Minutes for April 11Th, 2011, 7 Pm General Meeting
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Portland Parks and Recreation
Portland Parks and Recreation CBO has posted the online, interactive version of the bureau’s performance dashboard here: http://www.portlandoregon.gov/cbo/article/523266 The following questions were asked during the bureau’s budget work session. Responses are included in the attached packet. 1. Please provide a breakdown of scholarships by community center. 2. What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? 3. Did the increase in the value of scholarships granted correspond to the number or participants in the program? Was there an increase in workload or did the cost of the programs go up? 4. List/plans of the following: Five-year major maintenance queue Five-year SDC funded projects Prior five-year SDC fund projects 5. Please provide descriptions and budget amounts for the two new requests: (1) parks rangers expansion and (2) tree code implementation PP&R Council Budget Questions – Follow up from March 17th Budget presentation: 1) Breakdown of scholarships by community center See Attached Scholarship PDF File 2) What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? Rather than close whole facilities or parks when there is inadequate major maintenance funding we reduce levels of service (thin the soup) across the system and we also delay repairs and replacements, thus allowing the risk of failure to increase. Examples are the sewer back up at Sellwood, the sewer failure at Buckman Field House, the emergency culvert failures, etc. The one counter example that resulted a full closure and demolition was the wood play structure at Couch Park. -
Open Gardens2016
THE HARDY PLANT SOCIETY OF OREGON OPEN GARDENS2016 gardeners growing together Garden Thyme Nursery Harvest Nursery Hydrangeas Plus Nowlens Bridge Perennials Out in the Garden Nursery Sebright Gardens Secret Garden Growers Bailey garden 2016 Open Garden season is about to begin! Welcome to this year’s directory of approximately 100 listings covering a wide variety of wonderful gardens and nurseries to visit all season. Many gardens will be open on the weekends, and evening openings are on the second and fourth Mondays of June, July, August and September. The Directory has been prepared by a dedicated committee led by Chair Tom Barreto, assisted by Ruth Clark, Merle Dole-Reid, Jenn Ferrante, Barry Gates, Jim Rondone, Pam Skalicky, Lise Storc and Bruce Wakefield. Tom is also much appreciated for his beautiful photography which graces the cover this year. Special thanks to Linda Wisner for cover design, advice and production direction and a very big thank you to Bruce Wakefield for his help with a process that is always time consuming; we are very grateful. We have worked hard to assure the accuracy of the listings in the 2016 Open Gardens Directory, but if you find an error or omission, please contact the HPSO office at 503-224-5718. Corrections will be announced in the HPSO weekly email blasts. And most importantly, our deepest thanks to the generous and welcoming HPSO members who are sharing their gardens this year. We appreciate the opportunity to learn from, and enjoy, your remarkable gardens. 1 VISITOR GUIDELINES TO GOOD GARDEN ETIQUETTE We are fortunate to be able to visit so many glorious gardens through our HPSO membership. -
Downloads.Gigl.Org.Uk/Website/Parks People and Nature1.Pdf 8 Flores, T
AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michelle Lee Talal for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science presented on May 7, 2019 Title: Exploring Urban Parks: Plant Communities, Visitor Experiences, and Manager Perspectives in Portland, Oregon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Mary V. Santelmann Urban parks are biodiversity hotspots within cities and have the potential to provide a range of socio-cultural benefits for people, but may not always meet the needs and desires of park visitors. A variety of land use practices and environmental factors affect urban park biodiversity and vegetation structure, composition, and ecological function, but more studies are needed to compare plant taxonomic composition, biodiversity patterns, and species traits across different types of urban green spaces. Additionally, there is a lack of research that explores park user experiences, vegetation perceptions, and accessibility issues in a range of urban park types interspersed throughout Portland using qualitative methods to observe and interview visitors on-site. More research is also needed that focuses on interviewing park managers about their perspectives on park benefits and management. The findings of my interdisciplinary dissertation may assist managers in their aims to achieve various ecological goals, as well as meet the needs and desires of park visitors within increasingly developed urban areas. The purpose of this research is three-fold, and includes examining: 1) The relationships between plant community composition, biodiversity patterns, environmental variables, and species traits in a range of urban parks in Portland, Oregon; 2) how the vegetation in these urban parks currently meets the needs and desires of visitors; and 3) how park managers currently manage vegetation in the parks to meet the needs and desires of visitors. -
PP Annual Report Exec Summary V4.Indd
2015–16 Dear Portlanders: Thank you for your recent commitment to repairing and improving Portland’s parks. In November 2014, you and an impressive 74 percent of Portlanders voted “Yes” for the Parks Replacement Bond Projects26 underway — the highest percentage ever for a Parks ballot measure. You became part of a long tradition of Portlanders who’ve built and maintained our city’s enviable collection of park facilities. In this fi rst full year of the Bond, from July 2015 to July 2016, we’ve laid the foundation for the work to be done. In this upcoming year, you’ll start to see tangible results in the parks. Replacement of the 70 to 90 year old mechanical systems at Grant Pool was the fi rst completed project, and next year, results will be visible across the city. Project1 completed About every nine years over the last century, Portlanders have invested in increasing, preserving and maintaining our park system by voting “yes” on parks bonds or levies. Before the 2014 bond, the last major bond was in 1994, meaning 20 years passed without signifi cant park improvements or address- ing dire repair needs. Portland Parks & Recreation anticipates a $248 million funding gap for major maintenance needs over the next 10 years. The $68 million in funds from the 2014 Parks Replacement Bond will not address all of these maintenance issues, but it is vital to fi xing, upgrading and replacing the most crucial of these needs. Projects18 ahead of As your Parks Commissioner and Parks Director, we are making sure the funds will be used wisely and schedule maximize benefi ts to the greatest number of park users. -
PP&R's FY 2021-22 Requested Budget
Requested Budget FY 2021-22 Portland Parks & Recreation PP&R Staff FY 2021-22 Requested Budget Maximo Behrens, Recreation Services Manager Tonya Booker, Land Stewardship Manager Carmen Rubio, Commissioner-in-charge Jenn Cairo, Urban Forestry Manager Tim Collier, Public Information Manager Adena Long, Director Margaret Evans, Workforce Development Manager Todd Lofgren, Deputy Director Vicente Harrison, Security and Emergency Manager Lauren McGuire, Assets and Development Manager Claudio Campuzano, Manager Kenya Williams, Equity and Inclusion Manager Finance, Property, & Technology Department Kerry Anderson Andre Ashley Don Athey Darryl Brooks Budget Advisory Committee Tamara Burkovskaia Krystin Castro Board Members Riley Clark-Long Paul Agrimis Mara Cogswell Mike Elliott Dale Cook Jenny Glass Terri Davis Juan Piantino Leah Espinoza Paddy Tillett Rachel Felice Bonnie Gee Yosick Joan Hallquist Erin Zollenkopf Erik Harrison Britta Herwig Labor Partners Brett Horner Sadie Atwell, Laborers Local 483 Don Joughin Luis Flores, PCL Brian Landoe Yoko Silk, PTE-17 Robin Laughlin Sara Mayhew-Jenkins Community Representatives Todd Melton Pauline Miranda Jeremy Robbins, Portland Accessibility Advisory Council Soo Pak Andre Middleton, Friends of Noise Dylan Paul Chris Rempel, Native American Community Advisory Council Nancy Roth JR Lilly, East Portland Action Plan Victor Sanders Joe McFerrin, Portland Opportunities Industrialization Center Jamie Sandness Brian Flores Garcia, Youth Durelle Singleton Sabrina Wilson, Rosewood Initiative Chris Silkie Jenny -
2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide -
Download PDF File 2019-20
2019–20 YEAR 5 PARKS BOND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY YEAR 5 Dear Portlanders, We are happy to report that 46 of the 52 Bond projects have been completed, with the remaining six projects underway. Your investment has been used wisely. Year 5 of the Bond started out as planned: • In July 2019, Commissioner Fish cut the ribbon on the completely overhauled Peninsula Pool. • In October 2019, the community gathered to celebrate a more accessible playground at Glenhaven Park. • Construction wrapped up on the installation of new play pieces and drainage repairs at over 30 parks. Sadly, 2020 started off with the loss of our colleague and beloved Parks Commissioner, Nick Fish. And then COVID-19 hit. With some adaptations, Bond projects stayed on track. Construction began on a new playground for Creston Park, and we completed a new playground at Verdell Burdine Rutherford Park, the first Portland park to be named solely after a Black woman. The public health crisis was followed by a groundswell of action for racial justice. Now, our parks and open spaces are even more precious than ever, serving as shared public spaces to exercise our bodies, our minds, and our voices. While this Bond could only tackle the most critical maintenance needs, it has given us all a glimpse of what we can achieve together. Let’s continue to create a more sustainable and more equitable future for our city and our parks. Stay safe, stay healthy, and stay hopeful. Sincerely, Commissioner Amanda Fritz Portland Parks & Recreation Director Adena Long 1 PARKS BOND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY YEAR 5 46Projects completed Glenhaven Park playground opening celebration Projects6 underway Peninsula Pool opening celebration Current3 projects ahead of or on schedule Marshall Park bridge construction 2 PARKS BOND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY YEAR 5 NORTH Acquisitions at Cathedral, Open Meadow. -
The Urban Forestry Management Plan Technical Advisory Committee
Courtesy Phyllis Reynolds Phyllis Courtesy P ORTLAND U RBAN FORESTRY M ANAGEMENT PLAN 2 0 0 4 Prepared by Portland Parks & Recreation and the Urban Forestry Management Plan Technical Advisory Committee Project Staff Nancy Harvey Gronowski, Senior Planner - Portland Parks & Recreation Rob Crouch, Urban Forestry Coordinator - Portland Parks & Recreation Jennifer Curkendall, Graduate Student - University of Oregon Carol Trevor, Graphic Designer - Portland Parks & Recreation Adopted by City Council December 10, 2003 Resolution No. 36189 Portland Parks & Recreation Jim Francesconi, Commissioner-in-Charge Zari Santner, Director Robin Grimwade, Planning & Development Division Manager Janet Bebb, Planning Program Manager Brian McNerney, City Forester Portland City Council Vera Katz, Mayor Jim Francesconi, Commissioner Randy Leonard, Commissioner Dan Saltzman, Commissioner Eric Sten, Commissioner Printed on 100% Recycled Paper March 2004 Technical Advisory Committee Harry Auerbach, City Attorneys Office Darlene Carlson, Commissioner Francesconis Office (former) Rob Crouch, Portland Parks & Recreation Sallie Edmunds, Bureau of Planning Matt Emlen, Office of Sustainable Development Dave Flood, Portland Fire & Rescue Jane Foreman, Friends of Trees Dave Kliewer, Bureau of Environmental Services Deb Lev, Portland Parks & Recreation Jerry Markesino, Office of Transportation Brian McNerney, Portland Parks & Recreation Joe Poracsky, Portland State University Kristin Ramstad, Oregon Department of Forestry Kermit Robinson, Bureau of Development Services Chad Smith, Endangered Species Act Program John Warner, Urban Forestry Commission Kelley Webb, Metro Urban Forestry Commission David A. Johnson, Chair Terrill Collier Francine Corriere Michael Harrison Susan Landauer Wayne Lei (former) Dick Pugh Phyllis Reynolds John Warner Barbara Warren Sams Ed Washington Funding for this plan was provided by: Grants from the Endangered Species Act Program and the Oregon Department of Forestry in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service and Portland Parks & Recreation. -
2016 Park System Development Charge 20-Year Capital Plan (Summary)
187770 Exhibit A 2016 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funded with Park SDC revenue. The total value of projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), may be modified at any time. Changes to this list will not affect the SDC rates, unless the Council holds a public hearing and authorizes the changes, as provided in ORS 223.309(2). TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: Land acquisition Develop new parks on new land Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc Increase playability, durability and life of facilities Natural area restoration Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities SDC Zone Program Site Project Name % Growth Years 1 - 5 Years 6 - 10 Years 11 -10 Total 20 Years Total * Growth % Central City Acquisitions Central City Unidentified Central City Acquisitions 100% $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Central City Acquisition Placeholder Downtown 100% -
Open Gardens2017
THE HARDY PLANT SOCIETY OF OREGON OPEN GARDENS2017 gardeners growing together Clematis photo by Merle Dole-Reid INTRODUCTION 2017 Open Garden season is about to begin! Welcome to this year’s directory of approximately 100 listings covering a wide variety of wonderful gardens and nurseries to visit all season. Many gardens will be open on the weekends, and evening openings are on the second and fourth Mondays of June, July, August, and September. The Directory has been prepared by a dedicated committee led by Chair Tom Barreto, assisted by Ruth Clark, Merle Dole-Reid, Jenn Ferrante, Barry Gates, Jim Rondone, Pam Skalicky, Lise Storc, and Bruce Wakefield. Tom is also much appreciated for his beautiful photography which graces the cover this year and to Merle Dole-Reid’s photograph on this page. Special thanks to Linda Wisner for cover design, advice and production direction, and a very big thank you to Bruce Wakefield for his help with a process that is always time consuming; we are very grateful. We have worked hard to assure the accuracy of the listings in the 2017 the Open Gardens Directory, but if you find an error or omission, please contact the HPSO office at 503-224-5718. Corrections will be announced in the HPSO weekly email blasts. New this year, you can now open your garden more spontaneously if your garden looks fantastic that week by sending a message to Bruce at [email protected]. He will redirect you to an Open Garden Committee member who can help you with a garden description and get your notice out in the weekly email to the rest of HPSO. -
Metro Master Gardener™ News March 2010
Metro Master Gardener™ News March 2010 OSU Extension Service Metro Master Gardener™ Program Serving Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washing- ton Counties in the metro area since 1976. Mission Statement We provide relevant, research-based edu- cation and outreach to the public of Table of Contents Page Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties about horticulture and household Metro Program Update from Weston and Jordis 2 pests. This information promotes sustain- Opportunities from Jordis 4 able practices that minimize risks to hu- Coordinator’s List 5 man health and the environment. Natter’s Notes– Updates 6 Program Staff Garden Discovery Day 9 Weston Miller- Horticulture Faculty Additions to Oregon’s Noxious Weeds List 10 [email protected] Quiz Corner 11 (503) 650-3124 Computer Class Information 12 Jordis Yost- Program Assistant Internet Essentials for MGs 13 [email protected] Gardens in Senior Living 14 (503) 650-3118 Better Living Show 15 Newsletter Volunteers Reference Case 16 Ellen Hanley- Volunteer Editor Washington County Plant Sale Flyer 17 [email protected] Book Review—Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast 18 Heidi Nichols- Proof Reader Haggen Planting Days 19 [email protected] Horticultural Calendar 20 Mailing Address Washington County Speakers 21 Clackamas County Extension Service Multnomah County Chapter Page 22 200 Warner-Milne Rd. Washington County Chapter Page 23 Oregon City, OR 97045 Clackamas County Chapter Page 24 Photos from Jane Collier’s pruning clinic 25 Monthly To Do Calendar 26 OSU Extension Service Metro Master Gardener Newsletter March 2010 1 Program Updates Happy spring! It seems that mild weather has come early this year. -
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Boys and Girls Club
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Boys and Girls Club 9330 SE Harold Street Portland, Oregon October 1, 2010 Prepared for Portland Development Commission Portland, Oregon 333 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97204 (503) 542-1080 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROUND 1 WORK PERFORMED 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 USE OF THIS REPORT 6 REFERENCES 8 FIGURES Figure Title 1 Vicinity Map 2 Anomalies and Subsurface Investigation Locations TABLES Table Title 1 Summary of Geophysical Anomaly Exploration 2 Test Pit Analytical Results 3 Soil Boring Analytical Results APPENDICES Appendix Title A Photograph Log B Boring Logs and Geotechnical Hole Reports C Laboratory Analytical Reports 10/1/10 I:\PROJECTS\1095\006\020\FILERM\R\FINAL PHASE II ESA\PHASE II ESA_RPT_FINAL.DOCX LANDAU ASSOCIATES ii INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the findings of a focused Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted for the Lents Boys and Girls Club of Portland located at 9330 SE Harold Street in Portland, Oregon (subject property, Figure 1). The focused Phase II ESA was conducted by Landau Associates for the Portland Development Commission (PDC), based on the statement of work outlined in our scope of work dated July 28, 2010. This report summarizes the field activities conducted during the Phase II ESA and discusses the investigation findings and results. Conclusions based on the findings and recommendations for further action, as appropriate, are also included. BACKGROUND The Phase I ESA performed by Landau Associates (Landau Associates 2010) revealed evidence of two recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property: • Between 1935 and 1970, a gasoline/service station was located on the northeast corner of SE Harold Street and SE 92nd Avenue, directly across SE Harold Street from the subject property.