Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Boys and Girls Club

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Boys and Girls Club Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Boys and Girls Club 9330 SE Harold Street Portland, Oregon October 1, 2010 Prepared for Portland Development Commission Portland, Oregon 333 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97204 (503) 542-1080 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROUND 1 WORK PERFORMED 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 USE OF THIS REPORT 6 REFERENCES 8 FIGURES Figure Title 1 Vicinity Map 2 Anomalies and Subsurface Investigation Locations TABLES Table Title 1 Summary of Geophysical Anomaly Exploration 2 Test Pit Analytical Results 3 Soil Boring Analytical Results APPENDICES Appendix Title A Photograph Log B Boring Logs and Geotechnical Hole Reports C Laboratory Analytical Reports 10/1/10 I:\PROJECTS\1095\006\020\FILERM\R\FINAL PHASE II ESA\PHASE II ESA_RPT_FINAL.DOCX LANDAU ASSOCIATES ii INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the findings of a focused Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted for the Lents Boys and Girls Club of Portland located at 9330 SE Harold Street in Portland, Oregon (subject property, Figure 1). The focused Phase II ESA was conducted by Landau Associates for the Portland Development Commission (PDC), based on the statement of work outlined in our scope of work dated July 28, 2010. This report summarizes the field activities conducted during the Phase II ESA and discusses the investigation findings and results. Conclusions based on the findings and recommendations for further action, as appropriate, are also included. BACKGROUND The Phase I ESA performed by Landau Associates (Landau Associates 2010) revealed evidence of two recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property: • Between 1935 and 1970, a gasoline/service station was located on the northeast corner of SE Harold Street and SE 92nd Avenue, directly across SE Harold Street from the subject property. No information regarding the presence or absence of contamination or underground storage tanks (USTs) associated with the historic gasoline/service station was found. Borings along the northern property boundary, across SE Harold Street from the historic gasoline/service station property were recommended to determine that no contamination had impacted the subject property. • Five anomalies were identified during a geophysical survey conducted by Earth Dynamics on the subject property (Figure 2). Each anomaly appeared to be due to the presence of discrete buried objects. Based on historical information, Anomaly D located in the eastern portion of the subject property was identified as a possible heating oil UST. At the request of PDC, a limited geophysical survey of the subject property was conducted by Earth Dynamics using ground penetrating radar (GPR) and time-domain electromagnetic surveys. As part of the survey, GPR was used on the north side of the main building where a storm drainage plan from 2001 indicated that an Oil Tank Access point was located near the northwest corner of the gymnasium. The GPR survey identified a small anomaly; approximately 10 inches in diameter and approximately 18 inches below the sidewalk in this area, but the location did not correspond to the location of the former underground heating oil tank (HOT) based on available blueprints. Earth Dynamics interpreted the anomaly to be a buried piece of debris based on the size and shallow depth, and this area was not considered to be a recognized environmental condition. The purpose of the Phase II ESA was to evaluate the geophysical anomalies, and determine the presence or absence of contamination from the historic gasoline/service station to address the recognized environmental conditions identified in the Phase I ESA. In addition, while not a recognized 10/1/10 I:\PROJECTS\1095\006\020\FILERM\R\FINAL PHASE II ESA\PHASE II ESA_RPT_FINAL.DOCX LANDAU ASSOCIATES 1 environmental condition, PDC asked Landau Associates to advance subsurface borings in the vicinity of the former underground HOT on the north side of the building along SE Harold Street to document soil quality and assess possible impacts from the former underground HOT. The details of the field activities and the results of the sampling are discussed below. WORK PERFORMED The Phase II ESA was conducted by a Landau Associates representative and was completed over the course of two days; one day of test pit explorations and one day of shallow direct-push borings. Below is a summary of the field activities. Test Pits Landau Associates met a representative from C&W Grading at the project site to excavate test pits in the immediate vicinity of the geophysical anomalies (Figure 2) on August 4, 2010. A backhoe was used to excavate to the approximate depth of each anomaly. A summary of the geophysical anomalies, coordinates, and exploration findings can be found in Table 1. A photograph log of the anomalies and test pits has been included as Appendix A. All anomalies were explored and a test pit excavated with the exception of Anomaly C. Anomaly C was not explored for three reasons: 1) children were present on a playground in close proximity to the anomaly, thereby limiting access with an excavator, 2) there was a concern that excavation would damage the stormwater drainage system unnecessarily, and 3) upon closer inspection Anomaly C was determined to be a part of the stormwater drainage system from the roof of the Boys and Girls Club. Based on these observations, it was decided that Anomaly C’s function did not represent an environmental concern for the property. Observations from excavations from the other anomalies are discussed below. Anomaly A is located in the parking lot near the northeast corner of the former Lents little league concession stand was located, approximately 48 feet (ft) south of NE Harold Street, and 75 ft west of the Boys and Girls Club. Below the 4-inch layer of asphalt was an additional 6-inch layer of concrete. The test pit was excavated to a depth of approximately 4 ft below ground surface (BGS) exposing what appeared to be native sandy gravel. Earth Dynamics described the anomaly as approximately 1 ft BGS (Landau Associates 2010), which could have been attributed to rebar in the concrete found immediately beneath that asphalt. No evidence of an anomaly related to a recognized environmental condition was found. Samples were collected from the four side walls and bottom of the test pit and submitted to the lab to be held for composite and further analysis. PDC requested that these samples not be analyzed. Anomaly B is located near second base of the northern most baseball diamond, and approximately 100 ft southwest of the southwestern corner of the recreation center. A metal covered 10/1/10 I:\PROJECTS\1095\006\020\FILERM\R\FINAL PHASE II ESA\PHASE II ESA_RPT_FINAL.DOCX LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2 wooden fire door was found approximately 2.5 ft BGS amongst bricks, old mortar, and ash. Beneath the 3-ft by 7-ft door is a 10-inch layer of blue-colored ash. Below the ash is a concrete slab with 38-inch square scoring marks. Sample TP-B Ash was collected from the ash/soil mixture (predominantly ash) and submitted for polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, and toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) lead analyses. Anomaly D is located on the eastern property boundary (north of the southeast baseball diamond. A hollow metal surface was found 3 ft BGS. The metal surface was cleared to reveal a tank 8 ft long oriented north to south, 3.5 ft wide, and 3.5 ft deep. A fill port on the south end of the top of the tank was accessed and revealed the presence of approximately 6.5 inches of clear product in the tank with a strong petroleum odor resembling kerosene. No soil staining or odor was observed in the soil around the tank. A bent pipe on the north end of the top of the tank may have been the connective piping from the tank to a historic building. Samples TP-D North and TP-D South were collected from approximately 6 inches below the bottom of the tank on end, north and south respectively. Samples were submitted for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis by method NWTPH-HCID. Within the Anomaly D test pit a broken piece of iron pipe was found on the south side of the excavation. The pipe was approximately 3 ft long and did not appear to connect to the tank or anything beyond the edges of the test pit. The pipe was located approximately 3 ft BGS and oriented east to west. Anomaly E is located between first base and the pitcher’s mound of the southeast baseball diamond. The excavation started near first base and uncovered a 4-inch iron pipe approximately 2 ft BGS oriented west to southwest. The eastern end of the pipe is buried in concrete. To the west, approximately 15 ft from the beginning of the trench, the pipe connects to an 8-inch concrete pipe that extends to a depth of approximately 5 ft BGS. The pipe terminates at a dry well approximately 14 ft deep from its opening and is lined with red bricks (see photograph on page A-4 of Appendix A). A hand auger was used to collect a sediment sample from the bottom of the dry well with the consistency of soft, brown silt. The sample collected from the bottom of the dry well was submitted for RCRA metals and TPH-HCID analyses. Shallow Direct-Push Borings Five shallow direct-push borings were advanced to depths ranging between 13 and 15 ft BGS along the northern portion of the property boundary (Figure 2) on August 23, 2010. Drilling services were provided by Cascade Drilling LLP (Cascade Drilling) of Portland, Oregon.
Recommended publications
  • Portland Parks and Recreation
    Portland Parks and Recreation CBO has posted the online, interactive version of the bureau’s performance dashboard here: http://www.portlandoregon.gov/cbo/article/523266 The following questions were asked during the bureau’s budget work session. Responses are included in the attached packet. 1. Please provide a breakdown of scholarships by community center. 2. What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? 3. Did the increase in the value of scholarships granted correspond to the number or participants in the program? Was there an increase in workload or did the cost of the programs go up? 4. List/plans of the following: Five-year major maintenance queue Five-year SDC funded projects Prior five-year SDC fund projects 5. Please provide descriptions and budget amounts for the two new requests: (1) parks rangers expansion and (2) tree code implementation PP&R Council Budget Questions – Follow up from March 17th Budget presentation: 1) Breakdown of scholarships by community center See Attached Scholarship PDF File 2) What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? Rather than close whole facilities or parks when there is inadequate major maintenance funding we reduce levels of service (thin the soup) across the system and we also delay repairs and replacements, thus allowing the risk of failure to increase. Examples are the sewer back up at Sellwood, the sewer failure at Buckman Field House, the emergency culvert failures, etc. The one counter example that resulted a full closure and demolition was the wood play structure at Couch Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads.Gigl.Org.Uk/Website/Parks People and Nature1.Pdf 8 Flores, T
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michelle Lee Talal for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science presented on May 7, 2019 Title: Exploring Urban Parks: Plant Communities, Visitor Experiences, and Manager Perspectives in Portland, Oregon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Mary V. Santelmann Urban parks are biodiversity hotspots within cities and have the potential to provide a range of socio-cultural benefits for people, but may not always meet the needs and desires of park visitors. A variety of land use practices and environmental factors affect urban park biodiversity and vegetation structure, composition, and ecological function, but more studies are needed to compare plant taxonomic composition, biodiversity patterns, and species traits across different types of urban green spaces. Additionally, there is a lack of research that explores park user experiences, vegetation perceptions, and accessibility issues in a range of urban park types interspersed throughout Portland using qualitative methods to observe and interview visitors on-site. More research is also needed that focuses on interviewing park managers about their perspectives on park benefits and management. The findings of my interdisciplinary dissertation may assist managers in their aims to achieve various ecological goals, as well as meet the needs and desires of park visitors within increasingly developed urban areas. The purpose of this research is three-fold, and includes examining: 1) The relationships between plant community composition, biodiversity patterns, environmental variables, and species traits in a range of urban parks in Portland, Oregon; 2) how the vegetation in these urban parks currently meets the needs and desires of visitors; and 3) how park managers currently manage vegetation in the parks to meet the needs and desires of visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • PP Annual Report Exec Summary V4.Indd
    2015–16 Dear Portlanders: Thank you for your recent commitment to repairing and improving Portland’s parks. In November 2014, you and an impressive 74 percent of Portlanders voted “Yes” for the Parks Replacement Bond Projects26 underway — the highest percentage ever for a Parks ballot measure. You became part of a long tradition of Portlanders who’ve built and maintained our city’s enviable collection of park facilities. In this fi rst full year of the Bond, from July 2015 to July 2016, we’ve laid the foundation for the work to be done. In this upcoming year, you’ll start to see tangible results in the parks. Replacement of the 70 to 90 year old mechanical systems at Grant Pool was the fi rst completed project, and next year, results will be visible across the city. Project1 completed About every nine years over the last century, Portlanders have invested in increasing, preserving and maintaining our park system by voting “yes” on parks bonds or levies. Before the 2014 bond, the last major bond was in 1994, meaning 20 years passed without signifi cant park improvements or address- ing dire repair needs. Portland Parks & Recreation anticipates a $248 million funding gap for major maintenance needs over the next 10 years. The $68 million in funds from the 2014 Parks Replacement Bond will not address all of these maintenance issues, but it is vital to fi xing, upgrading and replacing the most crucial of these needs. Projects18 ahead of As your Parks Commissioner and Parks Director, we are making sure the funds will be used wisely and schedule maximize benefi ts to the greatest number of park users.
    [Show full text]
  • PP&R's FY 2021-22 Requested Budget
    Requested Budget FY 2021-22 Portland Parks & Recreation PP&R Staff FY 2021-22 Requested Budget Maximo Behrens, Recreation Services Manager Tonya Booker, Land Stewardship Manager Carmen Rubio, Commissioner-in-charge Jenn Cairo, Urban Forestry Manager Tim Collier, Public Information Manager Adena Long, Director Margaret Evans, Workforce Development Manager Todd Lofgren, Deputy Director Vicente Harrison, Security and Emergency Manager Lauren McGuire, Assets and Development Manager Claudio Campuzano, Manager Kenya Williams, Equity and Inclusion Manager Finance, Property, & Technology Department Kerry Anderson Andre Ashley Don Athey Darryl Brooks Budget Advisory Committee Tamara Burkovskaia Krystin Castro Board Members Riley Clark-Long Paul Agrimis Mara Cogswell Mike Elliott Dale Cook Jenny Glass Terri Davis Juan Piantino Leah Espinoza Paddy Tillett Rachel Felice Bonnie Gee Yosick Joan Hallquist Erin Zollenkopf Erik Harrison Britta Herwig Labor Partners Brett Horner Sadie Atwell, Laborers Local 483 Don Joughin Luis Flores, PCL Brian Landoe Yoko Silk, PTE-17 Robin Laughlin Sara Mayhew-Jenkins Community Representatives Todd Melton Pauline Miranda Jeremy Robbins, Portland Accessibility Advisory Council Soo Pak Andre Middleton, Friends of Noise Dylan Paul Chris Rempel, Native American Community Advisory Council Nancy Roth JR Lilly, East Portland Action Plan Victor Sanders Joe McFerrin, Portland Opportunities Industrialization Center Jamie Sandness Brian Flores Garcia, Youth Durelle Singleton Sabrina Wilson, Rosewood Initiative Chris Silkie Jenny
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
    2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
    [Show full text]
  • About East Portland Neighborhoods Vol
    EAST PORTLAND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION NEWS October 2009 News about East Portland Neighborhoods vol. 14 issue 4 Your NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS Argay pg.pg. pg. pg.5 pg.6 pg. Neighborhood Association 33 4 6 12 Centennial Community Association All about East Portland Glenfair Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Association News … Hazelwood The East Portland in outer East Portland that events, graffiti cleanups, and tribution with positive, far- Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Association make up the EPNO coalition tree plantings. reaching results. News (EPNAN) isn’t a news- (our alliance individual neigh- As you look through our The volunteers of the East Lents paper in the traditional sense. borhoods) – know more paper and see how your Portland Neighbors Inc. Neighborhood Association It wasn’t created to compete about this sanctioned system neighbors are making a real Newspaper Committee thank with community, city or of neighborhood organiza- difference in their neighbor- you for taking a few minutes Mill Park national news outlets – nei- tions, recognized by City gov- hood, perhaps you’ll be to discover more about what Neighborhood Association ther in content nor for adver- ernment. encouraged by their efforts. your neighbors are doing, tisers. So, the stories and photos Then, possibly you’ll decide and how you can help outer Parkrose Heights EPNAN is the way the East you see on the pages inside to take as little as one hour a East Portland be an even Association of Neighbors Portland Neighborhood are about volunteers and month to participate in your nicer place to live when we Organization (EPNO) reach- organizations that are work- neighborhood association work together.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended
    ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended Accept Park System Development Charge Methodology Update Report for implementation, and amend the applicable sections of City Code (Ordinance; amend Code Chapter 17.13) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. Ordinance No. 172614, passed by the Council on August 19, 1998 authorized establishment of a Parks and Recreation System Development Charge(SDC) and created a new City Code Chapter 17.13. 2. In October 1998 the City established a Parks SDC program. City Code required that the program be updated every two years to ensure that program goals were being met. An update was implemented on July 1, 2005 pursuant to Ordinance No. 179008, as amended. The required update reviewed the Parks SDC Program to determine that sufficient money will be available to fund capacity-increasing facilities identified by the Parks SDC-CIP; to determine whether the adopted and indexed SDC rate has kept pace with inflation; to determine whether the Parks SDC-CIP should be modified; and to ensure that SDC receipts will not over-fund such facilities. 3. Ordinance No 175774, passed by the Council on July 12, 2001 adopted The Parks 2020 Vision. This report highlighted significant challenges confronting the City in regards to shoring up our ailing park facilities, eliminating inequity in underserved neighborhoods, and providing a stable source of funding to address not just our existing shortfalls, but to also meet the needs created by new development. The Park SDC is the most significant revenue opportunity available to Parks to address growth. It is imperative that this opportunity is maximized to recover reasonable costs from new development.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File 2019-20
    2019–20 YEAR 5 PARKS BOND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY YEAR 5 Dear Portlanders, We are happy to report that 46 of the 52 Bond projects have been completed, with the remaining six projects underway. Your investment has been used wisely. Year 5 of the Bond started out as planned: • In July 2019, Commissioner Fish cut the ribbon on the completely overhauled Peninsula Pool. • In October 2019, the community gathered to celebrate a more accessible playground at Glenhaven Park. • Construction wrapped up on the installation of new play pieces and drainage repairs at over 30 parks. Sadly, 2020 started off with the loss of our colleague and beloved Parks Commissioner, Nick Fish. And then COVID-19 hit. With some adaptations, Bond projects stayed on track. Construction began on a new playground for Creston Park, and we completed a new playground at Verdell Burdine Rutherford Park, the first Portland park to be named solely after a Black woman. The public health crisis was followed by a groundswell of action for racial justice. Now, our parks and open spaces are even more precious than ever, serving as shared public spaces to exercise our bodies, our minds, and our voices. While this Bond could only tackle the most critical maintenance needs, it has given us all a glimpse of what we can achieve together. Let’s continue to create a more sustainable and more equitable future for our city and our parks. Stay safe, stay healthy, and stay hopeful. Sincerely, Commissioner Amanda Fritz Portland Parks & Recreation Director Adena Long 1 PARKS BOND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY YEAR 5 46Projects completed Glenhaven Park playground opening celebration Projects6 underway Peninsula Pool opening celebration Current3 projects ahead of or on schedule Marshall Park bridge construction 2 PARKS BOND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY YEAR 5 NORTH Acquisitions at Cathedral, Open Meadow.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Park System Development Charge 20-Year Capital Plan (Summary)
    187770 Exhibit A 2016 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funded with Park SDC revenue. The total value of projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), may be modified at any time. Changes to this list will not affect the SDC rates, unless the Council holds a public hearing and authorizes the changes, as provided in ORS 223.309(2). TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: Land acquisition Develop new parks on new land Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc Increase playability, durability and life of facilities Natural area restoration Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities SDC Zone Program Site Project Name % Growth Years 1 - 5 Years 6 - 10 Years 11 -10 Total 20 Years Total * Growth % Central City Acquisitions Central City Unidentified Central City Acquisitions 100% $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Central City Acquisition Placeholder Downtown 100%
    [Show full text]
  • Open Gardens2017
    THE HARDY PLANT SOCIETY OF OREGON OPEN GARDENS2017 gardeners growing together Clematis photo by Merle Dole-Reid INTRODUCTION 2017 Open Garden season is about to begin! Welcome to this year’s directory of approximately 100 listings covering a wide variety of wonderful gardens and nurseries to visit all season. Many gardens will be open on the weekends, and evening openings are on the second and fourth Mondays of June, July, August, and September. The Directory has been prepared by a dedicated committee led by Chair Tom Barreto, assisted by Ruth Clark, Merle Dole-Reid, Jenn Ferrante, Barry Gates, Jim Rondone, Pam Skalicky, Lise Storc, and Bruce Wakefield. Tom is also much appreciated for his beautiful photography which graces the cover this year and to Merle Dole-Reid’s photograph on this page. Special thanks to Linda Wisner for cover design, advice and production direction, and a very big thank you to Bruce Wakefield for his help with a process that is always time consuming; we are very grateful. We have worked hard to assure the accuracy of the listings in the 2017 the Open Gardens Directory, but if you find an error or omission, please contact the HPSO office at 503-224-5718. Corrections will be announced in the HPSO weekly email blasts. New this year, you can now open your garden more spontaneously if your garden looks fantastic that week by sending a message to Bruce at [email protected]. He will redirect you to an Open Garden Committee member who can help you with a garden description and get your notice out in the weekly email to the rest of HPSO.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Getting to Know Lents: a Thematic Atlas Of
    Getting to Know LentsGetting to Know Lents: A Thematic Atlas of HealthyA Thematic EatingAtlas of Healthy and Eating Active and Active Living Living Getting to Know Lents A Thematic Atlas of Healthy Eating and Active Living Getting to Know Lents: A Thematic Atlas of Healthy Eating and Active Living Getting to Know Lents A Thematic Atlas of Healthy Eating and Active Living Acknowledgements This project was made possible by Portland State University spring and summer capstone students 2008 in conjunction with Community Health Partnership: Oregon’s Public Health Institute. Spring 2008 Capstone Summer 2008 Capstone Community Partners Allison Adcox Ben Blessing 1000 Friends of Oregon Oregon Coalition for Marina Carter Preston Brookfield Active Living by Design Promoting Physical Allen Davis Valerie DePan American Heart Association Activity Jonathan Gray Sarah Egan Bureau of Planning Portland Development Devon Kelley Rory Hammock Coalition for a Livable Commission Lyn Kirby Brandon Jones Future Portland Office of Yu-Ching Liu Nick Jones Community Health Transportation Meg Merrick Troy Kenyon Partnership Portland Parks and Nick Nicholson James Kerridge Growing Gardens Recreation Steven Zach Owen Meg Merrick Kelly Elementary SUN Portland State University Blake Shepard Derrak Richard Program Portland/Multnomah Food Simon Skiles Michael Russell Lents Food Group Council Blia Xiong Hiroko Segawa Lents Neighborhood Robert Wood Johnson Blair Whiteman Association Foundation Marshall High School Wattles Boys and Girls Club Northwest Health Zenger Farm Foundation Getting to Know Lents A Thematic Atlas of Healthy Eating and Active Living Contents Mission Statement Acknowledgements ........................................................................ 4 Created through a lens of healthy eating and active Background on Community Health ............................................. 6 Why Place (Lents) Matters: Building a Movement for living, this atlas is intended to describe the historical Healthy Communities ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Exhibit a February 13, 2008 Page 1 of 177
    Board Resolution 6558 - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Exhibit A February 13, 2008 Page 1 of 177 Investing in Portland’s Future Exhibit A Page 2 of 177 On the Cover: Board Resolution 6558 - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report February 13, 2008 UNDER THE AUTUMN MOON FESTIVAL 2006 Culminating a planning process that began December 2005, the Portland Develop- ment Commisison (PDC) spearheaded an effort in September 2006 to celebrate the $5.3 million in streetscape improvements in Old Town/Chinatown (OTCT). More than 35,000 people attended the two and a half-day public event, called “Under the Autumn Moon.” The festivities kicked off Friday evening , September 29, with a ribbon cutting on NW Davis Street. A full day of activities and events began Saturday, September 30, with a parade (including grand marshal Mayor Tom Potter), two non-stop music stages, food booths, cooking demonstrations, a glob- al bazaar, tours of the district, an outdoor movie and a fireworks display. Events continued on Sunday, October 1, when the Chinese Classical Garden was open for free all day. Restaurants and businesses in OTCT participated by inviting crowds in to sample foods and wares. Many of the restaurants were packed throughout the event. Many people attending were from the Chinese community, some of whom had not been in Old Town/Chinatown for years. We hope this will be the first of many such events on the new festival streets and that those who attended the Under the Autumn Moon Festival will return often. The vision for the streetscape improvements was to strengthen the identity of the historic district, foster cultural and economic diversity, and promote a vibrant pe- destrian environment for commercial, retail and residential uses.
    [Show full text]