NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY Assisting Frog

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY Assisting Frog NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY Assisting Frog Identification in Costa Rica Using a Mobile App THESIS Submitted to the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS Justin Tyler Laplante 2021 THESIS Submitted to the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS Justin Tyler Laplante 2021 Assisting Frog Identification in Costa Rica Using a Mobile App Author: ____________________________________________________________ Justin Tyler Laplante Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dale Hamilton, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty Advisor Approved: ____________________________________________________________ John Cossel Jr., Ph.D., Professor, Chair, Department of Biology Second Reader Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Barry L. Myers, Ph.D., Chair, Department of Mathematics & Computer Science ABSTRACT Assisting Frog Identification in Costa Rica Using a Mobile App. LAPLANTE, JUSTIN (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science). Quickly identifying a single frog species from over a hundred other possible species can be a challenge for research while in the Costa Rican jungle. Though researchers can use field guides to assist, these still mean you may have look through all currently identified frog species to find the frog being viewed. This project was created to help researchers narrow the list of possible frog species quickly based on Geolocation. Using Xamarin.Forms, an app was developed that worked offline, used an ArcGIS API and was cross platform. However, to ensure performs and accuracy certain design choices were made for designing the ArcGIS map that was used within the app. The used geospatial data for the frog species and generalized it into a hexagonal pattern. For the app to handle the frog and app data using xml and the MVVM Architectural pattern. iii Acknowledgement I would like to thank my parents for giving me the wonderful opportunity of going to college. I would like to thank Dr. Myers, Dr. Hamilton, and Prof. McCarty for being excellent professors in all the computer science classes and teaching me more than I know what to do with. I would like to thank Dr. Cossel for giving me a senior project that I really enjoyed working on and showed me how much I have yet to learn. Finally, I want to thank my first three years of excellent roommates in college, I never knew how lucky I was to have each one of them until senior year when I didn’t have them. iv Table of Contents Title ................................................................................................................................................... i Signature Page ................................................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Figures: ............................................................................................................................. vii Overview: ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Overview: ..................................................................................................................... 1 Application Requirements: ...................................................................................................... 1 Design Choices: ............................................................................................................................ 1 Designing Application: ............................................................................................................. 1 Application Development Framework: .................................................................................... 2 Application Data Design Pattern: ............................................................................................. 3 Designing a custom ArcGIS Map: ............................................................................................. 6 Development: .............................................................................................................................. 7 Application Views:.................................................................................................................... 7 Final Remarks ............................................................................................................................... 9 Complications: ......................................................................................................................... 9 Future Work: .......................................................................................................................... 10 Conclusion: ............................................................................................................................. 10 Appendix A: Models ................................................................................................................... 13 FrogSpecies.cs ........................................................................................................................ 13 Appendix B: Services .................................................................................................................. 14 FrogSpeciesDataStore.cs ........................................................................................................ 14 ISpeciesButtonStorage.cs ....................................................................................................... 15 Appendix C: ViewModel ............................................................................................................. 16 BaseViewModel.cs ................................................................................................................. 16 FrogDetailViewModel.cs ........................................................................................................ 17 MainPageViewModel.cs......................................................................................................... 18 MapPageViewModel.cs ......................................................................................................... 19 NearbyFrogsViewModel.cs .................................................................................................... 20 ShellViewModel.cs ................................................................................................................. 22 Appendix D: Views ..................................................................................................................... 23 v FrogDetailPage.xaml .............................................................................................................. 23 FrogDetailPage.xaml.cs .......................................................................................................... 23 MainPage.xaml....................................................................................................................... 24 MainPage.xaml.cs .................................................................................................................. 24 MapPage.xaml ....................................................................................................................... 25 MapPage.xaml.cs ................................................................................................................... 25 NearbyFrogsPage.xaml .......................................................................................................... 26 NearbyFrogsPage.xaml.cs ...................................................................................................... 27 Appendix E: App shell ................................................................................................................ 29 App.xaml ................................................................................................................................ 29 App.xaml.cs ............................................................................................................................ 29 AppShell.xaml ........................................................................................................................ 30 AppShell.xaml.cs .................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix F: FrogSpeciesInfo ...................................................................................................... 32 FrogSpeciesInfoXML.xml ........................................................................................................ 32 vi Table of Figures: 1 – Adobe XD storyboard ....................................................................................................2 2 – MVC Process .................................................................................................................4 3 – MVP Process ..................................................................................................................5 4 – MVVM Process .............................................................................................................5
Recommended publications
  • A Collection of Amphibians from Río San Juan, Southeastern Nicaragua
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264789493 A collection of amphibians from Río San Juan, southeastern Nicaragua Article in Herpetology Notes · January 2009 CITATIONS READS 12 188 4 authors, including: Javier Sunyer Matthias Dehling University of Canterbury 89 PUBLICATIONS 209 CITATIONS 54 PUBLICATIONS 967 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Gunther Köhler Senckenberg Research Institute 222 PUBLICATIONS 1,617 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Zoological Research in Strict Forest Reserves in Hesse, Germany View project Diploma Thesis View project All content following this page was uploaded by Javier Sunyer on 16 August 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Herpetology Notes, volume 2: 189-202 (2009) (published online on 29 October 2009) A collection of amphibians from Río San Juan, southeastern Nicaragua Javier Sunyer1,2,3*, Guillermo Páiz4, David Matthias Dehling1, Gunther Köhler1 Abstract. We report upon the amphibians collected during seven expeditions carried out between the years 2000–2006 to thirteen localities in both Refugio de Vida Silvestre Río San Juan and Reserva Biológica Indio-Maíz, southeastern Nicaragua. We include morphometric data of around one-half of the adult specimens in the collection, and provide a brief general overview and discuss zoogeographic and conservation considerations of the amphibians known to occur in the Río San Juan area. Keywords. Amphibia, conservation, ecology, morphometry, zoogeography. Introduction potential of holding America’s first interoceanic channel and also because it was part of the sea route to travel The San Juan River is an approximately 200 km slow- from eastern to western United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Dedicated to the Conservation and Biological Research of Costa Rican Amphibians”
    “Dedicated to the Conservation and Biological Research of Costa Rican Amphibians” A male Crowned Tree Frog (Anotheca spinosa) peering out from a tree hole. 2 Text by: Brian Kubicki Photography by: Brian Kubicki Version: 3.1 (October 12th, 2009) Mailing Address: Apdo. 81-7200, Siquirres, Provincia de Limón, Costa Rica Telephone: (506)-8889-0655, (506)-8841-5327 Web: www.cramphibian.com Email: [email protected] Cover Photo: Mountain Glass Frog (Sachatamia ilex), Quebrada Monge, C.R.A.R.C. Reserve. 3 Costa Rica is internationally recognized as one of the most biologically diverse countries on the planet in total species numbers for many taxonomic groups of flora and fauna, one of those being amphibians. Costa Rica has 190 species of amphibians known from within its tiny 51,032 square kilometers territory. With 3.72 amphibian species per 1,000 sq. km. of national territory, Costa Rica is one of the richest countries in the world regarding amphibian diversity density. Amphibians are under constant threat by contamination, deforestation, climatic change, and disease. The majority of Costa Rica’s amphibians are surrounded by mystery in regards to their basic biology and roles in the ecology. Through intense research in the natural environment and in captivity many important aspects of their biology and conservation can become better known. The Costa Rican Amphibian Research Center (C.R.A.R.C.) was established in 2002, and is a privately owned and operated conservational and biological research center dedicated to studying, understanding, and conserving one of the most ecologically important animal groups of Neotropical humid forest ecosystems, that of the amphibians.
    [Show full text]
  • Witnessing Extinction in Real Time
    PERSPECTIVE Witnessing extinction in real time Karen R. Lips* University of Maryland, Department of Biology, College Park, Maryland, United States of America * [email protected] This Perspective is part of the Conservation Stories from the Front Lines Collection I started my amphibian research a little like Thoreau, living alone in a cabin in the woods and recording the seasonal variation in the natural world. I lived in a shack without plumbing or electricity, an hour away from the closest house, in a cloud forest on the top of a mountain that straddled the border between Costa Rica and Panama. I scrambled along mountain streams chasing seasonal reproductive data on treefrogs. The species I studied, Isthmohyla calypsa, a1111111111 remains one of the most spectacular frogs I have ever seen; adults were a brilliant, iridescent a1111111111 green with a bright white throat pouch, and their skin was as textured as the spikey moss they a1111111111 lived on, apparently camouflaging them from predators [1]. a1111111111 I was living a field biologist's dream and expected to spend my career studying tropical a1111111111 montane amphibians in one of the most beautiful and least studied regions in the world. I couldn't know that my study site in this remote cloud forest would give me a front row seat to one of the most distressing ecological mysteries of our time. As a graduate student, I had heard the ominous reports describing the mysterious disap- pearances of amphibian populations around the world. At the time, scientists were debating OPEN ACCESS whether this was a real phenomenon, what might cause it, and whether these events were Citation: Lips KR (2018) Witnessing extinction in connected.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Frog-Diverse Place in Middle America, with Notes on The
    Offcial journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(2) [Special Section]: 304–322 (e215). The most frog-diverse place in Middle America, with notes on the conservation status of eight threatened species of amphibians 1,2,*José Andrés Salazar-Zúñiga, 1,2,3Wagner Chaves-Acuña, 2Gerardo Chaves, 1Alejandro Acuña, 1,2Juan Ignacio Abarca-Odio, 1,4Javier Lobon-Rovira, 1,2Edwin Gómez-Méndez, 1,2Ana Cecilia Gutiérrez-Vannucchi, and 2Federico Bolaños 1Veragua Foundation for Rainforest Research, Limón, COSTA RICA 2Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, 11501-2060 San José, COSTA RICA 3División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’-CONICET, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA 4CIBIO Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, PORTUGAL Abstract.—Regarding amphibians, Costa Rica exhibits the greatest species richness per unit area in Middle America, with a total of 215 species reported to date. However, this number is likely an underestimate due to the presence of many unexplored areas that are diffcult to access. Between 2012 and 2017, a monitoring survey of amphibians was conducted in the Central Caribbean of Costa Rica, on the northern edge of the Matama mountains in the Talamanca mountain range, to study the distribution patterns and natural history of species across this region, particularly those considered as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. The results show the highest amphibian species richness among Middle America lowland evergreen forests, with a notable anuran representation of 64 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Morphology of the Pristimantis Leptolophus Species Group
    Zootaxa 4243 (1): 042–074 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4243.1.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4D35FB5-BC82-426C-BFCF-4EEF4D6EAFE6 Phylogenetic relationships and morphology of the Pristimantis leptolophus species group (Amphibia: Anura: Brachycephaloidea), with the recognition of a new species group in Pristimantis Jiménez de la Espada, 1870 GUSTAVO A. GONZÁLEZ-DURÁN1, MARIANE TARGINO2, MARCO RADA2 & TARAN GRANT2,3 1Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Laboratorio de Anfibios, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia, 111321 2Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05508-090 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We evaluate the monophyly and phylogenetic relationships of the Pristimantis leptolophus species group and describe its external morphology, osteology, and some myological characteristics. We also compare the P. leptolophus species group to other related species groups. The P. leptolophus group is not monophyletic due to the inclusion of P. acatallelus, for- merly believed to be part of the P. devillei group. The revised P. leptolophus group is composed of nine named species and six unnamed species. Based on our results, we recognize a new species group, the P. boulengeri species group, com- posed of eight species, many of which were previously assigned to the P. lacrimosus species group. Key words: Craugastoridae, myology, osteology, phylogeny, systematics, terrarana Introduction With 494 species of Neotropical, direct-developing frogs (Frost, 2016), Pristimantis Jiménez de La Espada, 1870 is the richest genus of vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Taller Para Revisar La Lista Roja De Anfibios De Costa Rica De La UICN
    Taller para Revisar la Lista Roja de Anfibios de Costa Rica de la UICN y Evaluación del Cumplimiento de las Acciones de la Estrategia de Conservación de los Anfibios de Costa Rica 3-4 de agosto, 2010 Escuela de Biología Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica Informe Final Organizado por Bolaños, F., G. Chaves, J. E. Rodríguez, B. Young & Y. Matamoros (Eds.) 2010. Taller para Revisar la Lista Roja de Anfibios de Costa Rica de la UICN y Evaluación del Cumplimiento de las Acciones de la Estrategia de Conservación de los Anfibios de Costa Rica. 3-4 de agosto, 2010. Escuela de Biología de la Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica. Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC/IUCN)/CBSG Mesoamerica. Foto portada: Incilius holdridgei. José Andrés Salazar. Una contribución del Grupo de Especialistas en Conservación y Reproducción (CBSG) SSC/UICN. CBSG, SSC y UICN, promueven talleres y otros foros para el análisis y consideración de problemas relativos a la conservación, y considera que los informes de estas reuniones son de gran utilidad cuando son distribuidos extensamente. Las opiniones y recomendaciones expresadas en este informe reflejan los asuntos discutidos y las ideas expresadas por los participantes del taller y no necesariamente refleja la opinión o la posición de CBSG, SSC o UICN. Copias adicionales de esta publicación se pueden ordenar a través de: IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (CBSG), 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124. E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cbsg.org
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist of Amphibian Species Listed in the CITES
    CoP17 Doc. 81.1 Annex 5 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of Amphibian Species listed in the CITES Appendices and the Annexes of EC Regulation 338/97 Species information extracted from FROST, D. R. (2015) "Amphibian Species of the World, an online Reference" V. 6.0 (as of May 2015) Copyright © 1998-2015, Darrel Frost and TheAmericanMuseum of Natural History. All Rights Reserved. Additional comments included by the Nomenclature Specialist of the CITES Animals Committee (indicated by "NC comment") Reproduction for commercial purposes prohibited. CoP17 Doc. 81.1 Annex 5 - p. 1 Amphibian Species covered by this Checklist listed by listed by CITES EC- as well as Family Species Regulation EC 338/97 Regulation only 338/97 ANURA Aromobatidae Allobates femoralis X Aromobatidae Allobates hodli X Aromobatidae Allobates myersi X Aromobatidae Allobates zaparo X Aromobatidae Anomaloglossus rufulus X Bufonidae Altiphrynoides malcolmi X Bufonidae Altiphrynoides osgoodi X Bufonidae Amietophrynus channingi X Bufonidae Amietophrynus superciliaris X Bufonidae Atelopus zeteki X Bufonidae Incilius periglenes X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides asperginis X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides cryptus X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides frontierei X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides laevis X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides laticeps X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides minutus X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides paulae X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides poyntoni X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides pseudotornieri X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides tornieri X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides vestergaardi
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetology at the Isthmus Species Checklist
    Herpetology at the Isthmus Species Checklist AMPHIBIANS BUFONIDAE true toads Atelopus zeteki Panamanian Golden Frog Incilius coniferus Green Climbing Toad Incilius signifer Panama Dry Forest Toad Rhaebo haematiticus Truando Toad (Litter Toad) Rhinella alata South American Common Toad Rhinella granulosa Granular Toad Rhinella margaritifera South American Common Toad Rhinella marina Cane Toad CENTROLENIDAE glass frogs Cochranella euknemos Fringe-limbed Glass Frog Cochranella granulosa Grainy Cochran Frog Espadarana prosoblepon Emerald Glass Frog Sachatamia albomaculata Yellow-flecked Glass Frog Sachatamia ilex Ghost Glass Frog Teratohyla pulverata Chiriqui Glass Frog Teratohyla spinosa Spiny Cochran Frog Hyalinobatrachium chirripoi Suretka Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium colymbiphyllum Plantation Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni Fleischmann’s Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium valeroi Reticulated Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium vireovittatum Starrett’s Glass Frog CRAUGASTORIDAE robber frogs Craugastor bransfordii Bransford’s Robber Frog Craugastor crassidigitus Isla Bonita Robber Frog Craugastor fitzingeri Fitzinger’s Robber Frog Craugastor gollmeri Evergreen Robber Frog Craugastor megacephalus Veragua Robber Frog Craugastor noblei Noble’s Robber Frog Craugastor stejnegerianus Stejneger’s Robber Frog Craugastor tabasarae Tabasara Robber Frog Craugastor talamancae Almirante Robber Frog DENDROBATIDAE poison dart frogs Allobates talamancae Striped (Talamanca) Rocket Frog Colostethus panamensis Panama Rocket Frog Colostethus pratti Pratt’s Rocket
    [Show full text]
  • Shifts in the Diversity of an Amphibian Community from a Premontane Forest of San Ramón, Costa Rica Cambios En La Diversidad De
    DOI 10.15517/RBT.V67I2SUPL.37240 Artículo Shifts in the diversity of an amphibian community from a premontane forest of San Ramón, Costa Rica Cambios en la diversidad de una comunidad de anfibios en un bosque premontano de San Ramón, Costa Rica Víctor J. Acosta-Chaves1, 2* Víctor Madrigal-Elizondo3 Gerardo Chaves4 Brayan Morera-Chacón5 Adrián García-Rodríguez 4, 6 Federico Bolaños 4 1 Carrera de Turismo Ecológico, Universidad de Costa Rica Sede Atlántico, Recinto de Paraíso, Cartago, Costa Rica; [email protected]* 2 Red Mesoamericana y del Caribe para la Conservación de Anfibios y Reptiles. 3 Red de Áreas Protegidas, Universidad de Costa Rica, Sede Rodrigo Facio, San Pedro, Costa Rica; [email protected] 4 Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, 11501-2060 San José, Costa Rica; [email protected], [email protected] 5 Instituto Internacional para la Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica; [email protected] 6 Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence Received 05-X-2018 Corrected 18-I-2019 Accepted 06-II-2019 Abstract Biological communities are experiencing rapid shifts of composition in Neotropical ecosystems due to several factors causing population declines. However, emerging evidence has provided insights on the adaptive potential of multiple species to respond to illnesses and environmental pressures. In Costa Rica, the decline of amphibian populations is a remarkable example of these changes. Here we provide evidence of variation in the amphibian richness of a premontane forest of San Ramón (Costa Rica) across a ~30 year period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Tropical Dry Forest As a Long-Term Barrier to Dispersal: a Comparative Phylogeographical Analysis of Dry Forest Tolerant and Intolerant Frogs
    Molecular Ecology (2007) 16,4789^807 doi:10.1111/j.l365-294X.2007.03524.x The role of tropical dry forest as a long-term barrier to dispersal: a comparative phylogeographical analysis of dry forest tolerant and intolerant frogs ANDREW J. CRAWFORD,* ELDREDGE BERMINGHAM* and CAROLINA POLANÍA S.t *Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0840-0309, Balboa, Ancón, Panama, and -^Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Apartado 7495, Bogotá, Colombia Abstract We used a comparative phylogeographical approach to investigate the origins of the disjunct wet forest biota of the Golfo Dulce region along the Pacific slope of Costa Rica. This region is isolated by Pacific dry forests north and south and isolated from Caribbean wet forests by mountains. We studied three sympatric lowland frog species in the Craugastor fitzingeri species group that prefer wet forest but differ in their response to dry habitats. In dry forest, C. fitzingeri can survive along streams while C. crassidigitus and C. talamancae are entirely absent. We collected samples from across the ranges of all three species, and obtained mitochondrial DNA sequence data from the COI and cytochrome b genes. We observed significant phylogeographical structure in C. crassidigitus and C. talamancae, but much less in C. fitzingeri, demonstrating that mountain barriers and dry forest habitat have reduced mitochondrial gene flow in the strictly wet-forest species. Additionally, we discovered that the Golfo Dulce and Central Panama populations of C crassidigitus appear to have diverged in the Pliocene or earlier, suggesting that the dry forest separating these popula- tions is old. Our phylogenetic analysis of 12 of approximately 16 species of the C.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information Tables
    Mapping the Global Emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the Amphibian Chytrid Fungus Deanna H. Olson, David M. Aanensen, Kathryn L. Ronnenberg, Christopher I. Powell, Susan F. Walker, Jon Bielby, Trenton W. J. Garner, George Weaver, the Bd Mapping Group, and Matthew C. Fisher Supplemental Information Taxonomic Notes Genera were assigned to families for summarization (Table 1 in main text) and analysis (Table 2 in main text) based on the most recent available comprehensive taxonomic references (Frost et al. 2006, Frost 2008, Frost 2009, Frost 2011). We chose recent family designations to explore patterns of Bd susceptibility and occurrence because these classifications were based on both genetic and morphological data, and hence may more likely yield meaningful inference. Some North American species were assigned to genus according to Crother (2008), and dendrobatid frogs were assigned to family and genus based on Grant et al. (2006). Eleutherodactylid frogs were assigned to family and genus based on Hedges et al. (2008); centrolenid frogs based on Cisneros-Heredia et al. (2007). For the eleutherodactylid frogs of Central and South America and the Caribbean, older sources count them among the Leptodactylidae, whereas Frost et al. (2006) put them in the family Brachycephalidae. More recent work (Heinicke et al. 2007) suggests that most of the genera that were once “Eleutherodactylus” (including those species currently assigned to the genera Eleutherodactylus, Craugastor, Euhyas, Phrynopus, and Pristimantis and assorted others), may belong in a separate, or even several different new families. Subsequent work (Hedges et al. 2008) has divided them among three families, the Craugastoridae, the Eleutherodactylidae, and the Strabomantidae, which were used in our classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Vocal Behavior of the Explosively Breeding Neotropical Yellow Toad, Incilius Luetkenii
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 50, No. 4, 502–508, 2016 Copyright 2016 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Vocal Behavior of the Explosively Breeding Neotropical Yellow Toad, Incilius luetkenii 1,2 1 1,2 NICK REHBERG-BESLER, STEPHANIE M. DOUCET, AND DANIEL J. MENNILL 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada ABSTRACT.—Frogs and toads exhibit complex vocal behavior, often in the context of mating and resource defense. Although over 6,500 species of frogs and toads have been described, detailed accounts of vocal behavior exist for very few species. In this study, we provide the first detailed investigation of the vocal behavior of Neotropical Yellow Toads, Incilius luetkenii, based on recordings collected from animals in northwestern Costa Rica. We provide quantitative measurements of two call types, we test the hypothesis that male body size is related to the structure of male calls, we investigate the context in which males produce calls, and we discuss the importance of their vocal behavior in the framework of an aggressive scramble competition mating system. We found that male I. luetkenii produce two vocalizations during their explosive breeding aggregations: advertisement calls and release calls. Advertisement calls are 2.5 sec-long vocalizations consisting of a series of pulses. Release calls are 0.6 sec-long vocalizations consisting of a small number of pulses and produced when other males attempt amplexus on them. As predicted, spectral properties of advertisement calls were inversely related to body size. Video analysis of male calling behavior revealed a call rate of 0.58 calls per minute and revealed that most advertisement calls occur within 2 sec following a contact with another male.
    [Show full text]