DOCSLIB.ORG

SNCF EN 1606.Indd 1 O U V F I N S N C F E N 1 6 0 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINANCIAL REPORT 2005 2005 FINANCIAL REPORT G R O U P E G R O U P E CCouv_FIN_SNCF_EN_1606.inddouv_FIN_SNCF_EN_1606.indd 1 116/06/066/06/06 112:45:502:45:50 SNCF Direction de la Communication Direction de la Comptabilité et du Contrôle de gestion 34, rue du Commandant Mouchotte 75699 Paris Cedex 14 www.sncf.com Photo credit: SNCF /CAV Dominique Larosière Design and production: Printing: Sérag Imprimerie Document printed on ECF paper (Elementary Chloring Free) June 2006 The 2005 Financial Report is published in French and in English. It is also available on the site www.sncf.com. 22_3_3 CCouv_FIN_SNCF_1506_EN.inddouv_FIN_SNCF_1506_EN.indd 1 115/06/065/06/06 115:16:055:16:05 1 GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT All amounts are in millions of euros (€ millions), unless stated otherwise. 1- SNCF GROUP STRUCTURE 2 2- SIGNIFICANT EVENTS OF THE YEAR 4 2.1 Environment 4 2.2 Group Strategy 5 2.3 Highlights 6 3- SNCF GROUP 8 3.1 Consolidated Net Income 8 3.2 Cash Position and Finance Sources 11 3.3 Changes in Accounting Method 12 3.4 Balance Sheet 14 3.5 Financial Relations with the French State, Réseau Ferré de France and Local Authorities 15 3.6 Human Resources 17 4- ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS BY DIVISION 19 4.1 Long-distance Passengers, France & Europe Division 19 4.2 Public Transport Division 21 4.3 Freight Division 23 4.4 Infrastructure Division 26 4.5 Common Operations and Investments Division 27 5- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 28 EEXE_SNCF_GESTION_06_FP_EN.inddXE_SNCF_GESTION_06_FP_EN.indd SSec1:1ec1:1 224/05/064/05/06 110:28:320:28:32 2 SNCF Group — Management Report 2005 1. SNCF GROUP STRUCTURE Corporate structure LONG-DISTANCE PUBLIC FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE COMMON PASSENGERS, FRANCE TRANSPORT DIVISION DIVISION OPERATIONS & EUROPE DIVISION DIVISION AND INVESTMENTS DIVISION MAIN LINES - STATIONS TRANSILIEN SNCF FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE TRANSVERSAL MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS TGV CORAIL INTERCITY TRANSPORT AND AND MANAGEMENT, LOGISTICS OPERATORS PROJECT MANAGEMENT, EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING CORAIL TER TRACTION Combined INTERNATIONAL Alsace activity Naviland Cargo SNCF International HOUSING LONG-DISTANCE Aquitaine activity Novatrans Systra Group SICF TRANSPORT Auvergne activity Rouch AREP SFCI Froidcombi Eurostar Basse-Normandie activity ORFEA Écorail Thalys Bourgogne activity Rail motorway Artesia Bretagne activity REAL ESTATE CME Rhealys Centre activity SNEF Group Distribution Lyria Champagne-Ardenne activity SCI Ney Districhrono Elipsos Franche-Comté activity SCI du Cercle Haute-Normandie activity Grain SNC Monceau Languedoc-Roussillon activity Logistra SNC Vézelay CTC TRANSPORT-RELATED Limousin activity Nuclear chemicals and SERVICES Lorraine activity FINANCING Midi-Pyrénées activity indivisible loads GIE fi nancière SCETA Services Nord-Pas-de-Calais activity STSI Eurofi ma A2C Pays-de-la-Loire activity Automobile SPFRD Distribution Picardie activity STVA and new services Poitou-Charentes activity Geodis Group OTHERS Rail Europe Ltd Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur France Seafrance Voyages-sncf.com activity Europe (excl. France) SCETA Services Rail Europe INC Rhône-Alpes activity Rest of the world Ceretif VFE commerce Chemins de fer de la Corse Port facilities Shem VSC Technologie Sealogis L’Agence Voyages-sncf.com International ®iDTGV Keolis Group Fret International Freight cars Effi a Group France Wagons Ermewa SGW Final-stage carriage and logistics VFLI Garmatex FINANCING AND OTHER SERVICES Segi Sefergie Stesimaf Edifret EEXE_SNCF_GESTION_06_FP_EN.inddXE_SNCF_GESTION_06_FP_EN.indd SSec1:2ec1:2 224/05/064/05/06 110:28:340:28:34 SNCF GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT 3 Legal structure 723 entities SNCF Eurofi ma SICF SNCFP Voyageurs France SFCI Naviland Geodis Europe Eurostar SEMAPA Calberson Cargo 259 entities Partenaires Group FRP SHEM 4 entities 4 entities Novatrans Bourgey Transmanche Montreuil Night Travel Fret SOCRIF Rouch Ltd intermodal International Geodis 9 entities French GIE Logistics Railways Ltd Intercapital Eurail Test Froidcombi Regional Rail Züst Ltd Seafrance Ambrosetti French Rail Sefergie Inc. ORFEA Vitesse Districhrono Rail Europe Groupe Ltd GIE Sealogis United Garmatex 4 entities Financière 11 entities Distribution G. Rail Europe Sceta Group Inc. Ecorail Rail Europe Espagne SRL SNEF STSI EFA Rail Europe SCI Ney Logistra Benelux EFT Rail Europe Suisse Sceta Edifret VFLI Rail Europe SCI Services 15 entities Italia La Chapelle Rail Europe Stesimaf Deutschland SCI Financière Lyria EF2R du Cercle CWS Ermewa Thalys SCI Groupe International Vézelay Cie Modalhor Express Ermewa Holding Genève VFE SNC Commerce 8 entities L’Agence Monceau LONG-DISTANCE PASSENGERS, FRANCE & EUROPE DIVISION France Voyages- GEIE Wagons Ermewa sncf.com CERETIF Sysrail/Data France CTC 22 entities Voyages- SPFRD ® iDTGV sncf.com SGW STVA 37 entities CRM VSC AREP SEGI Services Technologies SNCF A2C SARI Parvis International Rhealys SA Trans- SAM Financière informatique Systra KEOLIS RE 4A 210 entities Groupe Elipsos Systra EFFIA 46 entities 11 entities Artesia PUBLIC TRANSPORT DIVISION FREIGHT DIVISION FREIGHT COMMON OPERATIONS AND INVESTMENTS DIVISION DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE Full consoIidation Proportionate consolidation Equity accounted Non consolidated EEXE_SNCF_GESTION_06_FP_EN.inddXE_SNCF_GESTION_06_FP_EN.indd SSec1:3ec1:3 224/05/064/05/06 110:28:350:28:35 4 SNCF Group — Management Report 2005 2. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS OF THE YEAR 2.1 Environment household consumption generated favourable impacts to the development of passenger traffi c essentially for home- work commuting. However, the increase in the price of oil A Mixed Macro-economic Environment products reduced the revenue available to the French for leisure travel. The macro-economic environment for fi scal year 2005 In addition, weak industrial production has hindered can be described as mixed. While the extent of the third industrial freight traffi c development, particularly for SNCF quarter upturn in the French economy was surprising, INSEE Freight, while the rise in oil prices has strained road and statistics repor ted grow th of only 1.6% for French economic rail operating costs for freight and generated price increase activity in 2005. impacts for the electricity market, increasing energy costs The situation was particularly marked by: for rail carriers. • A recognised oil shock whose impact remains muted; Finally, low interest rates limit the fi nancial income SNCF • Contrasting changes in internal Euro zone demand; driven could have drawn from the rapid improvement of its cash posi- by an oil price increase, Euro zone infl ation rose from 2.1% tion. In terms of structural costs, the low infl ation rate restricts in June 2005 to 2.5% in October, although experts are the margin for manoeuvre with respect to the price of ser vices banking on a slowdown in the trend; offered by the various Group companies, even though certain • Poor growth in the French manufacturing sector (–0.2% companies are faced with average wage increases that are in the third quarter following +0.3% in the second quarter structurally higher than the infl ation rate, thereby creating an and –0.3% in the fi rst quarter), even though the business unfavourable environment for job growth. climate indicator has been up since the spring of 2005; • A recovery in salaried jobs complemented by an accelera- tion of the subsidised employment programme; A Changing Rail Sector • A decline in household spending in the second quarter (–0.1%), and a sharp rebound in the third quarter (+0.7%), SNCF will have to confront major structural changes following a leap in consumption during the 2004-2005 at the Community and national level, which will intensify winter. Overall, average annual growth in consumption competition in the short term for international freight traffi c stood at 2%, corresponding to a virtually stable savings and for all national and international freight and passenger rate. According to INSEE, the surge in household spending traffi c in the longer term. essentially acted as a stimulus to consumer business and Accordingly, law 2006-10 relating to transport safety services; and development, which transposes into domestic law • Historically low interest rates with a very low slope and certain European Community commitments undertaken by an increase of 25 basis points in ECB offi cial rates on France, introduced four major changes: 1 December 2005 after two and a half years of status quo. • It creates, pursuant to EC Directive 2004-49 on Euro- The impacts on the SNCF Group are remarkably diffi - pean Community Railway Safety, a French Railway Safety cult to analyse. With respect to the main positive impacts, Agency, to act as domestic safety authority in this area. The the increase in petrol costs and the relative fi rmness in agency will grant safety certifi cates and monitor compliance EEXE_SNCF_GESTION_06_FP_EN.inddXE_SNCF_GESTION_06_FP_EN.indd SSec1:4ec1:4 224/05/064/05/06 110:28:350:28:35 SIGNIFICANT EVENTS OF THE YEAR 5 with safety and interoperability rules. It will be fi nanced by tiveness and solidarity, the two factors indispensable to the the infrastructure fees paid to RFF by the rail carriers; Company’s endeavour. • It transposes EC Directive 2004-51 (“second railway The 2006-2008 corporate plan will concentrate on three package”) by opening up the rail freight market to competi- focal points: tion, keeping in mind that the opening up to competition of • A strategy calling for substantial development in France the domestic freight market as of 31 March 2006 was one and Europe: sound fi nancing for investment growth, deve- of the European Commission’s requirements
Recommended publications
  • Countdown to Launch of France's First Urban Cable

    Countdown to Launch of France's First Urban Cable

    International Edition – 14 November 2016 Countdown to launch of France’s first urban cable car On Saturday 19 November, Keolis will launch France’s first urban cable car in the city of Brest in north-west Brittany. The system features the vertical crossing of cabins – a world first – and will link the left bank station, situated on a hill above the naval base, to the right bank station located inside the Ateliers des Capucins. The new Capucins eco-district, structured around former French Navy workshops, will house shops and restaurants as well as cultural and leisure facilities. The cable car is operated automatically and the system is supervised by Keolis Brest teams at the Bibus network control room. The two, 60-passenger cabins provide breath-taking views of the harbour during the three- minute crossing over the river Penfeld. This new, economical and environmentally-friendly urban transport mode will be integrated into the city’s existing public transport network, and passengers can access the tram, bus and cable car with a single Bibus transport ticket. Contact: [email protected] Operational Excellence AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND Germany: Quality Week 24-28 October as well as the addition of CCTV and a roof. Over 60 cycle surgeries have been held at stations across G:link trackside at the network: a total of 1,332 bikes were security marked and 397 high security bike locks were GC600 Super Car Championship given to passengers, contributing to a 19% reduction in cycle crime network-wide. UNITED KINGDOM Contact: [email protected] Safety Safety Following Punctuality Week in March this year, Keolis Deutschland recently organised a second CORPORATE KeoLife initiative: Quality Week.
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan

    Infrastructure Delivery Plan

    Tunbridge Wells Borough Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan March 2021 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background and Policy Context ..................................................................................... 2 National Policy ...................................................................................................................... 2 Local Policy .......................................................................................................................... 3 Local Plan policy context and strategy for growth ................................................................ 4 Policy STR 1 - The Development Strategy .............................................................................. 6 What is infrastructure? ......................................................................................................... 8 Engagement ....................................................................................................................... 10 Prioritisation of infrastructure .............................................................................................. 11 Identified risks .................................................................................................................... 12 Timing ................................................................................................................................ 12 Costs .................................................................................................................................
  • Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the European Works Councils in the Transport Sector

    Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the European Works Councils in the Transport Sector

    Study to evaluate the effectiveness of the European Works Councils in the transport sector EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport Directorate DG MOVE Unit D4 Contact: [] E-mail: […]@ec.europa.eu (functional e-mail if existing, or Firstname.Lastname) European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Study to evaluate the effectiveness of the European Works Councils in the transport sector A study by ICF International Director of Study: Tina Weber Written by: Tina Weber, Anne-Mari Hall, Helen Quaresma, Ines Maillart “The information and views set out in this study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein.” Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport December , 2015 EUR [number] EN Study to evaluate the effectiveness of the European Works Councils in the transport sector Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
  • WSRC3290 ASCP 2018 Conference Program FA.Indd

    WSRC3290 ASCP 2018 Conference Program FA.Indd

    AUSTRALASIAN SOCIETY FOR CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2018 AUSTRALASIAN SOCIETY FOR CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COUNTRY THANKS TO Western Sydney University would like to acknowledge the ≥ Professor Peter Hutchings, Dean of the School of Humanities Burramattagal people of the Darug tribe, who are the traditional and Communication Arts custodians of the land on which Western Sydney University at Jacinta Sassine and the student volunteers Parramatta stands. We respectfully acknowledge the Burramattagal ≥ people’s Ancestors and Elders, past and present and acknowledge ≥ Hannah Stark, Timothy Laurie and student volunteers their 60,000 year unceded occupation of these lands. who organized the PG event ≥ Panel organisers: Dr Suzi Adams and Dr Jeremy Smith; Professor WELCOME Thomas M. Besch; Professor Francesco Borghesi; Dr Sean Bowden; Associate Professor Diego Bubbio; Dr Millicent Churcher; Dr Richard The Conference Organising Committee for 2018 extends a warm Colledge; Dr Ingo Farin; Associate Professor Chris Fleming; Dr John welcome to all our international and Australian participants, and all Hadley; Professor Vanessa Lemm; Professor Li Zhi; Associate Professor others associated with the conference. The ASCP conference is this year hosted by Western Sydney University, at our new Parramatta David Macarthur; Associate Professor Sally Macarthur; Dr Jennifer City campus. The event has been planned and developed across Mensch; Professor Nick Mansfield; Dr Talia Morag; Associate Professor this year by members of the Philosophy Research Initiative. Eric S. Nelson; Professor Ping He; Dr Rebecca Hill; Associate Professor Janice Richardson and Dr Jon Rubin; Dr Marilyn Stendera; Dr Omid Tofighian; Professor Miguel Vatter and Dr Nicholas Heron; Dr Allison CONFERENCE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Weir; Dr Magdalena Zolkos.
  • Bruno Lasserre Président De L’Autorité De La Concurrence

    Bruno Lasserre Président De L’Autorité De La Concurrence

    ’Autorité de la concurrence veille au maintien d’un terrain de jeu concurrentiel ouvert et équitable, au plus grand bénéfice des entreprises, appelées à donner le meilleur d’elles-mêmes, et des utilisateurs, qui jouissent d’une offre variée, innovante et conforme à leurs besoins. Dans le cadre de cette mission, le secteur des transports fait depuis longtemps l’objet d’une attention particulière, par l’importance des enjeux qu’il revêt, en termes de mo - bilité, d’aménagement du territoire ou de compétitivité de notre tissu industriel, mais également par la multiplicité des questions de concurrence qu’il suscite. Les dépenses de transport sont en outre contraintes, que l’on soit en milieu rural ou en milieu urbain et pèsent de ce fait dans le budget des ménages. À l’instar d’autres industries de réseau, les transports ont connu ces dernières décen - nies des mutations importantes à mesure que le secteur s’est ouvert à la concurrence. Diversification des opérateurs historiques, séparation entre la gestion du réseau et Ll’exploitation des services qui ont vocation à s’y déployer, respect des missions de service public et/ou de service universel face au risque d’ “écrémage” : autant de sujets sur lesquels l’Autorité a été conduite à se prononcer en mobilisant l’ensemble de ses compétences, contentieuses, consultatives et de contrôle des concentrations. Par ailleurs, à la différence des autres industries de réseau d’envergure nationale ayant été libéralisées, comme l’énergie ou les télécommunications, le secteur des transports n’a fait l’objet que tardivement d’une régulation indépendante.
  • Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States

    Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States

    Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 First Printing 2013 Copyright © 2013, Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, mechanical (including photocopying), recording, taping, or information or retrieval systems—without permission of the pub- lisher. Published by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, New York 10119 Graphics Database: V212 CONTENTS FOREWORD XV PREFACE XVII PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH 3 1.1 Unprecedented Support for High Speed Rail in the U.S. ....................3 1.2 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the U.S. .....4 1.3 Research Objectives . 6 1.4 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Participants ...........................6 1.5 Host Manufacturers and Operators......................................7 1.6 A Snapshot in Time .................................................10 CHAPTER 2 HOST MANUFACTURERS AND OPERATORS, THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 11 2.1 Overview . 11 2.2 Introduction to Host HSR Manufacturers . 11 2.3 Introduction to Host HSR Operators and Regulatory Agencies .
  • TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Formats

    TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Formats

    STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms Management Unit TR0003 (REV 10/98) at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER CA-17-2969 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE A Comparative Analysis of High Speed Rail Station Development into Destination and/or Multi-use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon February 2017 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris Ph.D. / Deike Peters, Ph.D. MTI Report 12-75 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business 3762 San José State University 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER San José, CA 95192-0219 65A0499 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation Final Report Division of Research, Innovation and Systems Information MS-42, PO Box 942873 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT As a burgeoning literature on high-speed rail development indicates, good station-area planning is a very important prerequisite for the eventual successful operation of a high-speed rail station; it can also trigger opportunities for economic development in the station area and the station-city. At the same time, “on the ground” experiences from international examples of high-speed rail stations can provide valuable lessons for the California high-speed rail system in general, and the San Jose Diridon station in particular.
  • Dossier De Pressev 14

    Dossier De Pressev 14

    Assises du ferroviaire Ouvrir un débat national sur l’avenir du modèle français Jeudi 15 septembre 2011 Sommaire 1. Pourquoi des Assises du ferroviaire ? 2. Un débat national sur l’avenir du modèle ferroviaire français Le ferroviaire français au cœur de l’Europe La gouvernance du système ferroviaire L’économie du ferroviaire La filière ferroviaire française 3. Les Assises du ferroviaire : organisation et calendrier Organisation Le calendrier 4. Les grands chantiers déjà sur les rails : La rénovation et la modernisation du réseau La rénovation du matériel roulant Le service annuel Les projets de nouvelles lignes à grande vitesse L’ouverture à la concurrence Annexes Présentation des Présidents des quatre commissions Composition de l’Assemblée plénière Composition des Commissions 1. Pourquoi des Assises du ferroviaire ? Symbole de performance industrielle, de succès commerciaux et d’innovation technologique, le système ferroviaire français est une vitrine pour notre pays. Pourtant, ce secteur est aujourd’hui confronté à des enjeux de taille : ouverture à la concurrence du transport de voyageurs sous l’impulsion des politiques européennes, stagnation voire dégradation des parts de marchés de certains services de transport, besoin de modernisation du réseau pour absorber l’augmentation du trafic et améliorer la qualité de services pour le voyageur… Face à ces défis, le secteur ferroviaire doit trouver un nouveau souffle pour continuer à créer de nouveaux emplois en France et accélérer la conquête de nouveaux marchés. Dans ce contexte, le Président de la République a annoncé le 8 septembre dernier, lors de l’inauguration de la LGV Rhin-Rhône, que Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, ministre de l'Ecologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement, et Thierry Mariani, ministre des Transports, allaient mettre en débat le modèle ferroviaire français de demain.
  • INSTITUTION of LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, LONDON. Some

    INSTITUTION of LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, LONDON. Some

    THE INSTITUTION OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, LONDON. Some French Train Services and Locomotive Performances. BY C. F. BURTT, Member, Lewes. With an abstract of the discussion upon the Paper. NINETEENTH PAPER (OF TRANSACTIONS). SESSION 1913. Read on Friday, October 3rd, 1913, at Caxton Hall, Yictoria Street, Westminster. Presided oYer by Mr. William A. Lelean, MJ.Mech.E., Yice-Chairman. LONDON : gnblisbeb bp tbe Institufion 1913. Price One Shilling and Sixpence net. Downloaded from jil.sagepub.com at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on June 4, 2016 PAPER No. 19. Some French Train Services and Locomotive Performances. BY C. F. BURTT, Member, Lewes. In presenting this paper before the Institution, the author wishes to emphasisc the fact that it has not been written with a i.iew of criticising French practice-as that may be well left to the discussion-but with the idea 'ot bringing to the notice of the meeting the actual practice prevailing on the railways under consideration. To draw comparisons of the methods that prevail in one country with that of another is, in the opinion of the writer, hardly compatible with reason or justice, as the customs and requirements of one nation are frequently so entirely different from that of others. France is served by six great railway systems, each accommodating a \veil defined area which their names indi- cate; the Nord, Est, hlidi, Paris Lyon et M&ditterranCe, Paris a Orleans, and the Etat, tvhich latter serves a district situated between I3orde;iux in the west and Dieppe in the north. France is perhaps unique to the extent that being a country largely devoted to agricultural pursuits, it has few really very large towns besides Paris, Lille, Lyon, Mar- seille, Bordeaux and Nantes, and these are situated many miles apart, and in no instance excepting Bordeaux and Nantes do any two lincs serve the same district or even town of any importance from a competitive point of view.
  • Compendium on Deliberations of Electrical Standards Committee

    Compendium on Deliberations of Electrical Standards Committee

    COMPENDIUM ON DELIBERATIONS OF ELECTRICAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE (1935-2014) ISSUED ON 26-10-2015 BY ELECTRICAL DIRECTORATE RESEARCH DESIGNS AND STANDARDS ORGANISATION MANAK NAGAR, LUCKNOW-226 011 Compendium of ESC 1935-2014 Page 1 INDEX S. No. DETAILS PAGE No. 1. FORWARD 3 2. OBJECTIVE OF ESC 4 3. DELIBERATIONS: 1st to 5th 7-53 4. DELIBERATIONS: 6th to 10th 54-104 5. DELIBERATIONS:11th to 15th 105-157 6. DELIBERATIONS:16th to 20th 158-200 7. DELIBERATIONS:21st to 25th 201-252 8. DELIBERATIONS:26th to 30th 253-301 9. DELIBERATIONS:31st to 35th 302-351 10. DELIBERATIONS:36th to 40th 352-382 11. DELIBERATIONS:41st to 45th 383-411 12. DELIBERATIONS:46th to 50th 412-445 13. DELIBERATIONS:51st to 55th 446-485 14. DELIBERATIONS:56th to 59th 486-525 Compendium of ESC 1935-2014 Page 2 FOREWORD Electrical Standards Committee (ESC) is a highest forum for Railway Electrical Engineers to discuss various issues pertaining to Electrical Department for efficient and economical train operation. This compendium will provide a glimpse of the events and technological upgradation over last 80 years since inception of this committee. As very old records were not available easily, efforts have been made to collect as much records for the ESC, particularly for pre-independence period. Initially separate ESC meetings used to be held for General Services and Traction. From 49th ESC onward, which was held in January’1999 at Pune, a decision was taken to convene a common ESC meeting for all items of Electrical department. This compendium will be updated regularly so that all the records are available at one place.
  • Proposed Candidates to the Board of Directors

    Proposed Candidates to the Board of Directors

    Proposed candidates to the Board You will find hereafter, a brief presentation of candidates to the new Board of Directors. Mr Bernard Bigot Born on 24 January 1950 in Blois (France), Bernard Bigot is a graduate of the École Normale Supérieure de Saint-Cloud, with a higher teaching qualification in the physical sciences and a PhD in chemistry. He was Professor of exceptional class of the Ecole normale supérieure de Lyon from 1981 to 2012 and Director of the Institut de recherches sur la catalyse du CNRS in Villeurbanne from 1998 to 2002. After holding the posts of Assistant Director of Studies and Director of a laboratory at the École Normale Supérieure de Lyon from 1986 to 1993, he was Head of Science and Technology then Director of Research and Technology at the Ministry of National Education, Higher Education and Research from 1993 to 1997. He was then appointed Assistant Director of Research, from 1998 to 2000, then Director of the Ecole normale supérieure de Lyon from 2000 to 2003. From 2002 to 2003, he was Office Director to the Minister for Research and New Technologies, and Assistant Office Director to the Minister for Youth Affairs, National Education and Research. In 2003, he became High Commissioner for Atomic Energy, before being appointed Director-General and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) in 2009. Bernard Bigot is Commander of the Legion of Honour and Officer of the national Order of merit as well as Commander of the Swedish Royal Order of the Polar Star.
  • FERRMED LOCOMOTIVE CONCEPT STUDY 1 2.Pdf

    FERRMED LOCOMOTIVE CONCEPT STUDY 1 2.Pdf

    FERRMED FREIGHT LOCOMOTIVE CONCEPT STUDY By: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 What is FERRMED? ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 FERRMED Objectives .................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The FERRMED Standards.............................................................................................. 5 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 7 3 EUROPEAN NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS .................................................................... 9 4 INTEROPERABILITY AND CROSS-ACCEPTANCE .......................................................... 12 4.1 Interoperability .............................................................................................................. 12 4.2 ERTMS.......................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Cross-Acceptance ......................................................................................................... 21 5 STATE-OF-THE-ART WORLDWIDE LOCOMOTIVES ....................................................... 23 6 REQUIRED STARTING TRACTIVE EFFORT AND POWER TO HAUL “FERRMED TRAINS” .....................................................................................................................................