East Asia Wrestles with Questions of Trust and Democracy 98 106

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

East Asia Wrestles with Questions of Trust and Democracy 98 106 GLOBAL ASIA In Focus GLOBAL ASIA Vol. 10, No. 3, FALL 2015 98 106 112 Yun-han Chu, Yu-tzung Chang, Yun-han Chu, Hsin-hsin Pan Mark Weatherall Min-hua Huang & Wen-chin Wu & Jack Wu & Jie Lu Why authoritarian or Why are levels of Perceptions in non-democratic trust in political East Asia of China’s governments enjoy institutions in Asia’s rise and how this In Focus more popularity than democracies on will influence democratic states. the decline? US thinking. Asian Baromet er SurveyEast Asia Wrestles With Questions of Trust and Democracy 96 97 GLOBAL ASIA In Focus Asian Barometer Survey GLOBAL ASIA Vol. 10, No. 3, FALL 2015 1 Tabassum Zakaria, “US Intelligence Sees Asia’s Global Power Rising surveys from 2014 to 2016. By the end of July 2015, seven were Enter the Dragon: by 2030,” Reuters, Dec. 10, 2012: www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/10/ completed: Mongolia, Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore, us-usa-intelligence-idUSBRE8B90HY20121210 [retrieved Aug. 13, 2015] Malaysia and Myanmar. The remaining six are Japan, Hong Kong, 2 Yan Xuetong. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. South Korea, China, Vietnam and Cambodia. Myanmar is the only Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press (2011). newly added country in wave four. See the previous three waves of How East Asians ABS data at the official website at www.asianbarometer.org/. 3 The Asian Barometer Survey’s fourth wave includes 14 country View a Rising China By Yun-han Chu, Min-hua Huang quickly emerged that called for China to prepare China has managed to become a responsible great power and argued & Jie Lu that its power competition with the US is inevita- to hold up its largely ble.2 However, those voices remained in the aca- positive image in the demic community and did not significantly affect eyes of East Asians. The China’s foreign policy until Xi completely took Barometer Survey Barometer In Focus: The Asian Barometer Survey OVER the past decade, China’s increasing eco- over political and military power in March 2013. negative effect of its has captured a vast range of nomic power, military strength and political Since then, China has revealed its ambition to act more assertive approach influence have been widely acknowledged in like a rising power by displaying its military capa- views held by East Asians on a the world, particularly in East Asia. Significant bility to the world (commissioning its first aircraft to territorial disputes has number of subjects, but perhaps changes in China’s foreign policies, shifting from carrier, the Liaoning), constructing a new inter- Asian been perhaps neutralized none has undergone such Deng Xiaoping’s principle of “concealing our abil- national financial regime through such institu- by the anticipated sharp and complex changes ity and biding our time” to Xi Jingping’s most tions as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank recent proclamation of a “new pattern of relation- (AIIB), initiating global development strategies economic benefits that as perceptions in East Asia of ship between great powers,” have shown that Bei- such as the “One Belt, One Road” initiative, and could be brought about China’s rise and how this will jing is now vigorously seeking to engage in inter- showing its toughness in the territorial disputes in influence the position of the US. national affairs, aiming to pursue China’s national the East China Sea and South China Sea. by Beijing’s ambitious interests around the world. China’s East Asian Has China’s changing policy in world political grand strategy of the Yun-han Chu, Min-hua Huang neighbors, in view of the high stakes involved affairs altered how East Asians view China’s rise? One Belt, One Road and Jie Lu explore the evolving in their inescapable geographical, economic and Do East Asians welcome or fear China’s growing assessments across the region political connections with China, are keenly influence? Which model (Chinese versus Ameri- initiative. aware of the vigor and assertiveness associated can) do they prefer for future development? All to China’s emergence onto with these foreign policy changes. The question of these questions are crucial to understanding the global stage. of how East Asians view a rising China, therefore, how East Asians view a rising China, particularly does not just make eye-catching news headlines, whether East Asians may perceive China differ- it also has serious implications for international ently as its pursues multipronged foreign policies. relations in East Asia and the world today. In fact, the power transition from Hu Jintao to Xi Nonetheless, the change in China’s foreign pol- provides a great opportunity to examine all of the icy was not a sudden event, but rather an incre- above questions. And fortunately, the latest two mental process starting from the 2008 global waves of the Asian Barometer Survey (ABS), wave financial crisis, caused by the SU subprime mort- three and four, have collected some pertinent and gage crisis, and further accelerated in 2012 when valuable information in two critical moments Xi rose to power as the country’s top leader. Chi- associated with the transition, that is, the late na’s strong economy and robust performance dur- period of Hu’s era and early period of Xi’s era. ing the global financial crisis gave Chinese policy- makers a clear vision that the power gap between PeRcePTIONS OF CHINA’S RISE China and the US has rapidly narrowed. And if In both the ABS3 (2010-2012) and ABS4 (2014- this trend continues, China can expect to catch up now) surveys, there is the same battery of ques- in economic power no later than 2030.1 A school tions employed to measure how people think of of thought, led by prominent Chinese schol- the rise of China and related issues.3 The first ars such as Yan Xuetong at Tsinghua University, question is about perceived influence: “Which 112 113 GLOBAL ASIA In Focus Asian Barometer Survey GLOBAL ASIA Vol. 10, No. 3, FALL 2015 FIGURE 1 WHICH COUNTRY HAS THE MOST InfLUence IN ASIA? FIGURE 2 In Ten YeARS, WHICH COUNTRY WILL HAve THE MOST InfLUence IN ASIA? Source: Asian Barometer Survey Waves 3 (2010-2012) and 4 (2014-2016) Source: Asian Barometer Survey Waves 3 (2010-2012) and 4 (2014-2016) 100 100 China United States China United States % % 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 Barometer Survey Barometer In Focus: 0 0 Japan 2011 China 2011 China 2011 Japan 2011 Taiwan 2010 Taiwan 2014 Taiwan 2010Taiwan 2014 Asian Vietnam 2010 Thailand 2014 Thailand 2010Malaysia 2011 Vietnam 2010 Thailand 2010 Thailand 2014Malaysia 2011 Mongolia 2010Mongolia 2015 Myanmar 2015 Malaysia 2014 Indonesia 2011 Mongolia 2015Mongolia 2010 Myanmar 2015 Malaysia 2014 Indonesia 2011 Hong Kong 2012 Singapore 2010 Singapore 2015 Cambodia 2012 Philippines 2014Philippines 2010 Hong Kong 2012 Singapore 2010 Singapore 2015 Cambodia 2012 Philippines 2014Philippines 2010 South Korea 2011 South Korea 2011 country has the most influence in Asia?” Related to the Obama administration’s “pivot to Asia” pol- promoted during his second term. Under this pol- To detect Asian people’s long-term expectation results are presented in Figure 1 by a descend- icy. The only exception is Thailand, where more icy, the US government has reinforced its politi- about the region’s power reconfiguration, Asian ing order of the percentage of respondents who people picked the US (44 percent) over China (42 cal and security commitments to the region and Barometer also included a follow-up question: chose China. Overall, China’s growing power percent) in 2010, but the result was dramatically offered its Asian allies a credible hedging option “In 10 years, which country will have the most and influence in the region are widely acknowl- reversed four years later. In 2014, only 19 percent in the face of a rising and more assertive China. influence in Asia?” The results are illustrated in edged by East Asians. Specifically, there are three of Thai respondents still considered the US as the This renewed commitment enhanced its popu- Figure 2, showing an even stronger expectation important patterns. First, in countries that are most influential while 49 percent chose China. larity and even elevated its standing in the eyes of about China’s overtaking the US in this regard. territorially adjacent or culturally close to China, It is fairly understandable that China’s neigh- many Asian people. Thailand defied this regional While the same conclusion holds that East Asians the majority of their people believe China, rather boring countries (including Singapore in the cul- trend probably because the US has downgraded perceived stronger Chinese influence thanS outh- than the US, has the most influence inA sia (from tural sense) are all intensively exposed to Chi- its political and security support as a result of east Asians, the percentage of people who believe 71 percent in Hong Kong 2012 to 53 percent in na’s growing power in multiple dimensions, par- the 2014 military coup, which toppled demo- China will have the most influence in the future Singapore in 2015). Second, however, in South- ticularly in the economic and security domains. cratically elected Prime Minister Yingluck Shi- significantly increased, by more than 10 percent- east Asian countries that do not share borders However, even for those Southeast Asian coun- nawatra. In contrast, China reinforced its diplo- age points in many cases. For example, the per- with China, more people believe that the US has tries that are territorially non-adjacent, they also matic and economic support after the coup and centage increased from 71 percent to 89 percent the most influence (from 46 percent in Malaysia have very close and multi-faceted economic and became Thailand’s most reliable strategic part- in Hong Kong in 2012, from 56 percent to 83 per- in 2014 to 65 percent in the Philippines in 2010).
Recommended publications
  • Mongolia. Competitiveness Assessment Of
    OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series: No. 39 Jointly Published By
    A Comparative Survey of DEMOCRACY, GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Working Paper Series: No. 39 Jointly Published by Traditionalism, Political Learning and Conceptions of Democracy in East Asia Yu-tzung Chang National Taiwan University Yun-han Chu Academia Sinica Issued by Asian Barometer Project Office National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica 2007 Taipei Asian Barometer A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series Jointly Published by Globalbarometer The Asian Barometer (ABS) is an applied research program on public opinion on political values, democracy, and governance around the region. The regional network encompasses research teams from twelve East Asian political systems (Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Singapore, and Indonesia), and five South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal). Together, this regional survey network covers virtually all major political systems in the region, systems that have experienced different trajectories of regime evolution and are currently at different stages of political transition. The ABS Working Paper Series is intended to make research result within the ABS network available to the academic community and other interested readers in preliminary form to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Scholars in the ABS network also devote their work to the Series with the hope that a timely dissemination of the findings of their surveys to the general public as well as the policy makers would help illuminate the public discourse on democratic reform and good governance. The topics covered in the Series range from country-specific assessment of values change and democratic development, region-wide comparative analysis of citizen participation, popular orientation toward democracy and evaluation of quality of governance, and discussion of survey methodology and data analysis strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Barometer, Professor at National Taiwan University
    WAPOR-GBS Joint Webinar Pandemic, Governance, and Comparative Public Opinion Research Min-hua Huang (Taiwan) Co-Principal Investigator at Asian Barometer, Professor at National Taiwan University #AsianBarometer #GlobalBarometerSurvey @WAPOR The Changed and Unchanged of Public Perception Under the Covid Pandemic The 2020 Singaporean Case Min-Hua Huang National Taiwan University Covid-19 cases in the region Confirmed cases Cases per million Project timeline Cases reported on November 17, 2020 from CSSE, Johns Hopkins University Asian Barometer Survey Schedule (3rd-5th Wave) Code Country Wave 3 Wave 4 Wave 5 Period Sample Size Period Sample Size Period Sample Size 1 Japan 2011.12 1880 2015.1-2 1000 2019.7-10 1045 2 Hong Kong 2012.9 1207 2016.2-3 1000 Ongoing 3 Korea 2011.5 1207 2015.10-12 1200 2019.5-7 1268 4 China 2011.7-10 3473 2015.7-2016.2 4217 2019.7-12 4941 5 Mongolia 2010.4-5 1210 2014.6-9 1228 2018.7-8 1284 6 the Philippines 2010.3 1200 2014.7 1200 2018.12 1200 7 Taiwan 2010.1-2 1592 2014.6-10 1657 2018.7-2019.1 1259 8 Thailand 2010.8-12 1512 2014.8-10 1200 2018.12-2019.2 1200 9 Indonesia 2011.5 1550 2016.1 1550 2019.7 1540 10 Singapore 2010.4-8 1000 2014.10.-12 1039 2020.7-9 1002 11 Vietnam 2010.9-10 1191 2015.9-10 1200 2018.6-7 1200 12 Cambodia 2012.2-3 1200 2015.10-11 1200 Ongoing 13 Malaysia 2011.10-11 1214 2014.9-11 1207 2019.4-5 1237 14 Myanmar 2015.1-3 1620 2019.9-10 1627 15 Australia 2018.10-2019.1 1630 18 India 2019.11 5318 4 Case Number and Death of COVID in Singapore 70000 30 28 60000 25 58135 50000 20 40000 15 30000 10 20000 10000 5 0 0 # of cases # of deaths Economic Impact Economic Evaluation Economic Growth Rate in Singapore since 2000 (Percent) Wave 3 Wave 4 Wave 5 16 14.5 12 9.8 9.0 9.0 9.0 7.4 8 6.3 4.8 3.9 4.5 4.5 3.9 4.3 3.0 3.2 3.4 4 1.9 0.1 0.7 0 -1.1 -4 -6.9 est.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innovation Imperative for Developing East Asia
    The Innovation Imperative for Developing East Asia The Innovation Imperative for Developing East Asia The Innovation Imperative fter a half century of transformative economic progress that moved hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, countries in developing for Developing East Asia AEast Asia are facing an array of challenges to their future development. Slowed productivity growth, increased fragility of the global trading system, and rapid changes in technology are all threatening export-oriented, labor- intensive manufacturing—the region’s engine of growth. Significant global challenges—such as climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic—are exacerbating economic vulnerability. These developments raise questions about whether the region’s past model of development can continue to deliver rapid growth and poverty reduction. Against this background, The Innovation Imperative in Developing East Asia aims to deepen understanding of the role of innovation in future development. The report examines the state of innovation in the region and analyzes the main constraints that firms and countries face to innovating. It assesses current policies and institutions, and lays out an agenda for action to spur more innovation-led growth. A key finding of the report is that countries’ current innovation policies are not aligned with their capabilities and needs. Policies need to strengthen the capacity of firms to innovate and support technological diffusion rather than just invention. Xavier Cirera Policy makers also need to eliminate policy biases against innovation in services, Andrew D. Mason a sector that is growing in economic importance. Moreover, countries need to strengthen key complementary factors for innovation, including firms’ managerial Francesca de Nicola quality, workers’ skills, and finance for innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four Asian Dragon's Significance in World Economic Development
    Bhatia Nikhil, Gupta Ishan, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology. ISSN: 2454-132X Impact factor: 4.295 (Volume 4, Issue 1) Available online at www.ijariit.com The Four Asian Dragon's Significance in World Economic Development Nikhil Bhatia Ishan Gupta [email protected] [email protected] Christ University, Bangalore, Karnataka Christ University, Bangalore, Karnataka ABSTRACT This paper analyses the contribution of four Asian Dragons towards International Economic System from 1965-2017 and reveals insight into related trends and patterns. The paper shows how four Asian dragons (Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, and Hong Kong) have grown since Independence to Industrialisation. Lastly, reasons for their slowing growth. This study is divided into four parts. Firstly, the growth pattern of GDP and Exports in these countries. Secondly, factors leading to this growth. Thirdly, how Industrialisation of four dragons helped world economy during currency fluctuations and recession. Fourthly, reasons for declining growth of these nations. The study discusses the challenges facing four Dragon’s sharply declining growth rate and proposes policy approaches that might help boost the country’s growth in the future. Keywords: Asian Dragon, International Economic System, GDP. 1. INTRODUCTION Four Asian Dragons The countries that come under are Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan, they had gone through rapid industrialisation and had high growth rate i.e. more than 7 percent a year between the 1960s and 1990s. By the 21st century, all the countries had developed into an advanced and high-income nation, industrialised and developed countries specialising in the areas of competitive advantage.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do East and Southeast Asian Cities Differ from Western Cities? a Systematic Review of the Urban Form Characteristics
    sustainability Article How do East and Southeast Asian Cities Differ from Western Cities? A Systematic Review of the Urban Form Characteristics Tzu-Ling Chen 1,*, Hao-Wei Chiu 2,3 and Yu-Fang Lin 4 1 Department of Urban Development, University of Taipei, Taipei 11153, Taiwan 2 Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University, New Taipei 23741, Taiwan 4 Department of Landscape Architecture, National Chiayi University, Chiayi 60004, Taiwan; v.yfl[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-02-2871-8288 (ext. 3110) Received: 11 February 2020; Accepted: 17 March 2020; Published: 19 March 2020 Abstract: The Fifth Assessment Report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5) revealed that the scale of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Asian cities is similar to those from developed economies, which are driven predominantly by economic growth. Due to variations in geographic and climatic contexts, culture and religion, living style and travel behavior, governance and institutions, and a wide range of density and land use mixes, there are significant variations in urban form patterns across Western and Asian cities. This paper uses a systematic review, which is a critical interpretive synthesis methodology, to review keywords of studies related to urban form among East and Southeast Asian cities. From 3725 records identified through database searching, 213 studies were included in qualitative analysis. The results show that, although the population density in built-up areas is higher, annual population density is declining significantly in East and Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series: No. 85
    A Comparative Survey of DEMOCRACY, GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Working Paper Series: No. 85 Jointly Published by The Stagnated Development of Liberal Democratic Values Yu-Tzung Chang Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] & Yun-Han Chu Distinguished Research Fellow, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] Asian Barometer A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series Jointly Published by Globalbarometer The Asian Barometer (ABS) is an applied research program on public opinion on political values, democracy, and governance around the region. The regional network encompasses research teams from thirteen East Asian political systems (Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia), and five South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal). Together, this regional survey network covers virtually all major political systems in the region, systems that have experienced different trajectories of regime evolution and are currently at different stages of political transition. The ABS Working Paper Series is intended to make research result within the ABS network available to the academic community and other interested readers in preliminary form to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Scholars
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series: No. 79
    A Comparative Survey of DEMOCRACY, GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Working Paper Series: No. 79 Jointly Published by The Youth’s Trust in Institutions Jack Chen-chia Wu Political Science, National Taiwan University Yutzung Chang Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] Mark Weatherall Political Science, National Taiwan University Asian Barometer A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series Jointly Published by Globalbarometer The Asian Barometer (ABS) is an applied research program on public opinion on political values, democracy, and governance around the region. The regional network encompasses research teams from thirteen East Asian political systems (Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia), and five South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal). Together, this regional survey network covers virtually all major political systems in the region, systems that have experienced different trajectories of regime evolution and are currently at different stages of political transition. The ABS Working Paper Series is intended to make research result within the ABS network available to the academic community and other interested readers in preliminary form to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Scholars in the ABS network also devote their work to the Series with the hope that a timely dissemination of the findings of their surveys to the general public as well as the policy makers would help illuminate the public discourse on democratic reform and good governance. The topics covered in the Series range from country-specific assessment of values change and democratic development, region-wide comparative analysis of citizen participation, popular orientation toward democracy and evaluation of quality of governance, and discussion of survey methodology and data analysis strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Asian Tigers (Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea)
    Four Asian Tigers (Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea) Linda Phanová, Petr Havel Agenda • The global population • The global area • The global GDP • The global exports • The global imports • The global FDI • The global debt • The global CO2 production Case studies: • The Development of the Four Asian Tigers • The role of Education • Labour market rigidity Global population (2018) Hong Kong 7 524 100 Singapore 5 703 600 South Korea 51 811 167 Taiwan 23 603 121 The global area (km²) Hong Kong 1 106 Singapore 728 South Korea 100 210 Taiwan 36 197 The global GDP in $ (2020) Hong Kong 340 billion Singapore 340 billion South Korea 1,59 trilion Taiwan 660 billion The global exports in billions of $ (2017) Hong Kong 496,9 Singapore 372,9 South Korea 577,4 Taiwan 344,6 The global imports in billions of $ (2017) Hong Kong 558,6 Singapore 327,4 South Korea 457,5 Taiwan 272,6 The global foreign direct investment inflows in $ Hong Kong 68,4 billion (2019) Singapore 92 billion (2019) South Korea 10,5 billion (2019) Taiwan 8 billion (2019 The global debt in $ (2020) Hong Kong 1 002 million (2019) Singapore 458,13 billion (2020) South Korea 720,73 billion (2019) Taiwan 200 103 million (2019) The global CO2 production in tons (2016) Hong Kong 47 066 386 Singapore 48 381 759 South Korea 604 043 830 Taiwan 276 724 868 Development ● Affection of natural resources and geography for economic growth: ○ natural resource ○ proximity to the sea ○ people living in the coastal area ○ location in the tropics ● Demographic point of view: ○ Growth rate of the working age population ○ Life expectancy at birth Education ● Human capital= factor for measuring productivity of a country ○ more educated and skilled workforce = production of more output ● Primary school in 1965: ○ South Korea, Taiwan: basic level of education ○ Hong Kong: private schools with intervention of government ○ decrease of discrepancies in gender literacy rates Source: Excel, Barro and Lee Dataset Labour market rigidity ● Rises in labor market rigidity are negatively correlated with output and economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • ADB Annual Report 2016
    50 YEARS OF ADB: IMPROVING LIVES FOR A BETTER FUTURE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 2016 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 8 16 36 42 2 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 6 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 1 8 Improving Lives for a Better Future CHAPTER 2 16 Central and West Asia 20 East Asia 24 Pacific 28 South Asia 32 Southeast Asia CHAPTER 3 36 Developing the Private Sector CHAPTER 4 42 Delivering an Effective Organization SPECIAL APPENDIX 49 Impact of the ADF–OCR Merger and ADB’s Financial Statements ANNUAL REPORT 2016 USB CONTENTS FINANCIAL REPORT OPERATIONAL DATA ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION ADB MEMBER FACT SHEETS Population . B 2015 We connected . B 3 million 1966 new households to electricity (2010–2016) GDP per capita A CHANGING , TOGETHER We provided 2015 REGION 8.4 million WE DELIVER households with Since ADB’s founding in 1966, Asia 1966 new and improved has transformed from the world’s Asia has changed a lot in the past water supplies poorest region to a dynamic center 50 years. So has ADB. We have (2010–2016) of global growth and home to more evolved to meet the changing than half the world’s people. demands of the region, to ensure Poverty (less than $1.90 a day) we continue to produce results that improve people’s lives. B 1990 We built and upgraded . B 92,000 2015 kilometers of roads (2010–2016) ASSISTANCE IN PRC’s Shanghai’s Pudong area A BANK FOR booms after the opening of ADVERSITY ADB-supported $267 million HALF THE In the midst of the 1997-1998 Shanghai Yangpu Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 10 Influence of Social Capital on Political
    A Comparative Survey of DEMOCRACY, GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Working Paper Series: No. 10 Influence of Social Capital on Political Participation in Asian Cultural Context Ken’ich Ikeda Yasuo Yamada University of Tokyo Masaru Kohno Waseda University Issued by Asian Barometer Project Office National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica 2003 Taipei Asian Barometer A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series The Asian Barometer (ABS) is an applied research program on public opinion on political values, democracy, and governance around the region. The regional network encompasses research teams from twelve East Asian political systems (Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Singapore, and Indonesia), and five South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal). Together, this regional survey network covers virtually all major political systems in the region, systems that have experienced different trajectories of regime evolution and are currently at different stages of political transition. The ABS Working Paper Series is intended to make research result within the ABS network available to the academic community and other interested readers in preliminary form to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Scholars in the ABS network also devote their work to the Series with the hope that a timely dissemination of the findings of their surveys to the general public as well as the policy makers would help illuminate the public discourse on democratic reform and good governance. The topics covered in the Series range from country-specific assessment of values change and democratic development, region-wide comparative analysis of citizen participation, popular orientation toward democracy and evaluation of quality of governance, and discussion of survey methodology and data analysis strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series: No. 92
    A Comparative Survey of DEMOCRACY, GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Working Paper Series: No. 92 Jointly Published by Institutional Trust in East Asia Zheng-Xu Wang Associate Professor, School of Contemporary Chinese Studies, University of Nottingham, UK [email protected] Asian Barometer A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series Jointly Published by Globalbarometer The Asian Barometer (ABS) is an applied research program on public opinion on political values, democracy, and governance around the region. The regional network encompasses research teams from thirteen East Asian political systems (Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia), and five South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal). Together, this regional survey network covers virtually all major political systems in the region, systems that have experienced different trajectories of regime evolution and are currently at different stages of political transition. The ABS Working Paper Series is intended to make research result within the ABS network available to the academic community and other interested readers in preliminary form to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Scholars in the ABS network also devote their work to the Series with the hope that a timely dissemination of the findings of their surveys to the general public as well as the policy makers would help illuminate the public discourse on democratic reform and good governance. The topics covered in the Series range from country-specific assessment of values change and democratic development, region-wide comparative analysis of citizen participation, popular orientation toward democracy and evaluation of quality of governance, and discussion of survey methodology and data analysis strategies.
    [Show full text]