DOCSLIB.ORG

Army Weapons Systems 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Army Weapons Systems 2010 334 Appendices Army Combat Organizations Glossary of Terms Systems by Contractors Contractors by State Points of Contact UNITED STATES ARMY 335 Army Combat Organizations Army organizations are inherently built Squad Battalion around people and the tasks they must • Leader is a sergeant • Leader is a lieutenant colonel perform. Major combat organizations • Smallest unit in Army organization • Tactically and administratively self- are composed of smaller forces, as • Size varies depending on type: sufficient shown here. Infantry (9 Soldiers), Armor (4 • Armored Cavalry and Air Cavalry Soldiers), Engineer (10 Soldiers) equivalents are called squadrons • Three or four squads make up a • Two or more combat battalions make platoon up a brigade Platoon Brigade • Leader is a lieutenant • Leader is a colonel • Size varies: Infantry (40 Soldiers), • May be employed on independent or Armor (4 tanks, 16 Soldiers) semi-independent operations • Three or four platoons make up a • Combat, combat support, or service company support elements may be attached to perform specific missions Company • Normally three combat brigades are • Leader is a captain in a division • Usually up to 220 Soldiers • Artillery unit of this size is called a Division battery • Leader is a major general • Armored Cavalry or Air Cavalry unit • Fully structured division has own is called a troop brigade-size artillery, aviation, • Basic tactical element of the engineer, combat support, and maneuver battalion or cavalry service elements squadron • Two or more divisions make up a • Normally five companies make up a corps commanded by a lieutenant battalion general WEAPON SYSTEMS 2010 336 AIS definition, design, development, deployment, operations and maintenance, Glossary of Terms and incurred from the beginning of the Materiel Solution Analysis Phase through sustainment for the estimated useful life of the system. ACAT IA programs have two sub-categories: Acquisition Categories (ACAT) ACAT I programs are Milestone Decision Authority Programs (MDAPs [see also 1. ACAT IAM, for which the MDA is the Chief Information Officer (CIO) of the DoD, Major Defense Acquisition Program]) or programs designated ACAT I by the the ASD (C3I). The “M” refers to Major Automated Information System Review Milestone Decision Authority (MDA [see also Milestone Decision Authority]). Council (MAISRC). (Change 4, 5000.2-R) 2. ACAT IAC, for which the DoD CIO has delegated milestone decision authority to Dollar value: estimated by the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and the CAE or Component CIO. The “C” refers to Component. Technlogy) (USD [A&T]) to require an eventual total expenditure for research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) of more than $365 million in fiscal year (FY) 2000 constant dollars or, for procurement, of more than $2.190 billion ACAT II programs are defined as those acquisition programs that do not meet the in FY 2000 constant dollars. ACAT I programs have two sub-categories: criteria for an ACAT I program, but do meet the criteria for a major system, or are programs designated ACAT II by the MDA. 1. ACAT ID, for which the MDA is USD (A&T). The “D” refers to the Defense Acquisition Board (DAB), which advises the USD (A&T) at major decision ACAT III programs are defined as those acquisition programs that do not meet the points. criteria for an ACAT I, an ACAT IA, or an ACAT II. The MDA is designated by the 2. ACAT IC, for which the MDA is the DoD Component Head or, if delegated, the CAE and shall be at the lowest appropriate level. This category includes less-than- DoD Component Acquisition Executive (CAE). The “C” refers to Component. The major AISs. USD (A&T) designates programs as ACAT ID or ACAT IC. Acquisition Phase All the tasks and activities needed to bring a program to the next major milestone ACAT IA programs are MAISs (see also Major Automated Information System occur during an acquisition phase. Phases provide a logical means of progressively (MAIS) Acquisition Program), or programs designated by the Assistant Secretary translating broadly stated mission needs into well-defined system-specific of Defense for Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (ASD [C3I]) requirements and ultimately into operationally effective, suitable, and survivable to be ACAT IA. systems. The acquisition phases for the systems described in this handbook are defined below: Estimated to exceed: $32 million in FY 2000 constant dollars for all expenditures, for all increments, regardless of the appropriation or fund source, directly related Technology Development Phase to the AIS definition, design, development, and deployment, and incurred in any The purpose of this phase is to reduce technology risk, determine and mature single fiscal year; or $126 million in FY 2000 constant dollars for all expenditures, the appropriate set of technologies to be integrated into a full system, and to for all increments, regardless of the appropriation or fund source, directly related demonstrate critical technology elements on prototypes. Technology Development to the AIS definition, design, development, and deployment, and incurred from is a continuous technology discovery and development process reflecting close the beginning of the Materiel Solution Analysis Phase through deployment at collaboration between the Science and Technology (S&T) community, the user, all sites; or $378 million in FY 2000 constant dollars for all expenditures, for all and the system developer. It is an iterative process designed to assess the viability increments, regardless of the appropriation or fund source, directly related to the of technologies while simultaneously refining user requirements. Entrance into UNITED STATES ARMY 337 this phase depends on the completion of the Analysis of Alternatives (A0A), a Document (CPD); a refined integrated architecture; acceptable interoperability; proposed materiel solution, and full funding for planned Technology Development acceptable operational supportability; and demonstration that the system is Phase activity. affordable throughout the life cycle, fully funded, and properly phased for rapid acquisition. The CPD reflects the operational requirements, informed by EMD Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase results, and details the performance expected of the production system. If (Statutes applicable to the Systems Development and Demonstration phase shall Milestone C approves LRIP, a subsequent review and decision shall authorize full- be applicable to the EMD phase.) rate production. The purpose of the EMD phase is to develop a system or an increment of capability; Operations and Support Phase complete full system integration (technology risk reduction occurs during Technology The purpose of the Operations and Support phase is to execute a support program Development); develop an affordable and executable manufacturing process; ensure that meets materiel readiness and operational support performance requirements, operational supportability with particular attention to minimizing the logistics and sustains the system in the most cost-effective manner over its total life footprint; implement human systems integration (HSI); design for producibility; cycle. Planning for this phase shall begin prior to program initiation and shall be ensure affordability; protect critical program information by implementing appropriate documented in the Life-Cycle Sustainment Plan (LLSP). Operations and Support techniques such as anti-tamper; and demonstrate system integration, interoperability, has two major efforts: life-cycle sustainment and disposal. Entrance into the safety, and utility. The Capability Development Document, Acquisition Strategy, Operations and Support Phase depends on meeting the following criteria: an Systems Engineering Plan, and Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) shall approved CPD; an approved LCSP; and a successful Full-Rate Production (FRP) guide this effort. Entrance into this phase depends on technology maturity (including Decision. software), approved requirements, and full funding. Unless some other factor is overriding in its impact, the maturity of the technology shall determine the path to be Acquisition Program followed. A directed, funded effort designed to provide a new, improved or continuing weapons system or AIS capability in response to a validated operational need. Production and Deployment Phase Acquisition programs are divided into different categories that are established The purpose of the Production and Deployment phase is to achieve an operational to facilitate decentralized decision-making, and execution and compliance with capability that satisfies mission needs. Operational test and evaluation shall statutory requirements. determine the effectiveness and suitability of the system. The MDA shall make the decision to commit the DoD to production at Milestone C and shall document Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations (ACTDs) the decision in an Acquisition Decision Memorandum. Milestone C authorizes ACTDs are a means of demonstrating the use of emerging or mature technology entry into low rate initial production (for MDAPs and major systems), into to address critical military needs. ACTDs themselves are not acquisition production or procurement (for non-major systems that do not require LRIP) or programs, although they are designed to provide a residual, usable capability into limited deployment in support of operational testing for MAIS programs upon completion. If the user determines that additional units
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USARMY/NASA Redstone Arsenal, Superfund Site Profile
    USARMY/NASA REDSTONE ARSENAL | Superfund Site Profile | Superfund Site Information | US EPA Español 中中: 中中中 中中: 中中中 Tiếng Việt 中中中 United States Environmental Protection Agency Learn the Issues Science & Technology Laws & Regulations About EPA EPA Superfund Program: USARMY/NASA REDSTONE ARSENAL, HUNTSVILLE, AL Contact Us Share EPA’s Superfund Program: Making a Visible Difference Where is this site? The U.S. Army at Redstone Arsenal (RSA) is an active installation that Stay Updated Regional News encompasses 38,300 acres of land southwest of Huntsville, Alabama. Public Participation Since opening in the early 1940s, development within RSA has largely Opportunities: There are no meetings or revolved around the historical need to produce, and later dispose of, comment periods scheduled at conventional and chemical munitions. From 1942 to 1945, DA this time. operations were used to manufacture raw materials for toxic agents and incendiary materials, and to assemble, store, and ship the final Site Reports and products. Onsite waste disposal activities included the disposal of Documents construction debris, drums, and chemical munitions, and open burning No published Administrative of combustible materials. After the war, the RSA became a center for Record documents currently the receipt, storage, and demilitarization of Allied and German available. No published Special chemical agents. In 1949, RSA’s mission changed to research and Collection documents development of rocketry and guided missile systems. In 1960, civilian currently available. rocketry and missile activities were transferred to National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) The George C. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) which is located in the central portion of the Site Facts installation (1,841 acres).
    [Show full text]
  • 53Rd IAA HISTORY of ASTRONAUTICS SYMPOSIUM (E4) “Can You Believe They Put a Man on the Moon?” the Apollo Program
    70th International Astronautical Congress 2019 Paper ID: 48885 oral 53rd IAA HISTORY OF ASTRONAUTICS SYMPOSIUM (E4) \Can you believe they put a man on the moon?" The Apollo Program. (3) Author: Mr. John Goodman Odyssey Space Research, United States, [email protected] DORIS CHANDLER AND THE SATURN V GUIDANCE DEBATE Abstract Doris Chandler was a NASA engineer who led the team of men who developed the on-board guidance algorithm used by the Saturn launch vehicles. She received a B.S. in Mathematics from Tulane University with a Phi Beta Kappa Key and joined the Aeroballistics Laboratory at the Redstone Arsenal in 1953. As a NASA employee at the Marshall Space Flight Center in the 1960s, she served in three management positions: Deputy Chief of the Guidance Theory Section, Chief of the Guidance Application Section, and Chief of the Applied Guidance and Flight Mechanics Branch. In the early 1960s, Doris Chandler's team developed one of two competing mathematical concepts for Saturn guidance. The advent of flyable digital computers permitted the development of software- based guidance algorithms. Reference trajectory guidance methods employing analog computing, used for ballistic missiles in the 1950s, were not suitable for new space launch vehicles like the Saturn V. The Polynomial Guidance Mode (PGM), championed by Peenem¨undeveteran Rudolf Hoelker, used guidance polynomials derived from curve fits of nominal and dispersed optimal trajectories computed using the calculus of variations. PGM required extensive pre-flight computation but resulted in simple on-board software. Doris Chandler's team developed the Iterative Guidance Mode (IGM) based on an idea of Peenem¨unde veteran Helmut Horn that involved Lawden's linear tangent steering law.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center
    New version/vector logo/and vector type New version/bitmap logo/and outline type Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Reversed White Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Federal Energy Management Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Program (FEMP) facilitates the Federal Government’s implementation of sound, cost-effective energy management and investment practices to enhance the nation’s energy security and environmental stewardship. PIX 17618 NASA’S MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER SAVES WATER WITH HIGH-EFFICIENCY TOILET AND URINAL PROGRAM Best Management Practice Case Study #6 — Toilets and Urinals Established in 1960, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has a longstanding, successful sustainability program that focuses on energy and water efficiency as well as environmental protection. MSFC’s key operations include propulsion and transportation systems for the space shuttle and Ares rockets. MSFC also provides advanced engineering and operations for International Space Station systems. Located in Huntsville, Alabama, adjacent to Redstone Arsenal, MSFC has more than 4.5 million square feet of building space occupied by 7,000 personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • General John E. Hyten
    General John E. Hyten Gen. John E. Hyten is Commander of U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM), one of nine Unified Commands under the Department of Defense. USSTRATCOM is responsible for the global command and control of U.S. strategic forces to meet decisive national security objectives, providing a broad range of strategic capabilities and options for the President and Secretary of Defense. General Hyten attended Harvard University on an Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps scholarship, graduated in 1981 with a bachelor's degree in engineering and applied sciences and was commissioned a second lieutenant. General Hyten's career includes assignments in a variety of space acquisition and operations positions. He served in senior engineering positions on both Air Force and Army anti-satellite weapon system programs. The general's staff assignments include tours with the Air Force Secretariat, the Air Staff, the Joint Staff and the Commander's Action Group at Headquarters Air Force Space Command as Director. He served as mission director in Cheyenne Mountain and was the last active-duty commander of the 6th Space Operations Squadron at Offutt AFB, Nebraska. In 2006, he deployed to Southwest Asia as Director of Space Forces for operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. General Hyten commanded the 595th Space Group and the 50th Space Wing at Schriever AFB, Colo. Prior to assuming command of Air Force Space Command, he served as the Vice Commander, Air Force Space Command. EDUCATION 1981 Bachelor's degree in engineering and applied sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 1985 Master of Business Administration degree, Auburn University, Montgomery, Ala.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update, April 14
    As of April 12, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 2: Director of Administration and Management (DA&M), the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the DA&M, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilians between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memorandum on the conditions- based approach to personnel movement and travel dated March 15, 2021. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 147 of 230 Installations (64%) (Met: Step 1 & Step 2) Of the 147 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 0 reinstated travel restrictions while 2 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of April 12, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD Yes ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL No BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany Yes CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea Yes CAMP DODGE Army USA - IA Yes CAMP HENRY Army South Korea Yes CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea Yes CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan No CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA No DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI No FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA Yes FORT BENNING Army USA - GA No FORT BLISS Army USA - TX No FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC Yes FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO Yes FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI Yes FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD Yes FORT DRUM Army USA - NY Yes FORT GEORGE G.
    [Show full text]
  • West Gate on Schedule Photo by Steve Brady Entrance Will Re-Open in November, Relieve Load on North and East Gates
    COMMANDER’S CORNER: KEY WING EVENTS SUMMARY – PAGE 3 Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado Thursday, September 20, 2007 Vol. 51 No. 25 West Gate on schedule Photo by Steve Brady Entrance will re-open in November, relieve load on North and East gates By Corey Dahl move it over to the right lane, and then the Space Observer gate was down to one lane coming onto Sitting in traffic at the North and East base,” Mr. Williams said. “We’re not going to gates might seem frustrating now, but, in a have that problem anymore. It’s going to be couple of months, it will all be a distant so much better.” memory. The new gatehouse will feature an over- Contractors are working six days a week hanging cover to protect gate guards and putting the finishing touches on the $12.7 anyone performing augmentee duty from million West Gate renovation project, which the weather. is nearly 80 percent complete. Barring any And the new visitor’s center, which will fall snowstorms, the gate is on track to re- more than double in size, will help open Nov. 4, said Roger Williams, military streamline the process for getting guests construction inspector with the 21st Civil on base. Engineer Squadron. Until everything opens, though, Peterson “It’s definitely on schedule,” he said. employees and residents will have to con- “Unless we have really bad weather in tinue to bear with delays at the North and October, there’s no reason we won’t open East gates. on time.” Mr. Williams said CE is working on Construction continues in earnest at the West Gate; the re-opening ceremony is slated for Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update, August 25, 2021
    As of August 23, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 2: Director of Administration and Management (DA&M), the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the DA&M, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilians between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memorandum on the conditions- based approach to personnel movement and travel dated March 15, 2021. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 190 of 230 Installations (83%) (Met: Step 1 & Step 2) Of the 190 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 4 reinstated travel restrictions while 0 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of August 23, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD Yes ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL Yes BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany Yes CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea Yes CAMP DODGE Army USA - IA Yes CAMP HENRY Army South Korea Yes CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea Yes CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan Yes CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA Yes DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI Yes FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA Yes FORT BENNING Army USA - GA Yes FORT BLISS Army USA - TX Yes FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC Yes FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO Yes FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI Yes FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD Yes FORT DRUM Army USA - NY Yes FORT GEORGE G.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 an Anthology of the Distinguished Achievements in Science and Technique. Part 50: Rocket-Space Technology Designer Wernher
    Electrical Engineering. Great Events. Famous Names UDC 629.7:930.1 doi: 10.20998/2074-272X.2019.4.01 M.I. Baranov AN ANTHOLOGY OF THE DISTINGUISHED ACHIEVEMENTS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUE. PART 50: ROCKET-SPACE TECHNOLOGY DESIGNER WERNHER VON BRAUN AND HIS ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN MISSILE DESIGN Purpose. Preparation of short scientifically-historical essay about one of founders of world rocket production, distinguished German-American designer of modern space-rocket technique Wernher von Braun. Methodology. Known scientific methods of collection, analysis and analytical treatment of scientific and technical information, touching becoming and development in the world of space-rocket technique and resulted in scientific monographs, journals and internet-reports. Results. A short scientifically-historical essay is presented about the distinguished German-American designer of space-rocket technique Wernher von Braun, becoming one of founders of world rocket production. Basic scientific and technical achievements of talented and purposeful scientist Doctor of Physics Wernher von Braun in area of modern rocket production, getting over on persistent initiative of the American special services after the defeat of Germany in World War II in the USA (1945) for continuation of the work in area of missile technology (he was the main designer of the German battle ballistic rocket V-2 of midrange with a liquid rocket engine (LRE), created in 1944), carrying military-strategic character by that time. It is shown that Wernher von Braun is the founder of the space program of the USA and leader of developments of the American pilot-controlled spaceships of series «Apollo» within the framework of the Lunar program of the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Military Space Operation in Facts and Figures
    2009 Space Almanac The US military space operation in facts and figures. Compiled by Tamar A. Mehuron, Associate Editor, and the staff of Air Force Magazine This almanac was compiled by Air Force Magazine, with assistance and information from Celinda Marsh, OMB, Science and Space Branch; researcher Joseph J. Burger; researcher Jeremy Singer; and US Strate- gic Command and Air Force Space Command Public Affairs Offices. Figures that appear in this section will not always agree because of different cutoff dates, rounding, or dif- ferent methods of reporting. The information is intended to illustrate trends in space activity. 52 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2009 0.05G 60,000 miles Geosynchronous Earth orbit 22,300 miles Hard vacuum 1,000 miles Medium Earth orbit begins 300 miles 0.95G 100 miles Low Earth orbit begins 60 miles Astronaut wings awarded 50 miles Limit for ramjet engines 28 miles Limit for turbojet engines 20 miles Stratosphere begins 10 miles Artist’s conception by Erik Simonsen Illustration not to scale AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2009 53 US Military Missions in Space Space Support Space Force Enhancement Space Control Space Force Application Deploy, launch, and sustain mili- Provide satellite command and Ensure freedom of action in space Provide capabilities for the ap- tary and intelligence systems control communications, posi- for the US and its allies and, plication of combat operations in space. tioning, navigation, and timing; when directed, deny an adversary in, through, and from space to environmental monitoring; mis- freedom of action in space. influence the course and outcome sile warning; and intelligence- of conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update, July 29
    As of July 27, 2020 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet State/Country Opening Up America Gating Criteria (14 Day Declining Trend in Symptoms & Cases; No Stay At Home Order)* Step 2: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 3: CMO, the Sec of a Mil Department, or a CCDR approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 and Step 2 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the Chief Management Officer, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. * Data obtained from Center for Diseases Control, Health and Human Services, and State Health Departments Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilian between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memo on the conditions‐based, phased approach to personnel movement and travel dated May 22, 2020. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 94 of 231 Installations (41%) (Met: Step 1, Step 2, & Step 3) Of the 94 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 4 reinstated travel restrictions while 6 lifted restrictions. 1 of 7 As of July 27, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Field Artillery Rockets, Missiles, and The
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF FIELD ARTILLERY ROCKETS, MISSILES, AND THE THREAT Dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 heralded the beginning of the atomic age, often called the nuclear age. Initially, the American defense establishment made strategic atomic weapons and airpower its number one priority to deter aggression and relegated the ground forces to a distant second. The Soviet acquisition of the atomic bomb in 1949, the fall of China to the communists in 1949, and the Korean War of the early 1950s, however, energized the Army to develop tactical atomic field artillery rockets and guided missiles to augment a conventional atomic cannon and to complement strategic atomic weapons. After the Korean War and through the 1980s, the Soviet-Warsaw Pact threat motivated the Army and the Field Artillery to continue modernizing and expanding their tactical nuclear weapons arsenal. With the collapse of the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact in the 1990s, the need for tactical nuclear weapons disappeared. This emboldened the President of the United States, George H.W. Bush, to eliminate country’s tactical nuclear weapons and forced Army and the Field Artillery to rely upon long-range conventional rockets and missiles to counter international threats to national security. FIRST GENERATION OF NUCLEAR ROCKETS AND MISSILES Following World War Two, the American military community concluded that an air-delivered atomic bomb (a fission bomb in which the atom nucleus was split to generate energy) represented the ultimate weapon. President Harry Truman and the American defense community relied upon the threat of the atomic bomb as the nation’s first line of defense to deter and even halt an invasion of West Europe by the numerically superior Soviet army.
    [Show full text]