DOCSLIB.ORG

Requested Budget FY 2017-18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Requested Budget FY 2017-18 WORLD CUP SOCCER DELTA PARK Requested Budget FY 2017-18 Portland Parks & Recreation FY 2017-18 Requested Budget Budget Development Team Finance Department | Jeff Shaffer, Finance Manager Mike Abbatè, Director James Allison The Portland Parks & Recreation FY 2017-18 Requested Budget is a Eileen Argentina complex and enormous project which takes many disciplines throughout Pooja Bhatt the bureau, as well as critical public input. I personally want to thank the Jenn Cairo Tim Crail following people who contributed throughout this budget process toward Margaret Evans the development of this budget. Diana Fielitz Amanda Fritz, Commissioner Karen Guillén-Chapman Art Hendricks Budget Advisory Committee Brett Horner Elizabeth Kennedy-Wong Portland Parks Board Members Trang Lam Carolyn Quan Lee Jeff Anderson Zalane Nunn Judy Bluehorse Skelton – Chair Kia Selly Tonya Booker Jeff Shaffer Kendall Clawson Jason Smith Aubré Dickson Som Nath Subedi Kathy Fong Stevens Jennifer Yocom Patricia Frobes Jenny Glass Ian Jaquiss BRASS Team Dion Jordan Karen Aker Jim Owens Bryan Aptekar Meryl Redisch Karen Birt Gladys Ruiz Neal Brown Ty Schwoeffermann Kristine Canham Christa Stout Cynthia Castro Paddy Tillett Dennis Choquette – Lead Sue Van Brocklin Terri Davis Amourie Downing Labor Partners Gregory Dubay Scotty Fairchild (PP&R Park Services) – DCTU Josh Green Tim Haberman (PP&R Recreation) – Local 483 Tim Hammock Mike Keebaugh (PP&R Structural Services) – DCTU Amie Massier Gerry Verhoef (PP&R Engineering) – COPPEA Heather McKillip Michelle Meyer Coalition/Community Representatives Shawn Rogers Nancy Roth Tom Badrick, East Portland Neighborhood Office Jamie Sandness Carol Chesarek, Neighbors West/Northwest Durelle Singleton Jamal Dar, African Youth Community Organization Jeanne Sprague Diego Gioseffi, Northeast Coalition of Neighbors MaryAnn Thibeault Phil Kalberer, Downtown Business Community Craig Vanderbout Angela Moos, North Portland Neighborhood Office Michael Walsh Steve Mullinax, Southwest Neighbors Inc. Craig Ward Jaclyn Sarna, Hacienda CDC Josh Wells Todd Struble, APANO Communications Team Margaret Evans Joan Hallquist Judy Jewell Elizabeth Kennedy-Wong Trang Lam Sara Mayhew-Jenkins Mark Ross Georgia West Lorraine Wilson Jennifer Yocom Photo by Fred Joe Finance & Analysis Team Dennis Choquette Diana Fielitz Sarah Huggins Ryan Kinsella – City Budget Office Todd Melton Michelle Meyer Pauline Miranda PORTLANDOREGON.GOV | Amanda Fritz, Commissioner | Mike Abbaté, Director Jason Smith Sustaining a healthy park and recreation system to make Portland a great place to live, work and play. Table of Contents Transmittal Letter from Commissioner-In-Charge ........................................................................ 1-2 Budget Advisory Committee Letter ..................................................................................... 3-4 Bureau Summary Bureau Overview ....................................................................................................................5 Organization Chart ..................................................................................................................6 Bureau Mission .......................................................................................................................7 Strategic Direction...................................................................................................................9 Summary of Budget Decisions........................................................................................10-27 Capital Budget Capital Summary .............................................................................................................27-30 Capital Planning & Budgeting .........................................................................................30-31 Capital Programs & Projects ...........................................................................................31-33 Program Area Summaries Recreation.......................................................................................................................35-36 Support ................................................................................................................................ 37 Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................39-40 Community ........................................................................................................................... 41 Performance Measures ..........................................................................................................42-43 Summary of Bureau Budget Resources and Requirements ............................................................................................. 44 CIP Summary ..................................................................................................................45-47 FTE Summary .................................................................................................................48-51 Fund Overviews Parks Local Option Levy Fund ............................................................................................. 53 Portland Parks Memorial Fund ............................................................................................ 55 Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund.....................................................................57-58 Parks Endowment Fund....................................................................................................... 59 Golf Fund ........................................................................................................................ 61-62 Portland International Raceway Fund .................................................................................. 63 Capital Improvement Plan Summaries .................................................................................65-86 BRASS Decision Package Summaries .............................................................................. 87-126 Five-Year Financial Plans ................................................................................................. 127-129 Cost of Service Fee Study ................................................................................................ 131-160 Budget Equity Assessment Tool ..................................................................................... 161-178 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2017-18 Page iii This page intentionally left blank Page iv City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2017-18 Amanda Fritz, Commissioner 1221 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 220 Portland, Oregon 97204 (503) 823-3008 [email protected] City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2017-18 Page 1 Page 2 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2017-18 January 27, 2017 Dear Mayor Wheeler and City Council, As the Portland Parks & Recreation Budget Advisory Committee, we are responsible for advising Director Abbaté and Commissioner Fritz on the Requested Budget. This is a significant responsibility—made even more difficult by this year’s request to provide recommendations that reduce our budget by 5%. For many of us, this is not the first time we have been given this task. It is never simple. Parks, community centers, pools and natural areas are necessary to our quality of life, provide essential services to vulnerable populations and are often the first interaction between the City of Portland and New Portlanders. Although we are united in our support for the Requested Budget, we are also united in our belief that we do not support the reductions. While we find these proposed reductions difficult, we are confident that they reflect the hard thinking and commitment to values that we have defined and articulated as a committee. While the committee began meeting in early November, PP&R started planning this process at the conclusion of the BAC process for FY 2016/17. PP&R staff asked for feedback from the committee on how to improve the process for the next year. Key recommendations from the BAC at that time included: • More input into the development of budget packages • Restructure the meetings to allow better participation • Increase efforts to engage immigrants and communities of color in the process It was clear to those of us who have participated for several years, that these recommendations were taken seriously and changes were made. Administration 1120 SW 5th Ave., Suite 1302 PORTLANDPARKS.ORG Portland, OR 97204 Commissioner Amanda Fritz Tel: (503) 823-7529 Fax: (503) 823-6007 Director Mike Abbaté Sustaining a healthy park and recreation system to make Portland a great place to live, work and play. City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2017-18 Page 3 In addition to inviting the BAC to be involved in shaping the budget packages, PP&R also spent more time working with the committee to understand how equity and our values could be used to evaluate reductions. Additionally, staff encouraged BAC members to attend “Listening Sessions” with communities of color to provide often unheard community members with a forum to articulate their values and priorities. Experiences like this helped many to move beyond a dominant culture framework and better represent the entire Portland community and we recognize the need to continue working towards a more inclusive process. After three BAC meetings, two public meetings, Listening Sessions, and targeted community outreach through the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Portland Parks and Recreation
    Portland Parks and Recreation CBO has posted the online, interactive version of the bureau’s performance dashboard here: http://www.portlandoregon.gov/cbo/article/523266 The following questions were asked during the bureau’s budget work session. Responses are included in the attached packet. 1. Please provide a breakdown of scholarships by community center. 2. What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? 3. Did the increase in the value of scholarships granted correspond to the number or participants in the program? Was there an increase in workload or did the cost of the programs go up? 4. List/plans of the following: Five-year major maintenance queue Five-year SDC funded projects Prior five-year SDC fund projects 5. Please provide descriptions and budget amounts for the two new requests: (1) parks rangers expansion and (2) tree code implementation PP&R Council Budget Questions – Follow up from March 17th Budget presentation: 1) Breakdown of scholarships by community center See Attached Scholarship PDF File 2) What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? Rather than close whole facilities or parks when there is inadequate major maintenance funding we reduce levels of service (thin the soup) across the system and we also delay repairs and replacements, thus allowing the risk of failure to increase. Examples are the sewer back up at Sellwood, the sewer failure at Buckman Field House, the emergency culvert failures, etc. The one counter example that resulted a full closure and demolition was the wood play structure at Couch Park.
    [Show full text]
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • Make a Plan to VOTE! Two Ways to Return Your Ballot: 1
    Make a Plan to VOTE! Two ways to return your ballot: 1. Vote early & return your ballot by mail. Get it in the mail by Tue., Oct. 27. No stamp needed! 2. Return to any Official Ballot Drop Site in Oregon by 8 PM Nov 3, 2020. Multnomah County Voters’ Pamphlet November 3, 2020 General Election Dear Multnomah County Voter: This Voters’ Pamphlet for the Nov. 3, 2020 General Election is being mailed to all residential households in Multnomah County. Due to the size of both the State and County Voters’ Pamphlet the pamphlets are being mailed separately. If you don’t have your State Voters’ Pamphlet yet, look for it in the mail soon. In advance of the election we are asking voters to Make a Plan to VOTE! Here is what you can do to be ready for the election and ensure your vote is counted: 1. Register to VOTE. Update your voter registration information or register to vote at oregonvotes.gov/myvote. The Voter Registration Deadline is Oct. 13. Sign up to Track Your Ballot at multco.us/trackyourballot. 2. Get your ballot. You will receive your ballot in the mail beginning Oct. 14. If you have not received your ballot by Oct. 22, take action and contact the elections office. 3. VOTE your ballot. Remember to sign your ballot return envelope. Your signature is your identification. If you forget to sign or your signature does not match we will contact you so you can take action and we can count your vote. 4. Return your ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads.Gigl.Org.Uk/Website/Parks People and Nature1.Pdf 8 Flores, T
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michelle Lee Talal for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science presented on May 7, 2019 Title: Exploring Urban Parks: Plant Communities, Visitor Experiences, and Manager Perspectives in Portland, Oregon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Mary V. Santelmann Urban parks are biodiversity hotspots within cities and have the potential to provide a range of socio-cultural benefits for people, but may not always meet the needs and desires of park visitors. A variety of land use practices and environmental factors affect urban park biodiversity and vegetation structure, composition, and ecological function, but more studies are needed to compare plant taxonomic composition, biodiversity patterns, and species traits across different types of urban green spaces. Additionally, there is a lack of research that explores park user experiences, vegetation perceptions, and accessibility issues in a range of urban park types interspersed throughout Portland using qualitative methods to observe and interview visitors on-site. More research is also needed that focuses on interviewing park managers about their perspectives on park benefits and management. The findings of my interdisciplinary dissertation may assist managers in their aims to achieve various ecological goals, as well as meet the needs and desires of park visitors within increasingly developed urban areas. The purpose of this research is three-fold, and includes examining: 1) The relationships between plant community composition, biodiversity patterns, environmental variables, and species traits in a range of urban parks in Portland, Oregon; 2) how the vegetation in these urban parks currently meets the needs and desires of visitors; and 3) how park managers currently manage vegetation in the parks to meet the needs and desires of visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the River 2006-07
    State of the River 2006–07 iver Renaissance is the City of Portland’s initiative to reclaim the Willamette River as a community centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the Columbia River. The Willamette is the heart of Portland’s landscape, history, and culture. The Columbia is our economic and ecologic lifeline to the Pacific. River Renaissance Rpromotes and celebrates these waters as living emblems of Portland’s identity. Portland lives its river values every day in ways big and small. Together these actions are reconnecting citizens and businesses with a healthier river. The State of the River Report profiles yearly accomplishments and identifi es future actions needed to assure a clean and healthy river, a prosperous harbor, and vibrant riverfronts. Just a few of the actions detailed in this report are illustrated on this page to give some idea of how deeply Portland believes in caring for—and being cared for by—our rivers. 2006–07 State of the River Report Contents River Renaissance is a Leadership . 2 community-wide initiative to Message from the River Renaissance Directors . 3 reclaim the Willamette River Introduction . 4 as Portland’s centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the How the City that Works Works on the River . 5 Columbia River. The initiative Accomplishments and Key Actions . 7 promotes and celebrates Portland’s Progress Measures . 23 waters as our chief environmental, 2007–2008 Action Agenda . 35 economic and urban asset. Up and Down the Willamette . 55 Partners . 61 Recommended Readings . 63 The 2006–07 State of the River Report summarizes the achievements made by the City of Portland and a network of community partners to revitalize our rivers and identifies next steps needed to continue progress.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment Objective 1: Restore
    A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment In November 2002, Portland voters approved a five-year Parks Levy to begin in July 2003. Levy dollars restored budget cuts made in FY 2002-03 as well as major services and improvements outlined in the Parks 2020 Vision plan adopted by City Council in July 2001. In order to fulfill our obligation to the voters, we identified four key objectives. This report highlights what we have accomplished to date. Objective 1: Restore $2.2 million in cuts made in 2002/03 budget The 2003 Parks Levy restored cuts that were made to balance the FY 2002-03 General Fund budget. These cuts included the closure of some recreational facilities, the discontinuation and reduction of some community partnerships that provide recreational opportunities for youth, and reductions in maintenance of parks and facilities. Below is a detailed list of services restored through levy dollars. A. Restore programming at six community schools. SUN Community Schools support healthy social and cross-cultural development of all participants, teach and model values of respect and inclusion of all people, and help reduce social disparities and inequities. Currently, over 50% of students enrolled in the program are children of color. 2003/04 projects/services 2004/05 projects/services Proposed projects/services 2005/06 Hired and trained full-time Site Coordinators Total attendance at new sites (Summer Continue to develop programming to serve for 6 new PP&R SUN Community Schools: 2004-Spring 2005): 85,159 the needs of each school’s community and Arleta, Beaumont, Centennial, Clarendon, increase participation in these programs.
    [Show full text]
  • PP&R's FY 2021-22 Requested Budget
    Requested Budget FY 2021-22 Portland Parks & Recreation PP&R Staff FY 2021-22 Requested Budget Maximo Behrens, Recreation Services Manager Tonya Booker, Land Stewardship Manager Carmen Rubio, Commissioner-in-charge Jenn Cairo, Urban Forestry Manager Tim Collier, Public Information Manager Adena Long, Director Margaret Evans, Workforce Development Manager Todd Lofgren, Deputy Director Vicente Harrison, Security and Emergency Manager Lauren McGuire, Assets and Development Manager Claudio Campuzano, Manager Kenya Williams, Equity and Inclusion Manager Finance, Property, & Technology Department Kerry Anderson Andre Ashley Don Athey Darryl Brooks Budget Advisory Committee Tamara Burkovskaia Krystin Castro Board Members Riley Clark-Long Paul Agrimis Mara Cogswell Mike Elliott Dale Cook Jenny Glass Terri Davis Juan Piantino Leah Espinoza Paddy Tillett Rachel Felice Bonnie Gee Yosick Joan Hallquist Erin Zollenkopf Erik Harrison Britta Herwig Labor Partners Brett Horner Sadie Atwell, Laborers Local 483 Don Joughin Luis Flores, PCL Brian Landoe Yoko Silk, PTE-17 Robin Laughlin Sara Mayhew-Jenkins Community Representatives Todd Melton Pauline Miranda Jeremy Robbins, Portland Accessibility Advisory Council Soo Pak Andre Middleton, Friends of Noise Dylan Paul Chris Rempel, Native American Community Advisory Council Nancy Roth JR Lilly, East Portland Action Plan Victor Sanders Joe McFerrin, Portland Opportunities Industrialization Center Jamie Sandness Brian Flores Garcia, Youth Durelle Singleton Sabrina Wilson, Rosewood Initiative Chris Silkie Jenny
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
    2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Pilot Program Evaluation 2 (1)
    Portland Ecodistrict Pilot Program Evaluation Report of Findings FEBRUARY 2015 © 2015 EcoDistricts. All Rights Reserved 1223 SW Washington St., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97205 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Background 7 Beyond the Portland Pilot 10 Pilot Evaluations 11 South of Market 12 South Waterfront 22 Foster-Green (Lents) 32 Gateway 44 Lloyd 52 Lessons Learned 60 Appendix 64 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Through the support of the Bullitt Foundation, EcoDistricts undertook an evaluation of the Portland Ecodistrict Pilot program, a three-year partnership between the City of Portland, Portland Development Commission (PDC) and Portland Sustainability Institute (PoSI) to accelerate sustainable neighborhood-scale projects in five districts throughout Portland between 2009 and 2012. The City selected the five following districts to participate in the program in order to promote sustainability across a diverse set of neighborhood “typologies”: • Portland State University - South of Market Ecodistrict (“SoMa”) • North Macadam Urban Renewal Area - South Waterfront Ecodistrict • Lents Urban Renewal Area - Foster-Green Ecodistrict • Gateway Urban Renewal Area - Gateway Ecodistrict • Lloyd District - Lloyd Ecodistrict This evaluation is one element of a four-part Bullitt funded project to more deeply understand best practices for district and neighborhood sustainable development in the region. The four elements are: Portland Pilot program evaluation; analysis of neighborhood sustainability projects in the Cascadia Region; update of the EcoDistricts Protocol; and a technical guide for green infrastructure and ecosystem services. All four elements of this project have been designed to inform the development of the Global EcoDistricts Protocol and other EcoDistricts-initiated programs intended to accelerate district-scale sustainable development in the region and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Portland Public Schools Extended Day Care Program
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 082 855 95 PS 006.947 AUTHOR Sposito, Patricia J. TITLE Evaluation of Portland Public Schools Extended Day Care Program. Final Report. INSTITUTION Metropolitan Community Coordinated Child Care (4-C) Council, Portland, Oreg.; Multnomah County Intermediate Education District, Portland, Oreg. SPONS AGENCY National Center for Educational Research and' Development (DHEW/OE), Washington, D.C. Regional Research Program. BUREAU NO BR-2-J-014 PUB DATE Dec 72 CONTRACT OEC-X-72-0014(057) NOTE 149p. EDR-S PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS Cognitive Development; *Day.Care Programs; *Elementary School Students; *Evaluation; Instructional Staff; Objectives; Parent Participation; Personnel Evaluation; *Program Effectiveness; *Public Schools; Questionnaires; Summative Evaluation IDENTIFIERS *Extended Day Program; Oregon; Portland ABSTRACT The Extended Day Program (EDP) provides before and after school day care service to children in public school buildings. This summative evaluation judges the degree to which EDP has met its goals and served its clients, and provides recommendations for program improvement. The evaluator observed each center over a 6-month period; distributed a questionnaire to EDP staff and public school staff to discover their opinions of the program; interviewed parents, principals, and staff; evaluated an orientation workshop; and videotaped selected program activities. Phase I of the report, February-May 1972, concluded that EDP did not meet its major objectives. Much of the failure lay with inadequate program planning and administrative weaknesses. The program continued, but time limits were suggested within which positive changes should occur. In Phase II, the summer EDP program was evaluated and also found inadequate. Recommendations were made regarding facilities, analysis of programming, and use of existing community resources.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended
    ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended Accept Park System Development Charge Methodology Update Report for implementation, and amend the applicable sections of City Code (Ordinance; amend Code Chapter 17.13) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. Ordinance No. 172614, passed by the Council on August 19, 1998 authorized establishment of a Parks and Recreation System Development Charge(SDC) and created a new City Code Chapter 17.13. 2. In October 1998 the City established a Parks SDC program. City Code required that the program be updated every two years to ensure that program goals were being met. An update was implemented on July 1, 2005 pursuant to Ordinance No. 179008, as amended. The required update reviewed the Parks SDC Program to determine that sufficient money will be available to fund capacity-increasing facilities identified by the Parks SDC-CIP; to determine whether the adopted and indexed SDC rate has kept pace with inflation; to determine whether the Parks SDC-CIP should be modified; and to ensure that SDC receipts will not over-fund such facilities. 3. Ordinance No 175774, passed by the Council on July 12, 2001 adopted The Parks 2020 Vision. This report highlighted significant challenges confronting the City in regards to shoring up our ailing park facilities, eliminating inequity in underserved neighborhoods, and providing a stable source of funding to address not just our existing shortfalls, but to also meet the needs created by new development. The Park SDC is the most significant revenue opportunity available to Parks to address growth. It is imperative that this opportunity is maximized to recover reasonable costs from new development.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH END NEIGHBORHOODSW Alder Stsw Broadway SE Stark St SW Yamhill St Transit Mall
    NW Glisan St NW Everett St NW Couch St BURNSIDE TAP INTO YOUR SE Sandy Blvd SW Park Ave SOUTH END NEIGHBORHOODSW Alder StSW Broadway SE Stark St SW Yamhill St Transit Mall Light Rail Lines SW 13th MORRISON SW 12th SW Salmon St SW 11th SW 10th SE Morrison St Streetcar Lines SW 6th SW Madison SW 5th SW 4th SW Jefferson St SW 3rd SW 2nd SW Columbia St SW 1st SW Naito Pkwy SW Clay St SW Market St HAWTHORNE SW Mill St Grand Ave Grand SE Water Ave SE Water SE Hawthorne Blvd SW Harrison St Martin Blvd Luther King Jr. SW Lincoln St MARQUAM ANCHORING THE SOUTH END OF DOWNTOWN PORTLAND’S SKYLINE, SE Division St KOIN Tower offers access to arts and culture, urban parks, incredibleSW Harbor Dr dining options, and convenient services. FOOD & DRINK LIFESTYLE & PARKS SERVICES & HOTELS TILIKUM CROSSING 1 Morton’s Steakhouse 14 Oregon Historical Society 26 Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront 2 Potbelly Sandwich Shop 15 Portland State University 27 The Porter Hilton Curio Hotel 3 Oishii Mika Sushi 16 Portland Art Museum 28 Hotel Modera 4 Veritable Quandry 17 Keller Auditorium 29 24 Hour Fitness ROSS ISLAND 5 Raven and Rose 18 Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall 30 FedEx Office 6 Starbucks 19 Bing Lounge 31 Julie Lawrence Yoga Center 7 Luc Lac 20 Keller Fountain Park 32 Kindercare Day Care 8 PSU Food Carts 21 Pettygrove City Park 33 St James Child Development Center 9 Revolucion Coffee House 22 Lovejoy Fountain Park 34 Green Zebra Grocery 10 Higgins 23 Tom McCall Waterfront Park 35 DMV 11 McMenamins Market St Pub 24 Chapman Square 36 AAA Portland Service Center 12 Rogue Hall 25 Eastbank Esplanade 13 Tom’s Bento SW Bond Ave Bond SW SW Moody Ave Moody SW SW Lowell St KOIN TOWER FOR LEASING INFORMATION 222 SW Columbia St.
    [Show full text]