DOCSLIB.ORG

Aun-Qa Self-Assessment Report at Program Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aun-Qa Self-Assessment Report at Program Level AUN-QA SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT AT PROGRAM LEVEL International Economics Program Faculty of Economics, Maejo University Chiang Mai, Thailand June 2019 1 Table of Contents PART 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Overview of University, Faculty, and Program ...................................................................... 1 Maejo University .................................................................................................................... 1 Faculty of Economics (FEC) .................................................................................................. 2 International Economics Program (IEP) ................................................................................. 3 PART 2 AUN CRITERIONS ................................................................................................. 5 1. Expected Learning Outcomes ............................................................................................. 5 1.1. The expected learning outcomes have been clearly formulated and aligned with the vision and mission of the university ................................................................................ 5 1.2. The expected learning outcomes cover both subject specific and generic learning outcome. ........................................................................................................................ 12 1.3. The expected learning outcome clearly reflect the requirements of the stakeholders ... 13 2. Programme Specification .................................................................................................. 14 2.1. The information in the programme specification is comprehensive and up-to-date ..... 15 2.2. The information in the course specification is comprehensive and up-to-date ............. 16 2.3. The programme and course specifications are communicated and made available to the stakeholders ................................................................................................................... 18 3. Programme structure and content ..................................................................................... 18 3.1. The curriculum is designed based on constructive alignment with the expected learning outcomes ........................................................................................................................ 19 3.2. The contribution made by each course to achieve the expected learning outcomes is clear ............................................................................................................................... 20 3.3. The curriculum is logically structured, sequenced, integrated and up-to-date .............. 21 4. Teaching and Learning Approach ..................................................................................... 23 4.1. The educational philosophy is well articulated and communicated to all stakeholders 23 i 4.2. Teaching and learning activities are constructively aligned to the achievement of the expected learning outcomes .......................................................................................... 25 4.3. Teaching and learning activities enhance life-long learning ......................................... 25 5. Student Assessment .......................................................................................................... 29 5.1. The student assessment is constructively aligned to the achievement of the expected learning outcomes .......................................................................................................... 29 5.2. The student assessments including timelines, methods, regulations, weight distribution, rubrics and grading are explicit and communicated to students ................................... 29 5.3. Methods including assessment rubrics and marking schemes are used to ensure validity, reliability and fairness of student assessment ................................................. 30 5.4. Feedback of student assessment is timely and helps to improve learning ..................... 30 5.5. Students have ready access to appeal procedure ............................................................ 31 6. Academic Staff Quality..................................................................................................... 31 6.1. Academic staff planning is carried out to fulfill the needs for education, research and service ............................................................................................................................ 31 6.2. Staff-to-student ratio and workload are measured and monitored to improve the quality of education, research and service ................................................................................. 33 6.3. Recruitment and selection criteria including ethics and academic freedom for appointment, deployment and promotion are determined and communicated ............. 35 6.4. Competences of academic staff are identified and evaluated ........................................ 36 6.5. Training and developmental needs of academic staff are identified and activities are implemented to fulfill them ........................................................................................... 38 6.6. Performance management including rewards and recognition is implemented to motivate and support education, research and service .................................................. 39 6.7. The types and quantity of research activities by academic staff are established, monitored and benchmarked for improvement ............................................................. 40 7. Support Staff Quality ........................................................................................................ 43 7.1. Support staff planning is carried out to fulfill the needs for education, research and service ............................................................................................................................ 43 ii 7.2. Recruitment and selection criteria for appointment, deployment and promotion are determined and communicated. ..................................................................................... 45 7.3. Competences of support staff are identified and evaluated ........................................... 46 7.4. Training and developmental needs of support staff are identified and activities are implemented to fulfill them ........................................................................................... 47 7.5. Performance management including rewards and recognition is implemented to motivate and support education, research and service .................................................. 48 8. Student Quality and Support ............................................................................................. 48 8.1. The student intake policy and admission criteria are defined, communicated, published, and up-to-date. ............................................................................................................... 48 8.2. The methods and criteria for the selection of students are determined and evaluated .. 50 8.3. There is an adequate monitoring system for student progress, academic performance, and workload ................................................................................................................. 51 8.4. Academic advice, co-curricular activities, student competition, and other student support services are available to improve learning and employability ......................... 55 8.5. The physical, social and psychological environment is conductive for education and research as well as personal well-being ........................................................................ 56 9. Facilities and Infrastructure .............................................................................................. 57 9.1. The teaching and learning facilities and equipment (lecture halls, classroom, project rooms, etc.) are adequate and update to support education and research ...................... 57 9.2. The library and its resources are adequate and updated to support education and research .......................................................................................................................... 58 9.3. The laboratories and equipment are adequate and updated to support education and research .......................................................................................................................... 59 9.4. The IT facilities and equipment are adequate and updated to support education and research .......................................................................................................................... 59 9.5. The standards for environment, health and safety; and access for people with special needs are defined and implemented .............................................................................. 59 10. Quality Enhancement ...................................................................................................... 59 iii 10.1. Stakeholders’ needs and feedback serve as input to curriculum design and development .................................................................................................................. 60 10.2. The curriculum design and development process is established and subjected to evaluation and enhancement ......................................................................................... 60 10.3. The teaching and learning
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of ITP Stakeholders 2017-2018 Educational Institutions
    List of ITP Stakeholders 2017-2018 Educational Institutions 1. American University, School of International Service (SIS) 2. Assumption College 3. Burapha University International College (BUUIC), Chonburi 4. Chaing Mai University, Language Institute, Chiang Mai 5. Chiang Rai Rajabhat University (CRRU), Chiang Rai 6. Chulalongkorn University, Sasin Graduate Institute of Business Administration 7. Connect Institute, Yangon, Myanmar 8. Dusit Thani College 9. Ekamai International School (EIS) 10. Ekawit Business Administration Vocational College (OBAC) 11. Hatyai University, Didyasarin International College 12. International School Bangkok (ISB) 13. International University International School (IUIS), Phnom Penh, Cambodia 14. Kamnoetvidya Science Academy, Rayong 15. Khon Kaen University International College (KKUIC) 16. Khon Kaen University Language Institute (KKULI) 17. King Mongkut's International Demonstration School (KMIDS), Ladkrabang 18. King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology (KMITL), Ladkrabang 19. King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Computer Engineering Department 20. King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), School of Information Technology 21. Kasem Bundit University (KBU) 22. Kasetsart University (KU), Bangkhen, Bangkok 23. Kasetsart University (KU), Kampaeng Saen Campus, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Department of Service Industry and Language Innovation 24. Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang 25. Loei Rajabhat University, Loei 26. Maejo University, Chiang Mai 27. Mahidol University, College of Management (CMMU) 28. Mahidol University, Faculty of Graduate Studies 29. Mahidol University International College (MUIC) 30. Mahidol University International College (MUIC), Pre-College Program 31. Mahidol University International Demonstration School (MUIDS) 32. Mahidol Wittayanusorn School (MWIT) 33. Myanmar Metropolitan College (MMC), Yangon, Myanmar 34. Nakhon Phanom University 35. Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University (NPRU), Language Institute (NPRU) 36.
    [Show full text]
  • Maejo University SDG Report 2020
    Maejo University SDG Report 2020 Sustainable Development Report 2020 I 1 Contents 03 05 17 22 25 President’s Message No Poverty Zero Hunger Good Health and Well- Quality Education Being 28 30 34 40 42 Gender Equality Clean Water and Affordable and Decent Work and Industrial Innovation Sanitation Clean Energy Economic Growth and Infrastructure 44 46 48 50 53 Reduced Sustainable Cities and Responsible Consumption Climate Action Life Below Water Inequalities Communities and Production 56 64 67 73 74 Life on Land Peace, Justice and Partnerships for the About the Report University Impact Strong Institutions Goals Rankings for the SDGs 2 President’s Message Key role of Maejo University during the crisis of COVID-19 pandemic in the previous two years up to the present is to cope up with various problems disrupting university development. Nevertheless, this dramatic crisis makes us unite to make a dream come true and overcome these obstacles. One achievement which we are proud of Maejo University is the result of the world university ranking by Times Higher Education Impact Ranking of the year 2021. This is on the basis of roles of the university under Sustainable Development Goals: SDGs, and Maejo University is ranked in the range 301- 400 in the world (Ranked fifth of the country). Notably, Maejo University ranks 39th in the world in terms of the contribution to push forward hunger-poverty alleviation, food security, and nutrition of people of all ages. On behalf of the President of Maejo University, I am genuinely grateful to all university executives, personnel, students, and alumni for the glorious success of the country's excellence in agriculture university.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Green University's Curriculum of Maejo
    Social Science Asia journal Volume 4 Number 3, p: 44-55 The development of Green University’s Curriculum of Maejo University –Chumphon Phatthanakan Tiapibool* ,Boonsin Jittapraphan** and Chondarong Tongsong*** Abstract A sustainable social development requires education as a mechanism for operation. Education is used as a tool for sustainable development. There are three major components for this mechanism: 1). The curriculum is the knowledge to create wisdom in solving family and community problems, it will be the basis for creation of new knowledge and knowledge from the change of the current world; 2). Teachers or professionals should be a good model for learners to have analytical thinking and attempt to improve themselves for their future. 3). And the goal must follows the university guidelines. Therefore, the curriculum development for Green University of Maejo University at Chumphon focuses on sustainable development of education according to the strategy of Maejo University and the vision of Maejo University at Chumphon which is outcome -based education (OBE). It is necessary to create a network and link to departments, and organizations involving with environment, economic, society, have an education administration in practice, and more cooperate with agencies, especially, the content knowledge for education. Focusing on educational management is to develop, and to give opportunity for everyone to participate and realize of problems and needs of locals and communities in order to improve learners with participating process according to the Thai social context for sustainable development. The awareness of climate change has become the pressure issue of the world society in all organizations to take more responsibility on environment.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Tsukuba CRICED Our Partner Institutions in Thailand In
    University of Tsukuba Center for Research on International Cooperation in Educational Development (CRICED) Khon Kaen Office (hosted by Khon Kaen University) 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Nai-Muang, Muang District, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand http://www.tsukuba.ac.jp/en/ http://www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/en/ CRICED University of Tsukuba The Center for Research on International Years of 1973 University of Tsukuba CRICED Cooperation in Educational Development 147 History and Tradition 1949 Tokyo University of Education University of Tsukuba is the only university member in Japan for the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education 1872 Founded as Higher Normal School Organization (SEAMEO)*. ⚫ A leading national research-oriented university spearheading *SEAMEO is a regional intergovernmental organization collaborations across organizational, industrial and national borders established in 1965 among governments of Southeast Asian countries to promote regional cooperation in ⚫ Relocated in 1973 from Tokyo to Tsukuba Science City, Japan’s education, science and culture in the region. premier science hub ⚫ Its founding philosophies of CRICED has a Khon Kaen Office in fostering transdisciplinary the premises of KKU’s Institute for research and education and Research and Development in Teaching Profession (IRDTP) for being open to society are more ASEAN. important than ever in today’s environment of accelerating KKU acts as a logistic hub of the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) complexity and interconnectivity. counties. We have been collaborating using the geographical
    [Show full text]
  • Recruitment Guide for Thailand. INSTITUTION Institute of International Education/Southeast Asia, Bangkok (Thailand).; Citibank, N.A., Bangkok (Thailand)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 421 071 HE 031 416 AUTHOR Yoshihara, Shoko, Comp. TITLE Recruitment Guide for Thailand. INSTITUTION Institute of International Education/Southeast Asia, Bangkok (Thailand).; Citibank, N.A., Bangkok (Thailand). ISBN ISBN-0-87206-245-7 PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 148p. AVAILABLE FROM Institute of International Education/Southeast Asia, Citibank Tower, 9th Floor, 82 North Sathorn Road, Bangkok 10500 Thailand. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS College Admission; Cultural Influences; Foreign Countries; *Foreign Students; Higher Education; Student Characteristics; *Student Recruitment IDENTIFIERS *Thailand ABSTRACT This book is intended to provide U.S. university recruiters with information on higher education and student recruitment opportunities in Thailand. Section A describes recruitment strategies that are professionally and culturally appropriate to Thailand; contact information concerning related institutions is also included. A subsection called "What Thai Students Are Like" identifies the basic characteristics of Thai students. Section B offers detailed information on the development and present situation of higher education in Thailand. Directories of public/private universities and the addresses of related government ministries are included. Finally, in Section C, a basic country profile of Thailand covers such aspects as history, religion, and the language. Attachments to each section provide relevant addresses. Tables provide information on the academic calendar,
    [Show full text]
  • Suranaree University of Technology Rajamangala University Of
    TH Rank World Rank University 1 310 Kasetsart University 2 388 Chulalongkorn University 3 392 Prince of Songkla University 4 481 Mahidol University 5 505 Chiang Mai University 6 619 Khon Kaen University 7 752 Thammasat University 8 829 Asian Institute of Technology Thailand 9 947 Burapha University 10 982 King Mongkut´s University of Technology Thonburi 11 988 Naresuan University ( Total=38,463 Pisanulok=26,679 , Payao=11,784) 12 1087 King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang 13 1190 Srinakharinwirot University 14 1232 Suranaree University of Technology 15 1322 Assumption University of Thailand 16 1455 Ramkhamhaeng University 17 1500 Silpakorn University 18 1618 Mahasarakham University 19 1640 Sripatum University 20 1714 King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok 21 1720 Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna 22 1727 University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce 23 1797 National Institute of Development Administration 24 1866 Ubonratchathani University 25 1943 Bangkok University 26 2165 Maejo University 27 2173 Suan Dusit Rajabhat University 28 2314 Walailak University 29 2405 Mae Fah Luang University 30 2477 Rangsit University 31 2522 Rajabhat Institute Chandrakasem 32 2605 Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University 33 2761 Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University 34 2779 Mahanakorn University of Technology 35 2932 Dhurakijpundit University 36 2999 Payap University 37 3034 Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon 38 3118 Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University 39 3148 Thaksin University 40 3185 Mahamakut Buddhist University
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on TOMATO BREEDER's ROUNDTABLE 2013 February 6-8, 2013 Shangri La, Chiang Mai, Thailand
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOMATO BREEDER'S ROUNDTABLE 2013 February 6-8, 2013 Shangri La, Chiang Mai, Thailand OFFICIAL LIST OF DELEGATES No. FIRST NAME LAST NAME ORGANIZATION EMAIL COUNTRY 1 ABDELHAFID BENDAHMANE INRA-URGV [email protected] FRANCE 2 ALLEN NGUYEN LIFE TECHNOLOGIES [email protected] USA 3 ANAND NARASIMAHAN NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT LTD [email protected] INDIA 4 ANGSANA ANGKARAPISARN CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY [email protected] THAILAND 5 ANJANA BHUNCHOTH NATIONAL CENTER FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY [email protected] THAILAND 6 ANSA CLAASSEN STARKE AYRES SEED PTY LTD [email protected] SOUTH AFRICA 7 ANUSART YUTTASINSAEWEE MAEJO UNIVERSITY [email protected] THAILAND 8 ANUTIDA TAEPA CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY [email protected] THAILAND 9 ASEP HARPENAS GOENARI PT EAST WEST SEED INDONESIA [email protected] INDONESIA 10 ASSAF EYBISHITZ TOMATECH ISRAEL [email protected] ISRAEL 11 AUDREY DARRIGUES HM.CLAUSE [email protected] FRANCE 12 AUNG KO KO MAS, GOVERNMENT MYANMAR 13 BALARAM VENKATAPPA MYSORE NUNHEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [email protected] INDIA 14 BEN VANDERKNAAP FUTURES CONSULTANCY [email protected] NETHERLANDS 15 BENCHARONG PHUANGRAT NATIONAL CENTER FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY [email protected] THAILAND 16 BOONANAND BUALOILOM EAST WEST SEED LTD. [email protected] THAILAND 17 BOONSONG EKPONG UBON RATCHATHANI UNIVERSITY [email protected] THAILAND 18 BRAJESH KISHOR TRIPATHI NUZIVEEDU SEEDS PVT.LTD. [email protected] INDIA 19 CAICHENG HUANG KEYGENE N.V [email protected] NETHERLANDS 20 CALEB ORCHARD OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY [email protected] USA 21 CEES SCHUIT BEJO ZADEN B V [email protected] NETHERLANDS 22 CHAIPRUEK TEPWONG MAEJO UNIVERSITY [email protected] THAILAND 23 CHANNARONG SEEPIBAN NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY [email protected] THAILAND 24 CHANTARAWIPA THANASOBHON EAST WEST SEED LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release +49 851 509 1439
    University Executive Communication and Marketing Division From Katrina Jordan Press release +49 851 509 1439 Fax +49 851 509 1433 E-mail communication @uni-passau.de Date 15 June 2018 Deputy Consul General of Thailand visits the University The Deputy Consul General of Thailand, Kamrob Palwatwichai, visited the University of Passau to get a first-hand glimpse of the Thai-German activities of the University. The Deputy Consul General was welcomed by University President Carola Jungwirth, Vice President for Quality Management and Diversity Professor Jörg Fedtke, Vice President for Study, Teaching and International Matters Professor Daniela Wawra, Professor Rüdiger Korff (Chair of Southeast Asian Studies), Professor Ursula Reutner (Chair of Romance Languages and Cultures and Academic Director of the Language Centre) and Dr Michael de Jong (General Manager of the Language Centre). Mr Palawatwichai informed himself of the current cooperative projects in research and teaching as well as opportunities for the University to further strengthen ties to universities and other institutions in Thailand. During the visit, Vice President Wawra introduced the University's European Studies and International Cultural and Business Studies degree programmes. Another degree programme with a strong Southeast Asian Studies focus is the M.A. Development Studies, on which Professor Korff gave a presentation. This was followed by a presentation on the work of the Language Centre, delivered by Professor Reutner and Dr de Jong. The Language Centre teaches Thai at six proficiency levels; all Thai language courses naturally also teach students about Thai culture. Vice President Fedtke also presented the German-Southeast Asian Center of Excellence for Public Policy and Good Governance of Thammasat University Bangkok, in which the Faculty of Law of the University of Passau is involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Maintenance in Lanna (Northern Thai)
    PHATTHARATHANIT Srichomthong. 2012. Identity Maintenance in Lanna (Northern Thai). Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (JSEALS) 5:67-84 Received 31/8/2011, revised text accepted 20/4/2012, published 1/7/2012 ISSN: 1836-6821 | Website: http://jseals.org | Managing Editor Dr Paul Sidwell URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9144 Copyright vested in the author; released under Creative Commons Attribution Licence www.jseals.org | Volume 5 | 2012 | Asia-Pacific Linguistics IDENTITY MAINTENANCE IN LANNA (NORTHERN THAI) PHATTHARATHANIT Srichomthong Faculty of Liberal Arts, Maejo University, Thailand <[email protected]> Abstract The identity of the Lanna people in northern Thailand is remarkably maintained through the northern language “Kam Mueang” in a context of cultural hybridity. This study was conducted in Chiang Mai, known as the capital of Lanna to investigate the maintenance of Lanna identity through the use of Kam Mueang words on signage. Signage of any possible forms in public, composed with words from single to large strings either permanent or contemporary, especially on the side roads was collected as data used in this study. Four pattern repertoires of signage are found including signs in foreign languages, signs in different mixed languages, signs in Thai only, and signs in Kam Mueang, mixed and non-mixed, respectively. Five Kam Mueang words including “Mueang”, “Huean”, “Doi”, “Kat”, and “Kham” on signs in public spaces reflect identity maintenance of Lanna people. Kam Mueang in public signage though found at a low rate compared to the frequency of all utterances types, currently and remarkably displays salient phenomenon of social identity. Key words: identity, maintenance, Northern Thai ISO 639-3 language codes: nod 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Perspective Evaluating Service Sectors’S Strategies of the Thai Government in the Deep South of Thailand
    EDUCATION PERSPECTIVE EVALUATING SERVICE SECTORS’S STRATEGIES OF THE THAI GOVERNMENT IN THE DEEP SOUTH OF THAILAND Chumphon Kaewsom Head of political science program (International Studies). Maejo University at Chumphon, Thailand. E-mail Address: [email protected] Abstract: This study examines and analyzes the educational strategies pursued by the Thai government in Thailand with particular focus in the Deep South of the country. Its approach is primarily an eclectic, by concentrating on the strengths and weaknesses of the educational strategies as pursued by Thailand. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part looks at the role of education in resolving the conflict in the region. The second part looks at the integration of Pondok/Islamic educational system into Thai educational system. The third part looks at the Thai government’s effort in rebuilding education in the conflict- affected Area. The fourth looks at the bridging education with peace. The last part looks at the effectiveness/efficiency of the Bangkok government’s educational strategies. The data for this study were collected from both primary and secondary sources and analyzed using qualitative method. The primary sources include documents, SBPAC’s annual reports and press release. In addition, the researcher analyzed the outputs of the SBPAC policy-makers relating to the research topic such as speeches, official correspondences and decisions of the organization relating to the management of the conflict in the Deep South. Interviews with knowledgeable people, prominent political and/or religious leaders, key stakeholders as well as the Thai officials 150 Education Perspective Evaluating Service Sectors’s Strategies were also conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • International WS International Workshop on Ecological
    80 List of Participants 1. Participant: Dr. Abd Rahman bin Kassim ; Address: Geoinformation Programme, Forestry and Environment Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia , Kepong 52109 Selangor Malasia Email: [email protected] 2. Participant: Miss Aingorn Chaiyes Address: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Pakkred, Nonthaburi, 11120 Thailand Email: [email protected] 3. Participant: Miss Arerut Yarnvudhi Address: Center for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University-Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900 Thailand Email: [email protected] 4. Participant: Miss Atchara Jingjai Address: Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900 Thailand Email: [email protected] 5. Participant: Prof. Dr. Atsushi Ishida Address: Center for Ecological Research Kyoto University, Shiga 520-2113 Japan Email: [email protected] 6. Participant: Dr. Chongrak Wachrinrat: Address: Center for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University-Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900 Thailand Email: [email protected] 7. Participant: Dr.Damrong Sripraram Address: Faculty of forestry, Kasetsart University Thailand Email: [email protected] 8. Participant: Assoc.Prof. Dokrak Marod Address: Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand Email: [email protected] 81 9. Participant: Asst.Prof. Dr. Hirokawa Kurokawa Address: Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan Email: [email protected] 10. Participant: Dr. Hiroshi Tanaka Address: Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba 305-8687 Japan Email: [email protected] 11. Participant: Mr.Jakkaphong Thongsawi Address: Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900 Thailand 12. Participant: Miss Itsaree Howpinjai Address: Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900 Thailand Email: [email protected] 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Universities in Thailand
    Top Universities in Thailand Introduction What are the most popular Universities in Thailand? uniRank tries to answer this question by publishing the 2018 Thai University Ranking of 124 recognized Thai higher-education institutions meeting the following uniRank selection criteria: being chartered, licensed and/or accredited by the appropriate Thai higher education-related organization (/institutions/th/) offering at least four-year undergraduate degrees (bachelor degrees) or postgraduate degrees (master or doctoral degrees) delivering courses predominantly in a traditional, face-to-face, non-distance education format Our aim is to provide a non-academic League Table of the top Thai Universities based on valid, unbiased and non- influenceable web metrics provided by independent web intelligence sources rather than data submitted by the Universities themselves. 2018 League Table sort by: rank (/th/) a-z (/th/a-z/) town (/th/town/) oldest (/th/oldest/) filter by: public (/th/public/) private (/th/private/) non-profit (/th/non-profit/) for-profit (/th/for-profit/) # (/th/) University (/th/a-z/) Town (/th/town/) 1 Mahidol University (/reviews/4494.htm) Nakhon Pathom 2 Kasetsart University (/reviews/4483.htm) Bangkok 3 Chulalongkorn University (/reviews/4478.htm) Bangkok 4 Prince of Songkla University (/reviews/4500.htm) Hat Yai ... 5 Chiang Mai University (/reviews/4477.htm) Chiang Mai 6 Burapha University (/reviews/4476.htm) Chonburi 7 Thammasat University (/reviews/4514.htm) Bangkok 8 Khon Kaen University (/reviews/4484.htm) Khon Kaen ... 9 Naresuan University (/reviews/4496.htm) Phitsanulok ... 10 King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (/reviews/4487.htm) Bangkok ... 11 Suranaree University of Technology (/reviews/4512.htm) Nakhon Ratchasima 12 King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok (/reviews/4486.htm) Bangkok ..
    [Show full text]