DOCSLIB.ORG

Waikato River Water Take Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waikato River Water Take Proposal WAIKATO RIVER WATER TAKE PROPOSAL Lower Waikato River Bathymetry Assessment Changes Consequent to Development for Watercare Services Ltd December 2020 R.J.Keller & Associates PO Box 2003, Edithvale, VIC 3196 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 8 2.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 “NATURAL” VARIABILITY IN FLOW RATES ........................................................................................ 8 2.3 HISTORICAL CHANGES IN BATHYMETRY ........................................................................................... 9 2.4 HYDRO DAM DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................ 9 2.5 SAND EXTRACTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.6 LOWER WAIKATO FLOOD PROTECTION ......................................................................................... 10 2.7 LAND USE CHANGES ................................................................................................................. 10 2.8 SEDIMENT REMOVAL THROUGH ADDITIONAL WATER TAKE .............................................................. 11 2.9 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................................... 11 3. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE WAIKATO RIVER ............................................................... 12 4. “NATURAL” VARIABILITY IN FLOW RATES IN LOWER WAIKATO RIVER.................................... 15 4.1 ANALYSIS OF FLOW RECORDS BETWEEN 1963 AND 2020 ............................................................... 15 4.2 FUTURE TRENDS ....................................................................................................................... 18 5. HISTORICAL CHANGES IN BATHYMETRY IN THE LOWER WAIKATO ......................................... 23 5.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 23 5.2 BATHYMETRY CHANGES AND ANALYSIS IN MOBILE BED RIVERS ......................................................... 23 5.3 LOWER WAIKATO RIVER - AVAILABLE DATA................................................................................... 28 5.4 ANALYSIS OF LOWER WAIKATO RIVER DATA .................................................................................. 28 5.5 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................ 29 6. HYDRO DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................... 31 6.1 THE HYDRO DAMS .................................................................................................................... 31 6.2 EFFECT OF THE HYDRO DAMS ON RIVER MORPHOLOGY ................................................................... 32 7. SAND EXTRACTION ................................................................................................................. 33 7.1 AVAILABLE DATA ...................................................................................................................... 33 7.2 EFFECT OF SAND EXTRACTION ON BATHYMETRY ............................................................................. 36 7.2.1 Mercer Extraction and Downstream Mean Relative Depth ............................................ 36 7.2.2 Tuakau Extraction and Downstream Mean Relative Depth............................................ 37 7.2.3 Tuakau and Puni Extraction and Upstream Mean Relative Depth ................................. 38 7.2.4 Pukekawa Extraction and Upstream and Downstream Mean Relative Depth ............... 40 7.2.5 Pukekawa Sand Extraction Effect on Local Bathymetry ................................................. 41 7.2.6 General Discussion .......................................................................................................... 45 8 LOWER WAIKATO FLOOD PROTECTION .................................................................................. 46 Page 2 of 110 8.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 46 8.2 LOWER WAIKATO FLOOD PROTECTION SCHEME DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 46 8.3 INFLUENCE OF LOWER WAIKATO FLOOD PROTECTION SCHEME ON WATER LEVELS AND BED LEVELS ........ 48 9 LAND USE CHANGES ............................................................................................................... 49 9.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 49 9.2 EFFECT ON RIVER FLOWS ........................................................................................................... 49 9.3 EFFECT ON SEDIMENT YIELD ....................................................................................................... 50 10 SEDIMENT REMOVAL THROUGH ADDITIONAL WATER TAKE................................................... 51 11 EFFECT OF PROPOSED ADDITIONAL WATER TAKE IN CONTEXT ............................................... 52 12 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 56 APPENDIX A – GRAPHS OF X-SECTION PROFILES AND CHANGES IN MEAN RELATIVE DEPTH ............ 58 APPENDIX B – DETAILED GRAPHS OF X-SECTION PROFILES, CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA AND CHANGES IN MEAN RELATIVE DEPTH LOCAL TO PUKEKAWA SAND EXTRACTION ZONE ....................................... 93 Page 3 of 110 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This review has examined those changes that may actually be occurring in the Lower Waikato River as a consequence of development, and what the river may look like in the future. Within this context, the effect of the proposed additional water take of up to 150,000 m3/d net is examined. A number of review elements evolved as being important to understanding how development has affected the hydrology and bathymetry of the Waikato River and how these may continue to be affected into the future. These elements include “natural” variability in flow rates, historical changes in bathymetry, hydro development, sand extraction, flood protection, and land use changes. The proposed take has been considered in the context of each type of development, and also cumulatively in the context of all types of development together. In reviewing the changes that have occurred within the Lower Waikato River, it is clear that the impact of the proposed 150,000 m3/d water take at the Watercare intake site is negligible within the context of both individual and cumulative development changes that have occurred and will continue into the future. Page 4 of 110 1. INTRODUCTION Watercare Services Limited (“Watercare”) is a lifeline utility providing water and wastewater services to a population of 1.7 million people in Auckland. Its services are vital for life, keep people safe and help communities to flourish. More specifically, Watercare is the council-controlled organisation of Auckland Council responsible for municipal water supply within Auckland, and the provider of bulk water supply services to Pokeno and Tuakau in the Waikato District1. Watercare supplies approximately 440,000 cubic metres of water per day (“m3/day”) on average across the year, derived from a range of sources and treated to the Ministry of Health Drinking Water Standards for New Zealand 2005 (revised 2018). Watercare’s three main water supply sources are:2 • Water storage lakes in the Hūnua and Waitākere ranges; • A groundwater aquifer in Onehunga; and • The Waikato River. The exact proportion supplied from each source varies daily, depending on a range of factors including the levels in the storage lakes, forecast rainfall, treatment plant capacity, and maintenance requirements. In December 2013, Watercare applied to the Waikato Regional Council (“WRC”) for resource consents to authorise abstracting an additional 200,000 m3/day of water from the Waikato River, a new water intake structure and discharges from a new water treatment plant. Since that time, Watercare’s water take application (and the associated applications) have been on hold while the WRC processes and determines other applications to take water from the Waikato River Catchment that were lodged before Watercare’s application. During the period from late 2019 through to mid-2020, the Auckland region experienced one of the most extreme drought events in modern times with rainfall for the period between January and May 2020 being approximately 30% of what would normally be expected for that period. At Watercare’s recommendation, in May 2020 Auckland Council imposed water use restrictions in Auckland for the first time since the early 1990s. Watercare also took additional steps to improve security of supply during the drought by exercising emergency powers under section 330 of the 1 Under a bulk supply agreement with Waikato District.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rowing Australia Annual Report 2011-12
    Rowing Australia Annual Report 2011–2012 Rowing Rowing Australia Office Address: 21 Alexandrina Drive, Yarralumla ACT 2600 Postal Address: PO Box 7147, Yarralumla ACT 2600 Phone: (02) 6214 7526 Rowing Australia Fax: (02) 6281 3910 Website: www.rowingaustralia.com.au Annual Report 2011–2012 Winning PartnershiP The Australian Sports Commission proudly supports Rowing Australia The Australian Sports Commission Rowing Australia is one of many is the Australian Government national sporting organisations agency that develops, supports that has formed a winning and invests in sport at all levels in partnership with the Australian Australia. Rowing Australia has Sports Commission to develop its worked closely with the Australian sport in Australia. Sports Commission to develop rowing from community participation to high-level performance. AUSTRALIAN SPORTS COMMISSION www.ausport.gov.au Rowing Australia Annual Report 2011– 2012 In appreciation Rowing Australia would like to thank the following partners and sponsors for the continued support they provide to rowing: Partners Australian Sports Commission Australian Olympic Committee State Associations and affiliated clubs Australian Institute of Sport National Elite Sports Council comprising State Institutes/Academies of Sport Corporate Sponsors 2XU Singapore Airlines Croker Oars Sykes Racing Corporate Supporters & Suppliers Australian Ambulance Service The JRT Partnership contentgroup Designer Paintworks/The Regatta Shop Giant Bikes ICONPHOTO Media Monitors Stage & Screen Travel Services VJ Ryan
    [Show full text]
  • 12 GEO V 1921 No 64 Waikato and King-Country Counties
    604 1~21, No. 64.J Waikato and King-country Oounties. [12 GEO. V. New Zealand. Title. ANALYSIS. 1. Short Title and commencement. 10. Boundaries of Raglan County altered. 2. Act deemed to be a special Act. 11. Boundaries of Waikato County altered. 3. Otorohanga County constituted. 12. Boundaries of Piako County altered. 4. Taumarunui County constituted. 13. Boundaries of Waipa County altered. 5. Application of Counties Act, 1920. 14. Taupo East and Taupo West Counties united. 6. Awakino and Waitomo Counties abolished, and 15. Road districts abolished. Waitomo County constituted. 16. Taupo Road District constituted. 7. Antecedent liabilities of Awakino and Wal­ 17. Application of provisions of Counties Act, 1920, tomo County C,ouncils to be antecedent in respect of alterations of boundaries. liability of new Waitomo County. 18. Temporary provision for control of certain 8. System ,of rating in Waitomo County. districts. 9. Boundaries of Kawhia County altered. Schedules. 1921-22, No. 64 . Title .AN ACT to give Effect to the Report of the Commission appointed under Section Ninety-one of the Reserves and other Lands Disposal and Public Bodies Empowering Act, 1920. [11th February, 1922. BE IT ENACTED by the General Assembly of New Zealand in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows :- Short Title and 1. This Act may be cited as the Waikato and King-country commencement. Counties Act, 1921-22, and shall come into operation on the :o/st day of April, nineteen hundred and twenty-two. Act deemed to be a 2. This Act shall be deemed to be a special Act within the special Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Iwi Involvement in River Clean-Up Projects
    DECEMBER 2018 A newsletter from the Strong iwi involvement in MESSAGE FROM river clean-up projects THE CE It has been a busy end of year for THE WAIKATO RIVER AUTHORITY HAS ANNOUNCED $6 MILLION FOR RIVER the WRA. We completed our 8th CLEAN-UP PROJECTS IN ITS JUST COMPLETED FUNDING ROUND, WITH MORE funding round and it was great to THAN A THIRD OF THESE PROJECTS BEING IWI LED. see projects successfully lifted from the Restoration Strategy Overall, a total of 38 projects have been The largest project to be funded this year that Environment Minister funded in 2018. is a continuation of the Waipā Catchment Parker launched earlier this year. Authority Co-chairs Hon John Luxton and Plan implementation which will involve Our advocacy for the Vision & Roger Pikia, say a feature of the funding working with approximately 70 farmers Strategy has been pursued across round has been a close alignment with the and landowners within identified priority a number of fora. We held our Restoration Strategy for the Waikato and catchments. The $1.6 million of funding AGM on the back of publishing Waipā rivers and the strong participation will work towards reducing sediment our 2017/18 Annual Report. We of River Iwi. levels going into the Waipā River and its have also received positive media tributaries. Sediment from the Waipā “In recent years there has been a clear coverage across several articles River is a major factor in reducing the trend for successful projects to reflect in as many weeks. One of these water quality in the lower Waikato River.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report
    The Adare Limited Company Limited Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report 17 May 2018 Prepared by Awa Environmental Limited for The Adare Company Limited The Adare Limited Company Limited Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report Project No. J000098 Document title Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report Document number 03 Version number 03 Date 17 May 2018 Project manager Craig Martell Author TonyTrueman Awa Environmental Limited 115 Tory Street, Te Aro, Wellington 6011, Phone:+64 04 455 0990 www.awa.kiwi Document History Version Date Description Author Reviewed 1 02/11/2017 Review TonyTrueman Craig Martell 2 29/03/2018 Preliminary Issue Tony Trueman Tony Trueman 3 17/05/2018 Review Tony Trueman Tony Trueman COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Awa Environmental Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of constitutes an infringement of copyright. iii The Adare Limited Company Limited Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. iv 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 1% AEP River Flooding Assessment ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 1% AEP Flood Hazard Extent ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecohydrological Characterisation of Whangamarino Wetland
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. ECOHYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISATION OF WHANGAMARINO WETLAND A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Earth Sciences at The University of Waikato By JAMES MITCHELL BLYTH The University of Waikato 2011 Abstract The Whangamarino wetland is internationally recognised and one of the most important lowland wetland ecosystems in the Waikato Region. The wetland‟s hydrology has been altered by reduced river base levels, the installation of a weir to raise minimum water levels and the Lower Waikato Waipa Flood Control Scheme, which is linked via the (hypertrophic) Lake Waikare and affected by varying catchment land use practices. When water levels exceed capacity, the overflow is released into the Whangamarino wetland, which also receives flood waters from Whangamarino River. Water levels in the wetland are also affected at high stage, by a control structure near Meremere at the confluence of Waikato and Whangamarino Rivers, and at low stage by a weir a short distance upstream.
    [Show full text]
  • CANOEING INTERNATIONAL Edito-Sommaire 26/12/06 19:14 Page 5
    Edito-Sommaire 26/12/06 19:14 Page 4 Table of contents P.3 EDITORIAL P.26-67 EVENTS 2006-2007 World Championships 2006..........................p.27-51 P.6-19 NEWS AND ACTUALITY • Flatwater Racing in Szeged (HUN) P.20-25 PORTFOLIO • Report Chairman Flatwater Racing Committee • Slalom Racing in Prague (CZE) • Slalom Racing Juniors in Solkan (SLO) • Wildwater Racing in Karlovy Vary (CZE) • Marathon Racing in Tremolat (FRA) • Report Chairman Marathon Racing Committee • Canoe Polo in Amsterdam (NED) • Dragonboat Racing in Kaohsiung (TPE) World Championships 2007..........................p.52-65 • Flatwater Racing in Duisburg (GER • Flatwater Racing Junior in Racice (CZE) • Slalom Racing in Foz d’Iguassu (BRA) • Wildwater Racing in Columbia (USA) • Marathon Racing in Györ (HUN) • Dragonboat Racing in Gerardmer (FRA) • Freestyle in Ottawa (CAN) Multidiscipline Events ......................................p.66-67 P.68-73 ADVENTURE Keeping the pace in Dubai p.68-69 Steve Fisher p.70-73 P.75-86 PADDLING AND SOCIETY New actions for Paddleability p.76 River cleaning operation in Kenya p.77 World Canoeing Day p.78 ICF Development Programme p.80-85 Canoeing for health p.86 4 CANOEING INTERNATIONAL Edito-Sommaire 26/12/06 19:14 Page 5 P.88-92 FOCUS A new era of canoeing in the world of television p.89-92 P.93-99 PROFILES Katalin Kovacs / Natsa Janics p.94-95 Michala Mruzkova p.96 Meng Guang Liang p.98-99 P.100-102 HISTORY Gert Fredriksson (1919-2006) p.100-102 P.103-111 INTERNATIONAL PADDLING FEDERATIONS Life Saving p.104-105 Waveski p.106-107 Va’a p.108-109 Rafting p.110-111 P.113-122 VENUES Olympic Water Stadiums p.114-117 Beijing 2008 p.119-120 London 2012 p.121-122 5 EBU 22/12/06 10:44 Page 1 Edito-Sommaire 22/12/06 10:34 Page 3 Foreword Dear friends of canoeing, It is a great pleasure to introduce this second edition of the new-look Canoeing International.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashburton/Harakeke River Catchment E.Coli Modelling Project
    Ashburton/Harakeke River Catchment E.Coli Modelling Project Ben Coventry Ashburton Catchment 1) River mouth 2) Urban area 3) Farmland 4) Hills and lakes A good proof- of-concept catchment within Canterbury. Goals and Objectives • Estimate baseline E.Coli loading in the Ashburton River based on measurements taken for swimming advisories. • Model the progression in E.Coli levels down the length of the river. • Determine significant indicators of E.Coli loading based on the model and other data. Current Progress E.Coli Counts on Ashburton River 10000 1 4 1000 2 3 100 5 6 10 7 E.Coli E.Coli Counts (MPN/100mL) 8 1 26/11/16 15/01/17 06/03/17 25/04/17 14/06/17 03/08/17 22/09/17 11/11/17 Date of Sample Collection 1) Heron Rd 5) Digby’s Bridge State Highway 1 Ashburton River Above Mouth 2) Lambie’s Stream 6) Hills Rd SH72 North Branch Heron Rd 3) Quarry Rd 7) State Highway 1 4) SH72 North Bra 8) Ashburton River Above Mouth https://www.lawa.org.nz/explore- data/canterbury-region/river-quality/ashburton- riverhakatere-catchment/ Dairy Farm in the Selwyn-Waihora Catchment by Connor Imeson 250 Hectares 1000 cows 54 bail-rotary shed Supply Fonterra Boundary Map Showing Locations of Wells , Pivots and Waterways Map showing Waterways Path from Farm to Lake Ellesmere The dark blue lines are waterways that flow through the property into Lake Ellesmere To do’s • Work out the travel time of the ground water from farm to lake • Work out travel time of surface water from farm to lake • Look at the Overseer results for farm Spatial Trends in Quality and Quantity Along the Waikato and Waipa Rivers By Shaun Morgan Waikato River Catchment and Waipa River Sub-catchment • Aim: To model downstream changes in river flow and quality indicators in order to examine the effects of the Waipa River on the Waikato River.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato District Council
    WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel REPORT 2 Ohinewai Rezoning 24 May 2021 Commissioners Dr Phil Mitchell (Chair) Mr Paul Cooney (Deputy Chair) Mr Dynes Fulton Mr Weo Maag Page | 1 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel Page | 2 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 The APL submission ...................................................................................................................... 9 3 Statutory and planning framework ............................................................................................ 15 4 Site suitability and physical characteristics ............................................................................... 18 5 Three Waters Infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 20 6 Natural hazards ........................................................................................................................... 24 7 Transport and traffic ................................................................................................................... 26 8 Economic effects .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary
    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by: Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT // 01.07.11 // 30.06.12 Matters Directly Withinterested Parties
    ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT // 01.07.11 // 30.06.12 2 1 This report provides a summary of key environmental outcomes developed through the process to renew resource consents for the ongoing operation of the Tongariro Power Scheme. The process to renew resource consents was lengthy and complicated, with a vast amount of technical information collected. It is not the intention of this report to reproduce or replicate this information in any way, rather it summarises the key outcomes for the operating period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012. The report also provides a summary of key result areas. There are a number of technical reports, research programmes, environmental initiatives and agreements that have fed into this report. As stated above, it is not the intention of this report to reproduce or replicate this information, rather to provide a summary of it. Genesis Energy is happy to provide further details or technical reports or discuss matters directly with interested parties. HIGHLIGHTS 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 02 01 INTRODUCTION 02 1.1 Document Overview Rotoaira Tuna Wananga Genesis Energy was approached by 02 1.2 Resource Consents Process Overview members of Ngati Hikairo ki Tongariro during the reporting period 02 1.3 How to use this document with a proposal to the stranding of tuna (eels) at the Wairehu Drum 02 1.4 Genesis Energy’s Approach Screens at the outlet to Lake Otamangakau. A tuna wananga was to Environmental Management held at Otukou Marae in May 2012 to discuss the wider issues of tuna 02 1.4.1 Genesis Energy’s Values 03 1.4.2 Environmental Management System management and to develop skills in-house to undertake a monitoring 03 1.4.3 Resource Consents Management System and management programme (see Section 6.1.3 for details).
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Food Story the Pukekohe Hub Prepared For
    Paerata Patumahoe Mauku Pukekohe Puni Pokeno Tuakau Aka Aka Te ohanga newhero Pukekawa New Zealand’s Food Story The Pukekohe Hub Prepared for Horticulture New Zealand August 2018 Foreword Horticulture is one of the success stories of New Zealand’s primary industries. In 2017, the industry generated $5.68 billion in value. Export revenue has grown nearly 50% in five years, illustrating the trust the world places in New Zealand-grown food, and the country’s ability to meet that demand. But the industry cannot rest. New Zealand faces opportunities with a growing population and the need to grow fresh produce. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Auckland, and its surrounding rural land. The population is set to rise to 2.3 million by 2043, straining natural resources and infrastructure. And growers are feeling that pressure. The Pukekohe growing hub straddles the Auckland and Waikato District boundaries, and it is key to sustaining the fresh food supply to the country’s largest city. The squeeze on prime growing land in the Pukekohe hub, access to water, and the tensions between the existing industry and new neighbourhoods all mean a more considered and concerted approach to planning is needed. It is the right time to start the conversation about New Zealand’s sustainable food supply with a focus on a growing area experiencing change. Our economic analysis suggests that, over the next 25 years, the Pukekohe hub could face constrained horticulture production. If left unchecked, less production could result in lost economic value, higher prices for customers, and job losses for the industry itself and the sectors it supports.
    [Show full text]
  • Hortnz Submission On
    COMMENTS ON PROPOSED WAIKATO REGIONAL PLAN CHANGE 1 WAIKATO AND WAIPA RIVER CATCHMENTS TO: Waikato Regional Council COMMENTS ON: Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1 Waikato and Waipa River Catchments NAME: Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) ADDRESS: PO Box 10 232 WELLINGTON 1. HortNZ’s submission, and the decisions sought, are detailed in the attached schedules: 1.1. HortNZ wishes to be heard in support of this submission. 1.2. This submission is supported by a technical report that is to be read in support of this submission. The report has been lodged with the Waikato Regional Council via FTP file Transfer and is titled “Values and Current Allocation of Responsibility For Discharges” Jacobs Technical Report in Support of the Horticulture NZ Submission on Healthy River Plan Change”. 1.3. The Plan and this submission cover a wide range of issues and there are potential consequential amendments that will be required to give effect to the relief sought in this submission. Decision sought: 1.4. Other changes or consequential amendments as are necessary to give effect to the matters raised in this submission. 2. Background to HortNZ and its RMA involvement: 2.1. Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) was established on 1 December 2005, combining the New Zealand Vegetable and Potato Growers’ and New Zealand Fruitgrowers’ and New Zealand Berryfruit Growers’ Federations. 2.2. On behalf of its 5,500 active grower members HortNZ takes a detailed involvement in resource management planning processes as part of its National Environmental Policies. HortNZ works to raise growers’ awareness of the RMA to ensure effective grower involvement under the Act, whether in the planning process or through resource consent applications.
    [Show full text]