The Ukrainian Weekly 1987

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ukrainian Weekly 1987 Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.. a fratTnal non-profit association| rainianWeel;lY Vol. LV No.5 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 1,1987 25 cent3 Supreme Court denies Linnas' petition Buchanan honored in Chicago JERSEY CITY, N.J. - The Su­ Meese could stop the deportation. preme Court on Tuesday, January 27, Ms. Razgaitis also told The Weekly as Man of the Year denied Karl Linnas' petition for a that ADP is currently lobbying mem­ rehearing, thus clearing the way for his bers of Congress and showing an ADP- by Marianna Liss deportation to the Soviet Union, where produced videotape on the Linnas case Mr. Linnas faces the death peanlty. The in an effort to block his deportation. CH1CAGO ~ Patrick J. Buchanan, court did not disclose the vote break­ Various East European groups are special assistant to the president and down. supporting the effort by phoning the White House director of communica­ Death was the sentence handed down White House and asking that Mr. tions, received the Man of the Year in 1962 by a Soviet court after Mr. Linnas, an Estonian, not be sent to face Award from the Ukrainian Congress Linnas was tried in absentia and found a certain death. Committee of America, lUinois Divi­ guilty of Nazi war crimes. The verdict Among the groups opposing Mr. sion, during the annual Ukrainian was announced in the Soviet press even Linnas'deportation to the Soviet Union 1ndependence Day dinner. The event before the trial had begun. is Amnesty International, a worldwide took place in Rosemont, a suburb of Final approval for deportation to the human-rights organization that has Chicago, on January 25. USSR, however, still has to be given by spoken up on the Linnas case because of Chicago attorney Julian Kulas acted Attorney General Edwin Meese, said its opposition to the death penalty. as master of ceremonies. He comment­ Rasa Razgaitis, national coordinator of The Supreme Court first turned ed, in introducing Mr. Buchanan, that Americans for Due Process (ADP). She down Mr. Linnas' appeal on December the communications director was an added that President Ronald Reagan, 1, 1986, by a vote of 6 to 3 (one vote expert on the history of Russian Com­ Secretary of State George Shultz or Mr. (Continued on page 15) munism and shared the aspirations of Ukrainians and other enslaved nations. Presenting the award was Dr. Myro- Ukrainian EvangeliGal Alliance leader, slaw Charkewyczv state pFesident x)f the UCCA. He expressed appreciation for Pastor VVladimir Borowsky, dies Mr. Buchanan's public stands against questionable agreements with the DUNWOODY, Ga. - The Rev. and served as editor-in-chief of Evange­ Soviet Union and for supporting the Wladimir Borowsky, executive secre­ lical Morning (Evanhelsky Ranok), the president. Mr. Buchanan was given the Patrick Buchanan tary of the Ukrainian Evangelical periodical pubHshed by the Ukrainian award for his courage in bringing up blinka, the death camp were Mr. Dem­ Alliance of North America, died here on Evangelical Alliance of North America, issues of controversy and concern to all January 25. He was 80 years old. as well as its English-language supple­ janjuk \yas supposed to have been, do Americans, and Ukrainian Americans not have his name on them; some He was also a pastor in the Ukrai­ ment, The Ukrainian Christian Herald. in particular. nian Evangelical-Reformed Church He was born on January 18, 1907,in witnesses say that a camp guard named Mr. Buchanan, in accepting the 1van died in 1943; and the Polish Zinkiv, western Ukraine. He comp1eted award, shared his personal views on the theological studies in 1931 in Viensburg, government has not allowed the defense use of Soviet evidence in American attorney to interview witnesses. Alvin Kapusta, western Poland. In 1932 he was or­ courts, specifically in the John Demjan- dained a pastor of the Ukrainian Evan­ Expressing his own opinion on the juk case. Mr. Demjanjuk is now await­ matter, and not that of the U.S. govern­ gelical-Reformed Church in western ing trial in 1srael on war crimes charges. Soviet specialist, Ukraine. ment or the Reagan administration, he He was persecuted by Polish authori­ Stating that Mr. Demjanjuk is inno­ urged Ukrainians not to abandon Mr. dead at 57 ties in western Ukraine for his involve­ cent, Mr. Buchanan said, "He is a tragic Demjanjuk and his family. He appealed ment in P1ast, a Ukrainian youth victim of American gullibility and of to the mass media to keep an open mind Soviet malice." He reviewed the evi­ about the case, and not to assume the WASH1NGTON - Alvin Kapusta, organization, as well as other Ukrai­ nian organizations. dence against the man, repeating some man to be guilty. the U.S. State Department's first special of his previous arguments: he contends assistant for Soviet nationalities, who His pastoral work was interrupted by Referring to other sensational cases the Soviet invasion of western Ukraine, that many of the eyewitness accounts of suspected war criminals suchas those retired in 1985 after 30 years of service have been contradictory; the Soviet­ for the U.S. government, died here on and he and his family fled the country. of Polish-born Chicagoan Frank After Wor1d War 11 he resumed his supplied 1.D. card is in question; camp Walus; Ivan Stebelsky a Ukrainian­ January 25. He was 57. transfer lists from Trawniki to Tre- Mr. Kapusta organized the Soviet (Continued on page 12) (Continued on page 9) Nationalities Division in the Office for Analysis of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Koryagin describes prison conditions in smuggled notes Mr. Kapusta was born January 13, JERSEY C1TY, N.J. - Notes appa­ to the Working Commission on the 1930, in Max, N.D., to a family of rently written by imprisoned Soviet Abuse of Psychiatry for Political Pur­ eastern Ukrainian emigrants who had psychiatrist Anatoly Koryagin detailing poses. He was sentenced to seven years f1ed tsarist Russia to escape persecution the harsh conditions of his incarcera­ in a strict-regimen labor camp and five for their Baptist beliefs. 1n North tion were reportedly smuggled out of years' internal exile for "anti-Soviet Dakota he comp1eted his undergra­ the Soviet Union and reached the West agitation and propaganda" and was duate education in secondary education late last year, reported The New York sent to the Perm prison system in the and taught school there for two years. limes. Urals. 1n January 1986 his sentence was After returning from service in the extended by two years for "resisting Korean War, Mr. Kapusta comp1eted The notes, which were reportedly representatives of authority who are his graduate studies at the University of written by the 48-year-old dissident designated to preserve public order." California at Berkeley where he re­ from Kharkiv, Ukraine, who is well­ The notes containing the description ceived a master's degree in Slavic known for his opposition to the use of of his imprisonment were received languages and literatures. psychiatry for political purposes, des­ through the Bukovsky Foundation Prior to his entry on duty at the State cribed how he has been in solitary based in Amsterdam and were trans­ Department, he had served two years confinement for three years, on a lated into English by Freedom House in with the U.S. Army, including an hunger strike for two years and con­ New York, the Times reported. assignment with the 302nd Military fined to a punishment cell for half a "1 am waging my struggle for the Intelligence Company, a prisoner-of­ year, the Times wrote. rights of political prisoners, for their war interrogation unit. Mr. Koryagin was arrested on Feb­ human dignity, for their lives and (Continued on page 12) Anatoly Koryagin ruary 2, 198 i, for his work as consultant (Continued on page 2) THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 1987 No.5 A GLIMPSE OF SOVIET REALITY З00 LatvJan youths demonstrate ROCKVILLE, Md. - Approxima­ the Soviet occupation in 1940), passed tely З00 Latvian youths marched down the Latvian Monument of Liberty and Ukrainian writers continue push the main street of Riga, Latvia, at headed northeast along the three-lined midnight, December27,1986,shouting, boulevard toward a Soviet-built statue "Down with Soviet Russia! Freedom in of Lenin. The entire path of the march for status of native language a Free Latvia." could be seen from the 27-story Hotel by Roman Solchanyk confronted him with the "testimony" of Western tourists, who witnessed the Latvija, which is located across the one of the witnesses for the prosecution, demonstration from their Intourist street from the Lenin statue. Picking up where they left off last who confidently asserted: "I knew right hotel windows, reported that a police June at their congress, Ukrainian away that Stus is a nationalist because car was overturned with passengers Eyewitnesses report that the local writers are continuing to push for an he always spoke Ukrainian." inside. It is believed that the youths were police kept a low profile during the improvement in the over-all status of The difference now is that the current returning from a rock concert in the Old demonstration, although it is believed the native language in Ukraine. The campaign for glasnost has made it Town section of the city. The youths that at least four arrests were made. venue this time was a plenum of the possible for such "negative phenomena" marched down Lenin Boulevard After reaching the Lenin statue the board of the Ukrainian Writers'Union to be discussed on the pages of the (known as Freedom Boulevard prior to crowd dispersed into the city streets. convened in Kiev on November 18, Soviet press.
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • International Organizations and Settlement of the Conflict in Ukraine
    International Organizations and Settlement of the Conflict in Ukraine Alena F. Douhan* Abstract 195 I. Introduction 196 II. The United Nations and the Conflict in Ukraine 199 1. UN Security Council 199 2. UN General Assembly 201 3. Other UN Organs 202 III. Regional Organizations and the Conflict in Ukraine 203 1. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe 203 2. Council of Europe 205 3. European Union 206 4. North Atlantic Treaty Organization 208 5. Collective Security Treaty Organization 209 IV. Conclusions 211 Abstract The situation in Ukraine has been a matter of concern for the interna- tional community since January 2014 and remains a central focus of legal and political scientists. The United Nations (UN) Security Council ap- peared to be unable not only to settle the conflict but also to take any feasi- ble measures for its settlement. As a result, a range of regional organizations became involved in the crisis. This article examines the legal perspectives of the activity of the UN and regional organizations which aimed to prevent, detain and settle the conflict in Ukraine. It also determines the specifics of methods used by each organization, assesses the efficacy of their activity and develops proposals for enhancement of their effectiveness. * Associate Professor of the International Law Department, Belarusian State University, Ph.D. (Minsk); where in this article only the title of a document is mentioned in a footnote, reference is made to press-statements of the United Nations accessible at <http://www.un. org>. ZaöRV 75 (2015), 195-214 http://www.zaoerv.de © 2015, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 196 Douhan I.
    [Show full text]
  • How Far Can the EU Expand? the Dilemmas of Ukrainian Membership
    EU crisis simulation 2013 issue brief How Far Can the EU Expand? The Dilemmas of Ukrainian Membership By Scott N. Duryea While the Council of Europe faces many important issues affect the future of the EU, few involve the geopolitical pressures and question of European identity raised by the possibility of Ukraine membership. Opening membership to European democracies is a foundational concept of the EU, but Ukraine possess great difficulties; it is a very large country (roughly the same in size and population to France), poor it brings difficult relations with Russia. Ukraine has a long border with Russia; 2300 km (1400 miles) long and hosts Russia’s most important navy base. Its population includes are large Russian minority. Some 30 percent of its population (14.5 million out of 45.6 million people) are native Russian-speakers. Bringing Ukraine into the EU would transform the country, and the EU. Refusing to admit Ukraine might have equally powerful consequences. Ukraine is increasingly falling into the fold of the European Union. Many Ukrainians seek eventual membership into the EU, but a number of pressing issues must be resolved before Ukraine fully goes west. These include reforming Ukrainian bureaucracy, obeying the rule of law, cracking down on corruption, and evading Russian attempts to keep Ukraine from breaking away from its unhealthy Eurasian ties. At stake is not just the future of the concept of Europe and European relations with Russia, but the future of Ukrainian democracy and national identity. As stated in the EU Council Conclusions on Ukraine of 10 December 2012, Ukraine’s EU status focuses on three elements of reform: 1 The compliance of the 2012 parliamentary elections with international standards and follow-up actions, Ukraine’s progress in addressing the issue of selective justice and preventing its recurrence, and Implementing the reforms defined in the jointly agreed Association Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Respect for Human Rights During the Armed Conflict in Ukraine
    RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS DURING THE ARMED CONFLICT IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL APPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS LAW Contract # AID-OAA-I-13-00032, Task # AID-121-TO-16-00003 USAID Nove Pravosuddya Justice Sector Reform Program Contract Officer representative: Oleksandr Piskun, Democracy Project Management Specialist, Office of Democracy and Governance, USAID Mission to Ukraine Development Objective 2: Accountability and Transparency of the Judiciary to Citizens and the Rule of Law Increased Author: Mykola Gnatovsky, Associate Professor of the International Law, Institute of International Relations, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv; President of the European Committee for Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Provided by: Chemonics International Inc. June 30, 2017 Disclaimer Positions of the authors in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the US Agency for International Development or the US Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS Definition of the Rules of International Humanitarial Law Applicable to the Armed Conflict in Ukraine ...................................................................................... 1 Basic Principles of Applying International Humanitarian Law .................................. 1 Obligations to Prosecute Persons Guilty of War Crimes under the European Convention on Human Rights ................................................................................. 6 Practical Application of International Humanitarian Law in Ukraine (2014-2017)
    [Show full text]
  • Gennadiy Druzenko Permanent Address: 11 Avtozavodska St., Ap
    Name: Mr. Gennadiy Druzenko Permanent address: 11 Avtozavodska st., ap. 108, Kyiv, 04074, Ukraine Telephone: + 380 50 3579922 Email: [email protected] Nationality: Ukrainian Date of birth: 28 April 1972 Education 2007-2008 University of Aberdeen (Scotland, UK), LL.M. in European Law (Chevening Scholar), Degree with commendation 1999-2000 Ukrainian Centre for Legal Studies of National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Master of Law (Degree with distinction) 1995-1999 International Science and Technology University (Kyiv, Ukraine), Bachelor of Law (Degree with distinction) 1992-1993 Christian Theological College of Kyiv, Diploma in Theology Trainings, summer schools ect. Summer School The European Decision-Making Process (Institute 2008 for European Studies of the Vrije Universiteit in Brussels & Diplomatic Academy of Vienna) 2007 Summer School for Academic English (Aberdeen, UK) 2006 Summer University for Democracy (Strasbourg) 2006 Ukrainian School for Political Studies (established by the CoE Directorate General of Political Affairs) 2004 Training trip to Brussels and Strasbourg for getting to know the work of the EU institutions (European Union Visitors Programme) 2002 Training trip to Poland "Study of Polish experience of adoption of acquis communautaire" 2000 Summer school of the EU law "European Studies – 2000" Employment record Fulbright-Kennan Institute Research Scholar (Woodrow Wilson 09.2009 – till now International Center for Scholars, Washington DC) 07.2005-07.2007 Vice-president of the Institute for European Integration
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Tatar Question: a Prism for Changing Nationalisms and Rival Versions of Eurasianism*
    The Crimean Tatar Question: A Prism for Changing Nationalisms and Rival Versions of Eurasianism* Andrew Wilson Abstract: This article discusses the ongoing debates about Crimean Tatar identity, and the ways in which the Crimean Tatar question has been crucial to processes of reshaping Ukrainian identity during and after the Euromaidan. The Crimean Tatar question, it is argued, is a key test in the struggle between civic and ethnic nationalism in the new Ukraine. The article also looks at the manner in which the proponents of different versions of “Eurasianism”—Russian, Volga Tatar, and Crimean Tatar—have approached the Crimean Tatar question, and how this affects the attitudes of all these ethnic groups to the Russian annexation of Crimea. Key words: Crimean Tatars, Euromaidan, Eurasianism, national identity, nationalism—civic and ethnic Introduction In the period either side of the Russian annexation of Crimea, the Crimean Tatar issue has become a lodestone for redefining the national identities of all the parties involved. The mainstream Crimean Tatar movement has been characterized by steadfast opposition first to the Yanukovych regime in Ukraine and then to Russian rule. This position has strengthened its longstanding ideology of indigenousness and special rights, but it has also * The author is extremely grateful to Ridvan Bari Urcosta for his invaluable help with research for this article, to Bob Deen and Zahid Movlazada at the OSCE HCNM, to Professor Paul Robert Magocsi, and to the anonymous reviewers who made useful comments and criticisms. 1 2 ANDREW WILSON belatedly cemented its alliance with Ukrainian nationalism. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s would‐be new supra‐ethnic civic identity draws heavily on the Crimean Tatar contribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Ukraine 2 Years After Euromaidan
    HUMAN RIGHTS IN UKRAINE 2 YEARS AFTER EUROMAIDAN SIDE EVENT / #HRC32 / 17:00 - 18:00 / 20 JUNE 2016 @ PALAIS DES NATIONS / ROOM XXIV PHOTO: EVGENY FELDMAN A VIEW FROM CIVIL SOCIETY SPEAKERS MODERATOR OLGA SKRYPNYK CHRISTOF HEYNS CRIMEAN HUMAN RIGHTS GROUP ANNA INNOCENTI UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL, HUMAN RIGHTS HOUSE FOUNDATION SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS MARKIYAN HALABALA TETIANA PECHONCHYK EUROMAIDAN VICTIMS LEGAL HUMAN RIGHTS MEDIA MONITORING, REPRESENTATIVE (UKRAINE) Despite the hopes raised by the Euromaidan including the outcomes of the preliminary investigation carried out movement and improvements in many facets of life and by the International Criminal Court. As stated by the UN HRMMU in governance in Ukraine, the last two years have brought its last report to the UN HRC “The lack of progress in these cases undermines public confidence in the criminal justice system. It is the occupation of Crimea, armed conflict in parts of essential that they be promptly addressed with absolute impartiality eastern Ukraine, and ongoing abuses, corruption, and as their mishandling can jeopardize the peaceful resolution of political unrest. Two years after Euromaidan and the disputes and fuel instability.” illegal occupation of Crimea, what efforts have been undertaken to prevent unlawful killings and ensure The event will also be an opportunity to provide information accountability, justice and redress in such cases? on the human rights situation in Crimea and the process of so called “Russianisation”. Crimea, under the control of the Russian The UN Special Rapporteur is invited to present the outcomes of his Federation, is subjected to a hybrid Russian legal system, where laws Mission to Ukraine conducted in September 2015 and to assess the are flexible and local pro-government armed forces act with impunity steps undertaken by the Government of Ukraine to protect the right and where restrictions on public demonstrations, civil society to life and to ensure accountability for committed crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Aggression Against Ukraine: State Responsibility, Individual
    Alexander Antonov University of Southern Denmark, Odense Delivery day: 10th July 2018 Faculty of Business and Social Sciences Number of keystrokes: 191747 Russia’s Aggression Against Ukraine: State Responsibility, Individual Responsibility and Accountability Scrutinizing Ukraine’s Application at the ICJ, Ukraine’s Acceptance of the ICC’s Jurisdiction Pursuant to Art. 12(3) of the Rome Statute and the Role of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in the Context of the Ukraine Crisis Author of the Thesis: Alexander Antonov i Alexander Antonov Summary The majority of legal practitioners and liberal democratic states hold the same opinion: Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its support to the rebels in Eastern Ukraine constituted an act of aggression against the sovereign state of Ukraine. Four years have passed since fighting erupted in Ukrainian regions adjacent to Russia leaving thousands of innocent civilians dead, traumatised or homeless. Families have been torn apart. Despite a vast amount of evidence, Russia has continued to deny the facts that it breached international law by annexing a foreign territory and supporting the so---called Donetsk People’s Republic and Luhansk People’s Republic after the ousting of the former pro---Russian president Viktor Yanukovych at the end of the Maidan revolution in February 2014. Most researchers expounded on the international norms Russia has put at stake and pondered over Russia’s unreasonable legal justifications for its actions in Crimea. The Ukraine crisis has been dealt with extensively both from a political science and legal perspective but only a few scholars discussed the tools international law provide to establish Russia’s responsibility for its wrongful conduct and to hold individuals responsible, suspected of having committed crimes against humanity and war crimes on Ukrainian territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 February to 15 May 2019
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 February to 15 May 2019 Table of Contents: I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 4 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 6 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ........................................................................ 6 B. Economic and social rights .................................................................................................. 9 1. Remedy and reparation to civilian victims ........................................................................ 9 2. Restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ............................... 10 3. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................. 10 4. Freedom of movement ................................................................................................... 11 IV. Right to physical integrity............................................................................................................... 12 A. Access to places of detention ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights
    PART |1| Warning Roma communities about the COVID-19 symptoms and risks and introduction of quarantine restrictions 1 PART 1 SPECIAL REPORT OF THE UKRAINIAN PARLIAMENT COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON ROMA COMMUNITY IN UKRAINE Kyiv - 2020 Special report of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights has been prepared jointly by the Council of Europe Office in Ukraine and the International Charitable Organisation Roma Women Fund “Chiricli” based on the findings of the monitoring visits to Roma-inhabited localities and the oblast state administrations, city, raion and village councils and amalgamated territorial communities aimed at the collection of information regarding the human rights and freedoms of Roma national minorities during the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 caused by SARS-CoV-2. In the event that this document or partial material from this document is reproduced, a reference to this publication must be included. Available at: www.ombudsman.gov.ua. PART |1| Warning Roma communities about the COVID-19 symptoms and risks and introduction of quarantine restrictions 5 PART 1 CONTENTS PART |1| Warning Roma communities about the COVID-19 symptoms and risks and introduction of quarantine restrictions 6 PART 1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 9 FOREWORD BY THE PARLIAMENT COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS 11 Part 1. Warning Roma communities about the COVID-19 15 symptoms and risks and imposed quarantine restrictions Part 2. Numbers of reported COVID-19 cases and tests among Roma 21 Part 3. Access to medical care and individual protective equipment 25 Part 4. Protection of right to labour and access to social services 31 Part 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation in Ukraine
    COMMUNICATION SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE 15 OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT SITUATION IN UKRAINE: WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMMITTED IN PRISONS SEIZED AND CONTROLLED BY ANTI-GOVERNMENT FORCES September 2020 TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ATO Anti-Terrorist Operation CF Correctional Facility DPR Donetsk Peoples’ Republic ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights FIDH International Federation for Human Rights IAC International Armed Conflict ICC International Criminal Court ICTY International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia KHPG Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group LPR Luhansk Peoples’ Republic NIAC Non-International Armed Conflict PTDC Pre Trial Detention Centre SBU Ukrainian State Security UAF Ukrainian Armed Forces The preparation and elaboration of this FIDH-KHPG Communication were made possible thanks to the support of the United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine, International Renaissance Foundation, the European Commission, Open Society Foundations, National Endowment for Democracy (United States), the Democracy Commission of the United States Embassy in Ukraine, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of FIDH and KHPG and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the aforementioned supporting institutions. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of abbreviations 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Executive Summary 6 III. Filing Parties 9 IV. Methodology 12 V. Factual Background 17 A. Outbreak of Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine 17 B. Ukrainian Prisons in Donetsk and Luhansk Provinces Prior 24 to the Outbreak of Armed Conflict C. Impact of the Outbreak of Armed Conflict on Prisoners in 24 Eastern Ukraine D.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report
    “You Don’t Exist” Arbitrary Detentions, Enforced Disappearances, and Torture in Eastern Ukraine HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH “You Don’t Exist” Arbitrary Detentions, Enforced Disappearances, and Torture in Eastern Ukraine Copyright © 2016 Human Rights Watch Copyright © 2016 Amnesty International All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-33863 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org *** Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.amnesty.org JULY 2016 ISBN: 978-1-6231-33863 “You Don’t Exist” Arbitrary Detentions, Enforced Disappearances, and Torture in Eastern Ukraine Map ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]