DOCSLIB.ORG

Researchcommons.Waikato.Ac.Nz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Researchcommons.Waikato.Ac.Nz http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Geophysical characterisation of the Onewhero and Kellyville volcanic complexes, South Auckland Volcanic Field A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Earth and Ocean Sciences at The University of Waikato by Kevin Joseph Chase Mullane _________ The University of Waikato 2015 Abstract The Quaternary-aged (1.59 – 0.51 Ma) intraplate, monogenetic, basaltic South Auckland Volcanic Field consists of at least 82 volcanic centres that span an area of 300 km². This study focusses on the volcanic and sedimentary histories of the Onewhero and Kellyville maars, interpreted from additional geological observations, which build upon previous geological studies, and gravimetric and magnetic surveys. New geological observations of the Onewhero maar reveal the presence of diatomaceous sediment, and at least one lava flow, that probably originated from the nearby Klondyke cone to the south, and which occupies a significant area of the crater floor. A geological investigation of the Kellyville maar reveals a crater that has been partially filled by a thick accumulation of basalt and scoria and overlain by Karapiro Formation sediments and diatomite. Available borehole stratigraphy suggests that the Glass Hill basalt cone present in the Kellyville maar was an early- stage volcanic product rather than a late-stage product as previously thought. Gravimetric surveys in the Onewhero and Kellyville maars revealed contrasting crater fill deposits. Raw gravity data was acquired in the field, corrected for drift and then reduced to a Bouguer anomaly. The Onewhero maar is characterised by an anomaly of -5.8 mGal that has a concave profile. The post-eruption geological body present at Onewhero is two-dimensionally modelled with a density of 1.3 g/cm³, and has a maximum thickness of 100 m in the northwest of the crater. The Kellyville maar is characterised by an anomaly of +2.5 mGal that has a convex profile. The dominant geological body present in the crater is a lava-lake deposit that is two-dimensionally modelled with a density of 2.9 g/cm³, and has a maximum thickness of 60 m. The total magnetic field strength of the Onewhero and Kellyville maars was recorded with a proton magnetometer and the values were mapped in ArcMap. In the Onewhero maar, two subdued anomalies were outliers. A positive magnetic anomaly (213 nT) with a broad crescent shape was identified in the middle of the crater and interpreted to be either an extrusive feeder dyke or an accumulation of highly magnetic volcanic sediment deposited in a topographic trough. A circular negative anomaly (-1057 nT) in the northwest of the crater is an accumulation of lake sediment with a low magnetic susceptibility. In the Kellyville maar, two contrasting anomalies were observed. The strongly positive anomaly (1275 nT) corresponds to the geographical position of Glass Hill, a basaltic cone. A strong negative anomaly (-3315 nT) in the middle of the crater corresponds to a known deposit of diatomite. i Overall, the structure of the Onewhero maar, as inferred by this investigation, is similar to many other maars globally and its sedimentary fill is remarkably similar to the Dottingen maar in Germany. The Kellyville maar has a more unique structure but can be compared to the Domain maar in the nearby Auckland Volcanic Field. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Adrian Pittari, Beth Fox, and Andrew Gorman, for without them this study would not have been possible. Adrian, you anchored this project and provided the patience and personality that was needed to keep this ship afloat. Beth, you provided valuable information, and your extra knowledge was crucial. Without the support of the University of Otago, I would have been without equipment, so thank you Andrew. Thank you to the rest of the staff in the Earth and Ocean Sciences department at the University of Waikato who all provided snippets of advice and inspired a love of the sciences throughout my years at university. I am especially grateful to the landowners in Onewhero and Mercer who were all very approachable. Their generosity in allowing me to roam around their farms and borrow equipment should I need it ensured that I could gain full access to my field areas. Thank you to Nelson and the Black family from Mercer and the Green, Shakeshaft, Bovill, and Pellowe families from Onewhero. I am very appreciative of funding received from the Broad Memorial Fund and internal University of Waikato research funds held by Adrian Pittari. Cheers to the volcanology office crew (of which George is an honorary member) for the distractions and endless NBA procrastination (Billy). To my family, thank you for instilling and nurturing in me a love for the natural world and for always being supportive of my endeavours. Lastly to my field-helper Fiona, without your optimism, laughs and high-level off road skills we would never have made it through the fieldwork alive. Long live the Pokeno ice-cream trips. iii iv Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... iii Table of Contents .............................................................................................. v List of Figures ................................................................................................... xi List of Tables ................................................................................................... xv Chapter One: Introduction .............................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Study area ................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Chapter outlines .......................................................................................... 3 Chapter Two: Formation and structure of maar volcanoes ......................... 5 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Maar crater or tuff ring? ............................................................................. 8 2.3 Geophysical case studies ............................................................................ 9 2.4 North Island intraplate volcanism ............................................................. 11 2.5 South Auckland Volcanic Field ................................................................ 12 2.6 Country rock geology ............................................................................... 14 2.7 Controls on volcanism .............................................................................. 17 2.8 Eruption controls ...................................................................................... 17 2.9 Previous work: Kellyville Volcanic Complex .......................................... 18 2.10 Previous work: Onewhero Volcanic Complex ......................................... 19 Chapter Three: Geology of the Onewhero and Kellyville complexes ........ 21 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 21 3.2 Geology of the Onewhero region ............................................................. 21 3.2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 21 v 3.2.2 Country rock geology .......................................................................... 22 3.2.3 Volcanic geology................................................................................. 23 3.2.4 Borehole interpretation ........................................................................ 24 3.2.5 Onewhero crater post-eruption fill ...................................................... 30 3.2.6 Onewhero crater lava flow .................................................................. 31 3.2.7 Updated geological map ...................................................................... 33 3.3 Geology of the Mercer region .................................................................. 34 3.3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 34 3.3.2 Country rock geology .......................................................................... 35 3.3.3 Volcanic geology................................................................................. 36 3.3.4 Borehole interpretation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By Douglas P. Klein with Plates by G.A. Abrams and P.L. Hill U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado
    U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STRUCTURE OF THE BASINS AND RANGES, SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO, AN INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTIONS by Douglas P. Klein with plates by G.A. Abrams and P.L. Hill U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado Open-file Report 95-506 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. The use of trade, product, or firm names in this papers is for descriptive purposes only, and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. STRUCTURE OF THE BASINS AND RANGES, SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO, AN INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTIONS by Douglas P. Klein CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 DEEP SEISMIC CRUSTAL STUDIES .................................. 4 SEISMIC REFRACTION DATA ....................................... 7 RELIABILITY OF VELOCITY STRUCTURE ............................. 9 CHARACTER OF THE SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTION ..................... 13 DRILL HOLE DATA ............................................... 16 BASIN DEPOSITS AND BEDROCK STRUCTURE .......................... 20 Line 1 - Playas Valley ................................... 21 Cowboy Rim caldera .................................. 23 Valley floor ........................................ 24 Line 2 - San Luis Valley through the Alamo Hueco Mountains ....................................... 25 San Luis Valley ..................................... 26 San Luis and Whitewater Mountains ................... 26 Southern
    [Show full text]
  • Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History
    Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Scenic Trips to the Geologic Past Series: No. 1—SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO No. 2—TAOS—RED RIVER—EAGLE NEST, NEW MEXICO, CIRCLE DRIVE No. 3—ROSWELL—CAPITAN—RUIDOSO AND BOTTOMLESS LAKES STATE PARK, NEW MEXICO No. 4—SOUTHERN ZUNI MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO No. 5—SILVER CITY—SANTA RITA—HURLEY, NEW MEXICO No. 6—TRAIL GUIDE TO THE UPPER PECOS, NEW MEXICO No. 7—HIGH PLAINS NORTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO, RATON- CAPULIN MOUNTAIN—CLAYTON No. 8—MOSlAC OF NEW MEXICO'S SCENERY, ROCKS, AND HISTORY No. 9—ALBUQUERQUE—ITS MOUNTAINS, VALLEYS, WATER, AND VOLCANOES No. 10—SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO No. 11—CUMBRE,S AND TOLTEC SCENIC RAILROAD C O V E R : REDONDO PEAK, FROM JEMEZ CANYON (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by John Whiteside) Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by Robert W . Talbott) WHITEWATER CANYON NEAR GLENWOOD SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, a n d History edited by PAIGE W. CHRISTIANSEN and FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1972 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY STIRLING A. COLGATE, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI, Director BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed William G. Abbott, President, 1961-1979, Hobbs George A. Cowan, 1972-1975, Los Alamos Dave Rice, 1972-1977, Carlsbad Steve Torres, 1967-1979, Socorro James R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014–2015 Annual Report
    OTAGO MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT 2014–2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chairperson’s Foreword 3 Director’s Review of the Year 3 Otago Museum Trust Board 4 Māori Advisory Committee 5 Honorary Curators 5 Association of Friends of the Otago Museum 5 Acknowledgements 6 Otago Museum Staff 7 Goal One: A World-class Collection 10 Goal Two: Engaging Our Community 15 Goal Three: Business Sustainability 21 Goal Four: An Outward-looking and Inclusive Culture 23 Giving Back 25 Appendix A: Statement of Service Performance 26 Appendix B: Financial Statements 57 Appendix C: Independent Auditor’s Report 92 2 CHAIRPERSON’S FOREWORD OTAGO MUSEUM TRUST BOARD completed reorganisations within our teams December 2015 is very exciting. It marks to reflect our key areas of focus. We have the start of a major advance in our ability continued to invest in highly-skilled staff to to connect with our communities. This empower these areas. Our financial results development comes on the back of several reflect a successful balance of investment very successful exhibitions staged this year. and sensible management, allowing The great thing about these exhibitions has investment in our key development areas. been the use of our own collection and the leadership and creativity shown by our staff As an institution, we have worked hard at in bringing them to life. building partnership relationships with a large number of organisations. This report I would like to reflect my thanks for the work It is my pleasure as Chairperson to report demonstrates the success of these efforts of the management team and all staff at on behalf of the Board on another very and positions the Museum strongly for future the Otago Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Hypotheses Regarding the Miocene–Holocene Jemez Lineament, New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado Fraser Goff and Shari A
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: https://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/72 Facts and hypotheses regarding the Miocene–Holocene Jemez Lineament, New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado Fraser Goff and Shari A. Kelley, 2021, pp. 101-116 in: Geology of the Mount Taylor area, Frey, Bonnie A.; Kelley, Shari A.; Zeigler, Kate E.; McLemore, Virginia T.; Goff, Fraser; Ulmer-Scholle, Dana S., New Mexico Geological Society 72nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 310 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2021 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, Color Plates, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Food Story the Pukekohe Hub Prepared For
    Paerata Patumahoe Mauku Pukekohe Puni Pokeno Tuakau Aka Aka Te ohanga newhero Pukekawa New Zealand’s Food Story The Pukekohe Hub Prepared for Horticulture New Zealand August 2018 Foreword Horticulture is one of the success stories of New Zealand’s primary industries. In 2017, the industry generated $5.68 billion in value. Export revenue has grown nearly 50% in five years, illustrating the trust the world places in New Zealand-grown food, and the country’s ability to meet that demand. But the industry cannot rest. New Zealand faces opportunities with a growing population and the need to grow fresh produce. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Auckland, and its surrounding rural land. The population is set to rise to 2.3 million by 2043, straining natural resources and infrastructure. And growers are feeling that pressure. The Pukekohe growing hub straddles the Auckland and Waikato District boundaries, and it is key to sustaining the fresh food supply to the country’s largest city. The squeeze on prime growing land in the Pukekohe hub, access to water, and the tensions between the existing industry and new neighbourhoods all mean a more considered and concerted approach to planning is needed. It is the right time to start the conversation about New Zealand’s sustainable food supply with a focus on a growing area experiencing change. Our economic analysis suggests that, over the next 25 years, the Pukekohe hub could face constrained horticulture production. If left unchecked, less production could result in lost economic value, higher prices for customers, and job losses for the industry itself and the sectors it supports.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Forest Service Southwestern Region Coronado National Forest July 2017 Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Bowie National Historic Site Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Bowie National Historic Site Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2011/443 ON THE COVER The ruins of the second Fort Bowie near the base of Bowie Peak. National Park Service photograph by Karen Gonzales. THIS PAGE The doorway of the cavalry barracks frames the American flag flying to the west. Note the local stones used in the construction of the building and the lime plaster used to cover the walls. National Park Service photograph. Photographs available online: http://www.nps.gov/fobo/ photosmultimedia/photogallery.htm Fort Bowie National Historic Site Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2011/443 National Park Service Geologic Resources Division PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 September 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abajo Mountains, 382, 388 Amargosa River, 285, 309, 311, 322, Arkansas River, 443, 456, 461, 515, Abort Lake, 283 337, 341, 342 516, 521, 540, 541, 550, 556, Abies, 21, 25 Amarillo, Texas, 482 559, 560, 561 Abra, 587 Amarillo-Wichita uplift, 504, 507, Arkansas River valley, 512, 531, 540 Absaroka Range, 409 508 Arlington volcanic field, 358 Acer, 21, 23, 24 Amasas Back, 387 Aromas dune field, 181 Acoma-Zuni scction, 374, 379, 391 Ambrose tenace, 522, 523 Aromas Red Sand, 180 stream evolution patterns, 391 Ambrosia, 21, 24 Arroyo Colorado, 395 Aden Crater, 368 American Falls Lava Beds, 275, 276 Arroyo Seco unit, 176 Afton Canyon, 334, 341 American Falls Reservoir, 275, 276 Artemisia, 21, 24 Afton interglacial age, 29 American River, 36, 165, 173 Ascension Parish, Louisana, 567 aggradation, 167, 176, 182, 226, 237, amino acid ash, 81, 118, 134, 244, 430 323, 336, 355, 357, 390, 413, geochronology, 65, 68 basaltic, 85 443, 451, 552, 613 ratios, 65 beds, 127,129 glaciofluvial, 423 aminostratigraphy, 66 clays, 451 Piedmont, 345 Amity area, 162 clouds, 95 aggregate, 181 Anadara, 587 flows, 75, 121 discharge, 277 Anastasia Formation, 602, 642, 647 layer, 10, 117 Agua Fria Peak area, 489 Anastasia Island, 602 rhyolitic, 170 Agua Fria River, 357 Anchor Silt, 188, 198, 199 volcanic, 54, 85, 98, 117, 129, Airport bench, 421, 423 Anderson coal, 448 243, 276, 295, 396, 409, 412, Alabama coastal plain, 594 Anderson Pond, 617, 618 509, 520 Alamosa Basin, 366 andesite, 75, 80, 489 Ash Flat, 364 Alamosa
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato River Water Take Proposal
    WAIKATO RIVER WATER TAKE PROPOSAL Lower Waikato River Bathymetry Assessment Changes Consequent to Development for Watercare Services Ltd December 2020 R.J.Keller & Associates PO Box 2003, Edithvale, VIC 3196 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 8 2.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 “NATURAL” VARIABILITY IN FLOW RATES ........................................................................................ 8 2.3 HISTORICAL CHANGES IN BATHYMETRY ........................................................................................... 9 2.4 HYDRO DAM DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................ 9 2.5 SAND EXTRACTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.6 LOWER WAIKATO FLOOD PROTECTION ......................................................................................... 10 2.7 LAND USE CHANGES ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wai 898, A031.Pdf
    THE AUTHOR Helen Robinson has worked as a Research Analyst / Inquiry Facilitator at the Waitangi Tribunal Unit since April 2009. Prior to her commission for this report, she wrote two non- commissioned reports as support work for researchers working on the Rohe Pōtae district inquiry. She has a PhD in history from the University of Auckland and has had several articles published in academic journals in New Zealand and overseas, the most recent being ‘Simple Nullity or Birth of Law and Order? The Treaty of Waitangi in Legal and Historiographical Discourse from 1877 to 1970’ in the December 2010 issue of the New Zealand Universities Law Review. ii CONTENTS THE AUTHOR ........................................................................................................................ II CONTENTS........................................................................................................................... III LIST OF MAPS .................................................................................................................................................... VII LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................... VII LIST OF GRAPHS ...............................................................................................................................................VIII ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... XI INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Miocene Fossils Reveal Ancient Roots for New Zealand’S Endemic Mystacina (Chiroptera) and Its Rainforest Habitat
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Miocene Fossils Reveal Ancient Roots for New Zealand’s Endemic Mystacina (Chiroptera) and Its Rainforest Habitat Suzanne J. Hand1*, Daphne E. Lee2, Trevor H. Worthy3, Michael Archer1, Jennifer P. Worthy3, Alan J. D. Tennyson4, Steven W. Salisbury5, R. Paul Scofield6, Dallas C. Mildenhall7, Elizabeth M. Kennedy7, Jon K. Lindqvist2 1 School of Biological, Environmental and Earth Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2 Department of Geology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 3 School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 4 Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, New Zealand, 5 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 6 Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Avenue, Christchurch, New Zealand, a11111 7 GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS The New Zealand endemic bat family Mystacinidae comprises just two Recent species re- ferred to a single genus, Mystacina. The family was once more diverse and widespread, Citation: Hand SJ, Lee DE, Worthy TH, Archer M, with an additional six extinct taxa recorded from Australia and New Zealand. Here, a new Worthy JP, Tennyson AJD, et al. (2015) Miocene Fossils Reveal Ancient Roots for New Zealand’s mystacinid is described from the early Miocene (19–16 Ma) St Bathans Fauna of Central Endemic Mystacina (Chiroptera) and Its Rainforest Otago, South Island, New Zealand. It is the first pre-Pleistocene record of the modern Habitat. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0128871. doi:10.1371/ genus and it extends the evolutionary history of Mystacina back at least 16 million years.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Number 72 May 2014
    Newsletter Number 72 May 2014 BSO Meetings and Field Trips Saturday 7th June 9 am Field Trip to Tavora Reserve We’ll look at the sand dune of the Tavora Reserve. This was marram-dominated, but the Yellow- eyed Penguin Trust has been planting pikao and other native dune species which has worked quite well. We’ll look at the podocarp / broadleaved forest of Goodwood Scenic Reserve, one of the very best remaining remnants of coastal forest in East Otago. The Trust has also been doing restoration planting along the stream that leads to the dunes and along a corridor from Goodwood reserve to the sea. Leave 9 am from the Botany Department car park, return mid-late afternoon. Rain date Sunday at 12 noon. Contact Bastow Wilson, phone: 472 8999 or 021 144 8228, email: [email protected] Wednesday 11th June 5.20 pm Fabulous Fungi from Golden Bay (NOTE DATE CHANGE) Dr David Orlovich, Botany Department, University of Otago, will be talking about the 2014 Fungal Foray that was held in May at Pohara, Golden Bay. The annual Fungal Foray always produces some interesting finds and the photos alone make attending this talk worthwhile. Wednesday 9th July 5.20 pm Larapinta Trail, Central Australia Last winter John and Marilyn Barkla walked the 230 km Larapinta Trail in the desert of Central Australia. It was a place of stunning landscapes, botanical surprises, scarce water and strange encounters with dingoes and scorpions. Come and hear how the journey unfolded and help John put names to the many unfamiliar plants they found.
    [Show full text]