DOCSLIB.ORG

Wednesday, August 11, 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CLATSOP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA WORK SESSION & REGULAR MEETING VIRTUAL MEETING Wednesday, August 11, 2021 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: CONTACT: Mark Kujala, Dist. 1 – Chair 800 Exchange, Suite 410 Lianne Thompson, Dist. 5 – Vice Chair Astoria, OR 97103 John Toyooka, Dist. 2 Phone (503) 325-1000 Pamela Wev, Dist. 3 Fax (503) 325-8325 Courtney Bangs, Dist. 4 [email protected] www.co.clatsop.or.us JOIN THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VIRTUAL MEETINGS Clatsop County Board of Commissioners host virtual meetings on GoToMeeting During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board remains committed to broad community engagement and transparency of government. To provide an opportunity for public testimony while physical distancing guidelines are in effect, the Board will host virtual meetings on GoToMeeting. To join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/793513109 You can also dial in using your phone. United States (Toll Free): 1 877 309 2073 United States: +1 (646) 749-3129 Access Code: 793-513-109 Those wishing to provide testimony on public hearings or provide oral communication at the designated time must register in advance by calling 503-325-1000 or email [email protected]. Once registered, you will be notified when it is your opportunity to speak for a two-minute presentation. The public may also submit comments to [email protected] which will be provided to the Board and submitted into the record . WORK SESSION: 5:00 PM Work Sessions are an opportunity for Board members to discuss issues informally with staff and invited guests. The Board encourages members of the public to attend Work Sessions and listen to the discussion, but there is generally no opportunity for public comment. Members of the public wishing to address the Board are welcome to do so during the Board’s regularly scheduled meetings held twice monthly. Board Communication {5 min} Discuss Formal Agenda {5 min} TOPICS: 1. Comprehensive Plan Update – Draft Goal 5 Background Report and Policy Questions {20 min} {Page 3} Page 1 2. Beach Access {15 min} {Page 29} REGULAR MEETING: 6:00 PM The Board of Commissioners, as the Governing Body of Clatsop County, all County Service Districts for which this body so acts, and as the Clatsop County Local Contract Review Board, is now meeting in Regular Session. ROLL CALL AGENDA APPROVAL BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC – Individuals wishing to provide oral communication at the designated time must register in advance by calling 503-325-1000 or email [email protected] by 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting. CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Approve the 2021-22 Budget and Appropriation Adjustments 4. Westport Ferry Dredging & Log Vane Reconstruction – 2021 {Page 35} 5. Guardrail Installation – 2021 {Page 48} COMMISSIONER'S LIAISON REPORTS COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARING 6. Short-Term Rental Moratorium Ordinance 21-03 – 1st Public Hearing {Page 66} BUSINESS AGENDA 7. Consider an offer on County owned property {Page 76} GOOD OF THE ORDER ADJOURNMENT As necessary Executive Session will be held in accordance with but not limited to: ORS 192.660 (2)(d) Labor Negotiations; ORS 192.660 (2)(e) Property Transactions: ORS 192.660 (2)(f) Records exempt from public inspection; ORS 192.660 (2)(h) Legal Counsel Agenda packets also available online at www.co.clatsop.or.us This meeting is accessible to persons with disabilities or wish to attend but do not have computer access or cell phone access. Please call 325-1000 if you require special accommodations at least 48 hours prior to the meeting in order to participate. Page 2 Board of Commissioners Clatsop County WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY August 11, 2021 Topic: Comprehensive Plan Update – Draft Goal 5 Background Report and Policy Questions Presented By: Gail Henrikson, Community Development Director Informational OVERVIEW Summary: At its June 15, 2021, work session, the Board directed staff to move forward with the comprehensive plan update process utilizing Scenario #3. As the process restarts, staff is preparing a draft of Goal 5 for the joint Planning Commission / Countywide Citizen Advisory Committee meeting in October. While staff is still writing the historic context, current conditions and future conditions text of the first draft of Goal 5, the attached background report is intended to provide the Board with an overview of the topics covered by Goal 5 and the new policy recommendations that have been provided by the citizen advisory committee members. The “New Policy Recommendations” are provided so the Board is aware of the issues and concerns that have been raised by members of the citizen advisory committees and members of the public that participated in the committee meetings. The Board and public should note that policy recommendations that would conflict with state statutes or other laws have not been included in this initial draft. The Goal 5 background report and new policy recommendations are attached as Exhibit A. In conjunction with the background report, staff has also prepared a policy questions memo for Goal 5. The intent of the memo is to highlight areas where future Board discussion and direction will be required. The Board’s guidance on these policy issues will assist staff in understanding parameters and scope, which can then be conveyed to the citizen advisory committee and planning commission members. NEXT STEPS As staff continues to prepare draft goals for public, committee, planning commission, and Board review, those drafts, and any identified policy questions, will be forwarded to the Board. Staff will work with the County Manager to schedule work session dates when these issues can be discussed by the Board. Attachment List Agenda Item #1. Page 3 A. Goal 5 Background Report and Policy Questions Memo Agenda Item #1. Page 4 EXHIBIT A Goal 5 Background Report and Policy Questions Memo Agenda Item #1. Page 5 Clatsop County TO: Board of Clatsop County Commissioners CC: Don Bohn, County Manager Joanna Lyons-Antley, County Counsel FROM: Gail Henrikson, Community Development Director DATE: July 29, 2021 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL 5 – DRAFT 1 REWRITE As staff continues to prepare a first draft of Goal 5 for the October joint Planning Commission / Countywide Citizen Advisory Committee review, questions have arisen that require direction from the Board. The Goal 5 background report and new policy recommendations memo is attached. These questions include: ISSUE STAFF COMMENT FUTURE NEEDED BOARD DIRECTION 1. Statewide Planning Goal 5 • The benefit of a “safe • Does the Board wish to utilize the requires the county to harbor” approach is that it “safe harbor” approach, retain the inventory and determine can be applied objectively current inventory system, or significant riparian corridors and can be easily create a hybrid system? and wetlands and to include understood by the public. It regulations and standards in its would also apply protections implementing ordinances in to riparian corridors and order to protect those wetlands that may be inventoried resources. prominent, large or newly emergent, but which were There are two accepted not included in the original methods for complying with Goal 5 inventory. this requirement: • Adoption of the “safe • The county can adopt a harbor” approach is less “safe harbor” fine-grained than the methodology, which would specific identification and apply predetermined inventory approach buffers along all riparian currently used by the areas and wetlands as county. detailed in OAR 660-023- 0090(5). • The county can also inventory its riparian corridors and wetlands to determine which may be For project information and updates, visit us on the web! www.co.clatsop.or.us/landuse/page/comprehensive-plan-update www.facebook.com/ClatsopCD Agenda Item #1. Page 6 Clatsop County potentially significant. The county would then conduct an Economic, Social, Environmental and Energy (ESEE) evaluation for specific riparian corridors and wetlands to determine which should be included in the Goal 5 inventory. Protective regulations would then be drafted for those identified resources. The County currently does not utilize the “safe harbor” approach. 2. The Southwest Coastal CAC has • Between 2014 and 2017, the • Does the Board wish to move repeatedly expressed a desire County’s Wetland Advisory forward with adoption of the for the county to adopt the Committee drafted Arch Cape Local Wetland Arch Cape Local Wetlands recommendations that were Inventory and associated “safe Inventory that was prepared in presented to the Board of harbor” regulations? 2011 and that was approved by Commissioners on March the Oregon Department of 22, 2017. One of the State Lands (DSL). recommendations to the Board was to adopt the Arch Cape Local Wetland Inventory and to develop regulations consistent with the “safe harbor” approach. The Board did not take any action on the recommendations from the advisory committee. • The inventory is 10 years old. Recent DSL-approved delineations for privately- owned parcels in this area have revealed discrepancies between the local wetland inventory and actual ground conditions. 3. Also included in the March 22, • The second • Does the Board wish to include 2017, Wetlands Advisory recommendation, to create any of the Wetland Advisory For project information and updates, visit us on the web! www.co.clatsop.or.us/landuse/page/comprehensive-plan-update www.facebook.com/ClatsopCD Agenda Item #1. Page 7 Clatsop County Committee recommendations an Enhanced Local Committee’s recommendations in were the following: Notification System, was Goal 5? • Develop a countywide partially addressed when transfer of development DSL published its Statewide rights program to Wetlands Inventory in 2020, encourage non-resource- which includes data on zone property owners to hydric soils. preserve wetlands by transferring/selling their development rights to another property owner whose land does not contain wetlands. • Implement an Enhanced Local Wetland Notification Program to determine when a notice of pending development would need to be sent to DSL.
Recommended publications
  • 155891 WPO 43.2 Inside WSUP C.Indd

    155891 WPO 43.2 Inside WSUP C.Indd

    MAY 2017 VOL 43 NO 2 LEWIS AND CLARK TRAIL HERITAGE FOUNDATION • Black Sands and White Earth • Baleen, Blubber & Train Oil from Sacagawea’s “monstrous fish” • Reviews, News, and more the Rocky Mountain Fur Trade Journal VOLUME 11 - 2017 The Henry & Ashley Fur Company Keelboat Enterprize by Clay J. Landry and Jim Hardee Navigation of the dangerous and unpredictable Missouri River claimed many lives and thousands of dollars in trade goods in the early 1800s, including the HAC’s Enterprize. Two well-known fur trade historians detail the keelboat’s misfortune, Ashley’s resourceful response, and a possible location of the wreck. More than Just a Rock: the Manufacture of Gunflints by Michael P. Schaubs For centuries, trappers and traders relied on dependable gunflints for defense, hunting, and commerce. This article describes the qualities of a superior gunflint and chronicles the evolution of a stone-age craft into an important industry. The Hudson’s Bay Company and the “Youtah” Country, 1825-41 by Dale Topham The vast reach of the Hudson’s Bay Company extended to the Ute Indian territory in the latter years of the Rocky Mountain rendezvous period, as pressure increased from The award-winning, peer-reviewed American trappers crossing the Continental Divide. Journal continues to bring fresh Traps: the Common Denominator perspectives by encouraging by James A. Hanson, PhD. research and debate about the The portable steel trap, an exponential improvement over snares, spears, nets, and earlier steel traps, revolutionized Rocky Mountain fur trade era. trapping in North America. Eminent scholar James A. Hanson tracks the evolution of the technology and its $25 each plus postage deployment by Euro-Americans and Indians.
  • Captain Clark at Tillamook Head, 1806

    Captain Clark at Tillamook Head, 1806

    Captain Clark at Tillamook Head, 1806 By William Clark In the journal entry reproduced here, Captain William Clark offers a detailed description of the northern Oregon coast as he encountered it on January 8, 1806. Standing at the top of Tillamook Head, Clark described the view in every direction, noting the natural features of the landscape as well as the Indian villages that could be seen. Among the Native groups he identified were the “Killamox,” better known as the Tillamook. The Tillamook were a group of related Salishan-speaking communities on the central and northern Oregon coast. Clark wrote that there were five principal Tillamook villages in 1806, three of which he could see from his vantage point. He estimated their population at about 1,000, though their numbers had already been reduced by two smallpox epidemics probably introduced by maritime fur traders in the late 1770s and again in 1801. Clark described a number of large burial canoes near an old village site, possibly depopulated by this devasting disease. Clark observed that the Tillamook were culturally quite similar to the Clatsop and other Chinookan peoples of the Columbia River. Even though the Tillamook spoke a different language, they interacted frequently with their immediate neighbors to the north, south, and east. The first peoples of the Oregon and Washington coast were culturally and economically linked by a trade network that centered on the lower Columbia River. Whale blubber and oil were valuable items in this regional trade network. In January 1806, Clark led a party south from Fort Clatsop hoping to obtain blubber and oil from a whale that had washed ashore at present-day Cannon Beach.
  • Ecola State Park

    Ecola State Park

    Pack it in, pack it out. Please don’t litter. Play it safe on the beach! Stay off logs, know the tide schedule, and Park Information: 63400-8088 (2/13) don’t turn your back on the ocean. 1-800-551-6949 Ecola www.oregonstateparks.org Year-Round Picnicking Links with History Wrapping around Tillamook Head between Seaside and Cannon Beach, Ecola State Park is a hiking and sightseeing Picnic areas with tables are located near viewpoints at the Ecola State Park is a part of the Lewis and Clark National mecca with a storied past. Ecola Point and Indian Beach parking areas. A covered picnic and State Historical Park, which includes federal and state shelter at Ecola Point is reservable for group use through parks associated with the history of the Corps of Discovery STATE PARK Trails for Explorers Reservations Northwest (1-800-452-5687). Ecola Point is 1½ expedition in both Oregon and Washington. Ecola’s trails are situated above nine miles of Pacific Ocean miles above the park’s vehicle entrance near Cannon Beach. shoreline. They offer cliffside viewpoints that look out on Beach Discoveries Pacific Ocean To Astoria picture-postcard seascapes, cozy coves, densely forested Saddle Mt. Two spacious, sandy beaches–Crescent Beach and Indian Ecola State Natural Area promontories, and even a long-abandoned offshore lighthouse. Parking The trail network includes an 8-mile segment of the Oregon Beach–provide opportunities to explore the wonders of Ecola Trailhead 1 Seaside N Coast Trail (OCT)—the park’s backbone—and a 2 /2-mile State Park.
  • State Highway Department

    State Highway Department

    Description of WOrk of the State Highway Department in the Counties of the State 1923 -1924 BAKER COUNTY There was less activity in highway constructjon in Baker County dur- ing the biennium just past than in previousyears. However, the main trunk line highway known as the Old Oregon Trailwas completed during this period, and some work was doneon the Baker-Cornucopia and the Baker-Unity Highways. The work on the Baker-Cornucopia Highway involved theconstruction of the grade down the Powder River Canyon, which eliminated the high Sparta summit and materially improved existing communicationbetween the Eagle and Pine Valleys and Baker.However, there still remains a very bad section between Middle Bridge and Love Bridge, and the section between Black Bridge and Richland, through the Dry Gulch country, is impassable to automobile traffic during the spring of theyear. On the Baker-Unity Highway the gradeon both sides of Dooley Moun- tain was completed. Those who were forced to travel the old mountain grade, which was narrow, crooked, and in places reacheda gradient of 22 per cent, will appreciate traveling over thenew highway now open to traffic. The total length of grading completed in Baker County during the past biennium was 18.11 miles, of which 8.95 mileswere surfaced. in addition to this work there were 25.90 miles surveyed. The Baker County bond issue of 1918, amounting to $500,000,was in- sufficient to meet the State in cooperating to complete the state highways through the county, and on November 4, 1924,an additional $500,00G was voted to complete the Baker-Cornucopia and the Baker-Unity High- ways.
  • Spawning Areas and Abundance of Chinook Salmon {Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha} in the Columbia River Basin--Past and Present By

    Spawning Areas and Abundance of Chinook Salmon {Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha} in the Columbia River Basin--Past and Present By

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR u.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Spawning Areas and Abundance of Chinook Salmon {Oncorhynchus tshawytscha} in The Columbia River Basin--Past and Present By LEONARD A. FULTON United States Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report- - Fisheries No. 571 Washington, D.C. October 1968 CONTENTS Page Introduction........................ Spring- and summer-run chinook salmon. .. 3 Spawning areas . .. 3 Abundance of spring- and summer- run chinook salmon. 4 Fall-run chinook salmon. 16 Spawning areas . 16 Abundance of fall- run chinook salmon 20 Summary and conclusions 22 Acknowledgments. 23 Literature cited .. 24 Maps .............. .See Map Appendix iii Spawning Areas and Abundance of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in The Columbia River Basin--Past and Present By LEONARD A. FULTON, Fishery Biologist Bureau of Commercial Fisheries 'Biological Laboratory Seattle, Washington 98102 ABSTRACT Chinook salmon, the most abundant species of salmon in the Columbia Basin, formerly spawned in nearly a11 tributaries ofthe Columbia River and in many areas of the main river. Over the past 60 years, the construction of dams has inundated, impeded, or blocke.d acces!, to spawning areas. Despite these heavy losses, large areas of spawning grounds in the middle and lower portions of the drainage are sti11 available to chinook salmon. Stream im­ provements by State and Federal fishery agencies have rehabilitated some areas and have brought others into production for the first time. Important spawning areas are listed and charted in this report according to their past use (before 1965) and present use (1966). Estimates of recent spawning populations in major tributaries and in segments of the main stem are also given.
  • Fort Clatsop, Lewis and Clark's 1805-1806 Winter Establishment "Living History" Demonstrations Feature for Visitors to National Park Facility

    Fort Clatsop, Lewis and Clark's 1805-1806 Winter Establishment "Living History" Demonstrations Feature for Visitors to National Park Facility

    T HE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE LEWIS & CLARK T RAIL H ERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. VOL. 12, NO. 3 AUGUST 1986 Fort Clatsop, Lewis and Clark's 1805-1806 Winter Establishment "Living History" Demonstrations Feature for Visitors to National Park Facility Photograph by Andrew E. Cier, Astoria, Oregon Replica of Fort Clatsop, Near Astoria, Oregon - See Story on Page 3 - President Wang's THE LEWIS AND CLARK TRAIL Message HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. Thank you's are due at least four Incorporated 1969 under Missouri General Not-For-Profit Corporation Act IRS Exemption different groups of Foundation Certificate No. 501(C)(3) - I dentification No. 51-0187715 members for the efforts put forth by them these past twelve months. OFFICERS - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE First, I am most thankful for the President 1st Vice President 2nd Vice President excellent support that has been L. Edw in Wang John E. Foote H. John Montague provided by Foundation officers, 6013 St . Johns Ave. 1205 Rimhaven Way 2864 Sudbury Ct. directors, past presidents, and all M inneapolis. MN 55424 Billings. MT 591 02 Marietta. GA'30062 other committee members. Second, I am much indebted to the 1986 Edrie Lee Vinson. Secretary John E. Walker. Treasurer P.O. Box 1651 200 Market St .. Suite 1177 Program Committee, headed by Red Lodge. MT 59068 Portland. OR 97201 Malcolm Buffum, for the tre­ mendous effort they have put forth Ruth E. Lange, Membership Secretary. 5054 S.W. 26th Place. Port land. OR 97201 to arrange one of the finest-ever annual meeting programs. Third, I DIRECTORS am so grateful for all that is ac­ Harold Billian Winifred C.
  • Skipaon River Restoration

    Skipaon River Restoration

    Skipanon River Restoration Action Plan Adopted May, 2006 Background of Project The Skipanon Watershed Council formed in 1997 as a community-based organization to identify and proactively address watershed restoration. In 2004, the council was given funds from a civil penalty suit against a local fish processing plant. The funds are to be used for restoration in the Skipanon Watershed. Before using funds for any restoration projects, the council felt it was important to revise its Action Plan to identify the most ecological significant restoration projects within the watershed. Goal of Project The goals of this document are to identify, analyze and priotizes, to the extent possible, potential site-specific conservation projects within the Skipanon Watershed. The Council hopes to create a document based in sound ecological principles, yet understandable by the lay reader. Additionally, the Council hopes to highlight partnership opportunities, monitoring efforts and educational opportunities. Ultimately, the Council and other watershed related organizations can utilize this document to help guide restoration, conservation and acquisition activities, monitoring and education within watershed. Lastly, the Council hopes the numerical prioritization methodology is transferable to the estuarine portions of the Youngs Bay and Nicolai-Wickiup Watersheds. Methods Summary of Methods The methods to achieve the goals of the project were to 1) involve the public and 2) review and utilize other prioritization criteria. As a community-based organization, it was imperative to involve as many community members, landowners, interested citizens, municipalities and agencies in the process of identifying restoration activities as possible. To identify potential restoration projects, the Council relied on the expertise of local community members, landowners, interested citizens, representatives from local municipalities and agencies.
  • Geophysical and Geochemical Analyses of Selected Miocene Coastal Basalt Features, Clatsop County, Oregon

    Geophysical and Geochemical Analyses of Selected Miocene Coastal Basalt Features, Clatsop County, Oregon

    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1980 Geophysical and geochemical analyses of selected Miocene coastal basalt features, Clatsop County, Oregon Virginia Josette Pfaff Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Geochemistry Commons, Geophysics and Seismology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Pfaff, Virginia Josette, "Geophysical and geochemical analyses of selected Miocene coastal basalt features, Clatsop County, Oregon" (1980). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3184. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.3175 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Virginia Josette Pfaff for the Master of Science in Geology presented December 16, 1980. Title: Geophysical and Geochemical Analyses of Selected Miocene Coastal Basalt Features, Clatsop County, Oregon. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Chairman Gi lTfiert-T. Benson The proximity of Miocene Columbia River basalt flows to "locally erupted" coastal Miocene basalts in northwestern Oregon, and the compelling similarities between the two groups, suggest that the coastal basalts, rather than being locally erupted, may be the westward extension of plateau
  • Appendices Appendix A

    Appendices Appendix A

    APPENDICES APPENDIX A HISTORY OF SKIPANON RIVER WATERSHED Prepared by Lisa Heigh and the Skipanon River Watershed Council Appendix A - Skipanon River Watershed History 2 APPENDIX A HISTORY Skipanon River Watershed Natural History TIMELINE · 45 million years ago - North American Continent begins collision with Pacific Ocean Seamounts (now the Coast Range) · 25 million years ago Oregon Coast began to emerge from the sea · 20 million years ago Coast Range becomes a firm part of the continent · 15 million years ago Columbia River Basalt lava flows stream down an ancestral Columbia River · 12,000 years ago last Ice Age floods scour the Columbia River · 10,000 years ago Native Americans inhabit the region (earliest documentation) - Clatsop Indians used three areas within the Skipanon drainage as main living, fishing and hunting sites: Clatsop Plains, Hammond and a site near the Skipanon River mouth, where later D.K. Warren (Warrenton founder) built a home. · 4,500 years ago Pacific Ocean shoreline at the eastern shore of what is now Cullaby Lake · 1700’s early part of the century last major earthquake · 1780 estimates of the Chinook population in the lower Columbia Region: 2,000 total – 300 of which were Clatsops who lived primarily in the Skipanon basin. · 1770’s-1790’s Robert Gray and other Europeans explore and settle Oregon and region, bringing with them disease/epidemic (smallpox, malaria, measles, etc.) to native populations · 1805-1806 Lewis and Clark Expedition, camp at Fort Clatsop and travel frequently through the Skipanon Watershed
  • Gearhart to Fort Stevens, Prelim

    Gearhart to Fort Stevens, Prelim

    NOTICE The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is publishing this paper because the information furthers the mission of the Department. To facilitate timely distribution of the information, this report is published as received from the authors and has not been edited to our usual standards. STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Suite 965, 800 NE Oregon St., #28 Portland, Oregon 97232 OPEN-FILE REPORT O-01-04 COASTAL EROSION HAZARD ZONES ALONG THE CLATSOP PLAINS, OREGON: GEARHART TO FORT STEVENS PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL REPORT TO CLATSOP COUNTY 2001 By JONATHAN C. ALLAN AND GEORGE R. PRIEST Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Coastal Field Office, 313 SW 2nd St, Suite D, Newport, OR 97365 NOTICE The results and conclusions of this report are necessarily based on limited geologic and geophysical data. At any given site in any map area, site-specific data could give results that differ from those shown in this report. This report cannot replace site-specific investigations. The hazards of an individual site should be assessed through geotechnical or engineering geology investigation by qualified practitioners. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 BEACH PROCESSES AND FEATURES......................................................................... 2 Beach Erosion –
  • Plate 5. Flood Hazard Map of Clatsop County, Oregon, Appendix E Map

    Plate 5. Flood Hazard Map of Clatsop County, Oregon, Appendix E Map

    Natural Hazard Risk Report for Clatsop County, Oregon G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L PLATE 5 P I E N Flood Hazard Map of D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O Clatsop County, Oregon WASHINGTON 1937 Flood Hazard Zone 100-Year Flood (1% annual chance) Columbia River sourcesThe �lood include hazard riverine. data show Areas areas are consistentexpected to with be inundated during a 100-year �lood event. Flooding Counties Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps. the regulatory �lood zones depicted in Clatsop Astoria ¤£101 30 Warrenton «¬104 ¤£ Skipanon River Svensen-Knappa Disclaimer: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for John Day River Westport legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary Wallooskee River Ra�o of Es�mated Loss to Flooding data and information sources to ascertain the usability Flood Scenarios of the information. This publication cannot substitute 10-Year 50-Year 100-Year 500-Year ¤£101 for site-speci�ic investigations by quali�ied Exposure Ratio differ from the results shown in the publication. See thepractitioners. accompanying Site-speci�ic text report data for may more give details results on that the ~ ~ «¬202 0% 0.5% 1% 4.5% limitations of the methods and data used to prepare Clatsop County this publication. (rural)* Y o Arch Cape* Gearhart u ng s Ri Svensen-Knappa* ver Seaside Lewis a This map is an overview map and not intended to nd Westport* C er provide details at the community scale.
  • Irmary Marin8 Science Laboratory Oregon State University

    Irmary Marin8 Science Laboratory Oregon State University

    IrMARY Marin8 Science Laboratory Oregon State University Vol. 34, No. 11 November 1972 S • STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES The Ore Bin Published Monthly By • STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES • Head Office: 1069 State Office Bldg., Portland, Oregon - 97201 Telephone: 229 - 5580 FIELD OFFICES 2033 First Street 521 N. E. "E" Street Baker 97814 Grants Pass 97526 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Subscription rate - $2.00 per calendar year Available back issues $.25 each Second class postage paid at Portland, Oregon 'k • GOVERNING BOARD • R. W. deWeese, Portland, Chairman William E. Miller, Bend Donald G. McGregor, Grants Pass STATE GEOLOGIST R. E. Corcoran GEOLOGISTS IN CHARGE OF FIELD OFFICES Norman S. Wagner, Baker Len Ramp, Grants Pass 5Z 5Z 'St` 5Z k 5Z 5Z 5Z 5Z 5Z 'SZ 'SZk 5Z 5Z 5Z 5Z 5Z 5Z 5Z 5Z Permission is granted to reprint information contained herein. • Credit given the State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries for compiling this information will be appreciated. • State of Oregon The ORE BIN Department of Geology Volume 34,no.11 and Mineral Industries 1069 State Office Bldg. November 1972 • Portland Oregon 97201 COASTAL LANDFORMS BETWEEN TILLAMOOK BAY AND THE COLUMBIA RIVER, OREGON Ernest H. Lund Department of Geology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon The 50-mile stretch of the Oregon coast between Tillamook Bay and the Columbia River can be divided into three nearly equal segments according to the kinds of land- forms along them. The southern segment extends from Tillamook Bay to Neahkahnie Mountain (map 1), the middle from Neahkahnie Mountain to Tillamook Head inclu- sive (map 2), and the northern from Tillamook Head to the Columbia River (map 3).