The Last Day Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Last Day Of Part of Light Night Leeds City Museum Friday 4th October 2013 Bringing the ancient world to life through the Victorian carnival FOR ONE NIGHT ONLY. Roll up! Roll up! And see the Ancient Worlds Gallery in a whole new light! More information http://carnivalofancientwonders.wordpress.com/ Roll up! Roll up! For one night only… Experience the “Last Day of Pompeii” through a series of artefacts from recent excavations presented in tableaux illuminating the sights and activities of everyday Roman life, as presented by Mr Walter Washburn, archaeologist with the German excavating team (1892-1893). 4th October 1893 The Journal and Notes of Mr Walter Washburn, kept during his visit to Italy, 1892-1893, during which time he visited Pompeii and participated in an excavation there. Vesuvius from Portici, c. 1774–1776, original in oil on canvas (40” x 51”) by the British artist Joseph Wright (1734–1797). Credit: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens, Frances Crandall Dyke Bequest. Monday 3rd October 1892 Dearest Polly, I can still hardly believe how lucky I am. It is only a week since my kind hosts in Naples introduced me to August Mau – yes, the very man who just ten years ago categorised the styles of Pompeian painting – and already he has invited me to visit his newest excavation! I am so glad that mother insisted we learn German as well as French, otherwise I could never have gained his approval by discussing details he published in the German Archaeological Institute’s Roman Mittheilungen. But I don’t need to tell you that! I do need to tell you that he has the most impressive white moustache, very distinguished – I’m half considering growing one myself... The Domus L. Albusius Celsus is the 8th house in the 2nd insula of Region 5 under Guiseppe Fiorella’s numbering system (V.2.i) - I enclose a map torn from my Baedeker Guide, with apologies and thanks to Messrs Baedeker, but shall make a more detailed version for you soon. Excavations began last season and there are only a few weeks before Mau goes to winter in Rome, although he says that, if I suit – oh,, I so hope I will – and improve my Italian, I may rejoin them in the Spring! I will take notes and sketch diligently over the next weeks and send you copies of as much as time permits, particularly the decorative schemes, as I remember how much you enjoyed them during our trip with Uncle Richard to the Pompeii Court at Crystal Palace. I am sure you will appreciate seeing these before everyone else! Your loving brother, Walter It is very strange that parts of this city are open to visitors, while others resemble a building site. These visitors dresses would never survive the gruelling work ahead of me, as it appears I will actually be expected to shift baskets of lapilli from our site! Postcard of the Forum (the main public area). Up to the present time about three-fifths of Pompeii have been excavated. In 1872 Fiorelli estimated that at the current rate of excavation the whole city would be laid bare in 74 years. Since then work has progressed more slowly, partly because greater care is being taken for the preservation of the remains. At the present we believe that the twentieth century will hardly witness completion of the excavations. Excavations made under the Direction of Inspector Giuseppe Fiorelli, in 1860, using his new method . Articles of furniture and objects of art that can easily be moved (like the statuettes often found in gardens) are usually taken to the Museum in Naples; a few things have been placed in the little Museum at Pompeii. Now and then small sculptures have been left in a house exactly as they were found; but the necessity of keeping such houses locked and of guarding them with especial care prevents wide adoption of this method of preservation. This is not a street, it is a house, still with its stone furniture in the atrium - Regio VIII Insula 4, 4, 49. Paintings have been preserved by different methods at different times. Generally, however, the best pictures have been cut from the walls and transferred to the Museum, while the decorative framework has been left undisturbed. It is regrettable that in this way the effect of the decorative system as a whole has been destroyed, for the picture forms the centre of a carefully elaborated scheme of decoration which needs to be viewed as an artistic whole in order to be fully appreciated; and the removal of a painting cannot be accomplished without damaging the parts of the wall immediately in contact with it. A far better method would be to leave intact all walls containing paintings or decorative work of interest, providing such means of protection against the weather as may be necessary – even re-roofing or reconstructing the building. A good beginning in this respect has been made in the case of the house of the Vettii (VI.15.1), the beautiful and well preserved paintings of which have been left on the walls and are preserved with the greatest of care. Although this house is now locked and under guard, which can prove troublesome for the casual visitor – I will suggest this way forward to Herr Mau should there be any paintings of quality in the Domus L. Albusius Celsus. The treatment of a mosaic floor is an altogether different problem. While the floor as a whole, with its ornamental designs, is left in place, fine mosaics representing paintings, which are delicate and easily destroyed, are wisely taken up and placed in the Museum. Photograph by Giacomo Brogi taken about twenty years ago: “5075Pompeii. Wall of the Temple of Augustus, also known as the Pantheon”, showing the roof added to protect the decorative scheme in situ. It is actually a photograph of the Macellum, which brings home to me the importance of cataloguing the finds and the site accurately for future generations. While photographs like this seem frivolous (they sell well to tourists!), the photographer assures me that do an important job of reminding people that these rooms were once occupied – by people very similar to those who live in the Naples area today - and of preserving the paintings, which are beginning to fade in the sun. You can see where a superior painting has been removed to by being cut out of the plaster! Photograph of “Edoardo in Pompei” by Wilhelm von Plueschow. Pompeians cast in plaster. Fiorelli’s new excavation method – digging down through the layers rather than tunnelling into houses, meant that he noticed voids in the volcanic material. When he poured plaster into them he discovered that these voids were moulds of things like wooden furniture and even people. When I came to Pompeii as a visitor I entered on the South-East side of the city through the Porta Marina , but today as an actual archaeologist I enter through the Nola Gate on the other side of the city in Regio IV, which is almost entirely unexcavated. From here you can see the amphitheatre, where I hope to examine some of the graffiti in the tunnels beneath. These scratches in the plaster of the walls is one of the things which helps me feel so close to the Pompeians of 1800 years ago, whose lives were cut short by the volcano. Herr Mau has told me that his house has an inscription dating from the reign of Nero – I cannot wait to see it! These are a few of my favourites from wandering around: Vici Nuceriae in alia DCCCLVS, fide bona. ’I beat Nuceria at dice: 855.5 denarii ($150 US dollars) – without cheating! Accounts from a bakery (Regio I. iii. 27) in which an as (a small bronze coin, is worth 1½d):Oleum, l[ibra], a[ssibus] IV; palea a. V; faenum a. XVI; diaria a. V; furfure a.VI; viria I a. III. Oil, 1 pound, 4 asses; straw, 5 asses; hay, 16 asses; a day's wages, 5 asses; bran, 6 asses; one wreath for the neck, 3 asses;. The discovery of bread in one of the ovens of a bakery in Pompeii, 1870. Note the applauding female onlooker – Polly, I wish you were here to see Pompeii too… Walter Washburn, Esq., in Pompeii. October 1892. I asked Wilhelm von Plueschow if he would take a picture of me in the Forum Triangulare. Here it is. You will be pleased, Polly, that I did not succumb to his kind offer of wearing one of his togas! View of the Forum Triangulare, looking toward Vesuvius, which is smoking today…. On the left, are the remains of the Doric temple and of the altars with a well house in front; on the right, is the exterior of the large theatre. Interior of the amphitheatre, looking west with a transverse section of the amphitheatre, showing the tunnels under the seating where lots of graffiti can be found; much of it concerning gladiators and not all of it yet recorded. "O Campani [inhabitants of a neighborhood – vicus -- in Pompeii], you perished together with the Nucerians in that victory." This refers to the riot in the amphitheatre in 59 AD and was published by Champfleury in his Histoire de las Caricature Antique in 1866. Scratched into the podium of a tomb in the necropolis outside the Nucerian Gate (the Gate nearest the amphitheatre) is this graffito of two Thracian gladiators. Marcus Attilius (left) and Lucius Raecius Felix (right). The numbers after their names give their form.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Background The present study concerns materials used for Pompeian wall paintings.1 In focus are plasters of the early period, related to the Samnite period and the so called First style. My earlier experiences the field of ancient materials were studies of Roman plasters at the Villa of Livia at Prima Porta and fragments of wall decorations from the demolished buildings underneath the church San Lorenzo in Lucina in Rome. These studies led to the hypothesis that technology reflects not only the natural (geographical) resources available but also the ambitions within a society, a moment in time, and the economic potential of the commissioner.2 Later, during two years within the Swedish archaeological project at Pompeii, it was my task to study the plasters used in one of the houses of insula V 1, an experience that led to the perception that specific characteristics are linked to plasters used over time. In the period 2003-2005, funding by the Swedish Research Council made possible to test the hypotheses. The present method was developed at insula I 9 and the Forum of Pompeii with the approval of the Soprintendenza archeological di Pompei and in collaboration with the directors of two international archaeological teams.3 It became evident that plaster’s composition changes over time, and eight groups of chronologically pertinent plasters were identified and defined A-H. Based on these results, I assume there is a connection between the typology and the relative chronology in which the plasters appear on the walls. I also believe these factors are related not only in single buildings or quarters but over the site and that, hypothetically, the variations observed are related to technology, craftsmanship and fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • D003: Wall Painting Techniques 1 Introduction Pompeii And
    D003: Wall painting techniques Introduction Pompeii and Herculaneum have been described as towns frozen in time. Houses and villas with their furniture, food, people, jewellery and pets have been preserved. Organic materials were better preserved at Herculaneum as carbonised materials (see the wine shop figure 1) because of the pyroclastic surges. Figure 1: Wine shop at Herculaneum showing gallery and amphorae Our knowledge has been enhanced by more systematic and scientific excavations in recent years. One thing that strikes all visitors to Pompeii and Herculaneum is the amount of colour on the walls of the buildings. It is perhaps the most obvious feature of Roman art. Roman fresco techniques Many of the wall paintings or frescos adorned walls not just inside rich villas, but also inside private houses and public buildings. Depending on the function of the room, walls might be painted with imaginary architecture, still life, mythological scenes, or purely decorative motifs. Many of these motifs were derived from pattern books carried by the artists. So despite the lack of physical evidence of other forms, it is reasonable to assume that many other art objects would have shown subjects similar to those found on the painted walls. Why is the wall art or fresco painting so important? 1 D003: Wall painting techniques Can fresco painting tell us anything about the development of art in the Ancient Roman Period? How did they paint in fresco? It is clear the ancient Romans decorated the interior walls of their houses with paintings executed on wet plaster, a technique known as fresco (meaning on fresh plaster).
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Pompeii Author(S): Elizabeth Lyding Will Source: Archaeology, Vol
    Wfomen in Pompeii by Elizabeth Lyding Will year 1979 marks the 1900th anniversary of the fatefulburial of Pompeii, Her- The culaneum and the other sitesengulfed by the explosion of Mount Vesuvius in a.d. 79. It was the most devastatingdisaster in the Mediterranean area since the volcano on Thera erupted one and a half millenniaearlier. The suddenness of the A well-bornPompeian woman drawn from the original wall in theHouse Ariadne PierreGusman volcanic almost froze the bus- painting of by onslaught instantly ( 1862-1941), a Frenchartist and arthistorian. Many tling Roman cityof Pompeii, creating a veritable Pompeianwomen were successful in business, including time capsule. For centuriesarchaeologists have thosefrom wealthy families and freedwomen. exploited the Vesuvius disaster,revealing detailed evidence about the last hours of the town and its doomed inhabitants.Excavation has also uncov- ered factsabout the lives of Pompieans in happier evidence about the female membersof society.It times,when the rich soil on the slopes of Mount is an importantsource of information,in fact, Vesuvius yielded abundant harvestsof grapes, about the women of antiquityin general. Yet ar- olives, fruitsand vegetables. In those days, a vol- chaeology is a source that has gone largelyuntap- canic holocaust had seemed an impossibility.After ped. Studies of the women of ancient timeshave all, Pompeii had flourishedsafely for six hundred tended to draw theirevidence fromliterature, years,basking in the sun of southern Italy. Within even though the remarksabout women in ancient three days, however,the entire citywas buried by literatureare few in number and often lack objec- volcanic ash. Eventuallyeven its verylocation was tivity.Since Pompeii provides more archaeological forgotten.As layersof rich soil accumulated over evidence about women than most other ancient the site,what had been a thrivingcity became fer- sites except Rome itself,the failureto come to tile countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History
    ANCIENT HISTORY Paintings, mosaics and beyond The diverse range of Pompeian art offers historians a glimpse into an artistic style that was thought to have been lost, along with Pompeii as a result of the eruption in 79AD. Graffiti, pottery, mosaic and wall paintings were all part of the vast artistic culture that engulfed Pompeii. Although graffiti and pottery were present, they are not the two most significant artistic styles in Pompeii. They give valuable insight into the every day lives of Pompeian’s, and express the cultural values of the time. They are not however, what the Pompeian’s wanted to surround themselves with. Large scale mosaics and wall paintings are found in almost every private and public home or building in Pompeii. It is estimated that there is 3200 in total (according to Mau). This reveals that the subject matter of each painting and mosaic is culturally and aesthetically significant. Pottery and Graffiti was produced on a smaller scale, where as the evolution of artistic style found in paintings and mosaic show a region developing its artistic skill and expressive form. While both pottery and graffiti are important aspects of Pompeii, they do not showcase the perpetual movement of this ancient culture as painting and mosaic capture unarguably. Framed canvases hung on empty walls is an artistic feature seldom found in Pompeii. Instead artwork was painted directly onto the “moist stucco1” (source 1.1) using watercolour in a fresco2 stylistic practice. To prepare a wall, one (sometimes multiple) layer of sand mortar was used which was followed by “one or more coats of marble stucco” (source 1.2).
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation of Wall Paintings
    The Conservation of Wall Paintings The Conservation of Wall Paintings Proceedings of a symposium organized by the Courtauld Institute of Art and the Getty Conservation Institute, London, July 13-16, 1987 Sharon Cather, Editor THE GETTY CONSERVATION INSTITUTE Cover: Masaccio and Filippino Lippi. Detail of The Raising of the Son of Theophilus and The Chairing of Saint Peter, after conservation. Brancacci Chapel, Santa Maria del Carmine, Florence. (Photo: A. Quattrone) Note: Manufacturers' materials data and safety sheets should be consulted and any necessary precautions applied in the use of any materials referred to in this volume. Publication Coordinator: Irina Averkieff, GCI Editing: Andrea Belloli and Irina Averkieff Technical Drawing: Janet Spehar Enriquez Cover Design: Marquita Takei, Los Angeles, California Text Design: Marquita Takei and Jacki Gallagher (GCI) Typography: Adobe Garamond Printing: Tien Wah Press, Ltd. © 1991 The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in Singapore Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data The Conservation of wall paintings: proceedings of a symposium organized by the Courtauld Institute of Art and the Getty Conservation Institute, London, July 13-16, 1987 / Sharon Cather, editor. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-162-X (pbk.) 1. Mural painting and decoration--Conservation and restoration- -Congresses. I. Cather, Sharon. II. Courtauld Institute of Art. III. Getty Conservation Institute. ND2552.C64 1991 751.6'2--dc20 91-16526 CIP Second printing 1996. THE GETTY CONSERVATION INSTITUTE The Getty Conservation Institute, an operating organization of the J. Paul Getty Trust, was created in 1982 to address the con- servation needs of our cultural heritage. The Institute conducts world-wide, interdisciplinary, professional programs in scientific research, training, and documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing the Domus: Enhancing the History, Theory and Practice of Contemporary Interior Design Through Analysis of Ancient Roman Domestic Space(S)
    Designing the Domus: enhancing the history, theory and practice of contemporary interior design through analysis of ancient Roman domestic space(s) A Thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the School of Architecture and Interior Design of the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning 2011 by Helen A. Turner BSHCS in Interior Architecture, Ohio University, 2005 Committee Chair: Patrick Snadon, PhD – Architecture and Interior Design Committee Members: Edson Cabalfin – Architecture and Interior Design Adrian Parr, PhD – Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Advisor: Steven Ellis, PhD – Classics ABSTRACT ______________________________________ Designing the Domus: enhancing the history, theory and practice of contemporary interior design through analysis of ancient Roman domestic space(s) This thesis attempts to enhance the connection between interior design and ancient Roman domestic space by establishing a continuous, reflective and reciprocal relationship, through which their similarities might be strengthened and incongruities mutually illuminating. Though the topics of contemporary interior design and ancient Roman domestic decoration may seem disparate, the information presented throughout this thesis indicates they are, in fact, contingent. What is more, exploring them simultaneously is imperative to enriching, not only the history and theory of interior design but also augmenting the knowledge concerning ancient Roman domestic space as a holistic environment. When experiencing an ancient Roman domestic interior, it becomes very apparent that all aspects of decoration, including walls, floors, ceilings and even furniture, coalesce to evoke the sense of a ‘coordinated interior’, or a space in which all design elements work in harmony and correspondence with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • I from Treasure Hunting to Archaeological Dig. History of the Excavations of Herculaneum and Pompeii
    I From Treasure Hunting to Archaeological Dig. History of the Excavations of Herculaneum and Pompeii In Antiquity, the region at the foot of Vesuvius was renowned for its healthy climate, fertility and beauty. There were good ports in ancient Herculaneum and Pompeii, and navigable rivers flanked Pompeii. The area was rather densely inhabited by people living in farmsteads, villages and small cities. Pompeii, Herculaneum and Stabiae, lying around Vesuvius, were to be singled out in history because of their unhappy fortune in A.D. 79, not thanks to specific features that placed the towns above other average settlements in the Roman world. Undoubtedly, many eruptions had happened before – some of them are also known from stratigraphic excavations – but Vesuvius seemed dead, or had been sleeping for ages, when it exploded in 79.3 This eruption was so powerful that the fill of the wide caldara – which looked like a plain top next to the ridge of Monte Somma – was blown up, crumbled by the heat and the gases coming from inside the earth. Thanks to a long description of the event in two letters by the younger Pliny, seventeen years old at the time, written some twenty years later to his friend, the historian Tacitus, volcanologists are able to reconstruct the event. Many people were able to save themselves, but a great number died on this day of hell.4 The small towns had no particular importance within the Roman Empire. They are barely mentioned in the written sources we possess,5 and many questions remain open: when were they founded and who were their first inhabitants? How did they develop? Herculaneum was said to have been founded by Hercules; the other places do not have a foundation myth, but the same Hercules would also be the founder of Pompeii.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GREAT POMPEIAN BROTHEL-GAP Eminent Victorians
    N Chapter Seven M THE GREAT POMPEIAN BROTHEL-GAP eminent victorians he story of brothel-identi‹cation is an interesting one, worth at least a Tmodest amount of attention. Unfortunately, the critical waters have been muddied by charges of “Victorianism,” which allegedly amounts to an overea- gerness to identify a location as a brothel on the basis of its erotic art.1 This strain of criticism, most prominent in a recent book by John DeFelice Jr., amounts to a crudely reductive version of Michel Foucault’s famous “repres- sive hypothesis,” which revealed the nineteenth century to be paradoxically a fertile source of discourse about sexuality.2 Indeed, given the trend in revi- sionist history on the Victorian period that has been dominant since 1970, DeFelice and the others are in danger of paying the Victorians a compliment that they do not deserve.3 1. Cf. the accusation of “nineteenth-century racial theory” raised recently in regard to the issue of Pompeii’s ethnic composition: Allison, “Placing Individuals” (2001) 70. 2. DeFelice, Roman Hospitality (2001) 7, in a published version of a doctoral dissertation that makes a similar point: Women of Pompeian Inns (1998). The other examples of this strain of criti- cism devote far less space to it: see Jacobelli, Terme Suburbane (1995) 65 n. 119; Clarke, Looking at Lovemaking (1998) 179, with the comments of Anderson, review of Looking at Lovemaking (1998). For the repressive hypothesis, see Foucault, History of Sexuality 1 (1978) esp. 15–49. Sup- porting evidence for Foucault’s thesis is found, for example, in the enthusiasm of the popular press for the subject of brothels in nineteenth-century St.
    [Show full text]
  • Pompeii & Herculaneum
    POMPEII & HERCULANEUM CENTRALANTIKVARIATET CATALOGUE 73 Centralantikvariatet Catalogue 73 { 67 } { 58 } { 41 } 5 1. (ATKINS, Lucy Sarah Wilson.) 2. BA R BAULT, Jean. Relics of antiquity, exhibited in the ruines of Pompeii and Les plus beaux monuments de Rome ancienne. Ou recueil des Herculaneum, with an account of the destruction and recovery of plus beaux morceaux de l’antiquité romaine qui existent encore: those celebrated cities. By the author of “Fruits of Enterprise.” Com- Dessinés par monsieur Barbault peintre, ancien pensionnaire du roy piled from authentic sources; and intended for young persons. à Rome, et gravés en 128 planches avec leur explication. London, J. Harris, (1819). 12mo. Engr. front. + (2), + ix, + (blank), + 143 Rome, l’imprimerie de Komarek, 1761. Imperial folio (489 x 375 pp. + 5 plates, each with two engr. vignettes. Minor foxing, some mm). viii, + 90 pp. + 73 engr. plates (with 117 illustrations), and with 11 browning to the plates. Contemporary red rebacked gilt half mo- engr. vignettes in the text. Bound together with 51 extra engr. plates rocco binding, marbled boards. Joints repaired. Owner’s signature (mounted on 26 leaves), of which one is folding. Contemporary half of William Gage Blake. sek 2500:– calf, richly gilt spine with raised bands and green label, red morocco Garcia 980 gives the imprint 1819, otherwise it is often given as 1825. imitation paper boards. Wear to upper joints. From the library of the First edition of this fine and ambitious account of Pompeii and Hercu- Swedish artist Carl G. Fehrman, with his discret black library stamp laneum, intended for children. Among other things it includes a long on the title leaf.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Dimensions in Roman Wall Painting and the Interplay of Enclosing and Enclosed Space: a New Perspective on Second Style
    arts Article Spatial Dimensions in Roman Wall Painting and the Interplay of Enclosing and Enclosed Space: A New Perspective on Second Style Nikolaus Dietrich Institut für Klassische Archäologie, Universität Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany; [email protected] Received: 25 March 2019; Accepted: 20 May 2019; Published: 30 May 2019 Abstract: This article engages with the interplay of two-dimensional and three-dimensional wall decoration in Roman wall decoration of the so-called four Pompeian styles. Instead of describing the rapid changes in the use (or non-use) of techniques for creating perspectival depth in August Mau’s four styles within an autonomous development of decorative principles, either favoring surface over depth, or vice versa, this article will discuss the imaginary space/surface on the walls in relation to the ‘real’ space enclosed by the decorated walls and—foremost—their inhabitants as the actual referent of the decoration. The discussion will focus on second-style wall decoration, with glimpses on the earlier first and later third and fourth styles in a final section. Keywords: Roman wall painting; second pompeian style; depiction of space; Roman Perspective; decoration of the Roman house 1. Introduction The development of Roman wall painting is often described as a succession of styles that attempts either at closing or at opening up the surface of the wall. While first style decorations are themselves imitating a wall, this wall is more and more breached through by perspectival vistas in the second style. Towards the third style, however, there is again a preference for closed walls, while this trend is once more inverted in the fourth style, when perspectival vistas enter the decorative repertoire again.1 1 Any textbook on Roman wall painting may exemplify this.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes Towards the Past in Antiquity. Creating Identities
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS STOCKHOLMIENSIS Stockholm Studies in Classical Archaeology 14 Attitudes towards the Past in Antiquity. Creating Identities Proceedings of an International Conference held at Stockholm University, 15–17 May 2009 edited by Brita Alroth and Charlotte Scheffer ACTA UNIVERSITATIS STOCKHOLMIENSIS Stockholm Studies in Classical Archaeology 14 Attitudes towards the Past in Antiquity Creating Identities Proceedings of an International Conference held at Stockholm University, 15–17 May 2009 edited by Brita Alroth and Charlotte Scheffer Stockholm 2014 ACTA UNIVERSITATIS STOCKHOLMIENSIS Stockholm Studies in Classical Archaeology 14 Editor: Arja Karivieri Institutionen för arkeologi och antikens kultur SE-106 91 STOCKHOLM The English text was revised by Dr. Janet Fairweather Published with the aid of grants from Professor Birgitta Bergquist’s Fond, Granholms Stiftelse and Gösta and Marie-Louise Säflund Foundations Abstract Brita Alroth & Charlotte Scheffer (eds.) Attitudes towards the past in Antiquity. Creating identities. Proceedings of a Conference held at Stockholm University 15–17 May 2009. Stockholm Studies in Classical Archaeology, 14. Stockholm 2014, 325 pp., 129 figs. and 6 tables in the text. ISBN 978-91- 87235-48-1. This volume brings together twenty-eight papers from an International conference on attitudes towards the past and the creating of identities in Antiquity. The volume addresses many different approaches to these issues, spanning over many centuries, ranging in time from the Prehistoric periods to the Late Antiquity, and covering large areas, from Britain to Greece and Italy and to Asia Minor and Cyprus. The papers deal with several important problems, such as the use of tradition and memory in shaping an individual or a collective identity, continuity and/or change and the efforts to connect the past with the present.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imagery of Roman Identity in Augustan Rome by Jennifer
    The Imagery of Roman Identity in Augustan Rome by Jennifer Antonia-Marie Selman Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2018 © Copyright by Jennifer Selman, 2018 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ............................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2. Uncovering Roman Identity ...................................................................... 11 2.1 Journey to Romanization ......................................................................................... 11 2.2 Negotiating Identity in the Metamorphoses ............................................................ 29 2.3 Ekphrasis and Roman identity ................................................................................ 40 CHAPTER 3. Building Roman Identity ........................................................................... 42 3.1 Non-Elite Self-Representation ................................................................................ 43 3.1.1 Election Notice ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]