Integrated Resource Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrated Resource Plan 2019 Integrated Resource Plan Adopted by Burbank City Council at its December 11, 2018 Meeting Table of Contents Chapter 1 6 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 Assumptions and Implications 7 1.3 Major Changes Since 2015 IRP 9 1.4 Proposed Policy Guidelines 9 1.5 Action Items 10 Chapter 2 11 2.1 Introduction 12 2.1.1 About the IRP 12 2.1.2 Key Policy Drivers 13 2.1.3 Major Challenges 13 2.1.4 IRP Overview 14 2.2 Starting with Customers 15 2.2.1 Public Input 15 2.2.2 Demand and Energy Forecast 16 2.3 Customer-Side Resources 17 2.3.1 Energy Efficiency 17 2.3.2 Demand Response 18 2.3.3 Electric Vehicles 20 2.3.4 Customer-Owned Generation 21 2.3.5 Results of Customer-Side Impacts 21 2.4 Supply-Side Resources: The SB350 Future 22 2.4.1 Retirement of IPP coal in 2025 23 2.4.2 IPP Coal Replacement Options 23 2.4.3 Results: Replacing IPP Coal 25 2.5 Supply-Side Resources: The SB100 Future 27 2.5.1 Retirement of IPP Coal in 2025 27 2.5.2 Same IPP Coal Replacement Options as in SB350 27 2.5.3 Results: Replacing IPP Coal 28 2.6 Over-Generation at High RPS Levels 30 2.7 STS Transmission Utilization 31 2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 32 Burbank Water and Power - 2019 Integrated Resource Plan Page | 2 2.9 Transmission 33 2.10 Distribution 33 2.11 Customer Rate Impacts 33 2.12 EIM Participation 34 2.13 Proposed Policy Guidelines 34 2.14 Action Items 35 2.12 Conclusion 35 Chapter 3 36 3.1 About BWP 37 3.2 Load 38 3.2.1 BWP is a Fully-Resourced Utility 40 3.2.2 Load Patterns 41 3.2.3 Annual Energy Requirements 41 3.2.4 The Duck Curve 43 3.2.5 Over-Generation 47 3.3 Generation 48 3.3.1 Baseload, Load-Following, Peaking and Intermittent Power Resources 49 3.3.2 Renewable Resources 52 3.3.3 Generation Diversity and Beneficial Impact on Rates 53 3.4 Transmission Resources 54 3.4.1 Bulk Transmission Reliability Issues 56 3.4.2 Transmission Planned Upgrades and Additions 56 3.5 Distribution 57 3.5.1 Distribution Reliability 59 3.5.2 Anticipating Customer DER Developments 61 3.5.3 Distribution Planned Upgrades and Additions 61 3.6 Grid Modernization 62 3.6.1 Grid Modernization Benefits 63 3.6.2 Grid Modernization Helps Promote Transportation Electrification 63 3.6.3 Grid Modernization Reduces Power Outages, Improves Power Quality 65 3.7 Energy Efficiency 65 3.7.1 Energy Efficiency Portfolio Results 67 3.7.2 Current Energy Efficiency Portfolio Strategy 68 3.7.3 Long-Term Impact of Efficiency Efforts 69 3.7.4 Ongoing Responsiveness to the Community 70 Burbank Water and Power - 2019 Integrated Resource Plan Page | 3 3.7.5 Other Energy Efficiency Program Descriptions 73 3.7.6 BWP’s Energy Efficiency Programs 73 3.7.7 Programs for Disadvantaged Communities 76 3.8 Customer Distributed Generation 77 3.8.1 Rooftop Solar 78 3.8.3 Customer Energy Storage 81 Chapter 4 82 4.1 Legislative and Regulatory Factors 83 4.1.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 83 4.1.2 Federal Legislation 84 4.1.3 Tax-Exempt Financing 84 4.1.4 California Legislation 84 4.1.4a Energy Efficiency Legislation 85 4.1.4b State Greenhouse Gas Reduction Legislation and Executive Orders 85 4.1.5 IRP Requirements Summaries and Checklist 93 4.1.6 Beyond 2020 93 4.2 Rate Design 94 4.2.1 The Ratemaking Process 94 4.2.2 Appropriate Price Signals 95 4.2.3 Current Electric Rates 96 4.2.4 Electric Rate Comparison 102 4.3 Balancing Authority Services 103 4.3.1 Western Electricity Coordinating Council 103 4.3.2 Balancing Authorities 105 4.3.3 BWP Within LADWP’s Balancing Authority 108 4.3.4 Balancing Authority Solution 108 4.4 Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA) 109 4.5 Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) 110 4.5.1 SCPPA Request for Proposals (RFP) for CAES Options 114 4.5.2 Wyoming Wind 115 Chapter 5 116 5.1 Public Education and Outreach 117 5.2 Major Issues Discussed 118 5.3 What BWP Heard from Customers 119 5.3.1 The Primary Issues 119 5.3.2 Open Question 130 Burbank Water and Power - 2019 Integrated Resource Plan Page | 4 5.3.3 Other Topics 131 Chapter 6 132 6.1 Customer Energy Use 133 6.1.1 Over-Generation 133 6.1.2 Strategies to Mitigate the Duck Curve 135 6.1.3 Transportation Electrification 136 6.1.4 Load-Shifting Opportunities 140 6.1.5 Load Management 140 6.2 Energy Storage 144 6.2.1 What is Energy Storage? 144 6.2.2 Storage Options for BWP 144 6.3 Generation Portfolio 146 6.3.1 Supply-Side Resources: The SB350 Future 146 6.3.2 Supply-Side Resources: The SB100 Future 152 6.4 Resource Adequacy 159 6.4.1 Installed Capacity 159 6.4.2 Flexible Capacity 159 6.5 STS Transmission Utilization 160 6.6 Over-Generation at High RPS Levels 162 6.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 163 6.8 Comparison of the IPP Replacement Options 164 6.9 Impact on BWP Customers’ Rates 165 Chapter 7 166 7.1 Policy Guidelines 167 7.2 Action Items 168 Chapter 8 - Appendices 169 Appendix 1. Generation 170 Appendix 2. BWP’s Transmission Rights 176 Appendix 3. Standardized Tables 181 Appendix 4. Checklist: Requirements for Publicly-Owned Utility IRP Reports 189 Chapter 9 - Exhibits 196 Exhibit A - BWP’s Fiscal Year 2016-17 Energy Efficiency Programs 197 Exhibit B - IRP Online and Town Hall Meetings Survey 198 Exhibit C - BWP Glossary of Terms 208 Exhibit D - BWP’s Historical Timeline 217 Burbank Water and Power - 2019 Integrated Resource Plan Page | 5 Chapter 1 Overview Burbank Water and Power - 2019 Integrated Resource Plan Page | 6 1.1 Introduction This is the 2019 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) of Burbank Water and Power (BWP). The IRP is a long-term planning document designed to provide policy guidance for BWP’s electric supply to its customers over the next twenty years, from 2019 through 2038. The IRP, like all long-term planning, is directional rather than determinative. In other words, the IRP helps Burbank see the broad contours of its energy future and the general direction Burbank should head to reach that future; it is not a roadmap for decision-making beyond the near-term. The utility industry is undergoing dramatic change and this IRP reflects it. Concerns for climate change, the growth of cost-effective renewable energy and energy storage, and the pending retirement of one of BWP’s primary legacy energy sources, a coal-fired power plant called Intermountain Power Project (IPP), are all elements in the mix. At the same time, the IRP is informed by public input: what are the perspectives of Burbank residents, businesses, and other stakeholders with respect to Burbank’s energy future? BWP had a robust interaction with the public for this IRP, focused on major issues impacting BWP’s provision of reliable, affordable, and sustainable electric service to Burbank. This Chapter provides a brief overview of the highlights of the IRP, major changes in BWP’s business since its last IRP in 2015, proposed policy direction, and actions to fulfill that policy direction. The remainder of this IRP goes into greater detail on BWP’s business, both today and through the lens of long-term planning. Finally, detail on BWP’s public outreach can be found in Chapter 5. 1.2 Assumptions and Implications As a long-term planning document, the IRP is necessarily based on significant assumptions about the future: this carries inherent uncertainty, especially with the utility industry undergoing dramatic change. This IRP must make significant assumptions about a variety of key aspects of BWP’s business over the next 20 years, from federal and state policy direction to the availability of cost-effective renewable energy generation and electric transmission resources to the growth of electric demand in Burbank. With respect to generation and transmission resources, the IRP assumes that the economies of scale available in joint procurement with Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) and others will remain. Also, for the purposes of this IRP, BWP forecasts little to no peak demand or energy growth over the next 20 years. This forecast is consistent with the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) forecast for the same period and reflects some (but not all) development under consideration in Burbank. Burbank Water and Power - 2019 Integrated Resource Plan Page | 7 The IRP is also based on Burbank’s and California’s energy policies. These include the “loading order”, whereby electricity demand is to be met first with energy efficiency and demand-side resources, then with renewable energy and then, to the extent that these are insufficient, with clean conventional electricity supply. These also include Senate Bill 350 (SB350) and Senate Bill 100 (SB100) which, among other things, mandate energy efficiency and renewable energy requirements for utilities like BWP. BWP, working with expert consultants, used those assumptions, public input, and legislative and policy framework to create illustrative views of Burbank’s energy future over the next 20 years. This complex analysis, referred to as “modeling”, yielded a number of major implications for Burbank’s energy future. These major implications are summarized here and discussed in greater detail in the body of the IRP.
Recommended publications
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • 5.0 Cumulative Impacts
    TransWest Express EIS Chapter 5.0 – Cumulative Impacts 5-1 5.0 Cumulative Impacts NEPA requires an assessment of potential cumulative impacts. Federal regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508) define cumulative impacts as: “…the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time.” The same resources evaluated for Project effects (Chapter 3.0) are evaluated for cumulative effects. The cumulative impact discussion assumes that all environmental mitigation measures discussed in Chapter 3.0 would be applied to the Project and that similar measures would be applied to other reasonably foreseeable transmission lines proposed on federal lands in the same alternative corridors. It also is assumed that these and any other projects on federal lands would comply with the applicable BLM Land Use Plans and Forest Service Forest Plans, as well as applicable federal, state, and local regulations and permit requirements. The structure and content of the cumulative impacts analysis in this EIS follows the guidance contained in the BLM NEPA handbook (BLM 2008) and the CEQ Guidance on Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National Policy Act (CEQ 1997). 5.1 Physical and Temporal Boundaries of Cumulative Impacts In general, physical boundaries for cumulative impacts analysis varied by resource and were identical to those analysis areas used in Chapter 3.0 to determine the context of Project impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Plan
    2017-2018 TRANSMISSION PLAN March 14, 2018 REVISED DRAFT Foreword to Revised Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan This revised draft transmission plan reflects a number of changes from the draft plan released on February 1, 2018. To assist our stakeholders following the transmission plan cycle, we have summarized a number of those changes, with particular emphasis on a number of projects where the recommendations have progressed since the release on February 1 and the subsequent stakeholder meeting on February 8: • The model estimating the impact of the transmission plan on the ISO’s High Voltage TAC has been updated and the results added to the model. • The Oakland Clean Energy Initiative project is recommended for approval • The Phasor Measurement Unit project has been added and is recommended for approval • The Bridgerville-Garberville #2 115 kV line project is recommended to remain on hold. • The Kearney-Caruthers 70 kV Line Reonductor project is recommended to proceed with the original scope. • The recommended revised scope for the Kern 115 kV Area Reinfoement has been updated as presented at the February 8 stakeholder meeting. • Section 2.10 addressing the need for phasor measurement units to be installed on all ISO balancing authority area interties has been added. • Several projects approved in the 2016-2017 transmission planning cycle have been added to Table 7.1-1: Status of Previously-approved Projects Costing Less than $50M, that had been omitted from the table in the Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan. • The in-service date for a number of previously approved projects have been updated. A number of clarifications and edits have also been added throughout the plan to address other stakeholder comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft 2014-2015 Transmission Plan This Revised Draft Transmission Plan Reflects a Number of Changes from the Draft Plan Released on February 2, 2015
    Forward to the Revised Draft 2014-2015 Transmission Plan This revised draft transmission plan reflects a number of changes from the draft plan released on February 2, 2015. To assist our stakeholders following the transmission plan cycle, we have summarized a number of those changes: The model estimating the impact of the transmission plan on the ISO’s High Voltage TAC has been updated and the results added to the model. The ISO has confirmed with Duke American Transmission Company that DATC’s request window submission for the San Luis Transmission Project was sent, but not received on the original request window submission timeline. It has subsequently been resent and received by the ISO. Accordingly, the plan has been revised to incorporate the review of the to the request window submission. A number of clarifications and edits have been added throughout the plan to address other stakeholder comments. 2014-2015 ISO Transmission Plan March 19, 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 The Transmission Planning Process ................................................................ 3 Collaborative Planning Efforts .......................................................................... 4 Advancing Preferred Resources ....................................................................... 6 Reliability Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Tenth Biennial Electric Transmission Final Assessment Report
    FINAL DRAFT Tenth Biennial Transmission Assessment 2018-2027 Staff Report Docket No. E-00000D-17-0001 December 31, 2018 Prepared by Arizona Corporation Commission Staff And ESTA International, LLC 2214 Rock Hill Road, Suite 180 Herndon, Virginia, 20170-4234 Decision No. 76975 [This page intentionally blank for formatting purposes] Biennial Transmission Assessment for 2018-2027 Docket No. E-00000D-17-0001 December 31, 2018 Decision No. 76975 Foreword The Arizona Corporation Commission (“ACC” or “Commission”) performs a biennial review of the ten-year transmission plans filed by parties who are responsible for transmission facilities in Arizona and issues a written decision regarding the adequacy of the existing and planned transmission facilities to reliably meet the present and future transmission system needs of Arizona.1 This report by the Staff of the Commission’s Utilities Division (“ACC Staff” or “Staff”) is the Tenth Biennial Transmission Assessment (“BTA” or “Tenth BTA”) and has been prepared in accordance with a contract agreement between ESTA International, LLC (“ESTA”) and the Commission. It is considered a public document. Use of the report by other parties shall be at their own risk. Neither ESTA nor the Commission accept any duty of care to such third parties. Arizona’s Tenth BTA is based upon the Ten-Year Plans filed with the Commission by parties in January 2018. It also incorporates information and comments provided by participants and attendees in the BTA workshops and report review process. ACC Staff and ESTA appreciate the contributions, cooperation, and support of industry participants throughout the Tenth BTA process. 1 Arizona Revised Statute §40-360.02 Biennial Transmission Assessment for 2018-2027 Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2010-0091-EA November 2014 Southern Nevada Intertie Project APPLICANT Great Basin Transmission, LLC GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086359 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Identifying Information ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.1. Title, EA Number, and Type of Project .............................................. 1-2 1.1.2. Location of Proposed Action ............................................................... 1-2 1.1.3. Name and Location of Preparing Office ............................................. 1-2 1.1.4. Identify the Case File Number ............................................................ 1-2 1.1.5. Applicant Name ................................................................................... 1-2 1.2. Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................. 1-2 1.2.1. Background ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2. BLM Purpose and Need .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EB-2011-0140 in the MATTER of Sections 70
    EB-2011-0140 IN THE MATTER OF sections 70 and 78 of the Ontario Energy Board Act 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15 (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF a Board-initiated proceeding to designate an electricity transmitter to undertake development work for a new electricity transmission line between Northeast and Northwest Ontario: the East-West Tie line. INTERROGATORIES OF RES CANADA TRANSMISSION LP to EWT L.P. January 30, 2013 12115001_5|TORDOCS EB-2011-0140 Interrogatories of RES Canada Transmission LP to EWT L.P. Filed: January 30, 2013 Page 2 of 24 Interrogatory #1 Project Schedules Reference: a. AltaLink: Part B, Section 7 b. EWT: Part B, Exhibit 7 c. CNPI: Part B, Section 7 d. Iccon/TPT: Volume 1, Section 7 e. UCT: Section B, Section 7 f. RES: Exhibit N Preamble: Each applicant has prepared development and construction cost estimates that are dependent, inter alia, upon underpinning project schedule assumptions. Some applicants have assumed aggressive project schedules. For example, both UCT and EWT assume that the leave to construct process – from application to decision – can be completed in less than one year. The generalized phase-by-phase project schedule of each applicant is shown in the table below. The questions below are intended to test the reasonableness of the scheduling assumption and the sensitivity of development and construction cost estimates to changes in the project schedule that underpins each such estimate. Table 1: Project Schedules Questions: a. What evidence can EWT offer that a nine month leave-to-construct phase – from application to decision – is reasonable and achievable? 12115001_5|TORDOCS EB-2011-0140 Interrogatories of RES Canada Transmission LP to EWT L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Public Power Authority
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED APRIL 29, 2016 NEW ISSUES – FULL BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Ratings: Standard & Poor’s: “AA-” Moody’s: “Aa2” (See “RATINGS” herein.) In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, under existing law, interest on the 2016 Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of the State of California and, assuming compliance with the tax covenants described herein, interest on the 2016 Bonds will be excludable from the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes and will not be treated as an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. $49,710,000* SoutHern California Public Power AutHority (a public entity organized under the laws of the State of California) $27,440,000* $22,270,000* Mead-Adelanto Project, Authority Interest (LADWP), Mead-Phoenix Project, Authority Interest (LADWP), Revenue Bonds, 2016 Series A Revenue Bonds, 2016 Series A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown on inside cover This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. It is not intended to be a summary of the security or terms of these issues. Investors are advised to read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision. Capitalized terms used on this cover page not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth herein. The Mead-Adelanto Project, Authority Interest (LADWP), Revenue Bonds, 2016 Series A (the “2016 Mead-Adelanto Bonds”) are being issued by Southern California Public Power Authority (the “Authority”) pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of May 1, 2016, from the Authority to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region's
    FINAL Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region’s Facilities Historic Context Statement Edited by Lisa M. Meyer September 2014 FINAL Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region’s Facilities Historic Context Edited by Lisa M. Meyer September 2014 DSW Region’s Facilities Historic Context Statement CONTENTS Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................. 1-1 Data Sources Consulted ......................................................................................................... 1-5 Current Document ................................................................................................................. 1-8 2. Statement of Context Part 1: DSW Region’s Transmission Power Systems………………………………………… ...................................................................................... 2-1 Temporal Context .................................................................................................................. 2-1 Geographic Context ............................................................................................................... 2-1 Historic Context ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2013-0052-EA DOE/EA-1960
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2013-0052-EA DOE/EA-1960 June 10, 2013 Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Southern Nevada District Office Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 702-515-5000 Office 702-515-5010 Fax Environmental Assessment for the Townsite Solar Project DOE/EA-1960 DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2013-0052 EA N-91290 Prepared For U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Southern Nevada District Office Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV Prepared by: 8250 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89117 June 10, 2013 Townsite Solar Project Environmental Assessment Contents Contents 1 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Relationship to Laws, Regulations, Policies, and Other Plans...................................................... 4 1.3 Supplemental Authorities .............................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Identifying Information ................................................................................................................. 6 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Mohave County Wind Farm Project
    BP Wind Energy North America Inc. Mohave County Wind Farm Project Plan of Development Submitted to BLM Kingman Field Office April 2013 Revision Mohave County Wind Farm Project Plan of Development Signature Page I certify that to the best of my knowledge, this document is accurate and fulfills the requirements for the Right of Way Grant process. This Plan of Development (POD) for the Mohave County Wind Farm Project site accompanies the Final EIS. Name Date ii Mohave County Wind Farm Project Plan of Development TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Proposed Schedule ............................................................................................ 1-4 1.2 Proponent’s Purpose and Need for the Project ................................................................ 1-5 1.3 General Facility Description, Design, and Operation ...................................................... 1-5 1.3.1 Project Location, Land Ownership, and Jurisdiction ........................................ 1-5 1.3.2 Legal Land Description of Facility ................................................................... 1-5 1.3.3 Total Acreage .................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.4 Number and Size of Wind Turbines .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
    LOCAL KNOWLEDGE | GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE 877 GRS CRE1 +1 213 908 2173 www.grs-global.com Los Angeles New York Due Diligence Chicago PHASE I San Francisco Project Management San Diego Financial Advisory ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Atlanta Strategic Asset Solutions PROPERTY REFERENCE: Dallas 6690 GRAND MONTECITO PARKWAY, LAS VEGAS, NV Frankfurt London Tokyo PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Prepared for: FDIC as Receiver for Southwest USA Bank FIN 10267 40 Pacifica, Fifth Floor Irvine, CA Property Identification Asset# 10267F012 (Southwest USA Bank FIN 10267) 6690 Grand Montecito Parkway Las Vegas, NV Prepared by: Global Realty Services Group 325 Center Street, Laguna Beach, California 92651 877 GRS CRE1 | +1 213 908 2173 | www.grs-global.com Report Date: December 29, 2010 GRS Project #: 10-08517.3 RESTRICTED USE AND RELIANCE THE USE OF AND RELIANCE UPON THIS REPORT ARE STRICTLY LIMITED AS SET FORTH HEREIN TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview.............................................................................................................................................. 1 Data Gaps................................................................................................................................................................2 Limiting Conditions................................................................................................................................................. 2 Findings and Opinions.............................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]