Can Inflation Be Made Safe?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Can Inflation Be Made Safe? MASTER DISSERTATION IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS THEORETICAL PHYSICS GROUP Can Inflation Be Made Safe? Author: Supervisor: Evita Gamber Prof. Kellogg Stelle Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MSc Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces October 2020 Abstract It is claimed that an accelerated expansion era drove the universe to near flatness, ho- mogeneity and isotropy on large scales and stretched quantum fluctuations to today’s large scale structure. Many models have been developed in the past decades and the predictions made by inflation have been validated by cosmological measurements. In this thesis we will begin with its motivation and development. We will see that the theory (class) of inflation suffers from major problems. In the second part we dis- cuss the perturbative non-renormalisability of gravity, the asymptotic safety scenario and its renormalisation group treatment. Finally, we will explore whether and how inflation can be made safe. Acknowledgements Hereby, I would like to thank the Imperial Theory Group for the deep and broad knowl- edge I gained in the Qfff course and also thanks to my fellow peers for exciting dis- cussions and support. Flattening the curve wasn’t only important in inflation, we will all remember this year and probably proudly look back. It increased my curiosity in theoretical physics even more. I want to thank Prof Stelle and Prof Litim for their ad- vice in the past months. I am looking forward to proceeding this fascinating research during my PhD. Herzlichen Dank für die Unterstützung der Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes. I would also like to thank my mum and all others that have supported me in the past years to fulfill my dream despite the difficulties outside the academic life and supported my curiosity and meticulosity. Lastly, I want to thank the science community from yesterday, today and tomorrow. Maths and physics have always been the best medicine . Contents 1 Introduction 10 1.1 Background and Aim of This Thesis................... 10 1.2 History of Inflation (and Asymptotic Safety)............... 12 1.3 Conventions................................ 13 2 Motivation 14 2.1 Cosmological Principle.......................... 14 2.2 Horizon Problem............................. 15 2.3 Flatness Problem............................. 16 2.4 Monopole Problem............................ 17 2.5 Large Scale Structure........................... 18 2.6 The Need for Quantum Gravity (?).................... 18 2.6.1 Asymptotic Safety......................... 18 3 Physics of Inflation 20 3.1 Theory................................... 20 3.2 How to Inflate - Constraints on Inflation................. 20 3.2.1 Horizon and Flatness Problem as First Constraints....... 21 3.2.2 Slow-Roll Condition........................ 22 3.2.3 LSS................................. 23 3.2.4 Monopole Problem........................ 24 3.3 Models of Inflation............................ 24 3.3.1 De Sitter model.......................... 25 3.3.2 Old Inflation............................ 25 3.3.3 New Inflation........................... 27 3.3.4 Chaotic Inflation.......................... 27 3.3.5 Eternal Inflation.......................... 28 3.3.6 Starobinsky Inflation....................... 30 3.4 How to End Inflation........................... 34 3.4.1 Reheating............................. 34 3.5 Observations................................ 38 3.5.1 Cosmological Perturbations.................... 38 3.6 Inflation’s Extensions and Possible Alternatives............. 51 3.6.1 Variable Speed of Light...................... 51 3.6.2 Global Structure.......................... 52 3.6.3 Inflation in Loop Quantum Gravity................ 56 3.7 Dark Energy and Inflation......................... 57 2 4 Problems of Inflation 61 4.1 Fine Tuning Again............................. 61 4.1.1 Penrose’s Alternative....................... 65 4.2 ’Multimess’................................. 68 4.3 Physics/Mechanism not Clearly Understood............... 70 4.3.1 ISL Criticism (Again)....................... 72 4.4 Probability Problem............................ 73 4.4.1 Measure Problem......................... 74 4.4.2 Fokker-Planck treatment..................... 78 4.5 Observations................................ 79 4.6 Falsifiable?................................. 82 4.7 Need for Quantum Gravity........................ 84 5 Asymptotic Safety and Inflation 88 5.1 Asymptotic Safety and Renormalisation Group............. 88 5.2 Renormalisation.............................. 93 5.3 Coupling constants............................ 95 5.4 The Advantage of Asymptotic Safety................... 96 5.4.1 Effective Field Theory....................... 98 5.5 Einstein-Hilbert Truncation........................ 101 5.5.1 RG Flow.............................. 102 5.5.2 Quantum Einstein Gravity..................... 105 5.5.3 FRG and Perturbation Theory................... 107 5.6 Inflation in ASG.............................. 111 5.6.1 RG Improvement......................... 111 5.6.2 Asymptotically Safe Starobinsky Inflation............ 117 5.6.3 Consistency Conditions...................... 119 5.6.4 Further Higher Derivative AS Inflation.............. 123 5.6.5 Ghosts Once More......................... 125 5.6.6 Finite Action............................ 126 5.6.7 Scale Invariance.......................... 128 5.6.8 Entropy Production........................ 129 5.6.9 Mathematical Tools........................ 129 5.7 Some Remarks............................... 129 6 Conclusion 133 6.1 Outlook.................................. 133 6.2 A Summary of Important Questions................... 135 7 Appendix 137 7.1 A Brief History of the Universe...................... 137 7.2 Scale Overview.............................. 137 7.3 Cosmological Standard Model...................... 139 7.3.1 SR................................. 142 7.3.2 Energy Conditions......................... 144 7.4 Scalar Fields in Cosmology........................ 145 7.5 Dicke’s Fine-Tuning............................ 146 3 7.6 Cosmological No-Hair Conjecture..................... 147 7.7 Further Calculations............................ 147 7.7.1 How Many Causally Unconnected Regions Were There?.... 147 7.7.2 Energy Scale at Inflation..................... 148 7.7.3 Magnetic Monopoles in Cosmology................ 148 7.7.4 Slow-Roll Parameters....................... 150 7.7.5 Size of the Universe........................ 152 7.7.6 CMB Temperatures........................ 152 7.7.7 Weyl Curvature.......................... 153 7.7.8 Starobinsky Powerspectrum.................... 155 7.8 VSL Constraints.............................. 157 7.9 The Wavefunction of the Universe.................... 158 7.10 The Top-Down Approach......................... 160 7.11 Dark Energy - Attractor in Quintessence................. 161 7.12 Quantum Gravity in Brief......................... 161 7.12.1 Linearised Gravity......................... 163 7.12.2 Quantum Corrected Newton Potential.............. 167 7.13 ASG.................................... 168 7.13.1 Example.............................. 168 7.13.2 ’Derivation’ ERGE......................... 171 7.13.3 Example β-functions....................... 172 7.13.4 Effective potential......................... 174 7.13.5 Ghost mass............................. 175 4 List of Figures 2.1 CMB 2018 Planck, apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap180722.html ....... 14 2.2 Horizon problem [12] past light cone from today and initial light cone from the Big Bang don’t meet at recombination. .................. 15 2.3 Flatness problem, Ω = 1 is very unstable. In order to have spatial flatness today, Ω had to be very close to 1 from the beginning onwards (astro.umd.edu 2015 class23) ................................ 16 3.1 Horizon problem, is solved. Upper: temporal evolution of the physical length (blue) vs Hubble radius (red). Lower: temporal evolution of the same, but comoving scales. During Inflation the Hubble radius is behind the growing a, structures initially inside it grow beyond that. Lidde’s lectures(ned.ipac. caltech.edu/level5/Liddle) ...................... 21 3.2 Slow-roll potentials that are possible. For SR single field inflation a flat long plateau, linear potential Vi = V0 ´ cφi (a), a more generic potential with different regions where on the saddles and maxima SR is possible (b), plateau with potential moving uphill at φ ă 0 (c) and hilltop with potential moving 1 2 2 down for φ ă 0 Vi = V0 ´ 2 m φi (d). ’Multi-field inflation on the landscape’, 2009. .................................... 24 3.3 Piston explanation, PS6 MIT ’The Early Universe’, Guth, 2011. ....... 25 3.4 Comparison between the old and new inflationary model. Former has a local minimum as false vacuum, latter has a local maximum for which both quantum and classical treatment is metastable. ............... 26 3.5 Eternal universe, ’Inflationary Models and Connections to Particle Physics’, Guth, 2000. ................................. 28 3.6 Starobinsky potential. The potential has a minimum at 0(V 2(0) ¡ 0), sat- 3m2 urates as φ Ñ at V0 = 32πG and diverges for φ Ñ ´ .The RHS is dom- inated by the R2 behaviour, the LHS the usual Einstein-Hilbert term. ’Semi- classical analysis1 of the tensor power spectrum in the Starobinsky1 inflationary model’, 2020. ................................ 33 3.7 Eternal chaotic universe: quantum fluctuations are superimposed on the clas- 1 2 2 sical motion, here for V = 2 m φ . For values greater than the Planck density quantum fluctuations dominate that we cannot describe without
Recommended publications
  • Cosmic Questions, Answers Pending
    special section | cosmic questions, Answers pending Cosmic questions, answers pending throughout human history, great missions of mission reveal the exploration have been inspired by curiosity, : the desire to find out about unknown realms. secrets of the universe such missions have taken explorers across wide oceans and far below their surfaces, THE OBJECTIVE deep into jungles, high onto mountain peaks For millennia, people have turned to the heavens in search of clues to nature’s mysteries. truth seekers from ages past to the present day and over vast stretches of ice to the earth’s have found that the earth is not the center of the universe, that polar extremities. countless galaxies dot the abyss of space, that an unknown form of today’s greatest exploratory mission is no matter and dark forces are at work in shaping the cosmos. Yet despite longer earthbound. it’s the scientific quest to these heroic efforts, big cosmological questions remain unresolved: explain the cosmos, to answer the grandest What happened before the Big Bang? ............................... Page 22 questions about the universe as a whole. What is the universe made of? ......................................... Page 24 what is the identity, for example, of the Is there a theory of everything? ....................................... Page 26 Are space and time fundamental? .................................... Page 28 “dark” ingredients in the cosmic recipe, com- What is the fate of the universe? ..................................... Page 30 posing 95 percent of the
    [Show full text]
  • Inflation and the Theory of Cosmological Perturbations
    Inflation and the Theory of Cosmological Perturbations A. Riotto INFN, Sezione di Padova, via Marzolo 8, I-35131, Padova, Italy. Abstract These lectures provide a pedagogical introduction to inflation and the theory of cosmological per- turbations generated during inflation which are thought to be the origin of structure in the universe. Lectures given at the: Summer School on arXiv:hep-ph/0210162v2 30 Jan 2017 Astroparticle Physics and Cosmology Trieste, 17 June - 5 July 2002 1 Notation A few words on the metric notation. We will be using the convention (−; +; +; +), even though we might switch time to time to the other option (+; −; −; −). This might happen for our convenience, but also for pedagogical reasons. Students should not be shielded too much against the phenomenon of changes of convention and notation in books and articles. Units We will adopt natural, or high energy physics, units. There is only one fundamental dimension, energy, after setting ~ = c = kb = 1, [Energy] = [Mass] = [Temperature] = [Length]−1 = [Time]−1 : The most common conversion factors and quantities we will make use of are 1 GeV−1 = 1:97 × 10−14 cm=6:59 × 10−25 sec, 1 Mpc= 3.08×1024 cm=1.56×1038 GeV−1, 19 MPl = 1:22 × 10 GeV, −1 −1 −42 H0= 100 h Km sec Mpc =2.1 h × 10 GeV, 2 −29 −3 2 4 −3 2 −47 4 ρc = 1:87h · 10 g cm = 1:05h · 10 eV cm = 8:1h × 10 GeV , −13 T0 = 2:75 K=2.3×10 GeV, 2 Teq = 5:5(Ω0h ) eV, Tls = 0:26 (T0=2:75 K) eV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmos - Before the Big Bang
    From issue 2601 of New Scientist magazine, 28 April 2007, page 28-33 The cosmos - before the big bang How did the universe begin? The question is as old as humanity. Sure, we know that something like the big bang happened, but the theory doesn't explain some of the most important bits: why it happened, what the conditions were at the time, and other imponderables. Many cosmologists think our standard picture of how the universe came to be is woefully incomplete or even plain wrong, and they have been dreaming up a host of strange alternatives to explain how we got here. For the first time, they are trying to pin down the initial conditions of the big bang. In particular, they want to solve the long-standing mystery of how the universe could have begun in such a well- ordered state, as fundamental physics implies, when it seems utter chaos should have reigned. Several models have emerged that propose intriguing answers to this question. One says the universe began as a dense sea of black holes. Another says the big bang was sparked by a collision between two membranes floating in higher-dimensional space. Yet another says our universe was originally ripped from a larger entity, and that in turn countless baby universes will be born from the wreckage of ours. Crucially, each scenario makes unique and testable predictions; observations coming online in the next few years should help us to decide which, if any, is correct. Not that modelling the origin of the universe is anything new.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Cosmology of the Big Rip: Within GR and in a Modified Theory of Gravity
    universe Conference Report Quantum Cosmology of the Big Rip: Within GR and in a Modified Theory of Gravity Mariam Bouhmadi-López 1,2,*, Imanol Albarran 3,4 and Che-Yu Chen 5,6 1 Department of Theoretical Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, P.O. Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain 2 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain 3 Departamento de Física, Universidade da Beira Interior, Rua Marquês D’Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal; [email protected] 4 Centro de Matemática e Aplicações da Universidade da Beira Interior (CMA-UBI), Rua Marquês D’Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal 5 Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, 10617 Taipei, Taiwan; [email protected] 6 LeCosPA, National Taiwan University, 10617 Taipei, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editors: Mariusz P. D ˛abrowski, Manuel Krämer and Vincenzo Salzano Received: 8 March 2017; Accepted: 12 April 2017; Published: 14 April 2017 Abstract: Quantum gravity is the theory that is expected to successfully describe systems that are under strong gravitational effects while at the same time being of an extreme quantum nature. When this principle is applied to the universe as a whole, we use what is commonly named “quantum cosmology”. So far we do not have a definite quantum theory of gravity or cosmology, but we have several promising approaches. Here we will review the application of the Wheeler–DeWitt formalism to the late-time universe, where it might face a Big Rip future singularity. The Big Rip singularity is the most virulent future dark energy singularity which can happen not only in general relativity but also in some modified theories of gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Black holes, vacuum decay and thermodynamics CUSPINERA-CONTRERAS, JUAN,LEOPOLDO How to cite: CUSPINERA-CONTRERAS, JUAN,LEOPOLDO (2020) Black holes, vacuum decay and thermodynamics, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13421/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Black holes, vacuum decay and thermodynamics Juan Leopoldo Cuspinera Contreras A Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Department of Physics University of Durham England September 2019 To my family Black holes, vacuum decay and thermodynamics Juan Leopoldo Cuspinera Contreras Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2019 Abstract In this thesis we study two fairly different aspects of gravity: vacuum decay seeded by black holes and black hole thermodynamics. The first part of this work is devoted to the study of black holes within the (higher dimensional) Randall- Sundrum braneworld scenario and their effect on vacuum decay rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter and the Early Universe: a Review Arxiv:2104.11488V1 [Hep-Ph
    Dark matter and the early Universe: a review A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi Univ Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, Institut de Physique des 2 Infinis de Lyon, UMR 5822, 69622 Villeurbanne, France Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Institut Universitaire de France, 103 boulevard Saint-Michel, 75005 Paris, France Abstract Dark matter represents currently an outstanding problem in both cosmology and particle physics. In this review we discuss the possible explanations for dark matter and the experimental observables which can eventually lead to the discovery of dark matter and its nature, and demonstrate the close interplay between the cosmological properties of the early Universe and the observables used to constrain dark matter models in the context of new physics beyond the Standard Model. arXiv:2104.11488v1 [hep-ph] 23 Apr 2021 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Standard Cosmological Model 3 2.1 Friedmann-Lema^ıtre-Robertson-Walker model . 4 2.2 A quick story of the Universe . 5 2.3 Big-Bang nucleosynthesis . 8 3 Dark matter(s) 9 3.1 Observational evidences . 9 3.1.1 Galaxies . 9 3.1.2 Galaxy clusters . 10 3.1.3 Large and cosmological scales . 12 3.2 Generic types of dark matter . 14 4 Beyond the standard cosmological model 16 4.1 Dark energy . 17 4.2 Inflation and reheating . 19 4.3 Other models . 20 4.4 Phase transitions . 21 5 Dark matter in particle physics 21 5.1 Dark matter and new physics . 22 5.1.1 Thermal relics . 22 5.1.2 Non-thermal relics .
    [Show full text]
  • Eternal Inflation and Its Implications
    IOP PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A: MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 (2007) 6811–6826 doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/25/S25 Eternal inflation and its implications Alan H Guth Center for Theoretical Physics, Laboratory for Nuclear Science, and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA E-mail: [email protected] Received 8 February 2006 Published 6 June 2007 Online at stacks.iop.org/JPhysA/40/6811 Abstract Isummarizetheargumentsthatstronglysuggestthatouruniverseisthe product of inflation. The mechanisms that lead to eternal inflation in both new and chaotic models are described. Although the infinity of pocket universes produced by eternal inflation are unobservable, it is argued that eternal inflation has real consequences in terms of the way that predictions are extracted from theoretical models. The ambiguities in defining probabilities in eternally inflating spacetimes are reviewed, with emphasis on the youngness paradox that results from a synchronous gauge regularization technique. Although inflation is generically eternal into the future, it is not eternal into the past: it can be proven under reasonable assumptions that the inflating region must be incomplete in past directions, so some physics other than inflation is needed to describe the past boundary of the inflating region. PACS numbers: 98.80.cQ, 98.80.Bp, 98.80.Es 1. Introduction: the successes of inflation Since the proposal of the inflationary model some 25 years ago [1–4], inflation has been remarkably successful in explaining many important qualitative and quantitative properties of the universe. In this paper, I will summarize the key successes, and then discuss a number of issues associated with the eternal nature of inflation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Correspondence Between Strings in the Hagedorn Phase and Asymptotically De Sitter Space
    A correspondence between strings in the Hagedorn phase and asymptotically de Sitter space Ram Brustein(1), A.J.M. Medved(2;3) (1) Department of Physics, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel (2) Department of Physics & Electronics, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa (3) National Institute for Theoretical Physics (NITheP), Western Cape 7602, South Africa [email protected], [email protected] Abstract A correspondence between closed strings in their high-temperature Hage- dorn phase and asymptotically de Sitter (dS) space is established. We identify a thermal, conformal field theory (CFT) whose partition function is, on the one hand, equal to the partition function of closed, interacting, fundamental strings in their Hagedorn phase yet is, on the other hand, also equal to the Hartle-Hawking (HH) wavefunction of an asymptotically dS Universe. The Lagrangian of the CFT is a functional of a single scalar field, the condensate of a thermal scalar, which is proportional to the entropy density of the strings. The correspondence has some aspects in common with the anti-de Sitter/CFT correspondence, as well as with some of its proposed analytic continuations to a dS/CFT correspondence, but it also has some important conceptual and technical differences. The equilibrium state of the CFT is one of maximal pres- sure and entropy, and it is at a temperature that is above but parametrically close to the Hagedorn temperature. The CFT is valid beyond the regime of semiclassical gravity and thus defines the initial quantum state of the dS Uni- verse in a way that replaces and supersedes the HH wavefunction.
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuated Eternal Inflation Via Ads/CFT
    BROWN-HET-1593 Punctuated eternal inflation via AdS/CFT David A. Lowe† and Shubho Roy†♮♯∗ †Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA ♮Physics Department City College of the CUNY New York, NY 10031, USA and ♯Department of Physics and Astronomy Lehman College of the CUNY Bronx, NY 10468, USA Abstract The work is an attempt to model a scenario of inflation in the framework of Anti de Sit- ter/Conformal Field theory (AdS/CFT) duality, a potentially complete nonperturbative description of quantum gravity via string theory. We look at bubble geometries with de Sitter interiors within an ambient Schwarzschild anti-de Sitter black hole spacetime and obtain a characterization for the states in the dual CFT on boundary of the asymptotic AdS which code the expanding dS bubble. These can then in turn be used to specify initial conditions for cosmology. Our scenario naturally interprets the entropy of de Sitter space as a (logarithm of) subspace of states of the black hole microstates. Consistency checks are performed and a number of implications regarding cosmology are discussed including how the key problems or paradoxes of conventional eternal inflation are overcome. arXiv:1004.1402v1 [hep-th] 8 Apr 2010 ∗Electronic address: [email protected], [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION Making contact with realistic cosmology remains the fundamental challenge for any can- didate unified theory of matter and gravity. Precise observations [1, 2] indicate that the current epoch of the acceleration of universe is driven by a very mild (in Planck units) neg- ative pressure, positive energy density constituent - “dark energy”.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Big Bounce in Einstein--Cartan Cosmology
    Analysis of big bounce in Einstein{Cartan cosmology Jordan L. Cubero∗ and Nikodem J. Poplawski y Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of New Haven, 300 Boston Post Road, West Haven, CT 06516, USA We analyze the dynamics of a homogeneous and isotropic universe in the Einstein{Cartan theory of gravity. The spin of fermions produces spacetime torsion that prevents gravitational singularities and replaces the big bang with a nonsingular big bounce. We show that a closed universe exists only when a particular function of its scale factor and temperature is higher than some threshold value, whereas an open and a flat universes do not have such a restriction. We also show that a bounce of the scale factor is double: as the temperature increases and then decreases, the scale factor decreases, increases, decreases, and then increases. Introduction. The Einstein{Cartan (EC) theory of a size where the cosmological constant starts cosmic ac- gravity provides the simplest mechanism generating a celeration. This expansion also predicts the cosmic mi- nonsingular big bounce, without unknown parameters crowave background radiation parameters that are con- or hypothetical fields [1]. EC is the simplest and most sistent with the Planck 2015 observations [11], as was natural theory of gravity with torsion, in which the La- shown in [12]. grangian density for the gravitational field is proportional The spin-fluid description of matter is the particle ap- to the Ricci scalar, as in general relativity [2, 3]. The con- proximation of the multipole expansion of the integrated sistency of the conservation law for the total (orbital plus conservation laws in EC.
    [Show full text]
  • From Space, a New View of Doomsday
    Past 30 Days Welcome, kamion This page is print-ready, and this article will remain available for 90 days. Instructions for Saving | About this Service | Purchase History February 17, 2004, Tuesday SCIENCE DESK From Space, A New View Of Doomsday By DENNIS OVERBYE (NYT) 2646 words Once upon a time, if you wanted to talk about the end of the universe you had a choice, as Robert Frost put it, between fire and ice. Either the universe would collapse under its own weight one day, in a fiery ''big crunch,'' or the galaxies, now flying outward from each other, would go on coasting outward forever, forever slowing, but never stopping while the cosmos grew darker and darker, colder and colder, as the stars gradually burned out like tired bulbs. Now there is the Big Rip. Recent astronomical measurements, scientists say, cannot rule out the possibility that in a few billion years a mysterious force permeating space-time will be strong enough to blow everything apart, shred rocks, animals, molecules and finally even atoms in a last seemingly mad instant of cosmic self-abnegation. ''In some ways it sounds more like science fiction than fact,'' said Dr. Robert Caldwell, a Dartmouth physicist who described this apocalyptic possibility in a paper with Dr. Marc Kamionkowski and Dr. Nevin Weinberg, from the California Institute of Technology, last year. The Big Rip is only one of a constellation of doomsday possibilities resulting from the discovery by two teams of astronomers six years ago that a mysterious force called dark energy seems to be wrenching the universe apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Yasunori Nomura
    Yasunori Nomura UC Berkeley; LBNL Why is the universe as we see today? ― Mathematics requires — “We require” Dramatic change of the view Our universe is only a part of the “multiverse” … suggested both from observation and theory This comes with revolutionary change of the view on spacetime and gravity • Holographic principle • Horizon complementarity • Multiverse as quantum many worlds • … … implications on particle physics and cosmology Shocking news in 1998 Supernova cosmology project; Supernova search team Universe is accelerating! ≠ 0 ! Particle Data Group (2010) 2 2 4 4 … natural size of ≡ MPl (naively) ~ MPl (at the very least ~ TeV ) Observationally, -3 4 120 ~ (10 eV) Naïve estimates O(10 ) too large Also, ~ matter — Why now? Nonzero value completely changes the view ! 4 Natural size for vacuum energy ~ MPl 4 • 4 -MPl 0 -120 4 MPl ,obs ~10 MPl Unnatural (Note: = 0 is NOT special from theoretical point of view) Wait! Is it really unnatural to observe this value? • No observer0 No observer It is quite “natural” to observe ,obs, as long as different values of are “sampled” Weinberg (’87) Many universes ─ multiverse ─ needed • String landscape Compact (six) dimensins ex. O(100) fields with O(10) minima each → huge number of vacua → O(10100) vacua • Eternal inflation Inflation is (generically) future eternal → populate all the vacua Anthropic considerations mandatory (not an option) Full of “miracles” Examples: • yu,d,e v ~ QCD ~ O(0.01) QCD … otherwise, no nuclear physics or chemistry (Conservative) estimate of the probability: P « 10-3 • Baryon ~ DM …. Some of them anthropic (and some may not) Implications? • Observational / experimental (test, new scenarios, …) • Fundamental physics (spacetime, gravity, …) Full of “miracles” Examples: • yu,d,e v ~ QCD ~ O(0.01) QCD … otherwise, no nuclear physics or chemistry (Conservative) estimate of the probability: P « 10-3 • Baryon ~ DM ….
    [Show full text]