A Study of Pre-Historic Stone Age Period of India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Paleolithic Archaeology in Iran
Intl. J. Humianities (2011) Vol. 18 (2): (63-87) Paleolithic Archaeology in Iran Hamed Vahdati Nasab 1 Received:21/9/2010 Accepted:27/2/2011 Abstract Although the Iranian plateau has witnessed Paleolithic researches since the early twenty century, still little is known about the Paleolithic of Iran. There are several reasons for this situation and lack of scholarly enthusiasm on the part of Iranian archaeologists seems to be the most imperative one. Concerning the history of Paleolithic surveys and excavations conducted in Iran, three distinct phases are recognizable. First, from the beginning of the twenty century to the 1980 when numerous field missions were executed in this region all by western institutes, second phase observes a twenty years gap in the Paleolithic studies hence; only few surveys could be performed in this period, and the third phase starts with the reopening of the Iranian fields to the non-Iranian researchers, which led to the survey and excavation of handful of new Paleolithic sites. This article reviews Paleolithic researches conducted in Iran since the beginning of twenty century to the present time. Keywords: Paleolithic, Iran, Zagros, Alborz Downloaded from eijh.modares.ac.ir at 4:34 IRST on Monday September 27th 2021 1. Assistant Professor of Archaeology, Faculty of Humianities, Tarbiat Modares University. [email protected] Paleolithic Archaeology in Iran Intl. J. Humianities (2010) Vol. 18 (1) Introduction The most peculiar point about the Iranian Iran is surrounded by some of the most Paleolithic is the absence of any hominid significant Paleolithic sites in the world. To its remains with just few exceptions (e.g. -
Neolithic-Chalcolithic Potteries of Eastern Uttar-Pradesh
American International Journal of Available online at http://www.iasir.net Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences ISSN (Print): 2328-3734, ISSN (Online): 2328-3696, ISSN (CD-ROM): 2328-3688 AIJRHASS is a refereed, indexed, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary and open access journal published by International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research (IASIR), USA (An Association Unifying the Sciences, Engineering, and Applied Research) Neolithic-Chalcolithic Potteries of Eastern Uttar-Pradesh Dr. Shitala Prasad Singh Associate Professor, Department of Ancient History Archaeology and Culture D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, U.P., India Eastern Uttar-Pradesh (23051’ N. - 280 30’ N. and which 810 31’ E – 810 39’ E) which extends from Allahabad and Kaushambi districts of the province in the west to the Bihar-Bengal border in the east and from the Nepal tarai in the north, to the Baghelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh state in the South. The regions of eastern Uttar Pradesh covering parts or whole of the districts of Mirzapur, Sonbhadra, Sant Ravidas nagar, Varanasi, Allahabad, Kaushambi, Balia, Gonda, Bahraich, Shravasti, Balrampur, Faizabad, Ambedkar Nagar, Sultanpur, Ghazipur, Jaunpur, Pratapgarh, Basti, Siddharth Nagar, Deoria, Kushinagar, Gorakhpur, Maharajganj, Chandauli, Mau and Azamgarh. The entire region may be divided into three distinct geographical units – The Ganga Plain, the Vindhya-Kaimur ranges and the Saryupar region. The eastern Uttar Pradesh has been the cradle of Indian Culture and civilization. It is the land associated with the story of Ramayana. The deductive portions of the Mahabharta are supposed to have got their final shape in this region. The area was the nerve centre of political, economic and religious upheavels of 6th century B.C. -
Quantifying Clovis Dynamics: Confronting Theory with Models and Data Across Scales
QUANTIFYING CLOVIS DYNAMICS: CONFRONTING THEORY WITH MODELS AND DATA ACROSS SCALES by MARCUS JOHN HAMILTON B.Sc., Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 1998 M.S., Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, 2002 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ANTHROPOLOGY The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2008 Marcus J. Hamilton: Quantifying Clovis Dynamics ©2008, Marcus John Hamilton ii Marcus J. Hamilton: Quantifying Clovis Dynamics DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my wife, Ana Desiree Davidson, and the two halves of my family, the UK Hamilton side and the US Davidson side, for all their love and support. I would also like to dedicate this dissertation to two old friends who were instrumental in getting me interested in archaeology, Briggs Buchanan, and Wayne Warren Kinney, Jr. iii Marcus J. Hamilton: Quantifying Clovis Dynamics ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee for their advice and guidance over the years. They are co-chairs, Bruce Huckell and Jim Boone, 3rd department member Ozzie Pearson, and outside member Vance Holliday. Much of this dissertation would not have been possible without access to the Rio Grande Valley Clovis collections, granted by Dr. Robert H. Weber, of Socorro, New Mexico. Bob sadly died in February, 2008 after leading a long and productive life, very much in the tradition of classic Southwest scientists. Over his 80+ years Bob amassed an encyclopedic knowledge of the geology, geography, archaeology and history of the region, much of it on foot with a canteen and map. -
Patna University, Patna Paper – CC-XI, Sem
Chirand Chalcolithic Culture Dr. Dilip Kumar Assistant Professor (Guest) Dept. of Ancient Indian History & Archaeology, Patna University, Patna Paper – CC-XI, Sem. – III With the end of the Neolithic Age, several cultures started using metal, mostly copper and low grade bronze. The culture based on the use of copper and stone was termed as Chalcolithic meaning stone-copper Phase. In India, it spanned around 2000 BC to 700 BC. This culture was mainly seen in Pre-Harappan phase, but at many places it extended to Post-Harappan phase too. The people were mostly rural and lived near hills and rivers. The Chalcolithic culture corresponds to the farming communities, namely Kayatha, Ahar or Banas, Malwa, and Jorwe. The term Chalcolithic is a combination of two words- Chalco+Lithic was derived from the Greek words "khalkos" + "líthos" which means "copper" and "stone" or Copper Age. It is also known as the Eneolithic (from Latin aeneus "of copper") is an archaeological period that is usually considered to be part of the broader Neolithic (although it was originally defined as a transition between the Neolithic and the Bronze Age). Chirand is an archaeological site in the Saran district of Bihar, situated on the northern bank of the Ganga River. It has a large pre-historic mound, known for its continuous archaeological record from the Neolithic age to the reign of the Pal dynasty who ruled during the pre-medieval period; the excavations in Chirand have revealed stratified Neolithic and Iron Age settlements, transitions in human habitation patterns dating from 2500 BC to 30 AD. -
Early Humans- Hunters and Gatherers Worksheet- 1
EARLY HUMANS- HUNTERS AND GATHERERS WORKSHEET- 1 QN QUESTION MA RKS 01 In the early stages, human were _____________ and nomads. 01 a. hunter-gatherers b. advanced c. singers d. musicians 02 Stone tools of _____________ Stone Age are called microliths. 01 a. Old b. New c. Middle d. India 03 One of the greatest discoveries made by early humans was of 01 a. painting b. tool making c. hunting d. fire 04 Bhimbetka, in ______________, is famous for prehistoric cave paintings. 01 a. Uttar Pradesh b. Madhya Pradesh c. Karnataka d. Orissa 05 The __________________ and Baichbal valley in Deccan have many Stone Age 01 sites. a. Burzahom b. Gufkral c. Hunsgi d. Chirand 06 What are artefacts? 01 07 What is the meaning of Palaios in Greek? 01 08 Who is a nomad? 01 09 Where is Altamira located? 01 10 Wheel was invented in which age? 01 11 Which period was known as period of transition? 01 12 True or False 01 Human evolution occurred within a very short span of time. 13 Old stone age people lived in caves and natural rock shelters. 01 14 In Chalcolithic period, humans used only metals. 01 15 Fill in the Blanks:- 01 The old stone age is known as--------------. 16 One of the oldest archaeological sites found in India is--------------- Valley in 01 Karnataka. 17 Write a note on Hunsgi. 03 18 Write a note on tools and implements of stone age people. 03 19 Why the stone age is called so? Give reasons. 03 20 What was the natural change that occurred around 9000BC? How did it help the 03 humans who lived then? 21 Which period in History is known as the Stone -
'Ff415. Atranjikhera, India, Black-And-Red 2450 ± 200 Ware Deposits 500 B.C
[RADIOCARBON, VOL. 11, No. 1, 1969, P. 188-193] TATA INSTITUTE RADIOCARBON DATE LIST VI D. P. AGRAWAL and SHEELA KUSUMGAR Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Bombay-5 This date list is comprised of archaeologic and geophysical samples. The latter are in continuation of our investigations of bomb-produced radiocarbon in atmospheric carbon dioxide reported in Tata V. We con- tinue to count samples in the form of methane; the techniques used have been described elsewhere (Agrawal et al., 1965). Radiocarbon dates presented below are based on C'4 half-life value of 5568 vr. For conversion to A.D./B.C, scale, 1950 A.D. has been used as base vr. Our modern reference standard is 95% activity of N.B.S. oxalic acid. GENERAL COMMENT Radiocarbon dating in India has been mainly confined to Neolithic and Chalcolithic cultures. Despite the dearth of datable material, at- tempts at evolving an absolute chronology for Stone-age cultures have now been started. Bone and shell samples were measured for some Micro- lithic cultures. Rock-shelters of Uttar Pradesh were dated ca. 2400 B.C. (TF-419). Adamgarh rock-shelters were dated ca. 5500 B.C. (TF-120, Radiocarbon, 1968, v. 10, p. 131). Kayatha culture of Madhya Pradesh ap- pears to date from ca. 2000 B.C. Chirand Black-and-Red ware date (TF- 444) confirms the earlier dates (Radiocarbon, 1966, v. 8, p. 442). Terdal Neolithic culture was dated ca. 1800 B.C. A megalith from Halingali was dated ca. 100 B.C. Brief summaries of these excavations are available in Ghosh (1961-1966). -
Saran Introduction
DISTRICT PROFILE SARAN INTRODUCTION Saran district is one of the thirty-eight districts of Bihar. Saran district is a part of Saran division. Saran district is also known as Chhapra district because the headquarters of this district is Chhapra. Saran district is bounded by the districts of Siwan, Gopalganj, West Champaran, Muzaffarpur, Patna, Vaishali and Bhojpur of Bihar and Ballia district of Uttar Pradesh. Important rivers flowing through Saran district are Ganga, Gandak, and Ghaghra which encircle the district from south, north east and west side respectively. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Saran was earlier known as ‘SHARAN’ which means refuge in English, after the name given to a Stupa (pillar) built by Emperor Ashoka. Another view is that the name Saran has been derived from SARANGA- ARANYA or the deer forest since the district was famous for its forests and deer in pre-historic times. In ancient days, the present Saran division, formed a part of Kosala kingdom. According to 'Ain-E-Akbari’, Saran was one of the six Sarkars/ revenue divisions, constituting the province of Bihar. By 1666, the Dutch established their trade in saltpetre at Chhapra. Saran was one of the oldest and biggest districts of Bihar. In 1829, Saran along with Champaran, was included in the Patna Division. Saran was separated from Champaran in 1866 when Champaran district was constituted. In 1981, the three subdivisions of the old Saran district namely Saran, Siwan and Gopalganj became independent districts which formed a part of Saran division. There are a few villages in Saran which are known for their historical and social significance. -
1. Stone Age Technology in India
Stone AEe Technologv in India K,PADDAYYA ABSTRACT This paper presents a review of various aspects of Stone Age (Palaeolithic and Mesolithic) general technology in lndia. After initial remarks about the history of Prehistoric studies and culture Sequence, detailed observations are made about how changes in raw material of utilization, experienced from time to time, and consequent improvements in techniques tool-manufacture and tooltypes themselves led to changes in subsistence and settlement patterns of Stone Age hunter-gatherer groups. The review concludes with remarks highlighting the need for identification of regional settlement systems, functional interpretation of lithic of non- assemblages, study of present-day use of stone for various purposes, and recognition utilitarian dimensions of Stone Age technology. CONTENTS l.lNTRODUCT10N 2.HISttORY OF PREHISttORiC RESEARCH 3 FIRST PARADIGM 4.PARADIGM SHIFT 5.FRESH FIELD RESEARCH 6.GENERAL CULttURE SEQUENCE 7.USE OF ORCANIC MAttERIALS 8.LITHIC ttECHNOLOGY A.lmprovements in raw mateHal ulllza10n 9.SttUDIES iN TECHNOLOGY A.Lower PalaeolithlC B.Mlddle and Upper Palaeolithic C.Mesolnhic 10 GENERALTRENDS ロ ロ 暉 r‐ ‐ ロ ロ 口 ‐ 甲 甲 ― ― ― ― ― ■ ■ 口 ‐ 口 ‐ 口 甲 暉 "― ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 甲 ・ |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||■ ANCIENT INDiA,NEW SERIES,NO.1 11. TASKS AHEAD A" Regional adaPtive sYstems B. Functional interPretations C. Rspects of non-utilitarian behaviour learning D. Ethnography as a source of 「 IIIiDIDNOTPROGRESSUNIFORMLYORSTEADILYBUTHEDIDPROGRESSONTHE1/VHOLE MAKING AND T00L― USiNG CREATURE WHO FROM A FAIRLY INEFFICIENT AN!MAL TO A T00L― DOMINATED THE VVHOLE PLANET BY HIS NUMBERS AND B漱 ::[:η晏[li:Fギ ∫」][担 ACTIVITY,AND HAS NOⅥ′ONLY TO LEARN TO CONTROL Hい I. INTRODUCTION upon certain aspects a review of the evidence bearing paper I propose to present by H' D' 7futhis This topic was first dealt with ur,d Mesolithic t"tft*togy in lndia' Llof Palaeolithi. -
COGNITIVE ARCHAEOLOGY: in SEARCH of the EARLIEST SYNTACTIC LANGUAGE-USERS in HIMALAYA Maheshwar P
COGNITIVE ARCHAEOLOGY: IN SEARCH OF THE EARLIEST SYNTACTIC LANGUAGE-USERS IN HIMALAYA Maheshwar P. Joshi Recent scientific studies unfold that neural structures bearing on intonation of speech have a deep evolutionary history traced to mammal-like reptiles called therapsids found in the Triassic period (∼252.17 mya, million years ago). Therefore, these structures were already present in the primates. It goes to the credit of Homo sapiens who developed it to the extent that humans are defined as symbolling animals, for language is the most articulated symbolism. Cognitive archaeology makes it clear that it took hominins millions of years to develop a syntactic language. Stratigraphically controlled and securely established artefact-bearing sites of the Middle Palaeolithic Arjun complex in the Deokhuri Valley, West Nepal, provide firm dates for the presence of the earliest syntactic language speakers in Himalaya from 100 ka to 70 ka (thousand years ago). Keywords: cognitive archaeology, neural structure, syntactic language, verbal communication, Arjun complex 1. Introduction Study of prehistory of language falls in the domain of cognitive archaeology and this discipline ‘is still in early development’ (Renfrew 2008: 67). To the best of my information, no scholar studying South Asian prehistory has addressed this issue despite the fact that South Asia is very rich in material culture vis-à-vis prehistory of language (see for details, Joshi 2014: in press-a; Joshi 2017: in press-b). Since my primary concern in this essay is Himalaya in general and Central Himalaya in particular, I will focus on the earliest syntactic language-users in the context of Central Himalaya. -
2. the Geographical Setting and Pre-Historic Cultures of India
MODULE - 1 Ancient India 2 Notes THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING AND PRE-HISTORIC CULTURES OF INDIA The history of any country or region cannot be understood without some knowledge of its geography. The history of the people is greatly conditioned by the geography and environment of the region in which they live. The physical geography and envi- ronmental conditions of a region include climate, soil types, water resources and other topographical features. These determine the settlement pattern, population spread, food products, human behaviour and dietary habits of a region. The Indian subcontinent is gifted with different regions with their distinct geographical features which have greatly affected the course of its history. Geographically speaking the Indian subcontinent in ancient times included the present day India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Pakistan. On the basis of geographical diversities the subcontinent can be broadly divided into the follow- ing main regions. These are: (i) The Himalayas (ii) The River Plains of North India (iii) The Peninsular India OBJECTIVES After studying this lesson, you will be able to: explain the physical divisions of Indian subcontinent; recognize the distinct features of each region; understand why some geographical areas are more important than the others; define the term environment; establish the relationship between geographical features and the historical devel- opments in different regions; define the terms prehistory, prehistoric cultures, and microliths; distinguish between the lower, middle and upper Palaeolithic age on the basis of the tools used; explain the Mesolithic age as a phase of transition on the basis of climate and the 10 HISTORY The Geographical Setting and pre-historic MODULE - 1 Ancient India tools used; explain the Neolithic age and its chief characteristics; differentiate between Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods and learn about the Prehistoric Art. -
The Upper Ganges River (Downstream)
THE UPPER GANGES RIVER (DOWNSTREAM) In late 2019 we will inaugurate an ‘all Ganges’ voyage of one thousand miles from Kolkata to Varanasi. Though in the days of the British Raj paddle steamers plied this route on a regular basis, with the advent of the railways in India river navigation was abandoned and the rivers were allowed to silt up. Now thanks to a multi-million dollar investment from the Indian Government channels have been dredged and buoyed and hi tech GPS based aids installed enabling seasonal navigation. Varanasi, said to be the oldest inhabited city on the planet is the most sacred city of Hinduism and a place of overwhelming beauty at the same time poignantly moving with its cremation ghats. Varanasi is surely the goal of any ‘passage to India’ and at the other end of the holy river stands Kolkata, in all its Raj-like magnificence. Between lies several of the most important Buddhist sites including Sarnath, Nalanda and Bodh Gaya and cities great and small and between urban centres and great pilgrim sites are expanses of empty river teeming with bird life, not to mention the Gangeatic dolphin. number of staterooms from sixteen to fourteen to create an No vessel could be more appropriate for a voyage on ‘All the enlarged indoor saloon / dining area as winter cruising in India Ganges’ than the much-loved Katha Pandaw, constructed can be chilly first thing. originally in Vietnam in 2008 that has seen service there, in Cambodia and in recent years in Burma. Refitted for expedition ITINERARY sailings in India, we have reduced the DAY 1 VARANASI The oldest and holiest city of India established in the 11th century BC and today with over 2,000 living temples. -
East Cenyral Railway 10 Days Report Section
EAST CENYRAL RAILWAY INSTALLATION FOR : HJP/DNR/SEE/SPJ 10 DAYS REPORT REPORT ID : AFDAYS10_TEST_1904 SECTION : 160 and 161 PAGE NO : 1 FROM : 01-JAN-14 TO : 12-FEB-14 DATE : 12-FEB-14 TIME : 03:52:18 PM Co6number Billid Billdesc Partyname Co6status Co7number Chequenumber Co6date Billdate Billamount Co6statusdate amount & Date 160002645 851 MEDICAL BILL PANCHRATNA DAWA KENDRA AC NO 4037002100004012 P C 201316000605 783837 01-JAN-14 18-OCT-13 76734 N B HAJIPUR 13-JAN-14 76734 13-JAN-14 160002646 866 MEDICAL BILL PANCHRATNA DAWA KENDRA AC NO 4037002100004012 P C 201316000606 783837 01-JAN-14 07-NOV-13 20160 N B HAJIPUR 13-JAN-14 20160 13-JAN-14 160002647 878 MEDICAL BILL PANCHRATNA DAWA KENDRA AC NO 4037002100004012 P C 201316000605 783837 01-JAN-14 22-NOV-13 49680 N B HAJIPUR 13-JAN-14 49680 13-JAN-14 160002648 889 MEDICAL BILL PANCHRATNA DAWA KENDRA AC NO 4037002100004012 P C 201316000605 783837 01-JAN-14 27-NOV-13 22837 N B HAJIPUR 13-JAN-14 22837 13-JAN-14 160002649 894 MEDICAL BILL PANCHRATNA DAWA KENDRA AC NO 4037002100004012 P C 201316000606 783837 01-JAN-14 27-NOV-13 13154 N B HAJIPUR 13-JAN-14 13154 13-JAN-14 160002650 841 MEDICAL BILL PANCHRATNA DAWA KENDRA AC NO 4037002100004012 P C 201316000605 783837 01-JAN-14 08-OCT-13 23460 N B HAJIPUR 13-JAN-14 23460 13-JAN-14 160002651 856 MEDICAL BILL PANCHRATNA DAWA KENDRA AC NO 4037002100004012 P C 201316000605 783837 01-JAN-14 23-SEP-13 36750 N B HAJIPUR 13-JAN-14 36750 13-JAN-14 160002652 842 MEDICAL BILL PANCHRATNA DAWA KENDRA AC NO 4037002100004012 P C 201316000605 783837 01-JAN-14