A Simple Strong Pass System George Cuppaidge Sept 2012 Jorj41
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rivista N. 07-08.1988
CAMPIONATO ITALIANO COPPIE MISTE 1998 CHIUSURA ISCRIZIONI PER TUTTI I PARTECIPANTI ALLA FASE LOCALE/REGIONALE: 25 settembre 1998 PER LE COPPIE AVENTI DIRITTO ALLA FASE DI FINALE NAZIONALE: 25 settembre 1998 QUOTE ISCRIZIONE e PRESTITI La quota iscrizione per le coppie partecipanti alla fase locale/regionale è di lire 120.000 da inviare ai Comitati Regionali di competenza. Gli eventuali prestiti delle coppie iscritte alla fase locale/provinciale sono classificati come prestiti regionali (lire 50.000) se effettuati tra Società della stessa Regione, diventano invece Prestiti Nazionali se effettuati tra Società di diversa Regione. Le coppie promosse dalla fase locale/regionale alla fase Finale Nazionale integreranno la loro iscrizione (lire 80.000) direttamente a SALSOMAGGIORE TERME il giorno 30 ottobre 1998 al momento della conferma della partecipazione. La quota iscrizione per le coppie aventi diritto alla fase di Finale Nazionale è di lire 200.000 da inviare assieme agli elenchi delle formazioni alla segreteria FIGB - via C. Menotti 11/C-20129 MILANO (Sez. Campionati e Tornei) entro la data di chiusura delle iscrizioni. Le coppie non confermate entro il 25 settembre 1998 perderanno il diritto alla partecipazione alla fase Finale Nazionale. Gli eventuali prestiti delle coppie aventi diritto alla fase di Finale Nazionale sono Prestiti Nazionali. DATE DI SVOLGIMENTO Fase Locale/Regionale: a cura dei Comitati Regionali, entro il 25 ottobre 1998. Fase Finale Nazionale: Salsomaggiore Terme dal 30 ottobre all’1 novembre 1998. ELENCHI DELLE COPPIE -
VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard. -
EARLY EUROPEAN TRA -\Rellers in 'L'de NAGPUR TERRITORIES • Early European Travellers in the Nagpur Territories
EARLY EUROPEAN TRA_-\rELLERS IN 'l'DE NAGPUR TERRITORIES • Early European Travellers in the Nagpur Territories Reprinted· from Old Records NAG PUR: PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRESS 1930 [Price-Three Rupees.] 'Agents fol' the sale of Publications issued bJI the Central Provinces Government. ", ·~ [NOTE.-Appointments oLall official Agents in the United Kingdom and on the Continent for the sale of Government l'ublications have been terminated with effect from the 1st April 1925. - AU publications in future are obtainable either direct frcm the High Commissioner for India, India House Aldwych, London, W. C. 2, or through any bookseller.] INDIA. AKOLA: JUBBULPORE: Jhe Proprietor, Shri Ramdas The .1\-lannger, General Book Stores, Tajnapeth. Depot. ALLAHABAD: KARACHI: Mr. Ram Narain Lal, Publisher, ! 1 he· Standard Bookstall. etc., l, Bank Road KHANDWA: The Superintendent, Nazair Kanun The r'roprietor, >hri Ramdas Stores. Hir.d Press. Khandwa Hranch. LAHORE: M1RAOTI: Rai Sahib M. Guiab Singh & • Thakur & Co., Booksellers. Sons. BARODA: LUCKNOW: Mr. M. C. Kothari, Bookseller and 'lhe Proprietor, Newal Kisho.e Publisher, Raopura Road. Press. ' The Upper India Publishing lHLASPUR: House, Ltd , 41, Aminabud Mr. M. A. Subhan, Book~>eller Park. and Publisher. MADRAS: U0MHAY: Higginbotham & Co. D. B. Taraporevala, Sons & Co., S. Murthy & Co., Post Box 190, Hornby Road, Fort. No. 152. Radhnbn: A tmaram Sagoon. The Proprietor, The City Book Sunder Pandurang, 25, Kalbadevi Co., Post Box No. 283. Road. ~AG?Ui<: Thacker & Co., Ltd. Aidan Binzani, Proprietors, Kar CALCUTTA: mavir !:look Depot, Mahal The Book Company. 4/4-A, Mr. G. G. Khot, Walker Road. College Street. Mr. G. A. -
A British Rifle Man; the Journals and Correspondence of Major George Simmons, Rifle Brigade, During the Peninsular War and the C
c^^'^«kiirMlANCA • J; VITTORIA 1? WATCRIOO- THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES -^ Fairfield Secondary School, AWARD. Name .Jfi^,I^..W*4*Vv*<^-.. Form J^^. Subject :^^/&y. tcJ'J^. Date ^\.'. l?|l*f Principal. A BRITISH RIFLE MAN A BRITISH RIFLE MAN THE JOURNALS AND CORRESPONDENCE OF MAJOR GEORGE SIMMONS, RIFLE BRIGADE, DURING THE PENINSULAR WAR AND THE CAMPAIGN OF WATERLOO EDITED, WITH INTRODUCTION, BY LIEUT.-COLONEL WILLOUGHBY VERNER LATE RIFLE BRIGADE AUTHOR OF ' SKETCHES IN THE SOUDAN,' ETC. WITH THREE MAPS LONDON A. & C. BLACK, SOHO SQUARE 1899 All rights reserved DC S^rih To GENERAL HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUKE OF CONNAUGHT AND STRATHEARN, COLONEL-IN-CHIEF OF THE RIFLE BRIGADE, FORMERLY (1803-1816) STYLED THE 95TH RIFLES AND (1800-1802) THE RIFLE CORPS, THIS VOLUME IN WHICH A BRITISH RIFLE MAN RECOUNTS HIS PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF MANY OF THE DEEDS THAT HAVE MADE THE NAME OF THE REGIMENT SO FAMOUS IS (by permission) dedicated BY HIS MOST HUMBLE AND OBEDIENT SERVANT WILLOUGHBY VERNER, LIEUTENANT-COLONEL, LATE OF THE RIFLE BRIGADE. 821450 SKETCH MAPS Illustrating the operations on the Coa and Agueda ....... Facing page 198 Illustrating movements during the Campaigns of 1809-12 ......,,„ 272 Illustrating movements during the Campaigns ofi8i3-i4 „ „ 350 CONTENTS Introduction ....... Page xi Commencement of the Peninsular War. Cam- paign OF 1808 ....... I Campaign of 1809 ....... 2 CHAPTER I Letter No. I., To his Parents, from Hythc and Dover, dated 21st May 1809 — Journal, May-July 1809 — Letter No. IL, To his Parents, from Castello Branco, dated i8th July 1809 4 CHAPTER II Journal, July-December 1809—Letter No. -
Israel Leads the 2006 NEC Cup
Thursday, February 9, 2006 Bulletin Number 3 Editors: Eric Kokish, Richard Colker Israel Leads the 2006 NEC Cup With two strong wins and a medium loss, the Israeli team (Israel Yadlin, Doron Yadlin, Michael Barel, Migry Campanile), with 123 VPs, has taken the lead in the 2006 NEC Cup. Tied for second place, only 4 IMPs back, are the WBF (French) Women (Bénédicte Cronier, Sylvie Willard, Catherine d'Ovidio, Daniele Gaviard) and YOI (Chen Dawei, Kazuo Furuta, Masayuki Ino, Tadashi Imakura, Yoshiyuki Nakamura, Yasuhiro Shimizu), both with119 VPs. In fourth place with 115 VPs is the USA/Kasle team and in fifth place with 113 VPs are the Italians. The Paul Hackett team, who held the lead at the end of Day 1, suffered three losses to fall to a tie for ninth/tenth place. The complete rankings are shown below while individual results of the first three matches are on page 4. NEC Cup: Standings After Day Two (Six Matches) Rank Team VPs Rank Team VPs Rank Team VPs 1 ISRAEL 123 15/17 SKOTII 96 29/31 Sweet Briar 79 2/3 WBF Women (Fr.) 119 15/17 HANA 96 29/31 BIRD 79 2/3 YOI 119 15/17 Happy Koro 96 29/31 KinKi 79 4 USA/Kasle 115 18 SLAM DUNK 95 32/33 MERRY QUEENS 76 5 Italy 113 19/20 Magnolia 92 32/33 Kimura@Yokohama 76 6 OzOne-Del’Monte 110 19/20 JAPAN YAMADA 92 34 Charade 74 7 USA/Mahaffey 109 21 SARA 89 35 XYZ 72 8 FISK 108 22 Fairy Tale 88 36 Sun Flowers 71 9/10 Paul Hackett 102 23 NAITO 87 37 CACTI (Korea) 70 9/10 South America 102 24/25 GIRASOL 86 38/39 LBH 69 11 Estrellas 101 24/25 PS-Jack 86 38/39 Japan Youth 69 12/13 USA/Mori 99 26 ESPERANZA 84 40 HYLII (Korea) 66 12/13 TAJIMA 99 27 Makko 82 41 Solaris 59 14 OzOne-Neill 97 28 MY-Bridge 80 42 Kuznun Karas 26 NEC Cup Bridge Festival on the Web Follow the action at the 11th NEC Cup Bridge Festival by surfing to: http://bridge.cplaza.ne.jp/necfest.html – or – http://www.jcbl.or.jp Follow our featured matches on Vugraph each day at: www.bridgebase.com NEC Cup 2006: Conditions of Contest An 8-round Swiss, qualifying the top 8 teams to the Knockout phase; no playbacks. -
Bid Outside the Box
Bid Outside the Box Jan Eric Larsson Today’s bidding systems have grown from When our side is weaker. the early days of contract bridge. Most of When the deal is fairly equal in strength. the time, you try to exchange information When there are wilder distributions. about high cards and distribution while naming plausible final contracts. Let us look at each of these situations and see what first principles we would wish for West East in a bidding system. 1h1 1s2 2s3 4s4 Our Side is Stronger First assume that our side holds most of the 1) “I think I can make one heart.” high card strength, and that the distributions 2) “I have spades.” are reasonably balanced, (or at least not 3) “If so we can make two spades.” extreme). 4) “Then we can make four spades.” In this case we want to conduct precise and Of course, many conventions and artificial constructive bidding to find the correct part bids have been invented, but the basis score, game, or slam. At the same time, we remains. Most bids show extra length or do not want to give away more information strength and name a potential final contract. than necessary to the defense. I propose the In the sequence above, 1s is the only following principles, (nothing new here). forcing bid. Keep Low with Strong Hands What would be the result if we tried first to In constructive bidding, we need to preserve formulate general principles for what a bidding space and keep the level low. Each bidding system should accomplish, and then extra bid gives us twice as many sequences designed the system from scratch, based on to use in the search for the best contract. -
Convention Card Editor
BASIC RESPONSES AUSTRALIAN BRIDGE FEDERATION Jump raises - minors limit forcing Other: not applicable INCORPORATED © Jump raises - majors limit forcing Other: not applicable STANDARD SYSTEM CARD Jump shifts after minor opening not applicable Names: Michael Bausor Rhys Cooper Jump shifts after major opening not applicable ABF Nos: 726222 726257 Responses to strong 2 suit opening not applicable Basic System:Forcing Pass with relays Brown Sticker Responses to 2NT opening 3A strong others play or correct Classification: Green Blue Red Yellow PLAY CONVENTIONS OPENING BIDS 'NT' Versus Notrump 'S' Versus Suit = Both Describe strength, minimum length, or specific meaning Canape Sequence leads: Overlead all All except AK x (x) 1A 4+ C 8-12 pts 1B 4+D8-12 pts<4C 1C 0-7 pts any shape 1D flat8-12pts<4CD Underlead Other: 1 NT 5+/4+ minors 8-12 pts may contain 5 card major Four or more with an honour 4th highest attitude 2A Stayman: simple extended Other: invitational+ relay 3rd/5th Other: Transfers 2B N/A 2C N/A 2D N/A From 4 small 2nd highest Other: 3rd/5th 2 NTN/A Other: From 3 cards (no honour) top middle bottom 2A 6+ 8-12 pts Signal on partner's lead: high encourage low encourage 2B 6+ 8-12 pts Other: Natural count Mckenny overtones 2C 5+/5+ colour 9-12pts Signal on declarer's lead Natural count Mckenny overtones 2D 5+/5+ rank 9-12pts Discards McKenney high encourage low encourage 2 NT 5+/5+ shape 9-12pts odd/even Other: Natural count Mckenny overtones 3 NT specific ace ask Count natural reverse PRE-ALERTS: CALLS THAT MAY HAVE UNEXPECTED MEANING/S -
Orbis Bermuda Bowl Both the Orbis Bermuda Bowl and the Orbis Venice Cup Feature Tight Races for the Top Eight Qualifying Spots
Thursday, 13 January 2000 Jean Paul Meyer, Co-ordinator Mark Horton, Editor Brent Manley & Brian Senior,Assistant Editors Issue: 6 Stelios Hatzidakis, Layout Editor Race for the eighth! Orbis Bermuda Bowl Both the Orbis Bermuda Bowl and the Orbis Venice Cup feature tight races for the top eight qualifying spots. Play in the quarterfinal stages of both events begins on Saturday. Each team has five more chances to make the cut. Indonesia, which had slipped to third place after two losses on Wednesday, had a huge 14th round against one of the other strong contenders in the Orbis Bermuda Bowl to regain first place in the round-robin standings. In the Orbis Bermuda Bowl, Indonesia routed Poland, 53-14, to surge back into first place with 256 Victory Points, just three ahead of second-place USA 1. Right behind the Americans are Norway with 250 VPs, followed by Poland with 242. Indonesia lost earlier in the day to Italy, 56-29, and to Brazil, 37-31. USA 1 was clobbered by Poland in the first match of the day, 73-32, but came back with victories against South Africa, 68-43, and Sweden, 44-31. Orbis Venice Cup In the Orbis Venice Cup, Denmark's lead of 23 VPs starting play Wednesday was whittled to 3 after two losses and a narrow victory.After 14 matches, the Danes had 268 VPs to 265 for second-place Austria. France was within striking distance at 262 and USA 1 was close with 259. Top Geir! Denmark edged Canada, 41-37, to start off Wednesday, but dropped their next two matches, losing to The Netherlands, 47-33, and to Argentina, 45-32. -
EBL Standard Card Notes
Supplementary notes file (European Standard Card) Note:..1: Two-over-one Responses: 1D-2C and 1M-2x A 2/1 response is forcing-to-game except where responder rebids his suit simply after opener has not promised extra values. Thus: 1D-2C; 2D-3D and 1D-2C; 3C are forcing. Note:..2: Jump shifts (JS) A simple jump-shift response shows an extra value opening bid (16+HCP) with a strong suit (at least 5 cards, 2/3 top honors) and one of three hand-types: 1) long one-suiter 2) good support 3) balanced or near-balanced Note:..3: 1m - 2m: Opener can: (1) play in 3m by bidding it (2) bid 2NT, nonforcing (NF) (3) bid a new suit, then stop in 3m Note:..4: Opener's Splinter Raise Opener's rebid 1 level above either a jump shift or a forcing reverse is a game-forcing splinter raise. Note:..5: 1m - 2NT: Opener's 3m is nonforcing, new suits are forcing. Note:..6: Reverses After a one-level suit response, opener’s reverse is forcing and promises a rebid below game. The partnership will reach at least game unless responder’s next bid is two of his original suit and the cheaper of a fourth-suit bid and two notrump (which are initially defined as preludes to a signoff. In the potentially weak sequences opener, if he can’t choose a game contract, can force to game artificially by bidding the fourth suit. With less than game-going values, opener can raise responder’s rebid suit (suggesting strong two-card support), bid two notrump, or rebid his first suit. -
It's a Knockout!
Saturday, 15 January 2000 Jean Paul Meyer, Co-ordinator Mark Horton, Editor Brent Manley & Brian Senior,Assistant Editors Issue: 8 Stelios Hatzidakis, Layout Editor It’s a Knockout! After seven days of play and nearly 400 deals, the Orbis Bermuda Bowl and Orbis Venice Cup move into the quarterfinal rounds today. With the defenders, France, eliminated, a new champion is guaranteed in the former event but there is a chance for a repeat in the latter. Top teams in both qualifying events were allowed to choose their opponents for the quarterfinal knockout phase. The match-ups, with carryover IMPs in parentheses, are: Orbis Bermuda Bowl Orbis Venice Cup Indonesia vs. Norway (+5.5) Canada (+4) vs. USA 1 Italy vs. USA 1 (+13.5) China vs. The Netherlands (+16) Poland (even) vs. USA 2 Austria (+10) vs. Germany Brazil (+6) vs. Sweden France vs. Denmark (+16) There were some disappointed former world champions in both events. France, defending champions in the Orbis Bermuda Bowl, finished 10th out of 20 teams in the round-robin standings, 14 Victory Points out of eighth place, the final qualifying spot. Norway led the Orbis Bermuda Bowl qualifiers with 345 VPs, just ahead of second-place USA 1, with 340. Poland held down the third spot, followed by Brazil, which vaulted from eighth place on the strength of big victories against China and Chinese Taipei. In the Orbis Venice Cup, USA 1, which includes three members of the team which won the event in 1997, led qualifiers into the quarterfinal round, followed by The Netherlands, Austria and Denmark. -
Sarko & Gary Bridge Notes
Last Revised: November 13, 2011 Gary – Various Partners Bridge Notes November 13, 2011 1 Last Revised: November 13, 2011 Contents Slam Bidding ...................................................................................................................... 5 Examples – Major Suit Auctions .................................................................................... 5 Example Minor Suit Slam Auctions ............................................................................... 6 Responses to RKCB with a Void .................................................................................... 7 Queen-Ask at the 5-Level When Hearts are Trump ....................................................... 7 When a Great Fit has been discovered via Stayman ....................................................... 8 Serious 3NT .................................................................................................................... 8 The Idle Major ................................................................................................................ 9 Control Asking Bid Responses ....................................................................................... 9 Short Suit Asking Bids.................................................................................................... 9 Short Suit Telling Bids.................................................................................................. 10 Constructive Bidding ....................................................................................................... -
A Bridge System Collection Jan Eric Larsson Palo Alto, California, May 5
From: Jan Eric Larsson <[email protected]> A Bridge System Collection Jan Eric Larsson Palo Alto, California, May 5th, 1995 Preface This report started out almost by accident. Just wanting to write down some information about different bidding systems, I started collecting more and more of them. Soon, the effort grew, and I decided to ask for more information on the Internet, in the newsgroup Rec.games.bridge, (RGB). When motivating people, I realized that I had to promise to share what I found. Why shouldn't I? Well, the very obvious reason is that, in order to share information, it should be put in readable form... Anyway, that is how this system collection began. What is it good for? My original objective was to make an overview of different systems, in order to get a general idea of what kinds of systems that have been invented, played, and what you might expect to meet from time to time. As a bidding system designer, I also wanted to see what kinds of bids I should device defenses against, (I do not belong to that unpleasant category of Bridge players who wish to forbid every unusual system just because they don't have the will to prepare a defense against them). Hopefully, this information can be of general interest, and if you happen to find a system that you would like to know more about, I have included my sources as often as possible. If there is no attribution, well, then the information comes from me and my general Bridge knowledge or experiences.