Why a New Protected Area in Amazonian Peru?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why a New Protected Area in Amazonian Peru? eNgLISH CoNTENTS (for Color Plates, see pages 25– 48) Participants ............................................................................ 156 appendices Water.Samples.(1).................................................................... 274 Institutional Profiles ............................................................... 159 Vascular.Plants.(2)................................................................... 278 acknowledgments ................................................................... 162 Fish.Sampling.Stations.(3)........................................................ 308 ................................................................................ Mission and approach ............................................................ 166 Fishes.(4). 310 Amphibians.and.Reptiles.(5).................................................... 330 report at a glance .................................................................. 167 Birds.(6).................................................................................. 336 Why Yaguas-Cotuhé? ............................................................... 175 Large.and.Medium-sized.Mammals.(7).................................... 356 Bats.(8).................................................................................... 360 Why a New Protected area in amazonian Peru? ...................... 176 Commonly.Used.Plants.(9)...................................................... 362 Conservation in Yaguas-Cotuhé ............................................... 178 Commonly.Hunted.or.Sold.Animals.(10)................................. 366 Conservation.Targets............................................................... 178 Threats.................................................................................... 184 Literature Cited ...................................................................... 369 ..................................................................................... Assets. 186 Published reports .................................................................. 378 Recommendations................................................................... 188 technical report ..................................................................... 192 Regional.Panorama.and.Sites.Visited........................................ 192 Biological Inventory . Landscape.Processes:.Geology,.Hydrology,.and.Soils............ 199 . Flora.and.Vegetation............................................................ 211 . Fishes.................................................................................. 221 . Amphibians.and.Reptiles..................................................... 230 . Birds.................................................................................... 237 . Mammals............................................................................ 245 Social Inventory Communities.Visited:.Social.and.Cultural.Assets. and.Resource.Use............................................................. 252 Perú: Yaguas-Cotuhé junio / june 2011 155 PARTICIPaNTS FIELD TEAM Diana (tita) Alvira Reyes (social inventory) Jorge Gallardo (Iquitos logistics) Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. Instituto.del.Bien.Común The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA Iquitos,.Peru [email protected] [email protected] gonzalo Bullard (field logistics) roosevelt García Villacorta (plants) Independent.consultant. Peruvian.Center.for.Biodiversity.and.Conservation Lima,.Peru. Iquitos,.Peru [email protected] [email protected] andrea Campos Chu (Iquitos logistics) Julio Grández (field logistics) Instituto.del.Bien.Común Universidad.Nacional.de.la.Amazonía.Peruana Iquitos,.Peru Iquitos,.Peru [email protected] [email protected] Zaleth Cordero-P. (plants) Max H. Hidalgo (fishes) Herbario.Amazónico.Colombiano.(COAH) Museo.de.Historia.Natural. Instituto.Amazónico.de.Investigaciones.Científicas.(SINCHI) Universidad.Nacional.Mayor.de.San.Marcos Bogotá,.Colombia Lima,.Peru [email protected] [email protected] Álvaro del Campo (field logistics, photography, video) Isau Huamantupa (plants) Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. Herbario.Vargas.(CUZ) The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA Universidad.Nacional.San.Antonio.de.Abad [email protected] Cusco,.Peru [email protected] Juan Díaz Alván (birds) Instituto.de.Investigaciones.de.la.Amazonía.Peruana.(IIAP) Dario Hurtado (coordination, transportation logistics) Iquitos,.Peru Peruvian.National.Police. [email protected] Lima,.Peru Freddy Ferreyra (Iquitos logistics) guillermo Knell (field logistics) Instituto.del.Bien.Común Ecologística.Perú Iquitos,.Peru Lima,.Peru [email protected] [email protected] www.ecologisticaperu.com robin B. Foster (plants) Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA [email protected] 156 RAPID BIoLOGICaL AND SOCIaL INVeNTORIES inFoRMe /RePoRT NO. 23 Jonathan A. Markel (cartography) Mario Pariona (social inventory) Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA [email protected] [email protected] Italo Mesones (field logistics) ricardo Pinedo Marín (social inventory) Universidad.Nacional.de.la.Amazonía.Peruana Proyecto.Especial.Binacional.Desarrollo.Integral.. Iquitos,.Peru . de.la.Cuenca.del.Río.Putumayo.(PEDICP) [email protected] Iquitos,.Peru [email protected] olga Montenegro (mammals) Instituto.de.Ciencias.Naturales Nigel Pitman (plants) Universidad.Nacional.de.Colombia Center.for.Tropical.Conservation Bogotá,.Colombia Nicholas.School.of.the.Environment [email protected] Duke.University,.Durham,.NC,.USA [email protected] Debra K. Moskovits (coordination, birds) Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. Manuel Ramírez Santana (social inventory) The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA Organización.Regional.de.los.Pueblos.Indígenas.. [email protected] . del.Oriente.(ORPIO) Iquitos,.Peru Luis Alberto Moya Ibáñez (mammals) [email protected] Proyecto.Especial.Binacional.Desarrollo.Integral.. de.la.Cuenca.del.Río.Putumayo.(PEDICP) ana Rosa Sáenz Rodríguez (social inventory) Iquitos,.Peru Instituto.del.Bien.Común [email protected] Iquitos,.Peru [email protected] Jonh Jairo Mueses-Cisneros (amphibians and reptiles) Corporación.para.el.Desarrollo.Sostenible.del.. richard Chase Smith (coordination) . Sur.de.la.Amazonía.(CORPOAMAZONIA) Instituto.del.Bien.Común Mocoa,.Colombia Lima,.Peru [email protected] [email protected] armando Ortega-Lara (fishes) robert F. Stallard (geology) Fundación.para.la.Investigación.y.el.. Smithsonian.Tropical.Research.Institute Desarrollo.Sostenible.(FUNINDES) Panama.City,.Panama Cali,.Colombia [email protected] [email protected] Perú: Yaguas-Cotuhé junio / june 2011 157 Participants (continued) COLLABORATORS Douglas F. Stotz (birds) Comunidad Nativa de Huapapa Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. Putumayo.River,.Loreto,.Peru The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA [email protected] Comunidad Nativa de Puerto Franco Putumayo.River,.Loreto,.Peru aldo Villanueva (field logistics) Ecologística.Perú Comunidad Nativa de Santa Rosa de Cauchillo Lima,.Peru Yaguas.River,.Loreto,.Peru [email protected] www.ecologisticaperu.com Federación de Comunidades Indígenas del Bajo Putumayo (FeCoIBaP) rudolf von May (amphibians and reptiles) Putumayo.River,.Loreto,.Peru Florida.International.University Miami,.FL,.USA Peruvian National Police [email protected] Centro de Conservación, Investigación y Manejo Corine Vriesendorp (coordination, plants) de Áreas Naturales (CIMa-Cordillera Azul) Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. Lima,.Peru The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA [email protected] Dirección General de Flora y Fauna Silvestre Ministry of Agriculture tyana Wachter (general logistics) Lima,.Peru Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation. The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas (sINChI) [email protected] Bogotá,.Colombia Alaka Wali (social inventory advisor) smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) Environment,.Culture,.and.Conservation Panama.City,.Panama The.Field.Museum,.Chicago,.IL,.USA [email protected] Peruvian Center for Biodiversity and Conservation Iquitos,.Peru Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá,.Colombia 158 RAPID BIoLOGICaL AND SOCIaL INVeNTORIES inFoRMe /RePoRT NO. 23 INSTITUTIoNaL PROFILES the Field Museum Instituto del Bien Común (IBC) The.Field.Museum.is.a.collections-based.research.and.. The.Instituto.del.Bien.Común.is.a.Peruvian.non-profit.organization. educational.institution.devoted.to.natural.and.cultural.diversity.. devoted.to.promoting.the.best.use.of.shared.resources..Sharing. Combining.the.fields.of.Anthropology,.Botany,.Geology,.Zoology,.. resources.is.the.key.to.our.common.well-being.today.and,.in.the. and.Conservation.Biology,.museum.scientists.research.issues.in. future,.as.a.people.and.as.a.country;.to.the.well-being.of.the.large. evolution,.environmental.biology,.and.cultural.anthropology... number.of.Peruvians.who.live.in.rural.areas,.in.forests.and,.on. One.division.of.the.Museum.—.Environment,.Culture,.and. the.coasts;.to.the.long-term.health.of.the.natural.resources.that. Conservation.(ECCo)— is.dedicated.to.translating.science.into. sustain.us;.and.to.the.sustainability.and.quality.of.urban.life.at. action.that.creates.and.supports.lasting.conservation.of.biological. all.social.levels..Among.the.projects.led.by.IBC.are.Pro.Pachitea,.
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Relationships and Generic Placement of Dryaderces Inframaculata Boulenger, 1882 (Anura: Hylidae)
    70 (3): 357 – 366 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2020. 2020 Molecular phylogenetic relationships and generic placement of Dryaderces inframaculata Boulenger, 1882 (Anura: Hylidae) Diego A. Ortiz 1, 4, *, Leandro J.C.L. Moraes 2, 3, *, Dante Pavan 3 & Fernanda P. Werneck 2 1 College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia — 2 Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Programa de Coleções Científicas Biológicas, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus, AM, Brazil — 3 Ecosfera Consultoria e Pes- quisa em Meio Ambiente Ltda., São Paulo, SP, Brazil — 4 Corresponding author; email: [email protected] — * These authors con- tributed equally to this work Submitted January 4, 2020. Accepted July 9, 2020. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/vertebrate-zoology on July 31, 2020. Published in print Q3/2020. Editor in charge: Raffael Ernst Abstract Dryaderces inframaculata Boulenger, 1882, is a rare species known only from a few specimens and localities in the southeastern Amazonia rainforest. It was originally described in the genus Hyla, after ~ 130 years transferred to Osteocephalus, and more recently to Dryaderces. These taxonomic changes were based solely on the similarity of morphological characters. Herein, we investigate the phylogenetic re­ lationships and generic placement of D. inframaculata using molecular data from a collected specimen from the middle Tapajós River region, state of Pará, Brazil. Two mitochondrial DNA fragments (16S and COI) were assessed among representative species in the sub­ family Lophiohylinae (Anura: Hylidae) to reconstruct phylogenetic trees under Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood criteria. Our results corroborate the monophyly of Dryaderces and the generic placement of D. inframaculata with high support.
    [Show full text]
  • LARVAL FORMS in ECHINODERMATA in Echinoderms
    LARVAL FORMS IN ECHINODERMATA In echinoderms eggs and sperms are released in water and fertilization takes place in water forming zygote. Echinoderms are deuterostomes and hence cleavage is radial, holoblastic and indeterminate. The larvae hatch in water and feed and grow through successive larval stages to become adults. The larvae of echinoderms are bilaterally symmetrical but lose symmetry during metamorphosis. Different classes of echinoderms show structurally different larval stages and their comparisons can reveal their evolutionary ancestry. LARVAE OF ASTEROIDEA There are three larval stages in Asteroidea in the course of their development to adult stage. Early bipinnaria appears like hypothetical dipleurula. It has oval body without arms and ciliary bands for locomotion. It has well developed alimentary canal for feeding and grows to become bipinnaria. Bipinnaria larva possesses 5 pairs of ciliated arms which do not have any skeletal support inside. These arms are used for swimming in water while feeding on planktons. Preoral and postoral ciliary bands are also present. This larva resembles auricularia larva of Holothuroidea in general appearance. Brachiolaria larva is formed after 6-7 weeks of life and growth of bipinnaria. This larva is sedentary and remains attached to a hard substratum for which it possesses three brachiolarian arms having adhesive discs at the tip. Ciliated arms get reduced and become thin and functionless, while mouth, anus and gut are well developed. It has axocoel, hydocoel and somatocoel that later on give rise to water vascular system Development of starfish takes place inside the sedentary brachiolaria which ruptures and releases tiny starfish into water. LARVAE OF HOLOTHUROIDEA Class Holothuroidea demonstrate two larval stages, namely, auricularia and doliolaria larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Alive: a Decade of Discoveries 1999-2009
    Amazon Alive! A decade of discovery 1999-2009 The Amazon is the planet’s largest rainforest and river basin. It supports countless thousands of species, as well as 30 million people. © Brent Stirton / Getty Images / WWF-UK © Brent Stirton / Getty Images The Amazon is the largest rainforest on Earth. It’s famed for its unrivalled biological diversity, with wildlife that includes jaguars, river dolphins, manatees, giant otters, capybaras, harpy eagles, anacondas and piranhas. The many unique habitats in this globally significant region conceal a wealth of hidden species, which scientists continue to discover at an incredible rate. Between 1999 and 2009, at least 1,200 new species of plants and vertebrates have been discovered in the Amazon biome (see page 6 for a map showing the extent of the region that this spans). The new species include 637 plants, 257 fish, 216 amphibians, 55 reptiles, 16 birds and 39 mammals. In addition, thousands of new invertebrate species have been uncovered. Owing to the sheer number of the latter, these are not covered in detail by this report. This report has tried to be comprehensive in its listing of new plants and vertebrates described from the Amazon biome in the last decade. But for the largest groups of life on Earth, such as invertebrates, such lists do not exist – so the number of new species presented here is no doubt an underestimate. Cover image: Ranitomeya benedicta, new poison frog species © Evan Twomey amazon alive! i a decade of discovery 1999-2009 1 Ahmed Djoghlaf, Executive Secretary, Foreword Convention on Biological Diversity The vital importance of the Amazon rainforest is very basic work on the natural history of the well known.
    [Show full text]
  • Biologia De Anuros Biology of Anurans 26 (Sapos, Rãs, Jias E Pererecas) (Frogs, Toads and Treefrogs)
    Copyright © 2008 by Albertina P. Lima [et al.] Todos os direitos reservados. Coordenação editorial Albertina P. Lima Claudia Keller William E. Magnusson Capa, projeto gráfico, diagramação e produção Áttema Design Editorial • www.attema.com.br Fotos Dos autores. Exceto a foto de Phrynohyas resinifictrix (D)de autoria de Benjamim B. da Luz, com o auxílio de Luciana K. Erdtmann e a foto de Chiasmocleis shudikarensis (D)de autoria de Selvino Neckel-Oliveira. Filmagens Karl S. Mokross, exceto a filmagem da espécie Trachycephalus resinifictrix de autoria de Olivier Jauboin e Ceratophrys cornuta de autoria de Vicky Flechas. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA Diretor: Adalberto Luis Val Ficha catalográfica elaborada pela Biblioteca do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Guia de sapos da Reserva Adolpho Ducke, Amazônia Central = Guide to the frogs of Reserva Adolpho Ducke, Central Amazonia / Albertina Pimentel Lima ...[et al.]. – Manaus : Áttema Design Editorial, 2008. 1 CD-ROM ; color. ; (4 ¾ pol.). ISBN: 978-85-99387-04-7 1. Herpetologia. 2. Anfíbios Anuros. 3. Reserva Adolpho Ducke. 4. Pimentel Lima, Albertina CDD - 597.8 Bibliotecária: CRB Rua Leonor Teles, 271-b • Conjunto Abílio Nery • Adrianópolis CEP 69.060-001 • Manaus • AM • Brasil Tel.: 55 (92) 3642.2754 • Tel./Fax: 55 (92) 3642.0004 • [email protected] www.attema.com.br How to use this Guide Guide to the Frogs of Reserva Adolpho Ducke Prefácio Preface ais de dois séculos se passaram ore than two centuries have desde que a Ciência descobriu passed since scientists first a riqueza biológica da Bacia became aware of the rich Amazônica. Exploradores natu- biota of the Amazon Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Alive!
    Amazon Alive! A decade of discovery 1999-2009 The Amazon is the planet’s largest rainforest and river basin. It supports countless thousands of species, as well as 30 million people. © Brent Stirton / Getty Images / WWF-UK © Brent Stirton / Getty Images The Amazon is the largest rainforest on Earth. It’s famed for its unrivalled biological diversity, with wildlife that includes jaguars, river dolphins, manatees, giant otters, capybaras, harpy eagles, anacondas and piranhas. The many unique habitats in this globally significant region conceal a wealth of hidden species, which scientists continue to discover at an incredible rate. Between 1999 and 2009, at least 1,200 new species of plants and vertebrates have been discovered in the Amazon biome (see page 6 for a map showing the extent of the region that this spans). The new species include 637 plants, 257 fish, 216 amphibians, 55 reptiles, 16 birds and 39 mammals. In addition, thousands of new invertebrate species have been uncovered. Owing to the sheer number of the latter, these are not covered in detail by this report. This report has tried to be comprehensive in its listing of new plants and vertebrates described from the Amazon biome in the last decade. But for the largest groups of life on Earth, such as invertebrates, such lists do not exist – so the number of new species presented here is no doubt an underestimate. Cover image: Ranitomeya benedicta, new poison frog species © Evan Twomey amazon alive! i a decade of discovery 1999-2009 1 Ahmed Djoghlaf, Executive Secretary, Foreword Convention on Biological Diversity The vital importance of the Amazon rainforest is very basic work on the natural history of the well known.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Karima (Euphorbiaceae), a New Crotonoid Genus from West Tropical Africa Long Hidden Within Croton
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Discovering Karima (Euphorbiaceae), a New Crotonoid Genus from West Tropical Africa Long Hidden within Croton Martin Cheek1*, Gill Challen1, Aiah Lebbie2, Hannah Banks1, Patricia Barberá3, Ricarda Riina3* 1 Science Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, United Kingdom, 2 National Herbarium of Sierra Leone, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Njala University, PMB, Freetown, Sierra Leone, 3 Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Real Jardín Botánico, RJB-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo, Madrid, Spain * [email protected] (MC); [email protected] (RR) Abstract Croton scarciesii (Euphorbiaceae-Crotonoideae), a rheophytic shrub from West Africa, is OPEN ACCESS shown to have been misplaced in Croton for 120 years, having none of the diagnostic char- Citation: Cheek M, Challen G, Lebbie A, Banks H, acters of that genus, but rather a set of characters present in no known genus of the family. Barberá P, Riina R (2016) Discovering Karima Pollen analysis shows that the new genus Karima belongs to the inaperturate crotonoid (Euphorbiaceae), a New Crotonoid Genus from West Tropical Africa Long Hidden within Croton. PLoS group. Analysis of a concatenated molecular dataset combining trnL-F and rbcL sequences ONE 11(4): e0152110. doi:10.1371/journal. positioned Karima as sister to Neoholstia from south eastern tropical Africa in a well-sup- pone.0152110 ported clade comprised of genera of subtribes Grosserineae and Neoboutonieae of the ina- Editor: Nico Cellinese, University of Florida, UNITED perturate crotonoid genera. Several morphological characters support the relationship of STATES Karima with Neoholstia, yet separation is merited by numerous characters usually associ- Received: January 5, 2016 ated with generic rank in Euphorbiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/09/2021 12:24:23AM Via Free Access 2 IAWA Journal, Vol
    IAWA Journal, Vol. 26 (1), 2005: 1-68 WOOD ANATOMY OF THE SUBFAMILY EUPHORBIOIDEAE A comparison with subfamilies Crotonoideae and Acalyphoideae and the implications for the circumscription of the Euphorbiaceae Alberta M. W. Mennega Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Utrecht University branch, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 es Utrecht, The Netherlands SUMMARY The wood anatomy was studied of 82 species from 34 out of 54 genera in the subfamily Euphorbioideae, covering all five tribes recognized in this subfamily. In general the woods show a great deal of similarity. They are charac­ terized by a relative paucity of vessels, often arranged in short to long, dumbbell-shaped or twin, radial multiples, and by medium-sized to large intervessel pits; fibres often have gelatinous walls; parenchyma apotracheal in short, wavy, narrow bands and diffuse-in-aggregates; mostly uni- or only locally biseriate rays, strongly heterocellular (except Hippomane, Hura and Pachystroma). Cell contents, either silica or crystals, or both together, are nearly always present and often useful in distinguishing between genera. Radiallaticifers were noticed in most genera, though they are scarce and difficult to trace. The laticifers are generally not surrounded by special cells, except in some genera of the subtribe Euphorbiinae where radiallaticifers are comparatively frequent and conspicuous. Three ofthe five tribes show a great deal of conformity in their anatomy. Stomatocalyceae, however, stand apart from the rest by the combination of the scarcity of vessels, and mostly biseriate, vertically fused and very tall rays. Within Euphorbieae the subtribe Euphorbiinae shows a greater vari­ ation than average, notably in vessel pitting, the frequent presence of two­ celled parenchyma strands, and in size and frequency of the laticifers.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Systematics and Diversity of Extant Amphibians
    Systematics and Diversity of 3 Extant Amphibians he three extant lissamphibian lineages (hereafter amples of classic systematics papers. We present widely referred to by the more common term amphibians) used common names of groups in addition to scientifi c Tare descendants of a common ancestor that lived names, noting also that herpetologists colloquially refer during (or soon after) the Late Carboniferous. Since the to most clades by their scientifi c name (e.g., ranids, am- three lineages diverged, each has evolved unique fea- bystomatids, typhlonectids). tures that defi ne the group; however, salamanders, frogs, A total of 7,303 species of amphibians are recognized and caecelians also share many traits that are evidence and new species—primarily tropical frogs and salaman- of their common ancestry. Two of the most defi nitive of ders—continue to be described. Frogs are far more di- these traits are: verse than salamanders and caecelians combined; more than 6,400 (~88%) of extant amphibian species are frogs, 1. Nearly all amphibians have complex life histories. almost 25% of which have been described in the past Most species undergo metamorphosis from an 15 years. Salamanders comprise more than 660 species, aquatic larva to a terrestrial adult, and even spe- and there are 200 species of caecilians. Amphibian diver- cies that lay terrestrial eggs require moist nest sity is not evenly distributed within families. For example, sites to prevent desiccation. Thus, regardless of more than 65% of extant salamanders are in the family the habitat of the adult, all species of amphibians Plethodontidae, and more than 50% of all frogs are in just are fundamentally tied to water.
    [Show full text]
  • D-299 Webster, Grady L
    UC Davis Special Collections This document represents a preliminary list of the contents of the boxes of this collection. The preliminary list was created for the most part by listing the creators' folder headings. At this time researchers should be aware that we cannot verify exact contents of this collection, but provide this information to assist your research. D-299 Webster, Grady L. Papers. BOX 1 Correspondence Folder 1: Misc. (1954-1955) Folder 2: A (1953-1954) Folder 3: B (1954) Folder 4: C (1954) Folder 5: E, F (1954-1955) Folder 6: H, I, J (1953-1954) Folder 7: K, L (1954) Folder 8: M (1954) Folder 9: N, O (1954) Folder 10: P, Q (1954) Folder 11: R (1954) Folder 12: S (1954) Folder 13: T, U, V (1954) Folder 14: W (1954) Folder 15: Y, Z (1954) Folder 16: Misc. (1949-1954) D-299 Copyright ©2014 Regents of the University of California 1 Folder 17: Misc. (1952) Folder 18: A (1952) Folder 19: B (1952) Folder 20: C (1952) Folder 21: E, F (1952) Folder 22: H, I, J (1952) Folder 23: K, L (1952) Folder 24: M (1952) Folder 25: N, O (1952) Folder 26: P, Q (1952-1953) Folder 27: R (1952) Folder 28: S (1951-1952) Folder 29: T, U, V (1951-1952) Folder 30: W (1952) Folder 31: Misc. (1954-1955) Folder 32: A (1955) Folder 33: B (1955) Folder 34: C (1954-1955) Folder 35: D (1955) Folder 36: E, F (1955) Folder 37: H, I, J (1955-1956) Folder 38: K, L (1955) Folder 39: M (1955) D-299 Copyright ©2014 Regents of the University of California 2 Folder 40: N, O (1955) Folder 41: P, Q (1954-1955) Folder 42: R (1955) Folder 43: S (1955) Folder 44: T, U, V (1955) Folder 45: W (1955) Folder 46: Y, Z (1955?) Folder 47: Misc.
    [Show full text]
  • Synapturanus Rabus Pyburn, 1977 in Peru (Amphibia: Anura: Istributio D Microhylidae): Filling Gap 1* and Diego F
    Check List 8(2): 274-275, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution N Synapturanus rabus Pyburn, 1977 in Peru (Amphibia: Anura: ISTRIBUTIO D Microhylidae): filling gap 1* and Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia 2 RAPHIC G EO Jhon J. López-Rojas G N O 1 Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. Calle Pevas 5ta Cuadra, Iquitos, Perú. *2 CorrespondingUniversidad San author. Francisco E-mail: de Quito, [email protected] Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas & Ambientales, Campus Cumbayá, Edif. Darwin, of. DW-010A, calle Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador. OTES N Abstract: We report herein the second locality of Synapturanus rabus Pyburn, 1977 in Peru, based on specimens collected at Reserva Forestal Santa Cruz, department of Loreto. In addition, a general description of the call is provided. The microhylid genus Synapturanus Carvalho, 1954 currently includes three species distributed across the Guiana region and Amazonia: Synapturanus mirandaribeiroi Nelson and Lescure, 1975; S. rabus Pyburn, 1977; and S. salseri Pyburn, 1975. Synapturanus rabus is known to occur in Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru (Pyburn 1977; Wild 1995; Gordo et al. 2006). In Peru it A B Tëbu, in the headwaters of the River Gálvez, close to the Riverwas reported Blanco, for05°51’30” the first timeS, 73°45’37” from the W,Matses ca. 100-180 region (Itia m, department of Loreto) (Gordo et al. 2006). We are pleased to report the second locality of Synapturanus rabus from Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review of the Frog Family Hylidae, with Special Reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis and Taxonomic Revision
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE FROG FAMILY HYLIDAE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HYLINAE: PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS AND TAXONOMIC REVISION JULIAÂ N FAIVOVICH Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology (E3B) Columbia University, New York, NY ([email protected]) CEÂ LIO F.B. HADDAD Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiocieÃncias, Unversidade Estadual Paulista, C.P. 199 13506-900 Rio Claro, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) PAULO C.A. GARCIA Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, AÂ rea de CieÃncias da SauÂde Curso de Biologia, Rua CaÃndido Xavier de Almeida e Souza 200 08780-911 Mogi das Cruzes, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil and Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de SaÄo Paulo, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) DARREL R. FROST Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) JONATHAN A. CAMPBELL Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, Texas 76019 ([email protected]) WARD C. WHEELER Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 294, 240 pp., 16 ®gures, 2 tables, 5 appendices Issued June 24, 2005 Copyright q American Museum of Natural History 2005 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................... 6 Resumo .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Revision and Phylogenetic Position of Osteocephalus Festae (Anura, Hylidae) with Description of Its Larva
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 70:Taxonomic 67–92 (2010) revision and phylogenetic position of Osteocephalus festae (Anura, Hylidae) 67 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.70.765 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic position of Osteocephalus festae (Anura, Hylidae) with description of its larva Santiago R. Ron1, Eduardo Toral1, Pablo J. Venegas2, Charles W. Barnes1 1 Museo de Zoología, Escuela de Biología, Pontifi cia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Av. 12 de Octubre y Roca, Aptdo. 17-01-2184, Quito, Ecuador 2 División de Herpetología-Centro de Ornitología y Biodiversidad (CORBIDI), Santa Rita N˚105 Of. 202, Urb. Huertos de San Antonio, Surco, Lima, Perú Corresponding author : Santiago R. Ron ( [email protected] ) Academic editor: Franco Andreone | Received 10 August 2010 | Accepted 23 November 2010 | Published 29 November 2010 Citation: Ron SR, Toral E, Venegas PJ, Barnes CW (2010) Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic position of Osteocephalus festae (Anura, Hylidae) with description of its larva. ZooKeys 70 : 67 – 92 . doi: 10.3897/zookeys.70.765 Abstract Osteocephalus festae is an Amazonian species recently resurrected from a synonymy with O. buckleyi. Be- cause few specimens are known, its morphological variation, diagnostic characters, and distribution are poorly understood. Herein we determine its phylogenetic relationships and provide a complete taxonomic account based on recently collected specimens (adults and larvae) from nine localities in Ecuador and Peru. Osteocephalus festae is most similar to O. verruciger from which it diff ers in having less tuberculate dorsal skin on males, smaller tympanum, and more tooth rows in the oral disk of larvae.
    [Show full text]