PALEOPEDOLOGY OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MIDDLE PASSAIC FORMATION, NEWARK SUPERGROUP, POTTSTOWN, PA
A Thesis Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board
In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science
By Steven Booty August 2013
______Dr. Dennis O. Terry, Jr., Advisor
______Dr. Allison R. Tumarkin-Deratzian
______Dr. David E. Grandstaff ABSTRACT
Cyclic stratigraphy has been recognized in the Newark Basin for many years.
Each package, referred to as a Van Houten Cycle (VHC), generally has three divisions: shallow lake, deep lake, and subaerial exposure. Van Houten (1964) first proposed that
Milankovitch orbital forcing was responsible for the manifestation of these ~21 kyr cycles. Although root traces have been observed in VHCs by others, no detailed paleopedological analysis has been performed that examines the relationship between individual VHCs, orbital forcing, and paleosol development.
The Middle Passaic Formation of Late Triassic age is continuously exposed for over 30 meters along a railroad cut that follows Manatawny Creek near Pottstown, PA.
Six VHCs were identified at this location and the upper most three were selected for detailed study due to their strong development. Three Van Houten Groups (VHGs), consisting of VHC Division 3, Division 1, and Division 2 respectively, were formed in order to group paleosol profiles (Division 3) with stratigraphically adjacent lacustrine units (Divisions 1 and 2) since the lakes directly affect the paleosurface through inundation and erosion.
Petrographic analysis suggests that soils in this section only developed to the degree of Entisols or Protosols. Voids are lined with chalcedony and cored with calcite indicating diagenetic alteration. Molecular weathering ratio calculations proved unreliable due to diagenetic alteration of the strata. Magnetic susceptibility was measured on two intervals of the section, but is not well-suited to fractured, massive rock due to signal attenuation.
ii
Paleosol development is greater in instances where the overlying lake is poorly developed. Paleosols that are associated with a shallow lake or no lake likely have more time to develop than paleosols associated with deep lakes as the precipitation filling the lake would saturate the soil, hindering pedogenesis. The VHCs’ ~21 kyr interval forces time to be the limiting factor for pedogenesis in this section, ending in either sedimentation or inundation. However, time is also tied to climate as it modulates from relatively moist to relatively drier within a VHC. Orbital forcing is the ultimate controlling factor in soil formation since time, climate, insolation, and precipitation are all interrelated and influenced by it. Relief is independent of orbital forcing and a possible control on soil formation within the Basin. Soils that formed distal from the bounding fault may not have been subject to inundation due to their higher elevation.
Further research is needed to establish paleocatenary relationships of soil within the
Newark Basin.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
There are a lot of thanks to give regarding this project. Some people may require their own page, but I’ll try to paraphrase.
Thanks to the Colebrookedale Railroad, especially Beanie, for allowing us on their land.
I would like to thank all the professors for pushing me to make observations, not interpretations. DT, thank you for showing me the wonderful world of paleopedology and getting me started with fieldwork… and this project. It was puns of fun being your advisee. May the peanut butter joke forever live in infamy. G, when you weren’t making fun of New Jersey I suppose you may have taught me a thing or two about isotopes.
Your straightforward advice was always worth the “Well, no…” that surely followed whatever question I had. But I got there! Allison… kitty! Also thank you for providing me background information for this project and helping me (and the rest of us) teach fossils to the evolutions kids. And sarcasm is cool or whatever.
To my fellow graduate students: I literally could not have done this without you.
Andrew, Joe, and Justin, you were all there from day one, dealing with herp, derp, kee, and other things I say that make no sense. Good on you guys, good on you. Thanks to
Logan, your curiosity is surpassed by no one else I know. Keep on Logan-ing! Thanks to the chemistry kids: especially Mongo and Kate – always making sure I’m not hearing colors. Thanks to Nick for being a dog. Here is where I would thank Oest. Thank you
Jesse for making this awkward and thanks to Stevie Pee and Dr. Myer for all the XRD help. Bill, thank you for being my ped-head mentor over these past two years. You’ve helped me with my thesis more than these three sentences could possibly cover.
Prrrrrrrttttttttt...
iv
I must give an extra special thanks to Shelah for making sure everything went as smooth as CST administrative malarkey would allow, and for always keeping the coffee pot full.
Also thanks to Jim and Donald for keeping the department together.
Thanks to the undergraduates that helped me with this project, either directly or indirectly. Danni, thanks for making thin sections like a boss. Leslee, tank you for keeping me from freaking out, and helping out when you could. Supreme thanks to Matt
Enos for helping me with my field work, even when it was on weekends or got boring.
Last, but not least, I want to thank my family for understanding/putting up with my decision to further my education and for their support.
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...……………………………………………………….. iv LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………... viii LIST OF TABLES …………....…………………………………………………… x
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………….. 1
2. BACKGROUND ……………………………………………………………… 8 2.1 Field Site ………………………………………………………………. 8 2.2 Background Geology ………………………………………………….. 8 2.3 Previous Work ………………………………………………………… 14 2.3.1 Newark Basin ……………………………………………….. 14 2.3.2 Paleosols …………………………………………………………….. 19
3. METHODS ……………………………………………………………………. 22 3.1 Field Work ……………………………………………………………. 22 3.1.1 Paleopedological Analysis ………………………………….. 22 3.1.2 Magnetic Susceptibility …………………………………….. 23 3.2 Laboratory Analysis …………………………………………………... 23 3.2.1 Depth Ranks ………………………………………………… 23 3.2.2 Soil Micromorphology ……………………………………… 23 3.2.3 Clay Mineralogy …………………………………………….. 24 3.2.4 X-Ray Fluorescence ………………………………………… 24
4. RESULTS ……………………………………………………………………... 26 4.1 Lower Van Houten Group …………………………………………….. 26 4.2 Middle Van Houten Group ……………………………………………. 31 4.3 Upper Van Houten Group …………………………………………….. 34 4.4 Clay Mineralogy ………………………………………………………. 35 4.5 Molecular Weathering Ratios …………………………………………. 38
5. DISCUSSION …………………………………………………………………. 47 5.1 Agents of Soil Formation ……………………………………………... 47 5.1.1 Climate ……………………………………………………… 47 5.1.2 Organisms …………………………………………………… 48 5.1.3 Parent Material ……………………………………………… 50 5.1.4 Relief ………………………………………………………... 51 5.1.5 Time …………………………………………………………. 53
vi
5.2 Molecular Weathering Ratios …………………………………………. 54 5.3 Magnetic Susceptibility ……………………………………………….. 54 5.4 Diagenesis ……………………………………………………………... 55 5.5 Lake Facies and Marl Units ……………………………………………. 57 5.6 Orbital Forcing ………………………………………………………... 61 5.7 Modern-Day Comparisons ……………………………………………. 64 5.8 Implications …………………………………………………………… 65
6. CONCLUSIONS ……………………………………………………………… 67
REFERENCES CITED ……………………………………………………...... 69
APPENDICES Appendix A. X-Ray Fluorescence Instrument Error Based On Bhvo Analyses …………………………………………………………………... 76 Appendix B. Composition Of Samples From Paleosols And Lacustrine Sediments In Weight Percent Of Oxides And Minor Elements (ppm)……. 77 Appendix C Magnetic Susceptibility Data ………………………………… 79
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Fig. 1 – Geologic map of the Newark Basin……………………………………….. 2
Fig. 2 – Comparison of Triassic and modern day rift basins in Eastern Africa……. 3
Fig. 3 – The Van Houten Cycle model……………………………………………... 5
Fig. 4 – Exposures of various Triassic facies in the Newark Basin………………... 6
Fig. 5 – Aerial view of Pottstown, PA……………………………………………… 9
Fig. 6 – The Newark Basin as it was in the Late Triassic and today……………….. 11
Fig. 7 – Drill core data from the Newark Basin Coring Project……………………. 12
Fig. 8 – Cartoon representation of the three basic Milankovitch cycles…………… 17
Fig. 9 – Graphical representation of the hierarchy of sedimentary cycles…………. 18
Fig. 10 – Cross section of the Newark Basin Coring Project………………………. 20
Fig. 11 – Measured section of the exposure at Pottstown, PA…………………….. 27
Fig. 12 – Van Houten Cycle-scale measured section of the exposure at Pottstown.. 28
Fig. 13 – Photomicrographs of Unit 16…………………………………………….. 32
Fig. 14 – Photomicrographs of Unit 17…………………………………………….. 33
Fig. 15 – Photograph of Unit 19 and photomicrograph of clay fabric…………… 36
Fig. 16 – Photomicrographs of features within Unit 19……………………………. 37
Fig. 17 – Photomicrographs of Unit 20 and polished slabs from Units 29 and 30… 39
Fig. 18 – Photographs of various units within the middle Van Houten Cycle……... 40
Fig. 19 –.Photographs and photomicrographs of Unit 28………………………….. 41
Fig. 20 – Photomicrographs of Unit 30…………………………………………….. 42
Fig. 21 – X-Ray diffractogram of profiles………………………………………….. 43
viii
Fig. 22 – Molecular weathering ratios of each of the selected paleosols…………... 44
Fig. 23 – Bioturbation features within the study section…………………………… 49
Fig. 24 – Schematic drawings of the various basin types…………………………... 52
Fig. 25 – Photomicrographs of Unit 21…………………………………………….. 60
Fig. 26 – Photomicrographs of Unit 30…………………………………………….. 62
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1 – Depth Ranks …………………………………………………………… 23
Table 2 – Description of Units …………………………………………………… 30
Table 3 – Molecular Weathering Ratios …………………………………………. 45
x
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Divergent tectonics during the Late Triassic led to the formation of a series of rift basins stretching hundreds of kilometers along the East Coast of North America and the
West Coast of Africa (Smoot, 1991; Schlische, 1993; Olsen and Kent, 1996; El-Tabakh and Schreiber, 1998; El-Tabakh et al., 1997). The Proto-Appalachian Mountains shed much of their sediment into these basins and into the Atlantic Basin over tens of millions of years (Smoot and Olsen, 1988; Smoot, 1991), creating a sequence of strata that provides one of the longest, and most detailed records of continental climate change in the world (Arguden and Rodolfo, 1986; Olsen et al., 1996). At approximately 7,000 meters in thickness, the Newark Basin is the thickest of the exposed Triassic half grabens and is consequently the most studied of all the Early Mesozoic basins (Fig. 1; Arguden and Rodolfo, 1986; Schlische, 1992, 1993; Olsen et al., 1996). Modern analogues for these depositional environments can be seen in the East African Rift Valleys as they are of similar size and shape (Fig. 2; Olsen, 1986a; Smoot and Olsen, 1988; Schlische, 1993;
Whiteside et al., 2011; Harris et al., 2013).
McLaughlin (1933) was the first to document the cyclic nature of lacustrine sediments in the Newark Basin, and Van Houten (1964) was the first to hypothesize that cyclic lacustrine and mudstone deposition in the strata of the Hartford Rift Basin, CT, which is a northern analogue to the Newark Basin, was due to orbital forcing. These cycles were recognized in the Newark Basin several decades later by Olsen (1985), who termed them “Van Houten Cycles” (VHCs, Figs. 3, 4a). Olsen (1986a) quantified these cycles using Fourier analysis, providing further evidence that VHCs are the physical
1
Figure , New City York Fault (R). Boxed shown area in oximate location Pottstown, of dot) PA (green
. Note the Jacksonwald syncline (J) theand Ramapo (1996).
et al. et
– Geologic map the Newarkof Basin indicating appr Modified from Olsen
. Figure 1 indicated (NYC) by yellow dot 5
2
Figure 2 - Comparison of Triassic and modern day rift basins. Seismic reflections were used to define strata most likely to be preserved. Insert shows map of East African Rift lakes Turkana (Tu), Albert (A), Victoria (V), Tanganyika (T), and Malawi (M). From Whiteside et al. (2011).
3 manifestation of the ~21 kyr cycle of Milutin Milankovitch’s theory of astronomically induced climate change as Van Houten (1964) proposed (Schlische, 1992). These cycles vary in their degree of development throughout the basin over geologic time (Olsen and
Kent, 1996). Although these cycles have been studied extensively throughout the
Newark and Hartford Basins for over 80 years (McLaughlin, 1933; Van Houten, 1964;
Olsen, 1985, 1986a, 1986b, Smoot, 1991; Wolela and Gierlowski-Kordesch, 2007;
Gierlowski-Kordesch, 1998), paleosols have remained virtually unstudied or ignored
(Smoot and Olsen, 1988; contra Schaller et al., 2011, 2012).
Paleosols of the Newark Basin represent an as yet untapped source of paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental data. Soils need subaerial exposure, sufficient moisture and time to differentiate the substrate in order to form distinct horizons
(Birkeland, 1999). Paleosol profiles with distinct root traces are observed stratigraphically below deep lacustrine beds at this exposure. The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the relative degree of ancient soil formation is greater in well- expressed VHCs (i.e. having distinct shallow and deep lake divisions) within the Middle
Passaic Formation of the Newark Supergroup. If this hypothesis is true, then well- developed paleosols will be found associated with deep lake beds and poorly developed paleosols will be associated with shallow lake beds or no lake, suggesting that climate controls the degree of pedogenesis. If this hypothesis is not true, then time, as a function of orbital forcing, should be the limiting factor in soil formation.
4
subaerial t a tsingle a Van Houten -stand, division and lake 3 records level fall and in the Newark Basin. Divisionsrepresen 1 through 3 n lake2 records high . - Typological - classification level lake of cycles 3
Figure Cycle. Division 1 records divisiolevel rise, lake (Fromexposure Olsen and Kent, 1996)
5
6
Figure 4 – Exposures of various Triassic facies in the Newark Basin. Cyan arrows indicate up direction. (A) View of a Van Houten Cycle at Pottstown, PA . Divisions are marked in yellow. ( B) Fanglomerate proximal to the bounding fault of the Newark Basin near Reading, PA. ( C) Cross bedding in a channel sandstone, Stockton Formation, at Phoenixville, PA. Scale in cm and inches. ( D) Mudstone at Pottstown, PA (between yellow lines). Note the massive portion (m) closer to the top of the unit. Red scale bar is approximately 25 cm. ( E) Mudstone at Pottstown, PA (yellow line and above). Notice the more massive section (m) surrounded by more fractured material above and below (f). Red scale bar is approximately 50 cm. ( F) Algal laminations at Pottstown, PA, just above a massive layer. Pencil for scale.
7
CHAPTER 2
BACKGROUND
2.1 Field Site
This site is located close to the middle of the basin with the bounding fault to the northwest and basin hinge to the southeast (Fig. 1). Due to the mechanics of half graben development, the depositional environments change from fluvial (such as in Phoenixville,
PA, Fig. 4c), to lacustrine, to predominately subaerially exposed. The study site is located along an abandoned railroad cut in Pottstown, Pennsylvania (Fig. 5), just north of
Manatawny Park, and trends for almost 400 m along Manatawny Creek (starting at
40.262368, -75.661383). Strata are gently dipping (~15º) to the northwest and consist of four lithologies: mudstone, sandstone, marlstone and infrequent carbonates. Mudstones are massive, usually thicker than 4 meters, and contain occasional ‘pencil’ fractures that trend N54W. Sandstones consist of fine sand, are massive, and occur approximately every 4-7 meters in the lower part of the exposure. The marlstones are massive, composed of a high percentage of carbonate, and occur stratigraphically above mudstones. Relatively thin (~1 m) layers with fine (0.5-3 mm) laminations and darker hue are largely composed of carbonate (Olsen, 1986a, 1990, 1998).
2.2 Background Geology
The Newark Basin is part of a system of half-grabens, extending from
Newfoundland to North Carolina (Fig. 6), which resulted from the reactivation of
Precambrian and Paleozoic thrust faults as normal faults (Smoot and Olsen, 1988, 1994;
Schlische, 1992; Gierlowski-Kordesch, 1998). These basins represent a failed rift system which began in the Early Triassic with the opening of the Atlantic Ocean Basin. The
8
arth, Julyarth, 2013. . Study site oval.indicated by From red Google E Figure 1 – Aerial view – Aerial of Pottstown, PA from
Figure 5 9
Newark Basin is bound to the northwest by the Ramapo Fault. To the southeast, it is bordered by Cretaceous strata, except in Pennsylvania where it is bordered by Paleozoic rocks (Smoot, 1991; Schlische, 1992, 1993; Olsen et al., 1996). Not only is the Newark
Basin the largest of the basins, it is also the deepest, at over 7,000 meters of sediment in some places (Arguden and Rodolfo, 1986; Smoot, 1991; Schlische, 1993; Whiteside et al., 2011), with some estimates as high as 10,000 meters (Arguden and Rodolfo, 1986).
The Triassic Newark Basin is comprised of the Stockton, Lockatong, and Passaic
Formations, which formed during different stages of basin evolution (Figs. 4a, b, c and 7;
Arguden and Rodolfo, 1986; Olsen, 1986b; Schlische and Olsen, 1990; Olsen et al.,
1996; Olsen and Kent, 1996; Schlische, 1993). The Stockton Formation is composed of conglomerates and alluvial fans which are arkosic in composition with occasional, thin mudstones (Arguden and Rodolfo, 1986; Smoot and Olsen, 1994; Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004). The Lockatong Formation is composed of predominantly layers of black, gray, bluish-purple, and green shale between 3 and 7 meters thick. The Passaic
Formation consists mostly of red mudstone with distinct, laterally continuous dark shale beds of various thickness and fabric (Smoot and Olsen, 1988, 1994). The Stockton
Formation records fluvial deposition resulting in excess sedimentation relative to the
Basin’s capacity while the Lockatong Formation records a period of deep, perennial lakes, representing a sediment-starved system (Schlische, 1993; El-Tabakh et al., 1997).
The Passaic Formation is the thickest unit in the Newark Basin, thicker than the Stockton and Lockatong Formations combined, and represents a period of increased accommodation space relative to sediment input with shallow (relative to the Lockatong
Formation), playa lakes (Schlische, 1993; Olsen and Kent, 1996; Olsen et al., 1996;
10
Figure 6 – The Newark Basin as it was in the Late Triassic, and today. From Olsen and Kent (1996).
11
Figure 7 – Drill core data from the Newark Basin Coring Project. Modified from Olsen et al. (1996). Arrow shows approximate stratigraphic position of study site.
12
Gierlowski-Kordesch, 1998; Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004). Some of these formations have temporal analogues in other basins. For example, the New Haven
Arkose in the Hartford Basin is the temporal equivalent to the Passaic Formation
(Gierlowski-Kordesch, 1998; Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004).
The Lockatong and Passaic Formations record the best evidence of ~21 kyr periods (Van Houten Cycles) of time as stratigraphically varying facies (Van Houten,
1962, 1964; Olsen, 1986a; Olsen et al., 1989). These cycles represent the precession of the equinoxes (wobble) as described by Milankovitch theory and have been observed in the rock record for over 80 years (Fig. 8a, McLaughlin, 1933; Van Houten, 1962, 1964;
Olsen, 1986a; Olsen and Kent, 1996; Olsen et al., 1996). The two other orbital cycles include obliquity (angle between the equatorial and ecliptic planes, Fig. 8b), ranging from
22.1° to 24.5°, at ~41 kyr intervals, and eccentricity (roundness of Earth’s orbit), ranging from near 0 to 0.06, at ~100 kyr intervals (Fig. 8c, Hayes et al., 1976). Higher order stratigraphic cycles have been identified in Newark Basin strata and include the short modulating cycle (109 kyr, Fig. 8c), McLaughlin Cycle (405 kyr), and the long modulating cycle (1.75 my, Olsen et al., 1996, 2010; Olsen and Kent, 1999, Fig. 9).
Perturbations in Earth’s orbit affect the time-averaged amount of insolation
(amount of net solar input) received by Earth’s surface which, in turn, affects the rate of evaporation and precipitation (Hayes et al., 1976; Olsen et al., 1989). The high order orbital cycles (i.e. obliquity, eccentricity, Fig. 8) interfere with the short-term precessional cycle by enhancing or diminishing its effect on insolation, thus resulting in the manifestations of stratigraphic cycles (short modulating, McLaughlin, and long modulating cycles, Fig. 9). The balance of precipitation vs. evaporation (input vs. output)
13 is one of the determining factors on lateral facies changes and, therefore, lake formation
(Olsen, 1986a; Olsen et al., 1989). Other factors controlling lake formation/depth (to be discussed later) include subsidence rate, orographics, accommodation space, proximity to bounding fault (location in basin), and inter-basinal tectonics (Olsen, 1986a; Schlische,
1992, 1993).
2.3 Previous Work
2.3.1 Newark Basin
From late 1990 to early 1993 Olsen and Kent headed the Newark Basin Coring
Project (NBCP). The goal of this project was to recover the entirety of the Triassic section from the basin. Drilling one deep core was deemed too risky due to the presence of faults at depth. However, the five northeast-dipping fault blocks in the Newark Basin provide significant offset and allowed the drilling of several cores over a great horizontal distance. To ensure stratigraphic correlation, each core overlaps adjacent cores by an average of 25 percent. Through the NBCP (Fig. 10) Olsen and Kent (1996) showed that
VHCs have a periodicity of ~21 kyr. Various researchers have interpreted these cycles as a result of Milankovitch-forced climate change (Van Houten, 1964; Olsen, 1986a, 1986b;
Smoot and Olsen, 1988; Olsen and Kent, 1996). Generally, each of these packages consists of a shallow lacustrine unit, a deep lacustrine unit, and a terrestrial unit (Smoot and Olsen, 1994; Olsen and Kent, 1996). The shallow lacustrine unit (Fig. 3, division 1) has been interpreted as a relatively moist climate and the deeper lacustrine unit (Fig. 3, division 2) has been interpreted as lake highstand and the peak of each VHC. The upper terrestrial unit (Fig. 3, division 3) has been interpreted as relatively drier conditions, possibly resulting in subaerial exposure (Olsen, 1986a).
14
Lacustrine carbonate is formed under specific climatic and sedimentological conditions, ranging from tropical to glacial, with little to no siliciclastic influence
(Prothero and Schwab, 2004; Gierlowski-Kordesch, 2010). Carbonate formation is common in two distinct environments: tropical humid (e.g. Bahamas) and tropical arid
(e.g. Persian Gulf). Carbonate formation in different climatic conditions results in differing morphologies and mineralogies (Alsharhan and Kendall, 2003). Arid climate carbonates will have evaporite minerals such as gypsum, anhydrite, dolomite, and halite associated with them, or as layers stratigraphically adjacent to them (Butler, 1969; El-
Tabakh et al., 1997; El-Tabakh and Schreiber, 1998). Humid climate carbonates lack evaporite minerals and may exhibit epikarst (Klimchouk, 2004). Lacustrine carbonates can be found in most lakes in varying amounts today (Della Porta and Barilaro, 2011;
Harris et al., 2013), and in the geologic record (Gierlowski-Kordesch and Buchheim,
2003; Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004; Gierlowski-Kordesch, 2010). Lakes vary greatly in origin, depth, nature of and amount of sediment input, nature and amount of water input, organisms, salinity, and climate (Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004;
Gierlowski-Kordesch, 2010; Harris et al., 2013), and can form as the result of many different geologic processes including glaciations, mass wasting, fluvial meandering, tectonics, and volcanic activity (Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004). However, lakes formed as the result of tectonic forces (e.g. strike-slip, rift, foreland basins) are the most well-preserved in the geologic record (Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004).
Generally, lakes are classified into three categories: under-filled, balance-filled, and over-filled (Gierlowski-Kordesch, 1998; Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004;
Harris et al., 2013). Under-filled lakes are found in basins that have closed drainage
15
(endorheic), show a variety of contrasting lithologies, including siliciclastic, carbonate, and evaporite minerals, and tend to be chemically stratified (meromictic). Fluctuations in climate greatly affect these lakes (Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004). Balance-filled lakes alternate between closed and open hydrologies and tend to accumulate interbedded siliciclastic and carbonate sediments. Over-filled lakes (exorheric) have open hydrology, lower salinity, and stable shorelines (Harris et al., 2013). Climate fluctuations have little to no effect on these lakes (Gierlowski-Kordesch, 2010; Harris et al., 2013). Salinity will be higher in under-filled lakes and lowest in over-filled lakes because closed hydrology does not allow for dissolved salts to exit the basin, so they accumulate from crystallization due to evaporation (Gierlowski-Kordesch and Park, 2004). Lakes that formed in the Newark Basin varied among these three types throughout the basin’s history, starting over-filled and becoming increasingly under-filled as the basin evolved through the Late Triassic (Olsen et al., 1989; Schlische, 1992; Olsen, 1998).
While the sediments of the Newark Basin are very well studied, very little has been done with the paleosols that developed during periods of low sedimentation at the top of individual VHCs. Heffren (2008) studied facies changes in three separate VHCs, but made no mention of pedogenic features. Van Houten (1962), Olsen (1986a), and
Olsen and Kent (1996) noted the presence of root traces in mudstones, but did not expand on their observations. Schaller et al. (2011, 2012) analyzed pedogenic carbonate nodule
δ13 C data from the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) event in an attempt to correlate the splitting of Pangaea with the End-Triassic extinction. Smoot and Olsen
(1988) observed pedogenic features such as clay coatings, pedogenic slickensides, root structures, and carbonate nodules in the Newark Basin. However, the degree and nature
16
ssion, or wobble, of l with the Sun. inY-axis nts oval-shaped more orbit. ovitch over cycles 1 million (a) Axial years. prece e that axise Earth’s is tilted to relative orthogona orbit. represents Zero circular orbit, 8.0 represe – Cartoon representation basic the three of Milank 8
Figure the Earth. Unknownthe Earth. y-axis. Obliquity, (b) angl or degrees. Eccentricity,degrees. (c) roundness or Earth’s of Modified from Yu al. et (2008).
17
les found in the Newark Basin ight of each column.ight From each of Olsen al. et – Graphical representation the hierarchyof cyc of 9
with durations interpreted depth and to ranks the r (2010). Figure
18 of soil development was largely ignored in favor of a regional-scale, facies-oriented interpretation, and no detailed paleopedology was performed.
2.3.2 Paleosols
A paleosol is evidence of prolonged subaerial exposure that is preserved in the geologic record. Soils form as a result of biological, physical, and chemical modification of parent material over time. Soil formation requires an extended period (hundreds to tens of thousands of years) of landscape stability in order for these pedogenic processes to take place. Pedogenesis can create unconformities in the rock record from outcrop scale to regional scale (Kraus, 1999).
Paleosols occur in many depositional environments, including palustrine
(swamp), aeolian (wind-blown), and deltaic. However, the vast majority of paleosols have been described from paleo-alluvial environments (Pimental et al., 1996; Aslan and
Autin, 1998, 1999; Kraus, 1999; McCarthy and Plint, 2003; Terry, 2001; Atchley et al.,
2004, Hamer et al., 2007). These ancient soils record the paleoenvironmental conditions in which they were formed (Jenny, 1941; Retallack, 1994; Kraus, 1999; Terry, 2001).
The five main factors in soil formation include climate, organisms, relief, parent material, and time (CLORPT, Jenny, 1941). Some of these factors become more or less important as the soil develops. For instance, parent material is a greater contributing factor to soil characteristics in younger soils than older soils. Over time, leaching will remove the more mobile constituents (e.g. Ca, Mg, Na) and the soil will become relatively more enriched in silica and iron and aluminum oxides (Chesworth, 1973). The amount of relief present during pedogenesis greatly influences soil properties. High relief can cause severe erosion if the soil is on the shoulder of a slope while a soil at the base of the slope
19
k rs are Jurassic are rs . Figure 1 ject. ject. Green represents the Stockton Formation, dar c Formation,c represents red other and diabase, colo . From Olsen Kent (1996). and in as Key Figure 7 – Schematic drawing the Newarkof Basin Coring Pro 10
Figure blue the Lockatong Formation, light blue the Passai also See rocks.
20 would be thicker than normal due to the colluvial accumulation of sediment, giving the soil profile a pachic horizon (Birkeland, 1999).
Paleosols serve as a time-averaged record for these five factors in the form of soil chemistry, mineralogy, and morphology (Jenny, 1941; Kraus, 1999; Retallack, 2001).
However, these proxies can be altered by burial diagenesis (Retallack, 1991, 1994;
Wright, 1992; Pimentel et al., 1996; Kraus, 1999). Diagenesis can alter original oxidation state, color, mineralogy, and horizonation (Retallack, 1991). It is also possible for carbonate to accumulate in soils during diagenesis, making it difficult to distinguish from pedogenic carbonate (Pimentel et al., 1996). Pedogenic carbonate forms when the amount of rainfall that percolates through a soil is sufficient to leach calcium ions, but of insufficient amount to reach the water table. As the water is absorbed by plants or evaporates, the calcium carbonate is left behind. The depth to carbonate is a function of the average amount of rainfall. Jenny and Leonard (1935) found a positive relationship between mean annual precipitation (MAP) and carbonate depth in modern soils; the deeper the carbonate nodules, the higher the average rainfall. This method has been used with paleosols (Birkeland, 1999; Terry, 2001; Retallack, 2005), but reliability is lost once rainfall exceeds about 800 mm/yr (Retallack, 2005).
21
CHAPTER 3
METHODS
3.1 Field Work
3.1.1 Paleopedological Analysis
The exposure was carefully measured and units were delineated based on lithology and the nature of the contacts. Paleosol profiles were described, noting Munsell
(1975) color, reaction to HCl, grain size, soil structure, presence and size of root traces, and stratigraphic thickness. Measurements regarding soils are traditionally recorded as distance from the top of the profile. However, I measured strata in centimeters from the base of individual units and reference particular features as such. Approximately one hundred representative oriented and bulk samples were collected from various divisions of the three selected paleosols and their associated strata for further laboratory analysis.
3.1.2 Magnetic Susceptibility
Magnetic susceptibility (MS) was measured on the weathered surfaces of select
VHGs every 2 cm with a Bartington® MS2E in order to determine possible variation in sources of sediment or parent material (Blundell et al., 2009; Balsam et al., 2011). Rock units with elevated levels of magnetic minerals will react to a magnetic field more readily than rocks that are relatively less enriched (Singer et al., 1996). Magnetic susceptibility has been shown to serve as a proxy for plant roots and organic matter within paleosol profiles (Retallack et al., 2003).
22
3.2 Laboratory Analysis
3.2.1 Depth Ranks
Olsen (1986a) assigned depth ranks for the various facies within the Newark
Basin. However, I created my own system of site specific depth ranks in order to better reflect the facies changes observed at the Pottstown, PA site. My system is largely based on microscopic observations because features such as root traces, bioturbation, oncoliths, and relict bedding are more easily observed in thin section. Lithology contributes to the depth rank by separating largely subaerially exposed facies (mudstone) from subaqueous facies (carbonate-rich). Depth rank 0 represents rock units that are rarely or never subaqueous while depth rank 6 represents the deepest lake facies (Table 1).
Table 1 Description of Depth Ranks Depth Description Rank 0 Massive mudstone, root traces, bioturbation 1 Massive mudstone, bioturbation, algal mats, relict bedding 2 Massive to laminated mudstone, oncoliths possible, bioturbation 3 Laminated mudstone, various types of ripples common 4 Massive marlstone, calcic rip-up clasts common near top, rare oncoliths 5 Millimeter-scale laminations, carbonate interbedded with quartz-rich layers, brecciation 6 Millimeter-scale laminations, kerogen bearing carbonate, interbedded quartz-rich laminae
3.2.2 Soil Micromorphology
Oriented samples of each unit were cut and polished for micromorphological and mineralogical analysis. The samples were mounted to 5.08 cm x 7.62 cm glass slides and polished to a thickness of 30 µm (Brewer, 1964). Each sample was observed under a
Nikon E600 polarizing microscope to determine mineralogy, fabric, and the presence of
23 pedogenic features. Photomicrographs were taken using a Nikon DXM 1200F digital camera.
3.2.3 Clay Mineralogy
Clay minerals were identified using a Bruker D2 Phaser X-Ray Diffraction
(XRD) system at West Chester University. Analyses were done at 30 kV and 10 mA using CoKα radiation, and scanned from 4.451° to 34.996° 2 θ at a rate of 2.22° per minute.
Approximately 20 samples were prepared for analysis by powdering bulk samples using a mullite-chamber shatterbox. Each powder sample was then placed into plastic containers with deionized and distilled water and placed in a Hermle Labortechnik Z400 centrifuge for 12 minutes at 500 RPM to separate the clay fraction from the coarser sediment. The fluid from each container was decanted into a beaker and oriented using the Millipore® Filter Transfer Method prescribed by Moore and Reynolds (1997).
Samples estimated to have the highest chance of containing swelling clays (samples from paleosol profiles rather than lacustrine beds) were placed in a desiccator with ethylene glycol for at least 24 hours.
3.2.4 X-Ray Fluorescence
Bulk chemical composition was determined using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF).
Ten bulk samples were powdered to ≤180 µm (80 mesh) using a mullite-chamber shatterbox. The powder was placed into vials, and sent to Franklin & Marshall College for analysis using a PANalytical 2404 X-ray fluorescence vacuum spectrometer equipped with a 4kW rhodium (Rh) X-ray tube (Franklin and Marshall, 2013). Major element samples were prepared by fusing a glass disk made of 0.4000 ± 0.0001 g whole rock
24 powder and 3.6000 ± 0.0002 g lithium tetraborate in a platinum crucible (Franklin and
Marshall, 2013). Trace element samples were pressed into a homogenized pellet of
7.0000 ± 0.0004 g whole rock powder and 1.4000 ± 0.0002 g copolywax powder
(Franklin and Marshall, 2013). Compositions in weight percent were converted into moles by dividing the data (ppm or percent oxide) by the molar mass of the element or oxide prior to calculating molecular weathering ratios (Sheldon and Tabor, 2009).
Molecular weathering ratios are used as proxies for pedogenic processes by comparing the relative abundances of elements (Sheldon and Tabor, 2009). Several molecular weathering ratios are used to infer relative intensity of weathering or associate