Chapter-1 Understanding Diversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CHAPTER-1 UNDERSTANDING DIVERSITY LEARNING SHEET SOLUTIONS- 3 Q 1 to 5 to be answered orally. 1. What made the Britishers think that they could divide India easily? Ans. Britishers thought that they could divide India easily because people were different with different backgrounds. 2. In which city of India is Jallianwalla Bagh situated? Ans. Jallianwalla Bagh is situated in Amritsar. 3. What happened in Jallianwalla Bagh massacre? Ans. In the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar a British general opened fire on a large group of unarmed, peaceful people killing many and wounding even more. 4. Who protested against Britishers? Ans. Men and women, Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims, rich and poor had gathered to protest against the British. 5. Who composed the national anthem? Ans. India's national anthem was composed by Rabindranath Tagore. 6. How was the Indian flag used against the British by the people? Ans. The Indian flag was used as a symbol of protest against the British by people everywhere. 7. Who coined the phrase, “unity in diversity? Ans. It was Nehru, who coined the phrase, "unity in diversity" to describe the country. 8. Who wrote Discovery of India? Ans. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru wrote Discovery of India. 9. Do you think the term "unity in diversity" is an appropriate term to describe India? What do you think Nehru is trying to say about Indian unity in the sentence quoted above from his book The Discovery of India? (In the fair note book) Ans. It is definitely an appropriate term. Our country has a huge population with people from many different cultural backgrounds, different religions, people speaking languages and people following different traditions. Yet, this huge diverse nation is always united and moves forward on the path of progress. Nehru is trying to say that tolerance is very much ingrained in every Indian citizen. In his book The Discovery of India Jawaharlal Nehru says that Indian unity is not something imposed from the outside but rather, “It was something deeper and within its fold, the widest tolerance of belief and custom was practised and every variety acknowledged and even encouraged.” It was Nehru, who coined the phrase, “unity in diversity “to describe the country. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

India's Agendas on Women's Education
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota UST Research Online Education Doctoral Dissertations in Leadership School of Education 8-2016 The olitP icized Indian Woman: India’s Agendas on Women’s Education Sabeena Mathayas University of St. Thomas, Minnesota, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.stthomas.edu/caps_ed_lead_docdiss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Mathayas, Sabeena, "The oP liticized Indian Woman: India’s Agendas on Women’s Education" (2016). Education Doctoral Dissertations in Leadership. 81. https://ir.stthomas.edu/caps_ed_lead_docdiss/81 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at UST Research Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Education Doctoral Dissertations in Leadership by an authorized administrator of UST Research Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Politicized Indian Woman: India’s Agendas on Women’s Education A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, LEADERSHIP, AND COUNSELING OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS by Sabeena Mathayas IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF EDUCATION Minneapolis, Minnesota August 2016 UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS The Politicized Indian Woman: India’s Agendas on Women’s Education We certify that we have read this dissertation and approved it as adequate in scope and quality. We have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Dissertation Committee i The word ‘invasion’ worries the nation. The 106-year-old freedom fighter Gopikrishna-babu says, Eh, is the English coming to take India again by invading it, eh? – Now from the entire country, Indian intellectuals not knowing a single Indian language meet in a closed seminar in the capital city and make the following wise decision known.
[Show full text]
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (Also Known As the Amritsar Massacre) Was a Notorious Episode in the History of British Colonialism in India
DEBATE PACK CDP 2019-0085 (2019) | 8 April 2019 Compiled by: Jallianwala Bagh Tim Robinson Subject specialist: massacre Jon Lunn Contents Westminster Hall 1. Background 2 2. Press Articles 4 Tuesday 9 April 2019 3. Parliamentary material 6 3.1 PQs 6 2.30pm to 4.00pm 3.2 Debates 7 3.1 Early Day Motions 9 Debate initiated by Bob Blackman MP 3.2 Foreign Affairs Committee 10 4. Further reading 11 The proceedings of this debate can be viewed on Parliamentlive.tv The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number CDP 2019-0085, 8 April 2019 1. Background The 13 April 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre (also known as the Amritsar massacre) was a notorious episode in the history of British colonialism in India. Britannica provides this overview: British troops fired on a large crowd of unarmed Indians in an open space known as the Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar in the Punjab region (now in Punjab state) of India, killing several hundred people and wounding many hundreds more. It marked a turning point in India’s modern history, in that it left a permanent scar on Indo-British relations and was the prelude to Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi’s full commitment to the cause of Indian nationalism and independence from Britain.
[Show full text]
Sikh Self-Sacrifice and Religious Representation During World War I
religions Article Sikh Self-Sacrifice and Religious Representation during World War I John Soboslai Department of Religion, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave., Montclair, NJ 07043, USA; [email protected] Received: 5 January 2018; Accepted: 8 February 2018; Published: 10 February 2018 Abstract: This paper analyzes the ways Sikh constructions of sacrifice were created and employed to engender social change in the early twentieth century. Through an examination of letters written by Sikh soldiers serving in the British Indian Army during World War I and contemporary documents from within their global religious, legislative, and economic context, I argue that Sikhs mobilized conceptions of self-sacrifice in two distinct directions, both aiming at procuring greater political recognition and representation. Sikhs living outside the Indian subcontinent encouraged their fellows to rise up and throw off their colonial oppressors by recalling mythic moments of the past and highlighting the plight of colonial subjects of the British Raj. Receiving less discussion are Punjabi Sikhs who fought in British forces during the Great War and who spoke of their potential sacrifice as divinely sanctioned in service to a benevolent state. Both sides utilized religious symbolism in the hope that Sikhs would again enjoy a level of self-rule that had been lost with the arrival of the British Empire. Keywords: Sikhism; World War I; self-sacrifice; imperialism; British Raj When the British Raj gave way to the dual nation-states of India and Pakistan in 1947, the partitioning of the two was determined largely on the basis of religion. Pakistan became the home for the area’s large Muslim population, and India for its Hindus.
[Show full text]
The Institution of the Akal Takht: the Transformation of Authority in Sikh History
religions Article The Institution of the Akal Takht: The Transformation of Authority in Sikh History Gurbeer Singh Department of Religious Studies, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The Akal Takht is considered to be the central seat of authority in the Sikh tradition. This article uses theories of legitimacy and authority to explore the validity of the authority and legitimacy of the Akal Takht and its leaders throughout time. Starting from the initial institution of the Akal Takht and ending at the Akal Takht today, the article applies Weber’s three types of legitimate authority to the various leaderships and custodianships throughout Sikh history. The article also uses Berger and Luckmann’s theory of the symbolic universe to establish the constant presence of traditional authority in the leadership of the Akal Takht. Merton’s concept of group norms is used to explain the loss of legitimacy at certain points of history, even if one or more types of Weber’s legitimate authority match the situation. This article shows that the Akal Takht’s authority, as with other political religious institutions, is in the reciprocal relationship between the Sikh population and those in charge. This ﬂuidity in authority is used to explain and offer a solution on the issue of authenticity and authority in the Sikh tradition. Keywords: Akal Takht; jathedar; Sikh institutions; Sikh Rehat Maryada; Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC); authority; legitimacy Citation: Singh, Gurbeer. 2021. The Institution of the Akal Takht: The 1. Introduction Transformation of Authority in Sikh History. Religions 12: 390. https:// The Akal Takht, originally known as the Akal Bunga, is the seat of temporal and doi.org/10.3390/rel12060390 spiritual authority of the Sikh tradition.
[Show full text]
Sikh Ethnonationalism and Its Contested Articulation During Militancy in Punjab
25 Kuldip Singh: Sikh Ethnonationalism Sikh Ethnonationalism and Its Contested Articulation During Militancy in Punjab Kuldip Singh Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar _______________________________________________________________ This paper examines the evolution and construction of Sikh ethnonationalism from the beginnings of the faith to the period of militancy in Punjab in the 1980s/90s. While the militants enjoyed great community support immediately after Operation Bluestar and through the late 1980s, their version of Sikh ethnonationalism failed to resonate sustainably with the Sikh masses. In this paper, I highlight how militant violence pivoted from being politically oriented to being more indiscriminant in its targets. The Sikh masses, who eventually became victims of this violence, saw it as being at odds with Sikh values. I argue that this was the crucial reason for the militant version of Sikh ethnonationalism waning, and ultimately failing. This argument is demonstrated by examining the writings and editorials of various Sikh leaders, including some militant leaders who criticized the eventual degradation of militant violence and raised questions about its congruence with historical Sikh values and ethnonationalism. ________________________________________________________________ Introduction This paper examines the evolution and construction of Sikh ethnonationalism from the beginnings of the faith to the period of militancy in Punjab in the 1980s/90s. Specifically, it tries to answer why the particular construction of Sikh ethnonationalism espoused by the militants during the separatist movement of the 1980s/90s eventually failed to resonate with the Sikh masses of Punjab. This is an important question, considering the fact that the militants appeared to have significant community support immediately after Operation Bluestar and through the late-1980s.
[Show full text]
India Wins Freedom 16
India Wins Freedom 16 Get Set Answer the following. 1. In which year did lIndia become independent? 2. Who was the first Prime Minister of India? 3. Who was the first President of India? 4, Who composed the National Anthem of India? 5. What is our National Song? Nhe Indian National Congress of strikes and boycotts. Lala Lajpat Rai, achieved limited success during Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Bipin Chandra its early years. The leaders of the Pal (called Lal-Bal-Pal) were the three Congress at this time were known as popular leaders of the Radical group. the Moderates. Dadabhai Naoroji and is and I shall Gopal Krishna Gokhale were moderate Swaraj my birthright, leaders. They believed in pleading with have it. Bal Gangadhar Tilak the British government to bring about reforms. Gradually there grew another Partition of Bengal In 1905, the British decided to partition group within the Congress. They were called the Bengal. One Radicals. part was They wanted tohavea to oppose largely Hindu the Britishn population, strongly. while the other They were part was to 107 n lavour BAL GANGADHAR TILAK BIPIN CHANDRA PAL have a Muslim LALA LAJPAT RAl Fori rjatailed nstructions, see inside front cover. Mahatma Gandhi the peaceful satyagrahi 1883 1915 1891 2 October 1869 married to 1888 1893 returned Kasturbai Makhanji returned to India Kapadia (known to India; from South started a law born in Porbandar as 'Kasturba' Africa or 'Ba') practice (in Gujarat) went to travelled to South to Karamchand London to Africa; spent the next and Putlibai study law 21 years there ATTORNEY majority.
[Show full text]
Jallianwala Bagh Remembrance
JALLIANWALA BAGH REMEMBRANCE | CADET SASWAT KUMAR SWAIN of MUNICIPAL COLLEGE, 9 ’O’ BN ROURKELA participated in JALLIANWALA BAGH Event. Jallianwala Bagh is a historic garden and ‘memorial of national importance’ in Amritsar, India, preserved in the memory of those wounded and killed in the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre that occurred on the site on the festival of Baisakhi, 13 April 1919. It houses a museum, gallery and a number of memorial structures. The Jallianwala Bagh massacre, also known as the Amritsar massacre, took place on 13 April 1919, when Acting Brigadier- General Reginald Dyer ordered troops of the British Army to fire their rifles into a crowd of unarmed Indian civilians in Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, Punjab, killing at least 379 people and injuring over 1,200 other people. On 13 April 1919, people gathered at Jallianwala Bagh (Amritsar) to protest against the arrest of the two nationalist leaders, Satya Pal and Dr Saifuddin Kitchlew. Suddenly, a British military officer, General Dyer, entered the park with his troops. Without even giving a warning to the people to disperse, he ordered his troops fired at the unarmed crowd for ten minutes and when their ammunition was exhausted, they left. In those ten minutes, according to the estimates of the congress, about a thousand persons were killed and about 2000 wounded. The bullet marks can be still seen on the walls of the Jallianwala Bagh which is now a national memorial. There were no official data on the number of deaths during the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre. But on the official enquiry of the British revealed that there were 379 deaths and the Congress quoted more than 1000 people died in the massacre.
[Show full text]
Remembering Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
8 MARXIST Marxist, XXXV, 1, January–March 2019 K L TUTEJA Remembering Jallianwala Bagh Massacre The massacre which gave deep shock to the people of Punjab and created reverberations in the country took place on April 13, 1919 at a public meeting which was organized at Jallianwala Bagh in defiance of official proclamation banning such gatherings. About twenty thousand persons were present at the meeting. They included some people belonging to the surrounding countryside who had come to Amritsar on that day in connection with the Baisakhi festival. Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer went along with soldiers to Jallianwala Bagh where the meeting was being held. Immediately after his arrival, Dyer ordered his troops to fire. No warning was given, nor was the crowd asked to disperse. The firing continued for ten minutes; in all 1650 rounds were fired. Dyer ordered fire to be focused where crowd was thickest including the exits. He gave orders to stop firing only when his ammunition was virtually exhausted. According to an official account, 379 persons were killed and 1200 wounded. However the official figure is very much on the lower side; the number of casualties was actually much higher. The massacre invoked sharp criticism both in England and India. For instance Winston Churchill who later became the Prime Minister in England called it ‘a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation.’ In fact, such kind of responses indicate that even those who believed that the British government in India was based on justice were shocked and disturbed. Remembering Jallianwala Bagh Massacre 9 In India, a large number of people felt that it was a gruesome event unparalleled in history.
[Show full text]
'One Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Rounds': Colonial Violence in The
Indi@logs Vol 1 2014, pp. 38-50, ISSN: 2339-8523 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ‘OE THOUSAD SIX HUDRED AD FIFTY ROUDS ’: C OLOIAL VIOLECE I THE REPRESETATIOS OF THE JALLIAWALA BAGH MASSACRE JOEL KUORTTI University of Turku [email protected] Received: 16-09-2013 Accepted: 23-11-2013 ABSTRACT The Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar in 1919 paved the way for the independence of India and Pakistan. The paper looks at the narrative strategies of representing the incident in two novels that recount it, Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children and Shauna Singh Baldwin’s What the Body Remembers . How do these texts engage with the colonial political situation? How do the two writers see the repercussions of the incident for the time of their narratives? KEYWORDS : Salman Rushdie; Shauna Singh Baldwin; Jallianwala Bagh massacre; colonial politics; narrative strategies; representation RESUME ‘Mil seiscientas cincuenta balas’. La violencia colonial en las representaciones de la masacre de Jallianwala Bagh La masacre de Jallianwala Bagh en Amritsar en 1919 allanó el camino hacia la independencia de India y Pakistán. Este artículo examina las estrategias narrativas empleadas en la representación de este suceso en dos novelas que lo describen: Midnight’s Children de Salman Rushdie y What the Body Remembers de Shauna Singh Baldwin. ¿Cómo abordan estas novelas la situación política colonial? ¿Cómo perciben estos escritores las repercusiones de este suceso en el contexto histórico de la narrativa? PALABRAS CLAVE : Salman Rushdie; Shauna Singh Baldwin; masacre de Jallianwala Bagh; política colonial; estrategias narrativas; representación The Road to Jallianwala Bagh – The Historical Context After the Great War of 1914–1918, the British faced grave problems in subduing growing resistance in India.
[Show full text]
The Indian Independence Struggle (1930 – 1931)
The Indian Independence Struggle (1930 – 1931) Lester R. Kurtz, Ph.D* June 2009 Summary of events related to the use or impact of civil resistance ©2009 International Center on Nonviolent Conflict Disclaimer: Hundreds of past and present cases of nonviolent conflict exist. To make these cases more accessible, the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict (ICNC) is compiling summaries of them on an ongoing basis. Each summary aims to provide a clear perspective on the role that nonviolent civil resistance has played or is playing in a particular case. The following is authored by someone who has expertise in this particular region of the world and/or expertise in the field of nonviolent conflict. The author speaks with his/her own voice, so the conflict summary below does not necessarily reflect the views of ICNC. If you would like to suggest a conflict that you feel should be summarized and included on ICNC's website, please contact us at [email protected] and let us know. *Lester R. Kurtz is a Professor at the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at George Mason University. ©2009 International Center on Nonviolent Conflict | 1 Conflict Summary: Mohandas Gandhi’s civil disobedience movement of 1930-1931—launched by the Salt March— is a critical case for understanding civil resistance. Although by itself it failed to bring Indian independence, it seriously undermined British authority and united India’s population in a movement for independence under the leadership of the Indian National Congress (INC). It further signaled a new stage in the struggle for Indian swaraj (self-rule) and facilitated the downfall of the British Empire in India.
[Show full text]
The Nehru Family and Its Imprint on Modern India 7Th Lecture by Mrs V L Pandit 12 June 1975
The Nehru Family and its Imprint on Modern India 7th Lecture by Mrs V L Pandit 12 June 1975 Mrs Pandit began her lecture by describing her own position as a member of the Nehru family. This gave her the benefit of a special insight into Nehru’s formative years and his early involvement in the politics of Indian Independence. Mrs Pandit continued: Being his sister, I have shared the same home background and though the difference in our ages of eleven years separated us for long periods while he was at school and university in England, his personality made a deep impact on me. I tried to copy him in everything; it was my ambition to be like him. As the years passed and our family became involved in the freedom struggle I worked with him and the countless others who formed Gandhi’s non-violent army during the years between 1920 and 1974. Nothing cements a relationship so firmly as to share ideals and face a common challenge, and it was during the early beginnings of the movement in 1921-22 that we began to grow closer to each other and I was able to understand something of the conflict in his mind. His final identification with the non-violent movement was reached after a long and bitter inner struggle. In his own autobiography he dismisses it lightly and those who have written about him have not known him well enough to understand one of the most important periods of his life. I would like to talk to you this evening about the man who later became Prime Minister of India - about the home in which he grew up and of the impact that home made on the social and political patterns of the time.
[Show full text]
Martial Law and Massacre: Violence and the Limit
Chapter 4 Martial Law and Massacre: Violence and the Limit In Amritsar, 13 April 1919 was a day marked by the heat and dust char- acteristic of the Punjab at that time of the year. General Dyer, who had been in the city since 11 April, spent the morning marching round the city, reading a proclamation forbidding the residents from leaving the city or gathering in processions or assemblies. By 1:00 P.M., however, finding the weather too hot, he returned to his headquarters. Soon after, he received reports that an alternative procession during the morning was announcing a gathering at Jallianwala Bagh at 4:30 P.M. The city was observing the fourth consecutive day of Hartal or general strike, and there were funerals being held for people shot by the mili- tary on 10 April. Adding to this tension was the fact that many people had come into the city from out of town, as it was the day of the Baisakhi festival—the Hindu New Year. It is estimated that by the after- noon some twenty thousand people had assembled in the bagh, some in open defiance of General Dyer’s proclamation, but others merely in the spirit of the festival, as the bagh was adjacent to the holy Golden Temple. By 4:00 P.M. General Dyer received information that the meet- ing was being held and immediately set out with his troops and armored vehicles.1 Jallianwala Bagh was actually not a park or garden at all, but an unused ground in the shape of an irregular rectangle about 250 yards long and 200 yards wide.
[Show full text]