1956Aj. X V" O'! the Astronomical Journal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
X O'!V" THE ASTRONOMICAL 1956AJ. JOURNAL Founded by B. A. Gould PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 61 1956 April - No. 1237 NUMBER 3 REDSHIFTS AND MAGNITUDES OF EXTRAGALACTIC NEBULAE * By M. L. HUMASON, N. U. MAYALL, and A. R. SANDAGE Abstract. There are three main sections to the present discussion. Part I contains redshifts of 620 extragalactic nebulae observed at Mount Wilson and Palomar. Included in these data are redshifts for 26 clusters of nebulae. Part II contains redshifts for 300 nebulae observed at Lick, together with a comparison of results for 114 nebulae in common with the Mount Wilson-Palomar lists. Part III is a discussion of these new redshift data in combination with photometric data. The redshift-apparent magnitude relation is investigated for (1) field nebulae with and without regard to nebular type, (2) isolated groups, and (3) clusters of nebulae. The principal corrections applied to the apparent magnitudes are dis- cussed in two of the three appendices. Appendix A gives the procedure for correcting the published magnitudes for the effect of different photometer apertures. Appendix B describes the theory and computation of the correction for the selective effect of redshifts. In the final Appendix C, a provisional evaluation of the Hubble redshift parameter H is made by two independent methods. The principal results of this study may be stated as follows. (1) For those nebulae observed in common there is a negligible mean systematic difference between the redshifts from the two sources. (2) Spectrographico coverage is 63 per cent complete to mpg = 12.9 in the Shapley-Ames catalogue for nebulae north of ô = —30 . (3) The log redshift-magni- tude relation for field nebulae with and without regard to type is linear to within the accuracy of the data. (4) The log redshift-magnitude relation for the cluster data confirms the linearity for small AX/Xo and shows an apparently significant departure from linearity for shifts of the order of AX/Xo = 0.2. This non-linearity indicates deceleration of the expansion if interpretation is made by theoretical equations due to Robertson. Because of the cosmological significance of this last result, the accuracies of the various quantities that lead to it are examined. It is concluded that a deceleration should be regarded as tentative until Whitford’s results are available for the spectral energy distribution of the distant nebulae, and until an adequate theory of stellar evolution is advanced to explain the Stebbins-Whitford effect. (5) The Hubble redshift parameter H is provisionally estimated from (a) the magnitudes of resolved stars in NGC 4321 that have been isolated from the emission H11 regions, and (b) from the assumption that the brightest field and cluster nebulae are giants of luminosity comparable to the Andromeda nebula, with the result that Ü = 180 km/sec per 106 pc. GENERAL INTRODUCTION nebulae, he regarded them in sum as a ‘‘prelimi- nary reconnaissance.” This appraisal, although More than 25 years ago Hubble (1929) an- a characteristic understatement, emphasized the nounced a relationship between velocities and need for many more nebular redshifts and mag- distances of extragalactic nebulae. Since he real- nitudes. These spectrographic and photometric ized that this first formulation referred to only a data are now available in considerable numbers, relatively small distance, he initiated an explora- on a systematic basis, and with improved preci- tory program to follow the relationship to the greatest distances attainable with the largest tele- sion, chiefly as the result of Hubble’s inspiring scope. The successful outcome of that program influence on his colleagues. has become widely known, especially through This paper contains as its principal new mate- publication of his book, The Realm of the Nebulae rial redshifts for over 800 nebulae observed dur- (Hubble 1936a), and his professional lectures. ing the 20-year interval from 1935 to 1955. While The last of these (Hubble 1953) summarizes the these redshifts doubtless could be discussed observational basis for the early restricted veloc- alone, one of the main reasons for obtaining them ity-distance relation, and the later far-reaching was their use as the higher-precision, independent law of redshifts. variable in correlations with nebular magnitudes. Despite the comprehensiveness of Hubble’s This unified treatment of spectrographic and extragalactic researches that used the 100-inch * Mount Wilson and Palomar Observatories, Reprint to the limits of its power for observations of faint No. 181. Lick Observatory Bulletin, No. 542. © American Astronomical Society • Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System X O'!V" 98 THE ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL 61, No. 1237 photometric data follows previous practice by the same telescope, spectrograph and two-prism Hubble, who, had he lived, would have partici- dispersion (except for one nebula observed with 1956AJ. pated as the senior author in the analysis and three prisms), it was feasible to list for each plate discussion. such details as slit-width, emulsion, exposure, Since photography of nebular spectra 20 years and an index of accuracy based on the agreement ago required much more telescope time than now, between redshifts for different spectral features. a cooperative program of nebular spectroscopy Such information reveals something of the tech- was started in 1935 at the Mount Wilson and nique, observing time, and order of precision in- Lick Observatories. The field was divided accord- volved in low-dispersion spectroscopy of nebulae. ing to the instrumental facilities. At Mount Following the last list of spectrographic data, Wilson, the fainter catalogued nebulae and the Table V and notes, the redshifts are discussed for faintest and smallest cluster nebulae were nat- (1) systematic differences for nebulae observed ural selections for the superior light-gathering in common at Mount Wilson-Palomar and at power and scale of the 100-inch ; at Lick, the Lick, and (2) degree of completeness in terms of brighter catalogued nebulae and the larger spirals the Shapley-Ames catalogue magnitudes. of low surface brightness were appropriate ob- Part III. Discussion of the Spectrographic and jects for the moderate capabilities of the 36-inch Photometric Data. This section contains quanti- Crossley. At both observatories the Shapley- tative evaluations of the relationships between Ames Catalogue of Bright External Galaxies (1932) redshifts and magnitudes for (1) field nebulae was used as the principal finding list and source with and without regard to nebular type, (2) iso- of magnitudes. Originally, the two programs sep- lated groups, and (3) the cluster nebulae. The arated the nebulae north of ô = — 30 o at the magnitudes for field nebulae were obtained prin- catalogue magnitude of 11.6, except that the cipally from Pettit’s (1954) large catalogue, sup- Crossley was used for most objects north of plemented with measures by Stebbins and Whit- the 100-inch limit at 5 = +64°. As the work ford (1952). The magnitudes for the faintest progressed, considerable overlap resulted over a cluster nebulae were obtained photographically fairly wide range in magnitude because of interest with the 200-inch and a jiggle-camera. Before in individual objects for special purposes, and the magnitudes were used, all were corrected for more than 100 nebulae were observed in common. the effects of different photometer apertures by The remainder of this paper is divided into the procedure given in Appendix A. The appen- three parts, which were written by the authors dix gives, moreover, the list of corrected magni- in the order shown by the line following the title. tudes for field nebulae, together with an analysis These parts may be described as follows : of the overlap between the Pettit and the Stebbins and Whitford photoelectric data, on the one hand, Part I. The Mount Wilson-Palomar Lists of and between the Pettit data and Holmberg’s un- Redshifts. These are subdivided into three tables published precision photographic material, on the that include non-cluster objects, bright nebulae other. Additional corrections to all magnitudes in clusters, and faint nebulae in clusters. This were made for the effects of redshift. These so- arrangement reflects the basic programs and called K corrections were computed by the pro- facilitates the treatment of the material for the cedure given in Appendix B. The redshift-magni- numerous brighter nebulae in the nearer clusters, tude correlations are discussed with theoretical such as those in Virgo and Coma, and the fewer relations given by Robertson (1955), in simplified fainter nebulae in the more distant clusters. Be- form for the nearer field nebulae, and with a cause of the considerable mass of the material, second-order term for the cluster nebulae. Finally, which was obtained with several different tele- in Appendix C a provisional evaluation of the scopes and with a variety of spectrographs and Hubble redshift parameter iJ is made from dis- dispersions, it was impracticable to include in the tance indicators calibrated in the nearby resolved tables all the detailed data for individual plates. systems. Instead, the number of plates and the dispersions are indicated in a summary column, and a mean PART I. MOUNT WILSON-PALOMAR redshift is given for each nebula. LISTS OF REDSHIFTS Part II. The Lick List of Redshifts. These are given in a single table, because the observing The systematic spectroscopic observation of program placed no special emphasis on cluster extragalactic nebulae at the Mount Wilson Ob- nebulae. Since all the plates were obtained with servatory was begun in 1928 at the request of © American Astronomical Society • Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System X O'!V" 1956 April THE ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL 99 Edwin Hubble, in order to test further the relation were made at the Cassegrain focus with a spec- he had found (Hubble 1929) between redshifts trograph which could not be rotated, using the 1956AJ.