DOCSLIB.ORG

YUB Community Session - March 31 , 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
YUB Community Session - March 31 , 2014 1 1 YUKON UTILITIES BOARD 2 3 4 5 6 YUKON ENERGY CORPORATION 7 WHITEHORSE DIESEL TO LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS 8 CONVERSION PROJECT (LNG PROJECT) 9 10 11 12 13 14 ___________________________________________________________ 15 16 COMMUNITY SESSION 17 18 ___________________________________________________________ 19 20 21 22 March 31, 2014 23 Whitehorse, Yukon 24 25 2 1 Proceedings taken at the Westmark Whitehorse Hotel & 2 Conference Center, 201 Wood Street, Whitehorse, Yukon. 3 ___________________________________________________________ 4 March 31, 2014 5 6 Mr. B. McLennan Chair 7 Mr. R. Laking Vice-chair Mr. N. Prasad Board Member 8 Mr. A. Fortin Board Member Mr. R. (Les) Boisvert Board Member 9 Ms. G. Bentivegna Board Counsel 10 Ms. D. Lemke Executive Secretary, Yukon Utilities Board 11 Ms. C. Henry Hearing Officer Mr. D. Ward Board Staff 12 Mr. B. Clarke Board Staff 13 Ms. A. Jones, CSR(A) Official Court Reporter Ms. D. Gerbrandt, CSR(A) Official Court Reporter 14 Gordon Gilgan 15 Skeeter Wright Sally Wright 16 Rob Lewis Aubin Tuzlak 17 Heather Ashthorn Werner Rhein 18 Theo Stad Lois Johnston 19 Maryanne Lewis Jennifer Line 20 Mary Amerongen Cam Kos 21 Ken de la Barre Jacqueline Vigneaux 22 Gary Bemis Colleen James 23 Bob Jickling 24 ____________________________________________________________ 25 3 1 THE CHAIR: I'm going to call this 2 community meeting to order. My name is Bruce McLennan, and 3 I'm chair of the Yukon Utilities Board, and I would like to 4 introduce the Board members sitting on the Panel. 5 To my left are fellow Board members 6 Naresh Prasad; Bob Laking, who is the vice-chair; and to my 7 right are Les Boisvert and Andre Fortin. So on behalf of my 8 colleagues I would like to make a very brief opening 9 statement. 10 This morning we began the public hearing phase 11 of the Yukon Energy Corporation's (YEC) application for an 12 energy project certificate and an energy operations 13 certificate for the Whitehorse Diesel to Liquified Natural 14 Gas Conversion Project, also known as the LNG Project. 15 These certificates are applied for under 16 Part 3 of the Public Utilities Act and have been referred to 17 the Yukon Utilities Board to review and hearing in accordance 18 with the terms of reference presented by the Minister of 19 Justice in his letter of December 18th, 2013. 20 At the end of the hearing, the Board is to 21 provide a recommendation to the Minister on whether the 22 energy project and energy operations certificates should be 23 granted for the LNG Projects, whether the certificates should 24 be subject to any terms and conditions, and it is also to 25 make any other recommendations or provide any other 4 1 information that it considers advisable in the circumstances. 2 This evening's community session will allow 3 individuals who are not registered parties to present 4 information that may inform the registered parties and the 5 Board of issues that may not have been considered in their 6 formal submission. Your comments will be transcribed, and 7 the transcripts will become public documents. These 8 transcripts will be posted on the Yukon Public Utilities 9 website. What we hear tonight will be taken into 10 consideration in making our recommendation to the minister. 11 As outlined in the community session 12 guidelines that were prepared and distributed prior to the 13 hearing and are available at the registration desk, your oral 14 statement should be related to the Minister's terms of 15 reference of the matter before the Board which may be found 16 on the Board's website. 17 More particularly, they should address: (a) 18 the public need for the project under reasonable electrical 19 load forecasts; (b) the capability of currently available 20 generation facilities to meet forecast load requirements; (c) 21 the risks facing the project and their effect on customer 22 rates; (d) any alternatives to the project, given reasonable 23 load and risk assessments; and finally (e), whether it is 24 prudent to build the LNG Project at this time. 25 The community session guidelines outline the 5 1 rules for the presenters. You should refer to those 2 guidelines, but I would like to remind you of a few of the 3 more important rules. 4 Presenters will be called in the order they 5 have registered. And Ms. Bentivegna, who is Board counsel, 6 will do the calling of the registrants. Please start your 7 presentation by stating your name. 8 Registered presenters will have up to ten 9 minutes to make their statements. You will be advised after 10 about nine minutes that you have one minute left to complete 11 your presentation. No visual aids are permitted. 12 If a Yukon Utilities Board member requires 13 clarification regarding a presentation, they will wait and 14 ask for that clarification at the end of your presentation. 15 There will be no questions taken from the 16 floor. The applicant and other registered parties who might 17 be observing this community session will neither take or ask 18 questions, nor will they provide comment at tonight's 19 session. If they wish to address points raised this evening, 20 they will be able to do so in the formal hearing, which 21 reconvenes tomorrow. If they do so, those matters will 22 appear in the transcripts. 23 This session will conclude at 10 p.m. at the 24 latest. If anyone is speaking at that time, they will be 25 allowed to complete his or her statement. 6 1 There are to be no comments from the floor 2 during an individual's presentation. 3 If you don't want to make an oral statement, 4 you can still make a written submission, but it must be 5 received by midnight tonight. 6 We will take a break in between. I had 7 planned to take a break at about 8:20, 8:30 for 15 minutes, 8 but there is an interpreter, who we didn't realize was going 9 to be here tonight, and she has asked if we could take a 10 five-minute break after every hour. So I will try to 11 accommodate that. So we will take a break at 8, 9; and she 12 should be fine until the end of the session. 13 If you have a cellphone, I would ask you to 14 turn it off or place it on mute. 15 And with that I would ask the first registered 16 presenter to approach the microphone and make the statement. 17 And you can use the microphone or you can make your 18 presentation from that table. 19 So I'll get Ms. Bentivegna to call the first 20 speaker. 21 MS. BENTIVEGNA: Mr. Gordon Gilgan. 22 MR. GILGAN: Good evening. My name is 23 Gordon Gilgan. I'm a resident of Whitehorse, Yukon. 24 Firstly, let me thank you for the opportunity 25 to address you on the matter of the Yukon Energy Corporation 7 1 proposal to purchase two liquid natural gas generators to 2 replace two diesel generators that the Yukon Energy 3 Corporation has decided has completed their useful life. 4 By way of introduction, I've lived in the 5 Yukon for 13 years. I'm retired from regular employment, but 6 I still work as a consultant. I'm a biologist. I have two 7 degrees in science and a doctorate in higher education. 8 I'm appearing before you tonight because I am 9 an energy consumer and I'm a shareholder in Yukon Energy 10 Corporation. 11 I am concerned about their proposal to 12 introduce liquid natural gas into the fossil fuel energy 13 mixture of the Yukon. I recognize that the Yukon Utilities 14 Board is one of the checks and balances to ensure that public 15 utilities such as Yukon Energy Corporation operates in my 16 best interest. 17 I'm concerned that the Yukon government is 18 prepared to borrow $39.2 million to enable Yukon Energy 19 Corporation to purchase these generators and the 20 infrastructure necessary to bring liquid natural gas into the 21 Yukon. 22 I was told by Yukon Energy Corporation in a 23 public meeting that this purchase and operation will reduce 24 emissions from the current generators based on analysis of 25 several consultants that the corporation presented as being 8 1 independent. 2 In a subsequent discussion with the 3 consultants, they admitted that if the corporation had used 4 current scientific information that was readily available to 5 them, they would not have made such a claim as they know it 6 is not the truth. 7 In spite of this admission, Yukon Energy 8 Corporation continues to claim that liquid natural gas is a 9 cleaner fuel than the diesel currently used for power 10 generation. 11 It's important to recognize that the 12 electrical generation we're talking about is for the backup 13 of the hydro generation capacity of Yukon Energy Corporation. 14 In the past year, according to Yukon Energy Corporation 15 website energy consumption calculated that I was looking at, 16 we used 425.7 gigawatt hours of electricity generated by 17 hydro and an additional 2.11 gigawatt hours generated by 18 back-up diesel. That is less than half of 1 percent of the 19 total electricity consumed that is generated by these backup 20 diesel generators. 21 You may think that this year that has just 22 passed is an outlier, but the information provided by the 23 corporation -- to the corporation by the InterGroup 24 consultant in March of 2011 indicated that diesel generated 25 2.7 gigawatt hours of electricity in 2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BEAR HEAD LNG CORPORATION and ) BEAR HEAD LNG (USA), LLC ) FE DOCKET NO
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF FOSSIL ENERGY _______________________________________ ) BEAR HEAD LNG CORPORATION and ) BEAR HEAD LNG (USA), LLC ) FE DOCKET NO. 15-33-LNG _______________________________________ ) OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING LONG-TERM, MULTI-CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION TO EXPORT U.S.-SOURCED NATURAL GAS BY PIPELINE TO CANADA FOR LIQUEFACTION AND RE-EXPORT IN THE FORM OF LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS TO NON-FREE TRADE AGREEMENT COUNTRIES DOE/FE ORDER NO. 3770 FEBRUARY 5, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 II. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................ 11 III. PUBLIC INTEREST STANDARD .................................................................................... 11 IV. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST .......................................................................................... 14 A. Description of Applicants ............................................................................................. 14 B. Liquefaction Project ...................................................................................................... 15 C. M&N Pipeline ............................................................................................................... 16 D. Procedural History ........................................................................................................ 18 E. Source of Natural Gas ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Liquids in North America: Overview and Outlook to 2035
    Study No. 130 July 2012 CANADIAN NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS IN ENERGY RESEARCH NORTH AMERICA: OVERVIEW INSTITUTE AND OUTLOOK TO 2035 Canadian Energy Research Institute | Relevant • Independent • Objective NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS IN NORTH AMERICA: OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK TO 2035 Natural Gas Liquids in North America: Overview and Outlook to 2035 Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2012 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazines and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute ISBN 1-927037-09-6 Author: Carlos A. Murillo Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge Rick Funk of Funk & Associates Inc. and Paul Kralovic of Kralovic Economics Inc.; as well as those involved in the production, reviewing, and editing of the material, including but not limited to Peter Howard and Megan Murphy. CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 150, 3512 – 33 Street NW Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A6 Canada www.ceri.ca July 2012 Printed in Canada Front cover photo courtesy of ATCO Midstream. Natural Gas Liquids in North America: Overview and Outlook to 2035 iii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. xi REPORT HIGHLIGHTS & SUMMARY ................................................................................ xiii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Natural Gas (Biomethane) Feedstock Potential in Canada
    Renewable Natural Gas (Biomethane) Feedstock Potential in Canada 2020 Renewable Natural Gas (Biomethane) Feedstock Potential in Canada FINAL REPORT March 2020 Authors: Jamie Stephen, PhD M. Jean Blair, MSc Liz Brennan, MSc Susan Wood-Bohm, PhD TorchLight Bioresources Inc. ǀ Ottawa Tel: +1-613-532-7079 ǀ Fax: +1-613-249-7487 ǀ Email: [email protected] www.torchlightbioresources.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Renewable natural gas (RNG), also known as biomethane, is a near-pure methane gas that can be blended with natural gas and used for building space heat/hot water, industrial process heat, electricity generation, and transportation. Although much higher cost than current (2020) natural gas prices, RNG can be produced to be cost competitive with diesel fuel. Its ease of integration within the existing natural gas infrastructure and lower carbon intensity than natural gas and diesel has led to significant interest in fuel switching to RNG for greenhouse gas emission reductions. Previous studies have estimated Canada’s RNG potential using top-down analyses of national and provincial livestock manure, urban waste, industrial waste, landfill gas, and crop residue resources. While these analyses have helped to justify establishment of a small but growing RNG industry in Canada, Natural Resources Canada sought to better understand the RNG feedstock potential at a more localized geographic scale. TorchLight Bioresources was contracted by Natural Resources Canada to complete an analysis of RNG resources at a regional level of detail. As RNG resource data are not available country-wide at a municipality scale, the Canada Census Division was selected as the discreet geographic unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Natural Gas Market Review
    Study No. 158 June 2016 CANADIAN ENERGY CANADIAN NATURAL GAS RESEARCH MARKET REVIEW INSTITUTE Canadian Energy Research Institute | Relevant • Independent • Objective CANADIAN NATURAL GAS MARKET REVIEW Canadian Natural Gas Market Review Authors: Laura Johnson Paul Kralovic* Dinara Millington Jon Rozhon ISBN 1-927037-42-3 Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2016 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazines and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute June 2016 Printed in Canada Front photo courtesy of: istockphoto.com Acknowledgements: The authors of this report would like to extend their thanks and sincere gratitude to all CERI staff involved in the production and editing of the material, including but not limited to Allan Fogwill and Megan Murphy. *Paul Kralovic is Director, Frontline Economics Inc. ABOUT THE CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The Canadian Energy Research Institute is an independent, not-for-profit research establishment created through a partnership of industry, academia, and government in 1975. Our mission is to provide relevant, independent, objective economic research in energy and environmental issues to benefit business, government, academia and the public. We strive to build bridges between scholarship and policy, combining the insights of scientific research, economic analysis, and practical experience. For more information about CERI, visit www.ceri.ca CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 150, 3512 – 33 Street NW Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A6 Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefied Natural Gas in North America: an Analysis of the United States’ Exportation Position in the Context of Its North American Free Trade Agreement Partners
    Undergraduate Review Volume 14 Special Issue: Canada and the United Article 9 States in the Age of Trump 2018 Liquefied aN tural Gas in North America: An Analysis of the United States’ Exportation Position in the Context of its North American Free Trade Agreement Partners Sean Cunningham Follow this and additional works at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/undergrad_rev Recommended Citation Cunningham, Sean (2019). Liquefied Natural Gas in North America: An Analysis of the United States’ Exportation Position in the Context of its North American Free Trade Agreement Partners. Undergraduate Review, 14, 45-57. Available at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/undergrad_rev/vol14/iss2/9 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Copyright © 2018 Sean Cunningham Liquefied Natural Gas in infrastructure and a fairly compliant regulation system. However, with continental, cross-border trading flows dictating the crux of LNG trade for the three North North America: An Analysis American partners, freezing each other out may result in severe harm to U.S. export markets. The North of the United States’ American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which has been in effect for more than 20 years, has come under Exportation Position in fire.1 A main trade policy of the Trump Administration has been to renegotiate the trilateral deal so that it better the Context of its North benefits Americans. For the past several months, the trade ministers from Canada, the United States and American Free Trade Mexico have sat down to draft a new agreement, but the United States has stated it will walk away from the table Agreement Partners if its demands are not met.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Hydrogen Tolerance of Key Power-To-Gas (P2G) Components and Systems in Canada: Final Report Yoo, Yeong; Glass, Nancy; Baker, Ryan
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Review of hydrogen tolerance of key Power-to-Gas (P2G) components and systems in Canada: final report Yoo, Yeong; Glass, Nancy; Baker, Ryan For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. https://doi.org/10.4224/23002611 NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=94a036f4-0e60-4433-add5-9479350f74de https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=94a036f4-0e60-4433-add5-9479350f74de Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information. Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Study 3 Electricity in Canada, Mexico and the United States
    Issue Study 3. Electricity in North America: Some Environmental Implications of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Table of Contents – Issue Study 3 Acronyms 263 Acknowledgements 265 I. Introduction 266 II. The Issue in Context: Environmental, Economic, Social and Geographic Conditions 272 A. The Environmental Context 272 1. Air 273 2. Water 275 3. Land 277 4. Biota 278 B. The Economic Context 279 C. The Social Context 281 D. The Geographic Context 282 III. The NAFTA Connection 288 A. NAFTA Rule Changes 288 B. NAFTA’s Institutions 290 C. Trade Flows 292 260 1. Trade in Electricity 292 a. United States–Canada 293 b. United States–Mexico 294 c. Canada–Mexico 295 2. Trade in Fuels 296 a. Natural Gas 296 b. Coal 298 3. Trade in Enery-Sector Equipment 301 D. Transborder Investment Flows 302 1. Mexico 303 2. Canada 305 3. United States 306 IV. Linkages to the Environment 308 A. Production, Management and Technology 308 1. New Generation Technologies 308 a. Impact of New Enabling Technologies 312 2. Trends in Energy Production 313 a. Coal 313 b. Natural Gas 314 c. Hydroelectricity 315 d. Nuclear 317 e. Renewable Energy 319 f. Cogeneration, Demand-Side Management (DSM) and other Energy-Efficiency Measures 323 B. Physical Infrastructure 329 1. Electricity 329 a. Generation 329 b. Transmission 330 2. Natural Gas 333 a. Canada 333 b. Mexico 334 c. United States 335 C. Social Organization 336 D. Government Policy 337 1. Electricity 338 a. Canada 338 able of Contents: Electricity in North America T b. United States 339 c.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Supply and Demand in Canada's Energy Future: Current Context And
    Second Quarter 2018 International Association for Energy Economics Oil Supply and Demand in Canada’s Energy Future: Current Context and Long Term Trends By Matthew Hansen, Chris Doleman and Abha Bhargava IntroductIon the authors are with Canada is a large global producer of oil, and a relatively large user of oil products on a per Canada’s national energy Board. Matthew capita or gross domestic product basis. Canadian crude oil production has increased signifi- Hansen is a technical cantly in recent years, inspired by technological change, investment, and high oil prices. This specialist, Chris Doleman increase exists in a context of growing global oil demand, and expectations for significant is a Market Analyst and growth in the near future. Abha Bhargava is the While Canadian oil production has increased, Canada has also taken steps to reduce its own Director. Dr. Bhargava may be reached at Abha. fossil fuel use, including oil products. This is reflected in various policies and regulations put [email protected] in place at various levels of government over the past decade. Like other developed nations, demand for oil products has been flat during this time period. What sets Canada apart is the See footnotes at end of text. relative importance of energy production to its economy, as well as the fact that producing energy accounts for a relatively large share of Canada’s own energy use (much of which is natural gas) and emissions. This dynamic makes Canada an interesting case study for the paradox of fast growing global oil de- mand in the near-term, and expectations that global oil demand will be reduced in the long-term.
    [Show full text]
  • I. INTRODUCTION Until 1971 the Pricing of Natural Gas in Canada Had Been a Relatively Uncomplicated Matter
    120 A(l,BERTALAW REVIEW [VOL. XVII NATURAL GAS PRICING IN CANADA MARVINV. McDILL* Setting out the historical developments which led to govemment contf'ol of natural gas pricing, this papef' reviews the current legislativP mechanisms and regulatory issues. It includes an examination of net-back pricing undef' the Petroleum Adminis­ tration Act and Alberta's Natural Gas Pricing Agreement Act. Issues raised in the Alberta Public Utaities Boanl.'s Cost of Service Inquiry at"e analyzed, along with the special position of Alberta Gas Trunk Line Com'P"ny. I. INTRODUCTION Until 1971 the pricing of natural gas in Canada had been a relatively uncomplicated matter. During the past eight years, and particularly the past five, many dramatic changes have taken place. These changes have been caused by social and economic events, and have resulted in increased involvement in the pricing process by both the provincial and federal governments. Government involvement has created a body of legislation and· regulations designed to meet current conditions and to regulate and control the price of natural gas. Because of the rapidity of the changes and the necessity of swift government action, much of the legislation was hurriedly drafted. Consequently, it was sometimes confusing and incomplete. The oil and gas industry is beginning to learn to live under these new rules and regulations, and the inevitable problem areas are beginning to surface. Recent hearings of the National Energy Board, the Alberta Public Utilities Board and the newly formed Alberta Petroleum Marketing Commission have served to underscore the problems. Undoubtedly, many of the difficulties will be resolved over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Deregulation: Review and Perspective
    1987] NATURAL GAS DEREGULATION 1 NATURALGAS DEREGULATION:REVIEW AND PERSPECTIVE ALLAN L. McLARTY AND DAVID A. HOLGATE* This paper presents a review of the development of the statutory framework for implementing natural gas regulation in Canada and the steps in the process of "deregulation,. f of/owed by a discussion of some of the major outstanding issues arising directly from the process of deregulation. Some of the issues discussed in the context of deregulation include the federal and Alberta surplus tests, the pressure on existing long­ term gas contracts being exerted by consumer provinces, the bypass option and Alberta gas removal permit procedures. I. INTRODUCTION The deregulation of natural gas pricing in Canada, for both the domestic and export markets, has been a popular topic for debate among lawyers for some time now. Initially, there was a flurry of discussion about why governments should get out of the gas pricing business. When the governments finally came to the same conclusion, there was a new flurry of discussion about how the deregulation process should occur. Now that the initiatives taken by the federal and provincial levels of government to deregulate gas pricing are in place, the new debate centres on the efficacy of the steps taken to move the natural gas industry towards a competitive and market-sensitive pricing regime untrammeled by restrictions on access to pipelines and markets. To deal with the extent to which gas price deregulation has occurred requires some understanding of how regulation of gas pricing was implemented, how the statutes and regulations dealing with gas pricing have changed over the years and what has happened to those statutes and regulations since 31 October 1985, the acknowledged deregulation date.
    [Show full text]
  • Demand Elasticity for Natural Gas in Western and Central Canada
    ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS IN WESTERN AND CENTRAL CANADA by Milad Shooshtari Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia April 2014 © Copyright by Milad Shooshtari, 2014 DEDICATION PAGE This thesis is dedicated to my parents and sister who are always there for me. ii Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... v ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED ..................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 3 DATA DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 15 CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian LNG Competitiveness
    December 2019 Canadian LNG Competitiveness Beyond LNG Canada, will the country overcome self-inflicted regulatory uncertainty and high projected capital costs to become a global player? OIES PAPER: NG 156 J. Peter Findlay, OIES Research Associate & Criterium Group The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2019 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-153-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671532 1 Preface In our analysis of the global LNG market it has been clear for some time that Canada has huge gas resources potentially available for export, especially since sales into the US have been curtailed by the rise of shale gas production south of the border. The key question has always been whether their development could be done in a cost-effective manner to allow Canadian LNG to compete with emerging supplies from the rest of the world. The recent decision by Shell and its partners to take a final investment decision on the LNG Canada project has underlined that they, at least, believe that the prospects are good in British Columbia, based on low upstream costs and the resolution of numerous midstream and regulatory issues.
    [Show full text]