Aa2018-6 Aircraft Accident Investigation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aa2018-6 Aircraft Accident Investigation Report AA2018-6 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT PRIVATELY OWNED J A 3 9 8 9 August 30, 2018 The objective of the investigation conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in accordance with the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board and with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation is to determine the causes of an accident and damage incidental to such an accident, thereby preventing future accidents and reducing damage. It is not the purpose of the investigation to apportion blame or liability. Kazuhiro Nakahashi Chairman Japan Transport Safety Board Note: This report is a translation of the Japanese original investigation report. The text in Japanese shall prevail in the interpretation of the report. AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT CRASH INTO THE VICINITY OF THE MOUNTAINTOP NEW CENTRAL AIRSERVICE CO., LTD. CESSNA 172P, JA3989 ASHIKURAJI, TATEYAMA TOWN, NAKANIIKAWA DISTRICT, TOYAMA PREFECTURE, JAPAN AT AROUND 14:50 JST, JUNE 3, 2017 August 10, 2018 Adopted by the Japan Transport Safety Board Chairman Kazuhiro Nakahashi Member Toru Miyashita Member Toshiyuki Ishikawa Member Yuichi Marui Member Keiji Tanaka Member Miwa Nakanishi SYNOPSIS <Summary of the Accident> On Saturday, June 3, 2017, a Cessna 172P, registered JA3989, operated by New Central Airservice Co.,Ltd., took off from Toyama Airport, while flying to Matsumoto Airport, at around 14:50 Japan Standard Time (JST: UTC+9 hours, unless otherwise stated all times are indicated in JST), it crashed into the vicinity of the top of Mt. Shishi-dake (elevation about 2,700 m) in the Tateyama Mountain Range. There were four people on board the Aircraft consisting of a PIC, a pilot and two passengers and all of them were fatally injured. The aircraft was destroyed but there was no outbreak of fire. <Probable Cause> It is probable that as the Aircraft got into clouds during VFR flight over the mountain region, it became difficult for the PIC and the Pilot to grasp its own position and surroundings by confirming visually the terrain, then, the Aircraft approached the vicinity of the mountaintop and crashed into it. It is somewhat likely that the Aircraft approached the vicinity of the mountaintop and crashed into it due to loss of visual contacts making the crash unavoidable, or due to failure to maintain minimum safe altitude caused by the Aircraft icing or stalled condition, or due to encountering a severe turbulence. However, it could not be determined, since the PIC and all members on board were fatally injured. Concerning the fact that the Aircraft came to fly into clouds, it is probable that the PIC and the Pilot had not confirmed thoroughly the weather forecast for the mountainous region before departure and they delayed in making a decision to turn back during flight. <Recommendations> Recommendations for the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism In this accident, it is probable that as the Aircraft got into clouds during VFR flight over the mountain region, it became difficult for the Aircraft to grasp its own position and the surroundings by confirming visually the terrain, then, the Aircraft approached the vicinity of the mountaintop and crashed into it. It is somewhat likely that the Aircraft approached the vicinity of the mountaintop and crashed into it due to loss of visual contacts making the crash unavoidable, or due to failure to maintain minimum safe altitude caused by the Aircraft icing or stalled condition, or due to encountering a severe turbulence. Concerning the fact that the Aircraft came to fly into clouds, it is probable that the PIC and the Pilot had not confirmed thoroughly the weather forecast for the mountainous region before departure and they delayed in making a decision to turn back during flight. In view of the result of this accident investigation, the Japan Transport Safety Board recommends pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board that the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism should take the following measures in order to prevent the aircraft accidents and reduce damage from those when they occur. (1) Make it known to pilots that the icing conditions are extremely hazardous for the aircraft not certificated for flight in icing conditions and those aircraft should definitely avoid flying in icing conditions. (2) Encourage pilots for small airplanes to fasten their seat belts and shoulder harnesses and instruct them to ask their passengers to fasten their seat belts. (3) Provide small aircraft users with the information on the appropriate installation and operation of the ELTs. (4) Request relevant organizations to ensure that each search and rescue (SAR) aircraft during SAR operation shall be able to precisely listen on the distress frequencies. The main abbreviations used in this report are as follows: ADF: Automatic Direction Finder AIP: Aeronautical Information Publication ARSR: Air Route Surveillance Radar ELT: Emergency Locator Transmitter GPS: Global Positioning System IAS: Indicated Airspeed ICAO: International Civil Aviation Organization IMC: Instrument Meteorological Conditions LWC: Liquid Water Content PIC: Pilot In Command POH: Pilot’s Operating Handbook RCC: Rescue Coordination Center TAS: True Airspeed VFR: Visual Flight Rules VMC: Visual Meteorological Conditions Unit Conversion List: 1 kt: 1.852 km/h (0.5144 m/s) 1 nm: 1,852 m 1 ft: 0.3048 m 1 in: 25.40 mm 1 lb: 0.4536 kg TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROCESS AND PROGRESS OF THE INVESTIGATION............................................................. 1 1.1 Summary of the Accident .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Outline of the Accident Investigation ........................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Investigation Organization .................................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Representatives of the Relevant State .................................................................................. 1 1.2.3 Implementation of the Investigation .................................................................................... 1 1.2.4 Comments from the Parties Relevant to the Cause of the Accident ................................... 1 1.2.5 Comments from the Relevant State ...................................................................................... 2 2 FACTUAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 2 2.1 History of the Flight ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 History of the Flight and Situation after the Accident ........................................................ 2 2.1.2 Statements of Relevant Persons ............................................................................................ 4 2.2 Injuries to Peoples ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Damage to the Aircraft .................................................................................................................. 6 2.3.1 Extent of Damage ................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.2 Damage to the Aircraft Components ..................................................................................... 6 2.4 Personnel Information ................................................................................................................... 7 2.5 Aircraft Information ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.5.1 Aircraft .................................................................................................................................... 7 2.5.2 Engine ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.5.3 Weight and Balance ................................................................................................................ 8 2.5.4 Fuel and Lubricating Oil ........................................................................................................ 8 2.6 Meteorological Information ........................................................................................................... 8 2.6.1 Meteorological Conditions at Airports .................................................................................. 8 2.6.2 Meteorological Conditions along the Flight Route ............................................................... 9 2.7 Information on Accident Site and the Aircraft .......................................................................... 16 2.7.1 Situation of Accident Site ..................................................................................................... 16 2.7.2 Situation of the Aircraft ....................................................................................................... 17 2.7.3 Detailed Situation of Damage.............................................................................................. 18 2.8 Medical Information .................................................................................................................... 20 2.9 Information on Communication
Recommended publications
  • Catalogue Pilot Film & Television Productions Ltd
    productions 2020 Catalogue Pilot Film & Television Productions Ltd. is a leading international television production company with an outstanding reputation for producing and distributing innovative factual entertainment, history and travel led programmes. The company was set up by Ian Cross in 1988; and it is now one of the longest established independent production companies under continuous ownership in the United Kingdom. Pilot has produced over 500 hours of multi-genre programming covering subjects as diverse as history, food and sport. Its award winning Globe Trekker series, broadcast in over 20 countries, has a global audience of over 20 million. Pilot Productions has offices in London and Los Angeles. CONTENTS Mission Statement 3 In Production 4 New 6 Tough Series 8 Travelling in the 1970’s 10 Specials 11 Empire Builders 12 Ottomans vs Christians 14 History Specials 18 Historic Walks 20 Metropolis 21 Adventure Golf 22 Great Railway Journeys of Europe 23 The Story Of... Food 24 Bazaar 26 Globe Trekker Seasons 1-5 28 Globe Trekker Seasons 6-11 30 Globe Trekker Seasons 12-17 32 Globe Trekker Specials 34 Globe Trekker Around The World 36 Pilot Globe Guides 38 Destination Guides 40 Other Programmes 41 Short Form Content 42 DVDs and music CDs 44 Study Guides 48 Digital 50 Books 51 Contacts 52 Presenters 53 2 PILOT PRODUCTIONS 2020 MISSION STATEMENT Pilot Productions seeks to inspire and educate its audience by creating powerful television programming. We take pride in respecting and promoting social, environmental and personal change, whilst encouraging others to travel and discover the world. Pilot’s programmes have won more than 50 international awards, including six American Cable Ace awards.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHAEL BONVILLAIN, ASC Director of Photography
    MICHAEL BONVILLAIN, ASC Director of Photography official website FEATURES (partial list) OUTSIDE THE WIRE Netflix Dir: Mikael Håfström AMERICAN ULTRA Lionsgate Dir: Nima Nourizadeh Trailer MARVEL ONE-SHOT: ALL HAIL THE KING Marvel Entertainment Dir: Drew Pearce ONE NIGHT SURPRISE Cathay Audiovisual Global Dir: Eva Jin HANSEL & GRETEL: WITCH HUNTERS Paramount Pictures Dir: Tommy Wirkola Trailer WANDERLUST Universal Pictures Dir: David Wain ZOMBIELAND Columbia Pictures Dir: Ruben Fleischer Trailer CLOVERFIELD Paramount Pictures Dir: Matt Reeves A TEXAS FUNERAL New City Releasing Dir: W. Blake Herron THE LAST MARSHAL Filmtown Entertainment Dir: Mike Kirton FROM DUSK TILL DAWN 3 Dimension Films Dir: P.J. Pesce AMONGST FRIENDS Fine Line Features Dir: Rob Weiss TELEVISION (partial list) PEACEMAKER (Season 1) HBO Max DIR: James Gunn WAYS & MEANS (Season 1) CBS EP: Mike Murphy, Ed Redlich HAP AND LEONARD (Season 3) Sundance TV, Netflix EP: Jim Mickle, Nick Damici, Jeremy Platt Trailer WESTWORLD (Utah; Season 1, 4 Episodes.) Bad Robot, HBO EP: Lisa Joy, Jonathan Nolan CHANCE (Pilot) Fox 21, Hulu EP: Michael London, Kem Nunn, Brian Grazer Trailer THE SHANNARA CHRONICLES MTV EP: Al Gough, Miles Millar, Jon Favreau (Pilot & Episode 102) FROM DUSK TIL DAWN (Season 1) Entertainment One EP: Juan Carlos Coto, Robert Rodriguez COMPANY TOWN (Pilot) CBS EP: Taylor Hackford, Bill Haber, Sera Gamble DIR: Taylor Hackford REVOLUTION (Pilot) NBC EP: Jon Favreau, Eric Kripke, Bryan Burk, J.J. Abrams DIR: Jon Favreau UNDERCOVERS (Pilot) NBC EP: J.J. Abrams, Bryan Burk, Josh Reims DIR: J.J. Abrams OUTLAW (Pilot) NBC EP: Richard Schwartz, Amanda Green, Lukas Reiter DIR: Terry George *FRINGE (Pilot) Fox Dir: J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Sos Stoolbox
    SOS 1 STOOLBOX SOS STOOLBOX Simple One Step (SOS) stool processing method and Xpert MTB/RIF (Ultra) testing for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance VARIABLES AND DATA COLLECTION FORMS SOS 2 STOOLBOX TABLE OF CONTENTS Minimum set of variables Example participant enrollment form Example laboratory form Example diagnosis form SOS 3 STOOLBOX Minimum set of variables In the table below, the minimum set of variables are listed that should be collected during the pilot implementation period of the SOS stool method for the detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. Note that pilot implementation is meant to test the SOS stool method in the country’s routine setting to learn more about the performance of the method in the context in which it will be used after scaling up to national level when the pilot has ended. A pilot implementation phase usually includes a limited number of health facilities and patients, and runs for a limited period of time. Variable Data type Explanation Data source Unique participant code Numerical A numerical code that uniquely identifies each To be assigned participant. In multicenter studies, this code should by the study/ contain information about the center. E.g., first digit pilot team for the center, last three digits for the participant – the 5th participant in center 8 gets code 8005. Date of enrollment Date This is the date that the clinician assessed the Patient register (or: date of first participants because of his/her TB suggestive diagnostic visit) complaints. Participant date of birth Date If this date is not available, then alternatively age in Patient register months (for participants aged <1 year) or years (for older participants) can be collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Stories
    PILOT STORIES DEDICATED to the Memory Of those from the GREATEST GENERATION December 16, 2014 R.I.P. Norm Deans 1921–2008 Frank Hearne 1924-2013 Ken Morrissey 1923-2014 Dick Herman 1923-2014 "Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of earth, And danced the skies on Wings of Gold; I've climbed and joined the tumbling mirth of sun-split clouds - and done a hundred things You have not dreamed of - wheeled and soared and swung high in the sunlit silence. Hovering there I've chased the shouting wind along and flung my eager craft through footless halls of air. "Up, up the long delirious burning blue I've topped the wind-swept heights with easy grace, where never lark, or even eagle, flew; and, while with silent, lifting mind I've trod the high untrespassed sanctity of space, put out my hand and touched the face of God." NOTE: Portions Of This Poem Appear On The Headstones Of Many Interred In Arlington National Cemetery. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – Dick Herman Bermuda Triangle 4 Worst Nightmare 5 2 – Frank Hearne Coming Home 6 3 – Lee Almquist Going the Wrong Way 7 4 – Mike Arrowsmith Humanitarian Aid Near the Grand Canyon 8 5 – Dale Berven Reason for Becoming a Pilot 11 Dilbert Dunker 12 Pride of a Pilot 12 Moral Question? 13 Letter Sent Home 13 Sense of Humor 1 – 2 – 3 14 Sense of Humor 4 – 5 15 “Poopy Suit” 16 A War That Could Have Started… 17 Missions Over North Korea 18 Landing On the Wrong Carrier 19 How Casual Can One Person Be? 20 6 – Gardner Bride Total Revulsion, Fear, and Helplessness 21 7 – Allan Cartwright A Very Wet Landing 23 Alpha Strike
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Operation Manual
    PILOT PEDAL-ASSISTED BICYCLE OPERATION MANUAL H1-26EC @RideHover1 @RideHover1 @RideHover1 www.Hover-1.com HELMETS SAVE LIVES! Always wear a properly tted helmet that complies with CPSC or CE safety standards when you ride your bicycle. Correct Fitting: Make sure your helmet covers your forehead. Incorrect Fitting: Forehead is exposed and vulnerable to serious injury. RIDE WITH CAUTION! WARNING As with all mechanical components, the Hover-1 Pilot is subjected to wear and high stresses. Dierent materials and components may react to wear or fatigue in dierent ways. If the design life of a component has been exceeded, it may suddenly fail possibly causing injuries to the rider. Any form of crack, scratch or change of coloring in highly stressed areas indicate that the life of the component has been reached and it should be replaced. Do not ride in an abusive manner. CAUTION In this manual, the CAUTION sign indicates a hazardous situation which, if not avoided, can cause minor or moderate injury. WARNING In this manual, the WARNING sign indicates a hazardous situation which, if not avoided, can cause death or serious injury. WARNING Great care should be taken when adjusting the bike hardware on the Hover-1. Pilot If you do not understand how to adjust the bicycle hardware, please contact your local bike specialist. DO NOT RIDE YOUR HOVER-1 PILOT WITHOUT ALL HARDWARE SECURELY FASTENED. INTRODUCTION This operation manual is designed to give you the information you need for the safe operation and maintenance of your new Hover-1 Pilot (referred to as “Pilot” from here on).
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Chart Rjaf / Matsumoto Matsumoto
    MATSUMOTO Civil Aviation Bureau,Japan Aviation Civil Japan AIP RJAF /MATSUMOTO MATSUMOTO AIRPORT ABN TRUE NORTH RADIO APRON FLOOD LIGHTS 6 7 8 45 334.7m 9 3 10 SOUTH APRON NORTH APRON 11 12 3 RUNWAY THRESHOLD 12 (EFF:7 APR 2011) APR (EFF:7 PAPI Angle 3.0 10/3/11 ° IDENTIFICATION LIGHTS MEHT 18.5m (61ft) N - T S - T CIRCLING GUIDANCE LIGHTS WDI WDI 2 1 6 1 5 2 4 3 4 5 6 18 36 6 1 5 2 4 3 3 4 2 5 1 6 OVERRUN LIGHTS ARP 361000N PAPI Angle 3.0 ° 1375522E MEHT 18.5m (61ft) 438.1m RUNWAY SIMPLE REMARKS : ALIGNMENT INDICATOR APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM APPROACH LIGHT BEACONS RUNWAY GROOVING 2000m x 45m RUNWAY STRENGTH 45 / F / B / X / T WIDTH & STRENGTH OF TAXIWAY S - T 23m 45 / F / B / X / T 18 36 N - T 9m AUW 5700kg DIMENSION & STRENGTH OF APRON SOUTH 90m x 135m 58 / R / B / X / T 480m 420m 300m 300m 300m NORTH 117m x 62m AUW 5700kg LONGITUDINAL PROFILE OF RUNWAY RWY18 RWY36 2170ft 2182ft 2132ft 2143ft (661.7m) (665.2m) (649.95m) (653.2m) RJAF-AD2-24.1 0.65% 0.85% 0.70% AD CHART 0m 500m 1500m 2000m RJAF-AD2-24.2 AIP Japan MATSUMOTO STANDARD DEPARTURE CHART-INSTRUMENT RJAF / MATSUMOTO SID MATSUMOTO REVERSAL ONE DEPARTURE RWY 18 : Climb RWY HDG to 2700FT, turn left HDG321˚ to intercept and proceed via MBE R006 to 5.0DME, turn right direct to MBE VOR/DME. Cross MBE R006/5.0DME at or above 6000FT, cross MBE VOR/DME at or above 10000FT.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Aircraft Accident and Serious Incident Investigations
    Chapter 3 Aircraft accident and serious incident investigations Chapter 3 Aircraft accident and serious incident investigations 1 Aircraft accidents and serious incidents to be investigated <Aircraft accidents to be investigated> ◎Paragraph 1, Article 2 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (Definition of aircraft accident) The term "Aircraft Accident" as used in this Act shall mean the accident listed in each of the items in paragraph 1 of Article 76 of the Civil Aeronautics Act. ◎Paragraph 1, Article 76 of the Civil Aeronautics Act (Obligation to report) 1 Crash, collision or fire of aircraft; 2 Injury or death of any person, or destruction of any object caused by aircraft; 3 Death (except those specified in Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) or disappearance of any person on board the aircraft; 4 Contact with other aircraft; and 5 Other accidents relating to aircraft specified in Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. ◎Article 165-3 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Civil Aeronautics Act (Accidents related to aircraft prescribed in the Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under item 5 of the paragraph1 of the Article 76 of the Act) The cases (excluding cases where the repair of a subject aircraft does not correspond to the major repair work) where navigating aircraft is damaged (except the sole damage of engine, cowling, engine accessory, propeller, wing tip, antenna, tire, brake or fairing). <Aircraft serious incidents to be investigated> ◎Item 2, Paragraph 2, Article 2 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (Definition of aircraft serious incident) A situation where a pilot in command of an aircraft during flight recognized a risk of collision or contact with any other aircraft, or any other situations prescribed by the Ordinances of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under Article 76-2 of the Civil Aeronautics Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (Rpas) Concept of Operations (Conops) for International Ifr Operations
    REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (RPAS) CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS (CONOPS) FOR INTERNATIONAL IFR OPERATIONS Disclaimer This document is an unedited version of an ICAO publication and has not yet been approved in final form. As its content may still be supplemented, removed, or otherwise modified during the editing process, ICAO shall not be responsible whatsoever for any costs or liabilities incurred as a result of its use. ICAO RPAS Concept of Operations Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem Statement ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 RPAS Operations ................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 RPAS Technology Aspects ..................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 Airspace aspects .................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Key Assumptions ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Damage Estimation on the Nankai Trough Megathrust
    The Damage Estimation onthen the Nankai Trough Megathrust Earthquake Disaster Management Bureau Cabinet Office, Government of Japan Number of Deaths and Missing Persons in Previous Disasters 25, 000 Great East Japan Earthquake (19,515) 20,000 1945 Mikawa Earthquake (2,306 ) 1945 Typhoon Makurazaki(3,756 ) 1946 Showa Nankai 1, Earthquake (443) 15,000 1947 Typhoon Kathleen(1,930) 1948 Fukui Earthquake (3,769) 1959 Typhoon Ise-wan(5,098 ) 10,000 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake (6,437) 1953 Torrential Rains in Nanki(1,124) 1954 Typhoon Touyamaru(1,761) 5,000 0 '45 '47 '49 '51 '53 '55 '57 '59 '61 '63 '65 '67 '69 '71 '73 '75 '77 '79 '81 '83 '85 '87 '89 '91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 (year) Source: Chronological Scientific Table Large Earthquakes Reviewed by the Central Disaster Management Council Super wide-area earthquake extending to western Japan Tokikai Eart hqua ke Huge tsunami over 20 meters Tonankai, Nankai Earthquake Rate of earthquake production over 30 years: Oceanic-type earthquakes 60 ~ 70% in the vicinity of the Japan and Chishima Trenches Concerns about neglected timber buildings and Unknown ( Miyagi offshore cultural assets earthquake production rate over 30 years: 99% prior to the Great East Cyubu region, Kinki region Japan Earthquake) Inland Earthquake Concern about critical national operations Tokyyqo Inland Earthquake Rate of earthquake production over 30 years: approx 70% (Magnitude 7 in southern Kanto area) Oceanic earthquake Inland earthquake Rate of earthquake occurrence is by Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Planning and Review for Countermeasures Against Earthquakes (1) Estimate distribution of seismic intensity, tsunami height, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ai2018-7 Aircraft Serious Incident Investigation Report
    AI2018-7 AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT FUJI DREAM AIRLINES CO., LTD. J A 0 6 F J November 29, 2018 The objective of the investigation conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in accordance with the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board and with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation is to prevent future accidents and incidents. It is not the purpose of the investigation to apportion blame or liability. Kazuhiro Nakahashi Chairman Japan Transport Safety Board AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT ABNORMAL DECOMPRESSION INSIDE AN AIRCRAFT AT AN ALTITUDE ABOUT 33,000 FT ABOVE SEA AT ABOUT 100 KM SOUTHWEST OF AKITA AIRPORT AT AROUND 15:24 JST, JULY 7, 2015 FUJI DREAM AIRLINES CO., LTD. EMBRAER ERJ170-200STD, JA06FJ November 29, 2018 Adopted by the Japan Transport Safety Board Chairman Kazuhiro Nakahashi Member Toru Miyashita Member Toshiyuki Ishikawa Member Yuichi Marui Member Keiji Tanaka Member Miwa Nakanishi 1. PROCESS AND PROGRESS OF INVESTIGATION 1.1 Summary of the On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, Embraer ERJ170-200STD, registered Serious Incident JA06FJ, operated by Fuji Dream Airlines CO., LTD. took off from New Chitose Airport bound for Matsumoto Airport as a scheduled flight 212. While the Aircraft was climbing in airspace approximately 33,000 ft at around 100 km southwest of Akita Airport, the supply of the bleed air stopped in both of the right and left systems and the cabin pressure lowered. The Aircraft declared the emergency to the Air Traffic Control Center (hereinafter referred to as “ATC”), and after making the emergency descent until the Aircraft reached 10,000 ft, the Aircraft landed Niigata Airport, which was not the destination.
    [Show full text]
  • The 6Th Special Operations Squadron and the Icarus Syndrome
    Ends Versus Means: The 6th Special Operations Squadron and the Icarus Syndrome by Wray R. Johnson, PhD Lieutenant Colonel, USAF "Why can’t they buy just one airplane and take turns flying it?" Calvin Coolidge In October 1994, Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) fielded the 6th Special Operations Squadron (6 SOS), the first-ever USAF squadron dedicated to the foreign internal defense (FID) and coalition support mission areas. In the Spring 1997 issue of Airpower Journal, the author of this study detailed the underlying concept and development of this unique squadron in an article entitled "Whither Aviation Foreign Internal Defense?", bemoaning the fact that only "two aged UH-1N helicopters— originally en route to the boneyard—have been assigned to the squadron."1 Now, over a year later, the 6 SOS remains equipped with these same helicopters.2 The question, then, is why? More importantly, what is the moral of the 6 SOS in terms of the larger implications for Air Force special operations forces (AFSOF) and the US Air Force? The answers to these questions are complex and not encouraging, but can be summed up in what RAND Corporation analyst Carl Builder termed the "Icarus Syndrome." In his controversial book of the same name, Builder argued that the Air Force has abandoned the concept of airpower as a unifying theory regarding the employment of the air weapon. Albeit limited in its classical sense to the independent and strategic employment of the inherently offensive nature of the airplane, original airpower theory at least provided a sense of purpose greater than simply satisfying the "aviator’s abiding love of flight and flying machines." According to Builder, "the theory of airpower—the idea of aviators unified in a cause much larger than themselves—was originally conceived around the airplane as a new means to broad and important ends." Today, however, this guiding principle has been turned on its head.
    [Show full text]