DOCSLIB.ORG

Fisher's Green

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fisher's Green British Pipeline Agency Fisher’s Green Ecological Constraints Survey Report 856794 JANUARY 2017 RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No.: 856794 Title: Fisher’s Green – Ecological Constraints Survey Report – Rev 00 Client: British Pipeline Agency Date: January 2017 Office: Hemel Hempstead Status: Final Author Lindsay Stronge Technical reviewer Corin Simmonds Signature: Signature: Date: 03/01/2017 Date: 05/01/2017 Project manager Jessica Breeze Quality reviewer Corin Simmonds Signature: Signature: Date: 03/01/2017 Date: 05/01/2017 RSK Environment Ltd (RSK) has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by RSK for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. No part of this report may be copied or duplicated without the express permission of RSK and the party for whom it was prepared. Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the quality management system of RSK Environment Ltd. British Pipeline Agency Fisher’s Green – Ecological Constraints Survey Report 856794 – 1 (00) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This report presents the details of an ecological constraints survey carried out at Fisher’s Green, Cheshunt in a rural location in Essex. The purpose of the survey was to determine the ecological value of the land, and to assess its potential for protected animal species in an area where a pipeline crossing is being re-routed underground by the British Pipeline Agency (BPA). The survey was carried out on 7 December 2016 by Corin Simmonds, a principal ecologist and Lindsay Stronge, a graduate ecologist. 2. The proposed working areas comprise hard standing, ruderal vegetation, buildings, scrub, scattered trees, semi-improved grassland and arable. There are multiple waterways; Cornmill stream, the River Lea and Hooksmarsh lake in addition to fishery lakes adjacent to the working areas, 3. Habitats in the working areas are likely to contain only common and widespread plant species and no non-native invasive species were recorded. 4. There are six statutory designated sites and four Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) within 2 km. The proposed working areas fall within the impact zone of the Turnford & Cheshunt Pitts Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and therefore Natural England must be contacted to discuss the proposals. 5. No Badger (Meles meles) setts were found within the working area or 30 m from it but there was evidence of foraging badgers. 6. The site contains habitat suitable for foraging Badgers, Otters (Lutra lutra) and Hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). As a precautionary measure we suggest that any excavations made during the course of works are covered overnight. If excavations cannot be covered, a ramp should be left in place to allow any trapped animals to escape. 7. There are three records of Great Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus) within 1 km and numerous water bodies within 500 m. However, these water bodies are unlikely to be suitable for Great Crested Newt as they are lakes or form part of a commercial fishery. It is therefore highly unlikely that Great Crested Newt will be found on site. 8. There is one building on land between the two rivers that may be suitable for roosting bats. This area was inaccessible; but as the new pipeline route will go underground the building will not be affected. 9. There are lines of trees along the waterways and hedgerows. If any clearance of scrub and trees is necessary it should take place outside of the nesting bird season (March to August inclusive) or the vegetation should be checked by an ecologist no more than three days prior to the works. If any active nests are found these should be left until the young have fledged. 10. The waterways that run between the proposed working areas (the River Lea and Cornmill stream) are known to contain both Otter and Water Vole however at this location the bank sides are canalised using sheet piling, rendering them unsuitable for Water Vole burrows or Otter holts. Planned works involve microtunnelling beneath the river and we therefore conclude that neither species will be affected. British Pipeline Agency Fishers Green – Ecological Constraints Survey Report 856794 – 1 (00) CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Ecological Context .................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Structure of the Report ............................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Background Data Search ......................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Ecological Constraints Survey .................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Constraints ............................................................................................................................... 3 3 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Background Data Search ......................................................................................................... 4 3.1.1 Biodiversity Action Plans .............................................................................................. 4 3.1.2 Designated Sites .......................................................................................................... 4 3.1.3 Protected and Noteworthy Species .............................................................................. 7 3.2 Habitats .................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Working Area 1 ............................................................................................................. 9 3.2.2 Working Area 2 ............................................................................................................. 9 3.2.3 Working Area 3 ............................................................................................................. 9 3.3 Protected Species .................................................................................................................. 10 3.3.1 Badgers ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.3.2 Great Crested Newt .................................................................................................... 10 3.3.3 Otter and Water Vole .................................................................................................. 10 3.3.4 Bats ............................................................................................................................ 10 3.3.5 Reptiles ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.3.6 Hazel Dormice ............................................................................................................ 11 3.3.7 Nesting Birds .............................................................................................................. 11 3.3.8 Invertebrates ............................................................................................................... 11 3.3.9 West European Hedgehog ......................................................................................... 11 4 EVALUATION AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 12 4.1 Designated Sites .................................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Habitats and Plant Species .................................................................................................... 12 4.2.1 Habitats ...................................................................................................................... 12 4.2.2 Plant Species .............................................................................................................. 13 4.3 Protected Animals .................................................................................................................. 13 4.3.1 Badgers ...................................................................................................................... 13 4.3.2 Great Crested Newt .................................................................................................... 13 4.3.3 Otter and Water Vole .................................................................................................. 13 4.3.4 Bats ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition
    Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition AKA exotic, alien, non-native, introduced, non-indigenous, or foreign sp. National Invasive Species Council definition: (1) “a non-native (alien) to the ecosystem” (2) “a species likely to cause economic or harm to human health or environment” Not all invasive species are foreign origin (Spartina, bullfrog) Not all foreign species are invasive (Most US ag species are not native) Definition increasingly includes exotic diseases (West Nile virus, anthrax etc.) Can include genetically modified/ engineered and transgenic organisms Executive Order 13112 (1999) Directed Federal agencies to make IS a priority, and: “Identify any actions which could affect the status of invasive species; use their respective programs & authorities to prevent introductions; detect & respond rapidly to invasions; monitor populations restore native species & habitats in invaded ecosystems conduct research; and promote public education.” Not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that cause/promote IS intro/spread Political, Social, Habitat, Ecological, Environmental, Economic, Health, Trade & Commerce, & Climate Change Considerations Historical Perspective Native Americans – Early explorers – Plant explorers in Europe Pioneers moving across the US Food - Plants – Stored products – Crops – renegade seed Animals – Insects – ants, slugs Travelers – gardeners exchanging plants with friends Invasive Species… …can also be moved by • Household goods • Vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Learning Objective
    QUARANTINE SIGNIFICANT LEPIDOPTERA OF CONCERN TO THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES STEVEN PASSOA USDA/APHIS/PPQ 2007 1 LEPIDOPTERA GOALS . Learn techniques of specimen preparation and submission for CAPS Lepidoptera . Develop a list of Lepidoptera of regulatory concern to the southern USA . Learn to SCREEN samples for these species in the stage most likely to be seen by diagnostic labs using the MAJOR characters. Some species are only defined by a combination of features. In those cases, using the associated key and references listed is more accurate. Give examples from the major superfamilies . Distributions and hosts mentioned are the most likely pathways 2 DEVELOP A LIST . Criteria originally modified from biocontrol of weeds list in July 1991 memo, then modified by NEPSC committee . Now widely used in APHIS as mini-PRA . Survey methodology and taxonomic recognition added to economic criteria . Results are either threats (no pathway), CAPS targets (need to survey), or a dead survey (not practical to consider) 3 WHY LABS HATE TO IDENTIFY LEPIDOPTERA . Secret society of critical characters . Constant name changes . Characters hard to see, covered with scales, or both 4 EGGS . Two types . Do not kill important finds and sent urgent . Plan to rear them in a quarantine facility . Spodoptera and Lymantria (and others) cover the eggs with scales from the female’s body 5 LARVAE . Associate leaf miners with the mine and host . Mouthparts are the “genitalia” of the larval world . Fill vials so there is no air bubble when shipping . “Burp” rubber stoppers and parafilm screw top vials . Can kill and ship in vinegar . Put loose parts in small vials 6 PUPAE .
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Read, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-5130 (2017) Cinderella River: The evolving narrative of the River Lee. http://hydrocitizenship.com, London, pp. 1-163. [Book] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23299/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Forest Insect Invasions
    Biol Invasions (2017) 19:3141–3159 DOI 10.1007/s10530-017-1514-1 FOREST INVASION Ecology of forest insect invasions E. G. Brockerhoff . A. M. Liebhold Received: 13 March 2017 / Accepted: 14 July 2017 / Published online: 20 July 2017 Ó Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Abstract Forests in virtually all regions of the world trade. The dominant invasion ‘pathways’ are live plant are being affected by invasions of non-native insects. imports, shipment of solid wood packaging material, We conducted an in-depth review of the traits of ‘‘hitchhiking’’ on inanimate objects, and intentional successful invasive forest insects and the ecological introductions of biological control agents. Invading processes involved in insect invasions across the insects exhibit a variety of life histories and include universal invasion phases (transport and arrival, herbivores, detritivores, predators and parasitoids. establishment, spread and impacts). Most forest insect Herbivores are considered the most damaging and invasions are accidental consequences of international include wood-borers, sap-feeders, foliage-feeders and seed eaters. Most non-native herbivorous forest insects apparently cause little noticeable damage but some species have profoundly altered the composition and ecological functioning of forests. In some cases, Guest Editors: Andrew Liebhold, Eckehard Brockerhoff and non-native herbivorous insects have virtually elimi- Martin Nun˜ez / Special issue on Biological Invasions in Forests nated their hosts, resulting in major changes in forest prepared by a task force of the International Union of Forest composition and ecosystem processes. Invasive preda- Research Organizations (IUFRO). tors (e.g., wasps and ants) can have major effects on forest communities. Some parasitoids have caused the Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10530-017-1514-1) contains supple- decline of native hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Establece Regulaciones Para La Importacion De Plantas, Estacas Y Ramillas De Las Siguientes Especies De Carozo: Prunus Armeniaca, P
    RESOLUCIÓN EXENTA Nº: ESTABLECE REGULACIONES PARA LA IMPORTACION DE PLANTAS, ESTACAS Y RAMILLAS DE LAS SIGUIENTES ESPECIES DE CAROZO: PRUNUS ARMENIACA, P. AVIUM, P. CERASIFERA, P. CERASUS, P. DOMESTICA, P. DULCIS, P. MAHALEB, P. PERSICA, P. PERSICA VAR. NUCIPERSICA Y P. SALICINA, PROCEDENTES DE ESTADOS UNIDOS DE NORTEAMERICA Y DEROGA RESOLUCIÓN N° 3.435 DE 2004. Santiago, 09/10/2020 VISTOS: Lo dispuesto en la Ley N° 18.755 Orgánica del Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero; la Ley N° 19.880 que establece bases de los procedimientos administrativos que rigen los actos de los órganos de la administración del Estado; el Decreto Ley N° 3.557 de 1980 del Ministerio de Agricultura sobre Protección Agrícola; el Decreto N° 510 de 2016 del Ministerio de Agricultura que habilita puertos para la importación de mercancías sujetas a revisión del Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero (SAG); el Decreto N° 112 de 2018 del Ministerio de Agricultura que nombra Director Nacional del SAG; la Resolución N° 7 de 2019 de la Contraloría General de la República, las Normas Internacionales para Medidas Fitosanitarias de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (CIPF) de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación, FAO, promulgada por el Decreto N° 144 de 2007 del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, las Resoluciones N°s 3.080 de 2003, 3.815 de 2003, 3.435 de 2004, 796 de 1994, 558 de 1999, 1.523 de 2001, 2.878 de 2004, 1.423 de 2010, 3.589 de 2012, 6.383 de 2013, 7.315 de 2013, 7.316 de 2013 y 7.317 de 2013, todas del Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero.
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • Pests in Northwestern Washington Prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS Survey of Apple Trees to Identify All Leaf-Feeding Apple Pests Currently in Whatcom County
    6. Biology / Phenology a. Biology 1. Exotic Fruit Tree Pests in Whatcom County, Washington Eric LaGasa Plant Services Div., Wash. St. Dept. of Agriculture P.O. Box 42560, Olympia, Washington 98504-2560 (360) 902-2063 [email protected] The Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) has conducted detection surveys and other field projects for exotic pests since the mid-1980's, with funding provided by the USDA/ APHIS Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) program. Recent discovery of several exotic fruit tree pests in northwestern Washington prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS survey of apple trees to identify all leaf-feeding apple pests currently in Whatcom County. Additional exotic apple pest species, new to either the region or U.S. were discovered. This paper presents some brief descriptions of species detected in that project, and other exotic fruit tree pest species discovered in northwest Washington since 1985. Table 1. - Exotic Fruit Tree Pests New to Northwestern Washington State - 1985 to 1995 green pug moth - Geometridae: Chloroclystis rectangulata (L.) An early, persistent European pest of apple, pear, cherry and other fruit trees. Larvae attack buds, blossoms, and leaves from March to June. Damage to blossoms causes considerable deformation of fruit. Larvae are common in apple blossoms in Whatcom County, where it was first reared from apple trees in 1994. This pest, new to North America, was also recently detected in the northeastern U.S. Croesia holmiana - Tortricidae: Croesia holmiana (L.) A common pest of many fruit trees and ornamental plants in Europe and Asia, where it is considered a minor problem. Spring larval feeding affects only leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0099135A1 Enan (43) Pub
    US 20090099.135A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0099135A1 Enan (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 16, 2009 (54) PEST CONTROL COMPOSITIONS AND Publication Classification METHODS (51) Int. Cl. AOIN 57/6 (2006.01) AOIN 47/2 (2006.01) (75) Inventor: Essam Enan, Davis, CA (US) AOIN 43/12 (2006.01) AOIN 57/4 (2006.01) AOIN 53/06 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: AOIN 5L/00 (2006.01) SONNENSCHEN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP AOIN 43/40 (2006.01) AOIP3/00 (2006.01) P.O. BOX 061080, WACKER DRIVE STATION, AOIP 7/04 (2006.01) SEARS TOWER AOIP 7/02 (2006.01) CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080 (US) AOIN 43/90 (2006.01) AOIN 43/6 (2006.01) AOIN 43/56 (2006.01) (73) Assignee: TyraTech, Inc., Melbourne, FL AOIN 29/2 (2006.01) (US) AOIN 43/52 (2006.01) AOIN 57/12 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. ........... 514/86; 514/477; 514/469; 514/481; (21) Appl. No.: 12/009,220 514/395; 514/122:514/89: 514/486; 514/132: 514/748; 514/520; 514/531; 514/.407: 514/365; 514/341; 514/453: 514/343; 514/299 (22) Filed: Jan. 16, 2008 (57) ABSTRACT Embodiments of the present invention provide compositions for controlling a target pest including a pest control product Related U.S. Application Data and at least one active agent, wherein: the active agent can be capable of interacting with a receptor in the target pest; the (60) Provisional application No. 60/885,214, filed on Jan. pest control product can have a first activity against the target 16, 2007, provisional application No.
    [Show full text]
  • VI.2.1.15 RES 6067 05 Ueuropea
    SERVICIO AGRICOLA Y GANADERO ESTABLECE REGULACIONES PARA LA DIRECCION NACIONAL IMPORTACION DE MATERIAL DE REPRODUCCION QUE SE INDICA, PROCEDENTES DE LOS ESTADOS MIEMBROS DE LA COMUNIDAD EUROPEA. SANTIAGO, 7 de noviembre de 2005. HOY SE RESOLVIO LO QUE SIGUE: N°____6067__/ VISTOS: La ley 18.755 Orgánica del Servicio de 1989, modificada por la Ley N° 19.283 de 1994, el Decreto Ley 3.557 de 1980, sobre Protección Agrícola; el Decreto N° 156 de 1998, complementado por el Decreto N° 92 de 1999 del Ministerio de Agricultura; las Resoluciones del Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero N° 3.280 de 1999, N° 2.863 de 2001, N° 3.080 de 2003 , 3.815 de 2003, y N° 2.878 de 2004; y el Acuerdo de Asociación Chile – Unión Europea de 2003 y CONSIDERANDO: 1. Que el desarrollo y fomento de la agricultura y silvicultura dinámica y competitiva requiere del intercambio constante de materiales vegetales sanos y de alta calidad genética, previniendo la probabilidad de introducción y diseminación de plagas. 2. Que se ha realizado el Análisis de Riesgo para Plagas Cuarentenarias del material de reproducción de las siguientes especies, procedentes de los actuales Estados Miembros de la Comunidad Europea: ?? Plantas, estacas y ramillas de: Prunus avium (cerezo dulce), Prunus cerasus (cerezo agrio), Prunus domestica (ciruelo europeo), Prunus salicina (ciruelo japonés), Prunus persica ( duraznero), Prunus persica var. nucipersica (nectarino), Prunus armeniaca (damasco), Malus domestica (=M. pumila) (manzano), Pyrus communis (peral europeo), Citrus spp. (cítricos), Rubus idaeus (frambueso rojo), Rubus occidentales (frambueso negro) Ribes spp. (zarzaparrillas y groselleros) y Vaccinium spp. (árandanos y cramberries).
    [Show full text]
  • Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; Download Unter
    © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.zobodat.at Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 36, Heft 10: 121-176 ISSN 0250-4413 Ansfelden, 2. Januar 2015 An annotated catalogue of the Iranian Braconinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Neveen S. GADALLAH & Hassan GHAHARI Abstract The present work comprises a comprehensive faunistic catalogue of the Braconinae collected and recorded from the different localities of Iran over the past fifty years. It includes 115 species and subspecies in 11 genera (Atanycolus FÖRSTER, Baryproctus ASHMEAD, Bracon FABRICIUS, Coeloides WESMAEL, Glyptomorpha HOLMGREN, Habrobracon ASHMEAD, Iphiaulax FOERSTER, Megalommum SZÉPLIGETI, Pseudovipio SZÉPLIGETI, Rhadinobracon SZÉPLIGETI and Vipio LATREILLE) and four tribes (Aphrastobraconini, Braconini, Coeloidini, Glyptomorphini). Synonymies, distribution and host data are given. Key words: Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae, catalogue, Iran. Zusammenfassung Vorliegende Arbeit behandelt einen flächendeckenden faunistischen Katalog der Braconidae des Irans im Beobachtungszeitraum der letzten fünfzig Jahre. Es gelang der Nachweis von 115 Arten und Unterarten aus den 11 Gattungen Atanycolus FÖRSTER, Baryproctus ASHMEAD, Bracon FABRICIUS, Coeloides WESMAEL, Glyptomorpha 121 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.zobodat.at HOLMGREN, Habrobracon ASHMEAD, Iphiaulax FOERSTER, Megalommum SZÉPLIGETI, Pseudovipio SZÉPLIGETI, Rhadinobracon SZÉPLIGETI und Vipio LATREILLE. Angaben zur Synonymie und Verbreitung sowie zu Wirtsarten werden angeführt. Introduction Braconinae is a large subfamily of cyclostomes group of parasitic wasps in the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea). They constitute more than 2900 described species that are mostly tropical and subtropical (YU et al. 2012). Members of this subfamily are often black, red, orange and/or white in colours. They are small to medium-sized insects, characterized by their concave labrum, absence of epicnemial carina, absence of occipital carina, females have extended ovipositor (SHARKEY 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation
    . JVASV^iX ^ N^ {/) lSNrNVIN0SHilWS*^S3ldVaan^LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Ni <n - M ^^ <n 5 CO Z ^ ^ 2 ^—^ _j 2 -I RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVdan U r- ^ ^ 2 CD 4 A'^iitfwN r: > — w ? _ ISNI NVINOSHilWS SBiyVdan LIBRARIES'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION f^ <rt .... CO 2 2 2 s;- W to 2 C/J • 2 CO *^ 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHilWS S3liiVyan_L; iiSNi"^NViNOSHiiNS S3iyvaan libraries smithsonian'^institution i^ 33 . z I/' ^ ^ (^ RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS S3lbVHan Li CO — -- — "> — IISNI NVINOSHimS S3IMVHan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION N' 2 -J 2 _j 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIifllliSNI NVINOSHIIWS SSIMVyail L! MOTITI IT I f\t _NviN0SHiiws'^S3iMvaan libraries'^smithsonian^institution NOlin z \ '^ ^—s^ 5 <^ ^ ^ ^ '^ - /^w\ ^ /^^\ - ^^ ^ /^rf^\ - /^ o ^^^ — x.ii:i2Ji^ o ??'^ — \ii Z ^^^^^""-^ o ^^^^^ -» 2 _J Z -J , ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIXniliSNI NVINOSHillMS $3 I M VH 8 !!_ LI BR = C/> ± O) ^. ? CO I NVINOSHimS S3iaVHan libraries SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIlf CO ..-. CO 2 Z z . o .3 :/.^ C/)o Z u. ^^^ i to Z CO • z to * z > SMITHS0NIAN_1NSTITUTI0N NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHimS S3 I d ViJ 8 n_LI B R UJ i"'NViNOSHiiws S3ibvyan libraries smithsonian"^institution Noiir r~ > z r- Z r- 2: . CO . ^ ^ ^ ^ ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHillNS SSiyVMail LI BR CO . •» Z r, <^ 2 z 5 ^^4ii?^^ ^' X^W o ^"^- x life ^<ji; o ^'f;0: i >^ _NVIN0SHiIlMs'^S3iyVdan^LIBRARIEs'^SMITHS0NlAN INSTITUTION NOlif Z \ ^'^ ^-rr-^ 5 CO n CO CO o z > SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3 I ^Vd 8 11 LI BR >" _ . z 3 ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A. SOKOLOFF fre s Assistant Editors J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Places and Gradients
    Meeting places There is parking at all the meeting places but this is limited at busy times such as weekends so please arrive early. We are sorry that we cannot provide transport. LVRPA = Lee Valley Regional Park Authority. CPT = Car Parking Tariff, pay by phone or online at home. Walk 1 Around Waltham Abbey (CPT) ( Abbey View, Waltham Abbey, Essex. EN9 1XQ) Level A 0.8 mile. (1.6 miles twice) Gardens, Abbey church and stream. Meet at LVRPA Abbey Gardens car park. Surface Mostly tarmac, hard paths and some grass. Footwear Dry shoes. Gradient All on the flat. Walk 2 Old River Lea Loop (CPT) ( Stubbins Hall Lane, Crooked Mile, Waltham Abbey, Essex. EN9 2EF Continue through carpark towards sailing club and you will see a large parking area on the left) Level A 1.8 miles. Riverside. Meet at LVRPA Fishers Green overflow car park, Waltham Abbey.Surface Tarmac, gravel and earth paths. Footwear Dry shoes. Gradient All on the flat. Walk 3 Seventy Acre Lake (CPT) (Stubbins Hall Lane, Crooked Mile, Waltham Abbey, Essex. EN9 2EF) Level A 1.8 miles. Lakeside. Meet at LVRPA Fishers Green car park nr. Waltham Abbey Surface Tarmac and gravel. Footwear Dry shoes.Gradient All on the flat apart from a very short slope up to the river bridge. Walk 4 Cheshunt Lake (CPT) (Fishers Green Lane, Waltham Abbey, Essex. EN9 2ED) Level A 2.25 miles. Lake and River. Meet at LVRPA Hooks Marsh car park, nr Waltham Abbey. Surface Tarmac and gravel paths. Footwear Dry shoes. Gradient All on the flat apart from a very short slope up to the river bridge.
    [Show full text]