DOCSLIB.ORG

Rivista N. 07-08.1988

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rivista N. 07-08.1988 CAMPIONATO ITALIANO COPPIE MISTE 1998 CHIUSURA ISCRIZIONI PER TUTTI I PARTECIPANTI ALLA FASE LOCALE/REGIONALE: 25 settembre 1998 PER LE COPPIE AVENTI DIRITTO ALLA FASE DI FINALE NAZIONALE: 25 settembre 1998 QUOTE ISCRIZIONE e PRESTITI La quota iscrizione per le coppie partecipanti alla fase locale/regionale è di lire 120.000 da inviare ai Comitati Regionali di competenza. Gli eventuali prestiti delle coppie iscritte alla fase locale/provinciale sono classificati come prestiti regionali (lire 50.000) se effettuati tra Società della stessa Regione, diventano invece Prestiti Nazionali se effettuati tra Società di diversa Regione. Le coppie promosse dalla fase locale/regionale alla fase Finale Nazionale integreranno la loro iscrizione (lire 80.000) direttamente a SALSOMAGGIORE TERME il giorno 30 ottobre 1998 al momento della conferma della partecipazione. La quota iscrizione per le coppie aventi diritto alla fase di Finale Nazionale è di lire 200.000 da inviare assieme agli elenchi delle formazioni alla segreteria FIGB - via C. Menotti 11/C-20129 MILANO (Sez. Campionati e Tornei) entro la data di chiusura delle iscrizioni. Le coppie non confermate entro il 25 settembre 1998 perderanno il diritto alla partecipazione alla fase Finale Nazionale. Gli eventuali prestiti delle coppie aventi diritto alla fase di Finale Nazionale sono Prestiti Nazionali. DATE DI SVOLGIMENTO Fase Locale/Regionale: a cura dei Comitati Regionali, entro il 25 ottobre 1998. Fase Finale Nazionale: Salsomaggiore Terme dal 30 ottobre all’1 novembre 1998. ELENCHI DELLE COPPIE AVENTI DIRITTO ALLA FASE NAZIONALE F0006 GOLIN-PULGA F0152 LEONARDI-LEONARDI F0218 BELLADONNA-VECCHIARELLI F0404 TAMBASCIA-TAMBASCIA F0011 STUCCHI-GIULIANO F0152 POZZI-ROSENFELD F0218 BETTIOL-GIGLI F0411 GASPARINI-LOMBARDI F0020 NOTO-VERNOLA F0152 ROSTI-GHEZZI F0218 BONAVOGLIA-FUSARI F0411 LOMBARDI-LOMBARDI F0022 MENDITTO-CAJANO F0152 ZULLI-COLOMBO F0218 MAGGIO-FRANCISCI F0411 VIARO-FROLLO F0022 TOTARO-TOTARO F0162 ARNABOLDI-ARRIGONI F0218 MARANI-MAFFEI F0416 PAOLUZI-MEDUGNO F0030 LOLLI-BUZZONI F0164 CAPALDI-LIGNOLA F0218 RIZZUTI-D’APICE F0417 MONTIGUARNIERI-CASTIGNANI F0030 MANCON-FILIPPIN F0164 CUCCORESE-DE BIASIO F0218 SANTOLINI-SANTOLINI F0418 GULLOTTA-STUFFI F0038 BARONI-FRATI F0164 D’ANDREA-COMACCHI F0218 SCRIATTOLI-CAPRIATA F0423 FIMIANI-AZZONI F0038 CIVALLERI-RAVASI F0164 MASSAROLI-FERRARA F0218 VITALE-MARZI F0423 PAGANI-ZANINOTTI F0038 PATELLI-RIZZO F0164 SQUILLANTE-MANGONI F0229 VENNI-FEDELE F0424 ZUCCHINI-PECCI F0058 ATTANASIO-MANARA F0171 CAPPERI-CAPPERI F0236 CITTOLIN-PIZZA F0430 PILI-PINTO F0058 DI LENTINI-MANARA F0171 CARMIGNANI-MONARI F0237 CLAVA-BRAITO F0440 DI BELLO-GIGLIOTTI F0066 ZOFFOLI-POLLINI F0171 CITTADINI-CATTANI F0237 INÌ-TOLETTI F0440 GUARIGLIA-GUARIGLIA F0073 FERRAMOSCA-TOLOMEI F0174 BOZZI-SERCHI F0266 MARCHETTI-LA ROSA F0445 GRECO-CIOFANI F0079 CHIZZOLI-DOSSENA F0174 CENTIOLI-DE LUCCHI F. F0266 ROSSANO -VIVALDI F0445 RICCIOLETTI-COTTONE F0095 CORCHIA-MATRICARDI F0178 BELFIORE-BELFIORE F0274 CALOGERÀ-TOSOLIN F0447 BALLARATI-RUGGERI F0096 SCULLIN-MAESTRI F0178 TONTI-ALBAMONTE F0274 COSMARO-PIACENTINI F0447 PROFETI-LA CASCIA F0098 FORTI-CACCAMO F0179 AZZOLINI-CIOTTI F0274 DE SARIO-CIVIDIN F0451 MARCEDDU-MEDUSEI F0098 GIACOMAZZI-DANESI F0190 CALDARELLI-MORELLI F0288 TRAGHIN-URBANI F0454 TANTINI-TANTINI F0098 MARIANI-BURATTI F0194 RICCIARELLI-RICCIARELLI F0300 D’AGOSTINO-LONGHI F0459 CEDOLIN-CANESI F0098 MARINI-CONTE F0200 CASTELLANI-RONCHI F0318 CAUSA-ROSSI F0459 RUSSO-ROMANI F0108 BOZZO-MARINO F0210 BINI-CECCONI F0329 DELLA GHERARDESCA-STELLONI F0462 MAZZADI-VALSEGA F0108 LAVAGGI-NICOLODI F0214 POLIMENI-MUROLO F0403 GAGLIARDI-CAPALDI F0714 BRUGGIA-GROSSO F0130 BRAMBILLA F.-FRANCO F0214 SALNITRO-POLIMENI F0403 GARDINO-CORTI F0136 CARDENAS-AGRILLO F0216 ANCESCHI-FERRARI F0403 MARTUCCI-MOTTA F0152 BURALI-CAMPINI F0216 FORNACIARI-VANDELLI F0404 LOMBARDI-BARACCHI CAMPIONATO ITALIANO SQUADRE MISTE 1998-DIVISIONE NAZIONALE “TROFEO MIRAGE” PRIMA SERIE: (Salsomaggiore 19/22 novembre 1998) F0098 ASS. FIRENZE BRIDGE F0174 ASS. PADOVA BRIDGE SS. F0237 G.S. MALASPINA PESCHIERA F0150 ASS. BRIDGE MESSINA F0216 ASS. BR. REGGIO EMILIA F0460 G.S. ASS. FRANCESCA TO F0152 ASS. MILANO BRIDGE F0218 ASS. ROMANA BRIDGE [2] F0462 BRIDGE CLUB PARMA SECONDA SERIE: (Salsomaggiore 20/22 novembre 1998) F0030 A.SP. BRIDGE BOLOGNA [4] F0210 BRIDGE CLUB PRATO F0412 C.LO PAVIA BR. CLUB F0032 ASS. BR. BOLZANO F0216 ASS. BR. REGGIO EMILIA F0416 C.LO BRIDGE ROMA [2] F0095 A. FERMO-P.TO-S. GIORGIO F0218 ASS. ROMANA BRIDGE [2] F0423 A. CANOTTIERI OLONA MI F0152 ASS. MILANO BRIDGE F0272 ASS. TREVISO BRIDGE F0430 GR. SP. IDEA BRIDGE TO F0164 ASS. NAPOLI BRIDGE [2] F0274 C.LO BRIDGE TRIESTE F0462 BRIDGE CLUB PARMA F0178 ASS. BR. PALERMO F0403 G.S. ASSO BRIDGE TO F0474 BRIDGE CLUB SANREMO TERZA SERIE: (Salsomaggiore 20/22 novembre 1998) F0011 C.LO BRIDGE VILLASANTA F0178 ASS. BR. PALERMO F0300 ASS. BR. VITERBO F0020 ASS. BRIDGE BARI F0190 ASS. PESCARA BRIDGE F0403 G.S. ASSO BRIDGE TO [3] F0026 ASS. BRIDGE BERGAMO F0194 ASS. BRIDGE PIACENZA F0404 A.B. BOCCIOFILA GE F0038 ASS. BRIDGE BRESCIA F0200 ASS. BRIDGE PISA F0407 ASS. BR. COSENZA F0044 ASS. BR. CAGLIARI F0210 BRIDGE CLUB PRATO F0411 A. BR. NINO MARCON VE F0058 ASS. SP. CATANIA [2] F0213 ASS. RECANATI BRIDGE F0413 A.BR. MOTOCLUB MI F0076 ASS. COMO BRIDGE F0218 ASS. ROMANA BRIDGE [6] F0417 C.LO DELLA VELA AN [2] F0098 ASS. FIRENZE BRIDGE [3] F0229 AS. BOLOGNA-RASTIGNANO F0418 ASS. ROMA TOP BRIDGE F0108 G.S. GENOVA BRIDGE [2] F0237 G.S. MALASPINA PESCHIERA F0440 BRIDGE CLUB PETRARCA NA [3] F0130 ASS. BR. LECCO SOC. [2] F0248 ASS. SIENA BRIDGE [2] F0445 BRIDGE CLUB 3A ROMA F0132 ASS. BR. LEGNANO F0262 AS. TERAMO BRIDGE F0447 ASS. SP. ROMA EUR [2] F0136 S. STANZE CIVICHE LI F0266 G.S. BRIDGE TORINO F0454 S.S.B. TENNIS CLUB PERUGIA [2] F0152 ASS. MILANO BRIDGE [4] F0272 ASS. TREVISO BRIDGE F0459 BRIDGERAMA MILANO [3] F0164 ASS. NAPOLI BRIDGE [4] F0276 C.LO BR. CITTÀ DI UDINE F0462 C.LO BRIDGE PARMA F0174 ASS. PADOVA BRIDGE SS. F0280 ASS. BR. VARESE F0464 A. BR. QUADRIFOGLIO CA Composizione delle squadre: le squadre potranno essere composte al massimo da 6 giocatori più un eventuale capitano non giocatore che dovrà essere comunicato all’atto dell’iscrizione. Scadenza delle iscrizioni: 16 ottobre 1998. Quota di iscrizione: lire 390.000. Invio formazioni: gli elenchi delle formazioni vanno inviati alla Segreteria FIGB - via C. Menotti 11/C- 20129 MILANO (Sez. Campionati e Tornei). Composizione dei gironi della Divisione Nazionale: il sorteggio per la composizione dei gironi e la for- mazione dei tabelloni della serie Nazionale si effettuerà presso la sede FIGB il giorno 30 ottobre 1998 alle ore 11.00. Possono presenziare i Presidenti degli affiliati interessati o loro delegati autorizzati. Prestiti: i moduli ed il pagamento di eventuali prestiti andranno inviati alla Segreteria FIGB via C. Menotti 11/C - 20129 MILANO (sez. Campionati e Tornei) in alle- gato agli elenchi e quote di iscrizione. N U M E R O 7/8 Gianarrigo Rona Editoriale 2 Franco Broccoli Punti di vista 5 Nino Ghelli Tuttolibri 6 C R O N A C A Franco Broccoli Campionati Assoluti a Squadre Libere e Signore 8 Ciro Calza 3ª Serie Open 31 Anna Maria Torlontano Ladies Bridge Jamborée 36 V I T A F E D E R A L E Dino Mazza Club Azzurro 42 T E C N I C A Pietro Forquet Passo a passo 46 Nino Ghelli Convention Corner 49 Giuliano De Angelis Fiori Forte? 52 Bridge d’Italia Frank Stewart Il mio Bridge e il Vostro 56 Rivista mensile della R U B R I C H E Federazione Italiana Gioco Bridge Dino Mazza Accade all’estero 58 Numero 7/8 Luglio/Agosto 1998 V A R I E T À Abbonamento gratuito Soluzioni e Classifiche Concorso Licitativo Valtur 62 per i tesserati F.I.G.B. D O C U M E N T I Direttore Editoriale Giudice Arbitro Nazionale 68 Gianarrigo Rona Corte Federale d’Appello 76 Direttore Responsabile Franco Broccoli Notiziario Affiliati 79 Segretario Editoriale Calendario agonistico 80 Niki Di Fabio Comitato di redazione Carlo Arrighini, Giancarlo Bernasconi, Nino Ghelli, Giorgio Granata, Romano Grazioli, Romano Pacchiarini. Direzione e redazione Via C. Menotti, 11 - scala C - 20129 Milano Telefono 02/70000483 r.a. - Telefax 02/70001398 http://www.federbridge.it e-mail: [email protected] Videoimpaginazione Romano Pacchiarini ([email protected]) Progetto grafico Giorgio Granata Stampa Tipografia Pi-Me Editrice s.r.l. Viale Sardegna, 64 - 27100 Pavia Telefono 0382/539124 - Telefax 0382/22485 Autorizzazione del Tribunale di Milano Per la pubblicità: N. 2939 del 7 gennaio 1953 La tiratura di questo numero è stata di 12.000 copie Segreteria Generale Spedizione in abbonamento postale, Via C. Menotti, 11/C 45% art. 2, comma 20 B, Legge 662/96 - 20129 Milano Milano Telefono 02/70000483 r.a. - Fax 02/70001398 Finito di stampare il 6 luglio 1998 e-mail [email protected] C R O N A C A Editoriale Cari Amici, ti del Management oggi due sono italiani. Un fatto assoluta- a chiusura della prima parte dell’annata federale e prima mente nuovo, mai successo per il passato, che rappresenta una delle ferie ho chiesto spazio al Direttore per annotare qualche gratificazione di dimensioni enormi per la Federazione Italiana osservazione sull’andamento delle nostre cose, tali e tante esse Gioco Bridge, fors’anche superiore ai meriti acquisiti, ma vera e sono e tutte, a mio sommesso avviso, importanti e coinvolgen- tangibile. Una gratificazione infatti che va aldilà della valuta- ti. zione personale dei singoli, che indubbiamente ha una sua pro- Consentitemi di fare un brevissimo excursus della più recen- pria valenza, ma che comunque è filtrata attraverso il peso spe- te storia federale (anche se le vicende sono note ai più mi sem- cifico della struttura nazionale che li esprime. E a tal proposito bra giusta e opportuna una rinfrescatina, per la memoria dei va ben sottolineato che 40 sono le Federazioni che aderiscono “vecchi” e per la conoscenza dei “nuovi”). Il periodo 1978-1986 alla E.B.L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
    this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple Strong Pass System George Cuppaidge Sept 2012 Jorj41
    A Simple Strong Pass System ♠♥♦♣ George Cuppaidge Sept 2012 [email protected] It is such a simple concept, use the cheapest action of all to show a good hand. Give your side as much room as possible to find the ideal spot. You can play it at world championship level but you must practice it in a vacuum as many sponsoring organizations worldwide have, effectively, banned it. Strange! It has so many, self-evident advantages. Here are some. Pass, unlike a strong 1C or 2C, does not supplant a natural bid, so those vital bids are free to use in a natural sense. Knowing when your side holds the balance of power is fundamental. In this system, or any system, you must be able to announce that you hold the magic number, 10 points, or more. The system strong pass does just this. Presently pass shows say 0-9 points, an opening bid 10+ points (My own preference, see immediately above.) Why not take the opportunity, and the bidding space, to announce the same point range but your longest suit as well? Fit is important, sometimes it is all important. Knowing that you are facing length in a particular suit can often allow instant re-evaluation upwards. Sometimes, simply by showing a suit you will find a game when other players were never in the bidding. When the longest suit in any hand is made trumps, value is added to that hand. Often, your first chance will be your only chance to describe your hand. There is no need to alter your preemptive bidding structure, usually the bids from 2D upwards.
    [Show full text]
  • EARLY EUROPEAN TRA -\Rellers in 'L'de NAGPUR TERRITORIES • Early European Travellers in the Nagpur Territories
    EARLY EUROPEAN TRA_-\rELLERS IN 'l'DE NAGPUR TERRITORIES • Early European Travellers in the Nagpur Territories Reprinted· from Old Records NAG PUR: PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRESS 1930 [Price-Three Rupees.] 'Agents fol' the sale of Publications issued bJI the Central Provinces Government. ", ·~ [NOTE.-Appointments oLall official Agents in the United Kingdom and on the Continent for the sale of Government l'ublications have been terminated with effect from the 1st April 1925. - AU publications in future are obtainable either direct frcm the High Commissioner for India, India House Aldwych, London, W. C. 2, or through any bookseller.] INDIA. AKOLA: JUBBULPORE: Jhe Proprietor, Shri Ramdas The .1\-lannger, General Book Stores, Tajnapeth. Depot. ALLAHABAD: KARACHI: Mr. Ram Narain Lal, Publisher, ! 1 he· Standard Bookstall. etc., l, Bank Road KHANDWA: The Superintendent, Nazair Kanun The r'roprietor, >hri Ramdas Stores. Hir.d Press. Khandwa Hranch. LAHORE: M1RAOTI: Rai Sahib M. Guiab Singh & • Thakur & Co., Booksellers. Sons. BARODA: LUCKNOW: Mr. M. C. Kothari, Bookseller and 'lhe Proprietor, Newal Kisho.e Publisher, Raopura Road. Press. ' The Upper India Publishing lHLASPUR: House, Ltd , 41, Aminabud Mr. M. A. Subhan, Book~>eller Park. and Publisher. MADRAS: U0MHAY: Higginbotham & Co. D. B. Taraporevala, Sons & Co., S. Murthy & Co., Post Box 190, Hornby Road, Fort. No. 152. Radhnbn: A tmaram Sagoon. The Proprietor, The City Book Sunder Pandurang, 25, Kalbadevi Co., Post Box No. 283. Road. ~AG?Ui<: Thacker & Co., Ltd. Aidan Binzani, Proprietors, Kar­ CALCUTTA: mavir !:look Depot, Mahal The Book Company. 4/4-A, Mr. G. G. Khot, Walker Road. College Street. Mr. G. A.
    [Show full text]
  • A British Rifle Man; the Journals and Correspondence of Major George Simmons, Rifle Brigade, During the Peninsular War and the C
    c^^'^«kiirMlANCA • J; VITTORIA 1? WATCRIOO- THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES -^ Fairfield Secondary School, AWARD. Name .Jfi^,I^..W*4*Vv*<^-.. Form J^^. Subject :^^/&y. tcJ'J^. Date ^\.'. l?|l*f Principal. A BRITISH RIFLE MAN A BRITISH RIFLE MAN THE JOURNALS AND CORRESPONDENCE OF MAJOR GEORGE SIMMONS, RIFLE BRIGADE, DURING THE PENINSULAR WAR AND THE CAMPAIGN OF WATERLOO EDITED, WITH INTRODUCTION, BY LIEUT.-COLONEL WILLOUGHBY VERNER LATE RIFLE BRIGADE AUTHOR OF ' SKETCHES IN THE SOUDAN,' ETC. WITH THREE MAPS LONDON A. & C. BLACK, SOHO SQUARE 1899 All rights reserved DC S^rih To GENERAL HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUKE OF CONNAUGHT AND STRATHEARN, COLONEL-IN-CHIEF OF THE RIFLE BRIGADE, FORMERLY (1803-1816) STYLED THE 95TH RIFLES AND (1800-1802) THE RIFLE CORPS, THIS VOLUME IN WHICH A BRITISH RIFLE MAN RECOUNTS HIS PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF MANY OF THE DEEDS THAT HAVE MADE THE NAME OF THE REGIMENT SO FAMOUS IS (by permission) dedicated BY HIS MOST HUMBLE AND OBEDIENT SERVANT WILLOUGHBY VERNER, LIEUTENANT-COLONEL, LATE OF THE RIFLE BRIGADE. 821450 SKETCH MAPS Illustrating the operations on the Coa and Agueda ....... Facing page 198 Illustrating movements during the Campaigns of 1809-12 ......,,„ 272 Illustrating movements during the Campaigns ofi8i3-i4 „ „ 350 CONTENTS Introduction ....... Page xi Commencement of the Peninsular War. Cam- paign OF 1808 ....... I Campaign of 1809 ....... 2 CHAPTER I Letter No. I., To his Parents, from Hythc and Dover, dated 21st May 1809 — Journal, May-July 1809 — Letter No. IL, To his Parents, from Castello Branco, dated i8th July 1809 4 CHAPTER II Journal, July-December 1809—Letter No.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Leads the 2006 NEC Cup
    Thursday, February 9, 2006 Bulletin Number 3 Editors: Eric Kokish, Richard Colker Israel Leads the 2006 NEC Cup With two strong wins and a medium loss, the Israeli team (Israel Yadlin, Doron Yadlin, Michael Barel, Migry Campanile), with 123 VPs, has taken the lead in the 2006 NEC Cup. Tied for second place, only 4 IMPs back, are the WBF (French) Women (Bénédicte Cronier, Sylvie Willard, Catherine d'Ovidio, Daniele Gaviard) and YOI (Chen Dawei, Kazuo Furuta, Masayuki Ino, Tadashi Imakura, Yoshiyuki Nakamura, Yasuhiro Shimizu), both with119 VPs. In fourth place with 115 VPs is the USA/Kasle team and in fifth place with 113 VPs are the Italians. The Paul Hackett team, who held the lead at the end of Day 1, suffered three losses to fall to a tie for ninth/tenth place. The complete rankings are shown below while individual results of the first three matches are on page 4. NEC Cup: Standings After Day Two (Six Matches) Rank Team VPs Rank Team VPs Rank Team VPs 1 ISRAEL 123 15/17 SKOTII 96 29/31 Sweet Briar 79 2/3 WBF Women (Fr.) 119 15/17 HANA 96 29/31 BIRD 79 2/3 YOI 119 15/17 Happy Koro 96 29/31 KinKi 79 4 USA/Kasle 115 18 SLAM DUNK 95 32/33 MERRY QUEENS 76 5 Italy 113 19/20 Magnolia 92 32/33 Kimura@Yokohama 76 6 OzOne-Del’Monte 110 19/20 JAPAN YAMADA 92 34 Charade 74 7 USA/Mahaffey 109 21 SARA 89 35 XYZ 72 8 FISK 108 22 Fairy Tale 88 36 Sun Flowers 71 9/10 Paul Hackett 102 23 NAITO 87 37 CACTI (Korea) 70 9/10 South America 102 24/25 GIRASOL 86 38/39 LBH 69 11 Estrellas 101 24/25 PS-Jack 86 38/39 Japan Youth 69 12/13 USA/Mori 99 26 ESPERANZA 84 40 HYLII (Korea) 66 12/13 TAJIMA 99 27 Makko 82 41 Solaris 59 14 OzOne-Neill 97 28 MY-Bridge 80 42 Kuznun Karas 26 NEC Cup Bridge Festival on the Web Follow the action at the 11th NEC Cup Bridge Festival by surfing to: http://bridge.cplaza.ne.jp/necfest.html – or – http://www.jcbl.or.jp Follow our featured matches on Vugraph each day at: www.bridgebase.com NEC Cup 2006: Conditions of Contest An 8-round Swiss, qualifying the top 8 teams to the Knockout phase; no playbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Bid Outside the Box
    Bid Outside the Box Jan Eric Larsson Today’s bidding systems have grown from When our side is weaker. the early days of contract bridge. Most of When the deal is fairly equal in strength. the time, you try to exchange information When there are wilder distributions. about high cards and distribution while naming plausible final contracts. Let us look at each of these situations and see what first principles we would wish for West East in a bidding system. 1h1 1s2 2s3 4s4 Our Side is Stronger First assume that our side holds most of the 1) “I think I can make one heart.” high card strength, and that the distributions 2) “I have spades.” are reasonably balanced, (or at least not 3) “If so we can make two spades.” extreme). 4) “Then we can make four spades.” In this case we want to conduct precise and Of course, many conventions and artificial constructive bidding to find the correct part bids have been invented, but the basis score, game, or slam. At the same time, we remains. Most bids show extra length or do not want to give away more information strength and name a potential final contract. than necessary to the defense. I propose the In the sequence above, 1s is the only following principles, (nothing new here). forcing bid. Keep Low with Strong Hands What would be the result if we tried first to In constructive bidding, we need to preserve formulate general principles for what a bidding space and keep the level low. Each bidding system should accomplish, and then extra bid gives us twice as many sequences designed the system from scratch, based on to use in the search for the best contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention Card Editor
    BASIC RESPONSES AUSTRALIAN BRIDGE FEDERATION Jump raises - minors limit forcing Other: not applicable INCORPORATED © Jump raises - majors limit forcing Other: not applicable STANDARD SYSTEM CARD Jump shifts after minor opening not applicable Names: Michael Bausor Rhys Cooper Jump shifts after major opening not applicable ABF Nos: 726222 726257 Responses to strong 2 suit opening not applicable Basic System:Forcing Pass with relays Brown Sticker Responses to 2NT opening 3A strong others play or correct Classification: Green Blue Red Yellow PLAY CONVENTIONS OPENING BIDS 'NT' Versus Notrump 'S' Versus Suit = Both Describe strength, minimum length, or specific meaning Canape Sequence leads: Overlead all All except AK x (x) 1A 4+ C 8-12 pts 1B 4+D8-12 pts<4C 1C 0-7 pts any shape 1D flat8-12pts<4CD Underlead Other: 1 NT 5+/4+ minors 8-12 pts may contain 5 card major Four or more with an honour 4th highest attitude 2A Stayman: simple extended Other: invitational+ relay 3rd/5th Other: Transfers 2B N/A 2C N/A 2D N/A From 4 small 2nd highest Other: 3rd/5th 2 NTN/A Other: From 3 cards (no honour) top middle bottom 2A 6+ 8-12 pts Signal on partner's lead: high encourage low encourage 2B 6+ 8-12 pts Other: Natural count Mckenny overtones 2C 5+/5+ colour 9-12pts Signal on declarer's lead Natural count Mckenny overtones 2D 5+/5+ rank 9-12pts Discards McKenney high encourage low encourage 2 NT 5+/5+ shape 9-12pts odd/even Other: Natural count Mckenny overtones 3 NT specific ace ask Count natural reverse PRE-ALERTS: CALLS THAT MAY HAVE UNEXPECTED MEANING/S
    [Show full text]
  • Orbis Bermuda Bowl Both the Orbis Bermuda Bowl and the Orbis Venice Cup Feature Tight Races for the Top Eight Qualifying Spots
    Thursday, 13 January 2000 Jean Paul Meyer, Co-ordinator Mark Horton, Editor Brent Manley & Brian Senior,Assistant Editors Issue: 6 Stelios Hatzidakis, Layout Editor Race for the eighth! Orbis Bermuda Bowl Both the Orbis Bermuda Bowl and the Orbis Venice Cup feature tight races for the top eight qualifying spots. Play in the quarterfinal stages of both events begins on Saturday. Each team has five more chances to make the cut. Indonesia, which had slipped to third place after two losses on Wednesday, had a huge 14th round against one of the other strong contenders in the Orbis Bermuda Bowl to regain first place in the round-robin standings. In the Orbis Bermuda Bowl, Indonesia routed Poland, 53-14, to surge back into first place with 256 Victory Points, just three ahead of second-place USA 1. Right behind the Americans are Norway with 250 VPs, followed by Poland with 242. Indonesia lost earlier in the day to Italy, 56-29, and to Brazil, 37-31. USA 1 was clobbered by Poland in the first match of the day, 73-32, but came back with victories against South Africa, 68-43, and Sweden, 44-31. Orbis Venice Cup In the Orbis Venice Cup, Denmark's lead of 23 VPs starting play Wednesday was whittled to 3 after two losses and a narrow victory.After 14 matches, the Danes had 268 VPs to 265 for second-place Austria. France was within striking distance at 262 and USA 1 was close with 259. Top Geir! Denmark edged Canada, 41-37, to start off Wednesday, but dropped their next two matches, losing to The Netherlands, 47-33, and to Argentina, 45-32.
    [Show full text]
  • EBL Standard Card Notes
    Supplementary notes file (European Standard Card) Note:..1: Two-over-one Responses: 1D-2C and 1M-2x A 2/1 response is forcing-to-game except where responder rebids his suit simply after opener has not promised extra values. Thus: 1D-2C; 2D-3D and 1D-2C; 3C are forcing. Note:..2: Jump shifts (JS) A simple jump-shift response shows an extra value opening bid (16+HCP) with a strong suit (at least 5 cards, 2/3 top honors) and one of three hand-types: 1) long one-suiter 2) good support 3) balanced or near-balanced Note:..3: 1m - 2m: Opener can: (1) play in 3m by bidding it (2) bid 2NT, nonforcing (NF) (3) bid a new suit, then stop in 3m Note:..4: Opener's Splinter Raise Opener's rebid 1 level above either a jump shift or a forcing reverse is a game-forcing splinter raise. Note:..5: 1m - 2NT: Opener's 3m is nonforcing, new suits are forcing. Note:..6: Reverses After a one-level suit response, opener’s reverse is forcing and promises a rebid below game. The partnership will reach at least game unless responder’s next bid is two of his original suit and the cheaper of a fourth-suit bid and two notrump (which are initially defined as preludes to a signoff. In the potentially weak sequences opener, if he can’t choose a game contract, can force to game artificially by bidding the fourth suit. With less than game-going values, opener can raise responder’s rebid suit (suggesting strong two-card support), bid two notrump, or rebid his first suit.
    [Show full text]
  • It's a Knockout!
    Saturday, 15 January 2000 Jean Paul Meyer, Co-ordinator Mark Horton, Editor Brent Manley & Brian Senior,Assistant Editors Issue: 8 Stelios Hatzidakis, Layout Editor It’s a Knockout! After seven days of play and nearly 400 deals, the Orbis Bermuda Bowl and Orbis Venice Cup move into the quarterfinal rounds today. With the defenders, France, eliminated, a new champion is guaranteed in the former event but there is a chance for a repeat in the latter. Top teams in both qualifying events were allowed to choose their opponents for the quarterfinal knockout phase. The match-ups, with carryover IMPs in parentheses, are: Orbis Bermuda Bowl Orbis Venice Cup Indonesia vs. Norway (+5.5) Canada (+4) vs. USA 1 Italy vs. USA 1 (+13.5) China vs. The Netherlands (+16) Poland (even) vs. USA 2 Austria (+10) vs. Germany Brazil (+6) vs. Sweden France vs. Denmark (+16) There were some disappointed former world champions in both events. France, defending champions in the Orbis Bermuda Bowl, finished 10th out of 20 teams in the round-robin standings, 14 Victory Points out of eighth place, the final qualifying spot. Norway led the Orbis Bermuda Bowl qualifiers with 345 VPs, just ahead of second-place USA 1, with 340. Poland held down the third spot, followed by Brazil, which vaulted from eighth place on the strength of big victories against China and Chinese Taipei. In the Orbis Venice Cup, USA 1, which includes three members of the team which won the event in 1997, led qualifiers into the quarterfinal round, followed by The Netherlands, Austria and Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarko & Gary Bridge Notes
    Last Revised: November 13, 2011 Gary – Various Partners Bridge Notes November 13, 2011 1 Last Revised: November 13, 2011 Contents Slam Bidding ...................................................................................................................... 5 Examples – Major Suit Auctions .................................................................................... 5 Example Minor Suit Slam Auctions ............................................................................... 6 Responses to RKCB with a Void .................................................................................... 7 Queen-Ask at the 5-Level When Hearts are Trump ....................................................... 7 When a Great Fit has been discovered via Stayman ....................................................... 8 Serious 3NT .................................................................................................................... 8 The Idle Major ................................................................................................................ 9 Control Asking Bid Responses ....................................................................................... 9 Short Suit Asking Bids.................................................................................................... 9 Short Suit Telling Bids.................................................................................................. 10 Constructive Bidding .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Bridge System Collection Jan Eric Larsson Palo Alto, California, May 5
    From: Jan Eric Larsson <[email protected]> A Bridge System Collection Jan Eric Larsson Palo Alto, California, May 5th, 1995 Preface This report started out almost by accident. Just wanting to write down some information about different bidding systems, I started collecting more and more of them. Soon, the effort grew, and I decided to ask for more information on the Internet, in the newsgroup Rec.games.bridge, (RGB). When motivating people, I realized that I had to promise to share what I found. Why shouldn't I? Well, the very obvious reason is that, in order to share information, it should be put in readable form... Anyway, that is how this system collection began. What is it good for? My original objective was to make an overview of different systems, in order to get a general idea of what kinds of systems that have been invented, played, and what you might expect to meet from time to time. As a bidding system designer, I also wanted to see what kinds of bids I should device defenses against, (I do not belong to that unpleasant category of Bridge players who wish to forbid every unusual system just because they don't have the will to prepare a defense against them). Hopefully, this information can be of general interest, and if you happen to find a system that you would like to know more about, I have included my sources as often as possible. If there is no attribution, well, then the information comes from me and my general Bridge knowledge or experiences.
    [Show full text]