DOCSLIB.ORG

On-Orbit Observations of Conjuncting Space Objects Prior to the Time of Closest Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On-Orbit Observations of Conjuncting Space Objects Prior to the Time of Closest Approach CANUNCLASSIFIED On-OrbitObservationsofConjunctingSpace ObjectsPriortothetimeofClosestApproach RobertLauchieScott StefanThorsteinson DRDC–OttawaResearchCentre ViqarAbbasi CanadianSpaceAgency TheJournaloftheAstronauticalSciences Springer DateofPublicationfromExtPublisher:November2020 ThebodyofthisCANUNCLASSIFIEDdocumentdoesnotcontaintherequiredsecuritybannersaccordingtoDND securitystandards.However,itmustbetreatedasCANUNCLASSIFIEDandprotectedappropriatelybasedonthe termsandconditionsspecifiedonthecoveringpage. DefenceResearchandDevelopmentCanada ExternalLiterature(P) DRDC-RDDC-2020-P218 December2020 CANUNCLASSIFIED CANUNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANTINFORMATIVESTATEMENTS ThisdocumentwasreviewedforControlledGoodsbyDefenceResearchandDevelopmentCanadausingtheScheduletothe DefenceProductionAct. Disclaimer:ThisdocumentisnotpublishedbytheEditorialOfficeofDefenceResearchandDevelopmentCanada,anagencyofthe DepartmentofNationalDefenceofCanadabutistobecataloguedintheCanadianDefenceInformationSystem(CANDIS),the nationalrepositoryforDefenceS&Tdocuments.HerMajestytheQueeninRightofCanada(DepartmentofNationalDefence) makesnorepresentationsorwarranties,expressedorimplied,ofanykindwhatsoever,andassumesnoliabilityfortheaccuracy, reliability,completeness,currencyorusefulnessofanyinformation,product,processormaterialincludedinthisdocument.Nothing inthisdocumentshouldbeinterpretedasanendorsementforthespecificuseofanytool,techniqueorprocessexaminedinit.Any relianceon,oruseof,anyinformation,product,processormaterialincludedinthisdocumentisatthesoleriskofthepersonso usingitorrelyingonit.Canadadoesnotassumeanyliabilityinrespectofanydamagesorlossesarisingoutoforinconnection withtheuseof,orrelianceon,anyinformation,product,processormaterialincludedinthisdocument. Templateinuse:EOPublishingAppforCR-ELEng2019-01-03-v1.dotm © HerMajestytheQueeninRightofCanada(DepartmentofNationalDefence),2020 © SaMajestélaReineendroitduCanada(MinistèredelaDéfensenationale),2020 CANUNCLASSIFIED On-OrbitObservationsofConjuncting SpaceObjectsPriortotheTimeofClosest Approach RobertLauchieScott,Stefan Thorsteinson&ViqarAbbasi TheJournaloftheAstronautical Sciences ISSN0021-9142 JAstronautSci DOI10.1007/s40295-020-00236-x 1 23 YourarticleispublishedundertheCreative CommonsAttributionlicensewhichallows userstoread,copy,distributeandmake derivativeworks,aslongastheauthorof theoriginalworkiscited.Youmayself- archivethisarticleonyourownwebsite,an institutionalrepositoryorfunder’srepository andmakeitpubliclyavailableimmediately. 1 23 The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-020-00236-x ORIGINALARTICLE Open Access On-Orbit Observations of Conjuncting Space Objects Prior to the Time of Closest Approach Robert Lauchie Scott 1 & Stefan Thorsteinson 1 & Viqar Abbasi 2 Accepted: 11 September 2020/ # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Conjunction assessment of space objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) generally uses information collected by ground-based space surveillance sensors. These sensors track both the primary object (normally an active satellite) and the secondary object (typically space debris). The tracking data is used to update both objects’ orbits for collision risk assessment. The primary satellite’s involvement in this process is that of a satellite in jeopardy - the primary satellite does not usually contribute tracking data on the secondary as they are typically unequipped to do so. In this paper, an examination how an at-risk LEO primary satellite could obtain optical tracking data on a secondary object prior to the Time of Closest Approach (TCA) and assess its own collision risk without the need for additional ground-based space surveillance data is performed. This analysis was made possible by using in-situ optical measurements of space objects conjuncting with the Canadian NEOSSat Space Situational Awareness R&D microsatellite. By taking advantage of the near “constant-bearing, decreasing range” observing geometry formed during a LEO conjunction, NEOSSat can collect astrometric and photometric measurements of the secondary object in the time prior to TCA, or in the multiple half-orbits preceding TCA. This paper begins by describing the in-situ phenomenology of optically observed conjunc- tions in terms of the observing approach, geometry and detected astrometric and photo- metric characteristics. It was found that conjuncting objects are detectable to magnitude 16 and astrometric observations can be used for position covariances in the computation of probability of collision. Illustrative examples are provided. In orbits prior to TCA, in-track positioning error is improved by a factor of two or more by processing space-based This article belongs to the Special Topic Section: Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies (AMOS 2018 & 2019) Guest Editors: James M. Frith, Lauchie Scott, Islam Hussein An earlier version of this article was first presented at the 20th Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, held in Wailea, Maui, Hawaii, September 17-20, 2019. * Robert Lauchie Scott Lauchie.Scott@drdc–rddc.gc.ca 1 Defence R&D Canada Ottawa, 3701 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1A 0Z4, Canada 2 Canadian Space Agency, 6767 Route d’Aeroport, St. Hubert, QC J3Y 8Y9, Canada The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences observations on a filtered position estimate of the secondary. However, cross-track posi- tioning knowledge is negligibly improved due to the inherent astrometric measurement precision of the NEOSSat sensor and the oblique observing geometry during conjunction observations. A short analysis of object detectability where star trackers could be used to perform similar observations finds that larger payload-sized objects would generally be detectable. However, smaller debris objects would require higher sensitivity from the star tracker if employed for optical conjunction derisk observations. Keywords Conjunctions . Debris avoidance . Space situational awareness . Spacedomain awareness . NEOSSat Introduction Satellite operators are continuing to manage the increasing number of conjunction (close approach) warnings due to the growing number of debris objects in Earth orbit. In Canada, operators of space assets in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) rely on conjunction warnings provided by the US Air Force’s 18th Space Control Squadron (18th SPCS) which use orbital data collected by the Space Surveillance Network (SSN) [1]. The 18th SPCS offers Advanced Screening services [1, 2], providing conjunction warnings forecasted up to 7 days in advance of the Time of Closest Approach (TCA) providing operators increased time to analyze collision risk and create manuever plans. These warnings take the form of Conjunction Data Messages (CDMs), a standardized text format enabling rapid evaluation of collision risk of two space objects [1]. In the lead-up to TCA, space surveillance sensors acquire increased tracking data on both space objects increasing their positioning knowledge and help validate the actual risk. Risk is generally estimated by computing the Probability of Collision (PoC) that two space objects could collide based on the primary and secondary’s orbital position covariance and their spherical hard-body radii. In Canadian space operations a PoC exceeding 10−6 is considered to be a “warning” criteria prompting increased monitoring of the two objects’ conjunction. PoCs exceeding 10−4 are considered “action” criteria by both the Canadian Space Operations Centre (CanSpOC) and the Canadian Space Agency’s Satellite Operations team. PoCs exceeding 10−4 triggers enhanced orbital analysis or debris avoidance maneuvers [2, 3] if the satellite has the capability to manuever. This model of conjunction assessment works relatively well for the current population of space objects. However, this technique inherently relies on tracking data collected by ground-based sensors in the time prior to TCA. The primary satellite does not contribute to the risk assessment, nor does it collect observations on the secondary during the days (or hours) leading up to the conjunction. The conjunction event itself is generally unobserved by Space Situational Awareness (SSA) sensors to validate that the objects safely passed one another. The collision avoidance process is also hindered by infrequent ground station accesses limiting the number of opportunities that a satellite operator can upload maneuver commands in response to new orbital data. In an era of upcoming mega-constellations, satellite operators may not be able to provide the individual attention required for each constellation asset for conjunction assessment. This will likely force the use of automation and independent tracking data as a requirement for future space systems to help mitigate orbital collision risk. In this paper, an expanded question is asked: Can a satellite take optical observations on conjuncting space objects to independently assess the risk of collision? The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences In 2018, NEOSSat, a Space Situational Awareness (SSA) microsatellite, jointly oper- ated by the Canadian Space Agency and Defence R&D Canada, began a series of observational experiments observing space objects conjuncting with it. The intent of this experimentation was to optically characterizeconjuncting space objects to determine if self- protection is a possibility if enough onboard computational autonomy were available to track, detect and estimate orbits. While NEOSSat does not have the on-board computa- tional capabilities to independently update a conjuncting space object’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NASA) Memoranda and Reports Concerning the Decommissioning of the International Space Station (ISS), 2010-2016
    Description of document: Unpublished National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) memoranda and reports concerning the decommissioning of the International Space Station (ISS), 2010-2016 Requested date: 28-July-2016 Released date: 05-April-2017 Posted date: 21-May-2018 Source of document: NASA Headquarters 300 E Street, SW Room 5Q16 Washington, DC 20546 Fax: (202) 358-4332 Email: [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center 2101 NASA Parkway Houston, Texas 77058-3696 April 5, 2017 Replytoattn.of AD91 l/JSC FOIA Office REF: 16-JSC-F-00829 - Final Release Thank you for your Freedom oflnformation Act (FOIA) request dated and received in the NASA Headquarters FOIA Office on July 28, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Baikonur-International Space Station : International Approach to Lunar Exploration
    ICEUM4, 10-15 July 2000, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Baikonur-International Space Station : International Approach to Lunar Exploration Gulnara Omarova, National Aerospace Agency; Chinghis Omarov, ISU Summer Session '98 alumni On 20th November 1998 our aircraft made soft landing at the Baikonur airport. I was among onboard passengers - officials from Kazakhstan Space, press and diplomats. We all were invited to attend the launch of the International Space Station (ISS) first component (the Russian-made Zarya or Functional Cargo Module FGB) by Proton launch-vehicle at the Baikonur spaceport. Two hours before ISS first module launch we joined the official delegations from NASA, Russian Space Agency (RSA), ESA, Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and NASDA to see the modified facilities of both "Energiya" Corp. and Khrunichev's Proton assembly-and- test building. Mr. Yuri Koptev, Chief of RSA and Mr. Dan Goldin, NASA Administrator actively were drinking russian tea and talking about crucial issues of the International Space Station and the future of Space Exploration. In fact, Cold War is over and the world's top space powers accomplishments are stunning: • The first human flight in space in 1961; • Human space flight initiatives to ascertain if and how long a human could survive in space; • Project Gemini (flights during 1965-1966) to practice space operations, especially rendezvous and docking of spacecraft and extravehicular activity; • Project Apollo (flights during 1968-1972) to explore the Moon; • Space Shuttle's flights (1981 - present); • Satellite programs; • A permanently occupied space station "Mir" (during 1976-1999); • A permanently occupied International Space Station presently underway. We and a few people approached them to learn much more particulars of their talking and to ask them most interesting questions.
    [Show full text]
  • IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines
    IADC-02-01 Revision 2 Mar 2020 IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines Issued by IADC Steering Group and Working Group 4 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. 1 Revision History .................................................................................................................... 2 List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 3 1 Scope ............................................................................................................................. 6 2 Application ...................................................................................................................... 6 3 Terms and definitions ..................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Space Debris ........................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Spacecraft, Launch Vehicles, and Orbital Stages .................................................... 6 3.3 Orbits and Protected Regions ................................................................................. 7 3.4 Mitigation Measures and Related Terms ................................................................. 8 3.5 Operational Phases ................................................................................................. 8 4 General Guidance .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treaties and Other International Acts Series 94-1115 ______
    TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 94-1115 ________________________________________________________________________ SPACE Cooperation Memorandum of Understanding Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CANADA Signed at Washington November 15, 1994 with Appendix NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 (80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— “. .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence . of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.” CANADA Space: Cooperation Memorandum of Understanding signed at Washington November 15, 1994; Entered into force November 15, 1994. With appendix. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between the UNITED STATES NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION and the CANADIAN SPACE AGENCY concerning COOPERATION IN THE FLIGHT OF THE MEASUREMENTS OF POLLUTION IN THE TROPOSPHERE (MOPITT) INSTRUMENT ON THE NASA POLAR ORBITING PLATFORM AND RELATED SUPPORT FOR AN INTERNATIONAL EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEM 2 The United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (hereinafter "NASA") and the Canadian Space Agency (hereinafter "CSA")
    [Show full text]
  • International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) Provides an Overview of ISECG Activities, Products and Accomplishments in the Past Year
    Annual Report 2012 of the International Space Exploration Coordination Group INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION COORDINATION GROUP ISECG Secretariat Keplerlaan 1, PO Box 299, NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands +31 (0) 71 565 3325 [email protected] ISECG publications can be found on: http://www.globalspaceexploration.org/ 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Executive Summary 4 3. Background 5 4. Activities 4.1. Overview 7 4.2. Activities on ISECG Level 7 4.3. Working Group Activities 8 4.3.1. Exploration Roadmap Working Group (ERWG) 8 4.3.2. International Architecture Working Group (IAWG) 9 4.3.3. International Objectives Working Group (IOWG) 10 4.3.4. Strategic Communications Working Group (SCWG) 10 Annex: Space Exploration Highlights of ISECG Member Agencies 12 1. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI), Italy 13 2. Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES), France 15 3. Canadian Space Agency (CSA), Canada 17 4. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Germany 21 5. European Space Agency (ESA) 23 6. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Japan 28 7. Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI), Republic of Korea 30 8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), USA 31 9. State Space Agency of Ukraine (SSAU), Ukraine 33 10. UK Space Agency (UKSA), United Kingdom 35 3 1 Introduction The 2012 Annual Report of the International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) provides an overview of ISECG activities, products and accomplishments in the past year. In the annex many of the ISECG participating agencies report on national space exploration highlights in 2012. 2 Executive Summary ISECG was established in response to the “The Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination” (GES) developed by 14 space agencies1 and released in May 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Space Agency
    Canadian Space Agency ERIC LALIBERTÉ DIRECTOR GENERAL, SPACE UTILIZATION Outline • Mandate & Objectives • International Collaboration • Key Activities • Flagship Missions • Scientific Activities • Social and Economic Benefits • Strategic Implications 2 Outline Mandate Promote the peaceful use and development of space, to advance the knowledge of space through science and to ensure that space science and technology provide social and economic benefits for Canadians Departmental Results Space Space Canada's research and Canadians information and investments in development engage with technologies space benefit the advances space improve the lives Canadian science and of Canadians economy technology 3 International Collaboration • All space-faring countries rely on international collaboration • Canada a critical contributor to the US; entrusted with critical components • 21 international MOUs that provide a framework for project level collaboration with X countries • Only non-European Cooperating Member of the European Space Agency (ESA) • Key partner on the International Space Station • Founding member of the International Charter on Space and Major Disasters 4 Key Activities Exploration – Leads Canada’s participation in the International Space Station (ISS), planetary exploration missions and astronomy missions Satellites – Leads the implementation of the earth observation/science satellites to ensure GoC needs are met for high quality space data, applications and services essential for the provision of services to Canadians Technology
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 6 April-June 2020 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 6 The Crew Dragon mission to the ISS and the Commercial Crew Program ..................................... 6 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 7 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 7 COVID-19 and the European space sector ....................................................................... 7 Space technologies for European defence ...................................................................... 7 ESA Earth Observation Missions ................................................................................... 8 Thales Alenia Space among HLS competitors ................................................................... 8 Advancements for the European Service Module ............................................................... 9 Airbus for the Martian Sample Fetch Rover ..................................................................... 9 New appointments in ESA, GSA and Eurospace ................................................................ 10 Italy introduces Platino, regions launch Mirror Copernicus .................................................. 10 DLR new research observatory ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HP ENVY ISS Printer Fact Sheet
    HP ENVY ISS Printer Fact Sheet In 2016, NASA began launching HP ZBook Workstations to the International Space Station (ISS). Approximately 120 ZBooks will be deployed to support its mission operations and utilization objectives including sparing. In 2017, NASA selected the HP OfficeJet 5740 Printer as a “Next Generation Printer” to replace the existing printing capability onboard the ISS. In response to this selection, HP developed a custom HP ENVY ISS Printer for use in the ISS. While the bulk of the HP ENVY ISS Printer is off-the-shelf, NASA had a list of requirements that the printer needed in order to safely operate onboard the ISS including: ▪ Paper management in zero-G ▪ Flame retardant plastics* ▪ Waste ink management in zero-G ▪ Glass removal ▪ Wired and wireless connectivity ▪ Printing in multiple orientations (0⁰, 90⁰, 180⁰ & 270⁰ positions) ▪ Environmental Testing (EMI, Materials, Acoustics, Flammability*, Off-gassing, Power Compatibility, etc.) The zero-G requirements were the most challenging to meet and verify due to their unique nature. Through creative reengineering and the use of specialized materials, including components 3D-printed using HP’s Multi Jet Fusion technology and 3D High Reusability PA 12 Glass Beads material, the HP ENVY ISS Printer successfully met all of NASA’s requirements. The ISS Crew members print about two reams of paper a month in total across all printers. Hardcopies are used for procedural and mission critical information like Emergency E-Books, inventory Return trajectories, timelines, and personal items, including letters and photographs from home. The HP ENVY ISS Printers are currently scheduled to launch to the ISS on the Space-X 14 rocket.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Space Agency
    CANADIAN SPACE AGENCY Performance Report For the period ending March 31, 2008 ________________________ Minister of Industry TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: OVERVIEW............................................................................................... 2 1.1 Minister's Message.................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Management Representation Statement.................................................................. 4 1.3 Summary Information............................................................................................. 5 1.3.1) CSA Program Activity Architecture....................................................................... 10 1.4 Department Performance - Summary ................................................................... 12 SECTION 2: ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM ACTIVITIES BY STRATEGIC OUTCOME ............................................................................................. 17 2.1 Space Based Earth Observation............................................................................ 17 2.2 Space Science and Exploration............................................................................. 22 2.3 Satellite Communications..................................................................................... 26 2.4 Generic Space Activities in support of EO, SE and SC........................................ 31 2.5 Space Awareness and Learning ............................................................................ 34 2.6 Corporate
    [Show full text]
  • When the Canadian Space Agency Was Established in 1989, It Was For
    CSA Statement for PAROS GGE Open Session Panel: Exchange with Representatives of national space agencies Delivered by: Eleonora Agnew, Canadian Space Agency 1 February, 2019 When the Canadian Space Agency was established in 1989, it was for the objective of promoting the peaceful use and development of space, to advance the knowledge of space through science, and to ensure that space science and technology provide socio-economic benefits for Canadians. CSA cannot fulfill its mission to provide socioeconomic benefits to Canadians through a space program if space is no longer viable for peaceful exploration and use. Canada and CSA; therefore, strongly support the implementation of Transparency and Confidence Building Measures or TCBMs as vital to maintaining space as a safe, secure and sustainable environment for the benefit of all humankind. TCBMs can solidify international norms in outer space, creating greater mutual understanding and the reduction of tensions, and ultimately contribute to a safe, sustainable and secure outer space environment. Such measures offer pragmatic steps to increase information sharing between states, reduce miscalculations based on the misperception of the actions of others in space and build overall confidence amongst all states in the continued peaceful use of outer space. By building increased trust and openness in the space environment, we create the climate of confidence necessary to potentially develop a legally binding measures governing outer space activities in the future. Canada supports the implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Space Stations
    Order Code IB93017 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Space Stations Updated November 17, 2005 Marcia S. Smith Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Introduction The Space Station Program: 1984-1993 Space Station Freedom 1993 Redesign — the Clinton Administration Restructuring The International Space Station (ISS): 1993-Present ISS Design, Cost, Schedule, and Lifetime September 1993-January 2001: The Clinton Administration 2001-Present: The George W. Bush Administration Reviews of NASA’s Cost Estimates and Adding Funds for ISS Congressional Action FY2005 FY2006 International Partners The Original Partners: Europe, Canada, and Japan Russia Risks and Benefits of Russian Participation ISS and U.S. Nonproliferation Objectives, Including the Iran Nonproliferation Act (INA) Key Issues For Congress Maintaining ISS Operations While the Shuttle Is Grounded Ensuring U.S. Astronaut Participation in Long-Duration Missions Impact of President Bush’s Vision for Space Exploration, Including a Potential Gap in U.S. Human Access to Space LEGISLATION IB93017 11-17-05 Space Stations SUMMARY Congress continues to debate NASA’s “Moon/Mars” Vision instead of the broadly- International Space Station (ISS), a perma- based program that was planned. nently occupied facility in Earth orbit where astronauts live and conduct research. Canada, Japan, and several European Congress appropriated approximately $35 countries became partners with NASA in billion for the program from FY1985-2005. building the space station in 1988; Russia The initial FY2006 ISS request was $2.180 joined in 1993. Except for money paid to billion: $1.857 billion for construction and Russia, there is no exchange of funds among operations and $324 million for research to be the partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Space Agency
    CSA-DSTRF-SOW-0001 Canadian Space Agency Post-ISS Human Spaceflight Contributions – Deep Space Telecommunications (DST) RF Concept Study Statement of Work (SOW) Initial Release April 06, 2017 FOR CANADIAN SPACE AGENCY USE ONLY This document and the information contained herein are not to be used for any purpose other than to accomplish Canadian Space Agency programs and projects whether they are completely Canadian initiatives or in cooperation with International Partners. The contents of this document are not to be disclosed or transferred in whole or in part, to any third party without the prior written consent of the Canadian Space Agency. © HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA 2017 CSA-DSTRF-SOW-0001 Initial Release This Page Intentionally Left Blank ii CSA-DSTRF-SOW-0001 Initial Release This Page Intentionally Left Blank CSA-DSTRF-SOW-0001 Initial Release TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 OBJECTIVE ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 HIGH-LEVEL DESCRIPTION OF THE BLEO CONCEPT ..................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 BLEO Notional Architecture .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]