Lateral-Directional Stability 6.7 Dynamic Lateral-Directional Stability 6.10 Stability and Control Analysis Example: F-16A and F-16C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lateral-Directional Stability 6.7 Dynamic Lateral-Directional Stability 6.10 Stability and Control Analysis Example: F-16A and F-16C AE317 Aircraft Flight Mechanics & Performance UNIT D: Stability and Control Brandt, et.al., Introduction to Aeronautics: ROAD MAP . A Design Perspective Chapter 6: Stability and Control 6.6 Lateral-Directional Stability 6.7 Dynamic Lateral-Directional Stability 6.10 Stability and Control Analysis Example: F-16A and F-16C D-1: Longitudinal Stability & Control D-2: Lateral-Directional Stability Unit D-2: List of Subjects Static Directional Stability Static Lateral Stability Dynamic Lateral-Directional Stability F-16 Stability & Control Analysis Page 2 of 10 Unit D-2 Static Directional Stability Lateral (Rolling) and Directional (Yawing) Stability Analysis • Longitudinal (three DOF) stability analysis: x and z translation and longitudinal rotation (pitching about y axis) has been done in Unit D-1. • Another 3DOF stability analysis: lateral rotation (rolling about the x axis) and directional rotation (yawing about z axis), as well as y translation, needs to be done for complete aircraft stability and control analysis. Sideslip Angle • Instead of angle of attack for longitudinal stability analysis, the sideslip angle plays important role for lateral & directional stability analysis. • When an aircraft with good stability yaws, it generates rolling and yawing moments that tend to return back to equilibrium. These are called, positive lateral (rolling) and directional (yawing) stability, respectively. Static Directional (Yawing) Stability • Positive static directional stability requires that an aircraft, when is positive, generate a right-hand or positive moment around the z axis to reduce back to zero. This is usually achieved by a vertical stabilizer. Defining the yawing moment coefficient: C= N q Sb and slope: CC= , N ( ) NN the criterion for positive directional stability is: C 0 . N Page 3 of 10 Unit D-2 Static Lateral Stability (1) Static Lateral (Rolling) Stability • The requirement for positive static lateral stability is that an aircraft roll away from a sideslip. In other words, if an aircraft with positive static lateral stability is sideslipping to the right, so that is positive, then it will generate a moment that will cause it to roll to the left. • Because the positive direction for rolling about the x axis is to the right, an aircraft with positive static lateral stability will produce a negative rolling moment when its sideslip angle is positive. • Defining the rolling moment coefficient C= L q Sb and slope: CC= , the criterion for L ( ) LL positive static lateral stability is: C 0 . L Effects of Wing Sweep and Aspect Ratio • When the aircraft is yawed so that it has a positive sideslip angle (fig. 6.18), its right wing is less swept (more lift) relative to its velocity vector than its left wing: the aircraft will roll left. • Another way to look at it, is that the right wing has a higher aspect ratio than the left wing (higher lift-curve slope, fig. 6.22): the aircraft will roll left. • Note that the effect of wing sweep on C increases as angle of attack and lift on the wings increase. L • Also, the effect goes away when the wing is making zero lift. This is important for an aircraft that must make vertical climbs, where lift is zero (roll caused by sideslip is undesirable, because if the aircraft yaws the resulting roll will cause the airplane to make a "corkscrew" type flight path). Page 4 of 10 Unit D-2 Static Lateral Stability (2) Wing Placement on the Fuselage • Fig. 6.23 shows crossflow (sideways component of airflow) around three sideslipping fuselages with a wing attached at a different vertical position. (a) High wing: gets an upward crossflow component on its upwind wing and downward component on its downwind wing (roll "away" from the sideslip: contribute to positive lateral stability) (b) Mid wing: gets no effect (no net rolling moment and neutral lateral stability) (c) Low wing: opposite of high wing (roll "toward" the sideslip: contribute to negative stability) Wing Dihedral Effects • In fig. 6.24, the wing dihedral angle is the angle in a rear view of the aircraft between its y axis and a line drawn from the middle of the wing root to the middle of the wing tip. (a) Positive dihedral: positive sideslip angle results in a negative (roll "away") rolling moment (contribute to positive lateral stability) (b) Negative dihedral: opposite (roll "toward") rolling: contribute to negative lateral stability) Tall Vertical Tail Contributions • In fig. 6.25, it shows that a tall vertical tail contributes to positive lateral stability. Because its aerodynamic center is above the aircraft's center of gravity, it generates a negative rolling moment when the aircraft has a positive sideslip angle. This is a positive contribution to lateral stability. • In addition, placing an aircraft's horizontal tail on top of its vertical tail (T-tail) will create an effect of an end-plate on the vertical tail. This will increase the effective aspect ratio of the vertical tail, and therefore increase its lift curve slope. This will also make the aircraft's rolling moment (due to sideslip) more negative (contribute to positive lateral stability). Page 5 of 10 Unit D-2 Dynamic Lateral-Directional Stability Three Modes of Dynamic Lateral & Directional Stability • Most aircraft exhibit three distinctive dynamic lateral-directional modes: spiral, Dutch roll, and roll modes. Each mode has unique characteristics, and each is influenced in different ways by the same aircraft features that contribute to static lateral and directional stability. Spiral Mode • The spiral mode typically involves a gradual increase in bank angle, causing the aircraft to make a descending turn. As bank angle increases, the aircraft's node drops father below the horizon, and its speed increases (death spiral). • The requirement for positive spiral mode stability is that an aircraft, when disturbed (rolling) from wings-level flight, should generate a moment that tends to return it to wings level. • If CC 23, the aircraft's static directional stability turns it into the direction it is slipping, NL reducing the yaw and preventing its lateral stability from rolling it out of the turn. In this situation, the aircraft often has a very dangerous (divergent) spiral mode. • To correct this situation: increase dihedral and/or sweep, or mount the wing higher on the fuselage to increase C . Alternatively: reduce the size (but not the height) of the vertical tail, or move it closer L to the aircraft's center of gravity to reduce C . N Page 6 of 10 Unit D-2 Dynamic Lateral-Directional Stability (Continued) Dutch Roll Mode • If CC13, an aircraft's lateral stability is out of balance with and overpowers its directional NL stability. When a disturbance causes aircraft to yaw, its powerful lateral stability causes it to roll away from the yaw before its directional stability can turn it into the sideslip. This triggers an oscillating rolling and yawing maneuver (side-to-side rolling motion). Because of its motion, the name came from a famous Dutch ice skater of the time. • The period of Dutch roll can be shorter than the pilot's reaction time (difficult to correct). • To correct this situation: decrease dihedral and/or sweep, or mount the wing lower on the fuselage to decrease . Alternatively: increase the size (and reduce the height) of the vertical tail, or move it farther away from the aircraft's center of gravity to increase . Roll Mode • The roll mode is the aircraft's response to aileron inputs. When the pilot deflects ailerons, the resulting rolling moment causes the aircraft to begin to roll. As the roll rate increases, the motion of the wings causes an additional relative wind component that increases the angle of attack on the down-going wing and decreases it on the up-going wing. This, in turn, creates a moment opposite the rolling moment created by the ailerons, which gradually builds until the aircraft reaches a steady roll rate. • The roll rate (sensitivity) can be adjusted by changing the size of control surfaces (control authority) and/or software changes of fly-by-wire flight control system. Adverse Yaw and Spins • Part of the roll mode is a yaw response that is caused by differential drag on the two wings. The wing with the aileron deflected trailing-edge-down creates more lift than the one with the aileron deflected up. This, in turn, creates more drag on the wing with the greater lift. If the wings are long (i.e., sailplane), this differential drag can create a powerful yawing moment away from the direction of the roll. This is called an adverse yaw. • At best, the adverse yaw can delay the turn; at worst (if at high angle of attack near stall), it can push the aircraft into a rotating stalled condition, called a spin. • To reduce adverse yaw: use differential ailerons that deflect trailing edge up much more than they deflect trailing edge down. This works because the trailing-edge-up deflection is so extreme that it causes flow separation and additional drag to balance the additional drag due to lift of the opposite trailing-edge-down aileron. C L C N Page 7 of 10 Unit D-2 F-16 Stability & Control Analysis (1) Stability & Control Analysis Example: F-16A & F-16C Fig. 6.27 illustrates F-16A (early model) and F-16C (later model): the difference is the stabilator. The increase in stabilator area was made for F-16 to increase pitch control authority. Table 6.3 lists descriptive data for each aircraft. Determine the effect of this change on the F-16's neutral point location and SM, for both subsonic and supersonic flight. F-16 Subsonic Flight Analysis The stability analysis begins by estimating the location of the aerodynamic center of the wing/strake/fuselage combination, which will be the same for both aircraft.
Recommended publications
  • Vistara Soars Toward Expansion New Flight-Planning Technology Enhances Safety, Cuts Costs
    MOBILITY ENGINEERINGTM AUTOMOTIVE, AEROSPACE, OFF-HIGHWAY A quarterly publication of and Vistara soars toward expansion New flight-planning technology enhances safety, cuts costs Base-engine value engineering Deriving optimum efficiency, performance Autos & The Internet of Things How the IoT is disrupting the auto industry Software’s expanding role Escalating software volumes shifting design, systems integration Volume 3, Issue 2 June 2016 ME Molex Ad 0616.qxp_Mobility FP 4/28/16 5:00 PM Page 1 Support Tomorrow’s Speeds with Proven Connectivity Simply Solved In Automotive, consumer demand is changing even faster than technology. When you collaborate with Molex, we can develop a complete solution that will support tomorrow’s data speeds, backed by proven performance. Together, we can simplify your design and manufacturing processes — while minimizing space and maximizing connectivity throughout the vehicle. www.molex.com/a/connectedvehicle/in CONTENTS Features 40 Base-engine value engineering 49 Agility training for cars for higher fuel efficiency and AUTOMOTIVE CHASSIS enhanced performance Chassis component suppliers refine vehicle dynamics at AUTOMOTIVE POWERTRAIN the high end and entry level with four-wheel steering and adaptive damping. Continuous improvement in existing engines can be efficiently achieved with a value engineering approach. The integration of product development with value 52 Evaluating thermal design of engineering ensures the achievement of specified targets construction vehicles in a systematic manner and within a defined timeframe. OFF-HIGHWAY SIMULATION CFD simulation is used to evaluate two critical areas that 43 Integrated system engineering address challenging thermal issues: electronic control units for valvetrain design and and hot-air recirculation. development of a high-speed diesel engine AUTOMOTIVE POWERTRAIN The lead time for engine development has reduced significantly with the advent of advanced simulation Cover techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11) Patent Number: 4,691,879 Greene 45) Date of Patent: Sep
    United States Patent (19) 11) Patent Number: 4,691,879 Greene 45) Date of Patent: Sep. 8, 1987 54 JET AIRPLANE gravity. Full control of the airplane is possible under 76 Inventor: Vibert F. Greene, 19400 Sorenson high maneuverability conditions, extremely high accel Ave., Cupertino, Calif. 95014 erations and at large angles of attack. The delta nose wing creates swirling vortices that contribute substan 21 Appl. No.: 875,024 tially to the lift of the nose section. The winglet, an 22). Filed: Jun. 16, 1986 extension of the delta nose wing, allows the turbulent wake from the leading edge of the delta nose wing to 51 Int. Cl." .............................................. B64C39/08 flow over its upper surface to create additional lift while 52 U.S.C. .................................... 244/45 R; 24.4/13; the midspan wing causes the turbulent flow over its 244/45 A; 244/15 upper surface to form a turbulent wake at its leading 58 Field of Search .................. 244/45 R, 45 A, 4 R, edge. The V-tail delta wing with a V-shaped underside 244/15, 13 and blunt leading edge gives additional lift and control (56) References Cited to the airplane. A flow regulator helps to direct and U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS control the flow field to the underside of the delta nose D. 138,538 8/1944 Clerc .................................. D12/331 wing and nose strake. There are eight pairs of control D. 155,569 10/1949 Bailey ............ ... D12/331 surfaces including an upper body stabilizer system for 3,447,76 6/1969 Whitener et al. ..................... 244/5 the control and stability of the airplane.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Tunnel and Analytical Investigation of the Effect of Strake
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19800019803 2020-03-21T17:02:56+00:00Z NASA TP " 1676 NASA Technical Paper 1676 ,.,I c. 1 Water-Tunneland Analytical Investigation of the Effect of Strake Design Variables on Strake VortexBreakdown. Characteristics Neal T. Frink and John E. Lamar AUGUST 1980 TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM NASA Technical Paper 1676 Water-Tunnel andAnalytical Investigation of the Effect of Strake Design Variables on Strake VortexBreakdown Characteristics Neal T. Frink andJohn E. Lamar Lavzgley Research Cetzter Haznptorz, Virgivzia National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1980 SUMMARY A systematic water tunnel study was made to determine the vortex breakdown characteristics of43 strakes, more than half of which were generated from a new analytical strake design method. The strakes were mountedon a l/2-scale model of a Langley Research Center general research fighter fuselage mode1 with a 44O leading-edge-sweep trapezoidal wing. This study develops, in conjunction with a common wing-body, a parametric set of strake data for use in establishing and verifying a new strake design procedure. To develop this parametric data base, several series of isolated strakes were designedon the basis of a simplified approach which relates pre- scribed suction and pressure distributions in a simplified flow field to plan- form shapes. The resulting planform shapes provided examples of the effects of the pri- mary design parameters of size, span, and slenderness on the vortex breakdown characteristics. These effects are analyzed in relation to the respective strake leading-edge suction distributions. Included are examples of the effects of detailed strake planform shaping for strakes with the same general size and slenderness.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 INVENTOR 16%/6/S G
    May 21, 1968 F. G., NEUBECK 3,384,326 AERODYNAMIC STRAKE Filed Aug. 24, 1965 - E - - 4 INVENTOR 16%/6/s G. MazMayaea ... it is ATTORNEYsa 3,384,326 United States Patent Office Patented May 21, 1968 1. 2 bination of parts involved in the embodiment of the inven 3,384,326 tion as will appear from the following description and AERODYNAMC STRAKE accompanying drawings, wherein: Francis G. Neubeck, Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. FIG. 1 is a front elevation of the airplane showing the (94.67 Somerset Lane, Cypress, Calif. 90630) 5 angular relationship of the strakes in relation to the ver Filed Aug. 24, 1965, Ser. No. 482,304 tical axis of the airplane; 1 Claim. (CI. 244-13) FIG. 2 is a side elevation of the airplane showing the longitudinal position of a strake; FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of the rear portion of FIG. ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE 2, and showing with greater clarity the relationship be An elongated aerodynamic strake for use on an air 0 tween the aerodynamic strake and well-known airplane plane, and being in the form of a pentahedral prominence elements; and in plan and joined to and extending from each lower FIG. 4 is an enlarged plan view of the strake only. quarter aft section of the fuselage between the trailing The aerodynamic strake 10, constituting this invention, edge of the wing and the leading edge of the horizontal 5 is joined to the exterior of the fuselage skin on airplane stabilizer to be in the upwash area for improving overall 12, as shown on FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Design of the Strake for the Rocket Plane in Tailless Configuration
    AERODYNAMIC DESIGN OF THE STRAKE FOR THE ROCKET PLANE IN TAILLESS CONFIGURATION. M. Figat, A. Kwiek, K. Seneńko Warsaw University of Technology Keywords: Optimization, gradient method, strake, CFD Abstract of the MAS. Moreover, the Rocket Plane is able The paper presents results of the to fly at high angles of attack. It is assumed that, aerodynamic design of the Rocket Plane in a it should be equipped with a strake. tailless configuration. It is part of a Modular Airplane System - MAS. The system is devoted to the space tourism and the Rocket Plane is the main component of the system. The main goal of the research was improving aerodynamic characteristic of the Rocket Plane. The paper presents the proposal of modification of the initial Rocket Plane geometry which is being results from the optimization process. The final geometry of the Rocket Plane is resulting of a number of optimization. 1 Introduction Fig. 1 Concept of the MAS Space tourism is a very promising and fast developing branch of an aerospace technology The mission profile of the MAS is [1]. Especially the idea of suborbital tourist presented in Fig. 2. The mission profile of the flights is a very promising concept. The main MAS consists of the following five main advantage of this type of flights is a lower price phases: [1] compare to a tourist visit on the International Take-off Space Station. During a suborbital flight the Objects separation boundary between the Earth’s atmosphere and outer space is crossed, zero gravity condition Climbing and ballistic flight appears due to parabolic trajectory.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Wing Planform and Canard Location and Geometry on the of a Close-Coupled Canard Wing
    AND NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-7910 o-J WING PLANFORM N75-23514 -- (NASA-TN-D-7910)- EFFECT OF AND CANARD LOCATION AND GEOMETRY ON THE LONGITUDINAL AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A CLOSE-COUPLED CANARD WING MODEL AT Unclas 1/02 23802 SUBSONIC SPEEDS (NASA) 86 pHC $.7,5 EFFECT OF WING PLANFORM AND CANARD LOCATION AND GEOMETRY ON THE LONGITUDINAL AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A CLOSE-COUPLED CANARD WING MO[ AT SUBSONIC SPEEDS Blair B. Gloss C; .LT Langley Research Center 0T, Hampton, Va. 23665 16 .191 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION * WASHINGTON,-D. * JUNE 1975 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TN D-7910 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date EFFECT OF WING PLANFORM AND CANARD LOCATION June 1975 AND GEOMETRY ON THE LONGITUDINAL AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A CLOSE-COUPLED CANARD WING MODEL AT SUBSONIC SPEEDS 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. L-9987 Blair B. Gloss 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 505-11-21-02 NASA Langley Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No. Hampton, Va. 23665 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Note National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20546 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract A generalized wind-tunnel model with canard and wing planforms typical of highly maneu- verable aircraft was tested in the Langley 7- by 10-foot high-speed tunnel at a Mach number of 0.30 to determine the effect of canard location, canard size, wing sweep, and canard strake on canard-wing interference to high angles of attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Aiaa-98-4448 Application of Forebody Strakes For
    AIAA-98-4448 APPLICATION OF FOREBODY STRAKES FOR DIRECTIONAL STABILITY AND CONTROL OF TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT Gautam H. Shah* NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA J. Nijel Grandat The Boeing Company Long Beach, CA ABSTRACT during take-off, or high-crosswind landings. The resulting requirement for large vertical fin and rudder A brief overview of a cooperative area can exact a large cruise drag penalty, with an NASNBoeing research effort, Strake Technology associated increase in fuel cost. Therefore, alternate Research Application to Transport Aircraft (STRATA), methods which can provide the required directional intended to explore the potential of applying forebody stability and control during such critical situations strake technology to transport aircraft configurations for without resorting to large vertical taihdder area would directional stability and control at low angles of attack, be of great interest to aircraft manufacturers. is presented. As an initial step in the STRATA The use of forebody strakes for directional program, an exploratory wind-tunnel investigation of control of high-performance aircraft at high angles of the effect of fixed forebody strakes on the directional attack has been studied for quite some time, including stability and control characteristics of a generic transport ground and flight testing within NASA's High-Angle- configuration was conducted in the NASA Langley 12- of-Attack Technology Program (HATP). At high Foot Low-Speed Wind Tunnel. Results of parametric angles of attack (typically, a > 30"), crossflow on the variations in strake chord and span, as well as the effect forebody is substantial, and altering that flowfield can of strake incidence, are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Description
    TTEECCHHNNIICCAALL DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONN MMDD 990022 EEXXPPLLOORREERR MD Helicopters, Inc. Sales and Marketing 4555 E. McDowell Rd. Mesa, AZ 85215 PH: 480.346.6474 FAX: 480.346.6339 www.mdhelicopters.com [email protected] MISSION PROVEN, CHALLENGE READY THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION MD 902 EXPLORER MD Helicopters, Inc. 4555 E. McDowell Rd Mesa, Arizona CAGE: 1KVX4 DUNS: 054313767 www.mdhelicopters.com This Technical Description includes information and intellectual property that is the property of MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI). It provides general information for evaluation of the design, equipment, and performance of the MD 902 helicopter. The information presented in this Technical Description does not constitute an offer and is subject to change without notice. This proprietary information, in its entirety, shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed—directly or indirectly, in whole or in part—for any purpose other than for evaluation. MD Helicopters, Inc. reserves the right to revise this Technical Description at any time MD 902 Explorer Technical Description REPORT NO.: MD14021407-902TD NO. OF PAGES: 74 Use or disclosure of data in this Technical Description is subject to the restriction on the cover page of this document. ATTACHMENTS: None Revision By Approved Date Pages and/or Paragraphs Affected New RCP 14-Feb-14 All (Initial Issue) MD 902 Explorer Technical Description Contents 1. FOREWORD ........................................................................................................ 1
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Tailboom Strakes and Vertical Fin Modifications on the Performance and Handling Qualities of OH-58 Helicopters
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2008 The Effect of Tailboom Strakes and Vertical Fin Modifications on the Performance and Handling Qualities of OH-58 Helicopters John A. Wade University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Wade, John A., "The Effect of Tailboom Strakes and Vertical Fin Modifications on the erP formance and Handling Qualities of OH-58 Helicopters. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2008. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/477 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by John A. Wade entitled "The Effect of Tailboom Strakes and Vertical Fin Modifications on the erP formance and Handling Qualities of OH-58 Helicopters." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Richard Ranaudo, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Stephen Corda, Uwe P. Solies Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by John A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery and Prediction of Vortex Flow Aerodynamics
    THE AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL JUNE 2019 VOLUME 123 NO 1264 729 pp 729–804. c Royal Aeronautical Society 2019.This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/aer.2019.43 The discovery and prediction of vortex flow aerodynamics J.M. Luckring1 [email protected] NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, USA ABSTRACT High-speed aircraft often develop separation-induced leading-edge vortices and vortex flow aerodynamics. In this paper, the discovery of separation-induced vortex flows and the devel- opment of methods to predict these flows for wing aerodynamics are reviewed. Much of the content for this article was presented at the 2017 Lanchester Lecture and the content was selected with a view towards Lanchester’s approach to research and development. Keywords: Aerodynamics; Vortex flow; Slender wings NOMENCLATURE AR aspect ratio, b2/S a similarity variable, α/tan() b wingspan CD drag coefficient CD,o minimum drag coefficient CD CD − CD,o CL lift coefficient CLα lift curve slope CL,p potential flow lift coefficient CL,v vortex flow lift coefficient Cm pitching moment coefficient Cp pressure coefficient Cp lifting pressure coefficient, Cp,l -Cp,u c wing chord cn section normal force coefficient cr root chord cs section suction coefficient ct tip chord 1 Senior Research Engineer, Configuration Aerodynamics Branch Received 27 January 2019; revised 6 March 2019; accepted 4 April 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Wing-Strake Juncture
    . c. 1 NASA Technical Paper 1803 .. .. I. - .~ ,. Experimental " and Analytical .Study. .. of the Longitudin al. Aero-dynamic . ~ , .- Characteristics of Analyticallyand -, - Configurations at.. -Subcritical Speeds .. John E. Lamar and ,Neal .T..Frink .~ TECH LIBRARY WFB, NY NASA TechnicalPaper 1803 Experimentaland Analytical Study of theLongitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of Analytically and Empirically Designed Strake- Wing Configurationsat Subcritical Speeds John E. Lamar and Neal T. Frink Latzgley ResearchCenter Humpton, Virgillia National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1981 SUMMARY Sixteen analytically and empirically designed strakes havebeen tested experimentally on a wing-body at three subcritical speeds in such a way as toisolate thestrake-forebody loads from the wing-afterbody loads.Analyti- cal estimates for these longitudinal results havebeen made using thesuction analogy and the augmented vortex lift concepts. The comparisons show thatthe pitch data, both total and components, arebracketed well by the high- andlow- angle-of-attack modelings of thevortex lift theories. The lift dataare gener- ally better estimated by thehigh-angle-of-attack vortex lift theory and then only until maximum lift orstrake-vortex breakdown occurs over the wing. The compressibilityeffects noted in thedata for the strake-forebody lift are explained theoretically by a reduction in the wing upwash associated with increasing Machnumber which leadsto smaller potential and vortex lifts on the forward lifting surfaces. Aerodynamic synergism was investigatedexperimentally; as expected, there wasan additional lift benefit for all configurations as a result of the interaction. Furthermore, there was a delay in pitch-upassociated with the synergism. Machnumber has a small effect on the"additional lifting surface effi- ciencyfactor" whereas changes in thestrake geometry have largereffects.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Empennage Buffeting
    NASA Contractor Report 179426 Investigation of Empennage Buffeting C. Edward Lan and I. G. Lee Flight Research Laboratory The University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc. Lawrence, Kansas 66045 Appendix by William H. Wentz, Jr. Wichita State University Prepared for Ames Research Center Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, California Under Contract NAG2- 371 1987 N/ $A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, California 93523- 5000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY ......................................................... iii LIST OF SYMBOLS .................................................. iv I. INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1 2. THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 3 2.1 Formulation of Equations ................................ 3 2.2 Existing Theoretical Methods for Buffet Prediction ..... I0 2.3 The Present Proposed Method ............................ 17 3. NUMERICAL RESULTS ........................................... 25 3.1 Results for a 65-degree Delta Wing ..................... 26 3.2 Results for an F-18 Configuration ...................... 27 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................. 30 5. REFERENCES .................................................. 31 APPENDIX: Water Tunnel Studies of Vortex Flow and Vortex-Fin Interaction on the F/A-18 Aircraft ......... 51 PRECEDING pAGE BLANK NOT FILMED [ii LIST OF SYMBOLS the generalized aerodynamic force matrix Anj - f/ Cpj% bending moment
    [Show full text]