldivians who did not want to conform to a strict, conservative interpretation of Islam. There was an increasing trend among political leaders to call for greater limits on religious groups and activities, and impose criminal punishments in accordance with Islamic law. The use of religion in political rhetoric increased substantially, which led to derogatory statements about Christianity and Judaism and harassment of citizens calling for a more tolerant interpretation of Islam. Anti-Semitic rhetoric among conservative parties continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism in the United States Report of an Expert Consultation
    Antisemitism in the United States Report of an Expert Consultation Organized by AJC’s Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights in Cooperation with UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Dr. Ahmed Shaheed 10-11 April 2019, New York City Introduction On March 5, 2019, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, announced that he was preparing a thematic report on global antisemitism to be presented to the UN General Assembly in New York in the fall of 2019. The Special Rapporteur requested that the Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights (JBI) organize a consultation that would provide him with information about antisemitism in the United States as he carried out his broader research. In response, JBI organized a two-day expert consultation on Wednesday, April 10 and Thursday, April 11, 2019 at AJC’s Headquarters in New York. Participants discussed how antisemitism is manifested in the U.S., statistics and trends concerning antisemitic hate crimes, and government and civil society responses to the problem. This event followed an earlier consultation in Geneva, Switzerland convened by JBI for Dr. Shaheed in June 2018 on global efforts to monitor and combat antisemitism and engaging the United Nations human rights system to address this problem.1 I. Event on April 10, 2019: Antisemitism in the United States: An Overview On April 10, several distinguished historians and experts offered their perspectives on antisemitism in the United States. In addition to the Special Rapporteur, Professor Deborah Lipstadt (Emory University), Professor Jonathan Sarna (Brandeis University), Professor Rebecca Kobrin (Columbia University), Rabbi David Saperstein (former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon Assembly Ratifies State of Emergency After Deadly Blast
    04 Friday, August 14, 2020 World NEWS Duterte to skip Philippine trial of Russia virus vaccine IN BRIEF AFP very first jab, expressing “huge Drug Administration is ex- offering “sustainable immu- the science and technology 33 dead in MANILA trust” in the vaccine, despite pected to approve the vaccine nity” against the coronavirus department met with Gama- growing scepticism about its -- developed by the Gamaleya and is in the final stage of tests leya on Wednesday to discuss Niger floods THE Philippines will begin effectiveness. research institute and the Rus- involving 2,000 people. the protocols for the trial of ABIDJAN Thirty-three peo- large-scale human testing of But his spokesman Harry sian defence ministry -- in Roque said Philippine ex- the vaccine, which is dubbed ple in Niger have died and Russia’s coronavirus vaccine Roque said the president was April. perts will review next month “Sputnik V” after the pioneer- more than 80,000 have in October, but President Rod- scheduled to receive the vac- “May 1 is when the PSG the results of Russia’s Phase 1 ing Soviet satellite of the 1950s. been affected by floods rigo Duterte will not receive cine no earlier than May 1 (presidential security group) and 2 clinical trials before the caused by heavy rains, the the inoculation until regula- -- weeks after the Russian- may allow him, once all requi- Southeast Asian country starts The Philippines has logged country’s emergency ser- tors guarantee its safety, his funded Phase 3 clinical trial in site tests have been finished,” its Phase 3 testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Report
    International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission to the Maldives A Vibrant Media Under Pressure: An Independent Assessment of Press Freedom in the Maldives July 2006 Contributing Organisations: Article XIX Reporters without Borders (RSF) International Media Support (IMS) International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) South Asia Press Commission (SAPC) The findings in this report are based on a joint assessment mission to the Maldives in May 2006 19 July 2006 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 2. Background and Media Landscape 3. Intimidation and Harassment 4. House Arrest and Detention 5. Media Law Reforms 6. Recommendations Acroymns and Terminology AP Justice Party/ Adaalath Party Dhivehi Official language of the Maldives DRP Dhivehi Raiyyethunge Party (Maldivian Peoples Party) HRCM Human Rights Commission of the Maldives IDP Islamic Democratic Party Majlis Parliament/ Assembly MDP Maldivian Democratic Party MNDF Maldivian National Defence Force MP Member of Parliament NSS National Security Service of the Maldives SAARC South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation Special Majlis Constitutional Parliament/ Assembly UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNHCHR United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights This report is being made publicly available in the interests of sharing information and enhancing coordination amongst freedom of expression, press freedom and media support actors. All information presented in this report is based on interviews and written contributions provided to the mission members during April and May 2006 and should be independently rechecked by any party seeking to use it as a basis for comment or action. The mission team welcomes all feedback and suggestions from organisations or individuals about the report, which can be sent to the participating organisations (please see contact details at the end of the report).
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ahmed Shaheed*,**
    A/HRC/28/70 Advance Unedited Version Distr.: General 12 March 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty-eighth session Agenda item 4 Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ahmed Shaheed*,** Summary In the present report, the fourth to be submitted to the Human Rights Council pursuant to Council resolution 25/24, the Special Rapporteur highlights developments in the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran since his fourth interim report submitted to the General Assembly (A/68/503) in October 2013. The report examines ongoing concerns and emerging developments in the State’s human rights situation. Although the report is not exhaustive, it provides a picture of the prevailing situation as observed in the reports submitted to and examined by the Special Rapporteur. In particular, and in view of the forthcoming adoption of the second Universal Periodic Review of the Islamic Republic of Iran, it analysis these in light of the recommendations made during the UPR process. * Late submission. ** The annexes to the present report are circulated as received, in the language of submission only. GE.15- A/HRC/28/70 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1-5 3 II. Methodology ........................................................................................................... 6-7 4 III. Cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • May 27, 2020 Submission from B'nai B'rith International to Dr
    May 27, 2020 Submission from B’nai B’rith International to Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, for inclusion in the report to the General Assembly on religious discrimination: B’nai B’rith International is the world’s oldest Jewish humanitarian, advocacy and social action organization, with a grassroots presence around the world. B’nai B’rith has been active at the UN since the founding of the world body in San Francisco in 1945. The organization has had ECOSOC accreditation since 1947 as lead agency of the Coordinating Board of Jewish Organizations (CBJO), and has an engaged presence in New York at UN Headquarters, Geneva at the Human Rights Council and Paris at UNESCO, amongst other UN duty stations. We are pleased to offer the following submission on issues facing the global Jewish community for the upcoming report of the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief. Iran’s policies are of profoundly grave concern. The country, which is led by a radical clerical regime bent on the destruction of Israel, has within its borders a remnant Jewish population. Iranian Jewish history goes back to the time of King Cyrus in the 6th century BCE, but sadly the great majority of this Jewish community has been forced to leave Iran in modern times. Most Persian Jews fled to Israel or the United States. Those that remain live under a regime that openly uses genocidal rhetoric towards Israel, the nation-state of the Jewish people, often employing anti-Semitic tropes. The regime engages repeatedly, and appallingly, in Holocaust denial or trivialization.
    [Show full text]
  • Maldives 2019 Human Rights Report
    MALDIVES 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Republic of Maldives is a multiparty constitutional democracy. In September 2018 voters elected Ibrahim Mohamed Solih president. Observers considered the election mostly free and fair despite a flawed pre-election process, which was overseen by the former administration. Parliamentary elections held on April 6 were well administered and transparent according to local and international observers. Maldives Police Service (MPS) is responsible for internal security and reports to the Ministry of Home Affairs. Maldives National Defence Force (MNDF) is responsible for external security and disaster relief and reports to the Ministry of Defence. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Significant human rights issues included: allegations of torture by government authorities; significant problems with the independence of the judiciary; trafficking in persons; criminalization of same-sex sexual conduct; and the lack of a legal framework recognizing independent trade unions. The government took some steps to investigate officials who committed human rights abuses, including enforced disappearances, and established investigative commissions. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings There were no reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. b. Disappearance There were no reports of disappearances by or on behalf of government authorities. The government took steps to investigate disappearances reported in previous years. MALDIVES 2 On September 1, the Presidential Commission on Deaths and Disappearances shared preliminary results from its investigation into the 2014 disappearance of reporter Ahmed Rilwan, noting that evidence indicated Rilwan was killed on a vessel at sea following his abduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects and Basic Choices of the CFSP (Part II, Point E, Paragraph 25
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 July 2014 (OR. en) 12094/14 PESC 793 COPS 191 FIN 503 PE 309 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: General Secretariat of the Council On: 22 July 2014 To: Delegations No. prev. doc.: 11221/14 PESC 672 COPS 159 Subject: Main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP (Part II, point E, paragraph 25 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013) – 2013 – Annual report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament Delegations will find enclosed "Main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP (Part II, point E, paragraph 25 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013) – 2013 – Annual report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament", as endorsed by the Council on 22 July 2014. 12094/14 MF/fh 1 DG C 1 EN MAIN ASPECTS AND BASIC CHOICES OF THE CFSP (PART II, POINT E, PARAGRAPH 25 OF THE INTERINSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT OF 2 DECEMBER 2013) - 2013 PART I: LOOKING BACK AT 2013 ............................................................................. 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6 1. Examples ............................................................................................. 8 2. Global issues ..................................................................................... 13 3. Strategic partners ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Offering New Investment Opportunities Across the Board
    GLOBAL INSIGHT MALDIVES THE MALDIVES Offering new investment opportunities across the board Future Outlook: Sunny As one of the world’s most sought-after holiday destinations, the Maldives has bounced back from the tsunami disaster to outperform all fi nancial predictions, and is looking to double its tourism capacity by 2010. With its private resorts, coral solutions. “Having celebrated 40 key sectors, fi shing and tourism, Qasim Ibrahim, Mahamood reefs and white-sand beaches, years of diplomatic relations last cannot be underestimated.” Minister of Finance Shougee, the Maldives can lay easy claim year, Japan and the Maldives On the verge of graduating & Treasury Minister of Tourism to being the last word in para- continue to forge strong ties from Less Developed Country & Civil Aviation dise. Last year, tourist arrivals and it continues to be one of our to Middle-Income status, the hit record levels with new resort most important development Maldives is seeing growth in developments swelling the partners,” says Qasim Ibrahim, international trade at between Industry notes: “Most people are Abdulla Mausoom of the economy by 18 percent. minister of fi nance. “There is 10 percent and 15 percent, while looking for private islands with Maldives Tourism Promotion To keep up with demand, the good feeling and a strong friend- an open economy makes it an personal space. They have a love Board notes how the Japanese government is continuing to look ship with the Japanese, and their attractive place to invest, as well of beauty and nature. Other seg- are the country’s fi fth most to Japanese investors for win-win role in terms of investment in our as relax, in.
    [Show full text]
  • 136 IPU Assembly Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians
    136th IPU Assembly Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1- 5 April 2017 Governing Council CL/200/11(b)-R.2 Item 11(b) Dhaka, 5 April 2017 Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians Report on the mission to the Maldives 10 - 12 October 2016 MLD/16 - Mariya Didi* MLD/45 - Ahmed Sameer MLD/28 - Ahmed Easa MLD/46 - Afrasheem Ali MLD/29 - Eva Abdulla* MLD/48 - Ali Azim* MLD/30 - Moosa Manik* MLD/49 - Alhan Fahmy MLD/31 - Ibrahim Rasheed MLD/50 - Abdulla Shahid* MLD/32 - Mohamed Shifaz MLD/51 - Rozeina Adam* MLD/33 - Imthiyaz Fahmy* MLD/52 - Ibrahim Mohamed Solih MLD/34 - Mohamed Gasam MLD/53 - Mohamed Nashiz MLD/35 - Ahmed Rasheed MLD/54 - Ibrahim Shareef* MLD/36 - Mohamed Rasheed MLD/55 - Ahmed Mahloof* MLD/37 - Ali Riza MLD/56 - Fayyaz Ismail* MLD/39 - Ilyas Labeeb MLD/57 - Mohamed Rasheed Hussain* MLD/40 - Rugiyya Mohamed MLD/58 - Ali Nizar* MLD/41 - Mohamed Thoriq MLD/59 - Mohamed Falah* MLD/42 - Mohamed Aslam* MLD/60 - Abdulla Riyaz* MLD/43 - Mohammed Rasheed* MLD/61 - Ali Hussain* MLD/44 - Ali Waheed Executive summary The case before the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians was initiated after the arrest and brief detention of several members of the People’s Majlis in February 2012. They were detained during demonstrations in the course of which the police used excessive force. However, the case has since evolved to include: other instances of alleged arbitrary arrest and detention; alleged frivolous legal proceedings against parliamentarians; and threats and acts of violence against parliamentarians, including the murder of Mr. Afrasheem Ali and the stabbing of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • John Turner Commonwealth Secretariat
    Report following a review of the Maldives’ electoral laws, regulations and other related legislation, procedures and administrative mechanisms John Turner Commonwealth Electoral Adviser November/December 2004 Commonwealth Secretariat Ref: JWT/Report on election - 1 - Contents Part Subject Page 1 Executive Summary 3 2 Background 4 3 Constitutional and Electoral Arrangements 4 in the Maldives 4 Scope of the Assignment 5 5 Methodology 7 6 Field visit to Haa Alifu and Haa Dhaalu atolls 7 7 General Principles relating to Electoral 10 arrangements 8 The administration of elections 10 9 Transparency and voter confidence 20 10 Hearing of complaints - campaigning and 22 the voting process 11 Controls to avoid corruption and the role of 23 money in the electoral process 12 Voter education 25 13 Effective campaigning 26 14 Control of political parties 27 15 Proportionate representation 29 16 Local governance 30 17 Strategic Plan 31 List of Appendices 31 Appendix 1A - Terms of Reference 33 Appendix 1B - Terms of Reference - Revised 34 Appendix 2 - Schedule of engagements 35 Appendix 3 - List of Reference Materials 38 Appendix 4 - Constituency electorates 39 Appendix 5 - Summary of Recommendations from 40 NDI Report Appendix 6 - Strategic Plan 44 Ref: JWT/Report on election - 2 - REPORT OF JOHN TURNER, COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL ADVISER REPUBLIC OF MALDIVES NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2004 1. Executive Summary 1.1 This report has been prepared as a result of an assessment visit and review of the legal framework for elections in the Republic of Maldives. It has been prepared against the backdrop of constitutional and other reforms proposed by the President, His Excellency Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Status of the Human Right to Freedom of Religion Or Belief
    Submission by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade i CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION...................................................................................6 DFAT’s Submission .........................................................................................................................................7 Australia’s Approach to Human Rights ..........................................................................................................7 DFAT’s Approach to the Freedom of Religion or Belief .................................................................................8 International Human Rights Law on Freedom of Religion or Belief...............................................................9 The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) .................................................................9 Other Binding Obligations ..........................................................................................................................10 Non-binding Sources of the Freedom of Religion or Belief ........................................................................10 Implementation of Human Rights Law on Freedom of Religion and Belief................................................10 CHAPTER 2: MULTILATERAL ADVOCACY AND ENGAGEMENT – THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM.......................................................................13 The Universal Periodic Review (UPR)...........................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]