Analysis of Big Bounce in Einstein--Cartan Cosmology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysis of Big Bounce in Einstein--Cartan Cosmology Analysis of big bounce in Einstein{Cartan cosmology Jordan L. Cubero∗ and Nikodem J. Poplawski y Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of New Haven, 300 Boston Post Road, West Haven, CT 06516, USA We analyze the dynamics of a homogeneous and isotropic universe in the Einstein{Cartan theory of gravity. The spin of fermions produces spacetime torsion that prevents gravitational singularities and replaces the big bang with a nonsingular big bounce. We show that a closed universe exists only when a particular function of its scale factor and temperature is higher than some threshold value, whereas an open and a flat universes do not have such a restriction. We also show that a bounce of the scale factor is double: as the temperature increases and then decreases, the scale factor decreases, increases, decreases, and then increases. Introduction. The Einstein{Cartan (EC) theory of a size where the cosmological constant starts cosmic ac- gravity provides the simplest mechanism generating a celeration. This expansion also predicts the cosmic mi- nonsingular big bounce, without unknown parameters crowave background radiation parameters that are con- or hypothetical fields [1]. EC is the simplest and most sistent with the Planck 2015 observations [11], as was natural theory of gravity with torsion, in which the La- shown in [12]. grangian density for the gravitational field is proportional The spin-fluid description of matter is the particle ap- to the Ricci scalar, as in general relativity [2, 3]. The con- proximation of the multipole expansion of the integrated sistency of the conservation law for the total (orbital plus conservation laws in EC. The particle approximation for spin) angular momentum of fermions in curved spacetime Dirac fields, however, is not self-consistent [13]. The spin- with the Dirac equation allowing the spin-orbit interac- fluid description also violates the cosmological principle tion requires that the antisymmetric part of the affine [14]. On the other hand, the Dirac form of the spin ten- connection, the torsion tensor [4], is not constrained to sor for fermionic matter, which follows directly from the zero [5]. Instead, torsion is determined by the field equa- Dirac Lagrangian using the Sciama-Kibble variation with tions obtained from the stationarity of the action un- respect to the torsion tensor [2, 15], is consistent with the der variations of the torsion tensor. In EC, the spin of cosmological principle [16]. The minimal coupling be- fermions is the source of torsion. tween the torsion tensor and Dirac fermions also averts The multipole expansion [6] of the conservation law for the big-bang singularity [17, 18]. Other forms of the tor- the spin tensor in EC gives a spin tensor which describes sion tensor in cosmology are investigated in [19]. fermionic matter as a spin fluid (ideal fluid with spin) The spin-torsion coupling modifies the Dirac equa- [7]. Once the torsion is integrated out, EC reduces to tion, adding a term that is cubic in spinor fields [20]. general relativity with an effective spin fluid as a matter As a result, fermions must be spatially extended [13], source [3]. The effective energy density and pressure of which could eliminate infinities arising in Feynman dia- 2 2 a spin fluid are given by ~ = − αnf andp ~ = p − αnf , grams involving fermion loops. In the presence of torsion, where and p are the thermodynamic energy density the four-momentum operator components do not com- and pressure, nf is the number density of fermions, and mute and thus the integration in the momentum space α = κ(~c)2=32 with κ = 8πG=c4 [8, 9]. The negative in Feynman diagrams must be replaced with the sum- corrections from the spin-torsion coupling generate grav- mation over the discrete momentum eigenvalues. The itational repulsion which prevents the formation of grav- resulting sums are finite: torsion naturally regularizes arXiv:1906.11824v1 [gr-qc] 27 Jun 2019 itational singularities and replaces the big bang with a ultraviolet-divergent integrals in quantum electrodynam- nonsingular bounce, at which the universe transitions ics [21]. Torsion may also explain the matter-antimatter from contraction to expansion. These corrections lead asymmetry [22] and the cosmological constant [23]. to a violation of the strong energy condition by the spin The analysis in [17] considered a closed, homogeneous, fluid when + 3p − 4αn2 drops below 0, thus evading f and isotropic universe in EC. However, the calculations of the singularity theorems [8]. Accordingly, this violation the maximum temperature and the minimum scale factor could be thought of as the cause of the bounce. at a bounce neglected the factor k = 1 in the Friedmann The dynamics of the universe filled with a spin fluid in equations (which is justified during and after inflation EC has been studied in [9]. The expansion of the closed but not at a bounce before inflation), de facto consider- universe with torsion and quantum particle production ing a flat universe. In addition, the time-dependence of shortly after a bounce is almost exponential for a finite the scale factor appeared to have a cusp-like behavior at period of time, explaining inflation [10]. Depending on the bounce. In this article, we refine those calculations by the particle production rate, the universe may undergo taking k into account and analyzing the turning points of several bounces until it produces enough matter to reach the universe for all three cases: k = 1 (closed universe), 2 k = 0 (flat universe), and k = −1 (open universe). We bosons and fermions, respectively. For standard-model discover that a closed universe exists only when some particles, gb = 29 and gf = 90. In the presence of spin function of the scale factor and temperature is higher and torsion, the first Friedmann equation is therefore [17] than a particular threshold, whereas an open and flat a_ 2 1 universes are not restricted by this condition. Accord- + k = κ(h T 4 − αh2 T 6)a2: (8) ingly, a closed universe forms in a region of space within c2 3 ? nf a trapped null surface when this threshold is reached. The first law of thermodynamics (7) gives Such a region could be the interior of a black hole [24]. Torsion therefore may explain the origin of our universe dT 3αh2 da [10]. − nf T dT + = 0 (9) T 2h a Dynamics of scale factor and temperature. If ? we assume that the universe is homogeneous and or isotropic, then it is described by the Friedmann- dT T dT da Lema^ıtre-Robertson-Walker metric, which is given in the − 2 + = 0; (10) isotropic spherical coordinates by T Tcr a a2(t) where ds2 = c2dt2 − (dr2 + r2dθ2 + r2 sin2 θ dφ2); (1 + kr2=4)2 2h 1=2 T = ? = 2:218 × 1031 K (11) (1) cr 3αh2 where a(t) is the scalar factor as a function of the cosmic nf time t [25]. The Einstein field equations for this metric is the critical temperature. Equation (10) determines the become the Friedmann equations: scale factor a as a function of temperature T and can be integrated to a_ 2 1 + k = κa~ 2 (2) 2 ∗ T 2 c 3 C 2 a(T ) = e 2Tcr ; (12) and T ∗ a_ 2 + 2aa¨ where C is an integration constant. This constant is + k = −κpa~ 2; (3) c2 positive because the scale factor and temperature are positive. where a dot denotes the derivative with respect to t. The We define nondimensional quantities: effective energy density and pressure for a Dirac field are given by [15, 17]. T x = ; (13) Tcr ~ = − αn2; p~ = p + αn2; (4) a f f y = ; (14) a where cr ct 9 τ = ; (15) α = κ( c)2: (5) acr 16 ~ where Multiplying the first Friedmann equation by a and differ- 4 1=2 entiating over time, and subtracting from it the second 27 αhnf −35 acr = ~c 3 = 6:661 × 10 m: (16) Friedmann equation multiplied bya _ gives an equation 8 h? that has the form of the first law of thermodynamics for an adiabatic universe: Henceforth, we will use a dot to denote the derivative with respect to the new time coordinate τ. Equation (8) d d ( − αn2)a3 + (p + αn2) (a3) = 0; (6) can be written, using these quantities, as dt f f dt 2 4 6 2 which gives y_ + k = (3x − 2x )y : (17) 3 3 3 Equation (12) can be written as a d − 2αa nf dnf + ( + p)d(a ) = 0: (7) C 2 The matter in the early universe is ultrarelativistic. If y(x) = ex =2; (18) 4 we assume kinetic equilibrium, then we can use = h?T , x 3 p = /3, and nf = hnfT , where T is the temperature of ∗ 2 4 3 where C is a positive constant, related to C by the universe, h? = (π =30)(gb + (7=8)gf)kB=(~c) , and 2 3 3 ∗ hnf = (ζ(3)/π )(3=4)gfkB=(~c) [26]. The quantities gb C C = : (19) and gf are the numbers of spin states for all elementary acrTcr 3 FIG. 1: The nondimensionalized scale factor y as a function of the nondimensionalized temperature x for C = 1. The minimum value of y is positive: the universe is nonsingular. FIG. 2: A curve representing the function on the left-hand side of Eq. (23) has two points of intersection with a horizon- tal line 1=C2 if C > e−1=2. Substitution of y(x) in Eq. (18) into Eq. (17) gives −1=2 2 If C < e , Eq. (20) has no turning points and the y_2 + k = C2(3x2 − 2x4)ex : (20) universe would not exist. The function y(x), given by Eq.
Recommended publications
  • Cosmic Questions, Answers Pending
    special section | cosmic questions, Answers pending Cosmic questions, answers pending throughout human history, great missions of mission reveal the exploration have been inspired by curiosity, : the desire to find out about unknown realms. secrets of the universe such missions have taken explorers across wide oceans and far below their surfaces, THE OBJECTIVE deep into jungles, high onto mountain peaks For millennia, people have turned to the heavens in search of clues to nature’s mysteries. truth seekers from ages past to the present day and over vast stretches of ice to the earth’s have found that the earth is not the center of the universe, that polar extremities. countless galaxies dot the abyss of space, that an unknown form of today’s greatest exploratory mission is no matter and dark forces are at work in shaping the cosmos. Yet despite longer earthbound. it’s the scientific quest to these heroic efforts, big cosmological questions remain unresolved: explain the cosmos, to answer the grandest What happened before the Big Bang? ............................... Page 22 questions about the universe as a whole. What is the universe made of? ......................................... Page 24 what is the identity, for example, of the Is there a theory of everything? ....................................... Page 26 Are space and time fundamental? .................................... Page 28 “dark” ingredients in the cosmic recipe, com- What is the fate of the universe? ..................................... Page 30 posing 95 percent of the
    [Show full text]
  • The Anthropic Principle and Multiple Universe Hypotheses Oren Kreps
    The Anthropic Principle and Multiple Universe Hypotheses Oren Kreps Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: The Fine-Tuning Argument and the Anthropic Principle .............................................. 3 The Improbability of a Life-Sustaining Universe ....................................................................... 3 Does God Explain Fine-Tuning? ................................................................................................ 4 The Anthropic Principle .............................................................................................................. 7 The Multiverse Premise ............................................................................................................ 10 Three Classes of Coincidence ................................................................................................... 13 Can The Existence of Sapient Life Justify the Multiverse? ...................................................... 16 How unlikely is fine-tuning? .................................................................................................... 17 Section 2: Multiverse Theories ..................................................................................................... 18 Many universes or all possible
    [Show full text]
  • White-Hole Dark Matter and the Origin of Past Low-Entropy Francesca Vidotto, Carlo Rovelli
    White-hole dark matter and the origin of past low-entropy Francesca Vidotto, Carlo Rovelli To cite this version: Francesca Vidotto, Carlo Rovelli. White-hole dark matter and the origin of past low-entropy. 2018. hal-01771746 HAL Id: hal-01771746 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01771746 Preprint submitted on 20 Apr 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 White-hole dark matter and the origin of past low-entropy Francesca Vidotto University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Departamento de F´ısicaTe´orica,Barrio Sarriena, 48940 Leioa, Spain [email protected] Carlo Rovelli CPT, Aix-Marseille Universit´e,Universit´ede Toulon, CNRS, case 907, Campus de Luminy, 13288 Marseille, France [email protected] Submission date April 1, 2018 Abstract Recent results on the end of black hole evaporation give new weight to the hypothesis that a component of dark matter could be formed by remnants of evaporated black holes: stable Planck-size white holes with a large interior. The expected lifetime of these objects is consistent with their production at reheating. But remnants could also be pre-big bang relics in a bounce cosmology, and this possibility has strong implications on the issue of the source of past low entropy: it could realise a perspectival interpretation of past low entropy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing the Limits of Time Beyond the Big Bang Singularity: Scenarios for the Branch Cut Universe
    Received 05 april 2021; Revised 11 april 2021; Accepted 17 april 2021 DOI: xxx/xxxx ARTICLE TYPE Pushing the limits of time beyond the Big Bang singularity: Scenarios for the branch cut universe César A. Zen Vasconcellos*1,2 | Peter O. Hess3,4 | Dimiter Hadjimichef1 | Benno Bodmann5 | Moisés Razeira6 | Guilherme L. Volkmer1 1Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil In this contribution we identify two scenarios for the evolutionary branch cut uni- 2International Center for Relativistic verse. In the first scenario, the universe evolves continuously from the negative Astrophysics Network (ICRANet), Pescara, Italy complex cosmological time sector, prior to a primordial singularity, to the positive 3Universidad Nacional Autónoma de one, circumventing continuously a branch cut, and no primordial singularity occurs Mexico (UNAM), México City, México in the imaginary sector, only branch points. In the second scenario, the branch cut 4Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), J.W. von Goethe University and branch point disappear after the realisation of the imaginary component of the (JWGU), Hessen, Germany complex time by means of a Wick rotation, which is replaced by the thermal time. In 5 Unversidade Federal de Santa Maria the second scenario, the universe has its origin in the Big Bang, but the model con- (UFSM), Santa Maria, Brazil 6Laboratório de Geociências Espaciais e templates simultaneously a mirrored parallel evolutionary universe going backwards Astrofísica (LaGEA), Universidade Federal in the cosmological thermal time negative sector. A quantum formulation based on do PAMPA (UNIPAMPA), Caçapava do the WDW equation is sketched and preliminary conclusions are drawn.
    [Show full text]
  • A Physico-Chemical Approach to Understanding Cosmic Evolution: Thermodynamics of Expansion and Composition of the Universe
    A Physico-Chemical Approach To Understanding Cosmic Evolution: Thermodynamics Of Expansion And Composition Of The Universe Carlos A. Melendres ( [email protected] ) The SHD Institute Research Article Keywords: Physical and Astrochemistry, composition and expansion of the universe, thermodynamics, phase diagram, Quantum Space, spaceons, dark energy, dark matter, cosmological constant, cosmic uid, Quintessence Posted Date: March 17th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-306782/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License A PHYSICO-CHEMICAL APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING COSMIC EVOLUTION: THERMODYNAMICS OF EXPANSION AND COMPOSITION OF THE UNIVERSE Carlos A. Melendres The SHD Institute 216 F Street, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] February 2021 (Prepared for: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS) Keywords: Physical and Astrochemistry, composition and expansion of the universe, thermodynamics, phase diagram, Quantum Space, spaceons, dark energy, dark matter, cosmological constant, cosmic fluid, Quintessence 1 A PHYSICO-CHEMICAL APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING COSMIC EVOLUTION: THERMODYNAMICS OF EXPANSION AND COMPOSITION OF THE UNIVERSE Carlos A. Melendres [email protected] ABSTRACT We present a physico-chemical approach towards understanding the mysteries associated with the Inflationary Big Bang model of Cosmic evolution, based on a theory that space consists of energy quanta. We use thermodynamics to elucidate the expansion of the universe, its composition, and the nature of dark energy and dark matter. The universe started from an atomic size volume of space quanta at very high temperature. Upon expansion and cooling, phase transitions resulted in the formation of fundamental particles, and matter which grow into stars, galaxies, and clusters due to gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanation of Time Travel Using Big Bounce
    Explanation of time travel using big bounce Sarvesh Gharat, Btech Entc, VIIT Pune Email:- sarvesh. [email protected] Abstract:-We are going to see a short description on what exactly big bounce theory is and also we know that as per most of the theories, we know that time is nothing but just a 4th dimension.So there are many questions and paradoxes which occur if we talk about a thing called time travel. But today we are going to provide a solution for twin paradox and also are going to see, whether we can move into past, if yes then in which condition we will move into past i.e any year and in which condition we will move into past with respect to time moving in future i.e past wrt normal frame of reference but limited to the year in which we started traveling. Keywords:- Time dilation, M theory , universe, big bounce , expansion of universe , dimension, time Introduction:-There are many theories regarding formation of our universe, but one of the most accepted theory till now is the big bounce theory which says that our universe is expanding for now and will contract after some billion of years. We also know that as per M theory there are 11 dimensions out of which time is the 4th dimension. So in this paper we are going to explain how does time dilation works with the help of expansion of our universe and also what will happen to time when universe will start to contradict as mentioned in later part of big bounce theory Big bounce theory:- We all are aware of the big bounce theory which is been applied to our universe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Simplest Origin of the Big Bounce and Inflation
    International Journal of Modern Physics D Vol. 27, No. 14 (2018) 1847020 c World Scientific Publishing Company THE SIMPLEST ORIGIN OF THE BIG BOUNCE AND INFLATION Nikodem Pop lawski Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of New Haven, 300 Boston Post Road, West Haven, CT 06516, USA∗ Torsion is a geometrical object, required by quantum mechanics in curved spacetime, which may naturally solve fundamental problems of general theory of relativity and cosmology. The black- hole cosmology, resulting from torsion, could be a scenario uniting the ideas of the big bounce and inflation, which were the subject of a recent debate of renowned cosmologists. Keywords: Spin, torsion, Einstein{Cartan theory, big bounce, inflation, black hole. I have recently read an interesting article, Pop Goes the Universe, in the January 2017 edition of Scientific American, written by Anna Ijjas, Paul Steinhardt, and Abraham Loeb (ISL) [1]. This article follows an article by the same authors, Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck 2013 [2]. They state that cosmologists should reassess their favored inflation paradigm because it has become nonempirical science, and consider new ideas about how the Universe began, namely, the big bounce. Their statements caused a group of 33 renowned physicists, including 4 Nobel Prize in Physics laureates, to write a reply, A Cosmic Controversy, categorically disagreeing with ISL about the testability of inflation and defending the success of inflationary models [3]. I agree with the ISL critique of the inflation paradigm, but I also agree with these 33 physicists that some models of inflation are testable. As a solution to this dispute, I propose a scenario, in which every black hole creates a new universe on the other side of its event horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclic Cosmology, Conformal Symmetry and the Metastability of the Higgs ∗ Itzhak Bars A, Paul J
    Physics Letters B 726 (2013) 50–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Cyclic cosmology, conformal symmetry and the metastability of the Higgs ∗ Itzhak Bars a, Paul J. Steinhardt b,c, , Neil Turok d a Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0484, USA b California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA c Department of Physics and Princeton Center for Theoretical Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA d Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5, Canada article info abstract Article history: Recent measurements at the LHC suggest that the current Higgs vacuum could be metastable with a Received 31 July 2013 modest barrier (height (1010–12 GeV)4) separating it from a ground state with negative vacuum density Received in revised form 23 August 2013 of order the Planck scale. We note that metastability is problematic for standard bang cosmology but Accepted 26 August 2013 is essential for cyclic cosmology in order to end one cycle, bounce, and begin the next. In this Letter, Available online 2 September 2013 motivated by the approximate scaling symmetry of the standard model of particle physics and the Editor: M. Cveticˇ primordial large-scale structure of the universe, we use our recent formulation of the Weyl-invariant version of the standard model coupled to gravity to track the evolution of the Higgs in a regularly bouncing cosmology. We find a band of solutions in which the Higgs field escapes from the metastable phase during each big crunch, passes through the bang into an expanding phase, and returns to the metastable vacuum, cycle after cycle after cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundbird Experiment an Experiment for CMB PolarizaOn Measurements at a Large Angular Scale from the Ground
    GroundBIRD Experiment an experiment for CMB polariza2on measurements at a large angular scale from the ground Osamu Tajima (KEK) The GroundBIRD group GroundBIRD’s target Probing Inflationary Universe B-modes in CMB polarization is Primordial its smoking-gun signature !! Gravitational Foregrounds Now Waves CMB First star Begin of the Universe Inflation Big Bang Dark age Recombination Re-ionization Galaxy formation Age 10-36 sec 380 Kyr 1 Myr 13.8 Gyr 2 Now Foregrounds Foregrounds Now First starCMB CMBFirst star Begin of the Begin of the Universe Universe Inflation Inflation Dark age Dark age Reionization RecombinationRecombination Reionization 10 Chaotic p=1 ) Chaotic p=0.2 2 SSB (N =47~62) 1 e -1 (uK 10 π -2 /2 10 r = 0.10 l 10-3 10-4 r = 0.01 l(l+1)C -5 Two bumps structure is expected 10 10 100 1000 3 Multipole l (=180o/θ) Primordial B-modes Natural to have an experimental target:! " "spectrum measurements, ! " "i.e. simultaneous measurements of two bumps Model predictions 10 ) Chaotic p=1 2 Chaotic p=0.2 SSB (N =47~62) 1 e (uK 10-1 π /2 -2 l 10 r = 0.10 10-3 -4 r = 0.01 l(l+1)C 10 10-5 10 100 1000 Multipole l (=180o/θ) 4 Advantage of spectrum measurements w.r.t. physics Spectrum shape allows us to distinguish ! "whether the inflation model is ! "``standard’’ or ``beyond the standard’’! Just an example… At the case of Big Bounce model by exotic quantum-gravitational effects J. Grain, A. Barrau, T.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classical, Non-Singular, Bouncing Universe
    Prepared for submission to JCAP A classical, non-singular, bouncing universe Özenç Güngör,a and Glenn D. Starkmana aISO/CERCA/Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7079 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. We present a model for a classical, non-singular bouncing cosmology without violation of the null energy condition (NEC). The field content is General Relativity plus a real scalar field with a canonical kinetic term and only renormalizable, polynomial-type self-interactions for the scalar field in the Jordan frame. The universe begins vacuum-energy dominated and is contracting at t = −∞. We consider a closed universe with a positive spatial curvature, which is responsible for the universe bouncing without any NEC violation. An Rφ2 coupling between the Ricci scalar and the scalar field drives the scalar field from arXiv:2011.05133v2 [gr-qc] 12 Jan 2021 the initial false vacuum to the true vacuum during the bounce. The model is sub-Planckian throughout its evolution and every dimensionful parameter is below the effective-field-theory scale MP , so we expect no ghost-type or tachyonic instabilities. This model solves the horizon problem and extends co-moving particle geodesics to past infinity, resulting in a geodesically complete universe without singularities. We solve the Friedman equations and the scalar-field equation of motion numerically, and analytically under certain approximations. Keywords: cosmic singularity, alternatives to inflation, physics of the early universe, initial conditions and eternal universe 1 Introduction The Inflationary Big-Bang model, our standard model of cosmology, has had notable and numerous observational successes over the last several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • QUALIFIER EXAM SOLUTIONS 1. Cosmology (Early Universe, CMB, Large-Scale Structure)
    Draft version June 20, 2012 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 QUALIFIER EXAM SOLUTIONS Chenchong Zhu (Dated: June 20, 2012) Contents 1. Cosmology (Early Universe, CMB, Large-Scale Structure) 7 1.1. A Very Brief Primer on Cosmology 7 1.1.1. The FLRW Universe 7 1.1.2. The Fluid and Acceleration Equations 7 1.1.3. Equations of State 8 1.1.4. History of Expansion 8 1.1.5. Distance and Size Measurements 8 1.2. Question 1 9 1.2.1. Couldn't photons have decoupled from baryons before recombination? 10 1.2.2. What is the last scattering surface? 11 1.3. Question 2 11 1.4. Question 3 12 1.4.1. How do baryon and photon density perturbations grow? 13 1.4.2. How does an individual density perturbation grow? 14 1.4.3. What is violent relaxation? 14 1.4.4. What are top-down and bottom-up growth? 15 1.4.5. How can the power spectrum be observed? 15 1.4.6. How can the power spectrum constrain cosmological parameters? 15 1.4.7. How can we determine the dark matter mass function from perturbation analysis? 15 1.5. Question 4 16 1.5.1. What is Olbers's Paradox? 16 1.5.2. Are there Big Bang-less cosmologies? 16 1.6. Question 5 16 1.7. Question 6 17 1.7.1. How can we possibly see galaxies that are moving away from us at superluminal speeds? 18 1.7.2. Why can't we explain the Hubble flow through the physical motion of galaxies through space? 19 1.7.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ways in Which Universe Will End
    Volume 6, Issue 7, July – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology ISSN No:-2456-2165 Fate of Universe: The Ways in Which Universe will End Akshay Kaushal Abstract:- Accounts of creation and the end of the Infinitely a reduction of entropy by the Poincaré recurrence universe have always been complex and controversial. theorem, thermal fluctuations, and the fluctuation theorem There have always been varying theories from the will be witnessed. biblical, archaeological, and scientific among other points of view. The cosmology point of view is one of the Related to the Big Freeze is the Heat Death as an common and main accounts used as an explanation for explanation of how the universe might die. both the creation and the future of the universe. From a scientific point of view, cosmology makes the description The Heat Death scenario maintains that the universe and evaluation of possible scenarios of the creation, enters a state of maximum entropy whereby there is even evolution, and final state of the universe, without the distribution of everything and there are no gradients, yet untestable limitations of myths and theological basis. these gradients are required for sustaining information processing, such as life (Kragh, 23). While the Heat Death Keywords:- Universe, Big Bang, Big Rip, Hubble Constant. scenario agrees with the basis outlined in three spatial models, there is a need for the universe to eventually attain I. INTRODUCTION the minimum temperature required for its occurrence. Modern cosmology is dominated by key theories such 2. Big Rip as the Big Bang theory, weaving in key astronomy and The big rip theory is authored by Robert R.
    [Show full text]