DOCSLIB.ORG

33 a BIBLIOGRAPHY of HURON-PETUN ARCHAEOLOGY L. J. Jackson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Jackson: HURON-PETUN BIBLIOGRAPHY 33 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF HURON-PETUN ARCHAEOLOGY L. J. Jackson INTRODUCTION This bibliography is intended as a research guide for archaeologists studying the Huron-Petun branch of Iroquoian development in Ontario as chronologically and geog- raphically delimited by J. V. Wright in his monograph The Ontario Iroquois Tradition (1966:66-7). A set of six main indices has been used to distinguish sub-areas of study. While this bibliography refers most specifically to the Huron and Petun, numerous references to related Iroquoian groups have been included for comparative purposes. The net result is coverage of Iroquoian developments in the Great Lakes region through- out the Late Woodland period. INDICES 1. PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGY: includes field records and site reports dealing prin- cipally with prehistoric Huron-Petun sites. 2. HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY: includes studies and site reports on European and Huron-Petun contact sites. 3. NATIVE HABITAT: includes studies and reports on the natural resources and site characteristics of the Huron-Petun region. focusing on Simcoe County. 4. NATIVE TECHNOLOGY: includes technical studies, research guides and reports dealing mainly with the material culture of the Huron-Petun and with aboriginal techniques of manufacture. 5. TRADE GOODS: includes reports and research guides dealing with the appearance of European material goods on aboriginal sites. 6. CULTURAL STUDIES: includes miscellaneous archaeological, historical and sociological studies examining Huron-Petun and Iroquoian culture in general. * An additional section, HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS, is appended as a preliminary guide to primary historical sources dealing with the contact period prior to the demise of the Huron and Petun in the seventeenth century. No cross referencing has been attempted and apologies are hereby offered for any internal inconsistencies or significant oversights. While certain incidental references have been omitted and others overlooked, it is hoped that this bibliography will help researchers bypass needless hours of library searching. PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGY Anderson, James E. 1964 "The People of Fairty: An Osteological Analysis of an Iroquois Os- suary." National Museum of Canada, Bulletin No. 193, pp. 28-129. Ottawa. 1968 The Serpent Mounds Site Physical Anthropology. Occasional Paper 2, Royal Ontario Museum, Art and Archaeology Division, Toronto. Anderson, J. E. and J. V. Wright 1969 The Bennett Site. Bulletin No. 229, National Museum of Canada, Ottawa. This bibliography has attempted to include the major references on this subject to April of 1975. 34 ONTARIO ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 28 Anonymous 1948 "A Note on the Excavation of a Huron Ossuary. " Ontario Historical Society, Papers and Records, Vol. 40:92-3. Toronto. 1949 "A Preliminary Note on the Black Creek Excavation." Ontario History 41, 2:98-9. Toronto. 1950 "Archaeological Activities in Ontario." Canadian Historical Review 31, 4:441-2. Toronto. Beeman, T. W. 1891 "Lanark County. " Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1891, pp. 15-18. Toronto. 1894 "Lanark County." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1894, pp. 15-17. Toronto. 1896 "Lanark County." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1896, pp. 71-2. Toronto. Bell, W. Douglas 1953 "The McMurchy Site: A Petun Site in Gray County, Ontario." Unpub- lished manuscript on file with the Department of Anthropology, Univer- sity of Toronto. (Also on file with the Ontario Archaeological Society Library.) 1963 "The Guyatt Site." Pennsylvania Archaeologist 33, 1-2:16-23. Pittsburgh. Boyle, David 1888 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1886-87, pp. 9-56. Toronto. 1889 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1887-88, pp. 16-54. Toronto. 1890 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1888-89, pp. 21-42. Toronto. 1891 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1891, pp. 5-57. To- ronto. 1892 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, /890-91, pp. 8-72. Toronto. Boyle, David 1896 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1895, pp. 29-73. To- ronto. 1897 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1896-97, pp. 49-67. Toronto. 1900 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1899, pp. 2-40. To- ronto. 1901 "Notes." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1900, pp. 11-25. To- ronto. 1902 "Ossuary in Clinton Township, Lincoln County. " Annual Archaeologi- cal Report, Ontario, 1901, pp. 22-4. Toronto. 1903 "Ossuary at Bradford ... Warwick ... Orillia." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1902, pp. 34-7. Toronto. Canada, National Museum, Division of Archaeology, Manuscript Files, Bruce County Section. Ottawa. The abbreviated form Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario refers to the series of archaeological reports issued as an appendix to the Report of the Minister of Education, Ontario. 28 Jackson: HURON-PETUN BIBLIOGRAPHY 35 Canada, National Museum, Division of Archaeology, Manuscript Files, Gray County Section. Ottawa. Canada, National Museum, Division of Archaeology, Manuscript Files, Ontario County Section. Ottawa. Canada, National Museum, Division of Archaeology, Manuscript Files, Simcoe County Section. Ottawa. Chamberlain, A. F. 1890 "The Archaeology of Scugog Island." Proceedings of the Canadian Institute, Session 1888-1889, 3rd Series, Vol. 7, pp. 14-15. Toronto. Channen, E. R. and N. D. Clarke 1965 The Copeland Site: A Pre-Contact Huron Site in Simcoe County, On- tario. National Museum of Canada, Anthropology Papers, No. 8. Ottawa. Churcher, C. S. and W. A. Kenyon 1960 "The Tabor Hill Ossuaries: A Study in Iroquois Demography." Human Biology 32, 3:249-73. Detroit. Clarke, C. H. D. 1958 "Archaeology of Algonquin Park." Ontario History 50, 1:58. Toronto. Coyne, J. H. 1893 "The Southwold Earthwork and the Country of the Neutrals." Annual Archaeological Report, Ontario, 1892-93, pp. 22-34. Toronto. Cruickshank, J. C. and C. E. Heidenreich 1969 "Pedological Investigations at the Huron Indian Village of Cahiague." The Canadian Geographer 13, 1:34-46. Toronto. Dade, Rev. C. 1852 "Indian Remains—Being a Description of an Indian Burial Ground in Beverly Township, Ten Miles from Dundas." Canadian Journal 1:6. Toronto. Dailey, Robert C. and James V. Wright 1955 "The Malcolm Site." Transactions ofthe Royal Canadian Institute, Vol. 31, Part 1, pp. 3-23. Toronto. Danard, Jean 1960 "The Mystery of the Miller Site." Imperial Oil Review 44, 1:6-9. To- ronto. Donaldson, William S. 1962a "The Thomas Site: A Late Prehistoric Village." Ontario Archaeology, Series B, No. 2, Publication No. 7, pp. 21-39. Toronto. 1962b "The Boyd Site: A Report and Appraisal." Ontario Archaeology, Series B, No. 2, Publication No. 7, pp. 4-20. Toronto. 1962c "The Short Site: A Preliminary Report." Ontario Archaeology, Series A, No. 5, Publication No. 6, pp. 1-7. Toronto. 1962d "Archaeological Research in the Rouge." Ontario Archaeology, Series A, No. 5, Publication No. 6, pp. 15-21. Toronto. 1965a "Iroquoian Development in the Rouge Watershed, Ontario—Part I: The Elliot Site." Ontario Archaeology, Series B, No. 3, Publication No. 8, pp. 18-38. Toronto. 1965b "The King's Forest Park Site." Ontario Archaeology, Series B, No. 3, Publication No. 8, pp. 3-10. Toronto. 36 ONTARIO ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 28 Emerson, J. Norman 1950 "Woodbridge Longhouse." American Antiquity 15, 4:356. Menasha. 1954 "The Archaeology of the Ontario Iroquois." Ph.D. Dissertation on file with the University of Chicago. 1958 "The Benson Site, Victoria County, Ontario." Unpublished manuscript and notes on file with the Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto. 1959 "The Bosomworth Site." New Pages of Prehistory, 1958, Ontario His- tory 51, 1:61-3. Toronto. 1960 "A Further Note on the McDonald Site, Prince Edward County." New Pages of Prehistory, 1959, Ontario History 52, 1:60-1. Toronto. 1961 "Cahiague." Public Lecture Series. University of Toronto Archaeologi- cal Field School at the Cahiague Village Site, Simcoe County, Ontario. June 15 - August 15. 1962 "Cahiague 1961." New Pages of Prehistory, 1961, Ontario History 54, 2:134-6. Toronto. 1964 "The Case for Cahiague, Capital Village of the Hurons in 1615." Unpub- lished manuscript on file with the National Historic Sites Service, De- partment of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa. 1965 "The Cahiague Village Palisade." Manuscript report on file with the Department of Public Records and Archives, Toronto. 1967 "The Payne Site: An Iroquoian Manifestation in Price Edward County, Ontario." National Museum of Canada, Contributions to Anthropology V: Archaeology and Physical Anthropology, Bulletin No. 206, pp. 125-257. Ottawa. Finlayson, William D. 1971 "The 1971 Excavations at the Donaldson Site: A Preliminary Report." Canadian Archaeological Association, Bulletin No. 3, pp. 12-27. Ot- tawa. Fitting, James E. 1965 "Late Woodland Cultures of Southeastern Michigan." Museum of An- thropology, University of Michigan, Anthropological Paper No. 24. Ann Arbor. Fox, W. A. 1967 "A Hillside Midden, King's Forest Park Site." Ontario Archaeology, Publication No. 10, pp. 34-9. Toronto. 1971 "The Maurice Village Site BeHa-2: Lithic Analysis." Palaeoecology and Ontario Prehistory, ed. by W. Hurley and C. E. Heidenreich. De- partment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Research Report No. 2, pp. 116-36. Funk, R. E. 1967 "Garoga: A Late Prehistoric Iroquois Village in the Mohawk Valley." Iroquois Culture, History and Prehistory, ed. by E. Tooker, pp. 9-11. Albany. Garrad, C. 1965 "The Rediscovery of a Forgotten Ossuary in the Township of Not- tawasaga, Ontario."
Recommended publications
  • Summary Report of the Geological Survey for the Calendar Year 1911

    Summary Report of the Geological Survey for the Calendar Year 1911

    5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26 A. 1915 SUMMARY REPORT OK THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF MINES FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1914 PRINTED BY ORDER OF PARLIAMENT. OTTAWA PRTNTKD BY J. i»k L TAOHE, PRINTER TO THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT IfAJESTS [No. 26—1915] [No , 15031 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26 A. 1915 To Field Marshal, Hit Hoi/al Highness Prince Arthur William Patrick Albert, Duke of Connaught and of Strath-earn, K.G., K.T., K.P., etc., etc., etc., Governor General and Commander in Chief of the Dominion of Canada. May it Please Youb Royal Highness.,— The undersigned has the honour to lay before Your Royal Highness— in com- pliance with t>-7 Edward YIT, chapter 29, section IS— the Summary Report of the operations of the Geological Survey during the calendar year 1914. LOUIS CODERRK, Minister of Mines. 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26 A. 1915 To the Hon. Louis Codebrk, M.P., Minister of Mines, Ottawa. Sir,—I have the honour to transmit, herewith, my summary report of the opera- tions of the Geological Survey for the calendar year 1914, which includes the report* of the various officials on the work accomplished by them. I have the honour to be, sir, Your obedient servant, R. G. MrCOXXFI.L, Deputy Minister, Department of Mines. B . SESSIONAL PAPER No. 28 A. 1915 5 GEORGE V. CONTENTS. Paok. 1 DIRECTORS REPORT REPORTS FROM GEOLOGICAL DIVISION Cairncs Yukon : D. D. Exploration in southwestern "" ^ D. MacKenzie '\ Graham island. B.C.: J. M 37 B.C.
  • Highlands OPP Go After Local Grow

    Highlands OPP Go After Local Grow

    HALIBURTON COUNTY’S INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER FREE 6,500 copies TheHighlanderThursday 20 September 2012 | Issue 50 Photo by Warren Riley Team ‘Scott 3 Rox’ leads the pack at the start of Stage 2 of ‘Crank the Shield’. For full story see page 18. Highlands OPP go after local grow ops By Matthew Desrosiers of oxycontin, percocets, marijuana resin and other prescription continue to be a concern for police in the county. medicines. “This time of year, we do get an increased number of calls The Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) are reminding Highlands Harry Mazlowski, 43, of Minden Hills, Stephen Dow, 46, for service regarding marijuana plants being located on residents of the dangers associated with outdoor marijuana of Dysart et al, and Armand Teofilo, 39, of Severn Township, various properties throughout the county,” she said. “That is grow operations after a large bust in Minden earlier this were each charged with production of marijuana, two counts because the plants are maturing, and it is harvest time.” month. of possession for the purpose of trafficking, unauthorized Because these operations often involve organized crime, On Sept. 6, officers from the OPP Organized Crime possession of a firearm, careless use of a firearm, and Adams said they can be very dangerous to the community. Enforcement Bureau, Central Region Drug Unit and possession of property obtained by crime over $5,000. “It is a very lucrative business,” she said. “We have seen Emergency Response Team executed a warrant on a Minden The total value of the drugs seized was over $92,000, with increased violence in recent years, with suspects trying to grow op that resulted in the seizure of 73 large marijuana an additional $5,000 in Canadian currency.
  • Rank of Pops

    Rank of Pops

    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
  • County of Haliburton Natural Heritage Mapping: a Compilation and Preliminary Assessment

    County of Haliburton Natural Heritage Mapping: a Compilation and Preliminary Assessment

    County of Haliburton Natural Heritage Mapping: A Compilation and Preliminary Assessment Prepared for: Haliburton Highlands Land Trust PO Box 792 Minden, ON K0M 2k0 May, 2007 Prepared by: Glenside Ecological Services Limited 2490 Horseshoe Lake Rd. R.R.#1 Phone: 705-286-3181 Minden, Ontario Fax: 705-286-6582 Canada K0M 2K0 Email: [email protected] Web: www.glenside-eco.ca Project 07009 County of Haliburton Natural Heritage Mapping TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................4 Background.................................................................................................................................. 2 Purpose and Scope of Study ........................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................... 3 THE GREAT LAKES CONSERVATION BLUEPRINT.....................................................4 Overview...................................................................................................................................... 5 Aquatic Biodiversity......................................................................................................................... 5 Terrestrial Biodiversity..................................................................................................................... 6 Results.........................................................................................................................................
  • Looking for a Boiler Supply & Servicing Company with The

    Looking for a Boiler Supply & Servicing Company with The

    Service Area Volume 49 • June 2017 South West tel: 519 884 0600 505 Dotzert Court, fax: 519 884 0213 Unit 1 toll free: 1 800 265 8809 Waterloo, ON N2L 6A7 www.waterloomanufacturing.ca East tel: 613 228 3597 19 Grenfell Crescent, Bay 1 fax: 613 225 0116 Ottawa (Nepean) ON toll free: 1 800 265 8809 K2G 0G3 www.waterloomanufacturing.ca Looking For A Boiler Supply & Servicing Company With The Knowledge & Experience To Get It Right? We are that company and we want to help you optimize your boiler room. Established in 1850, Waterloo Manufacturing Ltd. has a long history of growth and evolution that continues to this day. In our early days we began as a manufacturer of farm machinery equipment, steam engines, pulp and paper rolls, and in 1947, became an authorized Cleaver Brooks Representative for South West Ontario. In 1984, we streamlined the company to further focus on solely providing boiler room equipment solutions in South West Ontario. In 2015, a unique opportunity arose to expand our company to include the Eastern Ontario region formerly covered by John M. Schermerhorn Ltd. In 2017, a further opportunity arose to expand our company to include the territory formerly represented by Johnson Paterson, Inc. to be the sole representative for Cleaver Brooks in the province of Ontario. *Refer to Map on Page 4. Ontario West Central Ontario Ontario East • Brant County • Algoma District • Carleton County • Bruce County • Cochrane District • Dundas County • Dufferin County • Durham County • Frontenac County • Elgin County • Haliburton County • Glengarry
  • Land Ambulance Service Delivery Options

    Land Ambulance Service Delivery Options

    TO: Chair and Members Corporate and Emergency Services Committee FROM: Terri Burton Director, Emergency Services DATE: February 18, 2015 SUBJECT: Land Ambulance Service Delivery Options REPORT NO: CES-4-2015-5 RECOMMENDATION None. For information only. ORIGIN The Province of Ontario, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, transferred responsibility for land ambulance delivery to upper-tier municipalities (UTMs) (and service boards where no upper-tier exists), effective January 1, 2001. The District of Muskoka (District) contracted the delivery of ambulance services through a Request for Proposal process in 1999 and again in 2008. The District’s current contract with Medavie EMS Ontario is scheduled to expire December 31, 2015. BACKGROUND The Emergency Health Services Branch (EHSB) of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care oversees air and land ambulance services in Ontario, as well as, ambulance communication centres that are responsible for dispatching those services. EHSB manages and regulates land ambulance services provided by upper-tier municipalities and District Social Services Administration Boards by establishing standards for the management, operation and use of ambulance services and ensuring compliance to those standards. The Ambulance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A.19, as amended by the Services Improvement Act, 1997, sets out the legislative framework for the funding and delivery of land ambulance services under Municipal jurisdiction. The District provides 24 hours per day, 7 days per week land ambulance service delivery throughout Muskoka and neighbouring communities when requested. The District and its contractor are collectively responsible for: Administration and records management; Page 1 Recruitment, hiring, training and review of staff performance; Scheduling work rosters; Productivity and quality regulations assurance; Liaison with related agencies and levels of government; Fleet and facilities maintenance; Budget preparation; and Policy and procedure development and implementation.
  • Social Networks in the History of Archaeology. Placing Archaeology in Its Context

    Social Networks in the History of Archaeology. Placing Archaeology in Its Context

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Repository of the Freie Universität Berlin Amara Thornton Social Networks in the History of Archaeology. Placing Archaeology in its Context Summary This paper explores the value of social networks in the history of archaeology, combining them with biography and prosopography to produce a practical method for examining the development of the discipline, and an alternative to the traditional history of archaeology narrative. It presents broad categories for the interpretation and visualization of social net- works, illuminated by case studies focusing on linked political and archaeological networks in early British Mandate Palestine and Transjordan. Social networks are a tool for under- standing the historical context of archaeological work, and can be utilized to explore the role of men and women, politicians, soldiers, artists, architects, funders and others, in the excavation, interpretation, presentation and reception of archaeology. Keywords: Archaeology; social networks; biography; prosopography; history; British Mandate Palestine and Transjordan. Der Artikel untersucht die Bedeutung von sozialen Netzwerken in der Geschichte der Ar- chäologie. Im Rückgriff auf biographische und prosopographische Ansätze soll eine geeig- nete Methode zur Untersuchung der Entwicklung des Fachs herausgearbeitet werden und eine Alternative zu den traditionellen Erzählungen in der Archäologiegeschichte. Anhand einer Fallstudie über die miteinander verbundenen politischen und archäologischen Netz- werke in den frühen britischen Mandaten Palästina und Transjordanien werden allgemeine Kategorien für die Interpretation und Visualisierung von sozialen Netzwerken diskutiert. Die Analyse sozialer Netzwerke gibt Einblick in den historischen Kontext archäologischer Arbeit und erlaubt es, die Rollen von Männern und Frauen, Politikern, Soldaten, Künstlern, Architekten und Sponsoren bei der Ausgrabung, Interpretation, Präsentation und Rezepti- on von Archäologie zu untersuchen.
  • Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin

    Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 133 September 1951 DETROIT RIVER GROUP IN THE MICHIGAN BASIN By Kenneth K. Landes UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, D. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction............................ ^ Amherstburg formation................. 7 Nomenclature of the Detroit River Structural geology...................... 14 group................................ i Geologic history ....................... ^4 Detroit River group..................... 3 Economic geology...................... 19 Lucas formation....................... 3 Reference cited........................ 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Location of wells and cross sections used in the study .......................... ii 2. Correlation chart . ..................................... 2 3. Cross sections A-«kf to 3-G1 inclusive . ......................;.............. 4 4. Facies map of basal part of Dundee formation. ................................. 5 5. Aggregate thickness of salt beds in the Lucas formation. ........................ 8 6. Thickness map of Lucas formation. ........................................... 10 7. Thickness map of Amherstburg formation (including Sylvania sandstone member. 11 8. Lime stone/dolomite facies map of Amherstburg formation ...................... 13 9. Thickness of Sylvania sandstone member of Amherstburg formation.............. 15 10. Boundary of the Bois Blanc formation in southwestern Michigan.
  • Collecting the World

    Collecting the World

    Large print text Collecting the World Please do not remove from this display Collecting the World Founded in 1753, the British Museum opened its doors to visitors in 1759. The Museum tells the story of human cultural achievement through a collection of collections. This room celebrates some of the collectors who, in different ways, have shaped the Museum over four centuries, along with individuals and organisations who continue to shape its future. The adjoining galleries also explore aspects of collecting. Room 1: Enlightenment tells the story of how, in the early Museum, objects and knowledge were gathered and classified. Room 2a: The Waddesdon Bequest, displays the collection of Renaissance and Baroque masterpieces left to the British Museum by Baron Ferdinand Rothschild MP at his death in 1898. Gallery plan 2 Expanding Horizons Room 1 Enlightenment Bequest Waddesdon The Room 2a 1 3 The Age Changing of Curiosity Continuity 4 Today and Tomorrow Grenville shop 4 Collecting the World page Section 1 6 The Age of Curiosity, 18th century Section 2 2 5 Expanding Horizons, 19th century Section 3 80 Changing Continuity, 20th century Section 4 110 Today and Tomorrow, 21st century Portraits at balcony level 156 5 Section 1 The Age of Curiosity, 18th century Gallery plan 2 Expanding Horizons 1 3 The Age Changing of Curiosity Continuity 4 Today and Tomorrow 6 18th century The Age of Curiosity The Age of Curiosity The British Museum was founded in 1753 as a place of recreation ‘for all studious and curious persons’. Its founding collection belonged to the physician Sir Hans Sloane (1660–1753).
  • County of Haliburton Tourism Committee Agenda Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:00 O'clock A.M

    County of Haliburton Tourism Committee Agenda Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:00 O'clock A.M

    County of Haliburton Tourism Committee Agenda Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:00 o'clock a.m. County Council Chambers Page 1. ADOPTION OF AGENDA 2. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING 2-5 Minutes of the May 13, 2015 County Tourism Committee 4. DELEGATIONS 5. ITEMS OF BUSINESS 6 Monthly Department Report 7-9 Culinary Tourism Project 10-19 Results of Gateway Signage RFP 20 County Tourism Website Preview 21 Sale of Roots Clothing in Municipal Facilities 6. HALIBURTON HIGHLANDS TOURISM COMMITTEE UPDATE 22 May 20, 2015 Update 7. BUDGET UPDATE 23-24 Revenue and Expenditure report of the Period Ending May 31, 2015 8. CLOSED SESSION 9. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION 10. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 24 County of Haliburton County Tourism Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 13, 2015 The County of Haliburton Tourism Marketing Committee convened a meeting on Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. in the County Council Chambers with the following in attendance: Council: Councillor Carol Moffatt, Chair Reeve Algonquin Highlands Councillor Suzanne Partridge, Vice Chair Deputy Reeve Highlands East Councillor Brent Devolin Reeve Minden Hills Warden Murray Fearrey Reeve Dysart et al Dale Rider Haliburton Highlands Tourism Regrets: Bruce Ballentine Haliburton Highlands Tourism Bill Dodds Public Appointee Staff: Jim Wilson CAO/County Clerk Amanda Virtanen Director of Tourism Michele Moore Deputy County Clerk ADOPTION OF AGENDA The Committee Chair opened the meeting at 10:30 a.m. Motion No. T 27 2015 Moved by: Councillor Brent Devolin Seconded by: Dale Rider Be it resolved that the May 13, 2015 Haliburton County Council Tourism Committee agenda be approved CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST The Committee members did not disclose any pecuniary interest.
  • We're Here2slgbtq+ Youth Across Ontario Assert Needs And

    We're Here2slgbtq+ Youth Across Ontario Assert Needs And

    2SLGBTQ+ Youth across Ontario Assert Needs We’re and Experiences Here A SUMMARY REPORT 2020 LGBT YouthLine acknowledges that the land we work on throughout Ontario is colonized land, and encompasses an array of Indigenous territories. YouthLine works in this community, in this context, on this territory. LGBT YouthLine’s Provincial This Summary Report highlights Youth Ambassador Project (PYAP) research findings, and is inclusive of brought together 18 2SLGBTQ+ all populations and identities. Youth Ambassadors from across Ontario to lead an assessment To ensure the prioritization of about the experiences and needs communities who are often invisible of 2SLGBTQ+ youth (29 and in mainstream/dominant narratives under) in Ontario. Almost 1,200 of 2SLGBTQ+ communities, five youth participated through an smaller Snapshots have also been online survey and community created to highlight: Indigenous sharing circles between July- youth; racialized youth; trans, September, 2019. nonbinary and gender diverse The research results are powerful youth; northern youth; and youth and speak to the immediate and under 18. future needs of our communities, Access long form and snapshot while also amplifying the resilience reports at youthline.ca of 2SLGBTQ+ youth. 2SLGBTQ+ youth in Ontario are demanding change and a call to action to all those in positions of power, including politicians and social service providers. nearly 48% 1,200 2SLGBTQ+ youth participated in % the needs assessment 31% 32 18% Racialized Trans+ % (Black, (Trans, 15% 15 From Indigenous and/
  • Tennesseearchaeology

    Tennesseearchaeology

    TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Volume 7 Winter 2015 Number 2 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Tennessee Division of Archaeology Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 7 Winter 2015 NUMBER 2 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 103 EDITORS CORNER Paul Avery Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. ARTICLES Jared Barrett 110 ‘No Terms But Unconditional Surrender’: TRC Inc. Archaeological and Geophysical Andrew Brown Assessment of the Fort Donelson University of North Texas Confederate Monument Landscape, Stewart County, Tennessee Aaron Deter-Wolf SHAWN M. PATCH, CHRISTOPHER T. ESPENSHADE, Tennessee Division of Archaeology SARAH LOWRY, AND PATRICK SEVERTS Phillip Hodge 141 Thomas M.N. Lewis: The Making of a New Tennessee Department of Transportation Deal-Era Tennessee Valley Archaeologist Shannon Hodge MARLIN F. HAWLEY AND DAVID H. DYE Middle Tennessee State University AVOCATIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS Kandi Hollenbach University of Tennessee 180 Qualls Cave (40RB2): A Multi-Component Sarah Levithol Site Overlooking the Red River, Robertson Tennessee Division of Archaeology County, Tennessee JOHN T. DOWD Ryan Parish University of Memphis Tanya M. Peres Middle Tennessee State University Jesse Tune Texas A&M University Tennessee Archaeology is published semi-annually in electronic print format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology. Correspondence about manuscripts for the journal should be addressed to Michael C. Moore, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Cole Building #3, 1216 Foster Avenue, Nashville TN 37243. The Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology disclaims responsibility for statements, whether fact or of opinion, made by contributors. On the Cover: Thomas M.N. Lewis with a “sword” from the Duck River Cache (Courtesy and by permission of Nancy Ladd, Lewis’ daughter, via Marlin Hawley and David Dye).