DOCSLIB.ORG

Numerical Methods, Chemotaxis, Cross-Diffusion and Nonlocal Models

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Numerical Methods, Chemotaxis, Cross-Diffusion and Nonlocal Models Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Reaction-Diffusion Models and Bifurcation Theory Lecture 4: Numerical methods, chemotaxis, cross-diffusion and nonlocal models Junping Shi College of William and Mary, USA Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Advection-reaction-diffusion equations General initial-boundary value problem: ut = D∆u − V ·∇u + f (x, u), x ∈ Ω, t > 0, u(x, 0) = u0(x) ≥ 0, x ∈ Ω, Bu(x, t)= g(x), x ∈ ∂Ω, t > 0. 1-D problem: ut = duxx − aux + f (x, u), x ∈ (0, L), t > 0, ≥ ∈ u(x, 0) = u0(x) 0, x (0, L), dux (0, t) − au(0, t) = −b, t > 0, −dux (L, t)+ au(L, t)= cu(L, t), t > 0. Boundary conditions can be Dirichlet, Neumann, etc. Most most equations cannot be solved analytically, hence to visualize the solutions, we need to use numerical solutions. Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Setup of the finite difference method A sample problem ut = duxx − aux + f (u), x ∈ (0, L), t > 0, u(x, 0) = u0(x) ≥ 0, x ∈ (0, L), ux (0, t)= ux (L, t) = 0, t > 0. We divide the interval [0, L] to n equal subintervals [xi , xi+1], i = 1, 2, ··· , n, n + 1, with xi = xi−1 +∆x, x1 =0 and ∆x = L/n (which we call grid size.) We also denote the step size (in the time direction) by ∆t. We define i i i i−1 uj = u(x , tj ), tj = tj−1 +∆t, x = x +∆x, 1 ≤ j ≤ m, 1 ≤ i ≤ n + 1. Basic algorithm: 1 2 n+1 1. the vector [u1 , u1 , ··· , u1 ] is known (initial condition); 1 2 n+1 1 2 n+1 2. For j = 1 to j = n, define [uj+1, uj+1, ··· , uj+1 ] from [uj , uj , ··· , uj ]. Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions The grid Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Difference equations Approximate derivative by difference: ui − ui ui − ui i j+1 j i j j−1 ut (x , tj )= (forward difference), or ut (x , tj )= (backward ∆t ∆t difference) − ui+1 − ui ui − ui 1 i j j i j j ux (x , tj )= (forward difference), or ux (x , tj )= (backward ∆x ∆x difference) − ui+1 − 2ui + ui 1 i j j j ux (x , tj )= (central difference), (∆x)2 We use backward differences. Then ut = duxx − aux + f (u) becomes i i i+1 i i−1 i i−1 uj − uj− uj − 2uj + uj uj − uj 1 = d − a + f (ui ) ∆t (∆x)2 ∆x j i i+1 i i−1 i uj−1 = −ruj + (1 + 2r + s)uj − (r + s)uj − ∆t · f (uj ) d∆t a∆t where r = , s = . (∆x)2 ∆x This formula works for 2 ≤ i ≤ n but not i = 1 and i = n + 1 (boundary point) Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Boundary points i i+1 i i−1 i d∆t u − = −ru + (1 + 2r + s)u − (r + s)u − ∆tf (u ), where r = , j 1 j j j j (∆x)2 a∆t s = . ∆x 1 n+1 The definition of uj−1 and uj−1 would need the values outside of [0, L]. So we define 0 n+2 uj to be the value at x = −∆x and uj to be the value at x = L +∆x. u1 − u0 j j 0 1 Neumann boundary: ux (0) = 0: ux (0, tj )= = 0 so u = u . Then ∆x j j 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 1 uj−1 = −ruj + (1 + 2r + s)uj − (r + s)uj − ∆t · f (uj )= −ruj +(1+ r)uj − ∆t · f (uj ) n+1 n+2 n+1 n n+1 uj−1 = −ruj + (1 + 2r + s)uj − (r + s)uj − ∆t · f (uj )= n+1 n n+1 (1 + r + s)uj − (r + s)uj − ∆t · f (uj ) So we can put the equations in a matrix form: [uj−1]= A[uj ] − ∆t[f (uj )] where A is the (n + 1) × (n + 1) conversion matrix (for example n = 6) 1+ r −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r − − 00 0 0 0 r s 1+ r + s Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Implicit finite difference method Instead of [uj−1]= A[uj ] − [f (uj )] will use [uj−1]= A[uj ] − [f (uj−1)] Then −1 [uj ]= A ([uj−1]+∆t[f (uj−1)]) Remarks: 1. The key of the above method is to define the (n + 1) × (n + 1) matrix A. The rows from i = 2 to i = n are same regardless of boundary conditions, and the row i = 1 and i = n + 1 may change with different boundary conditions. a∆t 2. It also works for diffusion (no advection) equation with s = = 0, or advection ∆x d∆t (no diffusion) equation r = = 0. (∆x)2 3. It is more accurate if n is larger. Usually we take ∆t = O((∆x)2). Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions The code: Fisher-KPP equation and Neumann BC % Calculate the solution of Fisher-KPP equation with Neumann BC xl=0; %left endpoint xr=10; %right endpoint tfinal=10; %time to integrate dx=0.2; %spatial grid size dt=0.01; %time step size nx=(xr-xl)/dx+1; %number of spatial subintervals nt=tfinal/dt+1; %number of time steps diff=0.1; %diffusion coefficient a=1; %parameter: growth rate s=diff*dt/(dx*dx); %diffusion rate xmesh=linspace(xl,xr,nx); %vector in x direction tmesh=linspace(0,tfinal,nt); %vector in t direction U=zeros(nx,nt); %matrix of solution U(:,1)=0.4+0.1*sin(xmesh’); %initial condition Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions The code: Fisher-KPP equation and Neumann BC A=zeros(nx,nx); %diffusion matrix A(1,1)=1+s; A(1,2)=-s; %first row A(nx,nx-1)=-s; A(nx,nx)=1+s; %last row for i=2:nx-1 %other rows A(i,i)=1+2*s; A(i,i-1)=-s; A(i,i+1)=-s; end AA=inv(A); %take the inverse matrix for i=1:nt-1 %for time t for j=1:nx %for space x F(j)=U(j,i)+dt*(a*U(j,i)-U(j,i)*U(j,i)); % logistic nonlinearity end U(:,i+1)=AA*(F’); %multiply the inverse matrix end surf(tmesh,xmesh,U,’EdgeColor’,’none’); %graph in 3D Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Numerical results: Neumann boundary Left: 3D view of the solution; Right: 2D view of the solution Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions No flux boundary condition u1 − u0 j j 1 No flux boundary: dux (0) − au(0) = 0: dux (0, tj )= d = au so ∆x j 0 − a∆x 1 − s 1 uj = 1 d uj = 1 r uj . Then 1 2 1 0 1 uj−1 = −ruj + (1 + 2r+ s)uj − (r + s)uj − ∆t · f (uj )= 2 2 1 1 −ruj +(1+ r + s + s /r)uj − ∆t · f (uj ) 1+ r + s + s2/r −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0000 −r − s 1+ r + Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Periodic boundary condition ut = duxx − aux + f (u), x ∈ (0, L), t > 0, u(x, 0) = u0(x) ≥ 0, x ∈ (0, L), u(0, t) = u(L, t), ux (0, t)= ux (L, t), t > 0. 1 n+1 In this case: we think uj = uj , and we use n × n matrix instead of (n + 1) × (n + 1) matrix 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 −r − s −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r −r 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s So periodic boundary condition corresponds to a cyclic matrix! Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Dirichlet Boundary condition 1 n+1 In this case, uj and uj are always 0, so we use an (n − 1) × (n − 1) matrix 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s −r 0 0 0 0 0 −r − s 1 + 2r + s Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions The code: Fisher-KPP equation and Dirichlet BC A=zeros(nx-2,nx-2); A(1,1)=1+2*s; A(1,2)=-s; A(nx-2,nx-3)=-s; A(nx-2,nx-2)=1+2*s; for i=2:nx-3 A(i,i)=1+2*s; A(i,i-1)=-s; A(i,i+1)=-s; end AA=inv(A); for i=1:nt-1 for j=2:nx-1 F(j-1)=U(j,i)+dt*a*U(j,i)-dt*U(j,i)*U(j,i); end Utemp=AA*(F’); U(1,i+1)=0; U(nx,i+1)=0; for j=2:nx-1 U(j,i+1)=Utemp(j-1); end end Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Numerical results: Dirichlet Boundary Left: 3D view of the solution; Right: 2D view of the solution; Below: when t = tfinal (close to a steady state) 0.5 60 0.45 0.4 50 0.35 0.3 40 0.25 30 0.2 0.15 20 0.1 10 0.05 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Numerical results: KPP-Fisher with advection and Dirichlet Boundary Left: 3D view of the solution; Right: 2D view of the solution; Below: when t = tfinal (close to a steady state) 0.5 60 0.45 0.4 50 0.35 0.3 40 0.25 30 0.2 0.15 20 0.1 10 0.05 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Numerical Methods Chemotaxis Cross-diffusion Nonlocal models Conclusions Numerical methods for systems of equations ut = d1uxx − a1ux + f (u, v), x ∈ (0, L), t > 0, v = d v − a v + g(u, v), x ∈ (0, L), t > 0, t 2 xx 2 x u(x, 0) = u0(x), v(x, 0) = v0(x), x ∈ (0, L), ux (0, t)= ux (L, t) = 0, t > 0, vx (0, t)= vx (L, t) = 0, t > 0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protozoologica Special Issue: Protists in Soil Processes
    Acta Protozool. (2012) 51: 201–208 http://www.eko.uj.edu.pl/ap ActA doi:10.4467/16890027AP.12.016.0762 Protozoologica Special issue: Protists in Soil Processes Review paper Ecology of Soil Eumycetozoans Steven L. STEPHENSON1 and Alan FEEST2 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA; 2Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Bristol and Ecosulis ltd., Newton St Loe, Bath, United Kingdom Abstract. Eumycetozoans, commonly referred to as slime moulds, are common to abundant organisms in soils. Three groups of slime moulds (myxogastrids, dictyostelids and protostelids) are recognized, and the first two of these are among the most important bacterivores in the soil microhabitat. The purpose of this paper is first to provide a brief description of all three groups and then to review what is known about their distribution and ecology in soils. Key words: Amoebae, bacterivores, dictyostelids, myxogastrids, protostelids. INTRODUCTION that they are amoebozoans and not fungi (Bapteste et al. 2002, Yoon et al. 2008, Baudalf 2008). Three groups of slime moulds (myxogastrids, dic- One of the idiosyncratic branches of the eukary- tyostelids and protostelids) are recognized (Olive 1970, otic tree of life consists of an assemblage of amoe- 1975). Members of the three groups exhibit consider- boid protists referred to as the supergroup Amoebozoa able diversity in the type of aerial spore-bearing struc- (Fiore-Donno et al. 2010). The most diverse members tures produced, which can range from exceedingly of the Amoebozoa are the eumycetozoans, common- small examples (most protostelids) with only a single ly referred to as slime moulds. Since their discovery, spore to the very largest examples (certain myxogas- slime moulds have been variously classified as plants, trids) that contain many millions of spores.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Structure Learning Algorithm for Bayesian Networks Inspired by Physarum Polycephalum
    Physarum Learner: A Novel Structure Learning Algorithm for Bayesian Networks inspired by Physarum Polycephalum DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DES DOKTORGRADES DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (DR. RER. NAT.) DER FAKULTAT¨ FUR¨ BIOLOGIE UND VORKLINISCHE MEDIZIN DER UNIVERSITAT¨ REGENSBURG vorgelegt von Torsten Schon¨ aus Wassertrudingen¨ im Jahr 2013 Der Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht am: 21.05.2013 Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: Prof. Dr. Elmar W. Lang Unterschrift: Torsten Schon¨ ii iii Abstract Two novel algorithms for learning Bayesian network structure from data based on the true slime mold Physarum polycephalum are introduced. The first algorithm called C- PhyL calculates pairwise correlation coefficients in the dataset. Within an initially fully connected Physarum-Maze, the length of the connections is given by the inverse correla- tion coefficient between the connected nodes. Then, the shortest indirect path between each two nodes is determined using the Physarum Solver. In each iteration, a score of the surviving edges is increased. Based on that score, the highest ranked connections are combined to form a Bayesian network. The novel C-PhyL method is evaluated with different configurations and compared to the LAGD Hill Climber, Tabu Search and Simu- lated Annealing on a set of artificially generated and real benchmark networks of different characteristics, showing comparable performance regarding quality of training results and increased time efficiency for large datasets. The second novel algorithm called SO-PhyL is introduced and shown to be able to out- perform common score based structure learning algorithms for some benchmark datasets. SO-PhyL first initializes a fully connected Physarum-Maze with constant length and ran- dom conductivities. In each Physarum Solver iteration, the source and sink nodes are changed randomly and the conductivities are updated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa
    Protist, Vol. 162, 545–570, October 2011 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 July 2011 PROTIST NEWS A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa: Lobosa) Introduction together constitute the amoebozoan subphy- lum Lobosa, which never have cilia or flagella, Molecular evidence and an associated reevaluation whereas Variosea (as here revised) together with of morphology have recently considerably revised Mycetozoa and Archamoebea are now grouped our views on relationships among the higher-level as the subphylum Conosa, whose constituent groups of amoebae. First of all, establishing the lineages either have cilia or flagella or have lost phylum Amoebozoa grouped all lobose amoe- them secondarily (Cavalier-Smith 1998, 2009). boid protists, whether naked or testate, aerobic Figure 1 is a schematic tree showing amoebozoan or anaerobic, with the Mycetozoa and Archamoe- relationships deduced from both morphology and bea (Cavalier-Smith 1998), and separated them DNA sequences. from both the heterolobosean amoebae (Page and The first attempt to construct a congruent molec- Blanton 1985), now belonging in the phylum Per- ular and morphological system of Amoebozoa by colozoa - Cavalier-Smith and Nikolaev (2008), and Cavalier-Smith et al. (2004) was limited by the the filose amoebae that belong in other phyla lack of molecular data for many amoeboid taxa, (notably Cercozoa: Bass et al. 2009a; Howe et al. which were therefore classified solely on morpho- 2011). logical evidence. Smirnov et al. (2005) suggested The phylum Amoebozoa consists of naked and another system for naked lobose amoebae only; testate lobose amoebae (e.g. Amoeba, Vannella, this left taxa with no molecular data incertae sedis, Hartmannella, Acanthamoeba, Arcella, Difflugia), which limited its utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Slime Moulds
    Queen’s University Biological Station Species List: Slime Molds The current list has been compiled by Richard Aaron, a naturalist and educator from Toronto, who has been running the Fabulous Fall Fungi workshop at QUBS between 2009 and 2019. Dr. Ivy Schoepf, QUBS Research Coordinator, edited the list in 2020 to include full taxonomy and information regarding species’ status using resources from The Natural Heritage Information Centre (April 2018) and The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (February 2018); iNaturalist and GBIF. Contact Ivy to report any errors, omissions and/or new sightings. Based on the aforementioned criteria we can expect to find a total of 33 species of slime molds (kingdom: Protozoa, phylum: Mycetozoa) present at QUBS. Species are Figure 1. One of the most commonly encountered reported using their full taxonomy; common slime mold at QUBS is the Dog Vomit Slime Mold (Fuligo septica). Slime molds are unique in the way name and status, based on whether the species is that they do not have cell walls. Unlike fungi, they of global or provincial concern (see Table 1 for also phagocytose their food before they digest it. details). All species are considered QUBS Photo courtesy of Mark Conboy. residents unless otherwise stated. Table 1. Status classification reported for the amphibians of QUBS. Global status based on IUCN Red List of Threatened Species rankings. Provincial status based on Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre SRank. Global Status Provincial Status Extinct (EX) Presumed Extirpated (SX) Extinct in the
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Plasmodial Slime Moulds (Myxogastria): Measurement and Interpretation
    Protistology 1 (4), 161–178 (2000) Protistology August, 2000 Biodiversity of plasmodial slime moulds (Myxogastria): measurement and interpretation Yuri K. Novozhilova, Martin Schnittlerb, InnaV. Zemlianskaiac and Konstantin A. Fefelovd a V.L.Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, b Fairmont State College, Fairmont, West Virginia, U.S.A., c Volgograd Medical Academy, Department of Pharmacology and Botany, Volgograd, Russia, d Ural State University, Department of Botany, Yekaterinburg, Russia Summary For myxomycetes the understanding of their diversity and of their ecological function remains underdeveloped. Various problems in recording myxomycetes and analysis of their diversity are discussed by the examples taken from tundra, boreal, and arid areas of Russia and Kazakhstan. Recent advances in inventory of some regions of these areas are summarised. A rapid technique of moist chamber cultures can be used to obtain quantitative estimates of myxomycete species diversity and species abundance. Substrate sampling and species isolation by the moist chamber technique are indispensable for myxomycete inventory, measurement of species richness, and species abundance. General principles for the analysis of myxomycete diversity are discussed. Key words: slime moulds, Mycetozoa, Myxomycetes, biodiversity, ecology, distribu- tion, habitats Introduction decay (Madelin, 1984). The life cycle of myxomycetes includes two trophic stages: uninucleate myxoflagellates General patterns of community structure of terrestrial or amoebae, and a multi-nucleate plasmodium (Fig. 1). macro-organisms (plants, animals, and macrofungi) are The entire plasmodium turns almost all into fruit bodies, well known. Some mathematics methods are used for their called sporocarps (sporangia, aethalia, pseudoaethalia, or studying, from which the most popular are the quantita- plasmodiocarps).
    [Show full text]
  • Slime Molds: Biology and Diversity
    Glime, J. M. 2019. Slime Molds: Biology and Diversity. Chapt. 3-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological 3-1-1 Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 18 July 2020 and available at <https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 3-1 SLIME MOLDS: BIOLOGY AND DIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS What are Slime Molds? ....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-2 Identification Difficulties ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1- Reproduction and Colonization ........................................................................................................................... 3-1-5 General Life Cycle ....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-6 Seasonal Changes ......................................................................................................................................... 3-1-7 Environmental Stimuli ............................................................................................................................... 3-1-13 Light .................................................................................................................................................... 3-1-13 pH and Volatile Substances
    [Show full text]
  • The Mycetozoa of North America, Based Upon the Specimens in The
    THE MYCETOZOA OF NORTH AMERICA HAGELSTEIN, MYCETOZOA PLATE 1 WOODLAND SCENES IZ THE MYCETOZOA OF NORTH AMERICA BASED UPON THE SPECIMENS IN THE HERBARIUM OF THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN BY ROBERT HAGELSTEIN HONORARY CURATOR OF MYXOMYCETES ILLUSTRATED MINEOLA, NEW YORK PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR 1944 COPYRIGHT, 1944, BY ROBERT HAGELSTEIN LANCASTER PRESS, INC., LANCASTER, PA. PRINTED IN U. S. A. To (^My CJriend JOSEPH HENRI RISPAUD CONTENTS PAGES Preface 1-2 The Mycetozoa (introduction to life history) .... 3-6 Glossary 7-8 Classification with families and genera 9-12 Descriptions of genera and species 13-271 Conclusion 273-274 Literature cited or consulted 275-289 Index to genera and species 291-299 Explanation of plates 301-306 PLATES Plate 1 (frontispiece) facing title page 2 (colored) facing page 62 3 (colored) facing page 160 4 (colored) facing page 172 5 (colored) facing page 218 Plates 6-16 (half-tone) at end ^^^56^^^ f^^ PREFACE In the Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden are the large private collections of Mycetozoa made by the late J. B. Ellis, and the late Dr. W. C. Sturgis. These include many speci- mens collected by the earlier American students, Bilgram, Farlow, Fullmer, Harkness, Harvey, Langlois, Macbride, Morgan, Peck, Ravenel, Rex, Thaxter, Wingate, and others. There is much type and authentic material. There are also several thousand specimens received from later collectors, and found in many parts of the world. During the past twenty years my associates and I have collected and studied in the field more than ten thousand developments in eastern North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Physarum Polycephalum (Plasmodial Slime Mold)
    Physarum polycephalum (plasmodial slime mold) Species: polycephalum Genus: Physarum Family: Physaraceae Order: Physarales Class: Myxomycetes Phylum: Mycetozoa Kingdom: Amoebozoa Conditions for Customer Ownership We hold permits allowing us to transport these organisms. To access permit conditions, click here. Never purchase living specimens without having a disposition strategy in place. There are currently no USDA permits required for this organism. In order to protect our environment, never release a live laboratory organism into the wild. Primary Hazard Considerations Always wash your hands thoroughly before and after you handle your cultures, or anything it has touched. It is recommended to use gloves when working with mold, fungus, or bacteria. Availability Physarum is available year round. Care Habitat • Plasmodial stage are shipped in a Petri dish on Physarum agar with oats. Your Physarum should be bright yellow in color, and fan shaped. If your Physarum takes on a different appearance it may be contaminated. Contaminated cultures occur when a foreign specimen (something other than Physarum) makes its way onto your culture. This culture should be stored at room temperature in a dark place. The culture should be viable for about 1–2 weeks in its current container. • Sclerotia are hardened masses of irregular form consisting of many minute cell-like components. These are shipped on cut strips of filter paper in a tube. The culture should be stored at room temperature and can be stored in this stage for several months. Care: • Physarum is subcultured onto Physarum agar, and is incubated at room temperature or 25 °C. To maintain viability, plasmodial Physarum should be subcultured weekly.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the SOCIETY LIBRARY CATALOGUE the BMS Council
    THE SOCIETY LIBRARY CATALOGUE The BMS Council agreed, many years ago, to expand the Society's collection of books and develop it into a Library, in order to make it freely available to members. The books were originally housed at the (then) Commonwealth Mycological Institute and from 1990 - 2006 at the Herbarium, then in the Jodrell Laboratory,Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, by invitation of the Keeper. The Library now comprises over 1100 items. Development of the Library has depended largely on the generosity of members. Many offers of books and monographs, particularly important taxonomic works, and gifts of money to purchase items, are gratefully acknowledged. The rules for the loan of books are as follows: Books may be borrowed at the discretion of the Librarian and requests should be made, preferably by post or e-mail and stating whether a BMS member, to: The Librarian, British Mycological Society, Jodrell Laboratory Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB Email: <[email protected]> No more than two volumes may be borrowed at one time, for a period of up to one month, by which time books must be returned or the loan renewed. The borrower will be held liable for the cost of replacement of books that are lost or not returned. BMS Members do not have to pay postage for the outward journey. For the return journey, books must be returned securely packed and postage paid. Non-members may be able to borrow books at the discretion of the Librarian, but all postage costs must be paid by the borrower.
    [Show full text]
  • Vita: OR Anderson
    CURRICULUM VITA O. Roger Anderson [Updated May 2020] BIRTH DATE: August 4, 1937 OCCUPATION: Microbial Physiological Ecologist, Biologist, and Educator PROFESSIONAL RANK: Professor of Natural Sciences, Columbia University T. C., 1964-present Teachers College ; Department Chairman, 1974-1980, 1993-1996, 2000-2017 Senior Research Scientist (Adj.), Biology, 1967-present Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Faculty Member at Large, Columbia University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. 1993-present DEGREES: Bachelor of Arts (Botany) Washington University, St. Louis 1959 Master of Arts (Biological Education) Washington University 1961 Doctorate (Biology and Education) Washington University 1964 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (TEACHING): 1963-64 Washington University, St. Louis 1964-67 Assistant Professor of Natural Sciences Columbia University, Teachers College 1968-70 Associate Professor of Natural Sciences Columbia University, Teachers College 1971- Professor of Natural Sciences Columbia University, Teachers College 1992-1993 College Research Coordinator, Teachers College. 1993-1996 Associate Director, Division of Instruction, T. C. OFFICES IN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS: 1976 President, National Association for Res. Science Teaching (International) 1993-95 President, Columbia University Chapter Sigma Xi Honorary Scientific Society (National) 1995 President, International Society of Protistology (International) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Physarum Polycephalum
    Title Study on biological transport network utilizing plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum Author(s) 秋田, 大 Citation 北海道大学. 博士(生命科学) 甲第12720号 Issue Date 2017-03-23 DOI 10.14943/doctoral.k12720 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/65417 Type theses (doctoral) File Information Dai_Akita.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Study on biological transport network utilizing plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum (モジホコリ変形体を用いた生物学的輸送ネットワー クの研究) AKITA Dai (秋田 大) Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University March, 2017 3 Contents Abstract 5 Chapter 1 Introduction 7 Chapter 2 Backgrounds and Reviews 11 2.1 Rules of transport network . 11 2.1.1 Horton's law on river network . 11 2.1.2 Diameter exponent of biological transport network . 13 2.1.3 Transport network theory underlying scaling low . 16 2.2 Physarum polycephalum as a model organism . 17 2.2.1 Biology of slime mold . 17 2.2.2 Information processing of Physarum polycephalum . 20 2.2.3 Current-reinforcement model for vein network of Physarum polycephalum .......................... 22 2.2.3.1 Outline . 22 2.2.3.2 Theory to find flows in vein network . 24 Chapter 3 Materials and Methods 27 3.1 Culture of plasmodia . 27 3.2 Establishment of an evacuation network from a confined space . 28 3.3 Quantitative analysis of the network organisation and transport ca- pacity . 29 3.4 Validation methods for Murray's law . 29 Chapter 4 Results 31 4.1 Emergence of vein network and evacuation kinetics . 31 4.1.1 Evacuation networks form rapidly and remain topologically stable .
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Ogres: Cannibalistic Growth in Giant Phagotrophs
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/262378; this version posted February 12, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bloomfield, 2018-02-08 – preprint copy - bioRχiv The evolution of ogres: cannibalistic growth in giant phagotrophs Gareth Bloomfell MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambrilge, UK [email protected] twitter.com/iliomorph Abstract Eukaryotes span a very large size range, with macroscopic species most often formel in multicellular lifecycle stages, but sometimes as very large single cells containing many nuclei. The Mycetozoa are a group of amoebae that form macroscopic fruiting structures. However the structures formel by the two major mycetozoan groups are not homologous to each other. Here, it is proposel that the large size of mycetozoans frst arose after selection for cannibalistic feeling by zygotes. In one group, Myxogastria, these zygotes became omnivorous plasmolia; in Dictyostelia the evolution of aggregative multicellularity enablel zygotes to attract anl consume surrounling conspecifc cells. The cannibalism occurring in these protists strongly resembles the transfer of nutrients into metazoan oocytes. If oogamy evolvel early in holozoans, it is possible that aggregative multicellularity centrel on oocytes coull have precelel anl given rise to the clonal multicellularity of crown metazoa. Keyworls: Mycetozoa; amoebae; sex; cannibalism; oogamy Introduction – the evolution of Mycetozoa independently in several diverse lineages, presumably reflecting strong selection for effective dispersal [9]. The dictyostelids (social amoebae or cellular slime moulds) and myxogastrids (also known as myxomycetes and true or The close relationship between dictyostelia and myxogastria acellular slime moulds) are protists that form macroscopic suggests that they shared a common ancestor that formed fruiting bodies (Fig.
    [Show full text]