Towards Lucida Opentype Afm2tfm
TUGboat, Volume 32 (2011), No. 2 169 Another incarnation of Lucida: now be set up for use with TEX using fontinst or Towards Lucida OpenType afm2tfm. This development continued when PDFTEX was Ulrik Vieth and Mojca Miklavec developed and on-screen viewing of PDF files came Abstract into common use in the late 1990s. While the use of METAFONT-generated bitmap TEX has been in existence for more than 30 years. fonts packaged into Type 3 fonts was still acceptable During this time, TEX engines and device drivers for printing, such bitmap fonts turned out to be in- have gone through multiple generations of font tech- adequate for screen rendering in PDF viewers. As a nology: METAFONT, PostScript Type 1, and Open- result, the use of METAFONT fonts became unpop- Type. While choices for text fonts have greatly in- ular, and efforts were undertaken to provide Type 1 creased, there have always been few choices for math replacements for METAFONT fonts. fonts and even fewer for complete font families. In this era, choices of text fonts were increased The Lucida family of typefaces by Bigelow & significantly, but choices of math fonts remained lim- Holmes is a notable exception, as it provides not ited. Besides CM and AMS Euler, converted from only a math font, but also a complete font family, METAFONT, there were only the commercial offer- consisting of a large repertoire of serif, sans-serif, ings of MathTime and Lucida New Math at first. monospace, and fancy variants. Unfortunately, the It was only much later in this era that more current distribution of Lucida fonts dates back to choices of math fonts eventually became available, 1993 and is limited by the use of PostScript Type 1 such as txfonts, pxfonts, mathpazo, fourier, and fonts, which support only 8-bit character sets.
[Show full text]