DOCSLIB.ORG

Waste Management Introduction This Is Loipart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waste Management Introduction This Is Loipart marine food service, laundry and waste solutions WASTE MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION THIS IS LOIPART • Specialists in marine food service, laundry and waste solutions. • Approximately 200 employees. • Customers in 62 countries. • A track record of deliveries on more than 12,000 ships. • More than 40 years of experience. • Privately owned. • The highest AAA credit rating. • Offices in Sweden, USA, Korea, Finland and Singapore. • Agents and representatives all over the world. FROM SINGLE UNIT DELIVERY TO TURNKEY SOLUTIONS LMG Finland Loipart AB Sweden Loipart South Korea Co Loipart USA Inc Loipart Sea Pte Ltd DESIGN & LAUNDRY PROVISION WASTE GALLEYS INSTALLATION SERVICE & LAYOUTS AREAS ROOMS MANAGEMENT PANTRIES & & AFTER SALES SYSTEMS BARS COMMISSIONING INTRODUCTION Pollution of the marine environment can have adjust space, equipment and needs accordingly. both biological and economic impacts. In recognition of the harm that garbage does to the marine environment, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted MARPOL Annex V with HOW CAN WE HELP? the aim of preventing pollution by waste from With our technical expertise and experience we ships. can assist clients worldwide with efficient and Management of ship-generated garbage has become a complex area, both legally and technically. Layout design On board survey WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Review of Garbage Management Plan Various types of waste are generated during Conversions and upgrades operation and in order to implement a waste Turn-key deliveries management system, it is necessary to identify Spare parts and services and quantify the different types of waste on board. Management, handling and disposal of ship- generated garbage can be divided into different innovative solutions for ship-generated garbage phases with several options in each phase and also improve the environmental performance depending on vessel resources and port and strategies on board. reception facilities. The handling and storing of garbage will vary WHY INVEST IN A WASTE MANAGEMENT depending on type of vessel, areas of operation, number of people on board, etc. SYSTEM? Careful planning, with proper processing and garbage disposal options in mind, can ensure • Reducing costs compliance with regulations as well as efficient • Regulatory compliance waste management. • Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) A Garbage Management Plan should be prepared early in the design process for new-buildings to • Better working conditions for the crew A waste management system is more than just installing a waste compactor! Ship-generated garbage Placards Garbage Management Plan Garbage Record Book Dry waste Food waste Hazardous waste Training & Survey Chute system Gravity system Vacuum system Port Reception Facilities On board In office Shredding Compaction Crushing Overboard MARPOL Annex V Port Reception Facilities Baling press Compactor Port Reception Facilities REGULATIONS & STANDARDS MARPOL ANNEX V IACS ADDITIONAL CLASS NOTATIONS Activities related to the management of ship- All IACS members have developed voluntary generated garbage are broadly regulated environmental class notations where the internationally by MARPOL Annex V. The revised requirements are in compliance with, or more MARPOL Annex V was adopted at MEPC.62 by the extensive than, those found in international resolution MEPC.201(62) and entered into force standards currently in force. on January 1st 2013. ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES REGIONAL AND NATIONAL Sustainability and environmental performance REQUIREMENTS have become important factors for many owners The requirements of MARPOL Annex V set the and several voluntary environmental initiatives minimum standard for garbage management and with scoring systems have been developed, which more specific requirements may exist in regional makes it possible for charterers to select ships or national jurisdictions. and ship owners on the basis of environmental During a Port State Control the inspectors may performance. inspect the Garbage Management Plan, Garbage Record Book and Placards, but also cleanness in the garbage room. A B C D E IMO MARPOL Regional or National IACS Environmental Environmental requirements Environmental initiatives Policy Class notations Flag State and Port State Performance beyond the requirements! FOOD WASTE Food waste is one of the most difficult waste to GRAVITY SYSTEM handle on board as it biodegrades readily and We have developed a new generation food waste contribute to odour. By treating the fraction system for smaller vessels which is based on where it is produced, in the galley, minimum gravity. transport and work for the crew can be achieved The system includes a disposer integrated with a as well as proper hygiene in the galley. control system and an automatic dosing system Historically a simple disposer has been installed for antiscalant chemicals to minimize the risk under the sink in the galley and no attention has of blockage in the piping system. The disposer been paid to where the ground food waste has grinds food waste into small pieces and combined been discharged... with water creates a slurry. Food waste and food contaminated waste are The batch feeding process takes place locally strictly regulated ashore under health rules where the disposer station(s) is located and the concerning ’animal-by-products’ and will be system is designed for automatic operation. subject to quarantine requirements. The ground food waste is discharged directly • Food waste is a difficult to handle on board. overboard or directed to a holding tank. This means that the system can be in operation even • Common with clogged pipes for existing if the vessel is operating within an area where installations. discharge is prohibited. • Quarantine waste which requires special handling in port. KEY FEATURES DESCRIPTION GRAVITY SYSTEM • Avoid clogged pipes • Controlled velocity in the piping system Food waste • Wide range of options for water consumption savings • Simple touchscreen operation panel In the galley Free-standing Disposer • Automatic dosing control for antiscalant (GMU) chemicals • For retrofit and new-buildings • Easy installation! 1 2 • Flexible connections for installation on existing units Overboard Holding tank MARPOL Annex V Restrictions 2a 2b Overboard Port Reception Facilities MARPOL Annex V Quarantine waste Restrictions VACUUM SYSTEM We have in close co-operation with on board crew members developed a new generation of FOOD WASTE vs SEWAGE TREATMENT food waste system. The system utilizes vacuum PLANT technology to minimize the risk of blockage in Food waste is not defined as sewage or grey the piping system and is designed for automatic water and shall not be discharged into a vessel’s operation and batch feeding. sewage treatment plant as it will contribute to increased levels of BOD (Biochemical Oxygen WORKING PRINCIPLE OF THE SYSTEM Demand) and the sewage treatment plant might fail to treat the sewage in accordance with IMO The system is designed for treatment and requirements. transportation of food waste in compliance with MARPOL Annex V and other relevant regulations KEY FEATURES and standards. No other types of waste are allowed to enter the system. • Avoid clogged pipes The system has the possibility to isolate and lock the overboard discharge during operation • High level of efficiency with consistently high within an area where discharge is prohibited. vacuum performance The ground food waste can then be directed to a • Vacuum pump with non-contact compression holding tank designed for food waste. without operating fluid • Low water consumption • Small and flexible piping • Compact system, skid mounted units • Control system indicates leakage and clogged pipes • Proven low level of maintenance! • For retrofit and new-buildings Food waste Food waste • Easy installation! A A Scullery Pot wash Vacuum Disposer Vacuum Disposer Annex V Restrictions B Food waste Overboard VACUUM Unit 1 Annex V Restrictions 2 C Overboard Food waste Holding Tank Port Reception Facilities Quarantine waste DRY WASTE As a part of the system for ship-generated waste, processing equipment such as compactors, baling SHREDDERS presses, shredders and crushers can be installed A shredder processes a higher quantity of on board to optimize storage space and make ship-generated garbage into shredded pieces. It garbage easier to store and to transfer to port can be used prior to the compactor to increase reception facilities. Garbage collection points with receptacles should be located in appropriate spaces throughout the ship and the garbage should be stored in a manner, which avoids health, safety and environmental hazards. Waste fractions to be recycled at port reception facilities should be separated prior to the on board processing. In order for a waste management system to be successful, the crew must have an environmental awareness and understand the importance of the compaction ratio, but it also works well in minimizing generation of and separating the combination with an shipboard incinerator. waste. It is not recommend to process food waste in the shredder! BALING PRESSES & COMPACTORS CHUTE SYSTEMS Ship-generated garbage, such as paper, various plastic waste, cardboard and packaging A chute system is a cost-effective and efficient materials, can be compacted and reduce the way for the on board transportation of ship- volume of garbage into bales. When enough generated garbage and minimizing the risk for material exists in the chamber to form a bale, the cross contamination. baling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GARBAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN Issued Date: 30 January 2015
    ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED GGAARRBBAAGGEE MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT PPLLAANN For Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit Aban Ice As Required by MARPOL Annex V, (resolution MEPC.201(62) and all other subsequent resolutions) (for more detailed guidance, please consult the 2012 Guidelines for the Implementation of MARPOL Annex V (resolution MEPC.219(63)) Page 1 of 23 Section: TOC ABAN ICE Revision No.: 1 GARBAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN Issued Date: 30 January 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Approved By: A. Gray Section Title Effective Date Rev No. GMP ICE Garbage Management Plan Aban Ice 29 July 2010 0 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Regulatory Requirement 3.0 Prevention and Reduction of Pollution from Garbage 4.0 Designated Persons for Plan Implementation and Maintenance 5.0 Collection, Storage, and Disposal Procedure 6.0 Training 7.0 Placards 8.0 Record of Garbage Discharges 9.0 Records 10.0 References Appendices A Definitions 29 July 2010 0 B Summary of At Sea Garbage Disposal Regulations 30 Jan 2015 1 C Compaction Options for Ship-generated Garbage 29 July 2010 0 D Garbage Record Book 29 July 2010 0 E Summary of Ship Handling and Disposal of Garbage 29 July 2010 0 F Aban Ice Organization Chart 29 July 2010 0 Page 2 of 23 Section: GMP Ice ABAN ICE Revision No.: 1 GARBAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN Issued Date: 30 January 2015 GARBAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN ABAN ICE Approved By: A. Gray 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The intent of this document is to provide Aban Ice personnel with information on the requirements for complying with applicable regulations of MARPOL 73/78, Annex V and all other subsequent resolutions, and Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE of SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS U. S. Department Of
    OFFICE OF SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 January 2016 U. S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration OBSOLETE SHIPS RESERVE FLEET MARITIME ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 I. Ship Disposal Programs ........................................................................................................... 5 Domestic Scrap Steel Prices ....................................................................................................... 5 Domestic Recycling Industry ...................................................................................................... 7 Environmental Stewardship ........................................................................................................ 7 Ship Disposal Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 8 Best Value Ship Disposal Source Selection Process .................................................................. 9 Ship Disposal Funding .............................................................................................................. 10 Sales Revenues ......................................................................................................................... 11 Fiscal Year 2016 Disposal Activities .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Market-Based Approaches for Environmental Management in Asia July 2021
    GREENING MARKETS MARKET-BASED APPROACHES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN ASIA JULY 2021 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GREENING MARKETS MARKET-BASED APPROACHES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN ASIA JULY 2021 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2021 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2021. ISBN 978-92-9262-934-2 (print); 978-92-9262-935-9 (electronic); 978-92-9262-936-6 (ebook) Publication Stock No. TCS210239-2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TCS210239-2 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbreaking: Hazards and Liabilities This Is a FM Blank Page Michael Galley
    Shipbreaking: Hazards and Liabilities ThiS is a FM Blank Page Michael Galley Shipbreaking: Hazards and Liabilities Michael Galley Law Research Centre Southampton Solent University Southampton Hampshire United Kingdom ISBN 978-3-319-04698-3 ISBN 978-3-319-04699-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04699-0 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014944731 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Competitiveness of Green Ship Recycling
    Improving the Competitiveness of Green Ship Recycling Kanu Priya Jain Propositions accompanying the thesis Improving the Competitiveness of Green Ship Recycling from Kanu Priya Jain Sep 8, 2017 Delft University of Technology 1. The availability of a downstream market for second-hand goods is essential for a ship recycling yard to become competitive. (This thesis) 2. The lack of co-ordination between the stakeholders of the ship recycling industry is detrimental to cost-effective green ship recycling. (This thesis) 3. A ship cannot be called ‘futuristic’ until it is designed in such a way that it can also be recycled easily. 4. The more efficient and reliable the transportation system is, the more traumatic a deficiency will be for commuters. 5. The global climate will be better-off without UN climate change conferences. 6. Cooking is like a Chemistry experiment, quantity of each ingredient has a major influence on the end result. 7. Social media is a catalyst for exhibitionism, narcissism and depressions. 8. Assumptions are the most effective tool for a successful research. 9. The greatest hurdle to finish a thesis on time is procrastination. 10. Other than the traditional news media, daily commuting is the best way to be aware of local events. These propositions are regarded as opposable and defendable, and have been approved as such by the promotor prof. ir. J.J. Hopman and copromotor dr. ir. J.F.J. Pruyn. IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF GREEN SHIP RECYCLING Kanu Priya Jain IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF GREEN SHIP RECYCLING Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Reefs
    CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CIVIL JUSTICE service of the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE 6 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS POPULATION AND AGING The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY organization providing objective analysis and effective SUBSTANCE ABUSE solutions that address the challenges facing the public TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY and private sectors around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. This product is part of the RAND Corporation documented briefing series. RAND documented briefings are based on research briefed to a client, sponsor, or targeted au- dience and provide additional information on a specific topic. Although documented briefings have been peer reviewed, they are not expected to be comprehensive and may present preliminary findings. Artificial Reefs A Disposal Option for Navy and MARAD Ships MICHAEL V. HYNES, JOHN E. PETERS, DENIS RUSHWORTH DB-391-NAVY March 2004 Prepared for the United States Navy Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this briefing was sponsored by the United States Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:03-cv-02000-RMC Document 69 Filed 03/02/05 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) BASEL ACTION NETWORK, a Sub- ) project of the Tide Center and SIERRA ) CLUB ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 03-2000 (RMC) ) MARITIME ADMINISTRATION, ) CAPT. WILLIAM G. SCHUBERT, in his ) official capacity, ADMINISTRATOR; ) and ) ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL ) LEAVITT, in his official capacity, ) ADMINISTRATOR ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The Maritime Administration (“MARAD”) must dispose of decommissioned military vessels that constitute the Non-retention ships in the National Defense Reserve Fleet (“NDRF”). Congress requires that this disposal be completed by the end of fiscal year 2006. Approximately seventy (70) of these aging hulks are moored at the James River Reserve Fleet (“JRRF”) in Virginia. When MARAD proposed to conduct tandem tows to move 13 of these ships to a shipbreaker in Teesside, United Kingdom in the fall of 2003, plaintiffs Basel Action Network (“BAN”) and The Sierra Club filed this action, with a request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, on the grounds that the export of the vessels would violate several federal environmental laws. On October 2, 2003, this Court issued a temporary restraining order (“TRO” with respect to Case 1:03-cv-02000-RMC Document 69 Filed 03/02/05 Page 2 of 34 nine of the thirteen ships, finding that MARAD had not completed an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement. Basel Action Network v. Mar. Admin., 285 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2003). Because MARAD had submitted the “functional equivalent”1 of an environmental assessment (“EA”) to Congress for the four ships, their departure was not enjoined.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbreaking and the Basel Convention: Analysis of the Level of Control Established Under the Hong Kong Convention
    SHIPBREAKING AND THE BASEL CONVENTION: ANALYSIS OF THE LEVEL OF CONTROL ESTABLISHED UNDER THE HONG KONG CONVENTION April 2011 1350 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20036. • 15 Rue des Savoises, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland. This legal analysis has been prepared by CIEL Attorneys Marcos A Orellana and David Azoulay and CIEL Law Fellows Hana Heineken and Serena Corbetta. Comments or questions are welcome at [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 2. Background to Shipbreaking under the Basel Convention and the Hong Kong Convention ... 10 2.1 Shipbreaking, Health & the Environment ........................................................................... 10 2.2 The Basel Convention & Shipbreaking ................................................................................ 13 2.2.1 Fundamentals of the Basel Convention ....................................................................... 13 2.2.2. Shipbreaking under the Basel Convention .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JOBS and DOLLARS OVERBOARD the Economic Case Against Dumping U.S
    BASEL ACTION NETWORK December 2010 JOBS and DOLLARS OVERBOARD The Economic Case Against Dumping U.S. Naval Vessels at Sea December 2010 Author: Colby Self Editor: Jim Puckett BASEL ACTION NETWORK www.ban.org │ 206.652.5555 206 First Avenue South, Suite 410 │ Seattle, WA 98104 BAN is a 501(c)3 charitable organization of the U.S. The Basel Action Network (BAN) is the world's only organization focused on confronting the global environmental injustice and economic inefficiency of toxic trade (toxic wastes, products and technologies) and its devastating impacts. Working at the nexus of human rights and environment, we confront the issues of environmental justice at a macro level, preventing disproportionate and unsustainable dumping of the world's toxic waste and pollution on our global village's poorest residents. At the same time we actively promote the sustainable and just solutions to our consumption and waste crises – banning waste trade, while promoting green, toxic free and democratic design of consumer products. Learn more by visiting www.ban.org or view BAN’s 2009 Annual Report. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................1 INTERNALIZED COSTS ...................................................................................................................................2 Artificial Reefing Costs .................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Technological and Economic
    FINAL REPORT COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SHIP SCRAPPING IN EUROPE REPORT NO. 2000-3527 REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS – APPLEDORE INTERNATIONAL DET NORSKE VERITAS – APPLEDORE INTERNATIONAL FINAL REPORT Date of first issue: Project No.: DET NORSKE VERITAS 2001-02-13 590 00159 REGION NORGE AS Approved by: Organisational unit: Environmental Advisory Services Environmental Advisory Services Christian L. S. Rafn Veritasveien 1, 1322 HØVIK, Norway Head of Section Tel: +47 67 57 99 00 Fax: +47 67 57 99 11 Client: Client ref.: http://www.dnv.com Commission of the European Magnus Level Org. No: NO 945 748 931 MVA Communities Summary: The study has considered the feasibility of undertaking the procedures associated with the disposal of four vessel categories with respect to technology and economy within Europe, the wider European Economic Area and in neighbouring countries (Eastern Europe and Russia). The four categories are: · Offshore structures · Merchant fleet · Inland waterway vessels · Naval vessels Findings and conclusions are based on assessments including the review of decommissioning and disposal decision factors, type and volume forecast predictions, established procedures, market opportunities, legislative framework and compliance expectations. The report presents disposal forecast results for each vessel category and provides guidance on the potentials and opportunities of undertaking such activity in Europe. Limitations and requirements associated with decommissioning,
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Electrical Energy Storage for Ships
    European Maritime Safety Agency STUDY ON credit: itsflowingtothesoul/Shutterstock.com ELECTRICAL ENERGY STORAGE FOR SHIPS BATTERY SYSTEMS FOR MARITIME APPLICATIONS – TECHNOLOGY, SUSTAINABILITY AND SAFETY May 2020 EMSA MARITIME BATTERY STUDY Electrical Energy Storage for Ships EMSA European Maritime Safety Agency Report No.: 2019-0217, Rev. 04 Document No.: 11B59ZDK-1 Date: 2020-05-05 Project name: EMSA Maritime Battery Study DNV GL AS Maritime Report title: Electrical Energy Storage for Ships Environment Advisory Customer: EMSA European Maritime Safety Agency, Veritasveien 1 Cais do Sodré 1363 Høvik 1249-206 LISBOA Norway Portugal Customer contact: Ricardo Batista Date of issue: 2020-05-05 Project No.: 10122143 Organisation unit: Environment Advisory Report No.: 2019-0217, Rev. 04 Document No.: 11B59ZDK-1 Applicable contract(s) governing the provision of this Report: Objective: Review the technologies and applications relevant for storing electrical energy on ships. Prepared by: Verified by: Approved by: Henrik Helgesen Gerd Petra Haugom Terje Sverud Senior Consultant Principle Consultant Head of Section Sondre Henningsgård Benjamin Gully Narve Mjøs Discipline Leader Senior Engineer Director Battery Services & Projects Andrea Aarseth Langli Nathaniel Frithiof Consultant Senior Consultant Copyright © DNV GL 2020. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise agreed in writing: (i) This publication or parts thereof may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, whether digitally or otherwise; (ii) The content of this publication shall be kept confidential by the customer; (iii) No third party may rely on its contents; and (iv) DNV GL undertakes no duty of care toward any third party. Reference to part of this publication which may lead to misinterpretation is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • ABS Garbage Management Manual
    ABS Garbage Management Manual Every ship of 100 gross tonnage and above, and every ship certified to carry 15 persons or more, and fixed or floating platforms shall carry a garbage management plan. Additionally, every ship of 400 gross tonnage and above, and every ship certified to carry 15 persons or more engaged in voyages to ports or offshore terminals under the jurisdiction of another party to MARPOL and every fixed or floating platform shall carry a Garbage Record Book. Also, every ship of 12 meters or more in length overall and fixed or floating platforms shall display placards to notify the crew and passengers of the ship’s disposal requirements. The garbage management plan shall provide written procedures for minimizing, collecting, storing, processing and disposing of ship-generated garbage, including the use of the equipment on board. It shall also designate the person or persons in charge of carrying out the plan. Such a plan shall be in accordance with the guidelines developed by the organization and written in the working language of the crew. There shall also be a Garbage Record Book for recording each discharge into the sea or a reception facility or completed incineration. • What is the intent of the Garbage Management Manual? To provide a systematic approach to the enforcement and control of garbage in the marine environment. • How will that be accomplished? By requiring shipboard management plans for crews to follow which provide written procedures for minimizing, collecting, storing, processing and disposing of ship-generated garbage, including the use of equipment on board, in accordance with Regulation 10[2] of Annex V MARPOL 73/78.
    [Show full text]