DOCSLIB.ORG

Selling the American People: Data, Technology, and the Calculated Transformation of Advertising

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Selling the American People: Data, Technology, and the Calculated Transformation of Advertising University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2018 Selling The American People: Data, Technology, And The Calculated Transformation Of Advertising Lee Mcguigan University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Mcguigan, Lee, "Selling The American People: Data, Technology, And The Calculated Transformation Of Advertising" (2018). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3159. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3159 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3159 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Selling The American People: Data, Technology, And The Calculated Transformation Of Advertising Abstract This dissertation tells the history of a future imagined by advertisers as they interpreted and constructed the affordances of digital information technologies. It looks at how related efforts to predict and influence consumer habits and to package and sell audience attention helped orchestrate the marriage of behavioral science and big-data analytics that defines digital marketing today. My research shows how advertising and commercial media industries rebuilt their information infrastructures around electronic data processing, networked computing, and elaborate forms of quantitative analysis, beginning in the 1950s. Advertisers, agencies, and media companies accommodated their activities to increasingly calculated ways of thinking about consumers and audiences, and to more statistical and computational forms of judgement. Responding to existing priorities and challenges, and to perceived opportunities to move closer to underlying ambitions, a variety of actors envisioned the future of marketing and media through a set of possibilities that became central to the commercialization of digital communications. People involved in the television business today use the term “advanced advertising” to describe a set of abilities at the heart of internet and mobile marketing: programmability (automation), addressability (personalization), shoppability (interactive commerce), and accountability (measurement and analytics). In contrast to the perception that these are unique elements of a “new” digital media environment that emerged in the mid-1990s, I find that these themes appear conspicuously in designs for using and shaping information technologies over the course of the past six decades. I use these potential abilities as entry points for analyzing a broader shift in advertising and commercial media that began well before the popular arrival of the internet. Across the second half of the twentieth century, the advertising industry, a major cultural and economic institution, was reconstructed around the goal of expanding its abilities to account for and calculate more of social and personal life. This transformation sits at an intersection where the processing of data, the processing of commerce, and the processing of culture collide. Degree Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Graduate Group Communication First Advisor Joseph Turow Keywords Advertising, Calculation, History, Information, Political economy, Technology Subject Categories Communication This dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3159 SELLING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: DATA, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE CALCULATED TRANSFORMATION OF ADVERTISING Lee McGuigan A DISSERTATION in Communication Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Supervisor of Dissertation ________________________ Joseph Turow, Robert Lewis Shayon Professor of Communication Graduate Group Chairperson ________________________ Guobin Yang, Grace Lee Boggs Professor of Communication and Sociology Dissertation Committee Oscar H. Gandy, Jr., Professor Emeritus of Communication Carolyn Marvin, Frances Yates Emeritus Professor of Communication Victor Pickard, Associate Professor of Communication SELLING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: DATA, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE CALCULATED TRANSFORMATION OF ADVERTISING COPYRIGHT 2018 Lee McGuigan This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ iii For my family and friends iv ACKNOWLEDGMENT None of this would have been possible without the support of my family, especially my parents, Diane and John, and my wife, Emily. Along with my brother, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and in-laws, these people have enabled and motivated everything I do. I want to thank the people who took time to talk with me and help me understand the things I write about in this work. Thanks, also, to the organizations that let me attend events at discounted rates, or in a few cases, for free. Thanks to Brian Kenny and the Cable Center’s Barco Library for allowing me to visit and make use of archival materials—an enormously educational experience. And thanks to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for supporting my research. Importantly, I could not have even begun on this work without the extraordinary librarianship of Sharon Black and Min Zhong. I have been fortunate to benefit from the mentorship and collegiality of many brilliant people, both at Penn and, previously, at the University of Western Ontario. My experiences at UWO set me on a path that took me to places I never would have imagined. I am grateful most of all to Edward Comor, Robert Babe, Daniel Robinson, Alison Hearn, Keir Keightley, James Compton, Sandra Smeltzer, Nick Dyer- Witheford, Michael Daubs, Kyle Asquith, Henry Svec, Channelle Martin, Andrea Benoit, and Liam Young. My frequent collaborator, Vincent Manzerolle, deserves special commendation. Like all my other work, most of what follows is an artful repackaging of Vince’s ideas. In supervising me toward completion of this dissertation, Joseph Turow performed masterfully at a job that must have been difficult, or at least often unpleasant. I was supported by an outstanding committee, with each member making major contributions to my development. Victor Pickard helped me find my footing in the program. Carolyn Marvin pushed me to be more careful in making and evaluating claims. And Oscar Gandy was extraordinarily generous in giving his time, attention, and guidance. Many others at the Annenberg School contributed meaningfully to my time here, including Litty Paxton, Monroe Price, Sharrona Pearl, Guobin Yang, Marwan Kraidy, Michael Delli Carpini, and Barbie Zelizer. Barbie’s activities brought me into contact with Robin Mansell and Dan Schiller, both of whom have impacted me in tremendously positive and lasting ways. I have also benefited—more than I deserve—from interactions v with more senior collaborators and mentors, including Graham Murdock, Janet Wasko, Eileen Meehan, and Anthony Nadler. Finally, it has been a privilege to work with the wonderful students and staff at ASC. I owe more than I could possibly say to more people than I can name here. For outstanding patience in enduring my friendship, I thank: Rosemary Clark-Parsons, Aaron Shapiro, Corrina Laughlin, Emily Hund, Ope Akanbi, Omar Al-Ghazzi, Kevin Gotkin, Anne Kaun, Sam Oliver, Christin Scholz, Nora Draper, Deb Lui, Elena Maris, and Sanjay Jolly. This is a painfully incomplete list of the many people whose Herculean efforts have made me appear useful. vi ABSTRACT SELLING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: DATA, TECHNOLOGY AND THE CALCULATED EVOLUTION OF ADVERTISING Lee McGuigan Joseph Turow This dissertation tells the history of a future imagined by advertisers as they interpreted and constructed the affordances of digital information technologies. It looks at how related efforts to predict and influence consumer habits and to package and sell audience attention helped orchestrate the marriage of behavioral science and big-data analytics that defines digital marketing today. My research shows how advertising and commercial media industries rebuilt their information infrastructures around electronic data processing, networked computing, and elaborate forms of quantitative analysis, beginning in the 1950s. Advertisers, agencies, and media companies accommodated their activities to increasingly calculated ways of thinking about consumers and audiences, and to more statistical and computational forms of judgement. Responding to existing priorities and challenges, and to perceived opportunities to move closer to underlying ambitions, a variety of actors envisioned the future of marketing and media through a set of possibilities that became central to the commercialization of digital communications. People involved in the television business today use the term “advanced advertising” to describe a set of abilities at the heart of internet and mobile marketing: programmability (automation), addressability (personalization), shoppability (interactive commerce), and accountability (measurement and analytics). In contrast to the perception that these are unique elements of a “new” digital media environment that emerged in the mid-1990s, I find that these themes appear conspicuously in designs for using and shaping information technologies over the course of the past six decades. I use these potential abilities as entry points for analyzing a broader shift in advertising and commercial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Point of Sale Newsletter
    September 2017 April 2019 POINT OF SALE Updates from Benesch’s Retail, Hospitality & Consumer Products Industry Group Media Transparency: An Update on the Status of the FBI/DOJ Investigation, Recovery Efforts and Best Practices Going Forward The number of issues and areas of inquiry resulting from the revelations set forth in the ANA/K2 Report continue to mount. As originally detailed in the Fall of last year, the FBI is actively investigating certain media buying agencies for alleged non-transparent practices and looking to the advertisers potentially defrauded to assist with its investigation. Just last week, AdAge published an article noting that the FBI has an “unredacted version” of the K2 report including names of all 41 previously unidentified sources. Moreover, certain agencies are affirmatively The evidence shows media trying to cover their tracks and/or to revise their existing contracts to either permit the questionable conduct going forward or to limit the audit rights of their advertiser clients. suppliers paying undisclosed Benesch attorneys are working closely with the forensic investigators at K2 Intelligence and auditors rebates to media buying at FirmDecisions to assist clients with investigating possible wrongdoing by their (current or former) agencies in amounts ranging media buying agencies. These efforts range from helping clients navigate the potential pitfalls involved from 1.67% to 20% of in cooperating with the active FBI investigation and ensuring that they fulfill their duties to shareholders, to securing recoveries from the agencies where appropriate. Given that non-transparent conduct can aggregate media spending. often amount to a substantial percentage of a company’s overall media spend, these claims can easily stretch in to the seven- and eight-figure range.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer
    McKinsey Consumer & Shopper Insights Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer McKinsey Insights China McKinsey Consumer & Shopper Insights March 2012 Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer Yuval Atsmon Max Magni Lihua Li Wenkan Liao The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of their colleagues: Molly Liu, Cherie Zhang, Barry Liu, Rachel Zheng, Justin Peng, William Cheng, Glenn Leibowitz, Joanne Mason. 5 Contents Introduction 6 1. China at a turning point 8 2. Getting the basics right: changing demographics 12 Mainstream consumers driving income growth 13 Aging population 17 Postponed life stages 18 Increasingly independent women 18 3. Understanding the mainstream consumer: new spending patterns 20 Growing discretionary spending 21 Aspirations-driven trading up 22 Emerging senior market 23 Evolving geographic differences 24 4. Understanding the mainstream consumer: behavioral patterns 26 The still-pragmatic consumer 27 The individual consumer 27 The increasingly loyal consumer 28 The modern shopper 29 5. Preparing for the 2020 consumer: implications for companies 34 Strategic imperatives 35 Growth enablers 37 Conclusion 37 Introduction Meet the 2020 Chinese consumer 7 Most large, consumer-facing companies have long realized that they will need China’s growth to power their own in the next decade. But to keep pace, they will also need to understand the economic, societal, and demographic changes that are shaping consumers’ profiles and the way they spend. This is no easy task, not only because of the fast pace of growth and subsequent changes being wrought on the Chinese way of life, but also because there are vast economic and demographic differences across China. These are set to become more marked, with significant implications for companies that fail to grasp them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Media Planning and Buying in 2021
    A Guide to Media Planning and Buying in 2021 www.mediatool.com 0 1 What's included? The ‘buckle up’ mantra won’t take you far in the new normal. Whether you’re an in- house marketer or an agency media planner, adapting to the new advertising climate is crucial. More than that, reinventing your digital marketing planning to be able to mirror consumers’ ever-evolving needs will be on every marketing leader’s agenda in 2021. If you’re looking for better ways to drive traffic, generate leads and deliver more ROI, start by leaving the old tactics behind. Table of contents 02 What is media planning? 03 Media planning vs. Media buying: what’s the difference? 06 The effects of COVID-19 on media planning 09 Your step by step guide to media planning 12 Media planning challenges 17 What's next? 0 2 What is media planning? Let’s get the semantics out of the way. Media planning refers to the process of identifying, assessing, and selecting media channels and platforms to reach a well-defined target audience. Media planners determine how, where, when, and why a business will share media content to boost awareness, reach, engagement, and drive ROI through paid advertising. A media planner is responsible for developing a coordinated media plan for a given advertising budget. The more that budget is optimized – or stretched, as they like to say in the media world – to reach the largest audience for the lowest cost, the more ROI can be generated. The sole purpose of media planning is to get a brand in front of the right audience at the right time and persuade them to purchase a product or service.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferences for Bipartisanship in the American Electorate Laurel
    Compromise vs. Compromises: Preferences for Bipartisanship in the American Electorate Laurel Harbridge* Assistant Professor, Northwestern University Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research [email protected] Scott Hall 601 University Place Evanston, IL 60208 (847) 467-1147 Neil Malhotra Associate Professor, Stanford Graduate School of Business [email protected] 655 Knight Way Stanford, CA 94035 (408) 772-7969 Brian F. Harrison PhD Candidate, Northwestern University [email protected] Scott Hall 601 University Place Evanston, IL 60208 * Corresponding author. We thank Time-Sharing Experiments in the Social Sciences (TESS) for providing the majority of the financial support of this project. TESS is funded by the National Science Foundation (SES- 0818839). A previous version of this paper was scheduled for presentation at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Abstract Public opinion surveys regularly assert that Americans want political leaders to work together and to engage in bipartisan compromise. If so, why has Congress become increasingly acrimonious even though the American public wants it to be “bipartisan”? Many scholars claim that this is simply a breakdown of representation. We offer another explanation: although people profess support for “bipartisanship” in an abstract sense, what they desire procedurally out of their party representatives in Congress is to not compromise with the other side. To test this argument, we conduct two experiments in which we alter aspects of the political context to see how people respond to parties (not) coming together to achieve broadly popular public policy goals. We find that citizens’ proclaimed desire for bipartisanship in actuality reflects self-serving partisan desires.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Dream
    1 The American Dream That American dream of a better, richer, and happier life for all our citizens of every rank . is the greatest contribution we have yet made to the thought and welfare of the world. —James Truslow Adams, The Epic of America On September 5, 2012, Benita Veliz, an undocumented youth advocate from San Antonio, Texas, took the podium during prime-time coverage of the Democratic National Convention. She made a plea for immigra- tion reform and urged fellow Latinos to reelect President Barack Obama because, she said, “he fought for my community.” Benita was brought to the United States as a child “like so many Americans of all races and backgrounds.” Unlike most of her U.S. citizen peers, Benita graduated at sixteen as the valedictorian of her high school and finished college at twenty with a double major, a record that would have made her eligible for citizenship if the Dream Act had passed in the U.S. Senate in 2010. First proposed in 2001 by Illinois senator Dick Durbin with bipartisan support, it was designed to give legal status to young immigrants who had entered the country before the age of sixteen and completed college study or military service. Benita explained, “I feel just as Ameri- can as any of my friends and neighbors. But I’ve had to live almost my entire life knowing that I could be deported.” She reminded her listeners, “When Congress failed to pass [the Dream Act], President Obama . took action so people like me can apply to stay in the country and contribute.” On June 15, 2012, late in the presidential campaign and under pressure from Latino groups, Obama issued an executive order that offered a temporary reprieve from deportation and short-term work authorization to young immigrants like her.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Ipg Inclusion Awards
    16AUG2018 2018 IPG INCLUSION AWARDS The IPG Inclusion Awards are a celebration of the measurable progress, excellence and commitment of IPG employees and agencies to diversity and inclusion. #IPGINSPIREDINCLUSIVITY 2018 IPG Inclusion Awards WELCOME Michael Roth Chairman and CEO, IPG REMARKS Khetsiwe Dlamini Chief of Staff and Interim Director of Strategic Partnership Division, UN Women FIRESIDE CHAT Heide Gardner SVP, Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer, IPG W. Kamau Bell Host, United Shades of America, CNN AGENCY AWARDS CEREMONY Community Impact Recognizes an agency for its commitment to diversity and inclusion through collaboration and partnerships with organizations specifically serving diverse groups. Weber Shandwick — LA LGBT Center ACCEPTING: Peter Gay, Executive Creative Director, Healthcare, Weber Shandwick Most Effective Targeted Campaign Recognizes an agency for a campaign that is intentionally inclusive and deliberate in reaching a specific diverse customer target based on non-stereotypical insights and imagery. Weber Shandwick — LA LGBT Center ACCEPTING: Peter Gay, Executive Creative Director, Healthcare, Weber Shandwick Best Internal Communications Program Recognizes an agency that has undertaken substantial efforts to communicate specific diversity and inclusion themes and/or to provide effective D+I training/education to a large number of employees for the purposes of achieving strategic goals associated with the agency’s D&I strategy, based on documented results. Campbell Ewald ACCEPTING: Kevin Wertz, Chief Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising: Dollars and Decisions
    PAGE ONE Economics® Advertising: Dollars and Decisions Jeannette N. Bennett, Senior Economic Education Specialist GLOSSARY “Mass demand has been created almost entirely through the Advertising: Communication used by busi- development of advertising.” nesses to persuade consumers to buy a 1 good or service. —Calvin Coolidge, October 27, 1926 Choice: A decision made between two or more possibilities or alternatives. Consumers: People who buy goods and Introduction services to satisfy their wants. Having dollars in your pocket is one thing; keeping them there is another. Decisionmaking: Deciding among choices (alternatives or options). With so many businesses selling goods and services, there’s a lot of com- petition in the marketplace for the money in your pocket. In fact, consumers Demand: The quantity of a good or service 2 that buyers are willing and able to buy at are bombarded with as many as 4,000 to 10,000 advertisements each day! all possible prices during a certain time This advertising is designed to increase or create demand for products period. by influencing consumers’ choices about spending. Through persuasion, Market (marketplace): Buyers and sellers some dollars in your pocket are spent because of advertising. coming together to exchange goods, services, and/or resources. Advertising Benefits Price: The amount of money, determined by the interaction of buyers and sellers, that Advertising benefits both buyers and sellers. It provides information to a buyer must pay to acquire a good, ser- consumers about new products available and the advantages of buying vice, or resource. and using the advertised goods or services. It’s also a low-cost way for Profit: The amount of revenue that remains consumers to get information; they simply have to view the information after a business pays the costs of produc- when it is placed in front of them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Look at the Failure of Mainstream Economics
    Volume 6 Issue 1 Article 2 March 2021 A critical look at the failure of mainstream economics Joseph M. Dipoli Salem State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/globe Part of the Economics Commons, Education Commons, and the International Business Commons This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the M3 Center at the University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee at Digital Commons @ University of South Florida. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Global Business Insights by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University of South Florida. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Dipoli, J. M. (2021). A critical look at the failure of mainstream economics. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 22-26. https://www.doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1073 Corresponding Author Joseph M. Dipoli, Department of Economics, Salem State University, 352 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Revisions Submission date: Apr. 12, 2019; 1st Revision: Sep. 20, 2020; 2nd Revision: Dec. 8, 2020; 3rd Revision: Feb. 27, 2021; Acceptance: Feb. 28, 2021 Dipoli: A critical look at the failure of mainstream economics A Critical Look at the Failure of Mainstream Economics Joseph M. Dipoli Department of Economy Salem State University [email protected] Book Review Foundations of real-world economics: What every economics student needs to know (2nd ed.), by John Komlos, New York, Routledge, 2019, 306 pp., $42.95 (Paperback), ISBN 9781138296541. Introduction Many people in the United States of America are dissatisfied with the outcomes of the economy and some are suggesting measures that seem socialistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising "In These Imes:"T How Historical Context Influenced Advertisements for Willa Cather's Fiction Erika K
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: English, Department of Department of English Spring 5-2014 Advertising "In These imes:"T How Historical Context Influenced Advertisements for Willa Cather's Fiction Erika K. Hamilton University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss Part of the American Literature Commons Hamilton, Erika K., "Advertising "In These Times:" How Historical Context Influenced Advertisements for Willa Cather's Fiction" (2014). Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English. 87. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss/87 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ADVERTISING “IN THESE TIMES:” HOW HISTORICAL CONTEXT INFLUENCED ADVERTISEMENTS FOR WILLA CATHER’S FICTION by Erika K. Hamilton A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: English Under the Supervision of Professor Guy Reynolds Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2014 ADVERTISING “IN THESE TIMES:” HOW HISTORICAL CONTEXT INFLUENCED ADVERTISEMENTS FOR WILLA CATHER’S FICTION Erika K. Hamilton, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2014 Adviser: Guy Reynolds Willa Cather’s novels were published during a time of upheaval. In the three decades between Alexander’s Bridge and Sapphira and the Slave Girl, America’s optimism, social mores, culture, literature and advertising trends were shaken and changed by World War One, the “Roaring Twenties,” and the Great Depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Havas Group Dentsu Aegis Network
    WPP OMNICOM PUBLICIS INTERPUBLIC DENTSU AEGIS HAVAS GROUP GROUP GROUPE GROUP NETWORK DOMANI Global CEO Sir Martin Sorrell ➜ J. WALTER THOMPSON ➜ WPP DIGITAL CEO & President John Wren ➜ NATIONAL ADVERTISING ➜ DIVERSIFIED AGENCY Chairman & CEO Maurice Lévy ➜ ➜ PUBLICIS MEDIA Chairman & CEO ➜ MCCANN ➜ MARKETING CEO, Dentsu Aegis Network and Chairman & CEO CEO Tamara Ingram SERVICES (continued) BBH DIRECT CEO Steve King WORLDGROUP SPECIALISTS (CMG) Established 1986 BLUE STATE DIGITAL Established 1986 AGENCIES Established 1926 Michael Roth Executive Officer, Dentsu Inc. Yannick Bolloré Number of countries 90+ Regional CEO (Americas) Chairman & CEO Headquarters London Headquarters New York Headquarters Paris Established 1961 Jerry Buhlmann Established 1835 COGNIFIDE CUSTOM PUBLISHING PUBLICIS Tim Jones Harris Diamond CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES MIRUM GOODBY, SILVERSTEIN CEO Kai Anderson, Number of countries 113 F.BIZ Number of countries 100+ AND PARTNERS CEDAR Number of countries 100+ COMMUNICATIONS Regional CEO (EMEA) Headquarters New York Established Dentsu (1901) Headquarters Puteaux SANTO McCANN Barry D. Rhoads Number of offices 3,000+ Employees 74,000+ Number of countries US only Employees 77,574 (continued) Iain Jacob Number of countries 100+ Aegis (1978) Number of countries 140+ GLOBANT Number of countries 3 Chairman & CEO CONTRACT Number of offices 1 Regional CEO (APAC) Employees 194,000 (inc. assocs) HOGARTH WORLDWIDE Revenue for 2015 $15.13bn Revenue for 2015 €9.60bn Employees 50,100 Harris Diamond CURRENT MARKETING Dentsu Aegis Network
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Megabrands Table of Contents
    2019 MEGABRANDS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OOH Industry Revenue Overview II. 2019 Top 100 OOH Advertisers III. 2019 Top 100 Overall Advertisers IV. 2019 Agency List - Top 100 OOH Advertisers V. 2019 Agency List - Top 100 Overall Advertisers VI. OOH Agencies & Specialists Overview OOH INDUSTRY OVERVIEW Top 10 OOH Revenue Categories by Quarter and Full Year 2019 2019 January - March OOH Advertising Expenditures Ranked By Total Spending Category Growth Percentage Change Jan - Mar Percent of Jan - Mar Jan - Mar Jan - Mar 2019 Total 2018 '19 vs '18 '19 vs '18 Industry Categories ($m) Revenue Rank ($m) Rank ($m) (%) MISC LOCAL SERVICES & AMUSEMENTS 435,139.6 24.5% 1 403,806.8 1 31,332.8 7.8% RETAIL 174,055.8 9.8% 2 175,932.4 2 -1,876.6 -1.1% MEDIA & ADVERTISING 163,399.3 9.2% 3 144,097.0 3 19,302.3 13.4% PUBLIC TRANSPORT, HOTELS & RESORTS 124,325.6 7.0% 4 122,314.9 5 2,010.7 1.6% RESTAURANTS 115,445.2 6.5% 5 130,692.7 4 -15,247.5 -11.7% FINANCIAL 106,564.8 6.0% 6 100,532.8 6 6,032.0 6.0% INSURANCE & REAL ESTATE 103,012.6 5.8% 7 87,128.4 8 15,884.2 18.2% GOVERNMENT, POLITICS & ORGS 94,132.2 5.3% 8 92,155.1 7 1,977.1 2.1% AUTOMOTIVE DEALERS & SERVICES 74,595.4 4.2% 9 75,399.6 9 -804.2 -1.1% SCHOOLS, CAMPS & SEMINARS 69,267.1 3.9% 10 70,373.0 10 -1,105.9 -1.6% Total Top Ten Categories 1,459,937.6 82.2% 1,402,432.7 57,504.9 Total 2019 January - March OOH Expenditures $1,776,079,816 Overall Percentage Change January - March '19 vs '18 6.0% Source: Kantar Media, OAAA - May 2019 Prepared by the Out of Home Advertising Association of America 2019 April -
    [Show full text]