DOCSLIB.ORG

'Afotlernj'1l'jeynotes Se,Oat1hflllllnstitute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Afotlernj'1l'jeynotes Se,Oat1hflllllnstitute ,~.. ,, -~ . .... !""~~:-· i ;i·: ;;'St., :~·, • 0 1::;•:: .. • . ' ·y•' ' ·.G.·. ·.· :'1-·d·· ·. · ·· ;~... ·. .. 1···e··' ·s······ ~:-. -·o··-·-· . " ' . ., .for . .. ·_. '. ' ·. .,, ISf:ael. ::,r:7.··":-··, ·-'<·;.' .. : :;::/·: .... >;:. ::._·-. :'.-:~ n ,· .r -;..;...;~--:---:--:-.---·-:------:--:--:--:---:----,------:--:-----:::--:--:-.,t",,.·,--:------~---;iiiiiiiii.----=--;;;---===--=====~ · ~· · · Paa ly Ot:,an Issues Warning ·Adenauer :e ·.raid It's WINNIPEG. MAN .• FRIDAY, AUGUST 19, 1955 'Delitate' ' . · TEL AVIV (JTA)-Chancel­ '· VS.· ·ANTI-SEMITISM Ben 611rion ·Reported Ciinlident. ~- . lor Konrad Aden~uer bas in­ 'l • . NEW YORK (JTA}-For the first time in many yeai,i dicated in a private· conver­ ,an ofiicial.orgari of "!,e Communist· P:u-ty of_ the So~et saiion with Dr. Nahum Gold• ,, ,Union bas appeared wxth a sharply-worded article warnmg marin, that West Germany is 'against anti-Semitism1 according to a report in last Slinday's ready to establish diplomatic 'New .. York Times. · . · , relations with Israel. ·., ' . : · The report, evidently written by a Time• "expert'' In its •New ,Yark office, comments that "explicit attacks 011 anti~tism have been. absent. from internal propaganda themes" in :Moscow for quite . However, according to Dr. , ' tim' . • ' Goldmann, th• Germani realln ew ovt. n ; .a.. e. · . · . , ·· . · • It then quotes an article which in last month's issue the "dellc•cy" of 'th• quHtlon , of uparty Life,"_ organ!A~onal mag:~~d . e of the Comm1111lst ,Pa,tY and wlll not takca the Initiative, of the USSR, as declarmg. · . · "While fighting all forms of bourgeois natil"nallsm, the Com­ The Jewish leader said here 64 OF 120 BACKING munist Party turns the attention of workers to the special harm of Tuesday. he had gained such an JERUSALEM (JTA}-.Circles close to David Ben Gurion UJA To. 'AfotlernJ'1l'Jeynotes antl-8emitism. V. L Lenin, in ·hi • speech 'On the Persecution of Impression from a .conference he Jews in Pogroms' . ·• exposed the criminal policy of capitalists, had had last Saturday with Aden­ tre reported confident be will succeed ·1,n f~rming a coalition designed to lnfJam" hatred toward Jews in· order to divert workers government next. week c~mposed of Mapai, Mapam, Acbdut attention from their resl enemy-from capital. auer in Switzerland, •Where •both• men had been vacatlonlng. Re Avodab and the Progrei;:ives. , · .· ✓ , · . · . u 'Shame. to.. accuned Curlam. tormenting Ind. penecut• · (Accordl119 to the election rflults, this would. gin the. gonm- · , 1119- Jews,' Lenin said. !Shame. to th- who sow hatred to made the statement ·tn 'reply to a 'Tighten' Se,Oat1HflllllnstitUte····.' • ', ' ' ' ·, .fl ·• ' ' .ment the backing of 64 of the 120 KnflHt ~rt). · •Jew1, who sow hah"ed to other nations.' , • ~ Th• Communist question at a press conference The same ckcles say that the Religious partle, would also be , ' . I \-(\.;· party hat always carried on a nlentlHa 11trunl• a11aln1t about the possibilitles .of German­ weleome, If they would af!j'~ .to 111pport Golda :Myerson, M•pai antl-Semltl1m a1 a phenomenon dNply hostile to the SOYlet . structure." ' ' ' Israel diplomatic relations . Jetder, for Jilafor of Tel Aviv. · · Goldmann a."'l'i\'l!d in Israel Tues­ (Sff earlln 1tor, below) day to attend· a session, of the . ' ,' ~ _. -·~-·- ' --- - --- . .,__ . \Vorld ·Zionist Actions Committee . M'eaiiwhile a- slight puNfc tussle emerged between the rightist He also revealed that bill ~ HerutillDd PreshJent Itzhal' }jeJl Zvl, with that .party rejecting the a Pre1llknt'1 invitation to conNlt about the government situation· be­ to be int~uced In the Bonn par­ came he did not call the111 in to 1ee him right after he spoke with liament next month dealing with the Mapai repr~ntatlvea. he BEN ZVI, , ... 3 lndiyldual compensation •W h I c h .would also benefit Nazi victims who are former ·residents of what is, n9w 'East Germany, . He ~Id this proposal had been considered at tbe meeting with Adenauer, and also how best to make use of German· reparations pact. clauses. · • · . Goldmann ' also said that' the Austrians, upon arrival of the re­ cent repl\fatlons agree.ment, ·will establlsh a $22,000,000Jund under a truat arrangement, for distribu• tion, as restltutiori arid, compen­ satl9n, to 15,QOO ~o)7,000'fiimllies. ·• He •said the Austrian · plan , is better.. thari_ the .~rman,: because · lump sum paymenbi .wlll. be made liy Austria; while Ge11T1•DY paya in instalments · "· ·,·· · ··, · · · · . ' . •'. ' ., . : ·.1 ' ' , \ / .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Labor Party and the Peace Camp
    The Labor Party and the Peace Camp By Uzi Baram In contemporary Israeli public discourse, the preoccupation with ideology has died down markedly, to the point that even releasing a political platform as part of elections campaigns has become superfluous. Politicians from across the political spectrum are focused on distinguishing themselves from other contenders by labeling themselves and their rivals as right, left and center, while floating around in the air are slogans such as “political left,” social left,” “soft right,” “new right,” and “mainstream right.” Yet what do “left” and “right” mean in Israel, and to what extent do these slogans as well as the political division in today’s Israel correlate with the political traditions of the various parties? Is the Labor Party the obvious and natural heir of The Workers Party of the Land of Israel (Mapai)? Did the historical Mapai under the stewardship of Ben Gurion view itself as a left-wing party? Did Menachem Begin’s Herut Party see itself as a right-wing party? The Zionist Left and the Soviet Union As far-fetched as it may seem in the eyes of today’s onlooker, during the first years after the establishment of the state, the position vis-à-vis the Soviet Union was the litmus test of the left camp, which was then called “the workers’ camp.” This camp viewed the centrist liberal “General Zionists” party, which was identified with European liberal and middle-class beliefs in private property and capitalism, as its chief ideological rival (and with which the heads of major cities such as Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan were affiliated)­.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Context Domestic Aspects of Strategic Postures: the Past and Future in a Middle East Nuclear Regime
    The Regional Context Domestic Aspects of Strategic Postures: The Past and Future in a Middle East Nuclear Regime ETEL SOLINGEN This paper examines domestic aspects of the debate over the establishment of a regional nuclear regime in the Middle East. It does so in order to offset the marginal attention paid to the impact of domestic processes and institutions in the definition of strategic outcomes.' The call for incorporating domestic politics into the study of international regimes is not new but, with few exceptions, has been rarely followed by actual applications.2 That failure has not been the subject of great controversy in the analysis of nuclear options in the Middle East, because neorealist assumptions about the primacy of state survival considerations have gained unparalleled analytical supremacy. The potential for physical annihilation compelled a neorealist point of departure, even when neorealist assumptions led to no particular saddlepoint, or solution (in logical terms, the search for survival could have led to a range of means and outcomes). That different domestic actors are likely to define strategic options with different considerations in mind seems self-evident. Domestic groups weigh different international outcomes according to the latter's potential effect on their own political and institutional pay-offs. The pay-offs associated with different outcomes can be affected by different mixes of side-payments. For instance, no military establishment entrusted with maintaining conventional deterrence would endanger its access to conventional weapons, the means with which it maintains its mission. In general terms, domestic actors rank their preferences according to the rate at which they discount the future, their degree of receptivity to transparency, their sensitivity coefficients to gaps in gains, and/or their definition of a 'balanced exchange'.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Press: a Comparative Analysis of "Assafir" and "The Jerusalem Post"
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2001 Framing and Counterframing of the Middle East Peace Process in the Arab -Israeli Press: a Comparative Analysis of "Assafir" and "The Jerusalem Post". Houda Hanna El-koussa Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation El-koussa, Houda Hanna, "Framing and Counterframing of the Middle East Peace Process in the Arab -Israeli Press: a Comparative Analysis of "Assafir" and "The eJ rusalem Post"." (2001). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 401. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/401 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Form: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Israel- Elections 2003
    1 Macro Report Form: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Israel- Elections 2003 Part I: Data Pertinent To the Election at Which the Module was Administered 1. Name of political party and No. of portfolios – prior to elections Likud – 13 (9 ministers with portfolios, 3 ministers without portfolios and P.M Sharon with 4 portfolios) Labor (Avoda) – 6 Shas – 5 Israel Baaliya –2 Mafdal – 2 1a. 28 ministers. 2. Name of political party and No. of portfolios – after the elections Likud – 14 (11 ministers with portfolios and P.M Sharon with 3 portfolios) Mafdal – 2 Shinui – 5 National Union –2 2a. 23 ministers. 3. Political Parties: Party Year party founded Ideological family Likud (Herut) Herut -1948 ; became Right liberal parties “Likud”- 1973 Labor- “Avoda”, (Mapai)* Mapai-1920 ; became Social-democratic parties “Avoda”- 1968 Shinui 1974; renewed 1999 Liberal parties Shas 1984 Religious parties (Ultra-orthodox) Meretz (Civil rights Civil rights movement- Left socialist parties movement) 1973; became “Meretz”- 2 1992 National Union (Moledet- Moledet-Tkuma-1988; Extreme nationalist parties Tkuma) National Union- 1999 *Belongs to the Socialist International. 3a. No. 3b. No. Labor Party- with electoral support of 19 seats out of 120. 3c. No. 4a. Ideological positions of parties: Likud-7 Labor-3 Shinui-5 Shas-8 Meretz – 2 National Union-9 4aa. Yes. 4b. The respondents were not asked to rank political parties on an alternative dimension. 5. The five most salient factors that affected the outcome of the elections: 1. Intifada- Terrorism- Arafat. 2. Sharon’s leadership. 3. The weak Labor alternative. 4. Shinui as a protest vote; religious tensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Netanyahu's Long Premiership and the Rise of The
    POLISH POLITICAL SCIENCE YEARBOOK, vol. 47(2) (2018), pp. 201–214 DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018203 PL ISSN 0208-7375 www.czasopisma.marszalek.com.pl/10-15804/ppsy Artur Skorek Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland) Benjamin Netanyahu’s Long Premiership and the Rise of the New Political Center: Is there a Qualitative Change in the Israeli Party System? Abstract: Israel’s party system has been characterized by the bipolar rivalry between the left-wing and right-wing blocks since the late 1970s. In recent years we could have seen at least two trends that seem to diverge from this model. For the last 9 years the Likud party has formed three successive governments which has made Benjamin Netanyahu the longest continuously serving prime minister in the history of Israel. Another new occurrence is the preservation of a significant representation of the center parties for four Knesset terms in the row. The aim of the paper is to verify whether Israel’s party system has departed from the two-blocs bipolar model. Based on the empirical data (election results, government formation, party’s political platforms) it examines whether the parties’ rivalry in the years 2009 – 2018 differed qualitatively from the previous period. To answer this question the pa- per investigates three hypotheses. First – Likud has become a dominant party in Israel. Sec- ond – a dominant and stable Israeli right-wing parties’ bloc has formed. Third – an enduring and relevant center sector has emerged in Israel’s party system. Keywords: Likud; Israel; party system; center; right-wing; left-wing Introduction The history of the Israeli party system can be divided into at least two phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman
    Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman To cite this version: Yonatan Berman. Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019. 2020. halshs-03022224 HAL Id: halshs-03022224 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03022224 Preprint submitted on 24 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East 1977 2
    Collection: Office of the Chief of Staff Files Series: Hamilton Jordan's Confidential Files Folder: Middle East, 1978 Container: 35 Folder Citation: Office of the Chief of Staff Files, Hamilton Jordan's Confidential Files, Middle East, 1978, Container 35 INTRODUCTION As we go into the Summer with the prospect of a visit from the new Israeli head of state and the possibility of a new Vance mission to the Middle East, I think that it is important that we appreciate and understand the special and potentially constructive role that the American Jewish community can play in this process. I would compare our present understanding of the Amer­ ican Jewish lobby (vis-a-vis Israel) to our understanding of the American labor movement four years ago. We are aware of its strength and influence, but don't understand the basis for that strength nor the way that it is used politically. It is something that was not a part of our Georgia and Southern political experience and con­ sequently not well understood. I have attempted in the following pages to do several things: 1) Outline the reasons and the basis for the influence of the American Jewish community in the political life of our country; 2) Define and describe the mechanism through which this influence is used; 4) Describe - as I understand it - the present mood and situation in the American Jewish community as relates to you and your policies; and 5) Define a comprehensive plan for consultation with the American Jewish community with the ultimate goal of gaining their understanding and/or support for our efforts to bring peace to the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties
    Political Parties: Political Parties and Interest Groups in Israel Gregory Mahler Earlham College Richmond, Indiana December 9-11, 2007 Parliamentary Government • “Westminister” vs. Presidential Government – 1. Split executive – 2. President symbolic; Prime Minister and Cabinet powerful – 3. Prime Minister and Cabinet from the Knesset – 4. Government responsible to the Knesset • The Knesset and the Prime Minister • The President Political Ideology • l. Private enterprise (a) vs. socialism (b); • 2. "Activist" Arab policy (c) vs. restraint (d); • 3. Torah oriented life (e) vs. secularism (f); • 4. Pro-Soviet Union (g) vs. pro-West (h); • 5. Zionist (i) vs. non-Zionist (j).* A---------------------------------------------------------------------B C---------------------------------------------------------------------D E---------------------------------------------------------------------F G---------------------------------------------------------------------H I----------------------------------------------------------------------J * Thomas Goodland, "A Mathematical Presentation of Israel's Political Parties," British Journal of Sociology 8 (1957): 263-66. Political Parties Functions of Political Parties – Personnel Agencies – Organize Groups and Articulate Demands – Frame of Reference – Linkage Mechanisms The Electoral System • Proportional Representation (Israel) vs. Single-Member-District Representation (U.S.) • Electoral Lists of Political Parties • Accuracy of Representation • The 1992 “Deviation” The Complexity of the Coalition-Formation Process • Situation I: Simplest Majority Possibilities – Parties: A (44), B (42), C (14) AB, AC, BC, ABC • Situation II: More Complex Majority Possibilities – Parties: A (38), B (20), C (17), D (15), E (10) AB, AC, AD, ABC, ABD, ABE, ADE, BCD, etc. • Situation III: Most Complex Majority Possibilities – Parties: A (30), B (19), C (12), D (9), E (8), F (8), G (7), H (7) ABC, ABD, ABE, ABF, ABG, BCDE, CDEFGH, etc. Approx. Life of Date of Govt. Knesset Prime Minister (Party) Coalition Partners Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Election Results in Israel, 1949-2019
    Chapter 19. "Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019" Yonatan Berman Appendix: Figures, tables and raw results Main figures and tables Figure 1 Legislative election results in Israel, 1949-2019 Figure 2 Class cleavages in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 3 Vote for right and left in Tel Aviv, Israel, 1949-2019 Figure 4 Residual identity component in Tel Aviv, Israel, 1981-2015 Figure 5 Vote for right-wing and left-wing parties among unemployed and inactive voters in Israel, 2003-2015 Figure 6 The educational cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 7 Vote for right-wing parties among Sepharadic voters in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 8 The religious cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 9 The gender cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Appendix figures and tables Figure A1 General election results in Israel by bloc, 1949-2019 Figure A2 Income inequality in Israel, 1979-2015 Figure A3 Vote for left by social class (excluding center and Arab parties), 1969-2019 Figure A4 Vote for the Republican and Democratic candidates in New York City, 1948-2016 Figure A5 The effect of the 2003 reforms on left and right vote Figure A6 Share of voters by ethnicity and religiosity, 1969-2019 Table A1 Division of parties to blocks Table A2 The effect of the 2003 reforms on right vote Figure 18.1 - Legislative election results in Israel, 1949-2019 100% Right (Likud, Israel Beitenu, etc.) Left (Labor, Meretz, etc.) 90% Center (Kahol Lavan, etc.) Arab parties (Joint Arab List, etc.) 80% Ultra-orthodox (Shas, Yahadut HaTora, etc.) 70% 60% 50% 40% Share of votes (%) votes of Share 30% 20% 10% 0% 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 Source: author's computations using official election results (see wpid.world).
    [Show full text]
  • Theses Digitisation: This Is a Digitised
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] POLITICAL PARTIES IN A NEW SOCIETY (THE CASE OF ISRAEL) Ovadia Shapiro PhD. Thesis University of Glasgow 1971. ProQuest Number: 10647406 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uesL ProQuest 10647406 Published by ProQuest LLO (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLO. ProQuest LLO. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I should like to acknowledge debts of gratitude to; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mo(Ve)Ments of Resistance
    ——————————————————— Hebrew Terms ———————————————————— mo(ve)mentS OF RESISTANCE Lev Luis Grinberg — 1 — ——————————————————— Hebrew Terms ———————————————————— Israel: Society, Culture and History Series Editor: Yaacov Yadgar, Political Studies, Bar-Ilan University Editorial Board: Alan Dowty, Political Science and Middle Eastern Studies, University of Notre Dame Tamar Katriel, Communication Ethnography, University of Haifa Avi Sagi, Hermeneutics, Cultural Studies, and Philosophy, Bar-Ilan University Allan Silver, Sociology, Columbia University Anthony D. Smith, Nationalism and Ethnicity, London School of Economics Yael Zerubavel, Jewish Studies and History, Rutgers University — 2 — ——————————————————— Hebrew Terms ———————————————————— mo(ve)mentS OF RESISTANCE Politics, Economy and Society in Israel/Palestine 1931-2013 Lev Luis Grinberg Boston 2014 — 3 — Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A catalog record for this book as available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2014 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved Effective February 13, 2018 this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. Open Access publication is supported by: ISBN 978-1-936235-41-4 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-618110-69-5 (electronic) ISBN 978-1-618117-90-8 (open
    [Show full text]