On the Bryoflora of the «Bryansky Les» Reserve

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Bryoflora of the «Bryansky Les» Reserve Arctoa (2007) 16: 175-180 ON THE BRYOFLORA OF THE «BRYANSKY LES» RESERVE (NERUSSO-DESNYANSKOYE POLESSYE, EUROPEAN RUSSIA) К БРИОФЛОРЕ ЗАПОВЕДНИКА «БРЯНСКИЙ ЛЕС» (НЕРУССО-ДЕСНЯНСКОЕ ПОЛЕСЬЕ, ЕВРОПЕЙСКАЯ ЧАСТЬ РОССИИ) L.N. ANISHCHENKO1 Л.Н. АНИЩЕНКО1 Abstract The annotated list of the bryophyte of the reserve «Bryansky Les» includes 121 species and 1 variety. For each species we show the systematic, the living place, locations of the rare species and the ecological group. Резюме Аннотированный список мохообразных заповедника «Брянский лес» состоит из 121 вида и 1 разновидности. Для видов указаны частота встречаемости, эколого- ценотическая приуроченность, субстраты поселения, места сбора редко и очень редко распространенных бриофитов. INTRODUCTION (70%), while some are mesotrophic (25%) and oli- Nowadays the inventory of biodiversity is an gotrophic (5%). Meadows occupy about 10% of important task, and especially so in protected areas the territory and are characteristic for flood plains where it may serve for further monitoring of habitat (Fedotov &Yevstigneyev; 1997). changes. The aim of the present study is to charac- The bryoflora of the reserve «Bryansky Les» terize the bryoflora of Bryanky Les Reserve for the has been investigated by some authors (Popov; assessment of floristical, structural and ecological 1988; Fedotov & Yevstigneyev; 1997; Fedotov; diversity of standard communities. 1999; Morosova; 1999; Yevstigneyev; 1999). STUDY AREA, MATERIAL AND METHODS These authors reported 98 species, however their The reserve «Bryansky Les» was established specimens in the herbarium of the reserve include in Trubchevsky and Souzemsky Districts of Bry- only 55 species. Most species were identified for ansk Province in 1987. It is situated in the Prid- the ecological and geobotanical studies, thus rep- esnyansky physiographical region of the Predpo- resenting mainly dominant species. Some spe- lesskaya province of mixed forests (Gvozdetsky cies were found to be characteristic for certain & Zhuchkova; 1963). The territory of the reserve types of mires and forest communities (Fedotov is 121.86 sq. km. Forests cover 77% of its territory; & Yevstigneyev; 1997). most of them belong to pine and oak-pine forests In 2004-2006 the bryophyte vegetation of the (37%) and their derivates (36%). Forests of birch reserve was studued. The releves were made for and aspen are spread on the watershed and near- the standard plots of 10 m2 for meadows and mires, by areas. and 100 m2 for forests. The position of bryophyte Peatlands occupy 21 sq.km, or 18% of the re- species within this or that bioecological group was serve territory. There is a variety of types domi- identified from the combined datamatrix that in- nated by hypnalean mosses, Sphagnum, sedges, cludes both bryophytes and vascular plants (cf. grasses, and Alnus. Most of them are eutrophic Smirnova et al.; 2004). 1 – Dept. of Ecology and Rational use of natural resources, Bryansk State University, Bezhizkaya 14, Bryansk 241036 Russia – 241036 Брянск, Бежицкая, 14, Брянский гос. университет им. акад. И.Г. Петровского, кафедра экологии и рационального природопользования 176 L.N. ANISHCHENKO THE ANNOTATED LIST OF MOSSES Brachytheciastrum velutinum (Hedw.) Ignatov & Hut- The vaucher speciemens are kept in the Depart- tunen – fq, Nm, flood-plain broad-leaved forests; on ment of Botany of the Bryansk State University. tree trunks and rotten wood. In the following list, the nomenclature is given Brachythecium albicans (Hedw.) Bruch et al. – r (4 samples kv. in 29; 3 in kv. 30), MDr, steppe, bushy according to Ignatov, Afonina, Ignatova et al. meadows; on soil and rocks; 2. (2006) for mosses and according to Konstantino- B. campestre (Müll. Hal.) Bruch et al. – sp, Nm, broad- va et al. (1992) for hepatics. leaved forests; on soil and rocks; 1, 3. The frequency is abbreviated as follow: rr – B. mildeanum (Schimp.) Schimp. – fq, MFr, fresh flood- very rare (from 1 to 4 samples); r – rare (5–10); sp plains, wet post-forest meadows; on soil; 1. – sporadic (10–19); fq – frequent (20–50); fqq – B. rivulare Bruch et al. – fq, Nt, alder swamp; on rotten very frequent (over 50). wood and soil; 1, 3. After the species frequency, the abbreviation B. salebrosum (F. Weber & D. Mohr) Bruch et al. – sp, of bioecogroup is given: Br – boreal forest, Nm – Nm, flood-plain broad-leaved forests; on soil and tree trunks; 2, 3. nemoral forest, Pn – pine forest, MFr – fresh mead- Bryum argenteum Hedw. – fq, Ad, bushy meadows, ow, MDr – dry meadow, InW – aquatic, Olg – oli- roadside meadows; on soil and rocks; 2, 3. gotrophic bogs, Sw – mesotrophic mires, Ad – B. caespiticium Hedw. – fqq, Ad, broad-leaved and co- adventive, Nt – nitrophillous. This grouping fol- niferous-broad-leaved forests; on rotten wood and lows Smirnova et al. (2004) and the position in a soil; 2, 3. group was identified by the constancy and the B. pseudotriquetrum (Hedw.) Gaertn.et al. – sp, Sw, most frequent occurrence within this or that group mires dominated by hypnalean mosses, sedges, of plant communities. grasses+Sphagna; on soil; 1, 2, 3, 4. Types of vegetation and characteristic sub- Buxbaumia aphylla Hedw. – rr (2 samples in kv. 27), Pn, pine forest with lichen cover and with Vaccinium strates are given as well. vitis-idea; on soil; 2, 3. In the end of annotations, the numbers refer Callicladium haldanianum (Grev.) H.A. Crum – fqq, to the publications as follow: 1 – Fedotov (1999); Pn, mossy pine forests; on rotten wood and soil; 3. 2 – Fedotov & Yevstigneyev (1997); 3 – Morozo- Calliergonella cuspidata (Hedw.) Loeske – fqq, MFr, va (1999); 4 – Popov (1988). fresh flood-plain meadows, on soil; more rarely in Species mentioned only in literature, but not alder swamps, on soil and rotten wood; 1, 2. confirmed by herbarium specimens are marked Calliergon cordifolium (Hedw.) Kindb. – fqq, MFr, by asterisk *. For rare species their localities are fresh flood-plain, bushy wet meadows; more rarely specifies up to kv. (=kvartal, or forest unit). in alder swamps and grassy mires, on soil; 1, 2, 3. C. giganteum (Schimp.) Kindb. – sp, Nt, wet flood-plains, Abietinella abietina (Hedw.) Fleisch. – fq, MDr, steppe, alder swamps, sedge-Sphaga mires; on soil; 1, 2, 3. bushy meadows, roadside meadows; on soil and rocks; Campylidium sommerfeltii (Myr.) Ochyra – sp, Nm, 2, 3. broad-leaved forests with open herbaceous layer; on Amblystegium serpens (Hedw.) Bruch et al. – sp, Nm, rotten wood. broad-leaved and birch-aspen forests; on tree trunks, Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid. – fq, Ad, bare soil soil, rocks; 2, 3. along ground roads and trails in forests, fresh flood- A. serpens var. juratzkanum (Schimp.) Rau & Herv. – plains; on soil, tree trunks, rocks; 1, 2, 3. sp, Nm, broad-leaved and birch-aspen forests; on Climacium dendroides (Hedw.) F. Weber & D. Mohr – soil and rocks. fqq, Nt, pine forests with hypnalean mosses, Spha- Anomodon longifolius (Brid.) Hartm. – fq, Nm, flood- gna, and Vaccinium myrtyllus, flood-plain alder for- plain broad-leaved and alder forests; on tree trunks; 3. ests, bushy mires with hypnalean mosses; on soil, A. viticulosus (Hedw.) Hook. & Tayl. – fq, Nm, flood- bases of tree trunks, rotten wood; 1, 2, 3. plain broad-leaved forests, more rarely in mixed for- Cratoneuron filicinum (Hedw.) Spruce – r (1 sample in ests with spruce; on tree trunks; 3. kv. 41, 4 samples in kv. 57; 2 samples in kv. 94), Sw, Atrichum undulatum (Hedw.) P. Beauv. – sp, Nm, birch- hypnalean mires, calcareous rock outcrops near aspen forest and broad-leaved forests with spruce with springs; on soil and rocks; 1. open herb-layer; on rotten wood and soil; 1, 2, 3. Dicranella heteromalla (Hedw.) Schimp. – sp, Nm, Aulacomnium palustre (Hedw.) Schwägr. – fq, Sw, bog- flood-plain broad-leaved forests; on soil; 2, 3. gy pine forest with Ledum; on soil and rotten wood; D. rufescens (Dicks.) Schimp. – sp, Pn, Calamagrostis 1, 2, 3. meadow in whatershed; on soil; 2, 3. Bryoflora of the “Bryansky Les” Reserve 177 Dicranum bonjeanii De Not. – r (5 samples in kv. 116), Olg, to fresh and sometimes bushy flood-plain meadows; sphagnous and sphagnous–grassy mires; on soil; 1. on soil; 3. D. fragilifolium Lindb. – r (5 samples in kv. 100; 2 Leucobryum glaucum (Hedw.) Ångstr. – rr (2 samples samples in kv. 117), Nm, flood-plain broad-leaved in kv. 96; 1 in kv. 100), Br, mixed forest of spruce forests; on tree trunks; 3. and broad-leaved trees and their derivates; on soil; D. montanum Hedw. – fq, Nm, flood-plain broad-leaved 2, 3. forests; on rotten wood, tree trunks and soil; 3. Leucodon sciuroides (Hedw.) Schwägr. – sp, Pn, pine D. polysetum Sw. – fqq, Pn, pine and birch forests, on forests; on tree trunks including their bases. rotten wood and soil; 2, 3. Mnium stellare Hedw. – fqq, Nm, flood-plain broad- D. scoparium Hedw. – sp, Pn, mossy and herbaceous leaved forests with scattered herbaceous layer, old pine forests; on rotten wood, soil and rocks; 1, 2, 3. roads in forest; on soil. D. viride (Sull. & Lesq.) Lindb.– r (6 samples in kv. Neckera pennata Hedw. – sp, Nm, flood-plain broad- 100; 2 in kv. 121), Nm, old oak forests in flood plain; leaved and more rarely aspen forests; on tree trunks; 3. on tree trunks and rotten wood; 3. Orthotrichum obtusifolium Brid. – fqq, Nm, flood-plain Drepanocladus aduncus (Hedw.) Warnst. – sp, Sw, broad-leaved forests; on tree trunks; 2, 3. mires dominated by hypnalean mosses, grasses, sedg- O. speciosum Nees – fqq, Nm, flood-plain broad- es, alder swamps, springs; on soil; 1, 3. leaved and more rarely aspen forests; on tree trunks; D. polygamus (Bruch et al.) Hedenäs – sp, Sw, mires 2, 3. dominated by hypnalean mosses, rarely in oak fo- Oxyrrhynchium hians (Hedw.) Loeske – sр, Nm, mixed rests; on soil and wood; 3. spruce and broad-leaved forests; on tree trunks and Eurhynchiastrum pulchellum (Hedw.) Ignatov & Hut- soil; 2, 3. tunen – sp, Nm, wet broad-leaved and coniferous Paludella squarrosa (Hedw.) Brid.
Recommended publications
  • New Bryophyte Records. 1 — Новые Бриологические Находки
    Arctoa (2012) 21: 275-300 NEW BRYOPHYTE RECORDS. 1 — НОВЫЕ БРИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ НАХОДКИ. 1 С 21 тома Арктоа раздел Новые находки будет Since 21 volume, the format of New Bryophyte изменен таким образом, что весь он станет кол- Records in Arctoa will be changed. It will appear as one лективной публикацией и (1) будет иметь общий article of many authors, and (1) will have one bibliogra- список литературы; (2) после списка литературы будет phy for all contributions; (2) list of authors with address- следовать список авторов с адресами и ссылками на es and grant ackowledgements will be after bibliogra- гранты. phy. Материалы рубрики могут быть процитированы Citation of New Bryophyte Record’ material may be двумя способами: in two ways: Ivanov I.I. 2020. New moss records from Ivanono Ivanov I.I. 2020. New moss records from Ivanono Province. 1. – In: Sofronova E.V. (ed.) New bryophyte Province. 1. – In: Sofronova E.V. (ed.) New bryophyte records. 10. Arctoa 30: 300-350. records. 10. Arctoa 30: 300-350. Sofronova E.V., Aleksandrov A.A., Ivanov A.I., Sofronova E.V., Aleksandrov A.A., Ivanov A.I., Ivanov I.A., Ivanov I.I., Volkov V.V. 2020. New bryo- Ivanov I.A., Ivanov I.I., Volkov V.V. 2020. New bryo- phyte records. 10. – Arctoa 30: 300-350. phyte records. 10. – Arctoa 30: 300-350. Нумерация публикаций в серии «Новые The series of New Bryophyte Records will start in бриологические находки. 1 — New bryophyte records. vol. 21 since the first number: «Новые бриологические 1» начнется с 21 тома, однако нумерация находок по находки.
    [Show full text]
  • Mchy Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej W Obliczu Antropogenicznych Przemian Szaty Roślinnej
    Title: Mchy Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej w obliczu antropogenicznych przemian szaty roślinnej Author: Barbara Fojcik Citation style: Fojcik Barbara. (2011). Mchy Wyżyny Krakowsko- Częstochowskiej w obliczu antropogenicznych przemian szaty roślinnej. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Mchy Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej w obliczu antropogenicznych przemian szaty roślinnej NR 2800 Barbara Fojcik Mchy Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej w obliczu antropogenicznych przemian szaty roślinnej Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Katowice 2011 Redaktor serii: Biologia Iwona Szarejko Recenzenci Halina Bednarek-Ochyra, Jan Żarnowiec Publikacja będzie dostępna — po wyczerpaniu nakładu — w wersji internetowej: Śląska Biblioteka Cyfrowa www.sbc.org.pl Na okładce: okolice Trzyciąża (fot. B. Fojcik), wychodnia skalna na Górze Zborów (fot. A. Rostański), Syntrichia ruralis (fot. Vitěslav Plášek) Redaktor: Barbara Todos-Burny Wydawca Projektant okładki: Tomasz Gut Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Redaktor techniczny: Barbara Arenhövel ul. Bankowa 12B, 40-007 Katowice Korektor: Mirosława Żłobińska www.wydawnictwo.us.edu.pl e-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2011 by Wydanie I. Ark. druk. 14,5. Ark. wyd. 19,5. Papier Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego offset kl. III, 90 g Cena 24 zł (+VAT) Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone Łamanie: Pracownia Składu Komputerowego Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Druk i oprawa: PPHU TOTEM s.c. ISSN 0208-6336 M. Rejnowski, J. Zamiara ISBN 978-83-226-1969-8 ul. Jacewska 89, 88-100 Inowrocław Spis treści Wstęp 7 1. Ogólna charakterystyka Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej 9 1.1. Położenie i granice 9 1.2. Rzeźba terenu 10 1.3. Geologia 11 1.4. Gleby 12 1.5. Hydrografia 13 1.6. Klimat 13 1.7. Szata roślinna 14 1.8. Wpływ człowieka na stan środowiska przyrodniczego 19 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Estonian Bryophytes
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 52: 109–127 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/fce.2015.52.14 Annotated checklist of Estonian bryophytes Kai Vellak1,2, Nele Ingerpuu2, Mare Leis3 & Loore Ehrlich4 1Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise Street, Tartu 51014. E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, Tartu 51005. E-mail: [email protected] 3Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 5 Fr. R. Kreutzwald Street, 51014 Tartu. E-mail: [email protected] 4Estonian Museum of Natural History, 26 Toompuiestee Street, 10148 Tallinn. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The updated list of Estonian bryophytes includes 594 species from all three phyla. Only one species is reported for Estonia according to the literature data, all others have voucher speciemens in herbaria, two of them outside of Estonia. Altogether 242 species are frequent in Estonia, 173 species are rare, and 161 are sporadically distributed. We do not have any recent data for 20 species, and their presence in Estonia is doubtful. In 2008 a new Estonian Red list was compiled and 369 bryophyte species were evaluated against IUCN criteria. Approximately one fifth of the Estonian bryoflora (129 species) is designated to the three threat categories. Keywords: Bryoflora, frequencies of species, protected species, red list INTRODUCTION The diversity of taxa at the global or local scale taxa according to recently accepted synonyms, depends greatly on the taxonomical research. supply every taxa with a voucher specimen, The species number of bryophytes in the world estimate the present frequency in Estonia and varies between 15 000 and 20 000 (Shaw et al., give proper names in Estonian for new taxa or 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Mediterranea 26
    FLORA MEDITERRANEA 26 Published under the auspices of OPTIMA by the Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum Palermo – 2016 FLORA MEDITERRANEA Edited on behalf of the International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo by Francesco M. Raimondo, Werner Greuter & Gianniantonio Domina Editorial board G. Domina (Palermo), F. Garbari (Pisa), W. Greuter (Berlin), S. L. Jury (Reading), G. Kamari (Patras), P. Mazzola (Palermo), S. Pignatti (Roma), F. M. Raimondo (Palermo), C. Salmeri (Palermo), B. Valdés (Sevilla), G. Venturella (Palermo). Advisory Committee P. V. Arrigoni (Firenze) P. Küpfer (Neuchatel) H. M. Burdet (Genève) J. Mathez (Montpellier) A. Carapezza (Palermo) G. Moggi (Firenze) C. D. K. Cook (Zurich) E. Nardi (Firenze) R. Courtecuisse (Lille) P. L. Nimis (Trieste) V. Demoulin (Liège) D. Phitos (Patras) F. Ehrendorfer (Wien) L. Poldini (Trieste) M. Erben (Munchen) R. M. Ros Espín (Murcia) G. Giaccone (Catania) A. Strid (Copenhagen) V. H. Heywood (Reading) B. Zimmer (Berlin) Editorial Office Editorial assistance: A. M. Mannino Editorial secretariat: V. Spadaro & P. Campisi Layout & Tecnical editing: E. Di Gristina & F. La Sorte Design: V. Magro & L. C. Raimondo Redazione di "Flora Mediterranea" Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum, Università di Palermo Via Lincoln, 2 I-90133 Palermo, Italy [email protected] Printed by Luxograph s.r.l., Piazza Bartolomeo da Messina, 2/E - Palermo Registration at Tribunale di Palermo, no. 27 of 12 July 1991 ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online DOI: 10.7320/FlMedit26.001 Copyright © by International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo, Palermo Contents V. Hugonnot & L. Chavoutier: A modern record of one of the rarest European mosses, Ptychomitrium incurvum (Ptychomitriaceae), in Eastern Pyrenees, France . 5 P. Chène, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mchy Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej W Obliczu Antropogenicznych Przemian Szaty Roślinnej NR 2800 Barbara Fojcik
    Mchy Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej w obliczu antropogenicznych przemian szaty roślinnej NR 2800 Barbara Fojcik Mchy Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej w obliczu antropogenicznych przemian szaty roślinnej Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Katowice 2011 Redaktor serii: Biologia Iwona Szarejko Recenzenci Halina Bednarek-Ochyra, Jan Żarnowiec Publikacja będzie dostępna — po wyczerpaniu nakładu — w wersji internetowej: Śląska Biblioteka Cyfrowa www.sbc.org.pl Na okładce: okolice Trzyciąża (fot. B. Fojcik), wychodnia skalna na Górze Zborów (fot. A. Rostański), Syntrichia ruralis (fot. Vitěslav Plášek) Redaktor: Barbara Todos-Burny Wydawca Projektant okładki: Tomasz Gut Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Redaktor techniczny: Barbara Arenhövel ul. Bankowa 12B, 40-007 Katowice Korektor: Mirosława Żłobińska www.wydawnictwo.us.edu.pl e-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2011 by Wydanie I. Ark. druk. 14,5. Ark. wyd. 19,5. Papier Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego offset kl. III, 90 g Cena 24 zł (+VAT) Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone Łamanie: Pracownia Składu Komputerowego Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Druk i oprawa: PPHU TOTEM s.c. ISSN 0208-6336 M. Rejnowski, J. Zamiara ISBN 978-83-226-1969-8 ul. Jacewska 89, 88-100 Inowrocław Spis treści Wstęp 7 1. Ogólna charakterystyka Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej 9 1.1. Położenie i granice 9 1.2. Rzeźba terenu 10 1.3. Geologia 11 1.4. Gleby 12 1.5. Hydrografia 13 1.6. Klimat 13 1.7. Szata roślinna 14 1.8. Wpływ człowieka na stan środowiska przyrodniczego 19 2. Historia badań flory mchów Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej 23 3. Metodyka badań 25 4. Wyniki 30 4.1. Ogólna statystyka flory mchów 30 4.2. Zróżnicowanie przestrzenne muskoflory 34 4.3. Elementy geograficzne 36 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of the Bryophyte Floras of Northwest Belarus Concrete Fortification and the Carpathians
    Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 24: 23-27, 2011 BRC www.brc.amu.edu.pl DOI 10.2478/v10119-011-0025-7 Comparative analysis of the bryophyte floras of northwest Belarus concrete fortification and the Carpathians Anastasia Sakovich1 & Gennadij Rykovsky2 1Department of Botany, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, Ozheshko 22, Grodno, 230022, Republic of Belarus, e-mail: [email protected] 2V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany, Belarusian National Academy of Sciences, Academic 27, Minsk, 220072, Republic of Belarus, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The detailed research of bryophyte flora, carried out in 2008-2011 on fortifications from the times of the First World War and Second World War in Grodno district, resulted in recording 101 species, of which 95 species were true mosses (Bryophyta) and 6 species were hepatics (Marchantiophyta). Because the substratum displayed certain ecological similarity with carbonate rocks, we made comparative analysis of the species list. The total of 28 rare and very rare (in Belarus scale) bryophyte species were recorded, of which 3 species were included in the Red Data Book of Belarus; 3 species had a conser- vation status at the European level. Key words: bryophyte flora, concrete fortifications, carbonate rocks, comparative analysis 1. Introduction These constructions occur more often in the western part of the country. Older fortifications, built before the First In general, within a region, bryophyte floras retain World War (WWI), were the most interesting to us, in more ancient features than vascular floras. At the same particular the forts encircling Grodno town which are time, the mobility of bryophytes should not be under- especially extensive.
    [Show full text]
  • An Enigmatic Case in the Genus Podperaea (Hypnales
    Arctoa (2011) 20: 107-118 INTRAFAMILIAL HYBRIDIZATION IN MOSSES? AN ENIGMATIC CASE IN THE GENUS PODPERAEA (HYPNALES, BRYOPHYTA) ГИБРИДИЗАЦИЯ МЕЖДУ ПРЕДСТАВИТЕЛЯМИ РАЗНЫХ СЕМЕЙСТВ У МХОВ? ЗАГАДОЧНЫЙ СЛУЧАЙ В РОДЕ PODPERAEA (HYPNALES, BRYOPHYTA) MICHAEL S. IGNATOV1 & IRINA A. MILYUTINA2 МИХАИЛ С. ИГНАТОВ1, ИРИНА А.МИЛЮТИНА2 Abstract A new species from China, Podperaea baii, is described. In addition to morpho- logical differences from the second species of the genus, P. krylovii (Amlystegiaceae s.l.), P. baii differs in the nrITS1 sequence, which is very similar to that of the genus Herzogiella from the phylogenetically distant family Plagiotheciaceae. At the same time, nrITS2 in P. baii is much more similar to Amblystegiaceae than Plagiothe- ciaceae. This case is the first report of the putative remote hybridization in mosses. Резюме Из Китая описан новый вид, Podperaea baii, который, помимо небольших морфологических отличий от второго вида рода, P. krylovii (семейство Amlyste- giaceae s.l.), отличается еще последовательностью ITS1, которая соответствует роду Herzogiella из филогетически далекого семейства Plagiotheciaceae. При этом последовательность ITS2 у P. baii значительно более сходна с Amblystegia- ceae, нежели с Plagiotheciaceae. Данный случай является первым примером возможной отдаленной гибридазации у мхов. KEYWORDS: Bryophytes, pleurocarpous mosses, Plagiotheciaceae, Amblyste- giaceae, Podperaea, new species, China, remote hybridization, nrITS INTRODUCTION ‘compound’ teeth. This genus in its traditional The genus Podperaea was established by circumscription included species that are now Iwatsuki & Glime (1984) for one species, origi- treated in many genera: Campylium s. str., Cam- nally described as Campylium krylovii Podp. The pylophyllum, Campyliadelphus, Campylidium, strongly prorate cells and specific ‘compound’ and in addition some species were transferred teeth along leaf margin formed by upper end of to Amblystegium, Drepanocladus and Pseudo- lower cell and lower end of next upper cell, were campylium (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Flora of Hydrocarbon Deposit Sites in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug
    Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология. 2018. № 42. С. 119–139 УДК 582.32(571.121):574.24 doi: 10.17223/19988591/42/6 О.Г. Воронова1, А.П. Дьяченко2 1 Тюменский государственный университет, г. Тюмень, Россия 2 Уральский государственный педагогический университет, г. Екатеринбург, Россия Флора мхов территорий месторождений углеводородного сырья Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа Представлены данные о сборах мхов на территориях десяти месторождений углеводородного сырья Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (ЯНАО, округ), расположенных в трех природных подзонах. Коллекция мхов собрана во время инженерно-экологических изысканий с 2000 по 2011 г. По результатам обработки гербария составлен список, включающий 101 вид: в южной тундре – 70, лесотундре – 51, северной тайге – 46. В списке для всех таксонов указаны типы местообитаний с учетом распределения по ключевым участкам и субстраты. Отмечены два новых вида для ЯНАО: Campylidium sommerfeltii и Sphagnum cuspidatum, новые виды для каждой подзоны и восемь видов, известные на территории округа по единичным находкам: Dicranum scoparium, Ditrichum pusillum, Fontinalis antipyretica, Ochyraea duriuscula, Bryum elegans, B. axel-blytii, Callicladium haldanianum, Pseudocalliergon lycopodioides. Приведены гербарные этикетки для видов редких и впервые отмеченных в исследованных подзонах ЯНАО. Кратко обсуждены особенности встречаемости мхов по типам местообитаний, ключевым участкам, подзонам. Ключевые слова: природные подзоны; бриофлора; месторождения горючих ископаемых; редкие виды; Тюменская
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Flora of the Czech Republic: Updated Checklist and Red List and a Brief Analysis
    Preslia 84: 813–850, 2012 813 Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis Bryoflóra České republiky: aktualizace seznamu a červeného seznamu a stručná analýza Dedicated to the centenary of the Czech Botanical Society (1912–2012) Jan K u č e r a1, Jiří Vá ň a2 & Zbyněk H r a d í l e k3 1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branišovská 31, CZ–370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Charles University Prague, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Benátská 2, CZ–128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 3Palacký University Olomouc, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71 Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]. Kučera J., Váňa J. & Hradílek Z. (2012): Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis. – Preslia 84: 813–850. The bryoflora of the Czech Republic is analysed using an updated version of the checklist that includes recent taxonomic and nomenclatural changes. In addition, the baseline data was com- pletely revised using the IUCN 3.1 criteria. The main list includes 863 species of bryophytes (4 hornworts, 207 liverworts and 652 mosses) with 5 additional subspecies and 23 generally recog- nized varieties; 9 additional species are listed as of doubtful taxonomic status and 17 other species are evaluated as of uncertain occurrence. Of the 892 taxa evaluated, 46% qualified for inclusion in Red List categories (40 taxa in category RE, 70 in CR, 88 in EN, 93 in VU, 66 in LR-nt, 24 in DD-va and 30 in DD), while 54% are considered Least Concern (LC).
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIA BADAŃ I ROZWOJU INSTYTUTU BOTANIKI Im
    HISTORIA BADAŃ I ROZWOJU INSTYTUTU BOTANIKI im. W. SZAFERA POLSKIEJ AKADEMII NAUK (1953 – 2012) HISTORIA BADAŃ I ROZWOJU INSTYTUTU BOTANIKI im. W. SZAFERA POLSKIEJ AKADEMII NAUK (1953 – 2012) Redakcja Barbara Godzik, Konrad Wołowski Kraków 2013 Barbara Go d z i k , ko n r a d Wo ł o W s k i — Historia badań i rozwoju Instytutu Botaniki im. W. Szafera Polskiej Akademii Nauk (1953−2012) Skład tekstu − Marian Wysocki Układ i opracowanie graficzne − Ryszard Ochyra, Marian Wysocki Projekt okładki − Barbara Godzik, Ryszard Ochyra © Copyright by W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences Kraków 2013 Available from Editorial Office, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-83-62975-17-4 Druk: Drukarnia Kolejowa, ul. Bosacka 31, 31-505 Kraków, Poland Data publikacji: 15 września 2013 SPIS TREŚCI Słowo wstępne . 7 Przedmowa .................................................... 9 Preface . 11 1. Wstęp . 13 2. Pracownia Analiz Molekularnych . 39 3. Pracownia Briologii . 53 4. Zakład Ekologii . 109 5. Pracownia Fitosocjologii Leśnej . 151 6. Zakład Fykologii . 155 7. Pracownia Lichenologii . 177 8. Zakład Mykologii ........................................... 207 9. Zakład Paleobotaniki . 229 10. Zakład Systematyki i Fitogeografii Roślin Naczyniowych ........... 265 11. Zakład Zmienności Roślin .................................... 295 12. Międzynarodowe Studium Doktoranckie Nauk Przyrodniczych PAN .................................... 307 13. Biblioteka.................................................. 315 14. Dział Wydawnictw . 331 Aneks I . 343 Aneks II . 421 Wykaz pracowników naukowych IB PAN ............................ 435 SŁOWO WSTĘPNE Jubileusze, które podobno tak lubimy w Krakowie, są okazją nie tylko do świętowania, ale również do podsumowań i do spojrzenia wstecz. Takie spojrzenie potrzebne jest zwłaszcza młodszej generacji naukowców.
    [Show full text]
  • Kommentierte Liste Der Laubmoose Deutschlands
    Liste der Laubmoose Deutschlands 1 Kommentierte Liste der Laubmoose Deutschlands Jan-Peter Frahm Zusammenfassung: Es wird eine Liste der deutschen Laubmoose gegeben, in der die Gründe für zwingende nomenklatorische Änderungen als auch die Argumente für unterschiedliche taxonomische Auffassungen aufgeführt werden. I. Einleitung In den letzten 20 Jahren gab es eine Unzahl von Änderungen bei der Nomenklatur von Moosarten, besonders bei Laubmoosen. Dieses hat bei Bryologen und gerade bei Amateur-Bryologen zu Verunsicherung geführt, die darauf unterschiedlich reagieren. Entweder wird alles, was neu ist, unreflektiert übernommen und jeweils immer die jüngsten Namen als die „richtigen“ angesehen. Dies erfolgte z.B. so in den Niederlanden, wo man laufend die niederländische Standardliste anpassen musste und von einem Standard dann kaum mehr gesprochen werden kann. Andere bleiben beim Gebrauch alter Namen, was nicht unbedingt verkehrt ist, weiß man dann doch, was gemeint ist, wissen aber nicht, ob das falsch oder richtig ist. Dieser Beitrag soll Hinweise darauf geben, welchen Änderungen man folgen muss und was man übernehmen kann, warum vieles Ansichtssache ist, was von den Ergebnissen molekularer Arbeiten zu halten ist, die vielfach als „die Wahrheit“ schlechthin interpretiert werden, und was im Einzelnen hinter den vielen Änderungen steckt. Vielfach gibt es widersprüchliche Benutzungen besonders von Gattungsnamen. Soll man Eurhynchium praelongum oder Kindbergia praelonga sagen, Tortula ruralis oder Syntrichia ruralis, Orthodicranum oder Dicranum verwenden, Scleropodium oder Pseudoscleropodium? In solchen Fällen hilft es, die Gründe für diese Unterschiede zu wissen, sind es zwingende, die sich aus der Anwendung des Internationalen Codes der Botanischen Nomenklatur ergeben, oder „Geschmacksfragen“. Wenn zwei Möglichkeiten legitim sind, worin liegen die Unterschiede begründet? Die Nomenklatur verläuft nach den Regeln des Internationalen Codes der Botanischen Nomenklatur.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist and Country Status of European Bryophytes – Towards a New Red List for Europe
    ISSN 1393 – 6670 Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – towards a new Red List for Europe Cover image, outlined in Department Green Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 84 Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – towards a new Red List for Europe N.G. Hodgetts Citation: Hodgetts, N.G. (2015) Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – towards a new Red List for Europe. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 84. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. Keywords: Bryophytes, mosses, liverworts, checklist, threat status, Red List, Europe, ECCB, IUCN Swedish Speices Information Centre Cover photograph: Hepatic mat bryophytes, Mayo, Ireland © Neil Lockhart The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: [email protected] Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & R. Jeffrey © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2015 Contents (this will automatically update) PrefaceContents ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 ExecutivePreface ................................ Summary ............................................................................................................................ 2 2 Acknowledgements 2 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction 3 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]