Adobe PDF File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adobe PDF File BOOK REVIEWS Frank Broeze (ed.). Maritime History at the more importantly for the future of maritime Crossroads: A Critical Review of Recent Histori• history (and its funding), this literature has made ography. "Research in Maritime History," No. 9; little impact on main stream historiography. Not St. John's, NF: International Maritime Economic only in The Netherlands or in Denmark but History Association, 1995. xxi + 294 pp. US $15 virtually everywhere (with the possible exception (free to members of the IMEHA), paper; ISBN 0- of Great Britain), maritime history is on the 9695885-8-5. periphery of historical scholarship. Of all the national historiographies surveyed This collection of thirteen essays sets out to pro• in this volume, perhaps Canada's has had the most vide a review of the recent literature in maritime spectacular growth in the last twenty years. Most history. The inspiration for the compendium grew of this work has been as a result of the research out of the "New Directions in Maritime History" done by the Atlantic Canada Shipping Project at conference held at Fremantle, Western Australia Memorial University in St. John's. Canadian in 1993. Included in the collection are historio• maritime history scarcely existed before the graphies for eleven countries (or portions there• advent of the project. But while the nineteenth- of): Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, Ger• century shipping of Atlantic Canada has been many, Greece, India, The Netherlands, the Otto• analyzed, much remains to be done. Work has man Empire, Spain, and the United States. One only begun on twentieth century topics (naval essay deals with South America, another concerns history excepted). Coastal shipping has yet to maritime labour. The editor is to be commended attract much serious scholarship. Even the mari• for including papers on a diversity of maritime time side of that hardy perennial of Canadian nations. The seemingly serious national omis• historiography, the fur trade, has yet to get much sions, such as Great Britain, France, and Norway attention. Fischer provides a useful commentary are the result of lack of space or the recent publi• on these developments, though for Canadian cation of historiographical surveys elsewhere. Great Lakes studies, readers should also consult The editor opens with an introduction that the back numbers of Ontario History. stresses the internationalism of the new maritime Greece has also had a recent flowering of history, though he also concedes that much of this maritime historiography, although as Harlaftis ideology is mere rhetoric. Only two of the papers, readily points out, much still has to be done. Ortiz-Sotelo's work on Ibero-American maritime Greek maritime historians face various problems history and Trainor's essay on labour historiogra• such as funding difficulties and secretive vessel phy, deal with more than one country. Instead the owners but there appears to be a profitable future last twenty years of historical publications have for Greek maritime studies. In contrast, American produced many parallel developments along maritime (or "Oceanic," to use Flayhart's termi• national lines. This collection itself is an excellent nology) history is older and better developed. example of the comparative scarcity of truly Yet, paradoxically, in the last decade it does not international study. seem to have been as dynamic as the new Greek The nations with the most fully developed or Canadian studies. Readers should note that maritime historiographies reviewed here appear to Flayhart does not discuss research on the Ameri• be The Netherlands and Denmark with Canada an can side of the Great Lakes nor does he deal with inconsistent third. Both Bruijn's and Holm's the periodical literature. essays analyze an abundance of scholarship that The editors of the "Research in Maritime is the envy of maritime historians in other coun• History" series should consider issuing updates of tries. But as they readily admit, this writing has Maritime History at the Crossroads at regular two major limitations. Most of it is written from intervals. Perhaps the next instalment could a national (or local) perspective. And perhaps include papers on fields such as business history, 55 56 The Northern Mariner the shipbuilding, and maritime law as well as headed notepaper? When the bulk of the Anchor more traditional national studies of Great Britain, Line records are elsewhere (Glasgow University) Japan, France, and Norway. might it not have been useful to include this information, as has been done with the Cunard M. Stephen Salmon archive at Liverpool University? Ottawa, Ontario If the ephemeral has sometimes been exalted, there is much of substance elsewhere in the guide. Gordon Read and Michael Stammers (comp.). With few exceptions, the museum has secured the Guide to the Records of the Merseyside Maritime records of Liverpool shipowners, along with Museum. Research in Maritime History No. 8; St. those of the port authority. If the guide seems in John's: International Maritime Economic History any way incomplete, it is because a second vol• Association and the Trustees of the National ume is in preparation to deal with the smaller and Museums and Galleries on Merseyside, 1995. xiii more diverse collections. Some failings are + 153 pp. US $15 (free to members of IMEHA), candidly acknowledged, such as the description paper; ISBN 0-9695885-7-7. of the John Holt & Co. collections (three hundred boxes), which the compilers would happily have One of the greatest services an archive repository expanded. But archival collections do not stand can provide is to publish an overall guide to its still and any guide must face the fact that it can holdings. Too much information is locked in the only reflect a stage of development. Together heads of curatorial staff or held only on finding Read and Stammers have an exceptional knowl• aids in the repositories themselves. What is true edge of the maritime history and archives of of archives in general is particularly pertinent Merseyside; we now have reason to be grateful where maritime sources are concerned. The com• that they shared it with us. plexity and diversity of the records require re• searchers to inform themselves to an unusual deg• L.A. Ritchie ree and in this they are too rarely assisted by pub• London, England lished guides and surveys. The compilers com• ment on the pioneering work of Peter Mathias and R.B. Prud'homme van Reine (intro. & ed.); Allan Pearsall, Shipping: A Survey of Historical G.M.W. Acda, L.M. Akveld, R. Daalder, P.C. van Records (1971), and it is a pity that it has taken so Royen (eds.). Schepen bij de vleet: maritieme long for a work to appear which in any way musea in Nederland en België. Amsterdam: De supplements or supersedes it. The appearance of Bataafsche Leeuw, 1996. 234 pp., photographs this guide is therefore especially welcome. and illustrations (b+w, colour). / 46, -/920 Bfr, The guide is arranged in four chapters. The cloth; ISBN 90-6707-390-3. first describes records deposited or presented under the Public Records Act 1958, principally The concept of this amazingly successful book is the Liverpool Register of Merchant Ships. Chap• quite simple. It is a guide to all thirty-three Dutch ter 2 deals with records of official organizations, and three Belgian maritime museums, including but it is effectively a description of the records of both national museums, like the Amsterdam Mersey Docks and Harbour Board. Chapter 3 Rijksmuseum, and local general ones having an deals with the records of trade and employers' important maritime collection. Each museum is organizations including marine insurance associa• described in a couple of pages, written by the tions. Chapter 4, which accounts for nearly half resident expert. This leads necessarily to some the guide, is devoted to shipowners' records. It is unevenness in the treatment of the various muse• this last chapter, with its brief histories and bib• ums, but given the differences between the muse• liographical references, which is of particular ums and their holdings, a certain degree of un• interest. It must be said, however, that sometimes evenness seems inevitable anyway. Most des• the slightness of the records seems at odds with criptions provide coverage of local or regional its authoritative context. Does the Anchor Line maritime history as well as the history of the merit an entry, one might ask, on the basis of a museum and its current holdings. It is clear that ship's newspaper, a poster and two sheets of much care has been given to the illustrations, Book Reviews 57 which show museum buildings, exhibits, museum decades. For the last nineteen years of that career ships and images of local maritime activities. he co-hosted the public-affairs programme As It Lists of other museums with maritime objects and Happens, where, in the guise of Fireside Al and of museum ships complete the book. Front Porch Al, he entertained listeners with The surprising effect of the book as a whole readings from the pages of world literature. Since is that it offers much more than just a guide to his retirement, Maitland, who now lives in Nova museums. Dutch maritime history in particular is Scotia, has been producing well-received antholo• described from the diversity of the museum gies apparently compiled from the large body of holdings, which focus one moment on building material that he assembled for his radio readings. ships, then on fishing or sailing, one moment on For his latest book, Maitland adopts a new the national level, then on the regional or local persona, Seaside Al, and turns his attention to the level, and which inter alia include a number of literature of the sea. It is obvious, however, that specialized museums that focus on a diversity of he has chosen not to produce yet another tradi• subjects — navies, rescue, towage, beachcombers, tional genre collection comprising recycled tales inland shipping and dredging.
Recommended publications
  • Fuel Forecourt Retail Market
    Fuel Forecourt Retail Market Grow non-fuel Are you set to be the mobility offerings — both products and Capitalise on the value-added mobility mega services trends (EVs, AVs and MaaS)1 retailer of tomorrow? Continue to focus on fossil Innovative Our report on Fuel Forecourt Retail Market focusses In light of this, w e have imagined how forecourts w ill fuel in short run, concepts and on the future of forecourt retailing. In the follow ing look like in the future. We believe that the in-city but start to pivot strategic Continuously pages w e delve into how the trends today are petrol stations w hich have a location advantage, w ill tow ards partnerships contemporary evolve shaping forecourt retailing now and tomorrow . We become suited for convenience retailing; urban fuel business start by looking at the current state of the Global forecourts w ould become prominent transport Relentless focus on models Forecourt Retail Market, both in terms of geographic exchanges; and highw ay sites w ill cater to long customer size and the top players dominating this space. distance travellers. How ever the level and speed of Explore Enhance experience Innovation new such transformation w ill vary by economy, as operational Next, w e explore the trends that are re-shaping the for income evolutionary trends in fuel retailing observed in industry; these are centred around the increase in efficiency tomorrow streams developed markets are yet to fully shape-up in importance of the Retail proposition, Adjacent developing ones. Services and Mobility. As you go along, you w ill find examples of how leading organisations are investing Further, as the pace of disruption accelerates, fuel their time and resources, in technology and and forecourt retailers need to reimagine innovative concepts to become more future-ready.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • US Fleet Organization, 1939
    US Fleet Organization 1939 Battle Force US Fleet: USS California (BB-44)(Force Flagship) Battleships, Battle Force (San Pedro) USS West Virginia (BB-48)(flagship) Battleship Division 1: USS Arizona (BB-39)(flag) USS Nevada (BB-36) USS Pennsylvania (BB-38)(Fl. Flag) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 1-9 VOS Battleship Division 2: USS Tennessee (BB-43)(flag) USS Oklahoma (BB-37) USS California (BB-44)(Force flagship) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 2-9 VOS Battleship Division 3: USS Idaho (BB-42)(flag) USS Mississippi (BB-41) USS New Mexico (BB-40) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 3-9 VOS Battleship Division 4: USS West Virginia (BB-48)(flag) USS Colorado (BB-45) USS Maryland (BB-46) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 4-9 VOS Cruisers, Battle Force: (San Diego) USS Honolulu (CL-48)(flagship) Cruiser Division 2: USS Trenton (CL-11)(flag) USS Memphis (CL-13) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 2-4 VSO Cruiser Division 3: USS Detroit (CL-8)(flag) USS Cincinnati (CL-6) USS Milwaukee (CL-5) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 3-6 VSO Cruise Division 8: USS Philadelphia (CL-41)(flag) USS Brooklyn (CL-40) USS Savannah (CL-42) USS Nashville (CL-43) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 8-16 VSO Cruiser Division 9: USS Honolulu (CL-48)(flag) USS Phoneix (CL-46) USS Boise (CL-47) USS St. Louis (CL-49)(when commissioned Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 8-16 VSO 1 Destroyers, Battle Force (San Diego) USS Concord (CL-10) Ship Air Unit 2 VSO Destroyer Flotilla 1: USS Raleigh (CL-7)(flag) Ship Air Unit 2 VSO USS Dobbin (AD-3)(destroyer tender) (served 1st & 3rd Squadrons) USS Whitney (AD-4)(destroyer tender)
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Rose Trust 2013 Annual Report
    Annual Review 2013 Learning Conservation Heritage Mary Rose Annual Review 2013_v11.indd 1 20/06/2013 15:49 2 www.maryrose.org Annual Review 2013 Mary Rose Annual Review 2013_v11.indd 2 20/06/2013 15:49 Annual Review 2013 www.maryrose.org 3 Mary Rose Annual Review 2013_v11.indd 3 20/06/2013 15:49 4 www.maryrose.org Annual Review 2013 Mary Rose Annual Review 2013_v11.indd 4 20/06/2013 15:50 Chairman & Chief Executive Foreword This last year has been momentous for the Mary Rose Trust, In tandem with this, much research is opening up to the Trust and the achievements have been of national and international and is now higher in our priorities. The human remains, importance. The Mary Rose Project has been an exemplar now boldly explained more fully in our exhibition, can be of both excavation and conservation over its thirty plus year studied scientifically for the secrets they can reveal. Medical history, but experts from afar now declare the new museum research is included within our ambitions and we will be to be the exemplar of exhibition for future generations. New working with leading universities in this area. Similarly, standards have been set, and the success of our ambition has our Head of Collections is already involved in pioneering been confirmed by the early comments being received. work in new forms of conservation techniques, which could revolutionise the affordability and timescales of future Elsewhere in this review you will read more about the projects. These are just two examples of a number of areas challenges that were met in reaching this point.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgery at Sea: an Analysis of Shipboard Medical Practitioners and Their Instrumentation
    Surgery at Sea: An Analysis of Shipboard Medical Practitioners and Their Instrumentation By Robin P. Croskery Howard April, 2016 Director of Thesis: Dr. Lynn Harris Major Department: Maritime Studies, History Abstract: Shipboard life has long been of interest to maritime history and archaeology researchers. Historical research into maritime medical practices, however, rarely uses archaeological data to support its claims. The primary objective of this thesis is to incorporate data sets from the medical assemblages of two shipwreck sites and one museum along with historical data into a comparative analysis. Using the methods of material culture theory and pattern recognition, this thesis will explore changes in western maritime medical practices as compared to land-based practices over time. Surgery at Sea: An Analysis of Shipboard Medical Practitioners and Their Instrumentation FIGURE I. Cautery of a wound or ulcer. (Gersdorff 1517.) A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History Program in Maritime Studies East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Maritime Studies By Robin P. Croskery Howard 2016 © Copyright 2016 Robin P. Croskery Howard Surgery at Sea: An Analysis of Shipboard Medical Practitioners and Their Instrumentation Approved by: COMMITTEE CHAIR ___________________________________ Lynn Harris (Ph.D.) COMMITTEE MEMBER ____________________________________ Angela Thompson (Ph.D.) COMMITTEE MEMBER ____________________________________ Jason Raupp (Ph.D.) COMMITTEE MEMBER ____________________________________ Linda Carnes-McNaughton (Ph.D.) DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY CHAIR ____________________________________ Christopher Oakley (Ph.D.) GRADUATE SCHOOL DEAN ____________________________________ Paul J. Gemperline (Ph.D.) Special Thanks I would like to thank my husband, Bernard, and my family for their love, support, and patience during this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Medieval Seafaring Anthropology 629
    Spring, 2013 Post-Medieval Seafaring Anthropology 629 Instructor: Dr. Kevin Crisman The Office in Exile: 138 Read Building (Kyle Field Basement), ☎ 979-845-6696 Office hours: Tuesday and Thursday, 1-4 or by appointment This course examines archaeological and historical sources to chronicle and explore the development of shipbuilding, seafaring practices, world exploration, waterborne trade and economic systems, and naval warfare in Europe and around the world (except the Americas) from the fifteenth century to the beginning of the twentieth century. Archaeological studies of shipwrecks, ships’ equipment, and cargoes provide a focal point for investigating change and continuity in the maritime sphere over five centuries. Prerequisites: Anth 615 and 616 or instructor approval. Course Schedule: Week 1. Introduction to Course. (Jan. 15) 1. Review of course goals and discussion of seminar presentations. 2. Discussion of term paper research, writing, and editing. 3. Europe at the End of the Medieval Era [Crisman]. Week 2. Transitions in the Technology of Ships and Weaponry. (Jan. 22) Seminar topics: 1. A peek at 15th-Century Shipping: the Aveiro A Wreck and the Newport Ship. 2. The Villefranche Wreck. 3. A 16th-Century Trio: Cattewater, Studland Bay, and ‘Kravel’ Wrecks. 4. Gunpowder Weapons in Late Medieval Europe [Crisman]. 2 Week 3. The Naval Revolution Incarnate: Henry VIII’s Mary Rose. (Jan. 29) Seminar topics: 1. Mary Rose: History and Construction Features. 2. Early 16th Century Ship Rigs and the Rigging of Mary Rose. 3. The Cannon and Small Arms of Mary Rose. 4. Shipboard Organization and Life on Mary Rose as Revealed by the Artifacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting to Innovation: the Us Navy, High-Steam Destroyers, and the Second World War
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: ADAPTING TO INNOVATION: THE US NAVY, HIGH-STEAM DESTROYERS, AND THE SECOND WORLD WAR. Tyler A. Pitrof, Master of Arts, 2013 Directed By: Associate Professor Jon T. Sumida, Department of History The US Navy’s move to high-pressure and -temperature steam propulsion, otherwise known as “high steam,” has been viewed in the postwar period as a critical advance that made long-range operations possible during World War II. This position, which is almost entirely reliant on the autobiography of Rear Admiral Harold G. Bowen, has neglected to consider the complex and problematic nature of the supply chain required to produce high-steam turbines. Archival research has revealed that the US Navy’s insensitivity to these changes after 1938 caused severe bottlenecks in wartime destroyer production. Also overlooked was the aggressive administrative action on the part of the Navy’s Bureau of Ships and its turbine subcontractors required to mitigate this crisis. Together, these events formed an important example of the need to adapt administratively to match the advance of technology. ADAPTING TO INNOVATION: THE US NAVY, HIGH-STEAM DESTROYERS, AND THE SECOND WORLD WAR. By Tyler A. Pitrof Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Military History 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T. Sumida, Chair Professor Arthur Eckstein Professor Robert Friedel © Copyright by Tyler A. Pitrof 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .............................................................................................................. iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Slipping Through The
    Contents Acknowledgements 2 Executive Summary 3 Section 1: Introduction 4 1.1 Statement of IFA MAG Position 4 1.1.1 Archaeological Archives 4 1.1.2 Maritime Archaeological Archives 5 1.2 Structure of Strategy Document 6 1.3 Case Study: An Illustration of the Current Situation 7 Section 2: The Current System 9 2.1 The Current System in Policy: Roles and Responsibilities 9 2.1.1 Who’s Who? 9 2.1.2 Roles and Responsibilities 11 2.1.3 Legislative Responsibilities 12 2.2 The Current System in Practice 13 2.2.1 The Varied Fate of Protected Wreck Site Archives 13 2.2.2.The Unprotected Majority of Britain’s Historic Wreck Sites 15 2.3 A question of resources, remit or regulation? 16 Section 3: Archival Best Practice and Maritime Issues 17 3.1 Established Archival Policy and Best Practice 17 3.2 Application to Maritime Archives 18 3.2.1 Creation—Management and Standards 18 3.2.2 Preparation—Conservation, Selection and Retention 19 3.2.3 Transfer—Ownership and Receiving Museums 20 3.2.4 Curation—Access, Security and Public Ownership 21 3.3 Communication and Dialogue 22 3.4 Policy and Guidance Voids 23 Section 4: Summary of Issues 24 4.1.1 Priority Issues 24 4.1.2 Short Term Issues 24 4.1.3 Long Term Issues 24 4.2 Conclusions 25 Section 5: References 26 Section 6: Stakeholder and Other Relevant Organisations 27 Section 7: Policy Statements 30 IFA Strategy Document: Maritime Archaeological Archives 1 Acknowledgements This document has been written by Jesse Ransley and edited by Julie Satchell on behalf of the Institute of Field Archaeologists Maritime Affairs Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Americanlegionvo1356amer.Pdf (9.111Mb)
    Executive Dres WINTER SLACKS -|Q95* i JK_ J-^ pair GOOD LOOKING ... and WARM ! Shovel your driveway on a bitter cold morning, then drive straight to the office! Haband's impeccably tailored dress slacks do it all thanks to these great features: • The same permanent press gabardine polyester as our regular Dress Slacks. • 1 00% preshrunk cotton flannel lining throughout. Stitched in to stay put! • Two button-thru security back pockets! • Razor sharp crease and hemmed bottoms! • Extra comfortable gentlemen's full cut! • 1 00% home machine wash & dry easy care! Feel TOASTY WARM and COMFORTABLE! A quality Haband import Order today! Flannel 1 i 95* 1( 2 for 39.50 3 for .59.00 I 194 for 78. .50 I Haband 100 Fairview Ave. Prospect Park, NJ 07530 Send REGULAR WAISTS 30 32 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 pairs •BIG MEN'S ADD $2.50 per pair for 46 48 50 52 54 INSEAMS S( 27-28 M( 29-30) L( 31-32) XL( 33-34) of pants ) I enclose WHAT WHAT HOW 7A9.0FL SIZE? INSEAM7 MANY? c GREY purchase price D BLACK plus $2.95 E BROWN postage and J SLATE handling. Check Enclosed a VISA CARD# Name Mail Address Apt. #_ City State .Zip_ 00% Satisfaction Guaranteed or Full Refund of Purchase $ § 3 Price at Any Time! The Magazine for a Strong America Vol. 135, No. 6 December 1993 ARTICLE s VA CAN'T SURVIVE BY STANDING STILL National Commander Thiesen tells Congress that VA will have to compete under the President's health-care plan.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2003
    December 2003 THE JERSEYMAN To our United States Armed Forces From the volunteers of USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) Happy Holidays, Happy New Year, and Thank You for your service God Bless America 2 THE JERSEYMAN DECEMBER 2003 HISTORY OF U.S.S. NEW JERSEY ... “TYPHOON COBRA,” DECEMBER 18, 1944 - Thousands of US sailors serving aboard the 130 plus ships of Task Force 38, rode out a terrible storm on December 18, 1944, and it is sadly remembered today as “Typhoon Cobra.” This storm resulted in 3 capsized destroyers, the loss of 790 men, the total destruction of 146 badly needed combat aircraft, and brought crippling dam- age to many ships. Especially hard hit were the CVL’s (Light Aircraft Carriers,) and CVE’s (Escort Carriers.) At the time, USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) was serving as fleet flagship for Task Force 38, and was under the command of Admiral William “Bull” Halsey. Today, as The Jerseyman commemorates this tragic World War 2 event, we are privileged to include stories of the storm as it was experienced by many of the sailors who were there. During our typhoon research, we were also fortunate to have had contact with Mr. Richard A. Strand, brother of lost USS SPENCE crewman Robert L. Strand. Mr. Strand has compiled an extensive amount of material about his brother’s ship. He graciously shared this information with The Jerseyman, and for many years, has offered his efforts at no cost, to the families of USS SPENCE crewmen. Along with the USS SPENCE’s history, his research contains many operating charts for the ship, and an excerpt from the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), that USS SPENCE had received as part of Arleigh Burke’s famous “Little Beaver” Destroyer Squadron (DesRon) 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the USNA Class of 1963 Who Served in the Vietnam War
    Members of the USNA Class of 1963 Who Served in the Vietnam War. Compiled by Stephen Coester '63 Supplement to the List of Over Three Hundred Classmates Who Served in Vietnam 1 Phil Adams I was on the USS Boston, Guided Missile Cruiser patrolling the Vietnam Coast in '67, and we got hit above the water line in the bow by a sidewinder missile by our own Air Force. ------------------- Ross Anderson [From Ross’s Deceased Data, USNA63.org]: Upon graduation from the Academy on 5 June 1963, Ross reported for flight training at Pensacola Naval Air Station (NAS) which he completed at the top of his flight class (and often "Student of the Month") in 1964. He then left for his first Southeast Asia Cruise to begin conducting combat missions in Vietnam. Landing on his newly assigned carrier USS Coral Sea (CVA-43) at midnight, by 5 am that morning he was off on his first combat mission. That squadron, VF-154 (the Black Knights) had already lost half of its cadre of pilots. Ross' flying buddy Don Camp describes how Ross would seek out flying opportunities: Upon our return on Oct 31, 1965 to NAS Miramar, the squadron transitioned from the F-8D (Crusader) to the F4B (Phantom II). We left on a second combat cruise and returned about Jan 1967. In March or April of 1967, Ross got himself assigned TAD [temporary additional duty] to NAS North Island as a maintenance test pilot. I found out and jumped on that deal. We flew most all versions of the F8 and the F4 as they came out of overhaul.
    [Show full text]
  • White Star Liners White Star Liners
    White Star Liners White Star Liners This document, and more, is available for download from Martin's Marine Engineering Page - www.dieselduck.net White Star Liners Adriatic I (1872-99) Statistics Gross Tonnage - 3,888 tons Dimensions - 133.25 x 12.46m (437.2 x 40.9ft) Number of funnels - 1 Number of masts - 4 Construction - Iron Propulsion - Single screw Engines - Four-cylindered compound engines made by Maudslay, Sons & Field, London Service speed - 14 knots Builder - Harland & Wolff Launch date - 17 October 1871 Passenger accommodation - 166 1st class, 1,000 3rd class Details of Career The Adriatic was ordered by White Star in 1871 along with the Celtic, which was almost identical. It was launched on 17 October 1871. It made its maiden voyage on 11 April 1872 from Liverpool to New York, via Queenstown. In May of the same year it made a record westbound crossing, between Queenstown and Sandy Hook, which had been held by Cunard's Scotia since 1866. In October 1874 the Adriatic collided with Cunard's Parthia. Both ships were leaving New York harbour and steaming parallel when they were drawn together. The damage to both ships, however, was superficial. The following year, in March 1875, it rammed and sank the US schooner Columbus off New York during heavy fog. In December it hit and sank a sailing schooner in St. George's Channel. The ship was later identified as the Harvest Queen, as it was the only ship unaccounted for. The misfortune of the Adriatic continued when, on 19 July 1878, it hit the brigantine G.A.
    [Show full text]