Fresno Resources
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mitigated Negative Declaration Parlier 1, 2, 3 – TCP Removal Treatment Systems
PREPARED FOR: MITIGATED NEGATIVE City of Parlier 1100 E. Parlier Avenue Parlier, CA 93648 DECLARATION PREPARED BY: Parlier 1, 2, 3 - TCP Removal Treatment Systems Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 113 N. Church Street, Suite 302 March 2019 Visalia, CA 93291 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Parlier 1, 2, 3 – TCP Removal Treatment Systems Prepared for: City of Parlier 1100 E. Parlier Avenue Parlier, CA 93648 Contact: Antonio Gastelum, City Manager (559) 646-3545 Prepared by: Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 113 N. Church Street, Suite 302 Visalia, CA 93291 Contact: Travis Crawford, AICP (559) 840-4414 March 2019 Project Reference No. 026-1804 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Summary 1-1 1.2 Document Format 1-1 CHAPTER TWO – PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Location 2-1 2.2 Setting and Surrounding Land Uses 2-1 2.3 Project Background 2-2 2.4 Project Description 2-7 2.5 Objectives 2-10 2.6 Other Required Approvals 2-10 CHAPTER THREE – INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 3-1 CHAPTER FOUR - MMRP 4-1 CHAPTER FIVE – PREPARERS 5-1 LIST OF FIGURES 1 – Regional Location Map 2-3 2 – First Component Location 2-4 3 – Second Component Location 2-5 4 – Third Component Location 2-6 5 – Component 1 Details 2-8 6 – Component 2 Details 2-9 LIST OF TABLES 1 – SJVAPCD Regulation VIII Control Measures 3-12 2 – Annual Significance Thresholds 3-15 3 – Proposed Project Construction and Operation Emissions 3-16 4 – Screening Levels for Potential Odor Sources 3-17 5 –Existing TCP Levels 3-49 6 – Typical Construction Vibration Levels 3-56 APPENDICES (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) A- CalEEMod Output Files B- Biological Evaluation Report C- Cultural Resources Inventory Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION Parlier 1, 2, 3 – TCP Removal Treatment Systems | Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Summary This document is the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration describing the potential environmental effects of implementing a series of improvements to the City of Parlier’s well and water system to remove 1, 2, 3 – Trichloropropane (TCP) from the City’s water. -
Agenda Item – Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND COMMISSIONERS FROM: JEFFREY O’NEAL, AICP, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: APPLICATION NO. 20-23, THE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS, LLC COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PROJECT DATE: DECEMBER 29, 2020 ISSUE In the matter of Application No. 20-23, the Valley Agricultural Holdings LLC project, shall the Planning Commission: 1. Make a determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, make a determination of General Plan consistency for the disposal of real property, and approve a conditional use permit; and 2. Make recommendations to the City Council regarding a general plan amendment, rezone, and development agreement? BACKGROUND The State of California’s Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) is the primary statute that regulates personal, medicinal, and commercial cannabis activity in the state. In addition to MAUCRSA, Chapters 8.37 (Commercial Cannabis Businesses) and 17.99 (Commercial Cannabis Overly District) of the Mendota Municipal Code (MMC) provide regulations applicable to non-personal cannabis activities at the local level. Pursuant to these local regulations, an applicant wishing to undertake commercial cannabis activities must meet certain location criteria, receive approval of a conditional use permit, and enter into a development agreement with the City. Dating to early 2019, the City has been in discussions with various entities regarding development of a commercial cannabis facility on a portion of a City-owned parcel (APN 013-030-68ST) adjacent to the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In October 2019, the City entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC. On October 13, 2020 the Planning Department received an application from Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC requesting a variety of entitlements and actions to facilitate the construction and operation of a commercial cannabis facility as discussed. -
Distribution List
table of contents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Distribution List Distribution List The lists that follow show tribes, federal, state, and local government agencies, elected officials, and libraries who were on the mailing list to receive the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision as of December 11, 2000. In November 2000 the 15,000 people and organizations on the Sierra Nevada Framework Project mailing list were sent a return postcard by which they could request a copy of the Final EIS. As of December 11, 2000 the Forest Service had received approximately 1300 requests. FEIS Volume 1, Distribution List Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Distribution List California and Nevada Tribes Rancheria (Tribe) Local Office Name Last Name First Name Title Big Sandy Rancheria Baty Loren Chairman BIA Office Western Nevada Field Office Hunter Robert L Chairman Cedarville Rancheria Northern California Agency Lash Virginia Chairperson Choinumni Choinumni Tribe Alec Stanley Chairman Eel River Blue Lake Rancheria Brundin Claudia Chairperson Maidu Chico Rancheria Ward Arlene Chairperson Maidu Enterprise Rancheria Angle Harvey Chairman Maidu Greenville Rancheria Timmons Angela Chairman Maidu Maidu Nation Lecompte Clara Chairperson Maidu Mooretown Rancheria Pursia Shirley Chairperson Me-Wuk Tuolumne Me-Wuk Rancheria Kevin Day Sonny Chairman Miwok Buena Vista Rancheria Potts Donna Marie Spokesperson Miwok Calaveras Band of Miwok Indians Jeff Virginia Spokesperson Miwok Ione Band of Miwok -
In the Recent Dear Colleague Letter 99-30, OCSE Notified You of A
Location Codes Workgroup FIPS Coding Scheme Recommendation Summary Position 1 Position 2 Positions 3-5 Interstate Case FIPS State Identifier County/Functional Entity 9 0 BIA Tribe Identifier Tribal Case (Federally recognized) 8 0 ISO Country Identifier International Case Exception 0-9, A-Z (Canada – sub- jurisdiction) Tribal and International Case Location Codes 1 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal locator codes coding scheme Tribal Case Locator Codes • Classification code - 9 in position 1 • “0”(zero) in position 2 • Tribe Identification - BIA code in positions 3-5 Example: Chickasaw Nation 90906 • Addresses for tribal grantees– provided by tribes to IRG staff List of current tribal grantees: http://ocse.acf.hhs.gov/int/directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.tribalivd • Link to tribal government addresses web site: http://www.doi.gov/leaders.pdf 11/15/2006 2 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal Identification Codes Code Name 001 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina 006 Onondaga Nation of New York 007 St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York 008 Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of New York 009 Tuscarora Nation of New York 011 Oneida Nation of New York 012 Seneca Nation of New York 013 Cayuga Nation of New York 014 Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine 018 Penobscot Tribe of Maine 019 Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians of Maine 020 Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut 021 Seminole Tribe of Florida, Dania, Big Cypress, Brighton, Hollywood & Tampa Reservations 026 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 027 Narragansett -
Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16. -
Mitigated Negative Declaration Signal Installation Project at Shepherd and Minnewawa Avenues
MITIGATED NEGATIVE PREPARED FOR: DECLARATION Traffic Signal Installation Project City of Clovis 1033 Fifth Street at Shepherd and Minnewawa Clovis, CA 93612 PREPARED BY: Avenues Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 113 N. Church Street, Suite 302 December 2018 Visalia, CA 93291 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Signal Installation Project at Shepherd and Minnewawa Avenues Project Number: CIP13-02 Federal ID Number: CML5208 (128) Prepared for: City of Clovis 1033 Fifth Street Clovis, CA 93612 (559) 324-2336 Contact: Ryan Burnett Prepared by: Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 113 N. Church Street, Suite 302 Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 840-4414 Contact: Travis Crawford, AICP December 2018 Project Reference No. 028 - 1801 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Summary 1-1 1.2 Document Format 1-1 CHAPTER TWO – PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Background 2-1 2.2 Project Location 2-1 2.3 Setting and Existing Conditions 2-1 2.4 Project Description 2-5 2.5 Other Required Approvals 2-5 CHAPTER THREE – INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 3.1 Environmental Checklist Form 3-1 3.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 3-3 3.3 Determination 3-3 I. Aesthetics 3-5 II. Agricultural and Forest Resources 3-8 III. Air Quality 3-11 IV. Biological Resources 3-16 V. Cultural Resources 3-22 VI. Geology and Soils 3-26 VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3-30 VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3-33 IX. Hydrology 3-38 X. Land Use and Planning 3-44 XI. Mineral Resources 3-46 XII. Noise 3-47 XIII. Population and Housing 3-51 XIV. -
List of Exhibits to Complaint Big Sandy Rancheria Of
Case 1:11-cv-00198-OWW -GSA Document 1-1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 40 List of Exhibits to Complaint Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians, et al. v. Brownstone, LLC Exhibit lition Date A Constitution of the Big Sandy Band of Western Mono Indians February 21, 2000 B 2004 Approval of the Constitution of the Big Sandy Band of April 1, 2004 Western Mono Indians by BIA/Dept. of the Interior C 2005 Amendment to the Constitution of the Big Sandy Band of March 28, 2005 Western Mono Indians D Tribal Resolution Creating the Big Sandy Rancheria August 20, 2004 Entertainment Authority E Tribal State Gaming Compact Between the Big Sandy Band of September 10, 1999 Western Mono Indians and the State of California F Approval of Tribal State Gaming Compact by Dept. of the May 5, 2000 Interior G Big Sandy Rancheria Tribal Gaming Ordinance May 1, 2002 H Big Sandy Rancheria Tribal Gaming Regulations May 1, 2002 I NIGC Letter Approving Tribal Gaming Ordinance & Regulations November 27, 2002 J Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between Tribe and January 16, 2007 Brownstone K Development Agreement Between Tribe and Brownstone March 25, 2007 L Credit Agreement Between Tribe and Brownstone March 25, 2007 M Letter from Gaming Commission to Brownstone December 10, 2009 N Letter from Brownstone to Gaming Commission January 21, 2010 0 Letter from Gaming Commission to Brownstone February 9, 2010 P Letter from Tribal Council to Brownstone February 11, 2010 Q Letter from Gaming Commission to NIGC March 9, 2010 Case 1:11-cv-00198-OWW -GSA Document 1-1 Filed 02/03/11 -
California-Nevada Region
Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives California Nevada Introduction Page Introduction Page Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Beginning of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the U.S. Government and the Kahwea, San Luis Rey, and Cocomcahra Indians. Signed at the Village of Temecula, California, 1/5/1852. National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/55030733 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities California Native Communities To perform a search of more general records of California’s Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog, use Advanced Search. Enter California in the search box and 75 in the Record Group box (Bureau of Indian Affairs). There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of California, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites. Type California into the main search box for both. Related state agencies and universities may also hold records or information about these communities. Examples might include the California State Archives, the Online Archive of California, and the University of California Santa Barbara Native American Collections. Historic California Native Communities Federally Recognized Native Communities in California (2018) Sample Document Map of Selected Site for Indian Reservation in Mendocino County, California, 7/30/1856. National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/50926106 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic California Native Communities For a map of historic language areas in California, see Native Languages. -
Reedley College Center for Fine and Performing Arts Project (State Clearinghouse No
California Environmental Quality Act Initial Study Reedley College Center for Fine and Performing Arts Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2019069080) Reedley, California Lead Agency and Project Sponsor: State Center Community College District 1171 Fulton Street Fresno, CA 93721 Contact: George Cummings, District Director of Facilities Planning Phone: (559) 243-7191 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: ODELL Planning &Research, Inc. 49346 Road 426, Suite 2 Oakhurst, California 93644 (559) 472-7167 www.odellplanning.com November 2020 State Center Community College District Reedley College Center for Fine and Performing Arts Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 A. Project Background Information 6 1. Project Title, Lead Agency, and Lead Agency Contact Information 6 2. Project Location 6 3. Project Setting 9 4. Project Description 12 5. Actions Required to Implement Project 15 6. Request for Preliminary Comment 15 7. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required 15 B. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 16 C. Determination 16 D. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 17 1. State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G: Environmental Checklist Form 17 2. Existing Laws, Regulations, Policies, and Mitigation Measures 17 E. Environmental Checklist 19 1. Aesthetics 19 2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources 21 3. Air Quality 23 4. Biological Resources 29 5. Cultural Resources 32 6. Energy 34 7. Geology and Soils 35 8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 38 9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 39 10. Hydrology and Water Quality 42 11. Land Use and Planning 45 12. Mineral Resources 46 13. Noise 46 14. Population and Housing 51 15. Public Services 52 16. Recreation 52 17. Transportation 53 18. Tribal Cultural Resources 58 19. -
Cultural Resources Report for the 31.27 Acre
Cultural Resources Assessment APPENDIX C A Cultural Resources Survey of 31.27 Acres 495-22-011 Clovis, CA Prepared For: Don Pickett and Associates, Inc Prepared by Robert Pennell, Tribal Cultural Resources Director, Cristina Gonzales, Assistant Director/Museum Registrar Sara Lane Barnett, Cultural Resources Assistant Venessa Jimenez, Cultural Resources Assistant Ngoc Thuy Kirby, GIS Specialist Table Mountain Rancheria, January 2020 Topographic Quadrangle: Clovis, Calif., 7.5' (2019) (Keywords: Fresno County, Dog Creek, Fancher Creek, Gashowu (Cover photo: Original Tarpey Depot photo 1915) Table of Contents List of Figures ii Management Summary 1 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Regulatory Context 2 3.0 Setting 3 3.1 Biological Setting 3 3.2 Ethnography and Ethnohistory 3 3.3 Post Conttact History 6 4.0 Record Search 8 5.0 Field Methods 8 6.0 Evaluations and Recommendations 9 References Cited 10 Appendix A Record Search CONFIDENTIAL i List of Figures Figure 1 Fresno County Figure 2 Google Earth Aerial Image 2018 Figure 3 USGS Clovis Topo Map, 2019 Figure 4 Business Development Plans Figure 5 General Land Office Map, 1854 Figure 6 USGS Clovis Topo Map, 1923 ii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY On October 31st 2019, the Table Mountain Cultural Resources Department conducted a cultural resources inventory on the Don Pickett and Associates, Inc. Clovis Avenue and Dakota Avenue properties in Fresno County (Figure 1). The survey area covered 31.27 acres on parcels 495-22-011 owned by Don Pickett and Associates, Inc., the developer (Figure 2). The study area is located at the south west corner of Clovis Avenue and Dakota Avenue in the City of Clovis, California (Figure 3). -
Tribal CCDF Contacts by State: May 2021
National Center on Tribal Tribal CCDF Contacts Early Childhood Development By State ALABAMA Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska Poarch Band of Creek Indians 9097 Glacier Hwy 5811 Jack Springs Road Juneau, Alaska 99801-9983 Atmore, Alabama 36502 Phone: 907-463-7117 Phone: 251-368-9136 Chilkat Indian Village (Klukwan) PO Box 210 ALASKA Haines, Alaska 99827 Phone: 907-767-5517 Agdaagux Tribal Council P.O. Box 249 Chugachmiut King Cove, Alaska 99612 1840 Bragaw Street, Suite 110 Phone: 907-497-2648 Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Phone: 907-334-0131 Akiachak Native Community P.O. Box 51070 Cook Inlet Tribal Council Akiachak, Alaska 99551 3600 San Jeronimo Drive #3296 Phone: 907-825-4626 Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Phone: 907-793-3323 Akiak Native Community P.O. Box 52127 Copper River Native Association Akiak, Alaska 99552 PO Box H Phone: 907-765-7112 Mile 104 Richardson Hwy Copper Center, Alaska 99573 Aleutian/Pribilof Island Association Phone: 907-822-8840 1131 East International Airport Road Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Hoonah Indian Association Phone: 907-276-2700 318 Hill Street, P.O. Box 602 Hoonah, Alaska 99829 Arctic Slope Native Association Phone: 907-945-3545 P.O. Box 1232 Barrow, Alaska 99723 Kawerak Phone: 907-852-9376 PO Box 948 157 Seppala Drive Asa'carsarmiut Tribal Council Nome, Alaska 99762 P.O. Box 32249 Phone: 907-443-5231 Mountain Village, Alaska 99632 Phone: 907-591-2814 Kenaitze Indian Tribe P.O. Box 988 Association of Village Council Presidents Kenai, Alaska 99611 PO Box 219 Phone: 907-335-7256 101 Main Street Bethel, Alaska 99559 Knik Tribal Council Phone: 907-543-7434 PO Box 871565, 951 E. -
INTERIOR BOARD of INDIAN APPEALS Big Sandy Rancheria
INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS Big Sandy Rancheria Band of Western Mono Indians v. Acting Pacific Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs 64 IBIA 302 (08/10/2017) Related Board cases: 61 IBIA 311 62 IBIA 202 United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS 801 NORTH QUINCY STREET SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, VA 22203 BIG SANDY RANCHERIA BAND OF ) Order Affirming Decision in Part, WESTERN MONO INDIANS, ) Vacating in Part, and Remanding Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Docket No. IBIA 16-006 ACTING PACIFIC REGIONAL ) DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN ) AFFAIRS, ) Appellee. ) August 10, 2017 Big Sandy Rancheria Band of Western Mono Indians (Appellant or BSR) appealed to the Board of Indian Appeals (Board) from a September 3, 2015, decision (Decision) of the Acting Pacific Regional Director (Regional Director), Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), to accept, in trust for the Table Mountain Rancheria (Tribe or Table Mountain), 8 parcels of land encompassing approximately 147 acres located in Fresno County, California (the Parcels).1 Appellant owns land adjacent to the Parcels and holds an easement across one of the tracts to be taken in trust. On appeal to the Board, Appellant argues that the Regional Director failed to consider potential conflicts of land use that would result from taking the land in trust in light of past conflicts over access and use of Appellant’s easement. Appellant contends that due to the possibility of future conflicts regarding use of its easement, the Regional Director erred in failing to place any “enforceable conditions” on the trust title. Appellant also contends that the Regional Director failed to comply with the tribal consultation requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 54 U.S.C.