DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia: Arms Control, Disarmament and International Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia: Arms Control, Disarmament and International Security RUSSIA: ARMS CONTROL, DISARMAMENT AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY IMEMO SUPPLEMENT TO THE RUSSIAN EDITION OF THE SIPRI YEARBOOK 2011 MOSCOW 2012 RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF WORLD ECONOMY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (IMEMO) RUSSIA: ARMS CONTROL, DISARMAMENT AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY IMEMO SUPPLEMENT TO THE RUSSIAN EDITION OF THE SIPRI YEARBOOK 2011 Preface by Alexander DYNKIN Editors Alexei ARBATOV, Alexandre KALIADINE Editorial Assistant Tatiana ANICHKINA Moscow 2012 УДК 327 ББК 64.4 (0) Rus 95 Rus 95 Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security / Ed. by Alexei Arbatov and Alexandre Kaliadine. – M., IMEMO RAN, 2012. – 214 pp. ISBN 978-5-9535- 0340-2 The volume provides IMEMO contributions to the Russian edition of the 2011 SIPRI Yearbook: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. The contributors address a wide range of is- sues: nuclear disarmament: solutions to the stalemate; missile de- fence: challenges and opportunities; regional BMD systems and their development; evolution of the regime established by the Bio- logical and Toxin Weapons Convention; developing the Arctic: se- curity aspects; implications of high-precision conventional weapons for international security; trends in modern space activities. This year’s edition also highlights Russian defence spending and arma- ments programmes; anti-missile debates in Russian expert commu- nity and local conflicts on the CIS territory. To view IMEMO RAN publications, please visit our website at http://www.imemo.ru ISBN 978-5-9535- 0340-2 © IMEMO RAN, 2012 CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................7 Alexander DYNKIN ACRONYMS ...................................................................................9 PART I. ANALYSES, FORECASTS, DISCUSSIONS 1. NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT: A STALEMATE OR A TIME-OUT?...............................................................................15 Alexei ARBATOV New START..............................................................................16 Strategic debates in Russia ........................................................22 Negotiations on strategic offensive arms...................................26 Is joint missile defence possible? ..............................................27 Non-strategic nuclear weapons..................................................36 New format of BMD dialogue...................................................42 2. KEY ASPECTS OF COOPERATION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND USA/NATO OVER MISSILE DEFENCE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES ....................................44 Vladimir DVORKIN Missile and nuclear threats ........................................................44 European BMD threat to Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces ........................................................................................46 Potential Russian contribution to the European BMD ..............54 The nature of cooperation..........................................................57 Integration of BMD information systems..................................59 3. EVOLUTION OF THE MTCR AND BMD: REGIONAL ASPECTS .................................................................66 Sergei OZNOBISHCHEV Major trends in the development of missile capabilities ...........66 Enforcement of the MTCR........................................................68 Regional BMD systems and their development ........................70 4 RUSSIA AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY 4. ANTI-MISSILE DEBATES: TWO TRENDS IN RUSSIAN EXPERT COMMUNITY...............................................................79 Alexandre KALIADINE Lingering strategic uncertainties ...............................................80 The most negative scenario .......................................................84 Quest for a non-confrontational alternative...............................93 5. BTWC: OUTCOMES OF THE SEVENTH REVIEW CONFERENCE..............................................................................99 Natalia KALININA Introduction ...............................................................................99 Scientific-technological developments relevant to the BTW ..............................................................................102 Compliance of the BTWC .......................................................103 Promotion of universality of the BTWC .................................105 Confidence-building measures ................................................107 Results and plans .....................................................................111 6. DEVELOPING THE ARCTIC: SECURITY ISSUES.........................................................................................116 Andrei ZAGORSKI Delimitation of the maritime boundaries.................................117 The outer limits of the continental shelf..................................119 International navigation...........................................................122 Access to mineral resources ....................................................124 Demilitarization of the Arctic..................................................125 New security challenges in the Arctic .....................................130 7. TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND THE RUSSIA–NATO DIALOGUE ............................................134 Marianna EVDOTYEVA, Dmitry CHIZHOV PART II. EXPERT INSIGHTS 8. RUSSIA: DEFENCE SPENDING AND ARMAMENTS PROGRAMMES..........................................................................145 Lyudmila PANKOVA Defence spending in 2012–2014 .............................................145 GPV–2020 ...............................................................................155 CONTENTS 5 9. LOCAL CONFLICTS ON THE CIS TERRITORY................162 Stanislaw IVANOV Moldova–Transdniestrian conflict...........................................163 Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict over Nagorny Karabakh..................................................................................168 10. HIGH-PRECISION CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY .......................................173 Tatiana ANICHKINA US high-precision weapons programmes................................174 Russia and high-precision conventional weapons...................178 Implications for international security.....................................181 Conclusions .............................................................................185 11. TRENDS IN MODERN SPACE ACTIVITIES ....................187 Natalia ROMASHKINA Classification of space systems ...............................................187 Major sectors and funding .......................................................189 Conclusions .............................................................................198 Figures .....................................................................................200 12. KEY DOCUMENTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND NATIONAL SECURITY, DEFENCE AND ARMS CONTROL (JANUARY–DECEMBER 2011)................206 Tamara FARNASOVA Legislative acts ........................................................................206 Normative acts.........................................................................209 About the contributors..................................................................212 ROSOBORONEXPORT, JSC, Company Profile........................213 Russian Council of International Affairs .....................................213 PREFACE The Institute of World Economy and International Relations presents in this volume the 12th edition of RUSSIA: ARMS CONTROL, DISARMAMENT AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY. It provides IMEMO contributions to the Russian edition of the 2011 SIPRI Yearbook: Armaments, Disarmament and International Secu- rity. By ratifying in 2011 New START (Prague Treaty) on meas- ures for the further reduction and limitation of strategic offensive arms, Russia and the United States inspired advocates of arms con- trol and cooperation in both countries, as well as in Western Europe and the rest of the world. There was a feeling that the decade of stalemate was over, and a world free of nuclear weapons became fi- nally closer. However, the cautious optimism gave way to an increasing pessimism.Russia and the USA found themselves in a stalemate over the joint European ballistic missile defence (BMD). In 2011– 2012 the discussions on this issue continued against the background of the controversy between Russia and the USA over plans to de- velop and deploy new missile defence architecture. BMD systems are integrated into a larger context of national security policies and military and political relations. The context poses significant hurdles to the cooperation on sensitive arms con- trol issues. The European BMD theme is linked to the multifaceted Russia–NATO relations and broader geopolitical and strategic sta- bility considerations. IMEMO researchers believe that mutually beneficial com- promises in the BMD area are still possible and can open the pros- pect of building a qualitatively new model of cooperation in many other sensitive areas. The contributions to this volume offer solutions to the stalemate and the resumption of a sustainable international arms control. They contain specific proposals for new format of BMD dialogue and potential Russian contribution to the joint European BMD, as well as suggestions for possible compromises over strate- gic and tactical nuclear weapons. This year’s edition reviews the evolution of the international arms control regime established by the Biological and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hezbollah's Missiles and Rockets
    JULY 2017 CSIS BRIEFS CSIS Hezbollah’s Missiles and Rockets An Overview By Shaan Shaikh and Ian Williams JULY 2018 THE ISSUE Hezbollah is the world’s most heavily armed non-state actor, with a large and diverse stockpile of unguided artillery rockets, as well as ballistic, antiair, antitank, and antiship missiles. Hezbollah views its rocket and missile arsenal as its primary deterrent against Israeli military action, while also useful for quick retaliatory strikes and longer military engagements. Hezbollah’s unguided rocket arsenal has increased significantly since the 2006 Lebanon War, and the party’s increased role in the Syrian conflict raises concerns about its acquisition of more sophisticated standoff and precision-guided missiles, whether from Syria, Iran, or Russia. This brief provides a summary of the acquisition history, capabilities, and use of these forces. CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & middle east INTERNATIONAL STUDIES program CSIS BRIEFS | WWW.CSIS.ORG | 1 ezbollah is a Lebanese political party public source information and does not cover certain topics and militant group with close ties to such as rocket strategies, evolution, or storage locations. Iran and Syria’s Assad regime. It is the This brief instead focuses on the acquisition history, world’s most heavily armed non-state capabilities, and use of these forces. actor—aptly described as “a militia trained like an army and equipped LAND ATTACK MISSILES AND ROCKETS like a state.”1 This is especially true Hwith regard to its missile and rocket forces, which Hezbollah 107 AND 122 MM KATYUSHA ROCKETS has arrayed against Israel in vast quantities. The party’s arsenal is comprised primarily of small, man- portable, unguided artillery rockets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army's New Multiple Rocket Launcher-A Shining Example of A
    The Army's New Multiple Rocket Launcher-A Shining Example of a Weapon That Works The military forces of the United States and its NATO partners have no hope nor intention of matching the Warsaw Pact gun-for-gun or tank­ for-tank. Instead we and our allies plan to rely from the onset of hostil­ ities in Europe on tactics and weapons which would blunt the initial attack and deliver a knockout blow to the Soviet second echelon forces before they could exploit any initial success. To give our Army the wherewithal to fight a numerically superior foe­ and win, we have organized and trained balanced ground fighting forces capable of successful combat against any army in the world. Of equal import, we are providing our soldiers with the weap­ ons and equipment to exhibit a credi­ ble deterrence to war-armaments like the M1 Abrams tank and its compan­ ion, the Bradley infantry fighting ve­ hicle, the AH-64 Apache attack heli­ copter and the UH -60 utility helicopter. In addition the Army is quietly field­ ing another new system that could provide the firepower edge our sol­ diers need. That weapon is the Multi­ ple Launch Rocket System (MLRS), and it is described by the general in charge of Army research and develop­ ment as "the best piece of equipment that we have fielded for close support of the battlefield since World War II." The MLRS is a highly reliable, ex­ tremely accurate field artillery rocket system with which three soldiers can deliver the volume of firepower that would normally require nearly a bat­ talion of heavy artillery.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Guide Monthly • Issue #3 (102)
    Army G uide monthly # 3 (102) March 2013 Savings Served Up for Bradley Armor Plates Tachanka Hwacha Patria Delivered 1st Batch of NextGen Armoured Wheeled Vehicles to Sweden Micro-robotics Development Furthered with ARL Contract Extension Textron Marine & Land Systems to Build 135 Additional Mobile Strike Force Vehicles Saab Acquires Ballistic Protection Technology Scale Armour Textron Awarded Contract to Produce Turrets and Provide Support for Colombia's APCs US Army Developing New 120mm AMP Tank Round Siege Engine Heavy Tank Medium Tank Tanegashima Super-Heavy Tank www.army-guide.com Army Guide Monthly • #3 (102) • March 2013 Army to change the armor tile box material from titanium to Savings Served Up for Bradley Armor aluminum for more than 800 reactive armor tile sets. Plates "They wanted to change the material for several reasons," said Peter Snedeker, a contracting officer with ACC-New Jersey. "It was easier to manufacture with aluminum rather than titanium, so there would be shorter lead times. Aluminum was also more readily available and cheaper." However, changing a contract isn't a simple matter. The change can't have a material effect on the design, nor can performance be less than what the contract requires. The aluminum must perform just as well or better than titanium to support the demands of the Soldier. When a military contractor approached the Army ACC-New Jersey's technical team performed an with a proposal for significant savings on armor extensive analysis of the change proposal and continued tiles for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the impulse to to work with General Dynamics to determine if the quickly go for the savings had to be postponed: The Bradley played such an important role in saving material switch served the form, fit and function lives that keeping a steady flow of contracts was specified in the technical data package.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Child Is the Main Mission Of
    asgardia.space DECLARATION OF UNITY OF ASGARDIA We, the free people of the first in the history of humanity Space Kingdom ASGARDIA, based on the birthright of a Human in the universe, adopt this DECLARATION • Asgardia is a free and unified Space Nation. • Asgardia participates in the global events • The objectives of Asgardia are: on Earth, similar to the Earth’s States, based – To ensure peace in space; on its membership in the respective international – To ensure equal opportunities in space for organisations. all Asgardians, currently residing on Earth, Asgardia respects, complies with the rights • Chair of Parliament Head of Nation Supreme Justice regardless of their Earthly citizenship; of citizens of the Earth’s States, and protects Lembit Opik Igor Ashurbeyli Yun Zhao – To ensure the protection of the entire Asgardia’s citizens in the exceptional nature of BEGINNING humankind. their space citizenship. • Anyone can become a citizen of Asgardia, • Asgardia has no place for political parties. On 12 October 2016, at a press conference in Paris, Igor Ashurbeyli, a distinguished conditional on assenting to the Declaration, and However, every Asgardian can freely participate aerospace scientist, visionary and philanthropist, announced the creation of Asgardia, abiding by the Constitution and the legislation in the political life on Earth. the first space nation in the history of humanity. of Asgardia. • Asgardia mirrors the Earth without reflecting • All citizens of Asgardia are equal, irrespective Earthly borders. Nevertheless, in the framework CONSTITUTION of their Earthly country of origin, residence, of Earthly laws, every Asgardian can freely live citizenship, race, nationality, gender, religion, within the borders of any Earth State.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA, UKRAINE Heavy MLRS Being Added to Russian Division and Brigades
    RUSSIA, UKRAINE Heavy MLRS Being Added to Russian Division and Brigades OE Watch Commentary: According to the Source: Yevgeniy Andreyev, Bogdan Stepovoy, and Aleksey Ramm, “Артиллерия accompanying excerpted article from Izvestia, Russian наращивает мощь: Армейские соединения усиливаются тяжелыми артсистемами motorized rifle and tank brigades and divisions will be (Artillery Is Building up its Power: Army Formations Are Being Strengthened with equipped with the Uragan-1M Multiple Launch Rocket Heavy Artillery Systems),” Izvestia Online, 14 December 2017. https://iz.ru/675176/ System (MLRS). Previous reporting on the Uragan- evgenii-andreev-bogdan-stepovoi-aleksei-ramm/artilleriia-narashchivaet-moshch 1M MLRS stated that it was capable of firing 220mm The Ministry of Defense has begun the large-scale reform of artillery units. and 300mm rockets. These rockets are stored in their Uragan-M1 multiple rocket launcher systems, Msta-M2 self-propelled guns, and firing canisters, so instead of using a crane to reload unmanned aerial vehicles are entering the inventory of the artillery regiments and each rocket into the MLRS (the practice with previous brigades. The super-high yield artillery systems – Pion and Tulpan – are being version of the Uragan), the crane simply removes the returned. There have not been such large-scale changes in the Army for more than 30 empty pod, and replace it with a fully loaded pod of the desired caliber. According to Izvestia, the Uragan- years. The artillery units will substantially expand the range of combat missions that 1M is also capable firing 122mm rockets, the same are being accomplished and they will increase effectiveness, kill range, and fire power.
    [Show full text]
  • Asgardia: Space Nation Or Pie in Sky?
    ASGARDIA: SPACE NATION OR PIE IN SKY? What is Asgardia? Asgardia is the nation-state of space, a new nation dedicated to expanding peaceful exploration of space for the benefit of humanity. It is led by Igor Ashurbeyli, chairman of UNESCO’s Science of Space Committee and founder of the Aerospace International Research Centre in Vienna. At first glance, it’s an amazing concept and surely one that every space scientist should welcome. According to its website, Asgardia will offer an independent platform, free from the constraint of a land-based country’s laws. It will become a place in orbit which is truly ‘no man’s land’”. Its first aim is to launch a satellite in October 2017, Artist's impression. Image via James Vaughan on the 60th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik. Another goal is to create a “protective shield” from threats to life on Earth, such as space debris, coronal mass ejections and asteroids. The project, announced at a press conference in Paris on October 12, 2016, is urging people to sign up to become citizens. Ashurbeyli has said that when the number of applications goes above 100,000, the organisation can officially apply to the UN for the status of state. The claims are visionary – but could they be something of a mirage? In Norse mythology, Asgard is one of the Nine Worlds of the ancient gods, ruled over by Odin. Set in the skies, it is connected to Earth by the rainbow bridge, Bifrost. In taking the name Asgardia for the new “nation state”, the founders call upon its potential citizens to create an independent world of peaceful scientific cooperation Space.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Identification Cards Russia Edition
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION CARDS RUSSIA EDITION US Army Training and Doctrine Command back card russia.indd 1 8/5/2019 6:56:46 AM DISTRIBUTION A DISTRIBUTION Worldwide Equipment Identification Cards Russia Edition LEARN MORE ABOUT TOMORROW’S BATTLES TRADOC G-2 TrainingODIN Mad Scientist Gateway TRADOC G-2 Apple Store GoogleDATE Play US Army Training and TRADOC G-2 Doctrine Command AUG 2019 AUG Bleed Area 20-17-003 GTA Final Size Safe Area Cut Line Crease Line Type: Short-Range Air Defense System Nomenclature: SA-13 Main Weapon Range: 5000m Main Weapon Main Weapon: IR Missile Type: Short-Range Air Defense System Nomenclature: SA-15 Gauntlet Main Weapon Range: 12km Main Weapon Main Weapon: RADAR Guided Missile Type: Main Battle Tank Nomenclature: T-90 Main Weapon Range: 3000m Main Weapon Main Weapon: 125mm Smoothbore Type: Main Battle Tank Nomenclature: T-80U Main Weapon Range: 3000m, 5000m Main Weapon Main Weapon: 125mm Smoothbore, Anti-Tank Guided Missiles Type: Main Battle Tank Nomenclature: T-72B3 Nomenclature: T-72B3 Main Weapon Range: 3000, 5000m Main Weapon Main Weapon: 125mm Smoothbore, Anti-Tank Guided Missiles Type: Main Battle Tank 2000, 1000m Nomenclature: T-64 Main Weapon Range: 3000, Main Weapon Main Weapon: 125mm Smoothbore, 12.7, 7.62mm Machine Guns Type: Infantry Fighting Vehicle Nomenclature: BMP-3 Main Weapon Range: 5.5km, 4000m Main Weapon Main Weapon: 100mm Gun, 30 mm Cannon Type: Infantry Fighting Vehicle Nomenclature: BMP-2 Main Weapon Range: 4000, 4000m Main Weapon Main Weapon: 30mm Cannon, AT-5 Type: Infantry
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    Viewbook of DPRK Prepared by ONN 10 October 2020 Parade 13 October 2020 This is a viewbook prepared after the 10 October 2020 DPRK military parade in celebration of the 75th anniversary of the founding of the Workers’ Party of Korea. The slides are arranged according to the order of parade, which started with tactical, anti-tank weapons and ended with very heavy, land mobile liquid propellant intercontinental ballistic missiles. 2 Parade order: • Anti-Tank Guided Missile 1 • Anti-Tank Guided Missile 2 • Wheeled Self-Propelled Gun • New Tank • Self-Propelled Howitzer • 240 mm Multiple Rocket Launcher (MRL) • KN-09 MRL • KN-25 MRL (4 tubes; wheeled chassis) • KN-25 MRL (6 tubes; tracked chassis) • New MRL • Anti-Ship Cruise Missile • Pukguksong-4 Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile • New Short-Range Air Defense System • KN-06 Air Defense Missile • Pukguksong-2 Medium-Range Ballistic Missile • Possible Land Attack Cruise Missile • KN-23 Short-Range Ballistic Missile • KN-24 Short-Range Ballistic Missile • Hwasong-12 Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile • Hwasong-15 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile • New Intercontinental Ballistic Missile - A New Strategic Weapon 3 Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) System 1 Anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) Type 1 DESIGNATION Unknown RANGE Possibly around or below 10 km VEHICLE DPRK 6 x 6 armored vehicle This is presumed to be an advanced ATGM that is possibly guided through fiber optics. In this guidance mode, the missile’s TV or infrared imaging seeker sends the image in real time through the fiber optic to the operator, who in turn steers the missile towards the target until hit.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’S Republic of China
    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2015 Office of the Secretary of Defense Preparation of this report cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $92,000 in Fiscal Years 2014-2015. This includes $3,000 in expenses and $89,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2015 April 07 RefID: D-117FA69 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2015 A Report to Congress Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 Section 1246, “Annual Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China,” of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, Public Law 111-84, which amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, Section 1202, Public Law 106-65, provides that the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report “in both classified and unclassified form, on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. The report shall address the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the People’s Liberation Army and the tenets and probable development of Chinese security strategy and military strategy, and of the military organizations and operational concepts supporting such development over the next 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond
    Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond John Gordon IV, Igor Mikolic-Torreira, D. Sean Barnett, Katharina Ley Best, Scott Boston, Dan Madden, Danielle C. Tarraf, Jordan Willcox C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2124 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9967-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Army photo by Spc. Josselyn Fuentes. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Army Fires for Army 2025, sponsored by the Field Artil- lery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma (a part of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution, the Flag, the Coat of Arms and the Anthem
    Flag of Asgardia Coat of Arms of Asgardia The final decision on the national symbols will be passed by the Parliament of Asgardia 2 CREATING A SPACE NATION On 12 October 2016, at a press conference in Paris, Igor Ashurbeyli, a distin- guished aerospace scientist, visionary and philanthropist, announced the creation of Asgardia, the first space nation in the history of humanity. It is a global, integrative project, aimed at fostering peace, providing free access to space technologies for all nations and their citizens, and protecting planet Earth from natural and man-made threats from outer space. Asgardia’s concept comprises three parts – philosophical, legal and scientific/technological Asgardia invites everyone into the future 3 PHILOSOPHY Asgardia’s philosophy began with selecting the nation’s name – Asgardia. In ancient mythology, Asgard was a country in the skies, the country of gods, the country of dreams. Asgardia’s distinction in the philosophical sense is serving all humanity and every individual regardless of their personal prosperity or the prosperity of their country of origin Asgardia’s philosophical envelope is to ‘digitalise’ the Noosphere, the mirror image of humanity in space, but without the Earthly division into states, religions and nations. In Asgardia, we are all - Earthlings! Asgardia’s motto is: One Humanity – One Unity. 4 Asgardia is a nation of free-thinking people Steve Bronstein/ Getty Images LEGALITIES Many of the problems relating to global space law remain unresolved. There is too much influence of geopolitical conflicts, rooted in the history of Earthly nations. That is why it is time to create a new judicial reality in space.
    [Show full text]
  • Asgardia' Is More Likely to Be a Pie in the Sky Than a Nation in Space 14 October 2016, by Monica Grady
    Why 'Asgardia' is more likely to be a pie in the sky than a nation in space 14 October 2016, by Monica Grady organisation can officially apply to the UN for the status of state. The claims are visionary – but could they be something of a mirage? In Norse mythology, Asgard is one of the Nine Worlds of the ancient gods, ruled over by Odin. Set in the skies, it is connected to Earth by the rainbow bridge, Bifrost. In taking the name Asgardia for the new "nation state", the founders call upon its potential citizens to create an independent world of peaceful scientific cooperation. I am not sure the mythological world of Asgard is the best model for such an aspiration: after all, the largest hall in Asgard is Valhalla, where warriors killed in battle spend their time feasting or fighting. Artist’s impression. Credit: James Vaughan More fitting perhaps are the descriptions of Asgard in the fictional Marvel universe, where it's a world that "exists in another dimensional plane and is about the size of the United States". According to I have become citizen number 62 of Asgardia, a Marvel's history, Asgard was created by the god new space nation dedicated to expanding peaceful Thor on Earth, where he had bought a huge piece exploration of space for the benefit of humanity. It of property. But Iron Man confronted Thor about his is led by Igor Ashurbeyli, chairman of UNESCO's construction, "and after a short but heated debate, Science of Space Committee and founder of the [Iron Man] proposed to Thor that Asgard would be Aerospace International Research Centre in considered a separate nation just like a foreign Vienna.
    [Show full text]