DOCSLIB.ORG

00034145 Wetlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Global Environment Facility Project of the Government of Lithuania Project information Summary of UNDP and cost-sharing inputs [as per attached budgets] Project number: LIT/03/G31/A/1G/99 Project title: Conservation of Inland Wetland UNDP/GEF: $ 3,261,000 Biodiversity in Lithuania PDF B stage $180,000 PIMS number: 1761 Cost-sharing: Estimated start date: November 2003 Government (MoE): $ 2,239,400 cash/in kind Estimated duration: 5 years Municipalities: $ 829,400 cash/in kind Executing agent: Ministry of Environment ISPA: $ 4,443,300 cash Implementing agent: Nature Heritage Fund SAPARD: $ 815,000 cash Project site: Lithuania‟s Inland Wetlands Other: $ 2,097,300 cash/in kind Beneficiary countries: Lithuania Co- fin. subtotal $ 10,424,4001 ACC sector and subsector: Environment / Environment Enhancement and TOTAL: $ 13,865,400 Management DCAS sector and subsector Natural Resources / Environmental Preservation and Rehabilitation Government sector and G3: Environment subsector: LPAC review date: Primary areas of focus/sub- Promoting Environment and Natural Resources focus: Sustainability Programme officer: Lina Jankauskiene Primary target beneficiaries: Target Place (Environmental Habitats) Brief description: The project objectives are to a) demonstrate improved wetland management in-situ at five globally significant sites, and b) with the lessons learned from these experiences, institutionalize best practices through a formal intersectoral mechanism for replication to other wetland sites throughout Lithuania. The project has six main outputs. Five will deliver biodiversity conservation at the top five priority wetlands in Lithuania (Cepkeliai, Kamanos, Viesvile, Zuvintas and Girutiskis). These five demonstration sites will provide lessons learned and best practices to inform institutionalization, policy dialogue and reform regarding biodiversity conservation and economic and social benefits. The sixth output will result in a formal intersectoral mechanism for institutionalization and replication of best lessons learned in conservation of inland wetland biodiversity. Main activities include the establishment of a system of tradable collection permits for cranberries, the reconversion of farming lands to wetland- friendly agricultural activities, the adoption of biodiversity-friendly forestry protocols, the establishment of a biosphere reserve, strengthening enforcement of reserve regulations and boundaries, restoration of selected wetland habitats, public awareness and public support activities, the gathering and codification of lessons and best practices and the elaboration of a strategy for replication to other wetlands. On behalf of: Signature Date Name & Title Ministry of Environment Mr. Arūnas Kundrotas, Minister Implementing agent Mr. Gediminas Raščius, Director UNDP Ms. Cihan Sultanoglu, Resident Representative 1 The total co-financing for the project document is higher than the amount reflected in the proposal, which was $8,958,400. Additional 1,466,400 is contribution from MoE, which originally was not included into co-financing, as this was contribution to the baseline. After the May Council Meeting, when new rules for co-financing were put in place (see GEF/C.20/6 Rev), the contribution to the baseline was considered as co-financing, and thus its total gives the amount of $10,424,400. 1 INDEX OF CONTENTS 1. COUNTRY OWNERSHIP ............................................................................................................. 5 1.A. COUNTRY ELIGIBILITY ............................................................................................................... 5 1.B. COUNTRY DRIVEN-NESS ............................................................................................................ 5 1.C. ENDORSEMENT ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. PROGRAM & POLICY CONFORMITY .................................................................................... 5 2.A. PROGRAM DESIGNATION & CONFORMITY ................................................................................. 5 2.B. PROJECT DESIGN ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.b.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.b.2. Description of project sites ................................................................................................. 7 2.b.3. Threats affecting the project sites ....................................................................................... 9 2.b.4. Description of proposed project strategy .......................................................................... 12 2.b.5. Institutional Context: a general description ..................................................................... 19 2.b.6. Institutional Context for project implementation .............................................................. 20 2.b.7. Project Implementation Arrangements ............................................................................. 21 2.b.8. Incremental Cost Estimation (see Annex 2F for a full description of the incremental cost analysis) ...................................................................................................................................... 24 2.C. RISKS AND SUSTAINABILITY (INCLUDING FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY) ................................ 25 2.c.1. Risks .................................................................................................................................. 25 2.c.2. Sustainability ..................................................................................................................... 25 2.D. REPLICABILITY ........................................................................................................................ 28 2.E. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................ 28 2.F. MONITORING & EVALUATION .................................................................................................. 29 2.f.1. Indicate how the project design has incorporated lessons from similar projects in the past ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 2.f.2. Describe approach for project M&E system...................................................................... 32 2.f.3. Outline organizational arrangement for implementing M&E ........................................... 36 3. FINANCING .................................................................................................................................. 36 4. INSTITUTIONAL COORDINATION & SUPPORT ............................................................... 39 4.A. CORE COMMITMENTS & LINKAGES.......................................................................................... 39 4.a.1. Describe how the proposed project is located within the IA’s Country/regional/global/sector programs. ................................................................................. 39 4.a.2. GEF activities with potential influence on the proposed project (design and implementation)........................................................................................................................... 40 4.B. CONSULTATION, COORDINATION AND COLLABORATION BETWEEN IAS, AND IAS AND EAS, IF APPROPRIATE. .................................................................................................................................. 40 5. LEGAL CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................... 40 6. RESPONSE TO REVIEWS ......................................................................................................... 41 6.A. COUNCIL .................................................................................................................................. 41 6.B. CONVENTION SECRETARIAT .................................................................................................... 41 6.C. GEF SECRETARIAT ................................................................................................................... 41 NO FURTHER COMMENTS AFTER MAY 2003 COUNCIL MEETING. .................................................. 41 6.D. OTHER IAS AND RELEVANT EAS ............................................................................................. 41 6.E. STAP ........................................................................................................................................ 41 ANNEX 2A: LOG FRAME MATRIX ............................................................................................ 43 ANNEX 2B: ENDORSEMENT LETTER ...................................................................................... 46 ANNEX 2CI: STAP REVIEW ......................................................................................................... 48 2 ANNEX 2CII: RESPONSE TO STAP REVIEW........................................................................... 57 ANNEX 2D: MAPS OF PROJECT SITES..................................................................................... 64 Map 1: Selected five Strict Nature Reserves ..............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Download From

    Download From

    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2 nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3 rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . Evaldas Klimavičius, DD MM YY Direktorate of Dzūkija National Park and Cepkeliai State Strict Nature Reserve Marcinkonys, LT-65303 Varena distr., Lithuania Designation date Site Reference Number Tel.: +370 310 44686; Fax: +370 310 44428 [email protected] Gintautas Kibirkštis Direktorate of Dzūkija National Park and Cepkeliai State Strict Nature Reserve Marcinkonys, LT-65303 Varena distr., Lithuania Tel.: +370 310 44686; Fax: +370 310 44428 [email protected] 2.
  • UAB Cityform LT Įmon Ės Kodas: 304696907 / Žygio G

    UAB Cityform LT Įmon Ės Kodas: 304696907 / Žygio G

    UAB CityForm LT Įmon ės kodas: 304696907 / Žygio g. 97A-101, LT-08236 Vilnius / Tel.: +370 616 54100, el. p.: [email protected] Įmon ės kodas: 160297055 / Taikos pr. 88A, LT-51183 Kaunas / Tel.: 8 (65) 771999, el. p.: [email protected] LAZDIJ Ų RAJONO SAVIVALDYB ĖS PLANAVIMO ADMINISTRACIJOS DIREKTORIUS ORGANIZATORIUS Kodas Juridini ų asmen ų registre 188714992 Vilniaus g. 1, LT-67106 Lazdijai tel. (8 318) 66 108, el.p. [email protected] TERITORIJ Ų PLANAVIMO LAZDIJ Ų RAJONO SAVIVALDYB ĖS TERITORIJOS DOKUMENTO BENDROJO PLANO KEITIMAS PAVADINIMAS PLANUOJAMA TERITORIJA Lazdij ų rajono savivaldyb ės teritorija TERITORIJ Ų PLANAVIMO KOMPLEKSINIS DOKUMENTO R ŪŠIS POR ŪŠIS BENDRASIS PLANAS LYGMUO SAVIVALDYB ĖS ETAPAS RENGIMO STADIJA ESAMOS B ŪKL ĖS ĮVERTINIMAS BYLOS ŽYMUO CF-19U-31 TOMAS I DATA 2019 Atest.Nr. Pareigos Vardas Pavard ė Parašas UAB CityForm LT GITANA MINEIKIEN Ė DIREKTOR Ė PROJEKTO ATP1735 GIEDR Ė RATKUT Ė SKA ČKAUSKIEN Ė VADOV Ė UAB „Geometra“ EGIDIJUS STAŠELIS DIREKTORIUS UAB „Geometra“ ATP1816 GINTAR Ė KARPAVI ČIEN Ė Architekt ė Lazdij ų rajono savivaldyb ės teritorijos bendrojo plano keitimas ESAMOS B ŪKL ĖS ĮVERTINIMAS TURINYS Darb ą parengusi ų specialist ų s ąrašas ...................................................................................................... 4 Įvadas ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Demografin ė situacija .........................................................................................................................
  • 1. Priebalsių Š, Ž Kietinimas Prieš E, Ė, Ę, En Apie Šių Priebalsių Kietinimą

    1. Priebalsių Š, Ž Kietinimas Prieš E, Ė, Ę, En Apie Šių Priebalsių Kietinimą

    KALBOTYRA XXIII (1) 1971 PRIEBALSIŲ KIETINIMAS LIETUVIŲ KALBOS TARMĖsE 1. Priebalsių Š, ž kietinimas prieš e, ė, ę, en Ž. URBANAVIČIOTĖ Apie šių priebalsių kietinimą pradėta rašyti tik pastaraisiais metais. Be skyriaus apie priebalsių kietinimą Z. Zinkevičiaus "Lietuvių dialektologijoje" ir T. Buch straipsnioI, jie niekur plačiau nebuvo nagrinėti. Priebalsiai Š, ž kietai tariami prieš e, ė, ę, en žymiai mažesniame plote, negu J, r, s, z. Prieš e jie kietinami pietų aukštaičių tarmės pietinėje dalyje ir artimesnėse vakarų aukštaičių šnektose į pietus nuo ribos Liubavas - Sangrūda - Rudamina­ Šventežeris-Seirijai-tarp Savilionių ir Kibyšių-Merkinė- Zervynos-Rudnia­ Rodūnia. Eišiškių, Šalčininkų, Dieveniškių, Lazūnų, Zietelos apylinkes į kietini­ mo plotą galima įskirti tik sąlygiškai, nes ten šių priebalsių kietinimas labai nenuo­ seklus, pVZ.: žamė, ažaras, žamas, šašbl, berža!is ir žiimė, šlire, beržii!is, ašeri's, šešeli (Eišiškės); žamė ir žiimė, šlire, beržii!is, šeiva (Vėžionys); žanijas ir šešta (Šalčininkai); parša!is, aršaĮi<J "veršelis", š3iva ir žiimė, žemaū, šiištas, veršii!is (Dieveniškės); žamė" zamė, šapeteis, šašbl, šašatas, šarb;'s, važa!is, naimažasnis ir ziimė, žemi'n, šešta, šeši, šiišetas, šeim{'na (Zietela) ir pan. Priebalsiai š, ž sporadiškai kietinami ir kitose šnektose, neretai net gana toli i šiaurę nuo nu­ rodytos ribos. Daugiausia tokio kietinimo atvejų galima išgirsti tose tarmėse, kur gyventojai daž• nai vartoja lenkų ar baltarusių kalbą. Toks kietinimas žymiai dažniau pasitaiko prieš balsi e, pvz.: žani'su, ažaras (Breslauja), &žaras, žame., Šašu.pe., šaimi'na, šara, gegužala. - geguželė, ša/us (Apsas), ša/uos (Arnionys, Lakaja), žame, šara, pušal/.nis "pušinis" (Šumskas), šašazdešime (Šu• tai), žJmi., diržalis, paršalis (Nemenčinė), žiim(! (Baltamiškis), ždnklas (Slučajus), žiimė, žanras, šiišras, šare (Ismonys), ažarelis (Perloja), ša/alika (Šašuolėliai), žame, Žalva (Inturkė) ir pan.
  • Lithuanian Dialectology Profiles: Problems and Findings”, Aims to Demonstrate a Wide Range of Studies Within Lithuanian Dialectology

    Lithuanian Dialectology Profiles: Problems and Findings”, Aims to Demonstrate a Wide Range of Studies Within Lithuanian Dialectology

    3 Approved for publishing by the Scientific Council of the Institute of the Lithuanian Language Decree Protocol No. MT-50, dated 30 December 2020 Editorial Board: Danguolė Mikulėnienė (Editor-in-Chief) Lietuvių kalbos institutas Ana Stafecka LU Latviešu valodas institūts Miroslaw Jankowiak Akademie věd České republiky Edmundas Trumpa Latvijas universitāte Ilja Lemeškin Univerzita Karlova Special issue editor Violeta Meiliūnaitė Reviewers: Dalia Pakalniškienė Klaipėdos universitetas Liene Markus–Narvila Latvijas universitāte The bibliographic information about this publication is available in the National Bibliographic Data Bank (NBDB) of the Martynas Mažvydas National Library of Lithuania ISBN 978-609-411-279-9 DOI doi.org/10.35321/e-pub.8.problems-and-findings © Institute of the Lithuanian Language, 2020 © Violeta Meiliūnaitė, compilation, 2020 © Contributing authors, 2020 Contents PREFACE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 DANGUOLĖ MIKULĖNIENĖ ISSUES OF PERIODIZATION: DIALECTOLOGICAL THOUGHT, METHODOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND IDEOLOGICAL TURNS ------------------------------------ 8 VIOLETA MEILIŪNAITĖ. STABILITY AND DYNAMICS OF (LITHUANIAN) DIALECTAL NETWORK 38 JURGITA JAROSLAVIENĖ.METHODOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND COMPLEXITY IN COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL SOUND RESEARCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 50 RIMA BAKŠIENĖ.INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INTO THE QUALITATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE VOCALISM VARIANTS IN THE SUBDIALECT OF ŠAKIAI -----------------------------------------
  • Suvestinė Redakcija Nuo 2018-05-03 Iki 2018-11-08 VARĖNOS RAJONO

    Suvestinė Redakcija Nuo 2018-05-03 Iki 2018-11-08 VARĖNOS RAJONO

    Suvestinė redakcija nuo 2018-05-03 iki 2018-11-08 Sprendimas paskelbtas: TAR 2018-02-01, i. k. 2018-01648 Nauja redakcija nuo 2018-02-06: Nr. T-VIII-884, 2018-01-30, paskelbta TAR 2018-02-05, i. k. 2018-01756 VARĖNOS RAJONO SAVIVALDYBĖS TARYBA SPRENDIMAS DĖL VARĖNOS RAJONO SAVIVALDYBĖS VIETINĖS REIKŠMĖS KELIŲ SĄRAŠO PATVIRTINIMO 2005 m. sausio 25 d. Nr. T-V-491 Varėna Vadovaudamasi Lietuvos Respublikos vietos savivaldos įstatymo 16 straipsnio 4 dalimi, Lietuvos Respublikos kelių įstatymo 3 straipsnio 3 dalimi, 6 straipsnio 4 dalimi, Varėnos rajono savivaldybės taryba n u s p r e n d ž i a: Patvirtinti pridedamus: 1. Varėnos rajono savivaldybės vietinės reikšmės kelių Jakėnų seniūnijoje sąrašą. 2. Varėnos rajono savivaldybės vietinės reikšmės kelių Kaniavos seniūnijoje sąrašą. 3. Varėnos rajono savivaldybės vietinės reikšmės kelių Marcinkonių seniūnijoje sąrašą. 4. Varėnos rajono savivaldybės vietinės reikšmės kelių Matuizų seniūnijoje sąrašą. 5. Varėnos rajono savivaldybės vietinės reikšmės kelių Merkinės seniūnijoje sąrašą. 6. Varėnos rajono savivaldybės vietinės reikšmės kelių Valkininkų seniūnijoje sąrašą. 7. Varėnos rajono savivaldybės vietinės reikšmės kelių Varėnos seniūnijoje sąrašą. 8. Varėnos rajono savivaldybės vietinės reikšmės kelių Vydenių seniūnijoje sąrašą. Savivaldybės meras Vidas Mikalauskas PATVIRTINTA Varėnos rajono savivaldybės tarybos 2005 m. sausio 25 d. sprendimu Nr. T-V-491 (Varėnos rajono savivaldybės tarybos 2018 m. sausio 30 d. sprendimo Nr. T-VIII-884 redakcija) VARĖNOS RAJONO SAVIVALDYBĖS VIETINĖS REIKŠMĖS KELIŲ JAKĖNŲ SENIŪNIJOJE SĄRAŠAS Kelio (gatvės) Eil. žymėjimas Kelio (gatvės) Kelio (gatvės) pavadinimas Sutampa su keliu (gatve), m Nr. informacinėje ilgis, m sistemoje 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Jak-1 Zakoriai–Palielukis 3695 2 Jak-2 Užtilčiai–Vergakiemis 1845 3 Jak-3 Damononys–Kaniūkai–Kalviai 5090 Kaniūkų k.
  • T-Viii-1164 Varėnos Rajono Savivaldybės Taryba

    T-Viii-1164 Varėnos Rajono Savivaldybės Taryba

    VARĖNOS RAJONO SAVIVALDYBĖS TARYBA SPRENDIMAS DĖL PRITARIMO VARĖNOS RAJONO SAVIVALDYBĖS ADMINISTRACIJOS DIREKTORIAUS IR ADMINISTRACIJOS 2018 METŲ VEIKLOS ATASKAITAI 2019 m. vasario 19 d. Nr. T-VIII-1164 Varėna Vadovaudamasi Lietuvos Respublikos vietos savivaldos įstatymo 16 straipsnio 2 dalies 19 punktu, 29 straipsnio 8 dalies 9 punktu ir Varėnos rajono savivaldybės tarybos veiklos reglamento, patvirtinto 2015 m. birželio 30 d. sprendimu Nr. T-VIII-89 „Dėl Varėnos rajono savivaldybės tarybos veiklos reglamento tvirtinimo“, 201, 204 ir 205 punktais, Varėnos rajono savivaldybės taryba n u s p r e n d ž i a: 1. Pritarti Varėnos rajono savivaldybės administracijos direktoriaus ir administracijos 2018 metų veiklos ataskaitai (pridedama). 2. Paskelbti Varėnos rajono savivaldybės interneto svetainėje www.varena.lt šio sprendimo 1 punkte nurodytą ataskaitą. Savivaldybės meras Algis Kašėta Bendrojo skyriaus vedėja Irma Krajauskienė 2019-02-19 T-VIII-1164 PRITARTA Varėnos rajono savivaldybės tarybos 2019 m. vasario 19 d. sprendimu Nr. T-VIII-1164 VARĖNOS RAJONO SAVIVALDYBĖS ADMINISTRACIJOS DIREKTORIAUS IR ADMINISTRACIJOS 2018 METŲ VEIKLOS ATASKAITA Varėna 2019 m. vasario 19 d. T-VIII-1164 TURINYS ĮVADAS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. STRATEGINIS PLANAVIMAS ................................................................................................. 8 III. SAVIVALDYBĖS BIUDŽETO VYKDYMAS .....................................................................
  • SUMMARY of Disertation2014 02 17-2

    SUMMARY of Disertation2014 02 17-2

    VILNIUS UNIVERSITY NATURE RESEARCH CENTRE INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY VIOLETA PUKELYT Ė BALTR ŪNIEN Ė THE INFLUENCE OF GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMORPHOLOGICAL REGIONS (CASE STUDY OF SOUTH LITHUANIA) Summary of Doctoral Dissertation Physical sciences, Physical geography (06 P) Vilnius, 2014 The dissertation was prepared at the Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography in 2009–2012. Scientific supervisor Prof. Dr. Hab. Algimantas Česnulevi čius (Vilnius University, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P) The dissertation is defended at the Council of Geographical Research of Vilnius University: Chairman Prof. Dr. Ar ūnas Bukantis (Vilnius University, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Members: Prof. Dr. Inga Dailidien ė (Klaip ėda University, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Dr. Virgilija Gregorauskien ė (Lithuanian Geological Survey under the Ministry of Environment, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Prof. Dr. Egidijus Rimkus (Vilnius University, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Doc. Dr. Julius Taminskas (Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Opponents: Dr. Albertas Bitinas (Klaip ėda University, Physical sciences, Geology – 05 P). Dr. Darius Jarmalavi čius (Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). The official defence of the dissertation is due to be held at the public meeting of the Physical Science Council at the Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography on March 25, 2014, at 15.00 Address: T. Šev čenkos str. 13, LT-03223, Vilnius, Lithuania. The summary of the dissertation was distributed on February 24, 2014 The dissertation is available in the libraries of Vilnius University and Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography.
  • Pdfats 2011 Role of Rangers in Natura

    Pdfats 2011 Role of Rangers in Natura

    Study visit 2012 Report to the Alfred Toepfer Nature Heritage Scholarship Tünde Ludnai, Kiskunság NP Directorate, Hungary Application reference no.: ATS-2009-1305884996 Main theme: Biodiversity Project title: Role of Rangers in Natura 2000 site management 1. Rationale Management of Natura 2000 sites is a hot topic all over the European Union, since the implementation and enforcement of the two nature directives in the Member States is more and more controlled and criticized by the European Commission (EC), supported by many European Court decisions, as well as by NGO movements. Following the more or less successful designation of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) under the Habitats Directive, the Commission puts more and more emphasis on the management issues of Natura 2000 sites including the conservation priorities and measures applied, as well as site management plan preparations and their implementation in the practice. Protected area managers and park ranger services have a lot of experience in the field of in situ – meaning not theoretic - nature management in order to ensure the favourable conservation status of nationally protected species and habitats, but also of those of community importance, listed in the different annexes of the two nature directives. A more effective use of this extended knowledge and experience can be a key tool in the process of ensuring the appropriate protection of the rich and wonderful biodiversity of the old continent. Rangers - working for most of their time in the field, meeting farmers, hunters, foresters, and other stakeholders day to day - have an extremely important role not only in the management of nationally protected areas, but also in that of Natura 2000 sites.
  • Administrative Case No. I-757-422/2012 Judicial Proceedings No

    Administrative Case No. I-757-422/2012 Judicial Proceedings No

    Administrative case No. I-757-422/2012 Judicial proceedings No. 3-62-3-00115-2011-5 Category of procedural decision: 2.3.1; 2.6; 2.7; 74. (S) KAUNAS REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT J U D G E M E N T ON BEHALF OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA 5 July 2012 Kaunas the Panel of Judges of the Kaunas Regional Administrative Court consisting of Judges Janina Vitunskienė (Chairman and Rapporteur), Daina Kukalienė and Jolanta Medvedevienė, Secretary Anželika Kuicaitė, in the presence of the representatives of the Claimant, the association Rudaminos Bendruomenė, namely, Chair R. C., R. V. and Attorney-at-Law Ramunė Dulevičienė, the representative of the Defendant, the Alytus Regional Environmental Protection Department, Dalė Amšiejienė, the representative of the third parties concerned UAB SWECO Lietuva and UAB SWECO International A. V., the representatives of the third party concerned Litgrid AB, namely, R.Č., Attorney-at-Law Nijolė Vaičiūnaitė and Attorney-at- Law Vitoldas Kumpa, the representatives of the third party concerned LitPol Link Sp. Z. o. o., namely, Attorney-at-Law Nijolė Vaičiūnaitė and J. N., the representative of the third party concerned, the Lazdijai District Municipality Administration Kęstutis Jasiulevičius, and the representatives of the third party concerned, the Alytus Territorial Division of the Department of Cultural Heritage under the Ministry of Culture, Alius Baranauskas and Dalia Lungevičienė, in the absence of the representatives of the following third parties concerned: the Marijampolė Municipality Administration, the Kalvarija

  • Lithuanian Sector of Transport and Communications 2020 Second Quarter

    LITHUANIAN SECTOR OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS 2020 SECOND QUARTER The Nordic Investment Bank to fund the expansion of Klaipėda Seaport The Nordic Investment Bank (NIB) and Klaipėda State Seaport Authority signed a 19-year credit agreement on the upgrade of Klaipėda Seaport’s infrastructure. The agreed funding will cover up to 68 million euros of investments in the reconstruction of the port’s quays. The aim of the project is to expand the quays and deepen the shipping channel to enable the port to accept larger ships. The ability to accept larger ships will improve the port’s and its operators’ productivity. Successful implementation of the project is expected to increase the port’s annual loading capacity by 19.1 million tonnes, or 29% of the current capacity. The total value of the project is 136 million euros. The project is to be completed by the end of 2023. Lithuania approved the Guidelines for the Lithuania will seek to have a virtual airline Development of 5G for 2020–2025 In order to improve Lithuania’s accessibility by air, the Ministry of Transport and Communications made The Government approved the Guidelines for the development of fifth generation a proposal to the Government to establish a national mobile communications (5G) of the Republic of Lithuania for 2020–2025. The air carrier that would be a virtual airline. This would aim of these guidelines is to ensure a gradual and controlled development of provide more flexibility in responding to Lithuania’s 5G communications, creating an effective legal and investment environment in air transportation needs independently from the Lithuania.
  • Lithuanian Tourism Product Manual 2007

    Lithuanian Tourism Product Manual 2007

    Lithuanian Tourism Product Manual 2007 LITHUANIAN STATE DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM 2006 CONTENTS BASIC DATA..................................................................................... 3 ALYTUS COUNTY......................................................................52 USEFUL.INFORMATION................................................................. 3 ALYTUS.TOWN.AND.DISTRICT................................................52 TRANSPORT..................................................................................... 4 VArėNA District......................................................................53 BY.AIR............................................................................................... 4 DRUSKININKAI.RESORT...........................................................54 BY.SEA............................................................................................... 5 LAZDIJAI.DISTRICT....................................................................56 LOCAL.FERRIES.............................................................................. 5 VArėNA District......................................................................57 BY.CAR.............................................................................................. 5 UTENA COUNTY........................................................................59 BY.COACH........................................................................................ 5 UTENA.DISTRICT........................................................................59
  • LITHUANIA. Nature Tourism Map SALDUS JELGAVA DOBELE IECAVA AIZKRAUKLE

    LITHUANIA. Nature Tourism Map SALDUS JELGAVA DOBELE IECAVA AIZKRAUKLE

    LITHUANIA. Nature tourism map SALDUS JELGAVA DOBELE IECAVA AIZKRAUKLE LIEPĀJA L AT V I A 219 Pikeliai BAUSKA Laižuva Nemunėlio 3 6 32 1 Radviliškis LITHUANIA. Kivyliai Židikai MAŽEIKIAI 34 ŽAGARĖ 170 7 NAUJOJI 7 Skaistgirys E 0 2 0 KAMANOS ŽAGARĖ 9 SKUODAS 4 AKMENĖ 36 1 153 1 Ylakiai NATURE REGIONAL 5 Kriukai Tirkšliai 3 Medeikiai 1 RESERVE 6 PARK Krakiai 5 5 5 1 NATURE TOURISM MAP Žemalė Bariūnai Žeimelis AKMENĖ Kruopiai Užlieknė 31 Jurdaičiai 1 2 Rinkuškiai Širvenos ež. Lenkimai VIEKŠNIAI 5 JONIŠKIS 0 Saločiai Daukšiai 4 9 Balėnos BIRŽAI Mosėdis E 6 SCALE 1 : 800 000 6 BIRŽAI 8 VENTA 7 REGIONAL 1 SEDA 2 N e 35 Barstyčiai 37 1 PARK Gataučiai 5 2 m VENTA 2 1 u 1 5 n Žemaičių Vaškai 2 ė Papilė 1 l SALANTAI Kalvarija REGIONAL is Plinkšių PARK Raubonys REGIONAL ež. Gruzdžiai 2 PARK 1 Linkavičiai A 3 Grūšlaukė Nevarėnai LINKUVA Pajiešmeniai 1 4 2 1 4 Krinčinas 6 1 3 A 1 6 1 Ustukiai Meškuičiai Mūša Juodupė Darbėnai SALANTAI -Li Šventoji Platelių Tryškiai 15 el Alsėdžiai 5 up 1 Narteikiai ė 5 ež. 1 1 Plateliai Drąsučiai 2 PASVALYS 4 6 ŽEMAITIJA Naisiai 0 2 TELŠIAI Eigirdžiai Verbūnai 15 2 Lygumai PANDĖLYS Šateikiai NATIONAL KURŠĖNAI JONIŠKĖLIS Girsūdai Kūlupėnai PARK Degaičiai E272 A11 Kužiai PAKRUOJIS Meškalaukis ROKIŠKIS Rūdaičiai 8 Skemai 1 1 VABALNINKAS Mastis Dūseikiai A 50 0 A 1 11 Micaičiai a Rainiai t A PALANGA a 1 i n Ginkūnai 9 o č Klovainiai Ryškėnai e 2 Prūsaliai Babrungas y Vijoliai u Kavoliškis OBELIAI 72 Viešvėnai v V v E2 ir Kairiai ė Pumpėnai .