DOCSLIB.ORG

State Highway Department

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Highway Department Description of WOrk of the State Highway Department in the Counties of the State 1923 -1924 BAKER COUNTY There was less activity in highway constructjon in Baker County dur- ing the biennium just past than in previousyears. However, the main trunk line highway known as the Old Oregon Trailwas completed during this period, and some work was doneon the Baker-Cornucopia and the Baker-Unity Highways. The work on the Baker-Cornucopia Highway involved theconstruction of the grade down the Powder River Canyon, which eliminated the high Sparta summit and materially improved existing communicationbetween the Eagle and Pine Valleys and Baker.However, there still remains a very bad section between Middle Bridge and Love Bridge, and the section between Black Bridge and Richland, through the Dry Gulch country, is impassable to automobile traffic during the spring of theyear. On the Baker-Unity Highway the gradeon both sides of Dooley Moun- tain was completed. Those who were forced to travel the old mountain grade, which was narrow, crooked, and in places reacheda gradient of 22 per cent, will appreciate traveling over thenew highway now open to traffic. The total length of grading completed in Baker County during the past biennium was 18.11 miles, of which 8.95 mileswere surfaced. in addition to this work there were 25.90 miles surveyed. The Baker County bond issue of 1918, amounting to $500,000,was in- sufficient to meet the State in cooperating to complete the state highways through the county, and on November 4, 1924,an additional $500,00G was voted to complete the Baker-Cornucopia and the Baker-Unity High- ways. TheseS highways are now all surveyed and it is expected that during the next biennium a considerable portion will be graded and surfaced. All state highway work in Baker County covered by this report, in- cluding surveys, construction and maintenance, was under the supervision of R. H. Baldock, Division Engineer. 164 SIXTH BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE [BAKER] Nelson-Malheur County Line Grading and Surfacing On the Old Oregon Trail Highway, from Nelson to the MalheurCounty line, 4.85 miles south of Huntington; 24.09 miles of surfacing and4.85 miles of grading. Project graded to class C roadbed and surfacedwith 16 feet of broken stone. Contract No. 501, awarded March 23, 1922, to Porter &Conley of Portland, Oregon. Work commenced April 12, 1922; completedNovem- ber 6, 1922. Final cost, $126,812.62. Resident Engineer, C. E. Carter. Further details will be found on page 154 of the 1921-22 report. DETAILED STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES Engineering $8,825.65 Constructing rock walls and drinking fountain by State forces 687.98 Sprinkling macadam by State forces 1,079.39 Repair parts for truck furnished by State (deducted from contractor'o estimate) 8.00 Contract items as follows: Clearing and grubbing, all $ 20.00 Common excavation, 22,443.3 cu. yds. at 24e 5,386.39 Intermediate excavation, 6,119.6 cu. yds. at 40c 2,447.84 Overhaul, 4,299.0 yd. sta. at 5e 214.95 12-inch plain concrete pipe, 653.4 lin. ft. at $1.25 816.75 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe, 280.0 un. ft. at $2.05 574.00 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe, 112.0 lin. ft. at $2.75 808.00 36-inch reinforced concrete pipe, 296.0 lin. ft. at $5.50 1,628.00 Class "C" concrete, 71.62 cu. yds. at $25.00 1,790.50 Broken stone surfacing, 40,601.5 cu. yds. at $1.94 78,766.91 Maintenance material. 2,308.5u.ds. at $1.94 4,478.49 Earth filler, 7,129.0 cu. yds. at 5c 356.45 Filler haul, 11,865.0 yd. mi. at 40c 4,746.00 Adjustment due to alterations in details of construction 3,156.71 Force account items: Removing slides, building up superelevation on curves, removing boulders and debris left by cloudburst 7,309.40 State share of grading within City of Huntington 291.15 Furnishing lumber for rockcheckers tents 27.90 Total amount earned by contractor $112,319.44 Deduction for truck parts furnished by State 8.00 Total amount paid to contractor by State 112,311.44 Construction for City of Huntington: Common excavation, 1,128.0 cu. yds. at 24c $ 270.72 Intermediate excavation, 37.8 cu. yds. at 40c 15.12 Overhaul, 176.0 yd. sta. at 5c 8.80 12-inch plain concrete pipe, 81.6 lin. ft. at $1.25 102.00 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe, 11.0 un. tt. at $2.05 22.55 Class "C" concrete, 1.24 cu. yds. at $25.00 31.00 Crushed gravel surfacing, 785.0 Cu. yds. at $2.25 1,766.25 Crushed gravel surfacing, 448.0 cu. yds. at $1.94 869.12 Maintenance materials, 28.0 CU. yds. at $2.25 68.00 Maintenance materials. 14.0 cu. yds. at $1.94 27.16 Earth filler, 221.0 cu. yds. at 25c 55,25 Filler haul, 665.0 yd. mi. at 40c 266.00 Force account items: Grading Washington street 340.39 Sprinkling macadam in city 62.80 Total paid to contractor by city 3,900.16 Grand total cost ofroject $126,812.62 PARTICIPATION IN COST City of State County Huntington Total $101,181.16 Expended 1921-22 biennium $ 95,525.86 $ 3,830.60$2,024.70 Expended 1923-24 biennium 23,556.00 1,875.46 25,431.46 $126,812.62 Total of expenditures to date $119,081.86 $ 3,830.60$3,900.16 Estimated balances' to complete Cr.19,072.57 19,072.57 Estimated total coats $100,009.29$ 22,903.17$3,900.16$126,812.62 OREGON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION 165 {BAKER] Baker-Ilaines Ditching and Resurfacing On the Old Oregon Trail Highway, from Haines to Baker; 9.4 miles of ditching and resurfacing. Contract No. 572, awarded July 26, 1922, to the Newport Construction Co., of Hermiston, Oregon. Work commenced August 14, 1922; completed November 4, 1922. Final cost, $30,224.11. Resident Engineer, F. S. Davis. Further details will be found on page 153 of the 1921-22 report. DETAILED STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES Engineering 4 2,907.40 Dragging roadway by State forces (deducted from contractor's estimate) 20.34 Contract items as follows: Excavation, single classification, 13,014.0 cu. yds. at SOc $6,507.00 12-inch corrugated galvanized iron pipe, 186.0 un. ft. at $1.50 279.00 18-inch corrugated galvanized iron pipe, 156.0 lii,. ft. at $2.65 413.40 24-inch corrugated galvanized iron pipe, 60.0 lin. ft. at $8.50 210.00 18-inch reinforced concrete siphon pipe, 156.0 un. it. at $3.50 546.00 Class "A" concrete, 12.04 cu. yds. at $30.00 361.20 Class "C" concrete, 8.55 cu. yds. at $30.00 256.50 Lumber and timber. 2.016 M-FBM at $70.00 141.12 Top course resurfacing, 6,005.5 Cu. yds. at $2.00 12,011.00 Base course resurfacing, 1,782.5 Cu. yds. at $2.00 8,565.00 Maintenance materials, placed in piles, 1,845.7 cu. yds. at $1.40 2,583.98 Earth filler, 149.0 cu. yds. at 20c 29.80 Force account items: Removing pipe culverts made unnecessary by construc- tion of deeper and continuous side ditches 149.82 Disposal of waste material 262.89 Total amount earned by contractor $ 27,316.71 Deductions: Dragging roadway by State forces 20.34 Total amount paid to contraCtor 27.296,37 Grand total expended (all State funds) $ 30,224.11 SEGREGATION OF FUNDS Expended 1921-22 biennium $ 15,821.52 Expended 1923-24 biennium 14,402.59 Total of expenditures $ 30,224.11 Baker-Nelson Grading and Surfacing Federal Aid Project No, 66 On the Old Oregon Trail Highway, from Baker to Nelson; 26.95 miles of grading and surfacing; 22-foot roadbed, 16-foot surfacing. Contract No. 525, awarded April 14, 1922, to the Security Construc- tion Co., of La Grande, Oregon. Work commenced April 20, 1922; com- pleted January 30, 1923.Resident Engineer, W. P. Smith. This project eliminated' the Alder Creek Canyon, a deep and rocky defile, which was so impassable that the emigrants in traversing this sec- tion of the country were forced to detour from the direct line and ascend from the Burnt River Canyon by way of Prichard Creek to Virtue Flat and thence down to the Powder River Valley. Both crushed gravel and broken stone were used in the surfacing. One quarry of soft limestone made a very excellent surface. NoteFor Detailed Statement nf Expenditures see following page. 166 SIXTH BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE [BAKER] DETAILED STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES Engineering $ 13,263.70 Labor and materials furnished by the State: Sprinkling surfacing materials 4,593.72 Constructing temporary bridge 61.54 Labor installing culverts and constructing headwalls 186.74 Removing slides and blading road 422.92 Watchmen services guarding railway tracks 215.03 Grading approaches to Durkee Undercrossing (transferred to structure) Cr 440.46 Moving telegraph lines and poles 284.63 Rental of State-owned equipment (to he deducted from contractor's estimate)-- 1,088.31 Contract items as follows: Clearing and grubbing, all $ 200.00 Common excavation, 111,670.3 Cu. yds. at 23c 25,684.17 Intermediate excavation, 75,744.7 en. yds. at 38c 28,782.99 Solid rock excavation, 50,118.2 Cu. yds. at 98c 49,115.84 Overhaul, 74,923.0 yd. ste. at 4c 2,996.92 12-inch corrugated galvanized iron pipe, 2,288.0 liii.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Sutton Mountain Painted Hills Pat's Cabin
    visitors guide sutton mountain pat’s cabin painted hills proposed wilderness areas oregon natural desert association John Day River area (photo © Tyler Roemer) area facts Plant Communities Welcome to Sutton Mountain, Pat’s Cabin, Sutton Mountain, Pat’s Cabin, and Painted Hills are all dominated by big sagebrush, Painted Hills Proposed Wilderness Areas native bunchgrasses, and western juniper, Located near Mitchell, Oregon, and surrounding the Painted Hills National Monument, Sutton providing important habitat and forage for Mountain, Pat’s Cabin, and Painted Hills Proposed Wilderness Areas provide spectacular vistas of native wildlife. The sagebrush-juniper wood- the John Day River, Bridge Creek valley and surrounding landscape. These unique wild areas offer lands that characterize these unique areas recreational opportunities for hikers, horseback riders, hunters, botanists and other outdoor enthu- provide vital habitat for the sensitive species siasts. The proposed wilderness areas encompass Arrowleaf thelypody and Peck’s milkvetch. a diversity of habitat types including grasslands, riparian areas, sagebrush shrub steppe, wood- Wildlife lands, and forests. They also provide important This unique area provides essential habitat habitat for threatened summer steelhead and for a variety of wildlife, such as Western Chinook salmon. toads, lizards, snakes, Pygmy rabbits, bobcats, coyotes, cougar, mule deer, California bighorn Sutton Mountain The John Day River winds lazily around the sheep, and elk. A large number of birds base of Sutton Mountain, an iconic gem of also frequent the areas, including pileated the John Day Basin. This 29,000-acre potential woodpeckers, white-headed woodpeckers, wilderness area towers over steep ravines, native red-naped sapsuckers, ferruginous hawks, grasslands, and dramatic clay formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Spawning Areas and Abundance of Chinook Salmon {Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha} in the Columbia River Basin--Past and Present By
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR u.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Spawning Areas and Abundance of Chinook Salmon {Oncorhynchus tshawytscha} in The Columbia River Basin--Past and Present By LEONARD A. FULTON United States Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report- - Fisheries No. 571 Washington, D.C. October 1968 CONTENTS Page Introduction........................ Spring- and summer-run chinook salmon. .. 3 Spawning areas . .. 3 Abundance of spring- and summer- run chinook salmon. 4 Fall-run chinook salmon. 16 Spawning areas . 16 Abundance of fall- run chinook salmon 20 Summary and conclusions 22 Acknowledgments. 23 Literature cited .. 24 Maps .............. .See Map Appendix iii Spawning Areas and Abundance of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in The Columbia River Basin--Past and Present By LEONARD A. FULTON, Fishery Biologist Bureau of Commercial Fisheries 'Biological Laboratory Seattle, Washington 98102 ABSTRACT Chinook salmon, the most abundant species of salmon in the Columbia Basin, formerly spawned in nearly a11 tributaries ofthe Columbia River and in many areas of the main river. Over the past 60 years, the construction of dams has inundated, impeded, or blocke.d acces!, to spawning areas. Despite these heavy losses, large areas of spawning grounds in the middle and lower portions of the drainage are sti11 available to chinook salmon. Stream im­ provements by State and Federal fishery agencies have rehabilitated some areas and have brought others into production for the first time. Important spawning areas are listed and charted in this report according to their past use (before 1965) and present use (1966). Estimates of recent spawning populations in major tributaries and in segments of the main stem are also given.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical and Geochemical Analyses of Selected Miocene Coastal Basalt Features, Clatsop County, Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1980 Geophysical and geochemical analyses of selected Miocene coastal basalt features, Clatsop County, Oregon Virginia Josette Pfaff Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Geochemistry Commons, Geophysics and Seismology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Pfaff, Virginia Josette, "Geophysical and geochemical analyses of selected Miocene coastal basalt features, Clatsop County, Oregon" (1980). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3184. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.3175 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Virginia Josette Pfaff for the Master of Science in Geology presented December 16, 1980. Title: Geophysical and Geochemical Analyses of Selected Miocene Coastal Basalt Features, Clatsop County, Oregon. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Chairman Gi lTfiert-T. Benson The proximity of Miocene Columbia River basalt flows to "locally erupted" coastal Miocene basalts in northwestern Oregon, and the compelling similarities between the two groups, suggest that the coastal basalts, rather than being locally erupted, may be the westward extension of plateau
    [Show full text]
  • Preplan Analysis 4
    D0C.JM 3. I 53.2: H 44/2x ' PREPLAN ANALYSIS REVISING the RECREATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN ROGUE RIVER RECREATION SECTION (Activity Plan: Hellgate Recreation Section) INTRODUCTION PURPOSE THE PLANNING AREA RECREATION MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES VALID EXISTING MANAGEMENT, POSSIBLE ISSUES, CONCERNS, AND OPPORTUNITIES INVENTORY/POSSIBLE INVENTORY NEEDS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, STAKEHOLDERS, AND PARTNERS PLANNING STEPS AND SCHEDULE 4 MANAGEMENT APPROVAL 0070j PREPLAN ANALYSIS for REVISING the RECREATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN (Activity Plan: Hellgate Recreation Section) ROGUE RIVER RECREATION SECTION United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Medford District Office Grants Pass Resource Area Recommended by: z7 beaf Le~ Outdoor Recreation Planner May 1991 Grants Pass Resource Area Approved by: ,MAAA- La#- 5- 28-91 Area Managr May 1991 Grants Pass' Resource Area 0072/Outline OUTLINE PREPLAN ANALYSIS for REVISING RECREATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN ROGUE RIVER RECREATION SECTION I. INTRODUCTION II. PURPOSE A. Purpose of Recreation Area Management Plan B. Decision to Revise Recreation Area Management Plan C. Purpose of Preplan Analysis ll. THE PLANNING AREA A. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 B. Master Plan of 1969 C. Development and Management Plans of 1972 D. Activity Plan Hellgate Recreation Section of 1978 E. Josephine Timber Management Plan Record of Decision of 1979 F. Josephine Sustained Yield and Management Framework Plan of 1979 G. The Wild and Scenic Rogue River Map IV. RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES A. Bureau of Land Management Objectives B. Other Stakeholder Objectives V. VALID EXISTING MANAGEMENT, POSSIBLE ISSUES, CONCERNS, AND OPPORTUNITIES A. Valid Existing Management B. Possible Issues C. Possible Concerns D. Possible Opportunities VI. INVENTORY/POSSIBLE INVENTORY NEEDS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilliam County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan
    Gilliam County MULTI-JURISDICTION NATURAL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN Gilliam County City of Arlington City of Condon REVIEW CityCOPY of Lonerock Effective {DATE} 2018 through {DATE}, 2023 Gilliam County Multi-jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Gilliam County and the Cities of Arlington, Condon, and Lonerock Report for: Gilliam County City of Arlington City of Condon City of Lonerock Prepared by: University of Oregon’s Institute for Policy Research and Engagement (the Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience), Resource Assistance for Rural Environments and Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development September 2018 The 2018 Gilliam County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan is a living document that will be reviewed and updated periodically. Comments, suggestions, corrections, and additions are enthusiastically encouraged to be submitted from all interested parties. For further information and to provide comments, contact: Chris Fitzsimmons, Emergency Manager GilliamREVIEW County COPY 211 South Oregon Street, Oregon 97823 Telephone: 541-384-2851 Email: [email protected] Special Thanks & Acknowledgements Gilliam County developed this Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan through a regional partnership funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program. FEMA awarded the grant to support the update of natural hazards mitigation plans for eight counties in the region. The region’s planning process utilized a four- phased planning process and plan development support provided by the University of Oregon’s Institute for Policy Research and Engagement (IPRE) which includes the Resource Assistance for Rural Environments (RARE), and the Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience (OPDR). This project would not have been possible without technical and financial support provided by the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD).
    [Show full text]
  • Rogue National Wild and Scenic River
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Medford District Office Grants Pass Resource Area March 2003 Rogue National Wild and Scenic River: Hellgate Recreation Area Proposed Recreation Area Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U. S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/PL-03/008-1792 March 2003 Rogue National Wild and Scenic River: Hellgate Recreation Area Proposed Recreation Area Management Plan/ Final Environmental Impact Statement 1. Responsible Agency: United States Department of the Interior , Bureau of Land Management 2. Draft () Final (X) 3. Administrative Action (X) Legislative Action ( ) 4. Abstract: The Hellgate Recreation Area Proposed Recreation Area Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement (RAMP/FEIS) considers five alternatives for managing various resources and programs along the 27- mile stretch of the Rogue River System. In 1968, the United States Congress designated the U.S. Forest Service and the BLM as the lead agencies for managing the land and water within the identified National W ild and Scenic Rogue River corridor (84 miles from its confluence with the Applegate River downstream to the Lobster Creek Bridge).
    [Show full text]
  • Oigon Historic Tpms REPORT I
    ‘:. OIGoN HIsToRIc TPms REPORT I ii Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council May, 1998 h I Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents . Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon’s Historic Trails 7 C Oregon’s National Historic Trails 11 C Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail 13 Oregon National Historic Trail 27 Applegate National Historic Trail 47 a Nez Perce National Historic Trail 63 C Oregon’s Historic Trails 75 Kiamath Trail, 19th Century 77 o Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 87 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, 1832/1834 99 C Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1833/1834 115 o Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 129 Whitman Mission Route, 1841-1847 141 c Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 183 o Meek Cutoff, 1845 199 o Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 o Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 C General recommendations 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 247 4Xt C’ Executive summary C The Board of Directors and staff of the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council present the Oregon Historic Trails Report, the first step in the development of a statewide Oregon Historic C Trails Program. The Oregon Historic Trails Report is a general guide and planning document that will help future efforts to develop historic trail resources in Oregon. o The objective of the Oregon Historic Trails Program is to establish Oregon as the nation’s leader in developing historic trails for their educational, recreational, and economic values. The Oregon Historic Trails Program, when fully implemented, will help preserve and leverage C existing heritage resources while promoting rural economic development and growth through C heritage tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Results of the 2013 Oregon Sport Fishing Regulation Development Summary of Final Rules Adopted by the Commission on September 7Th, 2012
    Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 3406 Cherry Avenue NE Salem, OR 97303 Final Results of the 2013 Oregon Sport Fishing Regulation Development Summary of Final Rules Adopted by the Commission on September 7th, 2012 This package contains the following: Index of adopted and rejected proposals from the September 7th Commission meeting in Hermiston Oregon. Summary of final rules adopted by the Fish and Wildlife Commission at their September 7th, 2012 meeting in Hermiston Oregon. Final rule-making decisions by the Fish and Wildlife Commission for development of the 2013 Oregon Sport Fishing Regulations. The Commission adopted rules for the 2013 angling regulations at their September 7th meeting in Hermiston Oregon. Proposals followed by the letter “S” are ODFW or Oregon State Police (OSP) staff proposals (example 012S). Proposals followed by the letter “P” are proposals submitted by the public (example 25P) Table 1. Summary Index of adopted and rejected proposals from the September 7th Commission meeting. Statewide Regulations 1S Change Free Fishing Weekend Dates Adopted 2S Add new definitions “bobber” and “leader” Adopted 5S Adopt new Statewide Anti-Snagging Rules Adopted 7S Hook-less “bait” attracters in Ocean Salmon fishery Adopted 65P Allow Disabled Anglers Use of Electric Reels Adopted 4S Redefine definition of “Take” Adopted 3S Redefine “Snagging” to help enforcement Adopted 6P Soft-plastic and rubber imitations defined as lures Rejected 64P/91P “Rack-Your-Rod-Rule” Tidal Waters Rejected 6S Possession of fish in the field- Statewide
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, August 11, 2021
    CLATSOP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA WORK SESSION & REGULAR MEETING VIRTUAL MEETING Wednesday, August 11, 2021 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: CONTACT: Mark Kujala, Dist. 1 – Chair 800 Exchange, Suite 410 Lianne Thompson, Dist. 5 – Vice Chair Astoria, OR 97103 John Toyooka, Dist. 2 Phone (503) 325-1000 Pamela Wev, Dist. 3 Fax (503) 325-8325 Courtney Bangs, Dist. 4 [email protected] www.co.clatsop.or.us JOIN THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VIRTUAL MEETINGS Clatsop County Board of Commissioners host virtual meetings on GoToMeeting During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board remains committed to broad community engagement and transparency of government. To provide an opportunity for public testimony while physical distancing guidelines are in effect, the Board will host virtual meetings on GoToMeeting. To join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/793513109 You can also dial in using your phone. United States (Toll Free): 1 877 309 2073 United States: +1 (646) 749-3129 Access Code: 793-513-109 Those wishing to provide testimony on public hearings or provide oral communication at the designated time must register in advance by calling 503-325-1000 or email [email protected]. Once registered, you will be notified when it is your opportunity to speak for a two-minute presentation. The public may also submit comments to [email protected] which will be provided to the Board and submitted into the record . WORK SESSION: 5:00 PM Work Sessions are an opportunity for Board members to discuss issues informally with staff and invited guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker County Transportation System Plan
    FINAL Baker County Transportation System Plan Prepared for Baker County, Oregon and Oregon Department of Transportation Prepared by H. Lee & Associates June 30,2005 This project was finded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management Program (TGM), a jointprogram of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Department of Land Conservation and Development. TGM grants rely on federal Internodal Sui$ace Transportation Eficiency Act and Oregon Lottely Funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the State of Oregon. BAKER COUNTY FINAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Prepared for: Baker County and Oregon Department of Transportation Prepared by: H. Lee & Associates P.O. Box 1849 Vancouver, WA 98668 (360) 567-3002 June 30,2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 .WTRODUCTZON ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Requirements ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Planning Area ................................................................................................................ 1-4 1.3 Planning Process ........................................................................................................... 1-7 1.4 Other Planning Considerations ..................................................................................... 1-9 2-1 SECTlON 2 .TRANSPORTATION . GOALS AND POLICIES ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis & Clark Map No K.Indd
    Y a Y Y k 49 a i 43 a The Corps established a defensive position here on both the Named for the Corps' Private Jean Baptiste k m Rock Fort Campsite LePage Park W A N A P U M k 43 49 i 43 The Corps established a defensive position here on both the 49 Named for the Corps' Private Jean Baptiste im a Rock Fort Campsite The Corps established a defensive position here on both the LePage Park Named for the Corps' Private Jean Baptiste W A N A P U M m R. 395 a R outbound and return journeys. Interpretive signs. LePage, whose name Lewis & Clark gave to today's John Day River. R. 182 395 outbound and return journeys. Interpretive signs. LePage, whose name Lewis & Clark gave to today's John Day River. 82 182 v e r Interpretive sign. 82 182 k e R i v e r Interpretive sign. a k e R i v Interpretive sign. 12 n a k 240 PASCO S n 44 The Dalles Murals At several locations in the downtown area, large murals depict PASCO 12 S 44 The Dalles Murals At several locations in the downtown area, large murals depict 240 S Lewis & Clark's arrival and the Indian trading center at Celilo. 50 Crow Butte Park The Corps camped nearby, traveling by 60 Lewis & Clark's arrival and the Indian trading center at Celilo. 50 Crow Butte Park The Corps camped nearby, traveling by 60 horseback on the return jouney, long before dam flooding created 16-17 Oct.
    [Show full text]