DOCSLIB.ORG

The Trial Chamber Found Krstić

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Trial Chamber Found Krstić UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-98-33-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 02 August 2001 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge Almiro Rodrigues, Presiding Judge Fouad Riad Judge Patricia Wald Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis PROSECUTOR v. RADISLAV KRSTIC JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Mark Harmon Mr. Peter McCloskey Mr. Andrew Cayley Ms. Magda Karagiannakis Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Nenad Petrušic Mr. Tomislav Višnji} Case No.: IT-98-33-T 2 August 2001 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 II. FINDINGS OF FACT..................................................................................................................3 A. THE TAKE-OVER OF SREBRENICA AND ITS AFTERMATH..............................................................3 1. 1991-92: The Break-Up of the Former Yugoslavia................................................................3 2. 1992-1993: Conflict in Srebrenica..........................................................................................4 3. April 1993: The Security Council Declares Srebrenica a “Safe Area”...................................6 4. Early 1995: The Situation in the Srebrenica “Safe Area” Deteriorates ..................................9 5. Spring 1995: The Bosnian Serbs Plan To Attack the Srebrenica “Safe Area”.....................10 6. 6-11 July 1995: The Take-Over of Srebrenica......................................................................11 7. The Bosnian Muslim Civilians of Srebrenica........................................................................12 (a) The Crowd at Poto~ari ....................................................................................................... 12 (i) The Humanitarian Crisis in Poto~ari: 11-13 July 1995 ................................................... 13 (ii) 12-13 July: Crimes Committed in Poto~ari.................................................................... 13 (iii) 12-13 July 1995: The Transport of the Bosnian Muslim Women Children and Elderly from Potocari................................................................................................................ 15 (iv) The Separation of the Bosnian Muslim Men in Poto~ari................................................ 16 (b) The Column of Bosnian Muslim Men ................................................................................ 18 8. The Execution of the Bosnian Muslim Men from Srebrenica ...............................................20 9. Forensic Evidence of the Executions.....................................................................................21 10. The Number of Men Executed by the Bosnian Serb Forces Following the Take-over of Srebrenica in July 1995.......................................................................................................25 11. A Plan to Execute the Bosnian Muslim Men of Srebrenica.................................................27 12. Widespread Knowledge of the Crimes.................................................................................28 13. The Impact of the Crimes on the Bosnian Muslim Community of Srebrenica....................29 14. Conclusions..........................................................................................................................31 B. THE ROLE OF THE DRINA CORPS IN THE SREBRENICA CRIMES...................................................32 1. Preliminary Matters................................................................................................................32 (a) Background to the Drina Corps .......................................................................................... 32 (b) Codes and Numbers Used by the Drina Corps in July 1995 ................................................ 33 (c) Reliability of Intercepted Communications ........................................................................ 34 2. Krivaja 95...............................................................................................................................39 (a) The Objective of Krivaja 95............................................................................................... 39 (b) The Shelling of Srebrenica: Terrorisation of the Civilian Population.................................. 40 3. Involvement of Drina Corps Personnel in the Events at Poto~ari: 11-13 July 1995.............42 (a) Transport of the Bosnian Muslim Civilians out of Poto~ari................................................. 42 (i) Meeting at Hotel Fontana on 11 July 1995 at 2000 Hours ............................................... 42 (ii) Meeting at the Hotel Fontana on 11 July 1995 at 2300 Hours......................................... 43 (iii) Meeting at the Hotel Fontana on 12 July 1995 at 1000 Hours ....................................... 44 (iv) Organisation of the Buses ............................................................................................. 45 (v) The Presence of Drina Corps Officers in Poto~ari on 12 and 13 July 1995 ..................... 47 (vi) A Forced or Voluntary Movement?............................................................................... 48 (b) The Crimes Committed in Poto~ari on 12-13 July 1995 ..................................................... 50 (c) The Separation of the Men in Poto~ari ............................................................................... 53 4. Involvement of the Drina Corps in Action against the Bosnian Muslim Column.................56 (a) Combat against the Column ............................................................................................... 57 (b) Capture of Bosnian Muslim Men from the Column............................................................ 59 (i) General Knowledge that Bosnian Muslim Men were Being Captured from the Column.. 59 (ii) 13 July 1995: Participation in the Capture of Prisoners along the Bratunac-Konjevi} Polje Road .................................................................................................................... 60 Case No.: IT-98-33-T 2 August 2001 (iii) 12-15 July 1995: Involvement with the Detention of Bosnian Muslim Prisoners in Bratunac ....................................................................................................................... 64 (iv) 13-16 July 1995: Zvornik Brigade Knowledge of Bosnian Muslim Prisoners detained in its Zone of Responsibility ......................................................................................... 67 (v) Capture of Prisoners during Drina Corps Sweep Operation in the Former Enclave ......... 68 5. Involvement of the Drina Corps in the Mass Executions.......................................................69 (a) The Morning of 13 July 1995: Jadar River Executions ...................................................... 69 (b) The Afternoon of 13 July 1995: Cerska Valley Executions................................................ 71 (c) Late Afternoon of 13 July 1995: Kravica Warehouse ........................................................ 72 (d) 13-14 July 1995: Tišca...................................................................................................... 76 (e) 14 July 1995: Grbavci School Detention Site and Orahovac Execution site ....................... 77 (f) 14 - 15 July 1995: Petkovci School Detention Site and Petkovci Dam Execution Site ......... 81 (g) 14 - 16 July 1995: Pilica School Detention Site and Branjevo Military Farm Execution Site ................................................................................................................................... 83 (h) 16 July 1995: Pilica Cultural Dom ..................................................................................... 87 (i) Kozluk................................................................................................................................ 89 (j) Smaller Scale Executions following the Mass Executions ................................................... 91 (k) The Reburials .................................................................................................................... 92 6. The Chain of Command in Operation for the Drina Corps: July 1995..................................93 (a) Parallel Chains of Command.............................................................................................. 93 (i) Did the VRS Main Staff exclude the Drina Corps Command from the Srebrenica Follow-up Operations? ................................................................................................. 94 (ii) Were the Security Organs Operating in Secret?.............................................................. 99 (iii) Conclusions................................................................................................................ 100 (b) Responsibility of the Drina Corps Command for the Actions of Non-Drina Corps Units Operating in the Drina Corps Area of Responsibility in July 1995................................... 101 (i) The 10th Sabotage Detachment...................................................................................... 101 (ii) The 65th Protection Regiment ...................................................................................... 103 (iii) The MUP...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project SUN: a Study of the Illicit Cigarette Market In
    Project SUN A study of the illicit cigarette market in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland 2017 Results Executive Summary kpmg.com/uk Important notice • This presentation of Project SUN key findings (the ‘Report’) has been prepared by KPMG LLP the UK member firm (“KPMG”) for the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI), described in this Important Notice and in this Report as ‘the Beneficiary’, on the basis set out in a private contract dated 27 April 2018 agreed separately by KPMG LLP with the Beneficiary (the ‘Contract’). • Included in the report are a number of insight boxes which are written by RUSI, as well as insights included in the text. The fieldwork and analysis undertaken and views expressed in these boxes are RUSI’s views alone and not part of KPMG’s analysis. These appear in the Foreword on page 5, the Executive Summary on page 6, on pages 11, 12, 13 and 16. • Nothing in this Report constitutes legal advice. Information sources, the scope of our work, and scope and source limitations, are set out in the Appendices to this Report. The scope of our review of the contraband and counterfeit segments of the tobacco market within the 28 EU Member States, Switzerland and Norway was fixed by agreement with the Beneficiary and is set out in the Appendices. • We have satisfied ourselves, so far as possible, that the information presented in this Report is consistent with our information sources but we have not sought to establish the reliability of the information sources by reference to other evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Srebrenica - Intro ENG.Qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1
    srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 2 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Bridging the Gap conference in Srebrenica would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of many people and agencies. Our thanks to all those that made this remarkable series possible. Appreciation is expressed to the Helsinki Committee in Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Their commitment to truth-seeking and upholding basic human values, often in the face of hostility, is acknowledged. The event was generously supported by the Neighbourhood Programme of the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Heartfelt appreciation is extended to those people most affected by the crimes addressed at the conference. Without their bravery, nothing could be accomplished. ii Bridging the Gap between the ICTY and communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 A publication of the Communications Service, Registry, ICTY Contents Editor: Liam McDowall Graphics Editor: Leslie Hondebrink-Hermer Contributors: Ernesa Begi}-Ademagi}, Rebecca Cuthill, Matias Hellman, James Landale, Natalie O’Brien Printed by Albani drukkers, The Hague, Netherlands 2009 SREBRENICA srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 3 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Table of contents Map
    [Show full text]
  • Javni Poziv Fmroi 2019 – Konačna Rang Lista Potencijalnih Korisnika Za Rekonstrukciju Stambenih Objekata – Grad Bijeljina
    JAVNI POZIV FMROI 2019 – KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA ZA REKONSTRUKCIJU STAMBENIH OBJEKATA – GRAD BIJELJINA Red.br. Ime i prezime Adresa sanacije/Sadašnja adresa Broj bodova 1. Kasić (Mujo) Avdulaziz Braće Lazić 227, Bijeljina 220 Braće Lazić 227, Bijeljina 2. Alijević (Ruždija) Šefik Nikole Tesle 23, Bijeljina 210 1. maj 31, Janja 3. Bilalić (Mehmed) Vahidin Drinska 107, Janja 210 Drinska 107, Janja 4. Halilović Admir Mehmed N.Tesle bb Bijeljina 200 Mula Alije Sadikovića 21 Bijeljina 5. Krivić (Ramo) Enes Dž. Bijedića 15, Bijeljina 200 Dž. Bijedića 15, Bijeljina 6. Krilašević (Osman) Mevludin I.L. Ribara 15, Bijeljina 200 Bobarovača 15, Bijeljina 7. Osmanović (Zinija) Adi Jurija Gagarina 39, Bijeljina 200 Jurija Gagarina 39, Bijeljina 8. Sivčević (Ohran) Osman Đorđa Vasića 41, Janja 200 Brzava 77, Janja 9. Spahić (Nedžib) Mensur Braće Lazić 203, Bijeljina 190 Braće Lazić 203, Bijeljina 10. Alibegović (Ibrahim) Sakib M.M. Dizdara 63, Bijeljina 190 M.M. Dizdara 63, Bijeljina 11. Pobrklić (Jusuf) Mensur Braće Lazić bb, Janja 180 Dž. Bijedića 36, Janja 12. Hrustić (Omer) Sead 24. Septembar 14, Bijeljina 180 24. Septembar 14, Bijeljina 13. Godušić (Ragib) Nešat M.M. Dizdara 19A, Bijeljina 180 M.M. Dizdara 19A, Bijeljina 14. Demirović (Emin) Mustafa Desanke Maksimović 46, Bijeljina 180 Desanke Maksimović 46, Bijeljina 15. Karjašević (Huso) Ahmed Mlade Bosne 5, Bijeljina 180 Mlade Bosne 5, Bijeljina 16. Tuzlaković (Muhamed) Emir Miloša Obilića 104, Bijeljina 180 Miloša Obilića 106, Bijeljina 17. Bajrić (Alija) Mujo D. Tucovića 32, Bijeljina 180 D. Tucovića 32, Bijeljina 18. Osmanagić (Mustafa) Omer Brzava 119, Bijeljina 170 Brzava 119, Bijeljina 19.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARMY LAWYER Headquarters, Department of the Army
    THE ARMY LAWYER Headquarters, Department of the Army Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-50-366 November 2003 Articles Military Commissions: Trying American Justice Kevin J. Barry, Captain (Ret.), U.S. Coast Guard Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have “Full and Fair” Trials: A Rebuttal to Military Commissions: Trying American Justice Colonel Frederic L. Borch, III Editorial Comment: A Response to Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have “Full and Fair” Trials Kevin J. Barry, Captain (Ret.), U.S. Coast Guard Afghanistan, Quirin, and Uchiyama: Does the Sauce Suit the Gander Evan J. Wallach Note from the Field Legal Cultures Clash in Iraq Lieutenant Colonel Craig T. Trebilcock The Art of Trial Advocacy Preparing the Mind, Body, and Voice Lieutenant Colonel David H. Robertson, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center & School, U.S. Army CLE News Current Materials of Interest Editor’s Note An article in our April/May 2003 Criminal Law Symposium issue, Moving Toward the Apex: New Developments in Military Jurisdiction, discussed the recent ACCA and CAAF opinions in United States v. Sergeant Keith Brevard. These opinions deferred to findings the trial court made by a preponderance of the evidence to resolve a motion to dismiss, specifically that the accused obtained and presented forged documents to procure a fraudulent discharge. Since the publication of these opinions, the court-matial reached the ultimate issue of the guilt of the accused on remand. The court-martial acquitted the accused of fraudulent separation and dismissed the other charges for lack of jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Pleading of the Republic of Croatia
    international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA anneXes volume 2 30 august 2012 international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA anneXes volume 2 30 august 2012 ii iii CONTENTS annex 1: supreme martial court, ii K no. 111/92, 7 may 1992, decision 1 annex 2: photo of victims of vukovar, 18 november 1991, in the article by savo ©trbac, ZloËini nad Srbima na prostoru Hrvatske u periodu 1990-1999 [crimes against serbs on the territory of croatia in the period 1990-1999] 5 annex 3: official record of the statement made by a.a., 10 July 2012 6 annex 4: statement of 7 annex 5: statement of 9 annex 6: criminal complaint lodged by the independent associa- tion of Journalists in serbia with the office of the War crimes prosecutor, 1 July 2009 12 annex 7: programme statement of the management Board of radio television serbia, 23 may 2011 14 annex 8: peace initiative of the president of the republic of croatia, dr. franjo tuman, Zagreb, 1 november 1993 16 annex 9: record of the statement of i.B., 20 april 2012 19 annex 10: rsK, ministry of the interior, state security department, doc. no. 08/2-0-1224/95, Knin, 8 June 1995, with excerpt from the Weekly civilian affairs report 30 annex 11: un, coded cable from akashi to Kofi annan, meeting in Knin, 1 august 1995 32 annex 12: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by J.K., october 1995 39 annex 13: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by m.m., January 1996 40 annex 14: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by s.p., January 1996 42 annex 15: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by s.g., february 1996 43 annex 16: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by Æ.J., october 1995 44 annex 17: official note of the statement by d.–.
    [Show full text]
  • Deterring Wartime Atrocities Deterring Wartime Jacqueline R
    Deterring Wartime Atrocities Deterring Wartime Jacqueline R. Atrocities McAllister Hard Lessons from the Yugoslav Tribunal How can the interna- tional community deter government and rebel forces from committing atroc- ities against civilians? Long after liberated Nazi concentration camp survivors held up the ªrst sign declaring, “Never Again!” civilians have faced genocide during civil wars around the world, from Bangladesh to the former Yugoslavia, and more recently in northern Iraq. Sexual violence, torture, and forced dis- appearances are among the other horrors that civilians continue to endure in wartime. In the 1990s, international ofªcials sought to respond to such suffering by es- tablishing a new generation of wartime international criminal tribunals (ICTs), starting with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1993. The ICTY paved the way for the establishment of the perma- nent International Criminal Court (ICC) ªve years later. Unlike earlier ICTs in Nuremberg and Tokyo, as well as more recent war crimes tribunals in Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, East Timor, Lebanon, Bosnia, and Kosovo, the ICTY and the ICC are mandated to prosecute international criminal law violations committed in the context of active armed conºicts. In granting the ICTY and the ICC such authority, their founders hoped that the tribu- nals would deter combatants in those conºicts from perpetrating violence against civilians.1 Nevertheless, more than twenty-ªve years after the ICTY opened its doors, international justice scholars continue to debate the role of wartime tribunals in deterring atrocities against civilians, particularly in ongoing conºicts. Skep- tics contend that, in the heat of battle, combatants are unlikely to perceive a Jacqueline R.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina O O Indictment
    Sud £¡H / Cyfl GnX Kfivicno cdjeljenje ¡ Apelaciono odjeljenj«/ KpMBKSHo cftjejo€hbe K Ane/ia^hoHO OAfefbert* Odjcl I i Oc je III / Ofljs/i I * Ofl|»/i II Odsjek za sudsfcu upravu/Oflejes 33 cy/^cicy ynpsoy BOSNIA AND HERZEGO PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BIH fflGWJ) U^/vfA q^ SARAJEVO Number: KT-RZ-10/05 Sarajevo, 12 December 2005 COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - Preliminary Hearing Judge - Pursuant to Article 35 (2) (h) and Article 226 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code of BiH, I hereby issue the O INDICTMENT AGAINST: 1. STUPAR MILOS, a.k.a. "MISO", son of Slavojka (maiden name Ninic), born 7 December 1963 in TiSci, Sekovici where he is holding permanent residence, of Serb ethnicity, citizen of BiH, police officer, married, father of four children, served the Army in 1982 in Nis, average financial situation, with no previous conviction, criminal proceedings are being conducted against him for a criminal offence of light bodily injury, currently under custody by the Decision of the Court of BiH number: X-KRN-05/25 to last until 22 December 2005 at 11:00 hrs, 2. TRIFUNOVlt MILENKO, a.k.a "COP", son of Ivan and Milojka Obradovic, O born 7 January 1968 in the village of Kostolomci, Srebrenica Municipality, residing in Skelani bb in his private house, of Serb ethnicity, citizen of BiH, JMBG: 0701967183154, trader, unemployed, completed Vocational Trade School, married, father of two minor children, expecting a newborn child, served the Army in 1987 in Pec and Prizren, with no military rank or medal, registered in military records of Srebrenica, indigent financial situation, no other criminal proceedings are being conducted against him, with no previous conviction, currently under custody by the Decision of the Court of BiH to last until 22 December 2005 at 11:00 hrs, 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Srebrenica Drina Euroregion
    P a g e | 1 MASTER PLAN SREBRENICA DRINA EUROREGION P a g e | 2 Contents MASTER PLAN.................................................................................................................................... 1 SREBRENICA DRINA EUROREGION............................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction - Starting points .............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Members of project team and their assignments ........................................................................ 4 2. Analysis of the current situation ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1 General information...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Relief ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3. Accessibility to destination .......................................................................................................... 8 2.4. SWOT analysis ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.4.1 Analysis of strengths ............................................................................................................ 10 2.4.2 Analysis of weaknesses - opportunities for investors .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg Stephen J
    University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 46 | Issue 3 Article 4 5-2017 A Court Pure and Unsullied: Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg Stephen J. Sfekas Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Part of the Fourteenth Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Sfekas, Stephen J. (2017) "A Court Pure and Unsullied: Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 46 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol46/iss3/4 This Peer Reviewed Articles is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Review by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COURT PURE AND UNSULLIED: JUSTICE IN THE JUSTICE TRIAL AT NUREMBERG* Hon. Stephen J. Sfekas** Therefore, O Citizens, I bid ye bow In awe to this command, Let no man live Uncurbed by law nor curbed by tyranny . Thus I ordain it now, a [] court Pure and unsullied . .1 I. INTRODUCTION In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the common understanding was that the Nazi regime had been maintained by a combination of instruments of terror, such as the Gestapo, the SS, and concentration camps, combined with a sophisticated propaganda campaign.2 Modern historiography, however, has revealed the
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA May, 2014 BASIC INFORMATION Project Title Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP BiH) and Development of the Fifth National Report to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) Project Acronym NBSAP BiH Project Duration Period January 2013 – December 2014 GEF Implementation United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP Agency GEF Operational Focal Point Senad Oprašić, PhD, Head of the Environmental Protection for Bosnia and Herzegovina Department at the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina (MoFTER BiH) UNCBD Focal Point for BiH Mehmed Cero, M. Sc., Assistant Minister in the Environment Sector of the FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MoET FBiH) 2 Client: FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism Supported by: United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP External Associate Experts: Senka Barudanović Stjepan Matić Radoslav Dekić Dragojla Golub Consultant: Centre for Energy, Environment and Resources (CENER 21) Translation and Proofreading: Gordana Lonco Edina Dmitrović Graphic Design: Tarik Hodžić 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank the following institutions for the support that they provided in the development of the Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) and through their participation in workshops, provision of data, information, comments and suggestions: Aarhus Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Ceylon Government
    THE CEYLON GOVERNMENT No. 8,739-FRIDAY, APRIL 25, 1941. Published by Authority. PART I —GENERAL. ■ {Separate paging is given to each Part in order that it nwy-.ba^filed separately.) ,iT* ’’ " PAGE PAGE . 4§6 Proclamations by the Governor Municipal Council Notices . 495 Appointments by the Governor X ' 486 A- Notices calling for Tendeis . 496 Appointments, &c., of Registrars A . 487 IA “ Excise Ordinance ” Notices Government Notifications . 1 ■' . 487 Sales of Toll and Other Rents Revenue and Expenditure Returns r .. — Notices to Mariners Currency Commissioners’ Notices -A’ . — Patents Notifications Unofficial Announcements * . 492 Road Committee Notices .. r .. Miscellaneous Departmental Notices 492 Trade Mark Notifications .. - 494 Meteorological Returns Local Government Notices .. 495 Books registered under Ordinance No. 1 of 1885 SUPPLEMENT (1) List of Registrars of Births and Deaths in Ceylon (under the Births and Deaths Registration Ordinance) holding office on January 1, 1941. (2) List of Registrars of General Marriages m Ceylon (under the Marriage Registration Ordinance) holding office on January 1, 1941 (3) List of Registrars of Kandyan Marriages m Ceylon (under the Kandyan Marriage Ordinance) holding office on January 1, 1941. (4) List of Officiating Priests m Ceylon (under the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Registration Ordinance) holding office on January 1, 1941. (3) List of alfBuildings registered for the solemnization of Christian Marriages and not cancelled up to January 1, 1941. PRINTED AT THE CEYLON GOVERNMENT PRESS, COLOMBO. 4 8 5 -------- J. N A 2921-985 (4/41) A 1 486 Part I. (General) — CEYLON GOVERNMENT GAZETTE — April 25, 1941 PROCLAMATIONS BY TflE GOVERNOR. No. 229 o f 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Investigation of the Cerska Grave Site William
    01493690 FORENSIC INVESПGA ПОN OF ТНЕ CERSKA GRAVE SIТE BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ~ ~ Excavadon: July 7, 1996 through July 18, 1996 Examination: July 31, 1996 through August 22, 1996 1 VOLUMEI 1 1 1 WiШam Haglund, Ph.D. 1 Senior Forensic Advisor Intemational Criminal Tribunal for the Foпner Yugoslavia 1 and the Staff of Phys:idans for Human Rights, Boston Е t June 15, 1998 Е Phys:iclans for Human Rights 1 100 Boylston Street, Suite 702 Boston, Musadausetts 02116 USA Tel. (617) 695-0041 1 Fax. ( бl 7) 695-0307 E-mail: [email protected] 1 http://www.phmsa.org 1. Е 1 ... " 01493691 Table of Contents с VOLUMEI 1. EXECUТIVE SUMMARY ..... ..... .......... ...................... vii 1. 11 INТRODUCПON ........................ ............................ 1 111. SIТE REPORT: EXCAVATION AND EXНUMAТION OF ТНЕ CERSКA ........ 2 1 А. General Methods .......................... .. ... .. ............ 2 1. Mapping ......................... .......... .- ........... 2 2. Photography ......... .................................. З 1 З. Evidence ............................. ............ ...... 4 В . Field Report: Exhumation of the Cerska Grave . ...... .. ...... .......... 5 1. Site Description . ............ .................. .. .. .. 5 1 2. Site Preparation .......... ..... ... .... .. ..... ...... .... 5 З. Recovery of Surface Evidence ... .. ...... .. .. ... .. 5 1 4. Excavation ....................... ..... ..... ..... .... 11 5. Exhumation ................................. ........... 11 6. Comments оп Excavation lssues .. ... .......... ....... .. 23
    [Show full text]