DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Parks and Prehistoric Native American Indian Ruins of Central Arizona

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Parks and Prehistoric Native American Indian Ruins of Central Arizona ARCHAEOLOGICAL PARKS AND PREHISTORIC NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN RUINS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA TONTO NATIONAL MONUMENT * UPPER CLIFF DWELLING “NPS PHOTO” INTRODUCTION The purpose of this website is to provide some information about the prehistory of the Southwest with a focus on two of this regions prehistoric cultures; the Hohokam and Salado and their historic homelands. Native Americans have occupied what is now Arizona for thousands of years. There is no other place in the United States that contains such monumental remnants of prehistoric cultures as does the Southwest desert of North America. The largest Native American reservation (majority of the Navajo Nation ) and the second largest the Tohono O'odham Nation are located in Arizona. The purpose of these pages are also to give visitors to this area a glimpse of the well- preserved ancient dwellings and history of the indigenous people whose civilizations occupied this region. These people flourished here in the Southwest Sonoran Desert centuries ago, prior to the first Spanish explorers arriving here in Arizona around the mid- late 15th century. Instead of the great riches they expected, the Spaniards found self- sustaining communities of natives. Most of the natives were living in simple shelters along fertile river valleys, dependent on hunting and gathering and small scale farming for subsistence as was noted in the journals of the first Spanish explores. It seems that they had reverted back to their archaic ancestor’s way of life centuries before. The first to arrive in Arizona was Fray Marcos de Niza a Franciscan friar in 1539 and was followed a year later by Francisco Vasquez de Coronado. ARTIST VIEW CORONADO’S EXPEDITION (SOURCE * PINEREST.COM) The Southwest is described as extending from Durango, Mexico, to Durango, Colorado, and from Las Vegas, New Mexico, to Las Vegas, Nevada. (Cordell 1984:2) SOUTHWEST CULTURES GEOGRAPHICAL AREA ILLUSTRATION BY JOHN McDONALD Archaeologists believe some of the first early inhabitants arrived here in the Southwest some 11,000 to 15,000 years ago (Paleo-Indian Tradition). Archaeological evidence of the earliest Paleo-Indians in the American Southwest comes from two mammoth kill sites in Southern Arizona. The Lehner Mammoth-Kill Site dating to around 9000 years BCE and the Naco-Mammoth Kill Site dating to about 10,000 years BCE. It’s believed that these Paleolithic people transitioned from a hunting/gathering lifestyle to one involving agriculture and permanent, if not only seasonally, occupied settlements. Archaeologists refer to this period in time as the Southwestern Archaic tradition. In the Southwest the archaic period is generally dated from 8000 B.C. and ending around A.D 150. Archaeologists and historians believe that these desert archaic people eventually evolved into the four major prehistoric cultures in the American Southwest and Northern Mexico. These major cultures are the “Ancestral Puebloans” (formerly called Anasazi) Hohokam, Mogollon and Patayan. Archaeologists use these terms to denote these ancient cultures tradition of the North American Southwest. These ancient Native American cultures occupied the present-day Four Corners area of the United States, comprising Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado. PREHISTORIC CULTURES TRADITIONAL HOMELANDS ILLUSTRATION BY JOHN McDONALD This site is also an attempt to give an insight on these early inhabits who relied heavily on their relationship with “Mother Earth” the sky, the sun and the natural elements to provide food, clothing and shelter. Everything in their daily existence depended upon them. These pages are also an attempt to explain how these prehistoric peoples survived and adapted to this harsh desert environment and of their ingenuity in utilizing desert materials to create wood and stone tools. From animal bone, they made tools, whistles and flutes. From fibers of the agave and other wild desert plants, they wove mats, sandals and rope. From cotton grown in their fields, they wove blankets and clothing. To build structures they would find a deposit of caliche hardpan to use as a foundation and flooring. They erected their roof and wall supports from timber such as fir, pine and juniper from the nearby mountains then plastered the walls of brush and grass with adobe (mud and clay). Potters formed ropes of local clays to coil them into plain, incised or beautifully decorative painted pottery. These artisans would fashion human-animal shaped figurines and obtain paints from crushing local minerals such as Hematite. Using igneous rocks such as chert, obsidian and jasper they manufactured projectile points, knives, choppers. Food processing tools (mano and metates) were made from basalt and granite. Shells imported through trade from Gulf of California and Pacific coast were made into fine jewelry and ornaments. BONE (FAUNA) AWL PHOTO BY JOHN McDONALD If you are a curious individual who is planning a trip or just someone who exhibits a fascination towards historic sites and ancient cultures, there is no better place to start exploring than the historic locations listed below. Visits to these archaeological and national parks promises visitors of all ages an interesting, informative and unforgettable experience. Many of the archaeological parks listed here contain on-site museums that are dedicated to preserving the cultural remains (artifacts) that were found during excavations of these prehistoric sites. These artifacts provide valuable information about the prehistoric people who once inhabited them. Some of the museums attractions include not only displayed artifacts, but exhibitions and videos. Information contained here on these archaeological parks and sites give only a brief introduction about the Native American Cultures who flourished here in the prehistoric Southwest over a millennium ago. For more information about the prehistoric dwellings and the peoples who inhabited them, you may wish to contact the official web page of that site. Driving directions, hours of operation, phone numbers, addresses, tours, activities, facilities and web page links are posted for the parks listed here. Some of the parks listed here have seasonal hours of operation, be sure to visit that parks website or call before planning your trip. HOHOKAM AND SALADO CULTURES HOHOKAM-(A.D. 1 – 1450) –Hohokam was a term deemed by archaeologist Harold S. Gladwin to describe a culture differentiated from others in the region thanks to excavations in the 1930s. They are one of the four major prehistoric archaeological cultures, of the present day four corners areas of the North American Southwest. Archaeologists believe the Hohokam people migrated out of Mexico around CE 200 and occupied the middle Gila and lower Salt River drainage areas, now referred to as the main Hohokam core of the Phoenix and Gila Basins. Early archaeological researchers believe that this culture was made of local decedents of ancient hunter/gathers (Late Archaic Period) who responded to Mesoamerican influences and possibly emerged as the Hohokam. If the Hohokam were not immigrants, then perhaps the Mesoamericans influenced the Hohokam through trade and exchange. The Hohokam traded goods widely across the American Southwest and Mesoamerica with other prehistoric cultures. During this period in time, there were several trade routes from Mesoamerica into southern Arizona. The Hohokam culture occupied a geologically and ecologically diverse region of the North American Southwest. Their region extended from the basin and range, lower desert area of northern Sonora, through southern Arizona, northward to the Mogollon Rim into the southwestern corner of the Colorado Plateau. The main Hohokam core of settlements was located along the Gila and Salt Rivers. These prehistoric people constructed one of the largest and most sophisticated irrigation systems in the North American Southwest, which created a productive agricultural society that lasted for centuries using pre-industrial technology. In 1992 the Hohokam canal system was recognized as a National Civil Engineering Landmark, by the American Society of Civil Engineers. SEE PREHISTORIC CANAL SYSTEM PAGES 24-31. For continued success and management of their canal system the Hohokam culture appeared to have some sort of leadership, or hierarchy structured within their society. Some sort of elite leadership was needed to govern over any conflicts that may have arose from villages and farmers over water issues and keep social harmony among the people. It is also perceived that Hohokam religion played a prominent role in their society as well. These prehistoric people are known for their use of adobe and caliche to construct homes and public architecture such as platform mounds and ball courts. The primary dwelling of the Hohokam culture was a semi-subterranean structure called a “PITHOUSE”. These dwellings would stay cool in the summer and warm in the winter. Pithouses were regularly arranged in groups around an open courtyard referred to by archaeologists as a pithouse cluster. These pithouse villages are believed to be inhabited by extended families. Besides providing shelter from environment, these structures may also have been used to store food. The larger structures may have been used, not as residences, but as gathering places for telling stories, dancing, singing and cultural celebrations. HOHOKAM MODEL PITHOUSE (SOURCE * PINEREST.COM) They were skilled artisans who carved marine shell jewelry stone palettes, and stone beads and pendants. They also made a distinctive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FACT SHEET OVERVIEW Lower Cliff Dwelling Construction Sequence
    southwestlearning.org TONTO Lower Cliff Dwelling FACTOVERVIEW SHEET Construction Sequence ARCHIVES SERVICE PARK NATIONAL Tonto National Monument, established in 1907, protects several cliff dwelling sites and numerous smaller archeo- logical sites scattered throughout the highlands and allu- vial plains within the Tonto Basin, Arizona. The Lower Cliff Dwelling is one of two large sites accessible to the public, and is the primary site visited in the Monument throughout the year. Background The Lower Cliff Dwelling consists of an approximately 20- room masonry and adobe village built within a natural al- cove above a side drainage of the Salt River called Cholla Canyon and overlooking Cave Canyon, where there is now an active spring. The site itself has been known since at The Lower Cliff Dwelling at Tonto National Monument, ca. 1905. least the late 1800s, and unfortunately, was subject to exces- sive looting and associated damage long before becoming a lage was not built all at once, however, and instead started Monument in 1907 and later coming under the protection of with only one or two rooms, to which additional rooms the National Park Service (NPS) in 1933. However, histor- were added over a period of perhaps 30 years (Nordby et ic photographs, excavation and stabilization records (e.g., al. 2012). New rooms were built on bedrock, artificially Duffen 1937; Pierson 1952), and recent research provide leveled floors, and accumulated trash. While the rocks and some indication of when and how the Lower Cliff Dwelling clay for the adobe were readily available (Nordby et al. was constructed, and to some extent, by whom.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Perspectives on the Hohokam
    Bulletin of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center Tucson, Arizona December 2009 Number 60 Michael Hampshire’s artist rendition of Pueblo Grande platform mound (right); post-excavation view of compound area northwest of Pueblo Grande platform mound (above) TRIBAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE HOHOKAM Donald Bahr, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Arizona State University The archaeologists’ name for the principal pre-European culture of southern Arizona is Hohokam, a word they adopted from the O’odham (formerly Pima-Papago). I am not sure which archaeologist first used that word. It seems that the first documented but unpublished use is from 1874 or 1875 (Haury 1976:5). In any case, since around then archaeologists have used their methods to define and explain the origin, development, geographic extent, and end of the Hohokam culture. This article is not about the archaeologists’ Hohokam, but about the stories and explanations of past peoples as told by the three Native American tribes who either grew from or replaced the archaeologists’ Hohokam on former Hohokam land. These are the O’odham, of course, but also the Maricopa and Yavapai. The Maricopa during European times (since about 1550) lived on lands previously occupied by the Hohokam and Patayan archaeological cultures, and the Yavapai lived on lands of the older Hohokam, Patayan, Hakataya, Salado, and Western Anasazi cultures – to use all of the names that have been used, sometimes overlappingly, for previous cultures of the region. The Stories The O’odham word huhugkam means “something that is used up or finished.” The word consists of the verb huhug, which means “to be used up or finished,” and the suffix “-kam,” which means “something that is this way.” Huhug is generally, and perhaps only, used as an intransitive, not a transitive, verb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction and Occupation of Unit 11 at Paquimé, Chihuahua
    THE CONSTRUCTION AND OCCUPATION OF UNIT 11 AT PAQUIMÉ, CHIHUAHUA DRAFT (February 5, 2009), comments welcomed! David A. Phillips, Jr. Maxwell Museum of Anthropology Department of Anthropology MSC01 1050, 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA Elizabeth Arwen Bagwell Desert Archaeology, Inc. 509 South 48th Street, Suite 104 Tempe, Arizona 85281 USA Abstract Understanding Paquimé’s internal development is important to regional prehistory, but the sheer amount of published data deters attempts to interpret the site’s construction history. The challenge can be reduced to a workable size by examining individual architectural units within the site. By way of illustration, a re-study of Unit 11 (House of the Serpent) indicates that its construction history may differ somewhat from the original published account. The approach used in the re-study is frankly experimental and is offered in the hope that others will be able to improve on it (or else prove its lack of utility). Three decades ago, in the most influential report ever prepared on northwest Mexican prehistory, Charles Di Peso and his colleagues described Paquimé (Di Peso 1974; Di Peso et al. 1974; see also Contreras 1985). Since then, the site’s construction history has received little detailed attention. Instead, recent discussions have focused on dating the site as a whole (End Note) or on the presence or absence of a multistory “east wing” (Lekson 1999a:80; 1999b; Phillips and Bagwell 2001; Wilcox 1999). In recent years, the most detailed studies of Casas Grandes construction have come from other Casas Grandes sites (Bagwell 2004; Kelley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico Archaeology New Mexico Archaeology
    NTheNew ewNewsletter MMexicoexico of the Friends AArchaeology rchaeologyof Archaeology November 2014 From The Director Pottery on the web Eric Blinman Ph.D, Director OAS Office of Archaeological Studies is delighted to an- I’m writing this with the knowledge that I have yet again nounce the launch of a new research tool and valuable violated Jessica’s trust in me in her role as editor. My deadline addition to our website. The Pottery Typology Project, for producing this column was last week, but in the press created by C. Dean Wilson is an online compendium of of responsibility and opportunity there’s been no time until the Native pottery of New Mexico found in archaeologi- now. In some senses, my procrastination has been fortunate, cal context. since the week has been intense and reorienting, and Jessica’s patience is just one of many reminders of how fortunate we all are to have each other. The Friends of Archaeology and OAS both work, and probably work so well together, because there is an underlying passion for and commitment to the subject matter and potential of archaeology. This attitude leads to effort above and beyond any reasonable expectation from both staff and volunteers. Jessica and her volunteers have put up with a lot of stress caused by the rest of us in their journey to produce each of the newsletters, and the results are easy to both appreciate and take for granted. Sheri worked hard, with only inconsistent support from me, to pull together the logistics Why is a pottery typology on line important? Since the of the wonderfully successful Canyon of the Ancients tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sinagua Sites Tour: Montezuma Castle, Montezuma
    Information as of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center Presents: March 4, 2021 99 a.m.-5:30a.m.-5:30 p.m.p.m. SouthernSouthern SinaguaSinagua SitesSites Tour:Tour: MayMay 8,8, 20212021 MontezumaMontezuma Castle,Castle, SaturdaySaturday MontezumaMontezuma Well,Well, andand TuzigootTuzigoot $30 donation ($24 for members of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center or Friends of Pueblo Grande Museum) Donations are due 10 days after reservation request or by 5 p.m. Wednesday May 8, whichever is earlier. SEE NEXT PAGES FOR DETAILS. National Park Service photographs: Upper, Tuzigoot Pueblo near Clarkdale, Arizona Middle and lower, Montezuma Well and Montezuma Castle cliff dwelling, Camp Verde, Arizona 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Saturday May 8: Southern Sinagua Sites Tour – Montezuma Castle, Montezuma Well, and Tuzigoot meets at Montezuma Castle National Monument, 2800 Montezuma Castle Rd., Camp Verde, Arizona What is Sinagua? Named with the Spanish term sin agua (‘without water’), people of the Sinagua culture inhabited Arizona’s Middle Verde Valley and Flagstaff areas from about 6001400 CE Verde Valley cliff houses below the rim of Montezuma Well and grew corn, beans, and squash in scattered lo- cations. Their architecture included masonry-lined pithouses, surface pueblos, and cliff dwellings. Their pottery included some black-on-white ceramic vessels much like those produced elsewhere by the An- cestral Pueblo people but was mostly plain brown, and made using the paddle-and-anvil technique. Was Sinagua a separate culture from the sur- rounding Ancestral Pueblo, Mogollon, Hohokam, and Patayan ones? Was Sinagua a branch of one of those other cultures? Or was it a complex blending or borrowing of attributes from all of the surrounding cultures? Whatever the case might have been, today’s Hopi Indians consider the Sinagua to be ancestral to the Hopi.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIZONA INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION • ANNUAL REPORT FY 2006 Letter from the Chairwoman
    ARIZONA INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION • ANNUAL REPORT FY 2006 Letter From The Chairwoman It is our pleasure to present the third Annual Report for the Arizona Indian Gaming Association (AIGA). This report celebrates the contributions that gaming tribes are making for all Arizonans. Native people have a tradition of sharing with the community, whether we are sharing our knowledge and wisdom, artistic heritage or our natural or manmade resources. This tradition of cooperation and sharing is common to all tribes and is part of our culture. In Arizona, for example, in the 1800s, when the Pima people saw the needs of the military and settlers, they willingly shared their water and food with them. Sharing is a tradition that repeats throughout our history. With the passage of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and the subsequent agree- ments reached with the state of Arizona for tribes to establish and continue gaming on their lands, we are now sharing the benefits from our successful enterprises with our own people and with others throughout our state. The magnitude of sharing represents a remarkable change in a very short time frame. Twenty-five years ago, no one could have imagined that Arizona tribes, always the poorest of the poor, would be contributing millions of dollars every year to support education, health care, conservation and tourism to the state of Arizona. Or 1 that hundreds of charities would be helped every year by generous grants and donations from individual tribes. While this report is a celebration of sharing, it is also a call to action.
    [Show full text]
  • Bamboo House Building Manual
    Manual on Building Bamboo Houses This manual on how to build a bamboo house comes as a result of research conducted at the Engineering Structures Research Centre at City University by a team of development engineers funded by Pell Frischmann Consulting Engineers. The purpose of their research is to help communities where this kind of information is not accessible and yet the most valuable. The aim of the information provided here is to share knowledge on how to construct low-rise housing that is resistant to earthquakes, particularly in developing countries. The design plans produced by this team require only basic construction skills and tools. The materials are sustainable, durable, and can often be locally obtained. The development team is headed by Professor Kuldeep S. Virdi of City University, London, and Mr. Rossen D. Rashkoff. We appreciate their efforts and commitment to making safe and sustainable housing more accessible. Building materials 1. Introduction The construction materials for building a bamboo house should be readily available and accessible. Traditionally used construction materials are considered. The bamboo based house has a very low weight therefore foundations can be minimised. For wall construction are used wall panels, assembled from split bamboo grids and chicken steel mesh and plastered with cement mortar. Basic materials for house components (bamboo, wire, bolts, chicken mesh, and cement) are inexpensive. Bamboo can tolerate high values of deformations in the elastic range i.e. possesses high elasticity. Therefore bamboo houses when properly constructed are ductile i.e. being able to sway back and forth during an earthquake, without any damage to the bamboo poles.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum Pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, Or Independent Domestication
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, or Independent Domestication Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1v84t8z1 Journal KIVA, 83(4) ISSN 0023-1940 Authors Graham, AF Adams, KR Smith, SJ et al. Publication Date 2017-10-02 DOI 10.1080/00231940.2017.1376261 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California KIVA Journal of Southwestern Anthropology and History ISSN: 0023-1940 (Print) 2051-6177 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ykiv20 A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, or Independent Domestication Anna F. Graham, Karen R. Adams, Susan J. Smith & Terence M. Murphy To cite this article: Anna F. Graham, Karen R. Adams, Susan J. Smith & Terence M. Murphy (2017): A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, or Independent Domestication, KIVA, DOI: 10.1080/00231940.2017.1376261 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00231940.2017.1376261 View supplementary material Published online: 12 Oct 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ykiv20 Download by: [184.99.134.102] Date: 12 October 2017, At: 06:14 kiva, 2017, 1–29 A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, or Independent Domestication Anna F. Graham1, Karen R. Adams2, Susan J. Smith3, and Terence M.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Adobe Mudbrick in Application – Child-Care Centre Construction in El Salvador
    13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 705 IMPROVED ADOBE MUDBRICK IN APPLICATION – CHILD-CARE CENTRE CONSTRUCTION IN EL SALVADOR Dominic DOWLING1 SUMMARY Major earthquakes in Latin America, Asia and The Middle East have served as recent reminders of the vulnerability of traditional adobe (mudbrick) dwellings to the force of earthquakes. A host of research, training and construction projects continue to address this precarious situation and there have been various publications describing the developments in improved adobe (mudbrick) design and construction in recent years. These publications have mostly originated from research institutions and have tended to focus on the technical and experimental details of a variety of improvement systems. The dissemination of this important information is a vital component in the challenge to promote and build safer homes. Furthermore, these advances in technical detail must be accompanied by practical information, which relates to the actual application of the proposed systems, addressing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. This paper attempts to address the current deficiency of this practical information, and thus provide adobe constructors and proponents with a realistic understanding of some of the practical issues related to improved adobe construction. This paper describes the technical and practical aspects and ‘lessons learned’ from a recent improved adobe construction project in El Salvador, as well as drawing on field investigations, laboratory research and other literature. The paper concludes with a proposed addition to the current technical evaluation of the performance of improvement systems: the assessment of the skill level and resources required to effectively incorporate improved adobe systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 26064 001 Cover Page.Indd
    UNIT I THE O'ODHAM O'ODHAM VILLAGE LIFE 11 Students will participate in simulated O'odham cultural activities to include an O’odham language lesson and role-playing various daily tasks such as food preparation, games, weaving and pot making. PAGE 1.7 CREATE AN O'ODHAM VILLAGE 22 Students will place a fictional O'odham village along a Santa Cruz River map while using their knowledge of cultural needs and climate restrictions. They will describe the advantages of their chosen site and draw a sketch of their village. PAGE 1.17 UNIT I - ARIZONA STATE STANDARDS - 2006 Lesson 1 - The O'odham SUBJECT STANDARD DESCRIPTION S1 C2 PO1 describe cultures of prehistoric people in the Americas S1 C2 PO2 describe cultures of Mogollon, Anasazi, Hohokam SOCIAL S1 C3 PO3 describe the location and cultural characteristics of Native STUDIES Americans S4 C5 PO1 describe human dependence on environment and resources to satisfy basic needs S1 C4 PO2 use context to determine word meaning S1 C4 PO3 determine the difference between figurative and literal language S1 C6 PO1 predict text content READING S1 C6 PO2 confirm predictions about text S2 C1 PO1 identify the conflict of a plot S2 C1 PO5 describe a character's traits S1 C1 PO1 generate ideas WRITING S1 C1 PO5 maintain record of ideas MATH S4 C1 PO2 identify a tessellation (mat weaving) SCIENCE S4 C3 PO1 describe how resources are used to meet population needs Lesson 2 - Create an O'odham Village SUBJECT STANDARD DESCRIPTION S1 C2 PO1 describe the cultures of prehistoric people in the Americas S1 C2 PO2 describe
    [Show full text]
  • Hohokam Legacy: Desert Canals (Pueblo Grande Museum Profiles No
    Hohokam Legacy: Desert Canals (Pueblo Grande Museum Profiles No. 12) Jerry B. Howard Introduction Visitors to the Salt River Valley are often surprised to discover a fertile agricultural region flourishing in the arid Arizona desert. However, these modern agricultural achievements are not without precedent. From A.D. 600 to 1450, the prehistoric Hohokam constructed one of the largest and most sophisticated irrigation networks ever created using preindustrial technology. By A.D. 1200, hundreds of miles of these waterways created green paths winding out from the Salt and Gila Rivers, dotted with large platform mounds (see Illustrations 1 and 2). The remains of the ancient canals, lying beneath the streets of metropolitan Phoenix, are currently receiving greater attention from local archaeologists. We are only now beginning to understand the engineering, growth, and operation of the Hohokam irrigation systems. This information provides new insights into the Hohokam lifestyles and the organization of Hohokam society. Illustration 1. Extensive Canal System built by the Hohokam and others to divert water from the Gila River. (Source: Salt River Project) 1 www.waterhistory.org Hohokam Legacy: Desert Canals Illustration 2. Extensive Canal System built by the Hohokam to divert water from the Gila River. (Source: Southwest Parks and Monuments Association) Early Records of the Prehistoric Canals When the first explorers, trappers, and farmers entered the Salt River Valley, they were quick to note the impres- sive ruins left by the Hohokam. Villages containing platform mounds, elliptical ballcourts and trash mounds covered with broken ceramic pots and other artifacts existed throughout the valley. Stretching out from the river was a vast system of abandoned Hohokam canals that ran from site to site across the valley floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    Edward P. Dozier: A history of Native- American discourse in anthropology. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Norcini, Marilyn Jane. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 19:56:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187248 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript ,has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete mannscript and there are mjssjng pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note wiD indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and contim1jng from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]